Monday, July 21, 2014


  As sure as night follows day, the costs of Britain’s idiotic peecee-multiculturalism began to appear on the balance sheet. And there was only one word for them: tyranny of which the most far-out right-winger could be well and truly proud. The press was to be government-censored for the first time since 1688 – so as to protect the ‘privacy’ of sex perverts Hugh Grant and Max Mosley and expense-fiddling MPs.

Any Brit could be imprisoned untried for years in any Euroland country where an unevidenced accusation of ‘race hate speech’ or homophobia had been handed to gendarmes – such flagrant violation of Magna Carta being deemed necessary to protect the ‘rights’ of precious minorities. A bakery in Ulster could (according to legal eagles) be obliged to provide wedding cakes bearing the message ‘Support gay marriage’ – so presumably any Brit could be made to publish opinions that were contrary to his own.

100% state surveillance of personal emails was rushed through Parliament (probably in response to American demands for tighter security). And air travellers who already suffered 1-hour indignities of non-profiled strip searching by unsmiling officials (who would stop them travelling at all if they made jokes) had their agonies increased by demands that all their electronic gear be demonstrated as bomb-free and by the admission that airport staff thoroughly enjoyed themselves gawping at the nipple- and penis-sizes revealed in the searches that had to occur because Britain had admitted so many Blecks and Peks and allowed them to import illiterate wives and breed on the NHS.

{Naturally, Britain’s political class covered its peecee progress to tyranny by a gradual increase in placatory statements that immigration should be monitored and discussed and accusations of ‘racism’ limited – statements that were pure fart gas and yielded no action whatsoever to restore freedoms for which centuries of Brits had fought.}


 As Germany proved its mastery of British ways by a 1-0 win over the Argies to take the World Cup [for soccer], completing a Nordic triumph over footie-mad mulattoes on South American soil, it found its team’s ‘intelligence’ applauded several times in even the Guardian (14 vii, 14 vii) – which praised “intelligent forward thinking” and (twice) “intelligent design” though a majority of that paper’s readers surely professed to abhor the g factor. The Argies too were commended for great “tactical intelligence.” The Guardian even wrote of Germany’s “superbly engineered über-Europeanism” and “intelligently geared sporting system”; and of the team manager’s “highfalutin chat, the attitude, if not before now the medals of a genius.” Especially amusingly, exemplifying the unimportance of practice and experience, the winning German goal was scored brilliantly from a lightning extra-time volley by the youngest player on the field, Mario Götze, 22 (whose father was a professor – of technology, in Dortmund). Within twelve hours, the manager of mulatto Brazil – relegated into 4th place despite its 221M population – resigned.


 Following general comments (in ‘IQ & PC,’ some complaining) about top scientific journalist Nick Wade’s new effort to chart a genetically informed path between environmentocrazed anthropologists and eugenicist hereditarians, an extended listing of Wade’s beliefs looked as if it could be helpful – beginning with those more acceptable to the London School, as follows.

Biological factors are important. {Though, strangely, the main final overthrower of behaviourism, Noam Chomsky (who in 1967 demonstrated the innateness of grammatical language), does not get a mention in Wade’s book.}

Human races {of historically non-interbreeding families} do exist –- contrary to the ‘wisdom’ of 20th-century social science. The efforts of the Jews Franz Boas and Ashley Montagu are understandable {as a reaction to European persecution –- notably in Russia} but scientifically wrong. Even ‘geneticists’ like genome-wallah Craig Venter {and Robert Plomin, not to mention Wade himself till his retirement from NYT} “obfuscate” racial differences out of concern for their livelihoods.

Races overlap and shade into each other and sometimes interbreed. Some human races may soon become separate species despite modern travel and miscegenation of celebrities {for few want Blacks as partners}. The principal genetic differences between races are in allele frequencies. Race is strongly correlated with language.

There are three main races: Indo-European, East Asian and African {as the unmentionable Phil Rushton expounded}. Native Americans {like Australian aborigines} did not evolve much because their territories were empty and easy; Papuans because there weren’t enough of them {and, like South African Bushmen, they had chanced on special formulae for success –- Greek-style educative paedophilia for the former and water divining for the latter}.

Human personality has a definite biological basis, though co-evolving with human choices and creation of social environment. Personality differences can be traced occasionally to underlying differences in levels of such chemical agents as oxytocin and monamine oxidase, conveying respectively {such Big Six traits as} trust/friendliness {little a} and pacificity/depression {little –e}.

Racial differences are “copious and recent” but of limited significance. For example, E.Asians have an IQ of 105. The last sizeable difference to evolve was 15K years ago, when Tibetans became capable of living at high altitude. But markers of race are definite –- allowing 80%-correct assignment of race on just the basis of a few skull fragments (as Boas himself admitted).

Human differences in intelligence are substantially, though by no means wholly genetic in origin. {Attempts to quantify heritability [h²] are best ignored as incomprehensible to students, journalists and probably genomic experts....}

IQ differences are polygenic {as maintained by the unmentionable Hans Eysenck from c.1965}, so the failure of geneticists c.2000 to find any main gene for intelligence is no surprise.

Even if powerful genes for intelligence were discovered, there would be no need for racist thought since genetic influences could easily be “overwhelmed” by social factors {the demonstrated failure of all C.20 improving schemes like Head Start notwithstanding}. German IQ scoring increased from the 1960s to the 1990s {a ‘finding’ attributed to unpublished work by one Ron Unz}.

The world’s sudden progress to modernity – led by England, beginning c. 1780 – has some biological explanation. {Wade discusses this at length but is neither decisive or convincing  about what the explanation is. He thinks a ‘sudden population growth spurt’ led to brighter people having more children but cannot furnish detail, any more than an account of why a similar process never occurred in China. He might have been better acknowledging Weber (barely mentioned) and the Protestant work ethic; and recognizing that, post-1688, the Church of England allowed its priests (the only high-IQ and educated people in most areas) to be both prosperous and highly fertile.}

Cultural differences are chiefly in ‘institutions’, albeit deriving from the ‘slight’ basic biological/psychological differences between races. {The rice-growing-driven conformity of the Chinese can be ignored, apparently; as can the wide IQ spread in only semi-subjugated India which made the caste system the subcontinent’s natural main form of government. Again, Wade is neglectful of Islamic egalitarianism – which he rightly identifies as the cause of Muslims having to make slaves of everyone else – being due to polygamy (under which each woman fights for the rights of her own child); and of Western individualism and accepted hierarchy owing to monogamy and the recognition [in primogeniture] that a woman will normally invest [for reasons that Freud spotted, calling the phenomenon penis envy] more in her eldest boy.}

People are becoming less aggressive, more gracialized [with smaller jaws, lower murder rates etc]. {Here, Wade follows his rival in 50% progress to realism, the Jewish psycholinguist, Steven Pinker. But, in this matter, both ignore ‘institutions’ – for the peace of Europe since 1945 has been kept chiefly by states’ possession of nukes, imposing a merciful ‘cold war’ that will only be ended by Muslim intransigence and willingness to actually deploy such Pakistan-based weaponry against the Jews. Anyhow, physical ‘gracialization’ has apparently been most marked in Africa....}

East Asian prosperity is a myth {notwithstanding its enormous increase since the brutal wars and civil wars of the first half of C20 and E.Asians now taking up 10% of university places in the West}.

Racism is repellent and anyhow not available to scientists who deal only in facts {notwithstanding that psychology shows humans unequal in the most important and valued quality of intelligence....}.

The Wade-admitted sorry state of Africans and Arabs {not to mention Australian aborigines and Kalahari bushmen} can be ignored by biologists as having as yet ‘no proven scientific basis’ {even as the more entrepreneurial third-worlders stream into Europe at the rate of thousands per day so as to get away from the duller, poorer and more hideously and insistently cruel, superstitious, misogynistic and lower-IQ of their countrymen}.

Scientists deal only in proven facts {notwithstanding that 99% of science –- and 100% of environmentalistic theorizing} is probabilistic in nature....} so racism is wrong, wrong and wrong again. {Further protestation by Wade of his anti-racism (despite believing in races) appeared in Huffington Post, 30 v.}

Altogether, Wade’s was an impressive and scholarly effort – only lacking an application form for membership (and a quick ascent to leadership) of the London School and an appreciation of the big psychological variations in g (which provides the backbone of social hierarchy) and n (which assigns the more anxious group members to border surveillance and control). The trick of dismissing unwanted facts as ‘not proven’ was, of course, cleverly imitative of Boas himself; but Wade’s failure even to attempt to quantify his own favoured findings would fool only some of the people for some of the time. Few would long forget that the greatest (and richest) hereditarian psychometrician-psychologist, Raymond Cattell (1905-98), the master of factor analysis and personality measurement, earned no mention in Wade’s book despite Cattell having been committed to sociobiological, racial and eugenic thought and quantification as early as the 1930s.

For a round-up of reviews of A Troublesome Inheritance, see {I am indebted to a Luxemburger correspondent for this info.}


It transpired, as the Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence (Oliver Wilhelm & Randall W. Engle) got online publication, that publisher Sage had allowed a chapter (by Werner W. Wittmann) discussing the dreaded ‘group differences’ in psychology. An extract:

"Group differences in intelligence and related measures. Group differences in abilities, aptitudes, knowledge, and intelligence; their amount, origins in nature/nurture, impacts, and consequences in real life and what to do with them for job selection; and admissions to higher education are a “political minefield” (Halpern, cited in Kersting, 2003). Group differences is a most controversial topic in psychology and social sciences, in which a researcher can easily fall into booby traps, ruin or endanger his or her academic career, or at least get a finger burnt. A literature or an internet search related to names such as Sir Cyril Burt, Arthur Jensen, Philip Rushton, Chris Brand, William Shockley, Raymond Cattell, Richard Herrnstein, Charles Murray, and Hans Eysenck will hint at a comprehensive selection of controversies related to the topic of individual and group differences in intelligence."

