Monday, January 26, 2015


France’s Marine Le Pen was given some media coverage of her views as she prepared to debate (and doubtless get howled down) at the Oxford Union on February 6th (Mail on Sunday, 18 i). Happily, her ideas on the Muesli question were not entirely dissimilar from those advanced in ‘IQ & PC.’

She wanted to abandon the Schengen Agreement, which mandated free movement of self-proclaimed ‘workers’ across Europe’s internal borders – though she seemed to have no proposal for towing ships of A/A would-be migrants back across the Mediterranean.

She wanted mosques constantly supervised – though how this would improve on MI5’s efforts or a policy of closing one mosque per each Muesli murder was unclear. And, most imaginatively of all, imitating Russian policy, she wanted to reintroduce conscription – though how she would get such a policy to bite especially on non-taxpaying Blecks, Peks and Mueslis was not specified.

Still, altogether a not unpromising start, at least as compared with the non-proposals of Europe’s political class.

    Meantime, as Russia had to deal with new ferocious fighting in Solunni Chechnya (killing a score), it reminded the West of another alternative as it razed the homes of some fifteen families believed to have links to the Muesli troublemakers.


 Israeli PM Benjamin Notanyahoo became the first Western leader to admit that Europe was being hit by “a wave of Islamisation.” In response, he said Israel would aim to reduce its dependence on trade with Europe and instead seek to expand contacts with Asia – in token of which he welcomed a 100-strong trade delegation from Japan (D. Telegraph, 18 i).

    In Britain, former Chief Rabbi Lord Sachs was prepared to tell the BBC (R4, 19 i, 08:10) that the mounting anti-Semitism that was putting fear into British Jews was due to “radicalised Islamists” – a rare public admission that Islam had anything to do with anything, though he quickly went on to add the usual piety that such “radicalized Islamists” were only a “tiny minority.”


After thirteen years of the West seeking multiculti harmony in Iraq, and eight recent months of dropping 17K of ordinance to stop Solunnis advancing into Baghdad, Iraq’s vice-president Iyad Allawi (a Shitite who subscribed to Western lunacy) said (Guardian, 19 i) “There is widespread ethnic cleansing there, militias are roaming the areas. Scores and scores of people ... have been expelled from their areas and they can’t go back because of the dominance of the militias.”

A senior Iraqi official, Dr Hisham al-Hashimi, who advised the government on Isis, agreed. “The areas around Baghdad are suffering from a lot of sectarian violence and the tribes there have started to reflect on the idea of joining Isis. The tribes believe that there are moves to deport them from their lands.”

Samarra to the north of the Iraqi capital and Solunni areas just to the south remained tense and dangerous, despite more than seven months of air strikes that had supported the embattled Iraqi military and the large number of Shitite militias that fought alongside it.

A Guardian correspondent added: “In the long term the Sunni areas of Iraq will become independent, alongside Kurdistan and the Shia. Building an artificial nation state made up of these ingredients is a recipe that has failed many times before. Chef Iyad Allawi may cook up a storm in his restaurant with the nation building menu, but he'll end up with egg on his face, unsatisfied customers and a messy clean-up.”


As a thousand mosques and related groups received a completely courteous letter from Westminster’s outsize ‘Community Secretary’ Eric Pickles and a Muesli pal, Lord Ahmad, asking them to help counter radicalization (a plea doubtless made hundreds of times over the previous generation and usually followed swiftly by government handouts), their leadership decided to go into caterwauling mode: ‘Why are we being treated as having some special problem? What comparable requests were being made of churches, temples, synagogues etc?’

Muslim Brotherhood secretaryperson Ibrahim Bogbrush needed only to reply politely assuring HMG of co-operation and asking what precise action was expected to have the gigantic Pickles’ knickers in a twist – for Westminster had no idea what to do about the Muesli problem except to ignore it as much as possible while issuing occasional anodyne reports and letters to provide a semblance of activity to handle the invasion which it had traitorously allowed. Instead, Bogbrush catapulted imams (many of them doddery) into a confrontation which HMG had certainly not sought.


As the mayoress of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, announced she would sue America’s Fox News for saying her city had ‘no-go’ areas dominated by Mueslis (six banlieus were named by Fox), a Guardian correspondent observed (21 i):

"I've heard of 'Gallic hubris' but this woman flies in the face of obvious truth.

Across France large swathes of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered “no-go” zones by French police. In English we refer to these areas simply as “no-go zones” but with more finesse the French refer to them as Zones Urbaines Sensibles. Same thing, two different languages.

At the last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones (Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on French government websites, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control.

I don't see how this woman's exagerated outrage is likely to solve what is fast becoming a religio/cultural civil war in her country."


Legislators in China’s far-western Xinjiang province passed a law to prohibit residents from wearing burqas in public, state media reported, in a continued campaign against what authorities view as religious extremism (CNN, 14 i).The new ban in local capital Urumqi was approved by local legislators in December, and given the green light by the regional legislature at the weekend.

     A spate of recent violent incidents had rocked Xinjiang, a resource-rich region long inhabited by the Turkic-speaking, largely Muslim Uyghurs. The arrival of waves of Han Chinese, the country’s predominant ethnic group, over the past decades had fuelled ethnic tensions. Chinese officials blamed the recent attacks on Uyghur separatists -- whom they also labelled “religious extremists” -- seeking to establish an independent state.


 As Boris Johnson’s paean to ‘the Greatest Briton,’ Sir Winston Churchill, makes clear, WSC was a magnificently rounded and inspiring personality. As The Churchill Factor goes through WSC’s achievements in the military, politics, journalism, world leadership, love and painting, no modern psychometrician would doubt he was intelligent (g+), independent-minded / determined /wilful (w+), lively / good-humoured (e+), conscientious /careful (c+), and affectionate / sympathetic (a+), all topped off by emotionality / neuroticism (n+) (which likely accounted for his jumbo-sized memory and constant drinking) and with the greatest capacity for repartee.

(When one woman tried jesting with him – with regard to his ‘militaristic’ views that, were he her husband, she would put poison in his coffee, WSC promptly replied “Madam, if I were your husband I would drink it.”)

Understandably, BoJo specially emphasizes WSC’s bravery (w+) which was prominent from an early age as WSC – a small, skinny, lisping, ginger-haired boy – laboured to impress schoolmates who dismissed him as feeble (he took up dumb bells and became his primary school’s champion fencer) and to win the slightest approving attention from his disdainful father.

Fortunately, things came together quite quickly for Churchill. Diverted to Sandhurst instead of university (he had probably been somewhat dyslexic), he flourished as a cavalryman and embedded journalist, became famous for his dashing exploits and, when he married Clementine Hozier in 1908, when he was 34, was treated to adoring London crowds usually reserved for royalty. By that time, the a+ side of WSC was also being given a run for its money for WSC (who called himself a Tory Democrat, like his father) had joined the Liberals to fight for free trade, pensions, strikes and tea breaks. An intimate of Liberal grandee Lloyd George, WSC had the world at his feet.

    Churchill’s courage was to be sorely tried. Major military expeditions failed (Dardanelles, 1915; Narvik, 1940; Battle of France, 1940 – from which 600K British troops were only saved by what BoJo agrees with others was Hitler’s “mistake” in thinking his own armies overstretched. By 1942, Britain had plainly failed to rescue Poland (the original point of the UK’s declaration of war), had lost Singapore (and the great ships ‘Prince of Wales’ and ‘Repulse’) and was having a hard time even against Mussolini; Churchill had to endure Stalin waving his pipe and asking when WSC would start fighting.

Even Churchill’s diplomatic initiatives had not paid off: Russia and America had been brought into WWII not due to WSC’s assiduous efforts but thanks to the folly of Hitler and Hirohito in attacking them. And by 1945 Britain was well en route to losing India which Churchill had wanted saved from the detested Gandhi (whom WSC said he wished to see trampled by bull elephants); and had acquired vast debts to America (for what BoJo calls “bathtub” ships) that they were not paid off till the last £50M instalment in 2005.

    It is true that Churchill had a passable line in tough-minded ‘racist’ bluster, being unafraid to call himself a patriotic White and Aryan who stood for “race and nation” and did not want to see “Hottentot” immigration; but his main vision for post-1945 was of an internationalist world – albeit one in which Britain would play a leading role, especially in Europe (which Labour coalminers and steelworkers prevented him joining since they did not want to be run from Brussels); and he gave no thought to how to limit immigration from Pakistani Muslims or Caribbean Blacks (who all had ‘rights’ to come to the motherland) any more than he had to making peace with Hitler (arranging a proper German imperium in eastern Europe in return for British domination of the high seas) after his let-off at Dunkirk and salvation by Polish pilots in the Battle of Britain.

All this was perfectly understandable; but tough-minded realists do not normally expect understanding. Certainly Brits of 1945 gave him little, chiefly because of his mad fantasy of getting US dollars to fund the ex-Wehrmacht in a new attack on Russia (when The Americans were happy enough to get Paris, Rome, Berlin and Tokyo and had no desire to risk the fate of Napoleon and Hitler by quibbling with Uncle Joe): even while cheering for Winnie, they threw him out of office unceremoniously.

    Mercifully, WSC’s legend of defending freedom (that famous V-sign came from the Dutch Vreiheit) was passably intact, not least because it suited the left to applaud the UK co-operating with ‘anti-Nazi’ Communist Russia. But even as he died in January, 1965, with eastern Europe well and truly under the Communist jackboot, the rats were gnawing at the bottom drawer, planning restrictions on free speech which would first be implemented under the Race Relations Act of 1966, a foretaste of the full-blown tyranny of PeeCee which would engulf the West by 2015, making all realistic discussion of differences in IQ, race, sex, sexual orientation and handicap an impossibility.

