Monday, September 15, 2014


Not content with sabotaging Britain with comprehensive schools, third-world immigration, PeeCee, EUSSR, ECHR, unexplainable neo-bankruptcy (in fact due to ‘subprime lending’ and government-backed casino banking), non-policing, telephone abuse (unwanted calls, non-answering numbers), yag marriage, hour-long airport strip searches of pregnant women and children, and useless wars in which few Mueslis got killed by what was left of the country’s soldiery, Britain’s holidaying politicos proposed to bring the lethal Ebola virus in from Africa as soon as possible to finish the job.

A leading academic warned that university students could be at risk from the deadly Ebola virus – because 21,000 students from countries in the affected jungloid region from Sierra Leone to Nigeria were about to arrive in the UK (Sunday Mail, 7 ix).

Anthony Glees, the Professor of Politics at Buckingham University, called for West African students to be held in their home countries until they had been declared clear of Ebola and the 21-day incubation period had passed; but Westminster was pre-occupied with following the break-up of the UK which it had encouraged, and university VCs and their bloated management staff were determined to secure their obscenely fat salaries which depended on a steady supply of (over-optimistically) ‘aspirational’ low-IQ ‘students.’

A Mail correspondent wrote: “Con/Lab/Lib will let them in -- must keep the universities in clover. Fees will be paid by us in the form of a loan which will never be re-imbursed. Now they bring the threat of Ebola -- only a small risk, say the Unis; and our 3 Stooges [Lib, Lab, Con] do nowt as usual, words fail me!”


 Scots awoke shocked to find that their new poll support for separatism had knocked only 1% off London markets and the pound sterling. England was evidently quite resigned to, and even cheerful about its internationalist slave labour policy which recruited from Pakistan to Poland and did not require the socialism-addled products of Clotland’s non-grammar skules.

Yes, the 50-year-fashioned peecee-globalizing money-making Anglo-Saxon religion carried the serious risk that England would find itself in a state of permanent civil war between its Jews, Muslims, Hindoos etc, and without a friend around the Atlantic.

But demakrazy – having wiped out the powers of the monarch and replaced the lords with party hacks -- required only brief thinking ahead till the next election. Scotland could go its own welfarish way even if it did without PeeCee – at least as far as the English were concerned.

    Anyhow, whether bonnie Scotland would long preserve much unity beyond separation was doubtful. A Marxite Guardian columnist summed up the enthusiasm of the present: “On the ballot paper on 18 September, YES seems to read ‘Never live under a Tory government ever again!’” But an ‘independent’ Scotland – hypothetically retaining the Queen, the pound, Nato membership and EU membership – would still find itself divided along west-east (Catholic-Protestant, Glasgow-Edinburgh) and north-central-south (Gaelic-urban-charmingly rural) not to mention its own sponger vs elitist and flat-dwelling vs landowning lines that would prove quite as hard to master as the ethnic divides of England.


Fat bearded Muslim ‘British’ hate cleric Anjem Choudary, drawing benefit for his four children and an unknown number of wives, described the Islamic State as the sort of society he would 'love to live in' with his family, while insisting that he did not himself know the terrorist beheader of White American journalists, 'Jihadi John'. The murderous ‘radical activist’ said he admired the genocidsal makeshift ‘IS’ state set up by militants in Syria and Iraq, believed to be dragooning several million people.

However, the 47-year-old said that, while he viewed his British passport as nothing more than a travel pass, he would not move to Syria as he was born in Britain, and that if he were to try he would be arrested by British police. {For what? 100% of White taxpayers would be delighted to be shot of the traitor – if he could not be hung, drawn and agonisingly quartered.} 'From what I understand from people living there, they have security, schools are now being set up where their children are taught about Islam, and they have the basic needs of food, clothing and shelter,' ChowFarty told the multicult-loving Observer newspaper.


 Faced with noisy Irish-Glaswegian enthusiasm for ‘Scottish independence’ (i.e. for giving Etonian Tories and Jewish-led Labourites a good kicking) and with having to explain to themselves and the Queen how they had been unable to preserve the UK – even when Labour got 40 Westminster seats from it – Britain’s politicos came up with their daftest-ever plan: to give the Scottish ‘parliament’ (of fat lesbian frumps – these kind of wymmin having time for politics) full tax-raising powers to fleece its fellow Jocks and thus provide all the socialism/compassion that Glaswegians could want.

Hang about! Scotland to pay for Scottish welfare? That was England’s job! London’s all-party-backed wheeze of buying off ‘independence’ sentiment by issuing the Scots with self-taxing responsibilities would prove an entirely damp squib – except in so far as Scotland would know it was kicking at an open door, an exercise at which First Minister Fish had already proved himself adept, having for seven years declined to use Scotland’s already-existent income-tax-raising powers and instead taken the money (for free university places, subsidized old folks, prescription charge exemptions, useless Edinburgh trams etc) directly from London.

{The failure of the multicult-addled English to tell Glaswegians where to get off was, of course, par for the course: England had spent the previous century losing India, Africa, Ireland, its church, its law-making, its grammar schools, its counties and its high streets. Now, to save face, its hopeless parties -- which no-one any longer joined (unless bullied by trade unions) -- thought they could bribe Scots with their own money.

The Scots were unlikely to be impressed. As HM Queen sent her dreary peecee Westminster party leaders [Daft Dave, Milliletre and Cleggover] up to Edinburgh to make propaganda, the SNP’s Mr Fish quipped that he would gladly pay their bus fare.}


 The complete inability of Black Africans to run a modern country was exposed as the Ebola virus tore through Liberia – a state created with American largesse to repatriate slaves, though most Blacks had been wise enough not to return to their ghastly motherland. Ebola was spreading fast in Liberia, where many thousands of new cases were expected over the coming three weeks, the World Health Organisation said (Guardian, 9 ix). "Transmission of the Ebola virus in Liberia is already intense and the number of new cases is increasing exponentially," the WHO said.

The organisation noted that motorbikes and regular taxis were "a hot source of potential virus transmission" because they were not disinfected in Liberia, where conventional Ebola control measures were “not having an adequate impact". The UN agency said aid partners {i.e. Western dummies ooops donors} ‘needed’ to scale up efforts against Ebola by three to four times in Liberia and elsewhere in west African countries battling the epidemic.

In Liberia, the disease had killed 1,089 people out of 1,871 cases – the highest national toll, the WHO said. Across Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, a total of 2,097 had died out of 3,944 cases. Inevitably, Black extremists could be found blaming the creation and spread of Ebola on the US Department of Defense....


 Nature (8 ix) provided a full account of C21 work on the genetics of IQ, race, violence and sexuality – by such scholars as Christopher Chabris, Stephen Hsu, Bruce Lahn and Robert Plomin.

 There was much cautious pussy-footing around the ‘sensitivities’ of fanatically dysgenic colleagues who wanted to get on identifying and ‘helping’ foetuses having monstrous genetic problems that could, if preserved, fuel ‘health service’ job creation for generations ahead; but there was no immediate cause for anxiety about eugenics since even IQ had turned out to be rather more polygenic than even the London School had estimated – with no single gene contributing more than a third of an IQ point and with research being likely to require a million subjects before a passably full list of genes for the variation could be provided with scientific authority.

Apparently the strict ‘narrow’ heritability of IQ was reckoned to be about 0.50 – as long estimated by Cyril Burt and in The g Factor – although the ‘broad’ heritability (including G x E interactions and G,E covariance) would be higher. {At least the leisurely pace of advance ensured the researchers would keep their jobs....}


  The state to which English politicos and their lawyer co-traitors had reduced England was dramatically demonstrated as railway staff refused to help an old lady who had fallen down an escalator because they had not been ‘trained’ in elfin safety.

When an elderly woman fell down an escalator at bustling Leeds train station, one might have expected rail staff to rush to her aid. But astonishingly, they refused to help her. And their reason? They had not been trained in ‘people-handling’. The extraordinary excuse was given by Northern Rail workers, who stood just yards away and shamefully let passengers instead tend to the shocked woman (D.Mail, 10 ix).


 The subject of IQ got an unaccustomed mention in MSM as correspondent Kenneth Hynes (of London, N7) was allowed to say (Daily Telegraph, 10 ix):

....A repeated IQ test for all pupils throughout their school careers would allow us to compare actual [exam] results with reasonably expected results and provide a good objective measure of the value added by individual teachers as well as schools.

{Naturally, the need to provide and respond to such value-added educational results had been repeatedly stressed in The g Factor (1996) – pp. 94, 159, 181.}


 Even as Barry Hussein Obarmy told Americans (10 ix) that he would start bombing ISIL fanatics in Iraq and Syria (whom he was already droning), he took the multiculti trouble to insist he would not be bombing Muslims. “Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not Islamic,” Obama said, speaking from the state floor of the White House residence. “No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.”

{How convenient – sparing the President from having to say he planned to go through the motions of defending Christians, Jews, Shitites and Yazids from mass-murdering Sunnis! But fancy Obarmy not knowing that ‘IS’ stood for ‘Islamic State’ and that 100% of its aficionados were Muslim.}


After two decades of unfailing support for PeeCee, the BBC found itself confronted by a Manchester police officer who (under conditions of strict anonymity, his ten-minute statement being read by another – R4, 12 ix, 13:30) was prepared (once) to mention the dread word ‘Pakistani’ when referring referring to the abducters, molesters, pimps, traffickers and rapists of White weenies in Rotherham.

The officer was quite clear that the young ‘scrubbers’ [as cops called them] were given low priority by police, whose politically supplied ‘target’ of ‘community cohesion’ was of far greater importance than arresting Pak taxidrivers, kebab-restauranteurs and grocers who were, after all, giving weenies a better time (with even pretences of love) than the gals {victims of socialist championing of fatherlessness} got in children’s homes {run by brain-addled ‘social workers’}.

Asked about the lately accepted press estimate that 1,400 young slags had been involved around the Manchester-Bradford-Sheffield triangle, the cop reckoned this a massive underestimate – he thought Rotherham and Rochdale alone had one new reported case to consider (and dismiss) every day, with abuse continuing at full steam right up to the present despite occasional convictions.