Likewise, it was nice that The g Factor got star billing at ‘Psychometrics Links’:


 Feminoids, who had done precisely nothing over thirty years to resist the Islamic invasion of Britain (with its practices of FGM, enforced cousin marriage and female enslavement) found their pathetic ‘movement’ given some beef by ‘Britain First,’ a group of patriots who had, at least in their own minds, replaced the ‘collapsing’ British National Party and English Defence League. Identifying female equality as a core British value (OK: Boadicea, Katherine of Aragon [scourge of the Scots], Q.Liz I, Jane Austen, Q.Victoria, ‘George’ Eliot, Elizabeth Taylor, Mrs  Thatcher, Q.Liz II – though married women could not own property till 1870), uniformed heavies of BF gave the worthies of Crayford mosque, in Kent, a hard time – demanding in particular that the mosque strip out its sexually segregrating entrances within a week (Huffington Post, 15 vii). {A clever move, to muscle in on a moribund movement which had no cause since Brit women got the vote in 1926 and The Pill in 1960 and which was devoting itself C21 to voting socialist and putting more fat, ugly and disabled old bags on TV! Whether top feminoids would come round to agreeing with BF or have their hubbies’ cash to support it remained to be seen.}


 Having achieved nothing in his four Downing Street years apart from placating yag blackmailers and keeping bankrupt Britain borrowing, ‘Tory’ leader PM Daft Dave Shamoron sacked the remaining interesting members of his Cabinet (teacher-bashing Michael Gove and cigar-puffing Europhile Kenneth Clarke). Reckoning the Clottish referendum was in the bag thanks to women preferring UK security, DD aimed to win the 2015 General Election with a parade of agreeable smiling just-about-under-50 females who would present the desired PR image that everything was OK. The beaming Blairism of DD’s hero was thus to have its last outing before realism took over – turning the ‘welfare state’ into a proper insurance scheme, backing a Nordic League, and accepting that only Russia was likely to defend Europe from the Muesli take-over to which its unrealistic traitors to civilization had exposed it.


  Unchecked by Britain’s useless politicians, tabloid paedohysteria inspired Britain’s equally spineless police to arrest 660 ‘paedophiles’ (including teachers, choirmen, sports coaches, scoutmasters, lawyers, doctors, policemen, careworkers etc) following six months of inquiries (Classic FM, 16 vii, 12:00) – accusing them mainly of harmless downloading of ‘disgusting’ images (one young doctor had a million), and no doubt costing taxpayers at least £10K per arrest (not to mention the £100K per trial and £.5M per imprisonment) by cops who would rather operate from computer screens in cosy offices than pound the streets seeing the mess that hopelessly unrealistic egalitarian politicos had created (the latest arrivals being the fifty gypsies begging, thieving, fighting, boozing and defecating in London’s once-bijou Park Lane). A total of 9,172 computers and mobile phones were seized by the previously-unheard-of ‘National Crime Agency’ during the investigation, with 833 premises searched across the UK.


After years of importing 7M Mueslis, France had to endure the embarrassment of open fighting between Jewish and pro-Palestinian youth on Paris streets (D.Mail, 16 vii). After six Mueslis were arrested for trying to break into two synagogues, 150 supporters of the Jewish Defence League rampaged around the Place de la Bastille armed with broken furniture and pepper sprays, wearing crash helmets and chanting “F*** Palestine” as they pursued their quarry. Evidently the multiculti message of besotted French socialists, fondly believing in the secularism of the 144th Republic, had not been absorbed in all quarters.

    Meanwhile, in the mad Middle East, where Mueslis supplied guns, rockets and drones to Palestinians (on condition that their origins remain unprovable to Westerners, which could have led to suspension of American aid), the latest outbreak of Gaza vs Israel bombing bubbled along nicely, though likely to be superseded by Solunni vs Shitite hostilities dating back 1.5K years in the history of ‘the religion of peace.’


As the Western-contrived multiculti Iraq fell apart, even the Guardian – which had gone along with overthrowing relatively peace-keeping dictator Madman Insane and installing demakrazy – could be found admiring the ethnic autonomy which Kurds of the north-east had been able to seize from the horror story (17 vii):

One part of Iraq, however, has largely escaped the mayhem engulfing the rest of the country. It is Kurdistan, the autonomous Kurdish region of northern Iraq. Its capital, Irbil, is a haven of religious tolerance and relative safety. The suburb of Ainkawa, for example, is home to a large Christian community: nuns and a Chaldean church. There's also a pleasant beer garden where crowds gathered over the weekend to drink Efes and to watch the World Cup final on a giant screen.

    "Beneath Irbil's ancient citadel are cafes where those who are not fasting during Ramadan can eat lunch – shielded by a tactful white cloth. The city is predominantly Kurdish, but also home to Arabs who escaped from Baghdad as security deteriorated, and a recent wave of refugees who fled Mosul as Isis arrived. If there is a success story in Iraq, it's here."


 Despite the West having failed to pacify the Middle East, Mueslie-threatened north Africa and the China Sea, having suffered what some thought the worst financial crash since 1930, and having ditched most of its civil liberties in its guilty rush to suppress racism, sexism, homophobism, disablism and paedophilia, immigrants of dubious IQ and literacy continued to stream in – illustrated crossing the Med (above, 9 iv) and Mexico (immediately below, showing the decrepit freight train called ‘The Beast’ which brought 1.5K escapees from barbarism daily to the ‘border’ with the socialistified Useless States of America, at the cost of brutally enforced payments to Mexico’s criminal gangs – D.Mail, 18 vii).

{The traitorous ‘politicians’ of the West welcomed the third-world invasion since it maintained the fluidity which allowed their own criminal gangs [called ‘banks’ and ‘businesses’ – taxed [or rather, untaxed] offshore, changing their names annually and making multi-multi-millionaires of their supposed controllers] to flourish. No speeches involving political philosophy were any longer needed since PeeCee was enforced [with the gusto of the Spanish Inquisition] as an incontrovertible framework of unrealistic and illiberal ideas [for no criticism or even mention of Blecks and gyps could be tolerated]. Anyhow, politicos in mansions only had to meet immigrants when they became gardeners, waiters, drug pushers and nannies to the West’s new religious elite of mediocre farts in suits.

Central American immigrants get on the so-called La Bestia (The Beast – the ‘death train’ [as Mexicans called it] owned by Kansas City Southern Rail) cargo train, in an attempt to reach the Mexico-US border, in Arriaga, Chiapas state, Mexico on July 16, 2014.

Could these be the “unaccompanied migrant children” for whom President Hussein Obarmybinladen was forking out $50M of taxpayer dosh to provide a welcome holiday camp – equipped with 66 staff, tennis courts, jaccuzis and an Olympic-sized swimming pool? Indeed it could. Well, these and the other thousands of central and south Americans entering the States daily by other means! Pro tem., the illegals were sent without warning in unmarked [unbiographized] batches of 200 to astonished governors to assist the illegals’ delight in the USA and increase the joy of diversity in mainly-White states like Nebraska (Wall Street Journal, 12 vii).


 As Obarmamaniac America withdrew its worldwide policing services so as to concentrate on dishing dosh to Blecks and Specs, the national airline of Malaysia [IQ 92], not content with losing 300 of its passengers in the Indian Ocean, felt bold enough, in the absence of firm US guidance, to fly another 300 through the war zone of eastern Ukraine which had resulted from German ambitions to expand the territory of the EUSSR. Still, the resulting fearsome accidental carnage (as Flight MH17 was brought down) was amply matched in a couple of days of deliberate Muesli murdering in the Middle East (Front Page, 19 vii):

Jihadists have killed 270 Syrian regime fighters, civilian security guards and employees since seizing a gas field in Homs province. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights described Thursday's takeover of the Shaar field as "the biggest" anti-regime operation by the Islamic State (IS) since it emerged in the Syrian conflict last year. The watchdog, updating an earlier toll of 115, said it had documented "the death of 270 people killed in the fighting or executed" since Thursday. "A large majority of the men killed were executed at gunpoint after being taken prisoner following the takeover of the camp," said a reporter. "Eleven of the dead were civilian employees, while the rest were security guards and National Defence Forces members," he added. Abdel Rahman said a counter-attack by regime forces on Friday left 40 IS militants dead.

So who was going to get a grip? – Probably Russia which – if at great cost to itself, and with a certain official subscription to Lenin’s doctrine of political correctness – had managed to keep National Socialism and Islamism under control.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 14, 2014


 As paedohysteria raged in Britain, with virtually no-one prepared to acknowledge that trim young teenagerettes had always been attractive for (and attracted to) men, a rare case came to light of academics doing their duty of discussing the facts of life. The  Sunday Telegraph’s hawk-eyed reporter Andrew Gilligan got wind of a Cambridge University conference held in 2013 (6 vii):

"Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”    

Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds....

Cognoscenti would note the new name for traditional paedophilia (which term had been grossly overextended to include paedosadism with babes in their cradles). Even so, Gilligan’s piece would probably have sent quite a few Cambriensians scuttling back under their stones for cover.


The democratic and lawful government of Australia found its tentative move to re-introduce a White Australia policy would require a fight with holy money-grubbing taxpayer-funded High Court überbabblers who professed themselves uncomfortable with Oz returning Tamils to Ceylon (where the astonishingly co-operative Buddhist government was willing to prosecute its feckless emigrants who got their country a bad name) (Sydney Morning Herald, 7 vii).

{The Oz High Court decision to appoint itself in charge of immigration policy had the merit of showing it was not just the European Court of Human Rights that was the source of all silliness; and another merit in bringing out Queensman PM Tony Abbott to defend the Commonwealth principle of the supremacy of Parliament (under the Queen).}

{In fairness to the ECHR, that ‘court’ had graciously decided in the same week to allow elected governments to ban the berker in public places if they were so moved. But this concession to parliamentary authority would be much aided in the West if a robust Australia insisted that its state-paid legal-eagles pipe down (or, preferably, expire entirely).}


As British witch-hunting of  kiddyfiddlers reached a new high, with 115 top politicians, TV personages, military supremos, royals, sportsmen and civil servants being thrown on to the tracks for alleged hanky-panky in the 1970s, the exercise was at least doubted by one elite figure, the conservative-liberal ex-Cabinet minister David Mellor, writing in the Guardian (7 vii). Mellor, an ex-MP who had had his own experience of press persecution (over the details of his affair with an actress), properly pointed out that the 115 possible paedophiles had already been investigated and cleared in a 3-year effort by the Home Office which had met with satisfaction from the chief lynch-mobber of the time (one Geoffrey Dickens MP who could hardly pronounce ‘paedophilia’).

    {That Britain should embark on multiple multi-month ‘enquiries’ into ancient possible  naughtiness was beyond belief – except in so far as paedohysteria had become the major form of self-righteousness across two generations of socialism undermining the family and 50% of Brits obliging by divorcing, sodomizing, m*sturbating or just never marrying in the first place. Why could not just 5 of the 115 cases be re-investigated in a week’s work by a couple of cops, and – if they found nothing -- any dissatisfied puritans told to pay the bill for any fuller ‘enquiry’ themselves?