Churchill would rightly have smiled and rightly had another drink, for he knew he had “achieved so much to achieve so little.” As Enoch Powell – kicked out by the Tories for insufficient multiculturalism – was to put it: “All political careers end in failure.” And this was doubtless specially true when key knowledge sources were avoided (perhaps out of the earliest political correctness, insisted on by Lenin c.1920 to help manage Russia’s sprawling empire): WSC was an enthusiast for science (half-inventing the tank and the seaplane) and Enoch surely knew of Muslim proclivities for cousin marriage, but neither man ever clapped eyes on an IQ test, so their ability to be tough-mindedly realistic about the future was limited.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, January 20, 2015


As Paris paraded the mantras of Western leaders that the killings at Charlie Hebdo ‘had nothing to do with Islam’ and were just the work of ‘isolated terrorists’ for whom the traitorous politicos who had brought millions of Mueslis to the West could hardly be blamed, surveys found 30% of Mueslis to think insults to Islam should be avenged and 65% of Mueslis to want prosecution of anyone who criticized Mahomet; and the televised crowds supporting Charlie did not involve many A/As. A Spectator correspondent observed:

Wasn’t it amazing to see the leaders of Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, Aghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Indonesia, Hamas, Hizbollah, Iran linking hands with Western World leaders saying "Je Suis Charlie!" Oh hang on...

{In fairness, it could have been pointed out that ‘the leader of the West,’ President Obarmy, was also missing – but of course he too was a Muesli, however covertly, elected by multiculticrazed Americans who thought he would solve their country’s grievous race problem.}


A splendidly graphic account of the wretched non-homelives of the Hebdo killers was provided in the Guardian (13 i), which detailed the paternal polygamy, family collapse, children’s homes and near-unemployability from which the Algerians had tried to escape France’s “social dustbin” into a more purposeful life of Mueslidom (which they could barely distinguish from Catholicism). The murderers-to-be, dismissed as petty criminals by police despite several imprisonments and diagnoses of psychopathy, had met in jail:

After his arrest while trying to fly to Damascus in 2005, Kouachi was on remand in the notorious Fleury-Mérogis prison south of Paris, a super-size decaying concrete mega-jail, which is Europe’s largest prison.

The men’s section alone holds 3,800 people – bigger than any jail in Britain. Built in the 1960s, it was supposed to be a model for incarceration but became a byword for tension, inmate violence, drugs, suicide and even the hostage-taking of prison officers.

It is now being refurbished. But at the time Kouachi was placed there pending the legal investigation, it was suffering over 150% over-crowding and Victorian conditions. In 2007, just after Kouachi left and was bailed after 18 months on remand, the International Observatory of Prisons, citing an expert report, complained the conditions were so insalubrious they were dangerous to the health and security of inmates and staff.


 As the West’s peecee politicos and media folk revelled in supporting ‘freedom of speech’ in Paris (where 17 had been murdered by Mueslis), it was little observed that French authorities had several times actually tried to prosecute and close down Charlie Hebdo, that Charlie itself had campaigned to make the Front National illegal, that free speech about Mueslis had long been closed down in Western countries by ‘anti-hate speech’ legislation, and that the topics of race, IQ and biological sex differences had been driven out of public debate as professionals who might talk relevantly about them feared for losing their jobs. {Yes, welcome to the new world of ‘freedom’ – not even critiqued by ‘right wingers’ like Ukip’s Mr Garage, who preferred to mouth anti-racistically that murderous Mueslis (and crackpot socialists) were just a ‘tiny minority’ who just needed a bit more ‘integration’! You couldn’t make it up.}
And the West’s ‘united’ show of pseudo-liberalism did not make much impression in the banlieus of Paris. As memorial services took place for some of those who had died in the terror attacks, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, the Education Minister, held a meeting with teaching officials in response to the many schoolchildren in Muslim areas who had refused to stand to observe a minute’s silence. At a secondary school in Seine-Saint-Denis, more than 80 per cent of the pupils refused to comply, saying the Charlie Hebdo staff had “deserved what they got”. In Lille, a boy threatened to shoot “with a Kalashnikov” a teacher who had asked a class to be quiet during the remembrance of the murdered (Independent, 14 i).
 British Muesli columniste Yasmin Alibhai-Brown also tried to tell it like it was (Daily Mail, 14 i) (she had written a book deploring the rise of veiling):

"Recently, some fourteen Muslim female acquaintances invited me to a small gathering to discuss my book. These were reasonable, educated women, but their reaction to what I had written was staggering.

‘Why did you have to write this, who gave you permission?’ one asked me.

‘Even to think these thoughts is wrong, yet you go and publish them,’ said another. ‘If you were in a Muslim country you would be in jail.’

‘If your mother was alive, she would have slapped you for writing this,’ said a third.

When I replied that my mother, a devout Shia Muslim follower of a liberal sect, refused the veil when she was 22, the woman retorted: ‘Then I feel sorry for you. She was the sinner and she made you one, too.

‘If you are a Muslim, you follow Islamic rules without question. Are you even a Muslim?’"


 Hope for Western respect for love, liberty, loyalty and science got a boost as it turned out that Russia, at least, was making a serious effort to confront the barbaric Muesli ‘state’ of ISIS (aka to Arabic speakers as Daesh – meaning ‘suppression’) and had two of its spies killed (with bullets to the back of the head, apparently fired by child jihadists) – an act which Mr Putin was likely to avenge pretty swiftly (D.Mail, 14 i).


 Superficially, the millions who marched and supported Charlie Hebdo made a gratifying spectacle for the West’s peecee leaders who wanted to make out that everyone was with them in the virtuous defence of free speech. But the leaders had themselves cancelled the most serious forms of free speech (notably about race, IQ and sex differences) over the previous generation, so the support for CH was something of a fantasy. Rather more encouraging was a 50% increase in support for Pegida (‘People of Europe against Islamification’) in Germany, the Front Nationale becoming as front runner in French polld and Ukip’s leader getting air time for the view that it was multiculturalism {with its attendant third-world immigration} that was the biggest threat to liberty.

{Not that Pegida etc had a big chance of success: even as the CH events unfolded, Mueslis of Boko Haram killed thousands and took an area of north-east Nigera the size of Belgium; and a London woman who had been called a hero by PM Cameron for rushing to help a soldier being killed by Mueslis found herself carted off to mental hospital after a verbal altercation with a Black shop assistant in which she suggested he might be happier in Africa.}


 As the BBC’s flagship ‘Question Time’ discussed the spate of Muesli atrocities in France, an overwhelmingy ‘moderate’ audience and panel were provided in Lincoln, with only yag historian David Starkey troubling to defend maximum free speech (for Charlie Hebdo) while assembled worthies wittered on about ‘needing to balance freedom and responsibility.’ Overwhelmed by audience hostility and barely able to be heard, Starkey was unable to mention that, whenever Mueslis had a majority, they didn’t give Christians any freedom and indeed kicked them out, reducing the A/A world’s Christians to 1.5%.

    In fairness to the BBC, the balance of argument was later redressed a little by star broadcaster Andrew Neil who allowed yag politico Michael Portillo and others to get stuck into a French-Egyptian Mueslie who was more interested in her ‘right to be offended’ than in her duty to help punish the CH killers. But ‘QT’ had left the ineradicable impression that British cognoscenti wanted a quiet life of pacificity and politeness and to leave handling mad Mueslis to the French.

This impression was much reinforced by the distinctly thin pro-CH turn-out in Trafalgar Square. (Needless to say, holy peecee Scotland produced no demonstration at all.) It was all rather as when – after a few years of ‘Bloody Mary’ [cf 7/7], the English accepted the relatively peaceful and prosperous life offered under Queen Elizabeth’s Church of England.

Admittedly Elizabeth and advisers had to be personally brave as they faced down European Catholicism – a trait unlikely to be found in Britain’s LibLabCon leaders; but, like her subjects, Elizabeth was far from totally anti-Catholic – actually seeking marriage with a French prince to keep the Spanish at bay – until the Parisians started slaughtering Protestants and the Armada arrived.

So what would be the invasion that would wake up England – the country’s Camp of the Saints moment, as it were? One did not need to look beyond West Africa, where ebola had already killed 8K+ and Nigeria was proving incompetent at dealing with its Muesli invasion. The advance guard of assorted A/As was already at Calais.

    A fine summary of the problems posed for Western leaders by the Mueslis they had treacherously invited was given by the excellent Leo McKinstry (Daily Express, 12 i, ‘Leaders in denial’).


Readers' comments from the Wall Street Journal following the terrorist attacks in France

Just an observation.......
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims'

Think of it:

Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem

Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem

**********SO THIS LED TO *****************

They’re not happy in Gaza
They're not happy in Egypt
They're not happy in Libya
They're not happy in Morocco
They're not happy in Iran
They're not happy in Iraq
They're not happy in Yemen
They're not happy in Afghanistan
They're not happy in Pakistan
They're not happy in Syria
They're not happy in Lebanon
They're not happy in Nigeria
They're not happy in Kenya
They're not happy in Sudan

******** So, where are they happy? **********

They're happy in Australia
They're happy in England
They're happy in Belgium
They're happy in France
They're happy in Italy
They're happy in Germany
They're happy in Sweden
They're happy in the USA & Canada
They're happy in Norway & India
They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!

  And who do they blame....

Not Islam...
Not their leadership...
Not themselves...

And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy!


A fine and full academic summary of Muesli horrors as Christians were expelled from the A/A world (under entirely realistic fears of school closures, rape, pillage, injury, torture, amputations, lashings, stonings, shootings, crucifixions and beheadings) was provided by hardworking American scholar and journalist Raymon Ibrahim [of Egyptian origin] (Crucified Again, Regnery). Ibrahim was not much concerned with the psychology of Islam (with its depriving its adolescent boys of sexual experience except with Christian ‘slags’ or with its deep hatreds coming from polygamy); but he was spot on in pointing to the end of 200 years of Muesli infatuation with West around 1970 as the West turned out to be introducing ‘the permissive society,’ thus losing its good name for family discipline (vital to Mueslis who had no social insurance).