{Such was Britoid multiculturalism. Watch out, America and Australia – it’s coming your way!}

{These revelations of irrepressible Pak libido came as Pak-trained ‘respected neurosurgeon’ Nafees Hamid, 50, went on trial for fourteen incidents of impromptu unzipping, lewd remarks, lascivious groping, simulated sex and asking for completely irrelevant demonstration of masturbatory techniques while assessing female patients for brain damage at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital c.2012 – D.Mail, 12 ix. By 2014, most British cases of sex abuse by doctors, as adjudicated by the General Medical Council, involved Pakistanis or Arabs.}


 As Scotland approached the Sep.18 referendum on separating from England that had been weirdly arranged for it by Britain’s main political parties, it could be said that no racial issue was involved: for the racial/ethnic divide of the British Isles (Celtic/Catholic vs Anglo-Saxon Protestant) ran principally from west to east, not from north to south. But this would be superficial in two ways.

First, the momentum of the Scotnat campaign came from the SNP having managed by socialist promises to seize 30% of Labour’s traditional Irish-Catholic vote in Glasgow, thus pitting Scotland’s west (and north) in a pretty fair fight with the country’s east (and south).

Second, momentum was maintained, when not by frank racial hostility to ’the English’, then by hostility to ‘Team Westminster’ which had already done so much damage to Britain (not least by mass third-world immigration) as to render the 307-year-old nation a far less attractive entity to which to belong than it had been in the days of Empire (which had supplied so many Scots with jobs).

The SNP had even compared the Scots’ ‘predicament’ to that of South Africa’s Blacks under apartheid. This obviously showed woeful ignorance of the rigours of apartheid; but there was something refreshing about no-holds-barred, PeeCee-disrespecting, nationalist opposition to the ludicrous conventional multicult politics which had brought Britain economic downfall (for the third time since 1945 under Labour) and only a dysgenic prospect of UK-backed casino banking for the long-term future. Every cloud has a silver lining....

    Amusingly, Scotnats in south Edinburgh came up with a slogan that voters should “Follow the Pied Piper of Niddrie on the short march to freedom” – evidently unaware that the Pied Piper of Hamelin had let his hundreds of child followers to perdition.


Unable to admit it was at war with (and indeed had already been invaded by) Islam and kindred low-IQ and superstitious desperadoes, Europe – no longer united against Communism or enjoying the backing of a White America (which had itself twice elected a leftist Black Muslim Kenyan pacifist booby ‘President’ in the hope of thus solving its own homegrown racial problems) – was on the brink of break-up.

A week before Scotland voted on whether to break away from the United Kingdom, Catalan separatists in north-eastern Spain hoped at least 1 million people would take to the streets in Barcelona and across Catalonia to demand a secession vote. The central government in Madrid insisted that would be illegal.

Several hours before protests began, Catalonia regional leader Artur Mas said his government was not wavering from plans to hold a secession referendum on Nov.9, even though experts said an attempt was sure to be blocked Spain's Constitutional Court.

Polls suggesting Scotland's "Yes" independence camp could win their Sep.18 vote had energized Catalan separatists, Corsicans who wanted to break away from France and Flemish speakers in Belgium demanding more autonomy, independence or union with the Netherlands.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, September 08, 2014


Following national outrage about the unprosecuted sexual abuse of ‘White-trash’ weenies in Rochdale and Rotherham (q.v.), UK cops announced they would soon be charging hundreds of men, mainly of Pakistani origin, with a bumper crop of violations of youngsters, not uncommonly including grooming, drugging, pimping, petrol-dousing, rape and gang rape (Sunday Mail, 31 viii). Alleged perpetrators lived in “many areas” (insisted Britain’s mealy-mouthed peecee politicos), but especially in and around Manchester.

    The Rotherham scandal had led three Labour MPs and the Chief Crown Prosecutor for Northwest England (himself with a mid-Eastern name, though born in Birmingham) to express discontent that multiculturalism had gone too far and that even they themselves – pillars of the multicult community – had been made to fear accusations of racism when they exposed Pak proclivities (Sunday Telegraph, 31 viii). Sex rackets involving weenies had apparently increased greatly in the previous fifteen years {perhaps as young sex-starved Paks came to realize the chance that Whitey’s peecee tyranny was giving them}.

    Britain’s first Muslim peer, Lord Ahmed, was moved to admit he himself had been shocked when he arrived in Rotherham from Kashmir in the 1980s and quickly discovered extensive sexual abuse perpetrated by his kinsmen. He wrote for the Mail (1 ix):

"...Many mosques have no idea how to lead or guide young men struggling to come to terms with being a Muslim in a modern country. These men {well, teenagers} need help with issues such as sex education, teenage pregnancy, drink and drugs – all the things other young people have to cope with. But they are taboo in most mosques. If a British-Pakistani boy tried to talk to an imam about it, he would look at him blankly.

    Many mosques are dangerously cut off from the rest of society, rooted in the ancient world, not the modern one. This approach is reflected by the way imams behave. Many rarely mix with other faiths, which is wrong. They should be encouraged to visit other places of worship to break down barriers between faiths and learn how others tackle these problems.This inward-looking view is mirrored by the proliferation of satellite TV stations, on which rival British-based Sunni and Shia imams attack each other."

    In the Guardian (1 ix), the chairwoman of a national child protection charity claimed there were “huge numbers” of sex gang victims by the 1990s and that a 2002 research by the UK Home Office had been "effectively suppressed" according to Professorette Alexis Jay who wrote the new report into events in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.

    By 2 ix (Guardian), South Yorkshire police (headed by an evasive wimp called Crompton, himself reduced to pulp by a televised Parliamentary Committee, 2 ix) graciously agreed to discussions about whether to appoint ooops find lackeys from another force who could discuss whether to discuss and appoint ‘entirely independent’ peeceeified goons who might gently investigate Rotherham’s criminal anti-racism ooops community cohesion programme....;

and Esau Milliletre’s London Labour Party suspended, pending dinners ooops inquiries, four members (three of them longstanding Rotherham councillors, two of them with Pak-style names). These moves followed a BBC Panorama documentary screened on Monday night in which the Home Office official who had investigated the sexual exploitation of children in Rotherham accused the council of being involved in the unauthorised removal of information from her office.

Her report in 2002 had suggested there were even then more than 270 victims of the scandal, which was finally exposed with revelations that at least 1,400 children were abused (q.v.). She told Panorama she had sent her report to both the Rotherham council and the Home Office on a Friday, but when she returned on Monday she found her office had been raided. "They'd gained access to the office and taken my data, so out of a number of filing cabinets there was just one drawer emptied and it was emptied of my data. It had to be an employee of the council," she said.

The Home Office researcher, who was not named by Panorama, also said she had been accused of being insensitive when she told one official that most of the perpetrators were from Rotherham's Pakistani community. A female colleague talked to her about the incident. "She said you must never refer to that again – you must never refer to Asian men," the HORU researcher said.

    {Just why no mosque was closed (or razed) per each Muesli atrocity was a mystery – except in so far as PM Daft Dave was busy – as he burbled to Parliament -- arranging (yet further) discussions of discussions about how to protect the ‘uman rights of beastly fanatics who used Britain as their base for beheading Yazidis, Christians and Shitites of Mesopotamia, not to mention for enjoying Rotherham’s weenie sluts. In such circumstances of Muesli invasion and ‘liberal’ collapse, Brits of parliamentary persuasion – suppressed over 50 years by Labour’s steady erosion of free speech -- could only punish their politicos by blogging away and voting UKIP.}


 A new step in the stupidifying ooops multiracializing of Europe took place as a multi-millionaire husband-and-wife team in Malta had a 140-foot ship (‘Phoenix 1’) converted (with two inflatable fast boats and two helicopter drones armed with the latest imaging technology) for lifting hundreds of would-be-migrants Africans per trip out of the Mediterranean (apparently at the behest of the Pope) and handing them to the Italian navy (D.Mail, 1 ix) – which would wave them on to France where they would join the 2K ‘refugees’ (etc), some of them knife-wielding, waiting in Calais to intimidate a lorry driver to take them to the British welfare utopia of which they dreamed, unless they could perchance rise higher as fruit pickers, servants to Guardian readers, taxi drivers coping with Britain’s late-night drinkers with only blowjobs as an occasional reward, or border control agents appointed under equal opportunity legislation.

{Not that the British welfare state would last long: if Scottish residents voted YES for separation, England would end up at last in anti-welfare hands and Scotland would never afford the welfare that it promised itself; and if Scots punters voted NO, much of the UK welfare budget would have to be transferred into policing to damp down Scotnat outrage. But employers – whether English or Scottish -- would lap up the slave labour in a country which had destroyed the education of 90% of its own young by socialism and been so arranged by its politicos as not to have anyone – apart from perhaps the Royals – who thought more than two years ahead.}


Australia’s Queensman PM, Tony Abbott, announced that “extreme force” was legitimate against the ISIS/ISIL/IS loons of Syria/Iraq and sent an aircraft to parachute machine guns, grenades and rocket launchers to the Turds of northern Iraq (Guardian, 2 ix) – rather than wait for Nato-member Turkey (which had the largest army in Europe) and fantastically USA-armed Saudi, Qatar and Kuwait to take up their own responsibilities to control the madder Sunnis.

{It was good to see youthful Oz impetuosity activated, even if Oz had no idea as to how to control its own Mueslis, imported under its latter-day Non-White immigration policy.}


With the West’s knicker-twisted multicult politicos having failed to squash even simple-minded misogynistic Islam (which chiefly offered its boys obedient wives and 72 virgins for the after-life), and in particular having wasted blood and treasure in a decade of non-warfare in Afghooniland (where, by 2014, no American dared venture outside the country’s few ‘cities’) and Eyeraq (scheduled for a decade of terrifying Solunni vs Shitite civil war), having its economy teeter on the brink of another non-understood crash, and having poked the Russian bear, Western electorates turned increasingly to NONE OF THE ABOVE, prepared to give UKIP a chance in England, the FN a chance in France, ‘Alternative Deutschland’ a chance in Germany and the SNP a chance on even more independence for welfare-dependent but all-White-and-higher-IQ-Asian Scotland (independence opposed by all of England’s four top political parties and by 90% of Scottish big businesses).

Was there something to be said for democracy after all? Not perhaps in heartland USA, where Pres. Barry played golf while Detroit cut off its own water supplies, where Whites were in trouble whenever they shot a Black, and Hispanics upped their 30-year invasion of the south-west (now landing on the beaches of San Diego); for White Americans would long hope for a ‘federal’ solution of apartheid if only they could think how to do it (even Harvard had a hundred-strong ‘Federal Society’).