Where would it all end? Already the Queen was embroiled by her friendship with gifted and much-loved Oz knicker-fondler and neck-nibbler Rolf Harris; but, if the hysterics could not find more paedotolerance in the Royals (already Prince Andrew had drawn fire for his cavorting with distinctly youthful gals in America), perhaps the hysterics would demand ‘enquiries’ into and re-prosecution of Jesus – who was, after all, suggestively recorded in the Gospels as having spent the night alone with a naked boy whom He had resurrected and who subsequently was perhaps the boy with Him (in just a loincloth) in the Garden of Gethsemane [where Jesus was arguably nicked for paedophilia/pederasty with the boy and Judas] and (in white) at the Tomb of the Resurrection (Secret Gospel of Mark; Mark x 34; Mark xiv 50-52; Mark xvi 5; John xi)....}


 Northern Europe had cause for celebration as both the Dutch and German soccer teams got through to the world footie semi-finals, and with teamwork Germany sensationally beating mulatto Brazil 7-1 (albeit the Brazilnuts were hampered by injury to their star striker, by teeming rain and by their own wild fouls). Whether this fantastic victory would impress previously knocked-out EU countries (England, Italy, Scotland, Spain etc) remained to be seen; but for footie-mad Brazil (IQ 87 – Lynn & Vanhanen, 2006, IQ and Global Inequality, p.56; and £11B in debt for their enthusiasm to host the World Cup) and for fans of White-Bleck-Redskin interbreeding it was an utter humiliation unknown since tiny faraway Thatcherite Britain had trounced Argentinia in that country’s chosen Falklands War of 1983.

Riot police were called out all over tearful Brazil as a mob burned out a bus in the international crime capital of Sao Paulo; and German fans understandably sang "Deutschland, Deutschland, über alles / Über alles in der Welt". Nordic supremacy was further re-asserted as Holland beat Brazil 3-0 to win third place in the competition. And bookies offered 6-4 odds that Germany would beat the Argies and take the number-one slot.

More generally, 6K unaccompanied minors were fleeing to the USA each month to escape the mulatto criminality of Central and South America (Observer, 13 vii).


 At the risk of ‘re-inventing’ the wheel,’ researchers in Robert Plomin’s groups (at University College London and King’s College London) reported that attainments in reading and arithmetic among 12-yr children were strongly correlated and both 50% determined by the same genetic factors (Science Daily, 8 vii). However, new authority was given to such time-honoured claims by Plomin et al. drawing on no less that 2,800 British families – containing plenty of twins and children who had supplied DNA data. And the exercise provided a demonstration of just how much nature-nurture research could attract government funding so long as researchers agreed to talk up the importance of nurture and ‘education’ – and, of course, never to talk about eugenics or race (or indeed the g factor...).


A new popular book on the enduring plight of Black people in America was called simply Stop Helping Us! Its Black author, Jason Riley, detailed the striking argument that the efforts of Whites to solve the USA’s embarrassing racial gap, even if well-meaning and not just self-serving (to make comfy jobs for leftists), were actually counter-productive. That the ‘minimum wage’ kept young Blacks out of work and turned them to drug-dealing and crime and sexual fecklessness, and that ‘affirmative action’ pushed Blacks into university courses and jobs where they had high failure rates and dropped out were just two of the observations picked out from the book by (Black) Thomas Sowell in his welcoming summary (for star libertarian and race realist Lew Rockwell’s homepage, 9 vii).


A day after Britain won a £250M deal to supply rockets to India, the quid pro quo was announced by Chancellor George Osborne: India’s national hero Gandhi, a pacifist, was to be honoured with a statue in London’s Parliament Square – alongside the war-winning Lloyd George, Lincoln, Smuts and Churchill. Still, the oddity of this had been matched in Gandhi’s own life by his wanting to hand India to the Japanese and his getting a million killed in the frantic partition that followed his insistence on democracy (which left Muslims in a permanent minority – so millions of them fled to what became Pakistan).

Gandhi was also was an avid supporter of discrimination in South Africa. He only protested at it in so far as he thought Indians should be treated on the same level as the Whites, not the African natives. He also stated that the White race of South Africa should be the predominating race and many times stated that Blacks were no better than the Untouchables in India, where he intended to preserve the caste system (Daily Mail, 10 vii).

(Whether Gandhi shared paedophilia with another left-loved figure having his statue outside Parliament, Saint Martin Luther King, was a moot point – Gandhi usually had a lissome and nubile naked girl share his bed but always insisted nothing ‘happened.’)


 As pressures for more high-level action against long-dead ‘establishment’ paedophiles and Parliament produced two ‘inquiries,’ an inquiry into inquiries, and a threat by PM Daft Dave that he would criminalize any who failed to report suspicions of kiddyfumbling, columnist Sue Cameron bravely brought the terms ‘witch-hunt,’ ‘McCarthyism,’ ‘febrile atmosphere’ and ‘hysteria’ into play and especially mentioned an Australian warning [from Labour PR man John McTernan] that criminalizing non-reporters there had led to officials being “overwhelmed” by gossip as teachers, priests, TV celebs etc realized they had to cover their own backsides by generating a mountain of paperwork for legal contemplation (D.Telegraph, 10 vii, ‘Witch-hunts thrive in a climate of fear’).

(Meantime, Britoid paedohysterics went on their frothing way, complaining that the 80-yr senior judge [Lady Butler-Sloshed] appointed to run one of the inquiries was too much of an establishment figure herself and that her own 30-yr-dead brother [Sir Michael Havers, Attorney-General in the early Eighties] had once declined to prosecute a diplomat suspected of paedophilia who had a ‘connection’ with the Paedophile Information Exchange [a body which may have received as much as £.5M from the Home Office in those far-off days of sexual liberalism and research].)

{The idea of dealing with the multi-million pound mess by quickly passing a ‘statute of limitations – like most European countries (and which I had re the Gajdusek case) – apparently had no appeal to Westminster’s big spenders and their learned friends.}

    Happily, Sue Cameron was joined two days later by the mighty Charles Moore. He not only attributed Mrs May’s planned footling ‘inquiries’ to fear of the paedohysteria which parliamentarians had unleashed and of the public cynicism about politicians (on perpetual half-time, have handed Britain over to the EUSSR); but added that much of the interest in trying to track down unspecified historic paedophilia in high places by un-named figures with unknown results arose from a crude desire to link gropings of the Eighties to Mrs Thatcher.


 After a half century of primatologists preferring to avoid talking about the dreaded ‘general intelligence,’ let alone showing the intercorrelations between cognitive tests run on their animals, researchers in Atlanta, Georgia (led by William Hopkins of the Yerkes National Primate Research Center) bit the bullet and reported a clear, strong and human-like g factor among 13 mental tests given to 99 chimpanzees ranging in age from 9 to 54 (New Scientist 11 vii). Hopkins et al. measured ability in four broad categories: spatial memory and ability; tool use; communication skills; and establishing causality. Tests to remember which of three beakers hid food, for example, helped measure spatial memory, while challenging chimps to obtain visible but otherwise inaccessible food by attracting attention from humans helped measure communication skills.

By combining results from all the categories, the researchers calculated values for g. And, lo, chimp g turned out to be 53% heritable – just like the g factor in man, the authors observed. (The research group had genetic and other data on the animals’ likely relatedness.) "The historical view is that non-genetic factors dominate animal intelligence, and our findings challenge that view," said Hopkins. Chimp IQ differences could not, of course, be attributed to the socio-economic differences envisaged as so crucial by Western social scientists; and being reared by humans yielded chimps no advantage in g.


 The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord George Carey, announced that he had come to support ‘assisted dying’ – in cases of ‘terminally ill’ patients being within six months of death for which they positively pleaded (Guardian, 12 vii). He thus broke with the preachments of most Christian churches (eager to dissociate from Hitler as once from imperial Rome) on the eve of a debate in the House of Lords on assisted dying. Empirical support for him came from Oregon, where assisted dying for mentally competent near-death patients had been legalized in 1997 – with one person thus suiciding per week, entirely unproblematically.

Religious support came from the South African CofE Archbishop, Desmond Tutu. {But the real problems were that low-g people – including many previously normal-g people who had contracted senile dementia [aka ‘Alzheimers’] – were not considered legally competent to choose death or anything else; and that low-g’s often had even no clear wish to die, living as they did (with the help of modern medication) from one ice cream or Teletubby episode to the next [as in the case of philosopher-novelist Iris Murdoch in her dotage].

In truth, the only way out of these problems was to give absolute guardianship of anyone with a Mental Age of less than 5 to a panel [composed of, perhaps, the chief inheritor, the ward’s GP [or deputy], and a close friend (agreed by the heir and GP)] which would be fully competent (by majority decision) to make life-or-death decisions, perhaps once per year. Only by taking g/IQ/MA seriously could the real dilemmas of euthanasia/mercy killing/assisted dying be confronted and handled. Obviously, the panel’s expenses would be met from the ward’s estate.}


 Leading psychologist Dr Noreen Tehrani, who advised specialist child abuse detectives in the Metropolitan, Surrey, Thames Valley and Hampshire forces, said police were under colossal strain from the escalating demands to investigate ancient paedophilia, requiring her to spend her entire time soothing cops’ frayed nerves.

She added that pressure from Westminster politicians forced police to divert attention from children at risk to historical cases. "They are just completely inundated with work, they are beginning to collapse. What I am getting are more and more exhausted officers. There aren't enough officers in these specialist teams and they are overwhelmed," Tehrani said.

The psychobabbler – whose own views on the merits of investigating past paedofiddling remained unknown -- said officers were on the point of collapse, with many going off sick as a growing number of historical claims of abuse increased pressure on already busy teams. She told the Guardian (12 vii) that she would be writing to PM David Cameron and Theresa May, the home secretary, to express her deep concern at the pressures the teams were under.


 Attempts to encourage more girls to study the sciences ‘completely deny human biology and nature’, a male academic claimed. Schools should stop trying to close education gender gaps because innate differences between the sexes mean they will always be drawn to different subjects and careers, according to a Glasgow University psychologist (addressing a beano of British educashunists, and reported in Times Educational Supplement).