Weirdly enough the Mueslis answer was increasingly to link with the left – but they wanted the money and benefits and they enjoyed the status of being ‘the new underdog’ which the left gladly granted them in return for votes and opposition to ‘imperialist wars.’ Ibrahim was also very good at excoriating Western politicos, media and churches for holding their noses at the fiendish invasion they had unleashed and insisting repeatedly that atrocities like Charlie Hebdo had just “nothing to do with Islam.”
Happily, one ‘mainstream’ newspaper, the Sydney Morning Herald, broke with conventional cowardice and denial for the New Year (12 i, ‘These crimes have everything to do with Islam’):

"When French president Francois Hollande addressed the nation on Friday in the wake of terrorist attacks that left 20 dead, he uttered the predictable mantra: “These fanatics have nothing to do with the Muslim religion”.

His comment is understandable given that France has more than five million Muslims, a stagnant economy, 24 per cent youth unemployment and endemic social alienation among young Muslims.

His comment is also nonsense. A de facto world war is under way and it has everything to do with Islam. It is not thousands of lone wolves. It is not un-Islamic conduct. It involves thousands of Muslims acting on what they believe is their religious duty to subjugate non-believers, as outlined in the Koran.

And the problem is growing, not contracting. There was once a tradition among young Australians to travel overland from Singapore to London. That route has become a hell-hole:

Pakistan is dangerous. Afghanistan is a no-go area. Iran is an oppressive theocracy. Iraq is disintegrating. Syria is a disaster area. Lebanon is dangerous. In Turkey, for the first time, Australians travelling to Gallipoli will be going under a security alert.

All these Muslim countries used to be safe for transit. The intimidation being practised in the name of Islam by a small minority is a by-product of something much larger–the state-mandated conservatism that is systemic in the majority of Muslim societies. Most of them are dictatorships, monarchies, theocracies or failed states.

An investigation by Kings College London and the BBC World Service found that in a single month, November 2014, 5042 people were killed by jihadists in 664 separate attacks across 14 countries. That is one death every eight minutes."

Further mockery of MSM’s mantras that murderers aren’t Muslim, that most Mueslis are moderate and that jihadists can be cured by social workers went on full display among Spectator correspondents (17 i), one of whom actually addressed – unlike all other pundits, talking heads and politicos – the question of what to do about the invaders:

Islam as a brand is dead in the west, and beyond.

Buddhists, Sikhs, Jews, Christians and Hindus, all have a general dislike and mistrust towards Islam, and its' violent psychotic followers.

Our dhimmified politicians and our repugnant media still try to shove it down our throats, but it's done. People do not want it.
Europe's future is bleak: what to do with all these millions and millions of potentially violent and dangerous people? Europeans will revolt I believe. Pegida is only the beginning, yet nobody is listening, not our dear leaders, who filled up our houses with vipers, and not our cowardly media, that had been regurgitating the same exact taqiyya since 9/11.

    The only way I can see SAVING EUROPE is by starting to close down mosques. Only leave liberal mosques open, monitor what's going on inside. This way they will all leave and maybe go back to Cesspitistan.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, January 12, 2015


 With hilarious predictability, it turned out that England’s ‘teachers’ had taken it upon themselves to report to Local Education Authorities thousands of cases annually of ‘bigoted’ children calling others ‘Chinese,’ ‘Jewish,’ ‘Somalian,’ ‘fat,’ ‘beanpole’ or ‘gay’ (Mail on Sunday, 4 i).

The wheeze had been thought up by Labour when it was in power; and, despite the Coalition saying there was no need for it, a Freedom of Information inquiry found that England’s largely leftist schools had continued gung-ho for the project of effectively marking kids’ cards as ‘racist’ when they were as young as five.

{Yes, after twenty years of tyrannizing academics, broadcasters and politicians, PeeCee was perhaps approaching the ridiculous end of its natural life as even children were to be taught not to speak the truth.}


 As lawyers clamped down on all sides in the case of Prince Andrew’s alleged paying paedophilia, there was little for journalists to go on; but at least the father of ‘molested’ Virginia Roberts (pictured below with his daughter in younger days) was prepared to demand the Prince be prosecuted and a nice current photo of late-in-the-day accuser Virginia began to circulate (below, bottom right).

Whether Buckingham Palace, with its fleet of vulpine lawyers, could shake off the ludicrous charges against the Prince – always a ladies’ man – would be crucial: if even Andy (pictured bottom left with persecuted and once-imprisoned ‘prostitution solicitor’ Jeffrey Epstein) could not be vindicated – for sex with a 17-yr-old, for heaven’s sake – most British (indeed, Western) men would have to shiver in their shoes before troublemaker ooops child protector ‘Dame’ Esther Rantzen.


 Desite assurances by Britain’s wretched politicos that they were ‘addressing’ ‘issues’ of immigration, and that fears of continuing influxes were ‘fanciful’ and, of course, ‘racist,’ the number of gypsies rough-sleeping in central London’s lovely Park Lane and Marble Arch tripled to 500 from 2013 to 2014. A visual aid from a Park Lane underpass:

Local residents complained of aggressive begging, noise, fighting, rubbish dumping and public defecation; but none of this troubled Westminster politicos a bit; and the ‘Romanians’ themselves were embarked (doubtless with ‘legal aid’) on claiming council houses because they were EUSSR citizens. {Once, a generous Britain had looked after India, supplying it with its railways, roads and major buildings and in return getting trade and Indian soldiers to dig trenches in WWI. But what did it expect to get from gyps?}


 French intellectuals squared up for peecee battles as top writer-philosopher Michel Houllebecq was found to be publishing a book (titled Submission) that envisioned a Muesli takeover of France by 2022 (Independent, 6 i). MH foresaw a world in which the leader of France’s Muslim party had beaten the far-right ‘Front National’ in the Presidential election, women abandoned Western dress and left work, non-Muslim teachers were forced out of their jobs and polygamy was re-instated. MH (who had long stayed mainly in Ireland) had previously been prosecuted (unsuccessfully) in France for ‘racism’ etc in 2002.

    Another shock for lofty Parisian republicans, who, from their leafy suburbs, liked to assume France was ‘integrating’ Islam, came as 17 people were killed and 11 injured in a grisly shooting by three AK47-wielding masked gunmen at the central-Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, the satirical newspaper [cf Britain’s Private Eye] which was to have featurd MH’s book on its front cover and which had been firebombed in the past after publishing cartoons in 2011 joking about Muslim leaders. Gunmen were heard shouting the traditional triumphalist Muesli salutation ‘Allo Chocbar!’ as they left the scene of their carnage. France’s soppy-socialist President Hollande called for a display of ‘unity’ – though no immediate closure or blowing up of mosques was envisaged.


 After several years of failing to define himself (except as the friend of bankers and vast infrastructure projects), Britain’s star politician, towsel-haired blond London Mayor Boris Johnson, came out {like this blog} saying immigrants should speak English (Guardian, 6 i). The London mayor, who was speaking on his LBC phone-in, expressed sympathy for the announcement by Ukip’s Nigel Farage that staff in public services should show they can speak English. He expressed ‘amazement’ that even staff employed in the public services were functionally illiterate in English. {He must have led a sheltered life.} Johnson said: “We went through a long period in Britain of having kind of multi-culti Balkanisation of our society. We thought it was a very good idea to teach kids in their own language in primary school classes in London. That is a disastrous approach. They should be learning in English.”


 As the Parisian horror unfolded (including some shootings and a few arrests that would give a lifetime of imprisoned luxury to a few Mueslis), politicos claimed to grieve and they arranged vast spectacles of mourning; but there was no hint of action. So what was to be done? The atrocities of New York, Madrid and London had been met by flurries of Western ‘improving’ activity – involving the overthrow of the dictatorships of Iraq, Libya and Egypt, the descent of Syria into chaos, the rise of ultra-fanatical Solunni ‘Isis’ and the generation of millions of homeless pouring into Lebanon, Jordan and the West. In the course of this, nothing had been done about the true heartland of Muesli terror, Saudi Arabia. This was surely enough evidence that the West’s multiculti approach had been an abject failure. It was time to back the whiter, less mad Shitites; and above all to talk to the Russians.

    That the Paris atrocity was traceable to multiculturalism was also clear to Ukip’s Nigel Farage (D.Mail, 8 i):

He told Channel 4 News: 'There is a very strong argument that says that what happened in Paris today is a result - and we've seen it in London too - is a result I'm afraid of now having a fifth column living within these countries.

'We've got people living in these countries, holding our passports, who hate us.

'Luckily their numbers are very, very small but it does make one question the whole really gross attempt at encouraged division within society that we have had in the past few decades in the name of multiculturalism.'

Appearing on LBC radio, he also criticised the 'really rather gross policy of multiculturalism', referring to the cases of gangs in northern towns grooming children for sex.

But even this modest statement of the obvious was instantly denounced by senior representatives of all three of Britain’s main political parties (‘LibLabCon’) as “sickening” etc.


Faced with a couple of Muesli gunmen who had created mayhem at the HQ of Charlie Hebdo, the ‘satirical magazine’ which had poked fun at Islam, Parisian authorities mobilized no fewer than 88,000 armed and armoured cops to deal with the problem – which they failed to do within 48 hours, which saw the Mueslis shooting a policewoman and a roadsweeper and taking hostages in armed stand-offs in a firm near Charles de Gaulle airport and in a Jewish bakery – most hostages eventually died in shoot-outs.