But crowded Europe did not have that option, so could only turn in fury on the peecee artistes who had flooded it (not Scotland, thank heavens, for the Glasgow Irish had done sterling work repelling gypsies and other third-worlders sent up from London) with riff-raff and continued to increase the supply across the Mediterranean – having mindlessly overthrown Libya’s Col. Gadawfu who had helped brake the flow.

Slowly (far too slowly), but fairly surely, Westerners were learning to say NO to the globalizing loons who had assumed control of the EUSSR, USA, UN, IMF, ECHR, NATO and UK – but not of Western people.


 French cops’ machine guns were on prominent display as the gendarmerie nobly defended welfare-state Britain from invasion by hundreds of Araboid ‘refugees’ – just a fraction of the thousands encamped around Calais (in squalid squats spreading to the Belgian border) who regarded Britain as El Dorado. Not that the Araboids payed any attention to PeeCee-addled cops, for they knew Europe’s politicos would not allow them to be shot – so they had to be fire-hosed instead as they broke through gates and rushed a ramp to commandeer a ferry that would take them to heaven in Dover (D.Mail, 4 ix).

Who would pay for the fun-and-games? Well, the Mayor of Calais was understandably insistent that British taxpayers fork out for the inconvenience to her townsfolk of Brits making their country a magnet for the wretched of the earth. But British politicos (though briefly returned to Westminster from their six-month-per-year holiday) agreed to feign complete indifference to the mess which their socialist stupidity and conservative compassion were making.


 As the UK Parliament and Nato met briefly for dining and drinking and saying how they would like to ‘do something’ about Eyesore beheadings in the Levant and Puto’s rapid advance through the settlements of south-east Ukraine which that country’s Kiev government had smashed up through random shelling, a fine summary of the useless West’s self-inflicted predicament was provided at ‘living in a madhouse’ – though sparing discussion of the stream of Araboid ‘refugees’ flooding in across the Mediterranean (with papal, Italian and French tolerance seeing them through to Calais, where they took knives to the throats of drivers headed for Dover), of the West having rendered 20% of its White young unemployable (despite their ‘degrees’), and of the continued hyperbreeding of illiterate and superstitious Ebola-spreading Africans.

Apparently, no less than 26% of 3M Britain-resident Mueslis freely declared they had no loyalty to Britain – making them a more unconscionable problem than ever was the 1M ‘Irish community’, with whose tiny 1K-strong IRA wing the wretched White traitors of the UK had had to declare a score draw after eighty years of bombing, maiming and killing (little of it by UK authorities).

    Mercifully, Puto solved the West’s problem of commitment to a diverse Ukraine by persuading Kiev dictator Porridgenko to sign a 7-point peace plan which Puto had itemised on a fag packet – though the deal, in which Puto denied designs on Odessa, scuppered the Nato shindig in Cardiff which was still blustering about more sanctions on Russia and a “multinational rapid reaction spearhead force” (4K squaddies to face Russia’s 400K, to be ready for ‘rapid’ action by the end of 2015!...) even as Porridgenko announced his capitulation.


 The lordliness of Britain’s multi-millionaire multi-culti class of politicos went on display as PM Daft Dave Cameron said that he would “emphatically” not resign if Scotland voted to leave the United Kingdom. The UK Prime Minister mouthed it would “break my heart” if Scotland were to vote “Yes” in the Sep.18  poll, but insisted his job would not be under threat. His astonishing play-acting came as polls showed that Alex Salmond’s SNP’s separatist “Yes” campaign had closed the gap with just twelve days to go before the Clottish referendum.

{Perhaps there was something to be said for an Eton education after all: one might not know what Magna Carta is, but ‘broken-heartedly’ clinging on to power was second nature – albeit prosaically assisted by Labour incompetence in losing forty of its 300 Westminster MPs by no longer (since 2007, when Rev Bliar gave way to Grumpy Prod Gordon and Jewish Milliletre) having the Catholic leadership that was required by the Glasgow Irish.}


Britain’s best-known charity for boosting Black hyper-breeding, Oxfam, was told to keep its nose out of politics and ‘concentrate on its knitting’ – by a surprisingly robust new government appointee, Brooks Walmart (D.Mail, 5 ix). In his first major speech since his appointment, as ‘minister for civil society’ (as a token male to balance PM DD’s fat lesbian frumps and witches), Mr Newmart managed to say (before being hauled off by DD’s Obersturmfuehrerines): “We really want to try and keep charities and voluntary groups out of the realms of politics.”

Nearly half of previous Labour PM Gordon Brown’s Downing Street aides had been discovered to have gone on to ‘work’ for charities and think-tanks – positions from which they continued guerrilla war on the Tories and all British realists and patriots. Eleven out of the 25 ‘special advisers’ who had worked for Mr Brown when he was prime minister in 2009 had taken roles at various ‘charitable’ organisations which critics claimed were being used as vehicles for a shameless pro-Labour multicult agenda, designed to help destroy what remained of Western civilization.

 Charities had been previously banned by law in England from giving support or funding to political parties; but in 2008 Mr Brown (who felt guilty about going to E.LU. precociously at age 16 – a product of sensible streaming) tweaked the rules so they could join political campaigns and spread the socialist-egalitarian message. At another ginormous ‘charity,’ Save the Children's CEO earned $387,000 in 2012 that didn't include pension payments and perks. Every single penny of that package would have come out of donations which naἵve punters thought would be directly helping to pay for food, clean water or schooling for an ‘underprivileged’ child which had been born thanks to papal (and Muslim) interdiction of contraception and kept alive by Western medicine.


Headhunters (2014; q.v.) provided an admirable and amusing account of the early (1898) anthropological/psychological Cambridge effort in New Guinea and surrounds; and it reasonably stressed at once the ‘arrogance’, intelligence and romanticism of the star expeditionary, the Anglo-Scottish William McDougall (‘Mighty Mac’), who would go on to become Britain’s top psychologist of the 20th century (with the Chair of Psychology at Harvard to his name for five years, till he fell out with the rising behaviourists who scorned his interests in instincts, inheritance, the subconscious and parapsychology).

McD himself, though forever falling out with the dry-and-dusty nitpickers of Cambridge, the near-relativist idealist philosophers of Oxford, and the Harvard girls who wanted to believe that behaviourism could yield them a perfect child, went on to sustain a dynamic psychology which, though he himself became academically neglected, would re-surface in the Nobel-winning instinct doctrines of Lorenz, Tinbergen and von Frisch, in the nativism of Chomsky, and in the evolutionary psychology of the likes of Richard Dawkins.


 As Bonnie Clotland floundered in its anti-Thatcherism (though Thatch had rescued Scotland’s ratepayers from Labour depredations and kept the Clyde as Europe’s main nuclear bulwark against 1980 Communism), fine pieces by TgF-backing Sean Thomas and Nato- (if also RC- and mysticism-) backing Roger Scruton rightly deplored the revealed uselessness of the British left to marshall its own Glaswegian Irish Catholic supporters of a century -- said supporters (of whom a third planned to vote YES to separation) detecting that the left and its peecee goons had already kicked the heart out of British freedom and that the Scots might as well go it alone (before the tidal wave of ‘British’ Blacks and Muslims arrived).

Whether Scotland itself (with its vast east-west and north-south divisions) was a nation was unclear; but its punters saw that Britain itself had failed in repeatedly surrendering to EUSSR, ECHR, Green non-energy, a modern much-dining Nato which proposed to take on Russia with 3K troops and the Mesopotamian Caliphate with an occasional drone, and above all to PeeCee infection which allowed no Anglo-Saxon pride or freedom.


The goons of invasion-inviting peecee England got their result as a popular 82-yr great-grandmother (of 1945 Italian origin) was beheaded while reading quietly in her London garden by a 25-yr jobless druggie Black Muslim convert called ‘Fat Nick’ (who had just previously been videoed failing to pay for a quarter-pound-burger and then beheading a few flowers and two cats) (D.Mail, 6 ix).

Splendid job creation was provided for plastic-coated English ‘police’ as they smashed doors and windows around Edmonton to facilitate ‘escape’ from the crazed killer; and no less than ten fuzz were eventually deemed necessary in a magistrate’s court to control the animal – at a time when English police forces were declining to investigate burglaries, instead insisting the burgled householders do their own Columbo-style sleuthing.

{Anything rather than turn the BM nutcase over to a Select Parliamentary Committee of Labour multicults and watch the resultant publicity for Islam! Yes, England had ruined itself by hyper-‘polite’ PeeCee – a disease from which the Glasgow Irish did not suffer.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, August 31, 2014


 Determined to throw as much money to retardate Blacks as possible, mulatto Pres. Obarmy announced, at a Washington multifart drink-in for 45 Efrican autocrats and their 445 wives ooops secretaries, that he would shower $30B “investment” upon the Dark Continent – without the slightest requirement of return (though Barry did some finger-wagging about African bribery and corruption – about which he would have known from his Chicago experience). Mercifully, the hopeless waste of America’s White-guilt largesse would not require White boots on the ground or any other serious supervision – for it was not about empire or civilization or liberation but just about Barack Hussein’s ‘legacy’ as a Nobelist White-fleecer.


 Emotional intelligence, defined by Coleman (2008) as the ability to monitor one's own and other people's emotions, to discriminate between different emotions and label them appropriately, and to use emotional information to guide thinking and behaviour, was first hypothesized by Harvard’s g-doubting Howard Gardner as a form of intelligence that would give low-IQ people another chance to score. But this ability is weak in psychopaths, so according to Richard Lynn’s race realism (PAID, 2002; AmRen, vii 2002), Blacks would be expected to have lower emotional intelligence than Whites. This is what Whtman et al. found in a study of 209 Black and 125 White applicants for the job of firefighter, who were tested with the 16-item Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale. Whites scored significantly higher than Blacks at 6.41, with Blacks at 6.14, and the difference equal to approximately a third of a standard deviation (Internat.J.Selection & Assessment, vi 2014; AmRen, 25 viii).


 As if their cowardly adoption of peecee thought control had not sufficently wrecked their modest reputation for liberalism (which Mrs Thatcher had done her best to bolster), British ‘Conservatives’ (with incompetent face-lifted ‘nice, not nasty’ Topwitch Mudda Theresa May leading the charge), announced they planned legislation to jail husbands who were unduly “controlling” (e.g. requiring wives to show receipts for expenditure) (Telegraph, 20 viii, David Barrett).

