EGYPTIAN JOURNALISTS CRUCIFIED BY MUESLIS
As secular newspapers were closed (see previous) by Egypt’s ‘Arab Sprung’ new government, drawn from the Muslim Brotherhood, reports emerged in Middle East newspapers of non-Muslim journalists being given agonizing crucifixions by Mueslis – even nailed up on trees outside the presidential palace to general amusement (Sunday Mail, 19 viii).
In Iraq, Mueslis had killed or driven out 75% of that country’s Christians. {No-one could accuse Mueslis – any more than Herr Hitler – of not letting on what their rule would involve! There might of course be a healthy influence of the simplifications of Sharia on banking and the upper reaches of Britain’s public ‘services’ (so incompetent at the Royal Scottish Museum’s Russia-backed sexless exhibition about Catherine the Great [no mention of her countless soldier boyfriends or of the much-loved story that she died in flagrante delicto with a horse] as to provide wall texts so tiny that they could not be read without setting off security alarms).}
BRITISH LIBEL LAWS COULD CHANGE
After Committee consideration (assisted by correspondence from me to my ‘local’ East E’bugger MP [the vagaries of Britain’s parliamentary constituency law including Newington with East Edinburgh despite the intervention of ten square miles of Queen’s Park]), a Bill was tabled for the House of Commons requiring that any successful case for defamation should involve proof of serious harm (Daily Telegraph, 18 vii) – a small but welcome move in the direction of free speech. {If only Race Relations crimes had to involve a similar level of harm!}
FINDING RELIGION
As the British far-right continued to fragment (into some eight feuding mini-groups, of which the BNP, NF and EDL were the best-known three – Guardian, 20 viii), America’s GOP set about solving the right’s problem (of getting back to Reaganism) by adopting presidential and vice-presidential candidates who were, respectively, a committed Mormon and a committed Catholic; and it enjoyed the luck of Obarmy having come out in favour of yag ‘marriage.’
{Good luck to America’s ‘Reds’! – Though one might have thought that agreement about the importance of IQ (as an explanatory variable, as a key guide in selection, and as a main target of eugenic effort) would have provided a more solid basis for the right in its main contest with the left, over ‘equality’.}
In Scotland too, First Minister Alex Salmon brought the head of the Catholic Church (750K members) out against him by backing yag demands: Cardinal O’Brien refused any further personal contact with Fish and his sidekick Ms Sturgeon.
At Westminster, Daft Dave Cameron similarly risked discovering that bumboy rights was the key to unleashing a tidal wave of conservative sentiment against his ‘detoxified’ party – luckily for him, his main rival BoJo agreed, as well a Turkman might.
{Christianity may have managed OK without marriage of any kind for its first 400 years; but by the 20th century it had become identified with ‘normal family life against the increasingly bullying ways of the state. If CO’B could – late in the day – rally his mainly Labour-voting troops, they could strike a decisive blow for the Unionist ooops ‘Better Together’ cause.}
KENYA ‘SHORT OF HUMAN CAPITAL’
As Western firms relocated their HQs to Nairobi (pop. 3M), appalled by the rest of Africa and enthused by the latest buzzy idea of a ‘Silicon Savannah’, Microsoft complained that it could only regard 10% of capital city job applicants as worth training (BBC, 13 viii).
Tribal violence killed 52 in the south-east of the country as the longstanding feud between the Wombles and the Bumbles (which had killed 130 in 2001) re-erupted (probably over cattle and water rights, a matter which even Britain’s hopeless civil service or electricity companies could have sorted out in ten years) (BBC, 22 viii).
LEFTIST SHOCKS FEMINISTS
Top Muesli-backing leftist George Galloway (MP for most years since 1987, lately toppling Labour in Bradford West; on his third marriage to a Muslimme) put the cat among the pigeons at Feminoid House by saying that Wikileaks artist Julian Assange (wanted for ‘rape’ in Sweden and sheltering from trial by holing up in the Ecuador embassy in London) had been guilty at most of “minor” trespasses and “breach of sexual etiquette” (by renewing sex with a bed partner who had dozed off).
The Guardian (which had been little troubled by Assange leaking US military secrets and endangering the lives of US co-operators in Afghastliland) promptly moved into shock-horror mode, even claiming that a woman who so much as touched the penis of her sleeping husband was guilty of “sexual assault” (21 viii, fat Julie Bindel, unlikely to find any male in her bed except a male elephant).
The Sun and its readers and GG’s own party (‘Respect’, led by one Thelma Yaqoob) were also up in arms (22 viii): evidently it was only juries taken carefully through the facts who were prepared to throw out (as they did in nine cases out of ten) the hysterical ‘rape’ charges supported by feminoids and greedy lawyers.