One or two French politicos were prepared to say France was “at war” with its “fifth column” – but even these daring commentators estimated jihadists as enjoying the support of only “1 – 2%” of Mueslis. {At this rate, France could presumably be bankrupted within a month by the modern method of Muesli warfare – France, like the rest of the peecee West, not recognizing that Muesli terror needed to be dealt with by a proportionate [well, preferably grossly disproportionate] response, especially including the blowing up of some of France’s 90 mosques – matching the virtual expulsion of Christianity from Arabia.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, January 05, 2015

GLOSSARY: A/A means Arab/African


 The New Year began with the hilarity of Mediterranean people smugglers sending 970 illegal immigrants (mainly Syrian) in a rust-bucket ship on autopilot for the heel of Italy – the smugglers having abandoned the vessel lest they be arrested (D.Mail, 1 i). ‘Naturally,’ Italian coastguards boarded the unmanned vessel out of humanitaromaniac duty – though having the excuse that there were no instructions from EUSSR Empress Merkel and that Italy would just pass the Syrians on to France, which would try to pass them on to England or other Nordic countries possessed of idealism and requirement of cheap labour (their own White once-working classes having been largely consigned by socialists to enjoying welfare dependency, prostitution, dog breeding and drug-running).

Any idea of towing A/As back to their homelands, let alone of declaring their invasion unacceptable and closing (or blowing up) a mosque in response to each new Muesli outrage was far from the thoughts of Europe’s peecee politicians.

    The success of the smuggling operation was rapidly followed by another unmanned ship bearing another 450 Syrians being headed for the Italian coast  -- where it was rescued by ‘European Border Control Guards’ (including some from Iceland).

At the same time, Germany’s Milkmaid Merkel issued a strong denunciation of ‘racist’crowds (e.g. in Dresden) objecting to A/A immigration; and a former Swedish prime minister said Sweden belonged not to White Swedes but to whoever showed up. A Swedish school banned the displaying of the Swedish flag (Speisa, 24 xii 2014) lest it upset invading Mueslis – and doubtless ‘liberal’-lefties.


 Showing that fantastic wealth-making was still possible in Britain, the Jewish yag ex-Commie crony of Rev Blair’s, ‘Lord’ Mandy Rice-Davies ooops Mandelson, who had twice had to resign from ‘New’ Labour’s government antics over his financial scandals, brought in a cool £1M from the firm he co-owned with his Brazilian boyfriend – adding to the £8M fortune visible in their London home and to the untold assets from his lucrative dealings with Kazakhstan (D.Mail, 1 i).

"Lord Mandelson has amassed almost £1 million in assets held in Willbury Ltd, whose co-director is his boyfriend, Reinaldo."


(News, 31 xii):  No contraception, no dole -- that’s the view of an Australian ex-Labor Minister who believes welfare should be linked to compulsory contraception.

Gary Johns, writing in The Australian, suggests there should be “no taxpayer inducement to have children”.

The former MP who served in the Keating government admits such a measure will “undoubtedly affect strugglers, [and] . . . Aboriginal and Islander people in great proportions”.

“But the idea that someone can have the taxpayer, as of right, fund the choice to have a child is repugnant.”


 As feminists’ cravings for prosecutions of ‘paedophiles’ and ‘rapists’ of the 1970s reached new heights – with even female High Court judges deemed unable to investigate because of their ‘unacceptable’ contacts with the Establishment and its supposed sex maniacs – a Labour MP counselled (D.Mail, 2 i):

John Mann, MP for Bassetlaw, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme:

‘As an example, one of the things that survivors' groups are calling for in the discussions I've had with them is for government to set up a national institute to take forward this work on what you do with all these people coming forward.

‘Probably, it's going to be many tens of thousands of people across the country. The state can't deal with the numbers of people coming forward.

{And why should the feminoids’ programme of taxpayer-funded job creation for lawyers stop at the 1970s? Why not prosecute Shakespeare [Earl of Oxford] or Henry VIII for their naughtinesses?}


 The feminoid and tabloid fashion of criminalizing men for affairs with teenage girls reached a new high point as the UK’s Prince Andrew (pictured with blonde floozy) and Harvard’s Professor Alan Dershowitiz [a top lawyer] were named by an anonymous 30-yr woman in Florida [where the legal ‘age of consent’ was an astonishing 18] as having had sex with her at age 17 – apparently paid by billionaire American investment banker Jeffrey Epstein and ‘madame’ Ghislaine Maxwell [glamorous daughter of suicided tycoon publisher and pension-pincher Robert Maxwell] bottom right), probably as part of a blackmail operation into which Epstein had recruited 40 prostitutes ooops girls to get info on the mighty.

Supposedly some poor girl, who now wanted more money, had been a ‘sex slave’; but no more evidence was produced of this claim than of her name, photo or address. {Secret ‘justice’ had become a habit in the peecee ‘victim’-protecting leftist West. Yes, mediaevalism was well and truly re-installed. The courts of overfed lawyers would decide everything in their own ways, with the public knowing little of what was going on – partly due to British politicos’ censorious restrictions on journalistic ‘phone hacking’ in revenge for the Telegraph’s exposure of their fiddling expenses.}

Buckingham Palace issued strenuous denials that the Prince – apparently the Queen’s favourite son – had ever had sex with an underage girl; but Professor Dershowitz insisted that the case would need to be seriously and evidentially contested.

SPIRIT OF 2015  

Though Britain had wrecked its economy (by overborrowing that its young would take a generation to repay), wrecked its education system (by useless egalitatarianism) and wrecked its relationship with America (by proving an incompetent ally in Basra and Helmand), nothing could dim its spirit as it entered 2015 which would commemorate Magna Carta and Waterloo and see its revered Queen Elizabeth becoming its longest-serving monarch.

In particular, it went ahead with a fine bust of Mrs Thatcher to be erected in the Falkland Islands – thus annoying the h*ll out of the Argies and reminding Brits of their last notable success (1982....) (D.Mail, 28 xii). The bust was to go up at the end of Thatcher Drive, next to the Liberation Monument which honoured 255 UK servicemen and three Falklands civilians who died in the conflict.

{Naturally, questions of race and IQ stayed strictly on hold – with even Ukip vociferously denying ‘racism’.... But Richard Lynn and I stayed unbowed – with the help of pals in Queensland, Tunisia, Zimbabwe, Denmark, Luxembourg, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, London, Saxony and Kansas.}


The London-Edinburgh railway line (once the LNER), at which I had worshipped with scores of other boys in East Barnet of the 1950s, seeing the express trains hurtle from tunnels at 130mph, the height of technology, was brought to a virtual standstill by one of Labour’s vastly overpaid goons, given their ‘jobs’ not with respect for IQ or education but simply as sinecures from which they would pronounce all was jolly-well right with the world thanks to the Gummint.

Here is the overfed goon – though he is only one of many that Labour arranged (and the Coalition continued) to pacify a nation that would actually rather have seen a full House of Commons daily debating (with the PM in attendance, as Sir Winston Churchill usually managed).

Shame of rail chaos fat cat: Signalmen using FLAGS to control 125mph trains, passengers forced, after six-hour delays, to stand from London to Edinburgh, and guess where £675k-a-year boss is... at his holiday cottage in Cornwall

Mark Carne can expect a bonus boost on top of his £675,000 Network Rail salary despite missing a series of performance targets and inflicting misery on thousands of Christmas travellers.


Wise words about ebola from our London correspondent (written as a nurse brought the infection from Sierra Leone to Glasgow, requiring scores of her travelling companions to need to be checked out):

“The whole business of sending NHS staff to West Africa was mistaken because of the danger of the infection being brought back to this country and the removal of NHS staff from the NHS at a time when the service is under great pressure.  Allowing such staff back into the country without having been in quarantine in West Africa or, failing that, undergoing quarantine here before being allowed into the general population is reckless to say the least.

Quarantine is the only effective guard against a disease which is deadly and from which there is no preventive drug treatment.  Consequently, any British national returning from the disease area should also be quarantined.  Foreigners who have recently been in the affected areas should simply be refused entry until the disease is under control.”


 A fine and factual survey of the left’s latest attempts to restrict or even banish thoughts they didn’t like from campuses and the media had been provided in the Speccie by Mark Steyn (19 iv 2014). A sample:

"This is the aging of the dawn of Aquarius: new blasphemy laws for progressive pieties. In the New Statesman, Sarah Ditum seemed befuddled that the ‘No Platform’ movement — a vigorous effort to deny public platforms to the British National party and the English Defence League — has mysteriously advanced from silencing ‘violent fascists’ to silencing all kinds of other people, like a Guardian feminist who ventured some insufficiently ‘affirming’ observations about trans-women and is now unfit for polite society. But, once you get a taste for shutting people up, it’s hard to stop. Why bother winning the debate when it’s easier to close it down?"

{However, MS – though courageously involved in a libel action because he had poked fun at a leading ‘green’ ooops climate scientist -- apparently did not feel brave enough to mention the 20-year ‘liberal’-left suppression of all hereditarian talk about race and IQ....}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, December 28, 2014


As pickpocketing on the London Tube by ‘Romanians’ (i.e. gypsies) reached epidemic proportions, London ‘police’ felt obliged to put up bright-yellow signs in Romanian to warn the gyps that plainclothes police might possibly stop and question them and give them multi-million-taxpayer-funded lawyers to fight their cases (which would happily detain the gyps in the UK for years as the lucrative law merchants pursued their merry ways – doubtless resulting in the gyps having sprogs who would enforce their ‘uman rights for a lifetime) (Sunday Mail, 21 xii).