Thus was further approached the communist ideal of destroying the family and making the state the only legitimate authority – though, sparing feminoids themselves from charges of bullying, there was to be no requirement that wives desist from over-talkativeness and nagging.

Already, Coalition legislation had intruded into personal, subjective and barely ascertainable matters by requiring that children should not be shown ‘cruel’ emotional indifference – in the belief that children would benefit from having parental judgment undermined and from their being cast upon the ‘love’ and intelligence of the state (which had already got levels of child literacy down to those of the 1890s). No squeak was expected from either official liberals or the Church at the proposed criminalization of husbandly discretion.

GENETICISTS BATTLE A Troublesome Inheritance IN Nature

Whingeing by scores of geneticists about Nicholas Wade’s Genes, Race and Human History (q.v.) reached Nature (26 viii), with supposedly leading luminaries complaining that their work had been misinterpreted. Details of what Wade had got wrong were in distinctly short supply*; but apparently one aggrieved academic thought there were fourteen races (rather than the five favoured by Wade and the mighty anthropologist Carlton Coon**), and all were adamant (without offering the slightest evidence) that there were (amazingly) no cognitive or civilizational differences at all between races ooops clusters.

{Poor Wade! – He wasn’t even given any credit for politely focussing on differences between Caucasians and East Asians and largely avoiding the far more dramatic and well-attested phenomenon of low African IQ and its sequelae.}

* A review in New York Times by David Dobbs (10 vii) had offered more hope for hysterical anti-racists by suggesting that defective genes were somehow matched by the “reparative epigenetics” of one Sharon Moalem. But Dobbs could not bring himself even to mention intelligence, IQ or any London Schooler other than Galton; and he had to admit that Moalem “tries too hard to entertain” and “is loaded with weird findings and great stories” {another Oliver Sacks, apparently....}.

** Darwin’s disciple, Thomas Henry Huxley, had also backed a fivefold classification (1870): Australoids, Mongoloids/Amerindians, Negroids, Nordics [‘Xanthochroi’], and fringe Europeans [the darker ‘Malancroi’].

(Historian-broadcaster Ben Shephard notes (2014, Headhunters): “All the great men of late-Victorian science firmly believed in a hierarchy of races; none more strongly than Darwin, whatever his modern whitewashers would have us believe.”)


 Thirteen years after 9/11, which was committed by Arab Muslims from Saudi, the American and British publics, which had spent hundreds of lives and thousands of billions of dollars pointlessly bringing demakrazy to ethnically divided Eyeraq, ordinary airline travellers were still deemed to need daily lessons in how Mueslis (even swarthy black-clad young male Mueslis) were just like themselves. As five thuggish-looking Mueslis were photoed boarding a plane from London to Turkey (en route for Syria) without any conspicuous interevention from ‘airport security,’ the Daily Mail’s Richard Littlejohn wrote (26 viii):

"....CCTV footage would almost certainly show middle-aged, middle-class men and women, on their way to spend a week in Marbella with their grandchildren, being subjected to intimate body-searches.
 How many times have we seen young Asian  men with backpacks pass seamlessly through security while Howard and Hilda from Hemel Hempstead are forced to stand and watch as the contents of their hand-luggage are examined with forensic precision?

    Over the years since 9/11, I’ve brought you all kinds of daft stories about airport security. A few months ago, a screener at Heathrow even confiscated a tiny model gun from a model of Woody, the cowboy in Toy Story. Children aren’t immune from the ridiculous rules imposed from on-high by risk-averse imbeciles."
  Mail reader John Thompson has copied me in on correspondence he has been having with the head of security at Edinburgh Airport after his heavily pregnant wife and two-year-old daughter were subjected to body-scanning equipment and intimate physical searches. He asked, not unreasonably, what security threat was posed by a child and her seven-months pregnant mother? Mr Thompson received a reply written in classic jobsworth-speak, which didn’t answer his main point. He wrote back, exasperated: ‘It’s time common sense was applied.’

    Don’t hold your breath, John! Common sense plays no part in ‘security’. We keep being told that the war on terrorism must be ‘intelligence-led’. But all we get is stupidity, especially at airports. I don’t blame the staff, who are only doing what they are told on pain of the sack. It’s the fault of pusillanimous politicians and the ‘human rights’ lobby. It is also frighteningly easy for would-be jihadists to come and go as they please because of our dysfunctional border controls.

    Thanks to the efforts of the Funny People, at least one of the ‘Britani Brigade’ caught on camera at Gatwick, Mashadur Choudhury from Portsmouth, was arrested when he returned home and is now languishing in prison. Apparently, Choudhury came back to Britain with his tail between his legs after ‘failing the Isis selection process’. Run that by me again. Isis has a selection process?....


It’s not exactly news that China is setting itself up as a new global superpower, is it? While Western civilization chokes on its own gluttony like a latter-day Marlon Brando, China continues to buy up American debt and lock away the world’s natural resources. But now, not content to simply laugh and make jerk-off signs as they pass us on the geopolitical highway, they’ve also developed a state-endorsed genetic-engineering project.

    At BGI Shenzhen [pictured below], scientists have collected DNA samples from 2,000 of the world’s smartest people and are sequencing their entire genomes in an attempt to identify the alleles which determine human intelligence. Apparently they’re not far from finding them, and when they do, embryo screening will allow parents to pick their brightest zygote [out of about a hundred] and potentially bump up every generation's intelligence by five to 15 IQ points. Within a couple of generations, competing with the Chinese on an intellectual level will be like challenging Lena Dunham to a getting-naked-on-TV contest.

{This enormous programme was a natural refinement of the eugenic policies being pursued for miles around Peking in the 1980s – by unofficially letting better-educated Chinese and Party officials off the one-child policy. As a committee member of the Galton Institute in the 1990’s, I had suggested China would welcome having its eugenic experiment monitored, guided and researched by the Institute [the former Eugenics Society] but the Galton was not interested.}


 The time-honoured methodological anxiety that twins might have their well-known similarities in personality merely because they look alike was examined by top psychologist Nancy Segal (California State University) (New York Times, 26 viii). She was able to compare the personal similarities of twins with the similarities of unrelated chance ‘lookalikes’; and found simply no significant similarities in personality between the latter – thus disproving the favourite environmentalist conjecture. Nor did the lookalikes form the special bonds readily found between re-united identical twins.


Amazingly, it turned out that Rotherham (South Yorkshire) cops and child care functionaries had turned  a blind eye to at least 1,400 cases of gross child sex abuse across 16 years – even though many cases had involved physical force, dousing with petrol, threatening with guns, grooming, trafficking, abduction, gang rape and forced voyeurism of other pre-teen girls being raped.

The vast majority of these horrid cases had involved White girls (usually consigned to children’s homes) being pursued by men occasionally admitted by MSM to have been ‘Asian’ (in fact Pakistani Muslim – as all but one were); and cops and social workers had been afraid of accusations of ‘racism’ if they took action (BBC News, 26 viii, 10:00).

Former Labour MP for Rotherham, Denis MacShame (lately imprisoned for fraud), admitted: “There was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat, if I may put it like that. Perhaps, yes, as a true Guardian reader and liberal Leftie, I suppose I didn’t want to raise that too hard.” He told the Independent (31 viii) that he had been threatened with the sack by Blair-creature Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in 2003 for saying that Muslims would have to chose between the British way or the way of terrorists” – a remark made after a south-Yorkshire Muesli had tried to blow up Jews in a Tel Aviv bar (though finally killing only himself).

Senior Rotherham officials had actually told juniors to set aside their anxieties about the barbarism in the interests of “community cohesion” (Daily Telegraph, 28 viii, Allison Pearson,* ‘In the face of such terrifying evil, who is the racist now?’)

    Despite Labour pleading, no resignation was forthcoming from the Labour councillor in charge during five years of Rotherham’s children’s services – apparently, in his own mind, the requirement to be anti-racist trumped even the requirement to be paedohysterical, and anyway he had moved on to a £85Kpa job as Police and Crime Commissioner (which presumably gave him even bigger opportunities to shelter ‘ethnic communities’ accused of crimes). Nor did his replacement, one Joyce Thacker, who by 2014 was paid £130K for her troubles, head for the door.

The Guardian, while insisting that ‘some’ non-Asian perpetrators had been involved, called the 16-year tolerance “shameful” and “almost beyond belief” (27 viii). The journalists who tried to expose the (still ongoing) scandal had been denounced by authorities as liars and racists. Similar cases of Pakistanis treating White ‘in care’ weenies as contemptible prostitutes to be bought with sweets, ciggies, peach brandy and taxi rides (paid for in blowjobs while being taken to the homes of other abusers in the girls’ school lunch hours) – without fear of recrimination from their socialism-destroyed fatherless-family relatives -- had been uncovered in Rochdale, Derby and Oxford (Cowley).

    By August, 2014, five Pakistanis had been jailed in Rotherham and a further 30 were under investigation (by a grand total of three police officers).

    South Yorkshire cops had not been so slow to act in the case of Sir Cliff Richard (q.v.), sending twenty officers (and the BBC threw in a helicopter) for a five-hour raid of the pop superstar’s home when just a single accusation came their way of groping of a boy in the 1960s. By contrast, instead of going after the villainous Pakistanis, police threatened some of the Rotherham girls with charges of drunkenness and curfew violations at their care homes.

    Rotherham, an old steel town near leftist Sheffield, with a Mayor called Shaukat Ali {!} and lots of ‘regeneration’ grants, had been Labour-run since 1933 (and had a longer history of ‘progressively’ supporting American separatism and turning the chapel of its rather splendid minster into, first, a town jail, and then a tobacconist’s shop). Though protest had given it eleven UKIP councillors, its vastly overpaid dim officials had felt enough confidence in PeeCee actually to remove an adopted child from parents discovered in the heresy of being UKIP supporters.

    As MSM found itself forced into mentioning race, the BBC produced a lady social worker from ghastly 20%-Pak Rochdale (the early-industrialized wool town between Oldham and Ramsbottom, lately best known for the paedofumbling of its grossly obese comic MP, Liberal Cyril Smith, in the 1970s) to say that Muesli abuse of (overwhelmingly White) girls persisted “on an industrial scale” (R4, 30 viii, 08:45).

For their part, Muslims supplied the BBC with a video in which an (unseen) audience (perhaps at a mosque) called out their agreement with a nice young male speaker who suggested that paedophiles and police be brought to book for crimes of which the Muslim community had apparently been told nothing.