Defying conventional peecee wisdom that had infected most psychologists, politicians and physicists themselves, Dr Gijsbert Stoet argued that Britain ‘probably needed to give up on the idea that we will get many female engineers or male nurses’ (Daily Mail, 12 vii). “Do we really care that only 5 per cent of the programmers are women?” asked the brave heretic psychologist. “I don’t care who programs my computers. A wealthy, democratic society can afford to let people do what they want.”


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 07, 2014


Fresh from paying dotty, daft and murderous Arabs to return to their Middle East, which they were busy destroying (q.v.), Australia took on the Britoid establishment as Rolf Harris, CBE, OBE, MBE, Officer of the Order of Australia, 84, and Queen Brenda’s favourite painter, was jailed for his ‘manipulative’ ‘paedophilic’ gropings of forty years previously (he even kept one pleasantly speckled young girl – a “spiritual healer” -- in the boathouse at the bottom of his multi-million Thameside garden, where she gratefully lived rent-free) (D.Mail, 1 vii).

The Irish ex-convict Republican media of Oz could (surely) be relied on to condemn the hounding of a great Ozzie who had never harmed a fly – and whom the hysterics of Murdochized Britoidia planned to prosecute further for yet more happy and harmless malfeasances.

    Ooops! The Oz press too had succumbed to paedohunting and ‘defended’ the Workers’ Republic’s best-known and most honoured export only by making little mention of RH’s case. So RH’s only published defence would be in the UK Daily Mail, insisting he was a thoroughly good egg who could go for years without conspicuous hanky-panky.


 Bleck oil-rich Nigeria, having descended into poverty and corruption in its fifty years of self-chosen independence from Britain (which had nevertheless spent a fortune trying to keep the oil-rich multiculti state together), gawped on aghast as its two-month loss of 250+ virgins was followed by Muesli Procul Harem seizing another 60 gals and bombing to bits the centre of one of the country’s unheard-of overbred cities, killing even more hundreds than Yoko Fartman had managed to slaughter in the previous couple of weeks (Guardian, 1 vii). Such was Black multicult incompetence – even without the assistance of Britain and Nobelist Obarmy.


 World footie host ‘rainbow nation’ Brazil, which had hoped to play up its ‘brown’ mutiracial credentials as part of the ‘World Cup’ fraud, found itself hauled up by the Grauniad (2 vii) for having hardly any Bleck faces among its soccer crowds. Though 60% of Brazilians were Black and they had been freed from slavery since 1888, they were not able to afford tickets at the slow-moving international spectacle which their (overwhelmingly White) masters had arranged. {So how had this economically divided country hung together? Why, they all spoke Portuguese – language being the one ‘bond’ that matters (q.v.).)


 The modern Britoid fashion for hounding and jailing elderly ‘paedophiles’, beginning with popstar Gary Glitter (and failing – except in E’bro’ -- to defend adoptive father-of-46, Nobelist Carlton Gajdusek), in order to demonstrate the saintliness of knicker-flashing newspapers, reached a high point as precisely no-one came forward to defend Welsh-parented Australian bottom-pincher celeb Rob Harris, 84. Even HMQ Brenda went into hiding with the (wide-mouthed) portrait that the much-loved moustachioed Ozzie had made of Her in 2005 (D.Mail, 2 vii).

And fresh rumours circulated of knicker-naughtiness in the House of Commons of the 1980s – possibly involving the later-promoted Lord Brittan, who may have consigned files on 114 high-flying paedofumblers to the shredder.

{Heaven forfend! Soon Queen-Empress Victoria would be hauled up for her Scottish assignations of the 1880s – accusations driven by self-righteousness, lack of printable news (about Britain’s abject failures in Afghooniland, Eyeraq and Euroland) and total cowardice about discussing Britain’s failure to deal with its own Bleck and Muesli problems.}

{Would Oz step up and defend its illustrious Groper Harris? No chance! – Australian independence, humour, tough-mindedness and scorn for Britain’s elite had their limits!}

* One ‘victim’ complained she had been “abused” and “attacked” by the genial Harris for sixteen years, during which the two of them had sometimes engaged in oral sex – all this ‘molestation’ having never led her once to complain to her doctor, her father or a policeman. – She was of course, in the paedohysterical jargon of the day, ‘traumatized.’


 Thirty years after everyone knew Black Mueslis were cutting off their girls’ clitorises in their effort to prevent adultery (a brutal practice which became politely and non-racistically known as ‘FGM’ – female genital mutilation), and Western feminists decided to take no interest in deference to the left’s demand for uncritical acceptance of all ‘minority’ ways, Britoid politicos got themselves front-page headlines for faint criticism of FGM and saying they would do something about it. {Like yanking 10-yr Black girls off planes bound for Nigeria where enthusiastic relatives would ‘cut’ them? You must be joking!}

    More civilized ways of controlling female sexuality were the Buddhist way of keeping all men in a monastery, the Hindu way of confining fertile women with their husband’s mother, the Jewish way of insisting full sex be with the rabbi (or psychoanalyst), the Muslim way of veiling, and the Western way of checking DNA. But the West’s wymmin had no more realism about the essentials of the human condition than had Freud a hundred years previously.


West Africans – paranoid about 60-yr-ended ‘colonization’ – declined medical advice and allowed the fearsome ebola virus – producing diarrhoea,vomiting and death -- to rip through them, killing 1.5K in a month as the minimal-IQ tribalists insisted on their traditional rituals of touching and kissing infected bodies (Guardian, 3 vii). Many thousands more deaths were scheduled.


 Emboldened by the European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg) deciding it was OK to ban the burqa – or at least the kneecap – leftie and feminist-fawning journalists came out to witter that (after forty years of their multiculti toleration of female enslavement, female segregation and female genital mutilation) they really quite favoured a little bit of facial unveiling so as to allow proper social interaction and inspection of how much bruising hubbies had inflicted (e.g. Independent, 3 vii).

{Such was progress for the feminoids and hangers-on as they got a legal green light to support integration over the primitive tribal practices of Mueslis who had never read the Koran – even if they had learned it off by heart. Whether lefties would ever get round to demanding the execution of Muesli traitors who travelled to the Middle East to train in suicide bombing so as to kill as many Jews as possible remained to be seen.}


  French police in Calais were arresting as many as 600 gyps/Blecks [cowardly newsies dared not mention the racial composition, but were still allowed by peecee thought police to display photos] in a single day after baton-beating them and bulldozing their camps – from which the ‘EU’-welcomed ‘immigrants’ tried nightly to smuggle themselves underneath lorries bound for welfare-state Britain (D.Mail, 4 vii).

It was a thankless task, said the gendarmes, since EUSSR slave-labour-loving ‘law’ allowed the third-worlders only to be sent back to their ‘point of entry’ into the EU – from which they promptly returned to Calais in their efforts to reach heaven-on-earth (for indigent paupers) UK.

Calais Mayoress, Natacha Bouchart, had long argued that Britain’s “generous welfare system” was the real cause of the migrant crisis in her town. {Master-race Germany stood idly by, presumably waiting quietly for other EU countries to destroy themselves by their pathetic peecee liberalism. How Hitler would have laughed!}


 A year of dire British failure (at rugger, cricket, soccer and tennis; and with the EUSSR united against it after 500 years of every schoolboy – perhaps not those at Eton – knowing Britain had to divide the Continent), the country – long thought a bastion of common sense, freedom and good humour – disgraced itself by jailing for SIX YEARS a much-loved and honoured Australian celebrity, 84, while not producing a shred of evidence of real harm from the venerated Ozzie’s attentions (one girl had let the ‘attacks’ continue for 16 years).

Meanwhile, short of news because no-one could explain the 2008-10 financial crash (in fact due to America compelling over-lending to Blacks), MSM busied itself with the possibiility of a ‘paedophile ring’ in Westminster of the 1980s – though all details had been properly shredded as unevidenced idle rumours by officials.

{Having netted such celebs as Gary Glitter, Max Clifford, Cyril Smith, Stuart Hall, Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris, how much further could tabloid paedohysteria go? Could deceased U-turning EUrophile PM Ted Heath (bachelor choirmaster and sailor) be the next victim? In fact, there was probably not a man in the country who could not be slung into clink for ancient ‘abuse’ if desperate pressmen – fearing the ever-growing internet challenge to their peecee ‘news’papers – were so minded.}

    And, no, the SIX YEAR sentence proved entirely insufficient to the paedohysterics of the Guardian, D.Mirror and BBC. Criticizing RH for putting his victims on the witness stand (where the worst the women could recall was RH having made them feel ‘dirty’ and ‘anxious’ as they returned for his next advances forty years ago), the hyperpunitive frothers appealed against the ‘leniency’ shown to RH (who had not left any tangible injury from his fumblings) and wanted him re-sentenced under any ‘guidelines,’ ancient or modern, which could at least double the length of his imprisonment and ensure he died in jail.

    The art world, too, moved to dissociate itself from RH – even losing his portrait of the Queen. For the Telegraph (2 vii), Andrew Brown observed:

"But is it right that a lifetime's art should be obliterated from the public consciousness because the artist who made the work happens to be a bad man? I can see the emotional motives behind that policy, but it does not make any sense. Once a work of art is made it takes on a life of its own. It is separate from its creator, and appreciated as an object in its own right. You wouldn't destroy a car if a worker in the factory where it was made turned out to be a murderer, would you?

Caravaggio killed a man in a fight. Wagner had some horrid views. Eric Gill admitted, in his diaries, that he had sex with his two young daughters. He also conducted "experimental sex sessions" (in the words of his biographer Fiona McCarthy) with his dog. Yet his monumental sculpture of Ariel and Prospero is a London landmark above the entrance to [the Beeb’s] Broadcasting House in Portland Place. And Westminster Cathedral authorities have no intention of removing his limestone, low-relief Stations of the Cross despite periodic protests.

    To which it could easily be added that the lives of many great artists left much to be desired: homosexuality (Michelangelo), paedophilic inclination (Shakespeare), underage girls (Vivaldi), brawling (J.S. Bach), polygamy (Schiller), V.D. (Schubert), unfaithfulness (Dickens), opium addiction (Baudelaire), self-harm (Van Gogh), pederasty (Wilde), drinking (Hemingway – and virtually all C20 American winners of the Nobel Prize for Literature), choirboys (Britten), smoking (Hockney), promiscuity (Lucian Freud) etc, etc.

    Thankfully the celebrated RH – though a great child entertainer rather than an artist of any stature -- remained dignified and stoical throughout his ordeal, evidently accepting there was nothing he could do about the feminoid Inquisition. At least he had the satisfaction of witnessing such 100% hysteria that it could not possibly be right."