The bright yellow sign put up by the Metropolitan Police outside Covent Garden Underground station in Central London

{Yes, Paradise was well and truly open for business – like the £10K it must have cost to check translation, produce, distribute and affix advice in Romanian. – What? The cops thought gyps would be able to read it?! They were now as peecee-crazed as the UK’s politicos and pseudo-journalists.}


A record 17,500 people joined the latest in a string of demonstrations against Islam in Dresden, eastern Germany, celebrating the rise of their far-right populist movement by singing Christmas carols (Guardian, 23 xii). The march was organised by Patriotic Europeans Against Islamisation of the West – a group that had grown rapidly since its first protest in October.

    Politicians from all major parties were stunned by the emergence of the right-wing nationalists who vented their anger against what they considered a broken immigration and asylum system. About 4,500 counter-demonstrators marched through the city under the slogan “Dresden Nazi-free”, warning that there was no space for racism and xenophobia in the country that had unsuccessfully tried to spare Europe from communism, killing millions in the process.

    Most Pegida followers insisted they were not Nazis but patriots who worried about the “watering down” of their Christian-rooted culture and traditions. They often accused mainstream political parties of betraying them and the media of lying. Braving cold and wet weather, they gathered outside the historic Semperoper concert hall for their pre-Christmas recital. Police put their numbers at about 17,500, up from the previous high of 15,000 a week earlier.


Though Obarmy’s West had left most of the A/A world in a mess and could not even manage much of a slap for top tyrant, North Korea’s film-censoring Kim Il Pong, there was still some timely British cheer:

Now Mr Robin bob, bob, bobs in for Christmas pudding: Bird who visits grandmother's home up to 15 times a day gets festive treat

A robin who has visited a Gloucestershire grandmother up to 15 times a day has been given a festive treat -- a Christmas pudding tipped with holly (D.Mail, 24 xii).


 As Missouri cops (near combustious Ferguson, St Louis) shot a chap called Antonio dead after he had drawn a gun on them, their peecee rules did not allow them to release information as to his ‘ethnicity’. [He was actually an 18-yr-old Black]. This secrecy did not prevent hundreds of apparently-in-the-know Blecks from protesting vehemently, hurling bricks at cops – the West remaining officially uninformed of the good deeds done in its name (Yahoo News, 24 xii).

St. Louis County police recovered the deceased's man's handgun at the scene. They said they could not ‘confirm’ his ‘identity.’ {Wow! Could these peecee minions ‘confirm’ the Bleck oops person had a penis or his/her own set of teeth? What, actually, were these cops capable of ‘confirming’ to the taxpayers who employed them?}

    Further provoking de Blecks, a grand jury in Houston, after a year of taxpayer-fuelled investigation, decided not to indict a cop who shot dead a Black who (apparently a burglar, and wearing black hoodie) had charged at him as the cop attempted arrest.


 The LUniversity of Oxford, which had long paraded its leftism, anti-racism and anti-Thatcherism found itself targeted by a homeless Black thief who took mobile phones and handbags from St Catherine’s College, St Anthony’s College and what had for years been Oxford’s top academic college, St John’s [pictured], long a home to star Wittgenstininan scholars as well as to once to PM-to-be Tony Blair, saying it was much easier to steal from colleges than from private houses (D.Mail, 26 xii). Finally apprehended, the Black was sentenced to 2½ years in jail.


America – advised by bloggers such as this one – gave a fine black eye to North Korean tinpot tyrant Kim Il Pong who had persecuted Sony over a [third rate] film which had made fun of the crackpot Emmenthal-gorging dictator [an inheriting Commie monarch who had locked up a fifth of his own population] being assassinated: yes, the internet came into its own, giving far more publicity to ‘The Interview’ as the film was released ‘online’ than it would ever have received without Pong’s cack-handed intervention and {let’s be fair} President Obama’s strong objection to interference with basic US freedoms.


A fine compilation of UK peecee lunacy was provided in a Q&A from Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn (27 xii). An example:

39. A witness from Sierra Leone gave evidence for an hour at Inner London Crown Court before it became apparent:

a) She hadn’t taken the oath.

b) She wasn’t telling the truth.

c) She didn’t speak a word of English.

Yes, the Africanne had been allowed to drone on incomprehensibly for an hour in an English court before any of the assembled ‘lawyers’ (doubtless busy counting their £100-per-minute winnings) had felt able to mention they couldn’t understand a word.


 Our times have not always seen the greatest of advances – apart from in female appreciation of the waist-hip ratio (girls got to this a few years before scientists in the 1990s). The A/A world is on fire thanks to Western failure to control the Muslim birthrate; and the West has let itself be invaded by millions of Mueslis who will progress to civil war (hopefully first with their ancient ally Germany....) But there is progress thanks to scientific observation and experiment in medicine (Speccie, 26 xii, Fraser Nelson).

(If only the brain-addled socialist idiots of education could have been diverted from their sinecures long enough to look at a century of psychology and The g Factor (1996/2000) in which their elementary fact-avoidant mistake was exposed!)


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, December 21, 2014

Merry Chrishmush!


‘Outraged’ protesters for depravity, used their freedom (which racists, elitists and sexists did not enjoy) to parade their naughtiness with a few score of (fully clothed) face-sitters strutting, well, sitting, their stuff on the manicured lawn outside the Mother of Parliaments. Telegraph, 12 xii:

"There are more than 200 people discussing female ejaculation and spanking. You can’t take more than a few steps without coming face-to-face with a whip, a mouth gag, or a black leather face mask. Some women are dressed in bikinis, lycra cat suits and fishnets. So are some of the men.

No, this is not a sexual fetish convention. It's the Houses of Parliament, where a porn protest is taking place.

The demonstrators have come together to take a stand against new rules introduced, last week, by the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014. They mean that a number of seemingly arbitrary sexual acts are now banned from paid-for porn watched online in Britain.

So face-sitting, spanking and female ejaculation will no longer be allowed. Neither will urologia (sexual acts involving urine), or penetration with the entire hand, or extremely large dildos.

Ally Jones, 25, a sexual health worker, sums it up: “These laws are rubbish and they’re hypocritical and misogynistic and ridiculous. I hate them so much.”

It’s the sexism – and absurdity – of the legal change that really bothers her:

“[The laws suggest] it’s fine for me to choke on a man’s [penis] but not OK for a man to have a vulva on his face. Natural bodily functions for women are illegal, but male bodily ejaculation seems fine. It doesn’t make sense.”

It is why she has come to protest outside the Old Palace Yard outside Parliament. The original idea was to stage an attempt to break the Guinness World Record for face-sitting, while protesting the porn laws at the same time. More than 1,000 people were promised to attend.

On the day, less than a quarter of that number turn up, and even less engage in the actual face-sitting. But just before 1pm, around 60 brave people do lie down on the cold pavement and let a friend/partner/stranger lower their backside on to their face.

It is a sight that any politician, glancing out of their office window, would probably never have seen before. There are rows of people (mainly men) lying on the ground, while others (mainly women) crouch over their faces. Some of those on the pavement simulate oral sex on the sitters."

Yes: not one of these ‘freedom-lovers’ could be bothered to learn about, read or defend The g Factor...


A titchy step in the direction of eugenics was taken as Britain’s Work’n’Pensions Secretaryperson Ian Dunkin Donut declared he would think about promising to think about promising to limit a little England’s child handouts to families [aka single parent mothers] of three or more babblies. IDS, an RC, was promptly pounced upon by heavyweight ugly fat lefty slag Polly Toynbee (Guardian, 16 xii) who wanted the ‘working class’ [aka drug-taking and -selling unemployables] to be able to breed like rabbits at taxpayers’ expense – though notorious conservatives Heath, Powell, Thatcher, Major, Portillo, Blair and Brown had hardly produced one extant child apiece.


 The Afghaniloon Tallyhoes paraded their insanity for Western delectation by gunning down 141, including 132 children, in a school in benighted Peshawar (Pakiland) (where the ‘authorities’ – of the army – already stretched every fibre to oblige mad Mueslis). The outrage was greeted in the pathetic West not by the razing of 141 mosques but by touching and quite useless sentiments that ‘our hearts go out to the families’ etc etc – not that the West showed the slightest concern for its own families, being more concerned with its own massive ‘welfare’-state artifice of grossly overpaid bankers, BBC bumboys and bureaucrats.


 A Libyan 'arms dealer' carrying order for £18million of ammunition, two British 'jihadis' and 17 illegal migrants... all found in one lorry leaving Dover!

Among those arrested was beardy-weirdie 'British jihadi' Simon Keeler, 43, of East London, who intended to 'flee the country with a fake passport as he planned to travel to Syria to fight {treacherously – but quite without British penalty} for the Islamic State'.

Such was the merry culmination of twenty years of Western ‘policy’ – dedicated to rooting out racists (not to mention sexists, homophobes, eugenicists, elitists and disablists) rather than mad Mueslis. Just which of the UK’s thousands of MPs and overfed officials proposed to resign was quite unclear.... {Of course, the answer from these traitorous vermin, if ever elicited, would be NONE – as they wished to enjoy their pecuniary perks till their final destruction of Britain had them relocate to Zimbabwe or a similar corrupt hellhole which would appreciate them.)


The hilarious state of the Pakistani ‘army’ – officially a big ally of America and China – was cruelly exposed as its ‘soldiers’ took a full eight hours to get control of a military school in which 132 teenagers and 9 staff were being gunned down by crackpot Tallyhoes (whom the ‘army’ had let loose for years – calling them ‘good Taliban’ -- in the hope these madmen would kill Hindus) (Guardian, 17 xii).

{Think of it! Eight hours! In a ‘military school’ where elite parents could have reasonably expected their kids to be safe! (Probably the parents paid plenty to get their kids places in this Peshawar school.) And the eight-hour process was assisted by most of the Tallyhoes wearing suicide vests and blowing themselves up!

Call this an army? And a ‘military school’? The Yanks and Chinks should have dissociated themselves from the cuntry years ago – and certainly when the West began trying to settle Afghoonistan in 2001. – Of course, the Tallyhoes had one big strength: they were happy with poppy growing, which lucrative trade the Western idealists madly opposed – when they could have run the NHS on a share of the profits.