*AP was optimistic enough to volunteer that “Rotherham may be the final nail in the coffin of multiculturalism.”


 After fifty years of agreeing first to prosecute ‘race hate speech’ and then to let employers sack employees (even academics) whose free speech had got them into trouble with the tirelessly shit-stirring tabloids (which increasingly had little to do, since all racist, sexist, ageist, homophobic, transphobic, obesoid and other-disablist fair comments were effectively banned by them and by bullied politicos), Britain’s official liberals found their supine indifference to liberty was allowing the hounding even of people who had merely made private ‘remarks.’ Yes, a top footie manager (see below) was being hauled over the coals and dumped for verdict before the Soccer-moron Association (of goofs converted to ‘kick it [racism] out of fitba’’ so as to preserve their postmodern religious credentials) for verdict on and salutary reproof of his naughtiness in personal email.

(Needless to say, millionaire ‘Malky’ Mackay’s actual ‘remarks’ about ‘Chinks’ and ‘gay snakes’ could not be reproduced in any family newspaper lest their transparent blokeish jocularity cause laughter at MSM’s po-faced troublemaking. Even the Daily Mail, which had once contented itself with paedohysteria to win cheap approval, felt obliged to say ‘Malky’ was ‘in the mire.’)


 To the private delight of many Englishmen, the day of Scottish separation from the UK drew nearer as a nervous Labour ex-Chancellor (wheeled out to do battle for the UK since Labour had the most interest – in keeping its forty Westminster seats in the once-industrial areas of Scotland’s ‘Central Belt’) got shafted* in TV debate with a bumptious First Minister Fish (who had already for years beaten Labour for seats in the dreary fat lesbian Scottish Parliament – the only lively feature of which was its way-over-budget Spanish-designed Holyrood building with a leaky roof).

How was this possible? It was not that there was a racial difference, for the real race differences in the UK ran from west to east (Glasgow vs Edinburgh; Lancashire vs Yorkshire; Wales vs south-East) rather than from north to south. No, the real reason was that England (83% of the UK) had lost the Empire through years of fighting Germany (with massive Scots help) then gone on to bankrupt itself further, first with years of socialism and then free-market cowboying (as the only thinkable method of labour discipline) followed by the 2008 crash, all the while managing to lose its friends at once in Europe, the Commonwealth and America.

Though all-White south-Yorkshire was more ethnically homogeneous than all-White Scotland (with its religious, linguistic and lifestyle differences), it was understandable that Scotland, having kept together its vast rural estates with its teeming Glasgow-Irish tenements through the religious language of socialism, would think of taking its own chances rather than become increasingly like banker-led Black and Mohammedan England.

It would be a gamble, whether to rely on Scotland’s natified slave labour from Ireland (with a sorry propensity to die at 54) or on the evidently unassimilable third-world hordes of England; but the globalization-backing City of London was prepared to take it – when even the Labour Party had lost its grip on Clotland. Whether nationalism or multiculturalism would be more successful long-term was uncertain (clearly HMG-backed casino-banking was more successful short-term); but (unmentionable and hoped-to-be-defunct) White racism and IQ-ism were not to be tried.

*A sample from Robert Henderson, our London correspondent:

"The second Darling vs Salmond debate on 25 August was even more depressing than the first. It might have been thought that having gone through one debate the palpable nervousness both showed the first time round  would have been largely gone.  In the event Salmond  was less nervous,  but Darling was  embarrassingly anxious.

    Whoever thought Darling was a safe pair of hands for this type of work was profoundly wrong. The man is woefully ill equipped for a one-to one-debate. Throughout he frequently fell into  stuttering and even when he did not – which was primarily when he was reading from prepared notes – his delivery was leaden. When Salmond attacked him Darling  seemed peevish; when the audience derided him or asked insulting questions he was utterly at sea. (example audience comment: “I think the  fundamental difference here is that the YES campaign are fighting passionately for the future of  Scotland; Alastair Darling and others are fighting passionately for their jobs”)  Darling  spent much of the debate staring blankly ahead  like a rabbit caught in a car’s headlights while Salmond stood looking at him grinning insultingly. Darling also waved his hands for emphasis far too much, while  his habit of pointing at Salmond was a sorry mistake.

    Darling also got his strategy wrong by concentrating heavily, almost obsessively,  on the point which he had laboured in the first debate,  namely, what Salmond would do if there was a vote for independence and Scotland was denied a currency union with the rest of the UK .  This is a seriously difficult question for Salmond,  but there  are only so many times a debating opponent can be prodded with the same weapon before the audience becomes restive, and restive is what they became here. The nadir of this Darling obsession came when the debate reached the section where the two politicians questioned each other. What was Darling’s first question? You’ve guessed it:  “What is your plan B for the currency?”  It was an open goal for Salmond who immediately taunted Darling with being a one-trick pony.

    The way Darling asked questions was also feeble. Not only did he keep repeating the same things, but time and again, he allowed Salmond to ask him questions when he, Darling,  was supposed to be grilling Salmond."


 As PM Daft Dave continued with the cowardly multiculturalism to which he had reduced his party and government -- seeing gypsy immigration doubling in a year, primary schools inundated by the high-quantity but low-quality sprogs of mad Mueslis and husbandless Blecks, Rotherham etc exposed as pandering to Pak rapism, and Britain’s threat level for terror attacks raised to ‘severe’ in preparation for the country welcoming home its jihadists from Syria – he suffered (while on his third beach holiday of the year) the sudden defection to UKIP (widely considered a racist/fascist/chauvinist/yagphobic/etc party) of respected MP Douglas Carswell – who honourably proposed to fight a by-election in his Clacton (Essex) seat to bring his constituents with him in his conversion.

    Born in 1971, Carswell had grown up in Uganda, where his parents worked as doctors among some of the world's poorest people. His father, Wilson Carswell, a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, diagnosed the first cases of HIV/Aids in Africa in the early 1980s. Carswell went to St Andrew's School, Turi, in Kenya and then Charterhouse in the UK. He studied history at the University of East Anglia and at King's College, London. Before entering politics, Carwell worked in television and then investment management. He also worked in the Conservative party's policy unit while it was run by David Cameron.


Israel’s leftist newspaper, Haaretz, was shocked to find how little the multiculti-promoting agenda of American Jewry had proved influential in Israel itself (23 viii):

“For me, personally, Arabs are something I can’t look at and can’t stand,” a 10th-grade girl from a high school in the central part of the country says in abominable Hebrew. “I am tremendously racist. I come from a racist home. If I get the chance in the army to shoot one of them, I won’t think twice. I’m ready to kill someone with my hands, and it’s an Arab. In my education I learned that . . . their education is to be terrorists, and there is no belief in them. I live in an area of Arabs, and every day I see these Ishmaelites, who pass by the [bus] station and whistle. I wish them death.”

    The student’s comments appear in a chapter devoted to ethnicity and racism among youth from a forthcoming book, Scenes from School Life (in Hebrew) by Idan Yaron and Yoram Harpaz. The book is based on anthropological observations made by Dr. Yaron, a sociologist, over the course of three years in a six-year, secular high school in the Israeli heartland -- “the most average school we could find,” says Harpaz, a professor of education.

However, Israelis were apparently happy to have their gene pool complemented by suitable semi-Gentiles (who had supposedly, in ancient history, especially in Russia, ‘stolen’ blonde Jewish genes, along with Jewish money....):

Her name is Alona Tal. She is a popular Israeli singer-actress and was born in Herzliya, Israel. After serving with the Israel Defense Force, she moved to New York and married a Hispanic film director.

Evidently, the Israeli-Jewish concept of race could be pretty all-embracing – though never including cousin Arabs.... How extraordinary that such flexibility of thinking coincided with the imposition of rigid anti-racism (i.e. anti-anti-Semitism) and multiculti guilt on the Whites of the West!


In response to a splendid Indie article detailing the exhausting lesson-planning and paperwork-filled 72-hour working week of the modern British skuleteacher (30 viii), an equally fine but more succinct reply appeared in correspondence:

"....the cause of this problem? Socialism -- and its malign obsession for "equality". Only a mad man would insist on mixed ability classes. Identify the bright, eager-to-learn children early on and focus on them. It's not our responsibility to teach non-English-speaking children. Their parents should pay for schooling until the child is confident in English in both its spoken and written modes. Put violent, disruptive and "special needs" children in separate institutions and keep them away from those who can, and want, to learn. 90% of this man's problems would then disappear."

{I cannot for the life of me recall any sign of ‘planning’ in the lessons – well, sessions – by the grammar school masters who won me three Oxbridge places and final college and state scholarships; and the only regular paperwork was for a weekly two minutes in the collection of dinner money. The masters simply conversed about what they knew – and had published in book form for any boys wanting to get into the grisly detail. Like a university, till exam fever took the lunis over!

Sadly, modern state schoolteachers only know socialism (topped off by finally repressive PeeCee) yet cannot blatantly teach this for fear of ultimate parental wrath – so they end up having nothing to say from the heart, and certainly no pictures of Nelson’s Emma Hamilton or Vermeer’s pearl ear-rings on their walls. – OK, I had to discover Goya’s and Velazquez’s nudes for myself. It’s called initiative + bookshops + the confidence of knowing what Magna Carta is, why Charles I’s head had to be taken off [think: high taxation to help the French fight the Dutch] and that all’s right with the world [apart from the Frogs’ usually daft murderous experiments in killing Christians].}


 A weenie bride could be bought in Britain thanks to the spread of ‘Roma’ gypsies. Just £3.5K as a deposit would secure a nubile number, estimated film-maker Ben Steele (Independent, 31 viii). According to strict ‘Pachiv’ gypsy traditions, marriages could be arranged by parents considerably before the UK age of consent (16). Apparently: “On a windswept evening in late March, Sanko [48 and father of nine], his son Adrian [14] and other members of their family [which had moved to Oldham in 2012] travel to Esme's home, with a plan to formally propose the marriage to her family. Esme [15] has no idea what is about to happen. She still goes to school and, as far as contact with Adrian goes, she has had only one dance with him at a Gypsy Ball. Whilst some might see the beginnings of a teenage romance, for Adrian's parents a marriage proposal is the logical next step. Adrian's mum tells me about Esme: "She is a young girl. We'll train her. We won't beat her. In a few years' time she'll be a patient wife."”