  As explained endlessly by hereditarians to behaviourists (like M.J.A. Howe, e.g. in The g Factor, 2000, and in Brand et al., ‘Why ignore the g factor?’, 2003), even oodles of practice are correlated with only slight advantages in performance – perhaps 20% for sportsmen and musicians (some of whom practice all day long) but for only 2% in many other areas like arithmetic and reading (D.Mail, 4 vii).

The latest re-invention of the wheel ooops research to this effect came from Princeton and did not even control for the likelihood that superior performers were more motivated to spend more time practising. {Yes, Oxford of the 1960s educated me as a behaviourist so well that – helped by generous grants, pocket money for running rats for girls, and by a plum prison service job – it took me a decade to work out that behaviourism was largely rubbish.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 30, 2014


 As multiculti Iraq headed beyond the wildest mayhem which the idiotic West had inflicted on Libya and Syria, at least the invading Solunnis claimed they favoured ethnic partition. By contrast, the governing Shitites under Pres.TakeALeaky wanted to hang on to the whole country (with – minimally forthcoming -- American help). The Shitites of neighbouring Iran also clung to the imperial vision which bizarre Western support for demakrazy had assisted (but they did not want US help – quite the opposite); and the Turds of the north, while treasuring their autonomy, wanted all possible help to protect them from Solunnis.

{Whether the Solunnis’ proper limitation of their ambition would long survive them seizing Baghdad’s gas and electricity plants remained to be seen; but all sides could rely on the West backing its 11-year loony dream of a unitary Iraq in which the country’s various psychopathic death-wishing groups would get on just swimmingly....}


 After Detroit began its long-promised cutting of water supplies to non-payers, campaigners for human rights began to pester the United Nations to denounce American authorities and take over the running of the bankrupt half-Black city (Independent, 23 vi). In a letter, the Blue Planet Project wrote:

“The case of water cut-offs in the City of Detroit speaks to the deep racial divides and intractable economic and social inequality in access to services within the United States. The burden of paying for city services has fallen onto the residents who have stayed within the economically depressed city, most of whom are African-American. These residents have seen water rates rise by 119 per cent within the last decade. With official, understated unemployment rates at a record high and the official, understated poverty rate at about 40 per cent, Detroit water bills are unaffordable to a significant portion of the population,”

It was thought that as many as 30K households would be cut off or in line for cutting off by September.


Britain, which had bankrupted itself and lost its Empire fighting two World Wars against German hegemony, then set off on the indulgence of a ‘welfare state’ which turned out to be for even the third world (whose criminals and warmongers could not be deported, let alone detained or shot), found it had not a single friend in Germany’s Fourth Reich (itself set up along British lines and with lawyer-beloved British encouragement of ‘human rights’).

As nice boy PM DD (if ignorant of Magna Carta after his Eton ‘education’) picked a fight to oppose arch-federalist (arch-unifier, in newspeak) Herperson Juncker becoming supreme topwallah of the EU, he found hardly one ally among the EU’s 28 countries. Even the PM of ‘friendly’ Poland (whose emigrants had made Polish Britain’s second language) denounced Shamoron as “incompetent or idiotic”; and the only argument that Britain’s politicos could muster against Buncker was that he liked to have a cognac with his breakfast and sometimes dribbled.

Yes, good-humoured once-sea-protected Britain had embarked on breeding a low-IQ Irish, Black and Pak underclass but found its daft egalitarian illusions by-passed by the bureaucratic quasi-liberal efforts of the likes of Buncker, Herperson Rumpy-Pumpy and “unf*ckable tub of lard” [said ‘bunga-bunga’-partying Italian overlord Silvio Berlusconi, by then serving time after years of lack of support from Britain] Reichskanzlerin Merkel.

Bye-bye history; hello Germany (which was still in with a sporting chance on footie’s World Cup)! Having failed to oppose political correctness – which it had indeed invented – Britain was to find the Continental version of it imposed from Berlin which accepted as restrictions on Mueslis and kindred scroungers and traitors only regulations which were also applied to its own natives (i.e. plenty – such as requiring people to have registered names, signatures and addresses, elementary details of modernity with which Britain had never come to terms, allowing every ‘British’ Tom, Dick or Muslim Harry to vote multiply by post as specified by her Muslim master).

    {Germans would be shocked to learn that most Brits no longer have readily findable addresses -- street numbers having been semi-abandoned [especially by shops]. Flats caused extra problems, the same apartment being variously designated a 3, 2F1, 2FR or just as nothing as street entryphones became overwritten by changing occupants.

People on my own E’bro’ street, South Clerk Street [in bijou Newington, say estate agents], just a mile from the centre of Scotland’s capital, find it hard to get loans and storecards because the street does not exist, being registered officially [in the Electoral Register] as Clerk Street South.

For three years a German firm called ‘e.on’ has been hounding me – with countless threatening letters and even sending heavies with mallets -- for a gas bill in the names of (variously) Mr Jonathan Scott and Mr Jonathan Wood – neither of whom has the slightest connection with my flat [where I have lived for thirty-five years and paid Scottish Power for gas].

Just what such a country is doing running nuclear Trident-firing subs and planning an enormous ‘Queen Elizabeth II’ aircraft carrier for 2022 is beyond me. Britain is nice and friendly and has the best pubs, greenery, decorous fillies, fish&chips, rosbif and festivals in the world; but it is scruffy, potholed, underpainted and broken by half-a-century of non-elitism. And don’t get me going about the schools – see TgF, Chapter 4!}


  That footie was a gents’ game played by hooligans was horrifyingly exemplified as soccer superstar Luigisqueejee Suarez (a dog playing for Uruguay, though usually for an Irish-Liverpool club) was filmed biting an Italian opponent – making the third time that LS’s cannibalistic tendencies had been caught by TV.

 England could thus take consolation for having been defeated in Brazil by LS’s two goals – scored by a minimally reconstructed dog ooops chimpanzee of mixed race; and even for managing only to draw with Latin America’s tiny Costa Rica – a 10% Black and Amerindian Spanish colony which no Englishman could locate on the map.

Footie’s other problems, of gross bribery and corruption (by Qatar and Ghana), remained to be sorted by the sport’s governing frauds in its FIFA council. Champions Spain had also been knocked out of the ‘World Cup’ by third-world players of ‘the beautiful game.’ (By 2012, central-American mixed-race cities had overtaken even those of Africa in their recorded murder rates – Guardian, 25 vi.)


 As Britain’s media pundits pondered openly the likely return ‘home’ of some 500 ‘British’ jihadists madly let out to travel to arm and train with Mueslis in the Middle East, all the usual peecee lies were trotted out. ‘They have suffered British racism’ – when in fact Solunnis and Shitites were at each others’ throats and other parts far worse when never having heard a word of English (except on TV – always a bastion of politeness about Muesli murderousness). ‘They just need education’ – when in fact Britain’s home-grown terrorists (like the 2005 bombers) were distinctly over-educated. ‘The Jews took their land’ – when in fact the Jews had taken little but desert and stimulated Arab rage by their fantastic high-IQ success in unpropitious circumstances. ‘Christians are foolish to think of more crusading’ – when they didn’t, but oil-fired Mohammedanism had won serious enemies in Russia, China, Thailand, India etc while only getting pathetic calls for (largely unrequited) ‘tolerance’ in the West. The robust Leo Mckinstry threw in some extra observations (Daily Express, 23 vi):

"[By] far the worst error has been the state’s addiction to immigration and multiculturalism. Domestic jihadism is the direct creation of a political class obsessed with open borders and the transformation of our society’s structure. Thanks to these two strategies, the Muslim population of Britain has now reached almost three million, while one in ten British children under the age of four is Muslim.

The pro-immigration brigade tells us that this is no problem, since the “vast majority” of Muslims are moderate. But that is more self-deceit at odds with the evidence. One independent survey showed that 40 per cent of Muslims here want to live under Sharia law {they like female enslavement}; another revealed that 32 per cent of Muslim students at university felt killing in the name of religion is justified.

    Such attitudes have been reinforced by the state’s fixation with cultural diversity which, instead of promoting integration, encourages migrant groups to cling to their traditional customs, practices, even languages. That is how we have ended up with Muslim enclaves dominated by the burkha, sharia tribunals, forced marriages, and ballot box fraud. Nor do the mosques do much to promote social cohesion. A recent study found that, out of Britain’s 1,700 mosques, just two follow a modernist interpretation of the Koran, while a quarter do not even allow women on the premises."


Lucky science writer Nicholas Wade was given column inches in the Wall Street Journal (22 vi) to re-present his ‘London School without the London School’ view of race: that race was real, with a genetic basis, but with lots of  overlap and no great specifiable differences – certainly not in little g! – that would upset Wade’s substantial following of scientists who preferred to avoid or even deny the importance and deep-seatedness of race differences so they could keep their jobs amid leftist hysteria.

Amusingly, Wade acknowledged five races, just like the great race-realist anthropologist Carlton Coon; but Wade picked Red Indians ooops Native Americans as his fifth distinct group rather than the Kalahari Bushmen whom Coon had preferred. {RIs/NAs are basically East Asians who avoided the horrors of the Himalayan Ice Age by getting across the frozen Bering Straits into America.}

More to follow on Wade’s challenge to Steven Pinker for leadership of the London School which the two non-psychologists had themselves done so much to pooh-pooh.


  A 2014 ‘Kindle’ imprint of Jared Taylor’s impressive 1992 White-realist declaration was accompanied by a fine review of American elite hysteria about race (VDARE, 21 vi) – though judiciously not mentioning the race realists of the London School.

{America, even as it collapsed into Blackness/Hispanicity and ‘White guilt’ [designed at once to help socialistic strivers and the peace-seeking overclass], was big enough to allow a tiny outlet for JT and friends – though at risk they would soon be put down by ‘human rights’ groups such as SPLS.}


After years of abandoning its famous White Australia policy and admitting a wide range of swarthy multiculti Arabs etc, Australia (under new management from The Queen’s College, Oxford) started paying up to $10K to each self-styled refugee from the Lebanon, Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan etc to board boats taking them home from the Pacific islands of Nauru and Manus on which Oz had detained them (AmRen, 23 vi). ‘Enough was enough,’ thought the new PM, Tony Abbott. ($10K was no incentive for others to head for Oz; and it was surely less than the average annual cost of feeding the ‘refugees,’ housing them, schooling them, treating them, jailing them, re-habilitating the kids they addicted or molested, and giving medical treatment to the people they assaulted....)