Anyway, whatever the stupidities of Pak’s allies, the corrupt and callous cuntry’s ‘army’ was exposed as a busted flush run by Muesli compromisers who could not even bring themselves to shoot a child-slayer. No wonder Pekiland’s major trade was getting its hundreds of millions of illiterates into Bradford and Birmingham!

What a tragedy for a cuntry that had begun its independence (despite its mass-murderous start) under the passably civilized rule of the London lawyer Muhammed Ali Jinnah! Verily, wherever found, Mueslidom was a disaster (especially to its own aficionados) except in so far as it was fuelled by the West’s discovery and development of oil.


The extent of substitute slave labour for Britain’s once-working class was revealed in NHS figures: in 2013, fully 81% of new nurses for de Nashnul Elf ‘Service’, the UK’s nashnul treashure and replacement for religion, had come from Spain, Portugal and Pakistan  -- nice enough girls, surely, 7K of them, but barely able to speak a word of English, and their new jobs in Paradise involved them having to deal with Britoid dements and pill-rattling victims of socialism-contrived family breakdown who were doubtless not in the finest possession of their one-time faculties (Daily Mail, 17 xii).

Whether these – doubtless very nice – foreign gals would prove superior to the socialism-addled products of Britain’s ‘comprehensive schools’ was not to be put to any kind of experimental test: all that mattered was that the foreign gals would work for lower wages (and at least were perhaps not lesbian or kindred hate-filled feminoids).

Vastly overpaid British ‘ospital chiefs were flying to Spain and Portugal to find recruits because the recession there had led to high unemployment. A loophole in EUSSR legislation prevented the Nursing and Midwifery Council from checking the English of European nurses before they were registered for NHS work.

{Britain’s own nurses were so incompetent – as I can attest from experience – that they did not even know, at 50+, how to cook a Christmas turkey: they complained the bird was ‘too dry’ after they had failed to start the cooking with the bottom upwards. – But remember to have tough oven gloves when you turn the bird over before applying streaky bacon!}


In line with German war guilt and and demand for slave ooops mobile labour, gypsies hastened to infest Britain, especially in the Midlands region between Birmingham and Manchester where the police were so busy at their desks chasing 90-yr-olds for their paedophilic advances of the 1960s that the ‘Roma’ reckoned their own thieving, raping, defecating and littering would pass unnoticed.

Some schools reported thousand-fold surges in gypsy kids in just three years (requiring the taxpayers’ childminding services while their parents went begging) (D.Mail, 17 xii). In some cases, Roma parents were unaware of what they were expected to do for their children and had to be taken food-shopping by teachers to help them fill lunchboxes.

Even England’s useless ‘Ofsted’ bureaucrats warned that school budgets were being put under strain by the cost of extra provision. At one school in Derby, the number of Roma pupils rose from four to 99 – almost a third of its roll – in three years.


 As unprecedented numbers of A/A ‘refugees’ streamed into Euroland (doubtless hoping to beat barriers that would soon be imposed – when Germans got terminally fed up) even hoity-toity ‘liberals’ (usually experiencing A/As only as cheap-labour servants) got a bit worried. For example, the diplomats, lawyers and celebrities living on the priciest street in Germany’s wealthiest city weren’t thrilled about their new neighbours (Bloomberg, 17 xii).

Refugees fleeing war zones were moving into an empty office building around the corner from their lakefront road, Harvestehuder Weg, in Hamburg. The four-storey building being transformed by borough Mayor Torsten Sevecke sat on a leafy plot abutting a luxury development where apartments cost as much as 7 million euros ($9 million). Locals were sueing the city because they were worried their properties would lose value.

    “Where will these people buy their groceries? The cheaper supermarkets are far away,” said Barbara, a 70-year-old pensioner who had property in the area but spent most of the year in Spain. She asked that her last name not be published because it would be “embarrassing.” “I’d prefer if the government invests the money in a new building somewhere else.” Record numbers of refugees were arriving in Europe, roiling regional politics and leaving local officials struggling to provide shelter while managing their constituents’ unhappiness.

    Most ‘displaced people’ headed to Germany and Sweden, where lodgings were being created in any place there was space: in empty schools, campgrounds, a boat on the River Elbe, and even purpose-built aluminum crates that resembled shipping containers. In France and Italy, many ended up on the street. About 345,000 people applied for asylum in European Union nations in the first nine months of 2014, 23 percent more than a year earlier and the most since 2001. Germany, Sweden, France and Italy accounted for almost three-quarters of the total; Germany’s 113,000 exceeded the asylum applications in the U.S.

    On 15 xii, an estimated 15,000 people joined Pegida, or Patriotic Europeans Against Islamisation of the West, in a march through Dresden carrying banners bearing slogans such as “Zero tolerance towards criminal asylum seekers”, “Protect our homeland” and “Stop the Islamization”.


A treacherous moneygrubbing ‘uman rights lawyer who had spent ten years mendaciously accusing British soldiers of naughtiness towards Iraqis (whom the socialist swindler ‘represented’ at a cost to UK taxpayers of £31M)  was given the works in the Daily Mail (19 xii, Richard Littlejohn):

"Last year {the wretch, surnamed Shiner} told the BBC that 85 Afghans were being held unlawfully at a ‘secret’ facility, implying that this was Britain’s Guantanamo Bay.

Shiner knew perfectly well that this wasn’t true, since he had brought a case connected to the camp in open court in 2010.

That didn’t stop him claiming that the facility was ‘completely off the radar’ and unknown to Parliament, while adding sinisterly: ‘People will be wondering if these detainees are being treated humanely and in accordance with international law.’

Shiner now says he was referring to the period of time people had been detained before 2010. But there was no evidence that anyone was being mistreated in secret, so why try to plant the idea in people’s heads?

Needless to say, he found a willing accomplice in the BBC, which also echoed his false allegations about the abuse of Iraqis in a Panorama special.

What’s Shiner’s problem? Was he turned down by the Army Cadets when he was a boy and now feels the need to spend his entire life wreaking revenge?

Most people will find it nothing short of monstrous that our taxes, including those paid by serving military personnel and their families, are being used to pursue vindictive legal actions against blameless British soldiers putting their lives on the line thousands of miles away.

But this is simply part of the much wider human rights racket, a scandalous conspiracy by unscrupulous Left-wing lawyers designed to turn justice upside down.

Most of the actions brought by the human rights parasites are part of a concerted assault on our institutions, aimed at demolishing traditional notions of fair play and common decency.

Smug, self-regarding Shiner describes himself proudly as a socialist. He lists comedy among his interests, but appears to confuse wearing red spectacles with having a sense of humour.

He looks like the legal profession’s answer to Timmy Mallett.

Shiner may fancy himself as a comedian, but he’s having a laugh at our expense. Why should he be allowed to use public money to pursue malicious, mendacious claims made by foreign nationals?

As I’ve argued before, we could end this racket overnight if the law was changed so that the full cost of these unsuccessful cases had to be met by the lawyers who bring them.

Failing that, I’m sure those soldiers falsely accused by Shiner’s clients would be happy to form a firing squad."

g for Chrishmush!

 As a Winston Churchill painting fetched £1.8M, London’s Labour-loving (well, Labour-funded) expert on genetics (or somesuch) was induced out of her hidey-hole to say a word for g:

"What makes a Renaissance man?  A painting by Sir Winston Churchill has sold for £1.8m – so why are some people brilliant at everything?"

"If Churchill hadn’t been prime minister during World War Two, he would still be one of the most accomplished men of the past century. The great wartime leader {who saved Britain’s honour even if losing its Empire} won the Nobel Prize for Literature {with his history books} in 1953 and one of his paintings recently sold for £1.8m.

Polymaths – those who have expertise in many different areas – are known as Renaissance men, because so many all-round geniuses emerged in the period. The painter/ scientist/ philosopher/ engineer Leonardo da Vinci is the archetypal example – but what leads some people to be brilliant at everything? {Churchill was also an expert husband, father, builder, trainer of budgerigars and, of course, wine-taster.}

Geniuses are incredibly rare (some argue there are no more than one genius per million people), and it seems inconceivable that a brilliant physicist could also be a first-rate musician.

But Robert Plomin, professor of behavioural genetics at King’s College London, argues that those with exceptional intelligence tend to be brilliant in many areas, not just one. “If you’re smarter then you think more strategically, regardless of the role,” he says. “The idea is, if you're very smart then you play your cards better.”

Somebody who excels – whether in sports, music or the arts – tends to have above average IQ. And those who insist that they’re brilliant in just one subject aren’t simply being modest – they consider their other talents to be poor compared to their greatest achievement.

 “People will often say, ‘I’m good at this but no good at that’, but really what they mean is that they’re less relatively good at the other thing. Compared to everybody, they’re actually good in both,” said Labour-funded Plomin.

The stereotype of a scientist with no social skills or appreciation for the arts is nothing more than a myth. “A lot of people think that boffins are only good at one thing. I think that’s a bit of envy,” says Plomin. “People say, ‘They’re good at that but horrible human beings’, and that's generally not true.”

But although geniuses may have the potential to be brilliant in many ways, we can only measure performance, not abstract ability. The contemporary focus on specialisation means that modern geniuses aren’t encouraged to expand their knowledge in the same way as Renaissance men.

An Aesop’s fable tells the tale of a hedgehog who knows a lot about one little subject, and a fox who knows a little about a lot of subjects – academia today seems more receptive to hedgehogs than foxes, says Plomin.

“Nowadays the training is so specialised, they wouldn’t let you develop talent in other areas. But the big advances come from the foxes who know a little bit about a lot of things and can put two and two together, rather than the hedgehogs in the trenches who are burrowing away and trying to find out more and more about less,” he says.