{Lib-leftie multicults and ‘modernizing’ ‘Conservatives’ could be thanked for this liberation of Britain from its strange old ways – though how feminoids would respond to Steele’s film (due for showing on Channel 4, 3 ix) remained to be seen.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, August 25, 2014


 For the centenary of the outbreak of the Great War, which ended a century of passable harmony in Europe and began the bankrupting of Britain and its withdrawal from the White man’s burden in Africa, the Middle East, India, Singapore and Hong Kong, famed historian and journalist Sir Max Hastings (Charterhouse and University College Oxford, editor till his retirement of the London Daily Telegraph and Evening Standard) gave a fine defence, before an audience of 400 at Edinburgh’s Book Festival, of Britain getting involved (by declaring war on Germany).

Sir Max especially emphasized Austria’s determination to smash Serbia, the German Kaiser’s murderous autocracy (on display in massacres of civilians in south-west Africa and Belgium) and the unlikelihood that British neutrality would ever have been able to limit German hegemony.

    This was all very well as far as it went – even if Sir Max had no time to consider how French diplomats had inveigled Britain and its royals into anti-Germanism, nor how Britain’s promise to defend Belgium (when finally discovered in a dusty bottom drawer in the Foreign Office) actually had no legal force. But hopefully Sir Max would one day expand his interest in 1914 (with its colourfully uniformed cavalry charges led by officers in white gloves) to consider whether Britain should have used the period when Bismarck and Queen Victoria were around to encourage its German cousins to make peace with France and shift their civilizing mission to Russia, which could well have taken to German social democracy and German science and music, and anyhow abandoned its threat to British India.

As it was, the 20th century was one of endless division in Europe and the world being policed primarily by an America which, though war-rich, was infected with guilt about slavery and – for all its mighty aircraft carriers -- had no greater ambition than to be liked.


As he prepared for retirement from the House of Commons, my Oxford housemate of the 1960s, Nuffield College academic Austin Mitchell (q.v.), now 79, achieved the biggest publicity of his life by jesting that oldies like him were being displaced (thanks to Labour’s ‘All Women Shortlists’) by bright young fillies who, though they might help party bosses in the division lobbies by being agreeable and amenable, would not be so capable of dealing with big ideas (international affairs) or of the cut-and-thrust of parliamentary drinking ooops debate – surprisingly writing for the dreaded Daily Mail to express his good-humoured disaffection (Independent, 19 viii).

Europhobic Yorkshireman Mitchell, who had represented the EUSSR-ruined fishing port of Grimsby since 1977 and who had form for ‘politically incorrect’ asides, promptly drew left-gauleiter wrath: “Mitchell's views are a clear expression of sexism. He's a dinosaur member of the old boys’ club in the House.”

Another Indie correspondent wrote: “Many years ago we had high hopes for the charismatic Mitchell. But he turns out to be an insincere, hollow, spineless, anachronistic embarrassment to Labour.  His comments are not worth reporting, I'm sorry to say.”

Another volunteered analysis: “Poor old Austin has finally lost the plot. Perhaps he feels the way he does because of Linda, his pushy, bullying, overbearing tv producer wife...” – rather neglecting that Austin and Linda [McDougall] had been together for some 45 years even though Austin had had the escape route that Westminster provided.

{Such was the increasingly peecee-multiculti Labour outfit into which the wistfully comic ‘Tambourine Man’-devotee Austin had wandered, believing from his time in anti-EU New Zealand that the Europhobic cause would see him through to political greatness in Britain – or at least in Labour. The mistakes we (virtually) all make! – Likewise, through the 1970s, I thought genetic causes would win through in psychology and vindicate me as a ‘personality theorist.’ Or at least there was little g – just as Austin had his safe seat in Grimsby...}


 Its birds coming home to roost, the West found its great new dependent, the Ukraine, busy blasting the Edinburgh-sized cities of Luhansk and Donetz – with Russia needing to supply 270 lorries of humanitarian aid. From West-run Afghanistan, 35 Sikhs were so desperate to escape from Mueslis that they let people-smugglers lock them in a sealed shipping container heading to Tilbury docks (one died and all others required intensive hospital care).

In similarly expensively aided Eyeraq, where the West had also failed over a decade to make separate provision for different ethnic groups which hated each other, the military kit supplied by America was swiftly stolen (along with $1.6B in cash – from Mosul) by the beheading enthusiasts of SolunnISIS and used to close in on the key cities of Aleppo, Erbil and Baghdad.

In the US, ten days of anti-White rioting by Blacks and sympathizers and criminals could not be quelled even by the National Guard. And in Britain there was utter confusion as to what to do about the multicult-welcomed Muesli invasion, its takeover of schools (not to mention surgeries and council houses) in places like Bradford and Birmingham, its domination (indeed, terrorization) of many English prisons, its threats to shops selling Jewish produce, and its use of Britain as a convenient base from which to make leisurely excursions for jihadic training and warfighting in Syria and Iraq.

{Just how much more unrealism lay ahead was hard to say since no Western politicos dared make any speeches containing words like Bleck, gyp, Muesli etc. Above all, the word ‘empire’ and the need to restore it were unmentionable; so not even a costing of Chinese troops to do the humanitarian job and implement birth control was discussed or made. And more trouble lay ahead as Arabs and east-Africans arrived in Europe in a fast-increasing stream – with 120K annually reaching Italy alone.)


Just how a generation of politicos had betrayed the UK by allowing the growth of radical Islam was illustrated as an American freelance photojournalist, James Foley, was beheaded in Syria by a ‘British’ SolunnISIS executioner (Irish Mirror, 20 viii) – in response to US bombing having helped safeguard the giant dam on the Tigris, a breach in which would have yielded flooding that wiped away Mosul and parts of Baghdad.

The only consolation for Brits ashamed of one of their homegrown jihadists killing a captured American noncombatant citizen was that newsies described the murderer as having a ‘British’ accent: since there is no such thing (only English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish, Liverpuddlian, Cockney etc accents), the description was another of MSM’s countless peecee efforts to avoid mentioning the Arab/Pakistani/Black origins of such politico-welcomed criminals.

For Americans, the only consolation was that Foley was a nice young man who had been misguided by Western idealism into trying to bring down Syria’s Basher Assad – a self-chosen mission that had brought him into contact with jihadists and made him a sitting duck.

And he was not alone in such unrealism: commenting on whether the West should now reverse gear and co-operate with Syria, Iran and Russia against bloodthirsty Solunnis, the UK’s idiotic Foreign Secretary pronounced that (somehow) ‘this is not a case in which my enemy’s enemy is my friend.’ UK PM Daft Dave scurried back to No.10 (from his second holiday of the summer) to be ready to apologize to Pres. Barry whenever called upon to do so; but there would be no apology to British people for allowing murderous Mueslis to take root among them.


 As Israel continued to give quite as good as it got from Hamas in Gaza, George Galloway, MP for Muslim-dominated Bradford, declared the city “an Israel-free zone” (Daily Mail, 20 viii). Questioned by police under caution for race-hate crime, he protested such intrusion into his free speech. But he had gone well beyond mere claims about ‘the Israel problem’ and said: ‘We don’t want any Israeli goods. We don’t want any Israeli services. We don’t want any Israeli academics coming to the university or college. We don’t even want any Israeli tourists to come to Bradford even if any of them had thought of doing so.’


While Western leaders farted around ‘deploring’ as ‘depraved’ the SolunnISIS caliphate (which they had encouraged in their own enthusiasm to complete the idealistic overthrow of Madman Insane, Col. Gadawfu and Who’see MooBarack by ridding the Levant of London opthalmologist Basher Assad and his Vogue-cover wife), Mueslie calls to reconquer ‘al-Andalus’ became more frequent and more strident (Gatestone Institute, 17 vii).

    "Clearly Spain forms part of the strategic objectives of global jihad. We are not the only ones but we are in their sights," said Spanish Interior Minister, Jorge Fernández Díaz.

    Radical Muslims in Spain launched a social media campaign aimed at generating support for the jihadist group ‘Islamic State’ [IS]. The campaign involved posters that included images of famous Spanish landmarks and monuments emblazoned with Arabic slogans such as, "We are all the Islamic State" and "Long Live the Islamic State." One poster included an image of the mediaeval Islamic Aljafería Palace in the Spanish city of Saragossa and the black flag associated with IS. Another used an image of the famous La Concha beach in the Basque city of San Sebastián. Yet another included an image of the statue of Jesus Christ on Monte Urgull in San Sebastián, with the Arabic words "Al-Andalus Country" instead of "Basque Country."

    Moroccan authorities warned Spanish police that some of the more than 3,000 Moroccan jihadists fighting in Syria and Iraq were beginning to return home, and that many of them were likely to attempt to infiltrate the Spanish mainland via the North African Spanish exclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.

    {Would Spain resist? You bet! Hispanics were scheduled to take over the USA by 2050, so they would surely not be in the way of giving up their original homeland – whose first line of defence could be provided by Spain’s British partner from Gibraltar so long as Spain’s post-Franco socialists did not just follow EUSSR diktats and allow the invasion.}


 Gifted propagandist for atheism, Richard Dawkins (now retired from his Oxford chair), may always have been diplomatically cagey about the biology of race, but from time to time he mentioned his hereditarianism about IQ, most lately writing on Twitter that parents-to-be who learn their foetus is headed for Down’s Syndrome have an ethical responsibility to “abort it and try again,” eliciting online fury (Daily Telegraph, 21 viii).


Theorists like Jared Diamond who liked to think Native Americans [Red Indians] were beaten by White diseases rather than by White intelligence and weaponry took a knock as Arizona professor Anne Stone found TB strains in Peruvian bones of c.700A.D., 800 years before Europeans arrived in the New World. Apparently TB and other ailments could easily have been spread from Africa by seals and sea lions (Daily Telegraph, 21 viii).


The president of the world's most populous Muslim-majority country, Indonesia, called the actions of ‘Islamic State’ militants "embarrassing" to the religion and urged Islamic leaders to unite in tackling extremism. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said the scale of the slaughter wrought by the extremists in overrunning large swathes of Iraq and Syria and the level of violence being used was appalling. "It is shocking. It is becoming out of control," he said in an interview with The Australian, a day after IS released a video showing a masked militant beheading US reporter James Foley, provoking worldwide revulsion.

"We do not tolerate it, we forbid ISIS in Indonesia," he added, referring to ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), as IS was formerly known (Daily Telegraph, 21 viii).