    By contrast, in Britain, a miserable week of national sporting failure, despite increasing use of ‘star’ multicults, culminated in the polls showing the country’s three main sweet-peecee-talking party leaders all more unpopular than ever in recorded history – and in particular with ‘modernizer’ PM Daft Dave having to silence bishops who mentioned ‘no go’ areas among Mueslis in Birmingham and Cardiff and finding himself with only one friend (Hungary) in the EUSSR as he failed 26-2 to restrain the ‘advances’ to gypsy-friendly federalism which he himself had long backed. {Roll on, Oz!}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, June 22, 2014


 Following PM DD’s demand (q.v.) for his Education Secretary to impose ‘British values’ [pronounced ‘vaaalues’ by DD’s predecessor, PM GB] Birmingham’s Muesli children – in taxpayer-funded schools which Britain had allowed to become 98% Muslim -- good-humoured discussion continued in MSM, good-humoured not least because no such British values could be found (except perhaps thrift/miserliness for Scots of the past and politeness/hypocrisy for the English) nor any way of teaching/training any distinctive values that might be discovered.

The Observer’s Frank Boyce wisely observed (15 vi): “The trouble is you can't teach values. You transmit values by living them. Well, actually you can teach values but you need a gulag to do it in. "Values" are what we call laws or ethics when they become part of the culture. When we start to breathe them. You can't Ofsted them into existence.”

Especially for the Ango-Saxon-Normans who had come to dominate the world, their values were expressed in their language, literature and conversation. So, without a good command of English, and kindly regard for Britain and its Queen and Parliament, Mueslis would not have a hope – any more than did the Frogs who preferred to live by rigid principles of Catholicism, Revolution and Anti-Semitism until they came unstuck by their truth-denying postmodernism, high-taxing socialism and importation of 7M Mueslis. Yes, it all came down to Shakespeare – and perhaps to Swift, Burns, Dickens and Dylan Thomas.


 A new high point of hilarity about the multiculturalism of the West’s political class was reached as its most expensive investment in peecee, ethnicity-blind, demakrazic Iraq came to grief, with America having to beg Shitite Iran to save Eyerak from the fast-advancing Solunni brutes whom the West had unleashed in Syria, killing or displacing 500K Syrians but thinking to topple Shitite/Alawite Basher Assad so as to achieve something from the ‘Arab Spring’ with which the West had messed up Egypt, Tunisia and Libya.

Eyeran – which should have had its cities cleared and bombed, along with those of Saudi in the aftermath of 9/11, to teach Mueslis a lesson – would presumably demand retractions of such economic sanctions on it as the West had managed, and a suspension of Western bullying over its programme to develop nuclear weapons with which Shitites could confront the ‘moderate’ governing Solunnis of America’s ally, Pakistan.

    As the hilarity unfolded, it was revealed that PM DD actually sported in his Downing Street office a portrait of Etonian PM Harold Macmillan, the cuckold who had accepted American takeover of the Middle East at Suez, 1956, and gone on to become the biggest laughing stock in British history, infamously presiding over the ‘winds of change’ which consigned Africa to barbarism, and to being betrayed by his own Cabinet member, John Profumo, who had been jumping into bed with the mistress of a Russian-Communist naval attaché. A fitting end to years of multiculti nonsense – even if it gave a green light to Scotnats who notoriously joked ‘You can’t be English – You’re not Black’!


 In line with what had been advocated in this blog, the annual British Social Attitudes Survey revealed that 95 per cent of the population thought the English language was the cornerstone of Britishness (Daily Mail, 17 vi). Politicos searching for what to teach Muesli children in Birmingham (q.v.) thus had their answer on a plate.

{Presumably respondents excluded the mumblings of Hollywood actors which passed for English in the film industry....}

The poll, which had been run every year since 1983, found there has been a hardening of attitudes agains immigration since 2000, when the Labour government admitted it would let in European gypsies without restriction (to fulfil its EU duties); and the percentage of participants who believed that people must speak English to be British had gone up from 86 to 95.

{Just why politicians and educators had not insisted all along on command of spoken or written English at, say, a 10-year-old level by all but the mentally subnormal was a mystery – unless it was part of a deliberate plan to create a slave society of Labour voters.}

    Acknowledging the new survey, Tory ex-Chancellor Norman Lamont said that something should be done and that there should be more honesty in debate; and he specially noted that a 2008 inquiry by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee (of which he was a member) found – like OECD -- no evidence for the argument that immigration generates significant economic benefits for the British public.

But he could not bring himself to mention the fifty cowardly years of Conservative co-operation with the invasion, he could not even mention terms like ‘race,’ IQ and ‘gypsy’, and he had no special place for making council housing, benefits and the vote require a reasonable level of English (D.Mail, 18 vi).


 The ethnicity-blind philosophy of France’s 145th Republic took a special knock as one of Europe’s sainted Roma was set upon by 20 vigilantes in balaclavas, who beat him unconscious and left him near dead in a shopping trolley at the roadside. Locals in Paris's troubled northern Seine-Saint-Denis suburb accused the teenager of burglary, at which he had been caught red-handed; but ‘anti-racist’ groups yowled for prompt Presidential action of some kind to enforce Roma rights to reasonable criminality (AP, 17 vi).

    Trouble also loomed in south Yorkshire, where many traditional residents had grown thoroughly fed up with the noise, filth, thieving and intimidation of Slovak Roma gypsies and told any journos who would listen that there would soon be blood on the streets if police did not move on the unwanted eastern European riff-raff (who even bullied locals who flew – unavailingly – the St George Cross while England was – briefly.... – playing in World Cup soccer matches in Brazil) (D.Mail, 13 vi).


 While Arab-on-Arab and Black-on-Black Muesli savagery killed dozens daily in Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Kenya and Nigeria as fanatic Islamists pursued their low-IQ mission to destroy science, culture, education, humour, sport, buildings and bikinis, the self-hypnotized traitor politicos of the West gave cause for merriment as they failed to close a single mosque or even to discuss the invasions from Mexico and across the Mediterranean.

Britain’s own leaders – embarked on inflationary borrowing from the future and the Chinese (who chipped in with £14B after a single day at Buck House with Her Maj) – had never been so laughable since they had lost the American colonies by over-taxation. Even the idea of co-operating with Russia and China to squash murderous Mueslis and get the West’s oil into safe hands seemed not to have occurred to the crackpot apostles of PeeCee – though they did provide fun by grovelling to Shitite Eyeran to match the butchery of the Solunnis of Eyeraq who sought revenge for the multiculturalism of Revs Bush and Blair.


 Faced with the collapse of the multicult Iraqi ‘Army’ which it had trained (at the cost of $40B), America heaped merry confusion on confusion by demanding as a cost for its drone support against fast-advancing Solunnis that its demakrazily chosen Shitite ‘leader’ of the country which it had failed either to divide or rule, ShakeTakeALeakyInDeKhazi, must stand down so as to give PeeCee co-operation of death-wishing ethnies another chance in Badhdaddyo.... (Indie, 19 vi).

Black Obarmyland would rather maintain its multiculti scruples than acknowledge pacifist American incompetence and (its only option after years of nonsensical school-building) side with the relatively-White Shitites to control the Levant and beat the hell out of the maniacal 9/11-funding Solunni Saudis. TakeALeaky promptly refused Obarmy’s call for him to resign.


 Feminoids were aghast as Oxford police – after weeks of taxpayer-funded deliberation – announced they would not prosecute the President of the (famous) Oxford Union for alleged rape and attempted rape after a boozy party arranged by lunigals to demonstrate their capacities. ‘Human rights’ activist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman, Interpol secretary-general Robert Noble, US entrepreneur Julie Meyer and David Mepham, the UK director of ‘Human Rights Watch,’ had all pulled out of debates at the Oxford Union, citing feministic ‘concerns’ about ‘rapist’ President Benjamin Sullivan and doubtless placing his political career in peecee jeopardy (D.Mail, 19 vi), so he would have to go in to banking.


 E’b*gger’s International Festival got off to a punishing start for its lefties as a French cartoon film about moany Jewish-American ‘Noam Chomsky’ {who had famously discovered in the 1960s the subject-predicate grammatical distinction which I had been taught in primary school in the 1950s} delivered not his personality or politics but just quasi-quasi-philosophical burbling of terrifying inanity.

The only high point came as there were loud guffaws when the clapped-out scholar said that humans, having all come ‘out of Africa,’ were all cognitively equal. Sadly, this robust response {Guess whose?} to the great pensioner’s nonsense was not enough to stop him getting a round of leftie applause when the ‘film’ ended; but many of the 200-strong ‘intellectual’ E’bro’ audience would long recall the ribaldry {You’ve guessed whose?} as they went out and doubtless voted ‘separation’/’independence’ for Scotland’s hodge-podge pseudo-egalitarian mix of Angles, Celts, Irish, Islanders, Borderers, Protestants, Protestants+, Cafflicks, farmers, drunks, oilmen, hoteliers, cowardly academics, distillers, welfare-dependents and sing-song socialists....


UK taxpayers awoke to learn that HMG made an average profit of £13 on each of the .5M passport applications which it had delayed for months as it was inundated with desperate pleas from abroad (where it had closed scores of offices to cope with cheating by Africans, Arabs and Srindopakeshis) (Guardian, 21 vi).

In addition, the Pissport Office – under fat anti-‘nasty’ Tory ‘modernizer’ MotherTheresa – had provided much job creation as Brits paid for holidays which they could not take and paid psychiatrists’s bills for themselves and spouses arising from their months of statelessness as the Piss artists hung on (without even acknowledgment) to people’s previous passports, citizenship proofs, original birth certificates, original marriage certificates, latest bank statements, latest gas bills etc.

Said the oily Labourite Keith Vaz, who was meant to monitor HMG’s despicable attitudes to its prisoners, the 70,000 surge in pissport applications in January should have provided "the wake-up call" and it was baffling why immediate action had not been taken to avert the "impending disaster" that had finally engulfed the passport agency. Still, HMG had managed to make a profit even at the expense of alienating 1% if the Queen’s subjects, so placeman Vaz felt no obligation to resign in disgust at the gross incompetence of Britain’s baseball-capped Coke-swilling ‘civil servants.’


 Even while Chinese premier LeePingPong beamed politely at the Queen and kindly lent the UK £14B to steer it through its ongoing bankruptcy, he had time to kill thirteen Uighurs in troubled north-west WhiffWhaff Province who had tried to blow up a police station – the thirteen deaded Mueslis being a larger number than ever admitted to be killed by Anglo-American troops in the course of the average month.