Of course, most of us would love the chance to be a hedgehog and be considered a genius in our field. But if you’re already a hedgehog then it’s difficult not to wonder: how does the world look from the perspective of a fox?"

Santa as a welfare dependant

1. He has a serial record for breaking and entering

2. He uses various animals to pull his sleigh

3. He only works once a year

4. He's never actually been seen doing any work in his whole life

5. He drinks alcohol during working hours

6. He barely leaves his home for fear of being recognized

7. He wears the same, out-of-fashion clothes every day and never washes them

8. He uses loads of different names and aliases purely for his own gain!

9. He gets letters from a lot of people, all demanding that he owes them things!

10. He can get hold of all the latest designer gear but never pays a penny for it!

But now for something more patriotic

(D.Mail, 8 xii):  Our very own Eiffel Tower: 150 years young, the Clifton Suspension Bridge is an awesome tribute to British genius - and bloody-minded determination

"On Monday afternoon, 8 xii, thousands will turn out for a procession and a party, just as they did on this day 150 years ago, to salute what is not only one of Britain's most remarkable engineering triumphs of modern times. It is also a tribute to surely our greatest engineer, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, who designed it. Throughout its existence, the Clifton Suspension Bridge, 245 feet above the Avon Gorge linking Bristol with Somerset, has been wowing passers-by. Tonight, celebrations kicked off with a spectacular fireworks display above the 1,350ft bridge"

Yes, dear readers, I bin dere – stopping my motorbike (c. 1966) in the middle of the bridge and looking with some horror at the distance down (a distance through which a depressed mother and her newborn baby would plunge to their deaths in 2014). Never fear: even the worst Christmas presents have never tempted me to suicide, to which Old Pulteney scotch has always seemed pre-eminently preferable. Bottoms up!)

Even more patriotically, the young Prince:

17-month-old George shows off his guardsman jumper. Photograph: Ed Lane Fox/Getty Images


 Christmas brought the happy news that Britain’s ‘faith schools’ (mainly CofE) were twice as successful as the godless primary institutions set up by sixty-five years of socialist atheism (D.Mail, 12 xii). Sure, this might have been because brighter parents took the trouble to get their children into schools which valued knowledge, had discipline, and enjoyed the great rituals of Christianity [though the Whitsuntide arrival of the Holy Spirit had got played down in recent years].

But so what? The model of acknowledging the mystery of the origin of the universe and life, mind and soul and of acknowledging the importance of hope in love and marriage [for which Christians had struggled for 2K years against the strictures of their greedy churches – which wanted cash passed to themselves] was valued by high-g people and probably did their kids good.

Although the spineless ‘bishops,’ ‘ministers’ and politicos of the West had proved content to see the third world breed like rabbits and to see Christians ejected from Arabia and east Africa and imprisoned (fully a quarter of them) in North Korea (and probably China), ordinary people continued to acknowledge -- beyond the merry fripperies of Santa, the angel atop the tree, messageless Christmas cards, mince pies [not the Scots variety!] and Vladivar 100% -- that historically worked-out Christianity spoke for them in recognizing a woman’s devotion to her male baby [providing her a penis for multiple breeding, a solution to her ‘penis envy’ problem, as Freud explained] and her seeking out some generous sucker [Joseph] to protect and provide; and in recognizing a man’s wish to solve problems [Joseph wisely whisked Jesus away from Herod’s Israel to Egypt] but also to believe his own sufferings in life as he took on sclerotic authority were akin to those of Jesus himself [‘I did it my way’ was always the most popular karaoke song of Western imbibers].

Yes, though enfeebled by the bloody French and Russian revolutions and by the endless official French wish for revenge on the Germans [though most Frogs had actually happily collaborated with the Nazis], Christianity had just about survived as a kindly, psychologically realistic alternative to Jewish legalism, Hindu superstition, Buddhist nihilism, East Asian conformism and the grisly Mahometan death wish [deriving from loveless polygamy]; and indeed still provided – despite its ‘liberal’ idiocies – the only place in the world to which the wretched of the earth risked their lives and spent their families’ fortunes trying to immigrate.

Small wonder, then, that higher-g British parents sought access to faith schools! LONG LIVE REALISM – even if somewhat dimly perceived through bread-sauced turkey, brandy-buttered Xmas pud and renderings of ‘On the first day of Christmas’ and ‘Good King Wenceslas’ [as we’ll try to remember to contrive at South Clerk Street Mansions – visual aid follows]!

And, reminding us that China will soon become the world’s most Christian country, this nativity scene (just inside our front door) was contrived by delightful Chinese gals – one from Guangzhou [an art-loving venue, just north of Honkers, which hosted Shiou in 2014] and one from Taipei [mercifully separated by 200 miles of waterway and America’s Seventh Fleet from Chinkish communism and derivatives].


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, December 15, 2014


Faced with thousands of A/As in Calais, waiting to hide in lorries bound for paradise Britain, France ‘demanded’ the EUSSR (extensively funded by UK taxpayers) pay £3M to convert a kiddies’ playground next to the port into a resource that would serve 700 meals daily, facetube connections and soft-loo-papered toilet facilities to help A/As as they waited for their chances to reach the land of hope and welfare which other EU countries provided only for subjects who had already made some contribution to their systems (Mail on Sunday, 7 xii, ‘Holiday camp for migrants’).

{As I recently explained to Mrs Margaret Gilmore, our ‘local’ East Edinburgh Labour MP – no-one in south Edinburgh (home to ex-Sir Fred the Shred) thinks they live in grotty east Edinburgh – ‘the Churchill/Beveridge/Attlee welfare state has reached the end of its natural life.’}

{I am known personally to three members of the House of Lords, and currently to four MPs (though anti-euro Labour deviant Austin Mitchell and ex-PM ‘saviour of the world’ Gordon Brown are about to retire) and constitutionalist guru Vernon Bogdanor (Oxford tutor of PM DD). – A fat lot of good it has done me!... Welfarism in Britain long ago replaced the Church of England and the male-headed family which the pathetic cheap-labour-seeking lesbianizing Church had failed to back.}


 After Claridge’s Hotel, in Mayfair, politely suggested a breastfeeding mudder should be discreet, and supplied a large napkin to that end, forty ugly fat-slag lesbos turned up (surely without husbandly advice) to parade their engorged mammaries, useless hairdos, pudgy fingers, splayed legs [contrary to Doctor Johnson’s advice] and greedy welfare-dependent sprogs (Mail on Sunday, 7 xii).

Yes, Britoid wymmin, having quite failed to resist the oppression – and, indeed, stoning – of their sisters under Islam were happy enough to make a nuisance of themselves to the kindly money-spinners of the West. (Claridge’s advised them they could always go to the Ritz.) A 2010 ‘Equality Act’ had made it unlawful for a business to discriminate against a breastfeeding woman. {So a man could half-undress and point to his own genitalia with similar impunity?...}

    The Speccie’s Melissa Kite put it well (6 xii):

"David Cameron and Justine Roberts of Mumsnet chorused tritely that Mr Farage was wrong to say anything at all about breastfeeding ever, because it was all perfectly ‘natural’. And so it is. But a whole range of bodily functions are natural. It doesn’t mean we should get to do them in the middle of Claridges.

The mother in question was ‘completely shocked and appalled.’ She knew the terms of the Equality Act. Oh yes. She said she didn’t understand why as a society we were offended by breastfeeding. Here’s the thing. We are not offended. What is being questioned, I think, is the putting on display of an act of intimacy."


A ‘humanitarian’ ‘photojournalist’ of British origin, but who had sacrificed his nationality to get an American passport, was beheaded – along with a similarly daft White South African – as he set about his self-chosen mission of detailing the poverty and squalour resulting for Arabs from fifty years of internecine Muesli fighting in Yemen – hardship already well known to any newspaper reader in the West, though not apparently to the yag-looking said photojournalist.


That Europe’s ancient left-right division – under which all parties became leftist and Mueslimified for lack of support from the lesbianized church and peecee-undermined cops – was being superseded by the division between tough-minded realists and tender-minded idealists was indicated as Europe’s ‘far right’ parties began to link up with Vladimir Putin’s effort to defend the White race.

In Paris, the Front Nationale confirmed that it had taken a whopping €9.4m (£7.4m) loan from the First Czech Russian bank in Moscow (Guardian, 9 xii). This loan was logical enough. The FN’s leader, Marine Le Pen, made no secret of her admiration for Putin; her party had links to senior Kremlin figures including Dmitry Rogozin, now Russia’s deputy prime minister, who in 2005 ran an anti-immigrant campaign under the slogan “Clean Up Moscow’s Trash”.

Le Pen defended her decision to take the Kremlin money, complaining that she had been refused access to capital in France: “What is scandalous here is that the French banks are not lending.” She also denied reports by the news website Mediapart, which broke the story, that the €9.4m was merely the first instalment of a bigger €40m loan.

The Russian money would fuel Marine Le Pen’s run for the French presidency in two years’ time. Nobody expected her to win, but the FN topped the polls in May’s European elections, winning an unprecedented 25% of the vote; Le Pen’s 25 new MEPs already formed a pro-Russian bloc inside the European parliament.


The moronic dream of Britain’s LibLabCons that every child could become, well, a sociologist, met its come-uppance as Britain had to hire bricklayers from Spain and Portugal and sandwichmakers from Hungary, on ten times the wages they could get in their homelands, to make up for Britain’s idealistic failure to train its schoolkids in skills which they could master (D.Mail, 9 xii).

An agency based in Warsaw claimed one of its firms, run by Conservative peer Lord Wolfson, had already taken on 7,000 Poles. UK Work and Pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith (who had an incomprehensible scheme for solving the problem) said the UK benefits system encouraged skills shortages by allowing British people to live comfortably without work.