{In Britain, UKIP leader Nigel Garage called for the passports of ‘Britons’ pursuing jihad in Syria to be withdrawn – in which he had the support of a Telegraph editorial; but no other leader – Muesli or otherwise – had anything to propose in response to the first attack by SolunnISIS on an American. Ordinary Westerners had long been cowed by PeeCee into keeping mum about any anti-Islamofascist action that might occur to them.}


As Britain’s SAS struggled to beat the FBI in identifying the ‘British’ beheader of American James Foley (so as to spend millions of pounds having thirty crack soldiers retrieve him from Syria, imprisoning him for a few months until taxpayer-funded lawyers established countless compensatable violations of his ‘uman rights, issuing him back-dated welfare benefits and a council mansion for his wives and bastard children, and giving him a permanent police guard to shield him forever from irate Brits) it transpired that the mammoth incompetence of the country’s peecee-crazed politicos had allowed some 600 grinning, selfie-making, twittering Muesli goons to cross the Channel to murder whomever they chose in Syria and Iraq.

According to MoD, only 0.4% of Britain’s military personnel were Muslim – though Mueslis made up 4.3% of Britain’s population and British Mueslis made up 30% of SolunnISIS (D.Mail, 22 viii). For reasons unadmitted by Britain’s useless ‘authorities,’ Portsmouth, Cardiff and Manchester had proved specially common recruiting grounds for the ‘jihadists.’ Just how Muesli parents could invariably profess innocence of their boys’ murderous proclivities was a mystery; but HMG’s granting of citizenship and passports to such swine was a monumental disgrace – especially when paid for in American blood.


I discovered to my satisfaction that I had been granted membership of an ‘elite cadre of racist, anti-immigrationist, superiorist’ scientists and journalists – including David Buss (U.Texas), Steven Pinker (Harvard U.), Charles Murray (American Enterprise Institute), Glayde Whitney (Florida State U.; d.), Phil Rushton (U.Ontario; d.) and Steve Sailer (Human Biodiversity Group; VDare).  See: here


 After a year of suspension for a Dorset independent school math teacher and a four-day jury trial, boyish Russell Woolwright, 30, was cleared in just 90 minutes of charges that he had forced a flirtatious 17-yr pupilette (who emailed him that she invited him to “party in my pants”) to fellate him in an alleyway (D.Mail, 22 viii). Woolwright’s only mistake had been to meet the star-struck teen privately to disabuse her of any idea that he seriously reciprocated her lust. He said: ‘This trial has not only affected me but also my friends and family. It has made me realise the power is with the pupils and not with the teachers. An allegation can be made at any time.’ Mr Woolwright also revealed that he would like to get back into teaching again, but said he would be ‘more wary’ of situations involving students in the future. Needless to say, the 17-yr-old remained un-named “for legal reasons.”{The full expense of this latest case of vexatious feminoid-inspired litigation remained to be calculated.}


 As commentators turned to analysing the causes of the Ferguson riots in Missouri, Brett Stevens identified the heart of matter (AmRen, 19 viii):

"We think we should get [the racial harmony] we pay for. We pay taxes. We pay in guilt and mea culpas. We pay every time we watch Hollywood propaganda. We pay whenever an affirmative-action incompetent bungles his job. But despite 150 years of subsidies, bloodshed, violence, and occasional burnt cities, the problem will not go away.

    Commentators offer different reasons why Ferguson is burning. They blame racial injustice or militarized police or the police officer who shot an unarmed teenager. Some even blame Michael Brown [the 300lb Black thief shot six times by White cops]. But all these explanations miss the truth: Ferguson is symptom, not cause, and the cause is diversity. Diversity–”uniting” different ethnic groups in a country under capitalist liberal democracy–doesn’t work.

    .... Of course, [Americans] are not alone in suffering under diversity. The Yezidis in northern Iraq face genocide in a region that has been fractured by diversity for centuries. In China, the Uighurs rage against the majority Han. Even Ireland still fights battles between the ethnically distinct Northern Irish and the rest of the population. Race war and genocide are the norm; wherever it has been tried, diversity does not work."


A singularly fine exposition of Britain’S predicament re the EUSSR was provided by London’s Libertarian Alliance leader Sean Gabb (here) – especially making the point that peecee despotism emanates rather more from London and Washington than from Brussels and Berlin.

The panoply of EU regulation, argued SG, provided only a convenient fig leaf behind which authoritarians of all stripes could, as and when desired, pursue their statist ambitions – which might well become yet more rampant if a UK referendum ‘freed’ the country from what post-1945 politicians had built up (helping keep the Anglo-American/Russian-imposed peace for seventy years and attracting all but never-conquered traditionalist Switzerland to sign up).

The only thing that SG omitted was that PeeCee – whatever its origins or current headquartering – had become a worldwide religion, with even Mr Putin and Chink Premier Ping Pong Dung [whose very address was unknown] quite unable to articulate the truth about race and IQ. For, yes, PeeCee was the modern realization – or, at least, bureaucratization – of egalitarianism, and needed worldwide opposition from lovers of liberty and realistic fraternity, as per ‘Personality, Biology and Society’, sections XXVII and XXVIII.

(A sample: "....I suppose that the claim in [America's] Declaration of Independence that "all men are created equal" is the most extreme single untruth ever uttered in the entire history of human communication." Bernard LEVIN, 1988, The Times, 8 ix.)

SG’s genius was to continue appreciation of the violent contradiction between the different ‘ideals’ of the French Revolution – the failure to resolve which had led to France’s 2014 disaster, with its polygamous President maximally unpopular, its ‘citizens’ migrating to London and its own capital full of disaffected car-burning Mueslis who knew ‘equality’ was a sham.


 As Britain’s useless and treacherous multifarting politicians reflected from their beach huts on what to do about mad Mueslidom and Mesopotamia [the lands around the Euphrates and possibly Tigris rivers], their illiberal anti-Western minds (not least that of face-lifted Home Secretary Topwitch Mama Theresa May) naturally turned to banning more free speech and freedom of association to the entire UK population as a way of appearing tough while apparently fair in the swatting of the young jihadists whom they had so woefully nurtured. But was there another way?

    Following the principle of racial/ethnic realism, it was actually a pretty good idea for Britain to rid itself of goons who might serve the useful function of creating a Solunni ‘IS’ state in Mesopotamia that would cater for Solunnis who did not want to live under the monarchy of Saudi Arabia or the democracy of Turkey. The only problem would be how to share Baghdad between Solunnis and Shitites – but the sharing of Jerusalem between Jews, Muslims and Christians showed a way forward.

As to the Kurds, they would get the lands east of the Tigris, and a five-year guarantee from Nato of immunity from attack. Other groups were already protected: the Shitites of Iraq by Iran; Turkey (a conduit for goons to IS) by Nato; Syria by Russia; Lebanon by France; Jordan by Prince Charles and the international fashion industry [Queen Rania]; Israel by America; and Saudi by its vast America-supplied armamentarium.

    Yet what of resident Mueslis in Britain who professed to hate the West and proposed to use the UK as a base for whatever merry 72-virgin-seeking jihadic sallies that might occur to them? Apparently it would be contrary to their ‘uman rights to make them stateless and deport them to Papua New Guinea, Siberia or even the Outer Hebrides. A modest ban on incitement, encouragement or enablement (by British citizens or UK residents) of killing or maiming any other than those whom HMG had declared its enemies looked a possibility – and could be welcomed by true liberals if it were accompanied by repeal of all ‘race hate speech’ legislation of the previous fifty years and by true conservatives if it were accompanied by HMG closing one mosque for each Muesli outrage.


Not content with harassing, helicopter-monitoring, arresting, smearing, trying, jailing, ruining and driving to suicide (as more ‘abusees’ came forward in hope of cash) such petty alleged child abusers as top popstar Sir Cliff Richard (beloved in Portugal – D.Telegraph, 23 viii), the paedohysteria industry turned to locking up the very children it felt driven by tabloid feminazism to protect. It turned out that almost half of the young people in the English prison system's secure (i.e. gated and locked) ‘children's homes’ had not been convicted of any crime, but had been placed there by peecee local authorities ‘for their own protection’ (or at least for the protection of authorities), the Observer established (24 viii).

Some experts said local authorities faced a difficult dilemma and that incarceration was the "least bad" option. An absence of alternative accommodation and the fact that some ‘vulnerable’ children keep running away to fleece men meant a place in a secure children's home was better than leaving them vulnerable to predatory gangs of sex-starved Paks (who could not themselves be pursued for fear of charges of ‘racism’). Some correspondents of the leftist Observer called for the girls’ parents to be jailed as well....


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, August 18, 2014


 Hilariously, the leftist NYT’s longstanding science editor, Nicholas Wade (q.v.), who had, as he retired, revealed moderately biologistic/hereditarian proclivities about race (though never touching on Black IQ), found himself jumped on by 150 ‘geneticists’ who wrote to his old newspaper to insist that races were ‘like the colours of the rainbow, shading into each other’ – which was exactly what Wade himself (like the still longer-running London School) had said (Independent, 13 viii).

The protest by left-indoctrinated goons against their own former journalistic frontman – an Etonian and King’s College Cambridge graduate in natural science (1964) -- was led by a Mark Stoneking (LU. Leipzig) and Jerry Coyne (LU. Chicago) and was distinguished not only by its banality but by the failure of the letter and subsequent correspondence ever to mention such key race-realistic psychologists as Hans Eysenck, Phil Rushton and Richard Lynn. A sample:

“Wade juxtaposes an incomplete and inaccurate account of our research on human genetic differences with speculation that recent natural selection has led to worldwide differences in IQ test results, political institutions and economic development,” the letter says.

    “We reject Wade’s implication that our findings substantiate his guesswork. They do not. We are in full agreement that there is no support from the field of population genetics for Wade’s conjectures,” it says.

    In his book, Mr Wade attacks the “longstanding orthodoxy” among social scientists that human races are a social construct with little or no basis in biology and genetics, along with the idea that human evolution effectively stopped long ago in the distant past.

‘Not-a-geneticist’ Wade, meanwhile, issued a statement saying that the protest letter was driven by politics rather than science and that most of the signatories had not read his book but were responding to “a slanted summary devised by the organisers.”“As no reader of the letter could possibly guess, A Troublesome Inheritance argues that opposition to racism should be based on principle, not on anti-evolutionary myth that there is no biological basis to race,” Wade said.