    However, violence-craving Mueslis did better in the UK where, as a Cardiff U. medical student of Somali origin turned out to be fighting in Syria, it became clear that Britoid lunacy was allowing Allah-botherers to select a foreign group of killers, fight alongside them and then return to the UK to make recruits and blow up Brits.

By contrast, in WWII, any persons reported to police as having German sympathies were detained – some of them till the end of the War. Apparently, in 2014, Western thinking was to rely on Russia, China and India to contain the Mueslis; and, anyhow, the Mueslis showed every prospect of tearing each other limb from limb in Iraq while the West gobbled up the oil from Iran and Saudi.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 16, 2014


 Faced with Black mayhem in American schools, ‘zero tolerance’ [of bad behaviour] policies had been introduced in some areas, resulting in Black delinquents being consigned to ‘sin bin’ schools and, inevitably, in subsequent White Marxoid complaints that such policies were ‘racist.’

But a 2014 study in the Journal of Criminal Justice by criminologists like John Paul Wright found that racial disparities in student discipline resulted from more frequent misbehaviour by Blacks, not racism. The study, “Prior Problem Behavior Accounts for the Racial Gap in School Suspensions,” concluded that higher Black suspension rates were “completely accounted for” by pupils’ own behaviour.

Since racial disparities were caused by student conduct, getting rid of zero-tolerance would not end them. The USA’s left-addled Education Department amazingly responded that there was no evidence of “more frequent” misbehaviour by “minority” pupils. But the homicide rate was 10 times higher for Black teenagers than for Whites.

    An AmRen correspondent added (6 vi):

I agree that the Education Department is basically full of bull but you have to keep in mind that, with leftists, words mean whatever they need them to mean at the moment. So misbehavior for Whites means whispering in class but for a Black it's nothing short of having to the call cops. Thus when they say there is no evidence for minorities misbehaving more, there is in fact none by their Orwellian standards. Also keep in mind that, to a leftist, Whites are misbehaving just by existing.


 The lunatic multiculti West got a decisive answer to its ethnically disrespectful trillion-dollar effort to impose demakrazy on Eyerak as Solunnis rose in conjunction with al-Queerdo (and its harder-core maniacs of ‘ISIS’) to take over Mosul (Iraq’s second city, about the size of Glasgow). The operation took just a day, as .5M Shitites fled for Baghdaddy, where they believed their American-imposed leader ShakeMaLeakyWackyBaccy would be able to hold out, though the latter’s dictatorial talents were in doubt and he would probably end up supported with Shitite-Iranian help in the southern marshlands of Iraq in which Shitites had traditionally taken refuge from Solunni and Saddamite brutes.

{Yes, unrealistic Western policy had let the Middle East out of control since 1956, frivolously risking the West’s oil supplies along with the lives and livelihoods of the millions of death-wishing Mueslis who had perished or would perish in the inferno of civil war.}


Details of the Muesli plot to Islamicize some twenty Birmingham schools (q.v.) were leaked to journalists ahead of the official revised Ofsted report (correcting a 2013 clean bill of health which had even called some of the targeted schools “outstanding” etc.) (Sunday Mail, 8 vi). Already, in some of the twelve schools now judged inadequate (with some needing “special measures” i.e. big changes of teachers and governors), progress towards mediaevalisation had been made:

Boys were seated centrally and girls at the back or along the sides of classrooms

Girls were discouraged from talking with boys, and were not to take tennis lessons from male coaches

Sex education was minimal, especially regarding yaggery

Training in art and music was also minimal; raffles were banned
Christmas could not be celebrated; Jesus dolls were removed
Western girls were called “White prostitutes” – even in front of 6-yr-old children

Anti-Christian chanting was encouraged by teachers in school assemblies

Teaching in holy war was provided (e.g. suicide bombing)
Posters written in Quranic Arabic were found in most of the classrooms visited.

Blueprints for proceeding with Islamicization were issued to key staff and five swarthy mid-Eastern male ringleaders (several having links to Syria’s rebels) were identified (Sunday Telegraph, 8 vi, Andrew Gilligan). A “culture of fear and intimidation” had been created since 2013, said Ofsted topwallah Sir Michael Wilshaw.

    Apparently, Education Secretary Michael ‘Govey’ Gove was promulgating regulations allowing the suspension, movement or sacking of “extremist” teachers who taught against “British values”; but this seemed vague and wide open to legally aided objections – not least few since few Brits (especially those of Bleck and Pek provenance) would be likely to agree what these ‘values’ were.

Yes, a generation of LibLabCon’s entryism had left Britain’s schools largely defenceless – and indeed obliged to provide free multiculti education to those who admire mullahs who hated the country.

    The ‘Hands Off Birmingham Schools campaign,’ led by former Respect Party leader Salma Yaqoob, said the inspections were carried out in "a climate of political and media hysteria". The personable Ms Yaqoob said the Muslim community was united in rejecting what she called "Ofsted's flawed findings". "We are standing up for multicultural education in this diverse city which is inclusive of all our children," she said. "We totally reject Ofsted's actions and conclusions."

    Faced with confusion as to how much ‘extremism’ could be allowed in schools, and as to who was to run them (governors, head teachers, Birmingham Shitty Council, Govey, ‘Ofsted,’ the unheard-of ‘EFA’ [Educational Funding Agency], Downing Street, the Muslim Council of Britain), Mueslie leaders understandably threatened legal action and said they would have the support of trade unions (doubtless already Islamicized in Brum, or otherwise immured from complaints from White Christians).

What with a Cabinet spat and a week of front-page press, it looked as if the battle for who ran Britain was going to be fought out over Brummy schools – and quite without reference to the simple principle that people should be able to get what they paid for (whether via cash, insurance or government vouchers).

{Yes, privatization would likely provide the only politically manageable answer to peecee liblabcons’ lack of principle and lack of power before the madding crowds of third-worlders which they had admitted to Britain. The country’s state schools would go the same way as had its nationalized industries once these had succumbed to the baleful influence of the trade unions.}

    Aiming to help Govey in his Cameron-imposed task of ensuring the ‘teaching’ of ‘British values’ in his ‘free’ schools...., MSM embarked on supermarket surveys to find what these values were.

Heading the lists were freedom, democracy, responsibility, tolerance and fairness – hardly values unshared by the rest of the Eurasian world and all much circumscribed by PeeCee; and leaving little room for gentlemanship, politeness, sportsmanship, queueing, weather-obsession, gardening, stamp collecting, eccentricity and the love of good-humoured, factually informed, grammatical and articulate conversation which had made Britain best known for providing the Mother of Parliaments. (Govey himself had once quipped that it was rather un-British to talk of ‘British values’; but, faced with PM Daft Dave’s requiring a semblance of integrationist action, he had to change his tune.)

    Many warnings were issued that the takeover of Birmingham schools was just the tip of the iceberg. One came from a moderate Muesli, Mazool Moghal, who had escaped after persecution in Idi Amin’s Uganda and (alongside his happy family life in Britain) had become the chairman of a Muslim thinktank. He anticipated similar trouble in Derby, Oldham, Dewsbury, Leicester and Oxford; and he laid the blame substantially on political correctness which prevented criticism of Muesli extravagances (D.Mail, 11 vi).


Already dimly aware that accusations of ‘racism’ could be issued embarrassingly widely, not only against British imperialists and their wives, Texan Republicans and IQ psychologists – though never against White-hating Black murderers – anti-racists found their ranks joined by the Sunday Times-indicted and Guardian-agreed (13 vi) arch-racketeer of international soccer, a dwarf called Sepp Blatter.

As UK newspapers’ investigations found Blatter’s outfit, FIFA, guilty of taking multi-billion-pound bribes to ‘award’ the hosting of the 2018 Footie World Cup to the impossibly hot Gulf state of Solunni Qatar (e.g. Indie, 10 vi), Blatter reached for the last line of defence and called his media critics “racist” – to rapturous applause from the many African countries which had taken Qatari money in return for their FIFA votes (Guardian, 10 vi).

{Yes, cries of ‘racism’ were perhaps coming to the end of their natural life – though top thinker John Derbyshire reckoned the process would take more than twenty years, in the course of which America would come to resemble Brazil (AmRen, 9 vi).}


 The loony leaders of the multiculti West who had religiously supported half-hearted ‘interventions’ in Afghooniland, Egypt, Libya and Syria to impose demakrazy got their answer as intervened-in Iraq (where the West had toppled and killed its Sunni ally, Madman Insane, and gone on to preside over 300K deaths and trillion-dollar expenditures) dissolved rapidly into civil war, with al-Queerdo-backed Solunnis of ‘ISIS’ seizing the northern city of Mosul (half a million fled) and advancing on the terrified capital Baghdad where the West’s demakrazic processes had left Shitites in nominal control when they should have been concentrated on defending their southern heartlands (where most of the oil was).

Millions would die across the Middle East for the Western illusion that hysterical death-wishing Muesli thickoes could get on with each other – not to mention with the Jews, who Solunnis devoutly wished to exterminate. Iraq’s multiculti army which America had spent billions of dollars to create vanished from Mosul as soon as ISIS got within thirty miles of it – with Sunni generals deserting and linking up with pals in ISIS, and with Shi-ites discarding their guns and uniforms and hastening south to Baghdad where they hoped to pretend they had had nothing to do with supporting America and its favoured democratic leader for Iraq, Shitite TakeALeaky.

More sensibly, the Turds of north-east Iraq had simply ignored multiculti illusions and set up what was effectively their own state – about 99% autonomous of Baghdad.

Meantime, Pakiland, which had given years of sanctuary to al-Queerdo leader binLiner, found more action demanded of it by Solunni Talebans who suicide-bombed Karachi, killing dozens.

Ukraine – following crackpot elections -- moved towards full-blown civil war as its Germanic westerners killed 50 in Donetsk and its Russian easterners replied by bringing down a Kiev plane, also killing 50.

And Afghooniland accompanied its America-pleasing elections with vigorous preparation for bloody tribal strife among its druggy warlords (D.Telegraph, 14 vi).