 The peecee West, which had ostracized star geneticist James Watson for ‘racism’, received a resounding kick in the teeth as Watson’s despairing sale of his Nobel medal to fund more research was met by Russia’s richest man, mining tycoon and Apple investor Alisher Usmanov (also owner of London’s top football team, Arsenal), forking out $4M to Watson and then promptly giving him his medal back (Washington Post, 10 xii).

Russian businessman Alisher Usmanov says he was "distressed" that U.S. scientist James Watson had felt forced to sell his Nobel Prize gold medal

 "In my opinion, a situation in which an outstanding scientist has to sell a medal recognizing his achievements is unacceptable,” Usmanov said in a statement. “James Watson is one of the greatest biologists in the history of mankind and his award for the discovery of DNA structure must belong to him."

Mr Usmanov was worth $16B and believed that treatment of his father’s cancer had been assisted by Watson & Crick’s DNA discovery.

The Russian billionaire was well-known as a patron of the arts. One of his recent purchases at Sotheby’s was an art collection of the renowned Russian musicians Mstislav Rostropovich and Galina Vishnevskaya. In 2007, he bought it for $112M and gratuitously passed it to the Russian government. The unique collection is currently exhibited in the Konstantinov Palace in Saint Petersburg (Tass, 9 xii).

James Watson, 86, had previously endorsed the abortion of homosexual foetuses and concurred with conventional wisdom that darker-skinned people tended to have stronger sex drive; he also said he would have aborted his own son if he had been able to foretell the boy’s becoming – as he did -- schizophrenic.

In 2014 he {like this blog, q.v.} spoke favourably of Nicholas Wade’s A Troublesome Inheritance which frankly and engagingly acknowledged quite a number of evolutionarily based race differences.

    The left’s main line remained to denigrate Watson for his views on topics on which he was not ‘expert.’ But one Guardian correspondent pointed out (10 xii):

"Incidentally, is it morally flawed if an expert in the field of intelligence holds "racist" views on intelligence's distribution? I'm thinking particularly of Arthur Jensen, see some of his research here


 Inspired by the outdated welfarist and Nobel-pacifist mulatto Obarmy, America – helped by its politicos taking a prolonged Halloween-Thanksgiving-Christmas-Hogmanay break – embarked on a fulsome denigration of its own intelligence operatives who had tried – using non-scarring quasi-torture – to solve the riddles of 9/11.

Sparing no expense, a 500-page gummint-funded document from Senatorial busybodies provided lurid detail of CIA waterboarding, rectal feeding, prolonged nudity, shackling and sleep deprivation (which sadly got little nearer solving such questions as why three unannounced planes could fly undetected and unhindered to New York and Washington).  MSM agreed with Obarmy to denounce the country’s servants for a modest suspension of Muesli ‘uman rights.

Just why Mueslis were entitled to any rights at all when they were invaders whose shock troops – seldom criticized and never ostracized by imams -- granted no rights to Westerners (apart from mercifully quick beheadings) as a mystery (except for White politicos having got stuck with the peecee gimmicks on which they had relied for Muesli votes).

The Mail responded to America’s self-torture with photos of a yag being thrown off a building by Isis in northern Iraq – if not killed thereby, he would have been stoned to death in accordance with Koranic injunctions.}


 That the pimping of girls was no unique speciality of capitalist Whites was revealed by Africanseer’s late-arriving 5 vi 2012 report that scores of passably nubile Chinese girls had been imported to Nigeria for the delectation (costing $2.5K per night) of Black bigwigs.

Girls were bribed in the usual way with promises of jobs as secretaries etc. They were specially popular with Black males because of their tight vaginas – those of Black women having been unduly expanded and left unable to grip despite the use of alum stones to dry them out.


Having failed to persuade people that there were no race or sex differences, PeeCee turned its tyranny to new targets, condemning a Lady Jenkin, a health expert famed for her liberalism and moderation, who had dared to suggest that Britain’s ‘poor’ (well known for their addiction to 40p ciggies, stinky popcorn and Sky Sports licenses for their widescreen TVs) sadly lacked cooking skills and could do well to make porridge (normally costed at 4p per bowl) rather than tire themselves out visiting ‘food banks’ for past-sell-by-date tins of asparagus (D.Mail, 10 xii).

Detected in her ‘error’, Lady J dutifully grovelled to the loony tyrants who sought new worlds to conquer – thus having her cowardice hand Ukip another few hundred thousand votes. {The inability of what was left of Britain’s elite to speak freely – or even to speak the truth – would surely prove the end of these gutless peecee-indoctrinated swine who were almost as comical as PeeCee itself.}

    The Mail’s Quentin Letts, after reviewing some of the most egregious cases of PeeCee’s recent bullying, concluded:

"I could mention others: Tory MP Patrick Mercer for daring to say he had known some soldiers from ethnic minorities who were thick; Lord Young for saying we were comparatively well-off, despite austerity cuts; Andy Street, head of the department store John Lewis, for some jovial remarks about France being ‘sclerotic, hopeless and downbeat’, and many more. All were making perfectly justifiable remarks. Yet all swung on the gallows of the rolling-news cycle.

    The story by Hans Christian Andersen of the little boy who said the king was starkers is, at its root, a story about power and self-blinding loyalty. No ruler and no ruling caste is served well by people who chillingly try to suppress the truth. It is a fable that the false-moralising, shroud-waving, intolerant elite of modern Britain -- so quick to take politically-motivated offence on behalf of an entirely unfazed and unimpressed populus -- would do well to heed."


In an astonishing exercise of his smooth Etonian and Oxford gifts, PM DD popped down to Turkey to ask Dictator Doggin to prevent ‘British’ Mueslis (who should never have been hosted, let alone let loose by Britain) returning from their treacherous service to ‘Isis’ to kill as many British cops and off-duty soldiers as they could.

In exchange, DD would back Turkey for membership of the EUSSR, making it the biggest EU country and allowing it to export its millions of Mueslis, making a final mockery of DD’s stated objective of controlling third-world immigration to the UK. Was DD certifiable – as suggested by some Speccie correspondents (10 xii)?


 As Germany pursued its long-held ambition of consolidating its ‘zone of influence’ to its east, having the people of south-east Ukraine shivering in their cellars as they were bombarded at once by Berlin-backed and Moscow-backed forces, the Mail’s Peter Hitchens, a reluctant but realistic Germanophile, explained (10 xii) that the Ukraine was a corrupt, lawless and bankrupt – as well as vast – pseudo-state and thus ripe for the embrace of the EUSSR.

{Sadly, even the ‘right-wing’ PH could not appreciate that considerations of language and nationality were bound to tear the Ukraine apart in response to the EUSSR’s wanting to resume the Cold War with Russia – and indeed turn it hot.}


Britain’s time-wasting educational inspectors (of ‘Ofsted’ – short for ‘Office armchair instead of Education’....) admitted that two thirds of “bright” kids did not fulfil their potential because of boring lessons for dumbos and bad behaviour at Britain’s hopeless ‘comprehensive schools’ (D.Mail, 11 xii). Just how ‘brightness’ was measured could not be mentioned by Ofsted....


 An attempt to blast a top Ukip official as a ‘sex pest’ backfired as the accuser, a Mrs Bolter (a scarcely inexperienced mother of five, once Natasha Ahmed, currently divorced), turned out to have lied about her age (she was 39, not 35), her ‘top Oxford degree in PPE’ (she had never attended OU, said the university), her Oxford college (which she called Wadam instead of the more usual Sodom ooops Wadham), her ‘teacher training,’ her being thrown out of Labour for not paying her subs, and her flirtation with Mr Bird (which continued for months after the date which she later chose as revealing he was a political rapist – for Ukip certainly wanted a few good-looking female candidates who were the children of immigrants) (D.Mail, 11 xii).


 British politics (in which the elected parliamentarians had been sent on prolonged holiday as their hand-to-mouth leaders prepared themselves for re-election – which they would not get, following their years of multiculti madness and failure to impose English, debating, financial probity and voting on ‘Europe’) were briefly enlivened as the country’s officially top weekly telly discussion programme, ‘Question Time,’ chairpersoned by the ever-more-useless and peecee David Dimblebore, 94, managed to stage – in the safety of civilized grammar-schooled Canterbury -- something of a confrontation between the equally ignorant ‘right-wing’ ‘Poundshop Powell,’* beer-swilling Ukip leader Nigel Garage and the ‘left-wing’ multi-millionaire druggie, sex maniac and ‘comedian,’ ‘Chest-haired No-brain,’ Russell Brand [no relation] (Guardian, 13 xii).

These equally ‘anti-racist’ pop-populist performers managed to get members of the audience screaming at each other, thus disguising the fact that neither ‘politician’ could either see or seize the reasonable common ground of recruiting unemployed Blecks and Peks into a passably-funded Humanitarian Task Force for the A/A World that would do tremendous good and have fun suicide-bombing AlQueerdo, Eyesore and Yoko Haram before dying off.


 Britain’s passably popular ‘racist’ party had itself a Merry Little Christmas celebrating the decision by ‘Dirty’ Richard Desmond to give it £300K and to bring out his newspapers (Daily Express, Daily Porn, Weekly Porn etc) in favour of the OAP ooops Senior Citizen Party at the UK’s imminent 2015 (chaotic) General Election.

Further adding to Ukip’s credibility, the Daily Telegraph ‘revealed’ that cheery-chappy Ukip leader Nige Garage had twice corresponded with the only near-realist of British politics, the scholarly Enoch Powell – though Enoch had disdained the advance as he had by the 1980s committed himself to the Ulster Unonists, not realizing that they too (like the ‘Tories’) would betray him in return for dosh and gummint jobs from Revs Clinton and Blair.

* For genius (if IQ-ignorant) Enoch, see


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.