Amusingly, the publication of Wade’s defence of race realism coincided with Sweden announcing it would eliminate all mention of ‘race’ from its laws and statutes (ViceNEWS, 11 viii) – showing that it was not just the English-speaking world that had gone completely potty about the horrors of ‘racism.’

Science Mag, 8 viii, carried discussion and a plea by Wade that critics should try reading his book (which disclaims racism every few pages in an effort to propitiate leftists).


 As a million wretched ‘Yazidis’ and Christians fled starving, barefoot and baking up a godforsaken mountain to escape the Saudi-funded Solunnis of ‘Isis’ in northern Eyeraq, pious peecee Westies at last got a glimpse of what their politicos and their own loopy White guilt, ex-Christianity, egalitarianism, socialism, ‘anti-racism,’ human-rights-captivated multiculti idealism and failure to insist on birth control had let them in for (Indie, 13 viii, Patrick Cockburn):

"A striking development in the Islamic world in recent decades is the way in which Wahhabism is taking over mainstream Sunni Islam. In one country after another Saudi Arabia is putting up the money for the training of preachers and the building of mosques. A result of this is the spread of sectarian strife between Sunni and Shia. The latter find themselves targeted with unprecedented viciousness from Tunisia to Indonesia. Such sectarianism is not confined to country villages outside Aleppo or in the Punjab, it is poisoning relations between the two sects in every Islamic grouping. A Muslim friend in London told me: "Go through the address books of any Sunni or Shia in Britain and you will find very few names belonging to people outside their own community."

    "The resurgence of al-Qa'ida-type groups is not a threat confined to Syria, Iraq, and their near neighbours. What is happening in these countries, combined with the increasing dominance of intolerant and exclusive Wahhabite beliefs within the worldwide Sunni community, means that all 1.6 billion Muslims, almost a quarter of the world's people, will be increasingly affected. Furthermore, it seems unlikely that non-Muslim populations, including many in the West, will be untouched by the conflict. Today's resurgent jihadism, which has shifted the political terrain in Iraq and Syria, is already having far-reaching effects on global politics with dire consequences for us all."

This is an extract from 'The Jihadis Return: Isis and the New Sunni Uprising', by Patrick Cockburn, published by OR Books, available exclusively at

In London, ISIS supporters of their leader BadDaddy handed out flyers to Oxford Street shoppers encouraging them to leave Britain for its new Islamic State. The ‘radicals’ stood in front of posters declaring 'the dawn of a new era has begun' in reference to the Syria/Iraq caliphate and their literature praised the 'sacrifices' made by mad Solunni Mueslis in the Middle East (D.Mail, 13 viii).


 Holy socialist France took a step nearer to censoring thought itself as an Angers court fined Cholet’s deputy-mayor, Gilles Bourdouleix MP, 3K euros for muttering, while inspecting an illegal gypsy encampment, that Adolf Hitler “maybe did not kill enough” Roma. At the time, the deputy-mayor was being given Nazi salutes; and his remark was not heard by Roma and was indeed only just audible on the tape recording made by an accompanying journalist. On hearing that the journalist was reporting the musing to the gendarmerie, Bourdouleix called the newsie “a little sh*t” – for which the court added a further fine of 600 euros (Guardian, 12 viii). Why the gypsies were not charged with ‘behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace’ was unknown....

    In east London, ‘travellers’ evicted from a Dagenham nature reserve dumped 60 tonnes of rubbish (including fridge-freezers, gas cylinders, sofas and an exercise bike), leaving the bird sanctuary looking like a war zone and eliciting disgust from the local UKIP parliamentary candidate (D.Mail, 13 viii).

In Herefordshire, a 71-yr retired company director killed both himself and his invalid wife with his shotgun after his being beaten in a battle with his local council to keep gypsies away from his idyllic £.5M cottage – which was expected to lose a fifth of its value when the gypsy influx began (D.Telegraph, 14 viii).

By 2014, gypsies and Irish travellers constituted 5% of England’s prison numbers – i.e. they were 50-fold over-represented in comparison with their population numbers in the 2011 Census (D.Telegraph, 11 iii 14, David Barrett).


 Already having abandoned its key idea of freedom (from Catholicism, the French, cops, drugged-up defective criminals, all-purpose peecee censoriousness etc) and converted itself into a gambling outfit (with its massive ‘finance’ sector supported at the international casino by states that took around 50% of their viable citizens’ earnings in enforced taxation – soon to be accompanied in Britain by lightning government raids on bank accounts), the West declared its post-Cold-War nonsense for all to see by having its politicians on holiday while – having failed to get its feminists and kaffirs to clobber Islam and failed to achieve anything by media support for the supposed ‘Arab Spring’ – it gave quarter-hearted military ooops humanitarian backing to the Kurds, the great enemy of its own Nato ally Turkey, while declining to back Basher Assad, the Syrian leader who had long himself been battling the Kurds’ jihadist enemies (variously al-Queerdo, al-Nootcake, ISIL, ISIS, IS etc).

At the same time, the West’s politicos and MSM went gaga to back Hamassassin in Gaza against its own main ally, Judah ooops Israel. They called it the ‘silly season’.... By contrast, Russia had consistently and persistently defended itself against Muesli fruitcakes and Western losers and maintained support for the Shitites of Syria and oil-rich Iran – even supplying the Indo-European Kurds (who could themselves become the world’s sixth-largest oil producer) with weapons long before the West thought of the idea.

The West’s failure to identify and stand by natural racial allies had been a ghastly mistake – though innocently begun by wanting Solunni Turkey as an ally against Communist Russia and wanting Saudi (frozen in the worst Solunni anti-feminism, and with its maniacal Weeabits funding al-Queerdo) to deliver oil.


 Unknown to me (or at least unremembered by me), a full and fair summary of The g Factor (Wiley DePublisher, 1996) and its British reception had been provided in American Renaissance, vii 1996 (see ‘Whys and Wherefores of Intelligence’ and ‘Adventures in the Book Trade’); and a sturdy correlation of -.53 had been reported between g and inspection time in no less than 326 Taiwanese high school students (So & Orme-Johnson) Intelligence, 2001).

As to the C21 competition (from my one-time Oxford tutor who wisely relegated ratmanship and cognitivism so as to keep up with the science of IQ), see my 2006 review of IQ and Human Intelligence (2011, 2nd ed.) at Amazon Books. (Cambridge-elevated [at leftist King’s College] Nicholas Mackintosh’s acceptance of the interest of IQ was sadly unmatched by religiously-revered philosopher and foxhunter Roger Scruton, who turned up at the 2014 Edinburgh International Book Festival deploring the limitations of science and mouthing the merits of ‘the sacred,’ ‘the soul’ and spirituality – about which his 30-year voyage of verbiage had manifestly taught him nothing [not even how to deal with questions about whether he actually prayed – a practice shown inefficacious by Galton in 1872].)


 Confuting the usual ill-confirmed assumption that ‘victims’ of paedophilia succumb only as lambs to the slaughter, a 17-yr-old girl came forward to tell Grimsby Crown Court she had been in love with the 28-yr-older married father of two, Jeff Havercroft, when she agreed to an affair with him in 2011. “It takes two to tango,” she observed, adding “He could not have got away from me if he had tried.” The judge believed her and said he would reduce Havercroft’s sentence to two years (D.Telegraph, 15 viii).

    However, there was no fear of the police, courts and tabloids running out of paedophiles to persecute as a 48-yr female stepped forward to complain of repeated abuse when she was around age five by her late father (a QC) and his friend Sir Nicholas Fairbairn (Solicitor General for Scotland under Mrs Thatcher) – the decease of the two august gents evidently being no bar to cops mounting extensive enquiries, despite the woman’s sister dismissing the allegations as fanciful (D.Telegraph, 15 viii).

    A striking protest against the besmirching of popsuperstar Sir Cliff Richard’s name as twenty unannounced non-uniformed police spent five hours turning his Berkshire penthouse upside down in a fishing expedition for evidence of him having molested a 15-yr-old boy in the 1980s – the search having been leaked to the BBC (which used a helicopter to monitor the high-performance unmarked police cars used in the bust) so the publicity might lead other gold-diggers ooops victims to come forward with ancient charges that could never have been pursued (thanks to statutes of limitation) in most European countries (Independent, 16 viii, Geoffrey Robertson QC).


 It turned out that my 2011 review of Richard Lynn’s The Chosen People had been reproduced approvingly as a “valuable introduction” to the “highly important” work of “probably Britain’s foremost academic [psychologist]” by The British Resistance Movement – which apparently took the same view as myself, that Ashkenazi Jews had fomented multiculturalism and Muesli migration to Europe as their (understandable but absurdly dangerous) ploy to take antiSemitic heat off themselves (14 viii). (Lynn’s book – unread by contender for London School leadership Nicholas Wade (2014, q.v.) – had solved the problem of mediocre Israeli IQ by distinguishing Ashkenazi from Sephardic, Oriental [‘Mizrahim’] and Ethiopian Jews.)


America was given a graphic visual aid to what its future held as, after a week of televised mayhem, hundreds of Blecks actually defied a five-hour night-time curfew declared in Ferguson, a 70% Black suburb of St Louis (Classic FM, 17 viii, 08:30). Rioting – with countless attempts to injure police – was a response to a young Black thief, Michael Brown having been shot dead after he had resisted arrest, arguably tried to kill an officer with the cop’s own gun and tried to flee.

The multi-million-dollar effort by the Bleck community came after fifty years of politically correct Whites bowing the knee to Blecks at every turn. Not a single Black was shot for curfew violation since Americans still hoped for a quiet life of unofficial apartheid, with White flight getting them away from the worst horrors, just leaving a few White police to provide a semblance of control of the ever-ongoing problems of Black retardation, illiteracy, unemployability, welfare dependency and father-absent families.

In Ferguson, however, authority had manifestly broken down, with even an easy and reasonable curfew being flagrantly disobeyed. President Barry Hussein Obarmy, who had been elected to placate Blecks, stayed away on a golfing holiday.

    Obarmy was not alone in his inclination. Other Western leaders too holidayed, or at least kept their heads in the sand about ISIS savagery, while farting that a few US drones and airdrops of Vichy water would do the trick for embattled Kurds. Despite pictures of six-year-old Arab Solunni Mueslis holding aloft severed Christian heads, the West showed no recognition of its plans for multiculturalism in the Middle East being mistaken, let alone of the need to talk with Russia and China about how to deal with the vile forces which the West had unleashed.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.