{Perhaps it was time for the realistic, Israelosceptic, anti-abortion, anti-separatist, Trotskyite-condemned GG (awarded Spectator ‘Debater of the Year’ in 2001 and a similar accolade from the US Senate) to find his natural political home – on the right. – His preference for occasional nationalization could surely be accommodated by rightists since two of Britain’s very largest swindles, the ‘Bank of Scotland’ and ‘Royal Bank of Scotland’, had been 80% nationalized since 2008 without a peep from Conservatives.}
BANKSTAS RAPPED
Britain’s grossly greedy taxpayer-bailed-out ‘bankers’ were attacked not just by the left and the Economist but by the Daily Mail (21 viii). Any chance that Daft Dave would legislate retrospectively to tax all earnings and bonuses (including those of civil ‘servants’) beyond those of the UK PM at 95% and thus dispatch his rival Boris and win the next general election (2015) and the anticipated vote against Scottish separatism (2014)? None whatever!
The wankstas had entrenched themselves more deeply into the post-industrial economy of Britain than had the greedy Labour-backed strike-prone miners, steelworkers and carmakers of the 1970s. And DD’s cluelessness about what to do elicited derision as Conservatives defected in droves for UKIP, the Conservatives’ monthly income dropped 10%, and the party had to resort to offering seats at its autumn Birmingham conference at half-price.
Wankstas also found themselves condemned on Russia Today’s ‘Keiser Report,’ in the Spectator, in the Independent and on Sky TV as being quite the major beneficiaries of the West’s latest inflation ruse (called ‘quantitative easing’, giving trillions to fat cats so long as they spent it buying Treasury bonds).
MEN OF VIGOUR
‘Paralympians’ showed their basic mettle (whatever their lack of accoutrements) by getting arrested for child molestation, female molestation and voyeurism (Sun, 22 viii). Three members of the 19-strong Jordanian squad of disabled athletes had been reported to cops by two women as they trained in Ulster to wring the withers of handicap-worshipping Londoners.
Other disablement artistes were exposed as giving themselves electric shocks and breaking their own toes so as to increase their blood pressure and and thus performance.
And it was revealed how the ‘learning disabled’ had been banned from the Paralympic ‘Games’ since 2000. Simply, the entire ‘disabled’ Spanish basketball team had faked low on their IQ tests.
LEBANON ZOOMS TO ETHNIC SCORE
The ‘idealistic’ West’s policy of helping Solunnis topple Syria’s dictator Assad and his Shitite followers clocked up another ‘achievement’ as – with Aleppo half-wrecked – the Solunnis and Shitites of famously multicultural Lebanon killed twelve of each other (and wounded 100) in two days (BBC R4, 23 viii; Haaretz, 23 viii).
American commentator Pat Buchanan agreed with this blog in anticipating a Muslim ethnonationalist Thirty Years War. India, too, was feeling the tremors surfacing after decades of neglect of racial differences and suppression of talk about them.
Ethnic violence in the Assam region killed scores and sent hundreds of thousands fleeing in panic (as Mueslis emigrating from Bangladesh came up against the tribal Bodo). And, as China continued its moves to control the South and East China Seas, huge mobs turned out to scream “Kill all Japanese.”
SINGAPORE SECRET SURPRISES SOCIALISTS
As the BBC and the rest of Britoid MSM devoted hours/pages of coverage to the tiniest decline in 16-yr-olds GCSE pass rate (0.4% -- it should have been 40% after 24 years of dumbing down), educators in Singapore explained the secret of their success: yes, it was streaming (into ‘academic’ and ‘technical’ groups – no need in Singapore for Burt’s ‘secondary modern schools’ for dumbos) which had put Singapore into the world’s top five in educational achievement, whereas Britain had been unable even to stay in the top twenty-five.
Michael Gove (Coalition Education Minister and rival to DD if BoJo fouled up) was said to be ‘very interested’ in the Singapore idea (tried with success in Britain from 1920 to 1965); but whether Govey had read of the similar success of Germany’s streamed educational system (see TgF, Ch.4, 1996/2000) was unknown.
BREIVIK’S REVENGE
As Labour-slayer Anders Behring Breivik heard his Oslo 21-year prison sentence for his 77 murders with gratification and dignity, smirking and with his fist raised in salute, the Oz group (Melbourne Kommunard Activists – MKA; ‘The Economist’) which had portrayed him (he did some high-school business courses) at the Edinburgh Fringe as a frothing neurotic if not psychotic (though his madness was “no worse than that of the Oz PM John Howard” and entirely due to right-wing extremism plus steroids, of course) surely hung their heads in shame.
Breivik was in fact a case of narcissistic and homosexual personality disorder (as explained previously), though his lonely young-adult life with his mama had given him plenty of time to read extensively (which MKA did not admit) and develop a perfectly sane writing style which could easily match that of contributors to the Guardian.
His only mistakes were to have been atrociously cavalier with the lives of Norwegians far too young to have been guilty of the treachery of bringing the Third World to Oslo, and to have left his own open protest against the treacherous socialist-invited Muesli invasion ten years too late.
Having been found legally sane and a genuine terrorist (by five judges, unanimously), Breivik could reckon to avoid for a while the clutches of the ‘expert’ psychiatrists who had declared him mad; but his jail term was capable of extension beyond its 21 years if the Norwegian authorities put their mind to it and deemed him still ‘a danger to society.’