Not that Barry Hussein Obarmy minded: he already had his Nobel Peace Prize for his idealistic pretence that Muesli lands could do without realistic and iron-fisted Western governance as supplied pre-Suez by Britain and France for 200 years.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 09, 2014


 As academic argy-bargy broke out between Parisian economist Thomas Piketty and London’s Financial Times over the former’s subscription to the time-honoured adage that ‘the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer,’ the Independent’s Hamish McCrae, appealed to by friends, tried to provide a balanced critique (1 vi). An example:

"As far as income inequality is concerned, it does seem to have risen over the past 40 years – though recently not much in the UK. But there are two quirks. One is that incomes had become very compressed after the Second World War. So, in a way, we have been reverting to a more normal spread. The other is that the whole story is skewed by very high returns for specialist skills, notably sports stars, entrepreneurs, top professionals and senior executives. But this is not the top 1 per cent; it is the top 0.01 per cent and even the 0.001 per cent. Knock those off and, in the US at least, the top 1 per cent and top 10 per cent have not significantly increased their share.

Yes, risky specialization – like other gambling – sometimes ‘paid off’; but such cases were dwarved by gambles that failed – resulting even in lasting obloquy for the likes of American Jew Bernie Madoff (wid all de money, in a Ponzi scheme) and Glasgow council house product ex-‘Sir’ Fred Goodwin (whose Labour-backed borrowing for ‘investment’ had brought the giant Royal Bank of Scotland to its knees). The liberation of capitalism certainly had to be matched by limitation of monopoly; but ordinary folk had done well from it, notably in China and welfare-state Britain where even the humblest households had ended up with toasted sandwich machines, flat-screen TVs, video games and mobile phones."


Probably in acknowledgment of Ukip’s success in marshalling voters concerned about the low-quality immigrants and their sprogs who were increasingly filling council houses, schools, clinics and prisons in England, the ‘controversial’ Tory MP Liam Fox and Speccie columnist Rod Liddle were allowed brief hearings (Mail, 1 vi; BBCR4, 2 vi, 09:05) so they could be denounced as pessimistic Thatcherite racist homophobes by bien pensants like Will Self.

Funnily, however, neither satanic figure was prepared to go further than mention MSM’s suppression of news of gangs of Mueslis grooming teenagerettes for sex; and, while vaguely advocating attention to immigration, neither ventured even to mention the words Black, Pakistani, White or Gypsy – so great was their fear of PeeCee’s tyranny and terror and so keen were they to keep their knees under the table at metrosexual dinner parties. Such was the ‘racism’ that dared not speak its name.

    The suppressive hysteria of ‘anti-racists’ was illustrated as the Guardian blamed ‘racists’ in loyalist north Belfast for giving a hard time to two Pak males (breaking the Paks’ windows and swearing at them), yet the report did not trouble to ask the ‘racists’ their names, their affiliations, whether they accepted the label or what their precise motivation had been (2 vi).

{Talk about ‘no platform for racists’! They could not be heard even after going publicly on the attack. Some matters just could not be discussed – like the lack of conspicuous harm to the (now supposedly) 500 ‘victims’ of Jimmy Savile’s paedophilic hanky-panky over a 40-year period. Once a cry of ‘racism’ or ‘paedophilia’ had gone up, thought and debate were closed.}


 Following general comments (in ‘IQ & PC,’ some complaining) about top scientific journalist Nick Wade’s new effort to chart a genetically informed path between environmentocrazed anthropologists and eugenicist hereditarians, a listing of Wade’s beliefs looked as if it could be helpful – beginning with those more acceptable to the London School, as follows:

Human races {of historically non interbreeding families} do exist – contrary to the ‘wisdom’ of 20th-century social science.

Races overlap and shade into each other and sometimes interbreed.

There are three main races: Indo-European, East Asian and African {as the unmentionable Phil Rushton expounded}.

Racial differences are “copious and recent” but of limited significance. For example, E.Asians have an IQ of 105. The last sizeable difference to evolve was 15K years ago, when Tibetans became capable of living at high altitude.

Human differences in intelligence are substantially, though by no means wholly genetic in origin. {Attempts to quantify heritability are best ignored as incomprehensible to students, journalists and probably genomic experts....}

IQ differences are polygenic {as maintained by the unmentionable Hans Eysenck from c.1965}, so the failure of geneticists c.2000 to find any main gene for intelligence is no surprise.

Even if powerful genes for intelligence were discovered, there would be no need for racist thought since genetic influences could easily be “overwhelmed” by social factors {the demonstrated failure of all C.20 improving schemes like Head Start notwithstanding}. German IQ scoring increased from the 1960s to the 1990s {a ‘finding’ attributed to unpublished work by one Ron Unz}.

East Asian prosperity is a myth {notwithstanding its enormous increase since the brutal wars and civil wars of the first half of C.20}.

Racism is repellent and anyhow not available to scientists who deal only in facts {notwithstanding that psychology shows humans unequal in the most important and valued quality of intelligence....}.

The sorry state of Africans and Arabs {not to mention Australian aborigines and Kalahari bushmen} can be ignored as having as yet no scientific basis {even as the more entrepreneurial of them stream into Europe at the rate of thousands per day so as to get away from the duller, poorer and more hideously and insistently cruel, superstitious, misogynistic and lower-IQ of their countrymen}.

Scientists deal only in proven facts {notwithstanding that 99% of science – and 100% of environmentalistic theorizing} is probabilistic in nature....} so racism is wrong, wrong and wrong again. {Further protestation by Wade of his anti-racism (despite believing in races) appeared in Huffington Post, 30 v.}

More to follow.


 Having effectively abolished free speech about race, sex, handicap, paedophilia etc, HMG admitted its next plan: to limit free hearing, by having courts try unnamed suspects using evidence from unnamed witness in secret trials the very existence of which would not be announced and could not be mentioned (D.Telegraph, 5 vi). The new violation of the principle that justice should be seen to done followed years of mounting secrecy (for ‘victims’ in rape cases and for children and social workers in family cases) and was justified as protecting national security in terror cases (where MI5’s methods might otherwise get out – though why these methods required such sweeping illiberal protection was unclear).


 Having gone along with their (‘Conservative’) party’s cowardice about ooops celebration of multicultural diversity, top Cabinet members Theresa May and Michael Gove found themselves pin-ups for the deep confusions and denials of British policy after 9/11 and 7/7 (D.Telegraph, 5 vi). Home Secretary May (famous for dissociating herself from the pre-Cameroonian “nasty party” and for backing wymmin’s rights) said she quite wanted to deport Muesli extremist plotters, ranters, trainee terrorists and welfare dependents but was forbidden to do so by EU human rights legislation which she could not be bothered to defy.

Education Secretary Gove (who had himself written robustly on the Muesli menace – Celsius 7/7) had to deal with the problem of Muslim teachers having come to dominate some twelve state schools in Birmingham, yet Govey favoured schools being free of political control (so long as they did not overtly practise the dreaded selection...). So what to do? Answer: fight like ferrets in a sack, each politico accusing the other of weakness in the face of extremism. {And what was extremism? Where were manageable lines to be drawn between ‘cultural conservatism,’ ‘extremism’ and ‘dangerous extremism’?

Even this elementary question had not been addressed by top politicos who both sought, if not to be PM, to dominate the post-Camoronian ‘Conservatives.’ Let alone did they recognize that Muesli crimes against Westerners required not just punishment but immediate firm responses such as banning beards and burqas in schools, closing or razing mosques and withdrawing welfare benefits and council houses from mullahs.

Nor did PM Daft Dave who ‘solved’ the spat which had spoiled his week (of making HMQ, in full regalia, emerge from a new Oz-built state coach and proclaim before a thousand Westminsterians a 5P charge on supermarket plastic bags...) by insisting on a little verbal grovelling and the retirement of a previously unheard-of civil servant. Meanwhile Brenda’s subjects were left to deal with the Muesli invasion by the time-honoured method of White flight.}


 As Ukip leader Nigel Garage told journos he was “modernizing” his party (apparently bullying its candidates to back all-fat-female shortlists, taxpayer-funded dysgenics, anti-racism and yag ‘marriage’), Ukip lost momentum in a by-election in pretty Newark (near Southwell Cathedral, between Nottingham and Lincoln), managing only to cut the vast ‘Conservative’ majority of 17K by 50% despite the previous Conservative champ having resigned when found guilty of taking payment for asking parliamentary questions for firms (BBCR4, 6 vi, 08:30).

The by-election revealed plenty of desire to punish ‘Liberals’ (who came sixth and lost their deposit after years of their peecee multiculturalism), but voters were evidently not persuaded that Ukip offered much of an alternative.

(Meantime, undenounced by Ukip or any other politicos, Blecks went at it hammer and tongs in Nigeria, killing hundreds of each other till the Nigerian ‘Army’ ran away from the Mueslie captors of 250+ virgins.

Western ‘concern’ focussed rather on Russia’s Vladimir Putin, though P had helpfully withdrawn his troops from the east-Ukraine border, tolerated the killing of 300 pro-Russian irregulars, and turned out in Normandy to humour the West’s idea that its D-Day landings had clinched WWII.)

    Despite the vaguely proposed ‘modernization’ of Ukip, a Survation byelection poll in Newark found that the party’s support was overwhelmingly male – since it had appealed to male tough-mindedness and realism. 36.8% of men supported Ukip while just 16.8% of women supported the party. By contrast, nearly a half of women (47.6%) supported the Camoron post-modernized ‘Conservatives.’


 Showing that gross illiberalism had infected students at even one of Britain’s best universities, the student union of University College London banned use of its rooms for discussion of Nietzsche and other ‘far right’ thinkers (Daily Beast, 5 vi). More than a century after Friedrich Nietzsche suggested ‘God is dead’ and urged us to cast aside the standard rules of morality and move Beyond Good and Evil, a college philosophy society named in his honour was banned for being too nasty.

The Nietzsche Club was barred from holding meetings at University College London after a ruling that discussions about right-wing philosophers could encourage fascism and endanger the student body. As well as Nietzsche, a favorite of Benito Mussolini, the philosophers to be studied included Julius Evola and Martin Heidegger, who had occasionally been cited as inspiration by far-right politicians. The student society was never allowed to hold a public meeting after a series of posters advertising the new group appeared on campus. One asked if there was “too much political correctness?” Another claimed: “Equality is a false God.”

Before those ideas could be explored on university property, the student union stepped in. The fledgling group was banned after the Union Council obliged its Marxists by approving a motion arguing that “there is no meaningful distinction to be made between a far-right and a fascist ideology” and that “fascism is directly threatening to the safety of the UCL student body.” {Free speech on campus – as Mrs Thatcher had tried to arrange? Forgeddit!}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.