Thus did the ex-Vikings of Norway think to maintain their commitment to modern liberalism: locking up Breivik for less than three months in passable luxury (he had a computer with internet connection) for each of the murders which he had committed.
Despite giving grave offence to many of the victims’ relatives and friends, and risking Breivik becoming ever more of a living legend, Norway’s political class was determined to carry on as if nothing much had happened, and in particular to continue with its policy of inviting mass coloured immigration which (together with subsequent state-aided breeding) would not only supply copious cheap labour but extinguish traditional Norwegian conservatism within a generation.
The incredibly lenient sentence, which could see Breivik freed after just ten years, was an eye-opener about Norway: riddled with guilt about having gone along with Hitler, the country had evidently gone MAD ABOUT PEECEE.
As the trial ended with its ludicrous ‘sentence’, Norwegians were reported to be experience ‘relief’ that the matter was settled – in particular that Breivik’s face would disappear from p.1 of national newspapers (where it had been standard for a year).
What’s this? It’s called hysterical denial! Peecee Norway wanted nothing more than that Breivik would just, somehow, anyhow, GO AWAY and stop disturbing their lib-left prejudice that no-one could object to multiculturalism. Prime Minister Stoltenberger (with fries....) articulated the response of a country that had done nothing since 9/11 to fight Muesli terror: “Our response is more democracy, more openness, and more humanity.”
Was there any cracking in stoic Norway’s peecee liberalism? Yes! The world had been promised a final speech from Breivik. But when he started apologizing in court to fellow nationalists, for not having killed more Muesli-lovers, top judgette Elizabeth Somebody shut him up and had him taken down to the cells. And soc.anth. professor Thomas Eriksson (U.Oslo) admitted there was a “vocal and aggressive” minority in Norway which agreed with Breivik that the country had been taken over by Muslims, with the complicity of the government – and that some sympathized with Breivik’s words, if not his actions.
REALISM WINS THROUGH
After two years of fortnightly wining and dining with EU ‘leaders’ at EU taxpayers’ expense, the unheard-of PM of bankrupt Greece decided to think about thinking about taking the advice (offered here previously, three years ago) that he should sell off some of his corrupt and unproductive (but sun-kissed) country’s 6,000 islands (Sun, 24 viii). This obvious move was greeted with “shock” by pie-eyed natives (gulled by eurodiners ooops euroeconomists into thinking they could live high on the hog for ever at German expense) – even though many of the islands were conveniently uninhabited.
GELS HAVE KNICKERS IN TWIST
As British feminoids urged wymmin to burn all copies of the ‘sensational’ sex&shopping&spanking-of-undergraduette-by-older-man novel Fifty Shades of Grey (which was in truth no more erotic or obscene than Lady Chatterley’s Lover – cleared by a jury for publication in 1959) (D.Telegraph, 24 viii), a lesbian at U.Nebraska admitted she had fabricated a charge of rape – out of idealism, she said, for she had intended to ‘motivate’ other wymmin (who had indeed rallied round to contribute to her ‘fighting fund’) (NBC, 21 viii).
SPLC SPIKED
The multiculti left’s chief pit bull terrier, the mega-rich Southern Poverty Law Centre, at last found itself facing serious opposition as internet evangelist Bill Keller rejected the group’s charge that his ministry was a “hate group”: Keller demanded $100M for this charge, made in response to his saying SPLC had inspired the murderer of a radical homosexualist who had condemned the Biblical view of yaggery (Huffington Post, 17 viii).
EGALITARIAN TWADDLE
The death of astronaut and moonwalker Neil Armstrong was taken by President Barry Obarmy as an opportunity to tell Americans that ‘you can all do it and be famous if you really want’ (BBC World Service News, 26 viii, 02:00BST). Of course this was nonsense. NA’s father, a state auditor, had taken him flying at age two; and by 1950, aged twenty, NA had a science degree from U.Purdue and a gold medal from USAF for his many successful flights over Korea.
Moreover, NA was not keen on fame, preferring to stress his 1969 effort was entirely due to teamwork, declining interviews, and retiring after a year into a quiet life as professor of engineering.
EUGENIC FAXALIFE
After congratulating this blog on its critical coverage of Danny Boyo’s multiculti Olympics, a correspondent from the Continent turned (26 viii) to the remarkably hereditarian and pro-eugenic views of Oxford’s Professor Savulescu.*
Glad to learn that eugenics still has some courageous advocates -- though of course it has been practised in the 'real existing world' even by its most vocal critics whenever their own unborn children are diagnosed with Down's syndrome, etc.
In fact, the only Western country that is still choc-a-bloc full of mentally retarded children is ... Éire. Whenever I visit Galway, I have the feeling that I am everywhere in the close vicinity of a special needs school. But the reason is, of course, that abortion is still very much taboo in the Holy Republic and so mongoloids, spastics etc. are a dime a dozen wherever you go.
* JS had subsequently disappeared from view, perhaps because his Oxford seniors drew his attention to such harsh criticisms as that of Boston bioengineering prof John Sherley who had called JS ‘a fool or an egotist’ (LifeSiteNews, 22 viii).
-----------------------------------
Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.
-----------------------------------