Monday, June 20, 2016


Re-invention of the wheel continued by university staff needing a grant – with predictable though otherwise perfectly satisfactory results. See below:

Association for Psychological Science, June 6, 2016:

Psychological characteristics link genes with upward social mobility, according to data collected from almost 1000 individuals over four decades. The data suggest that various psychological factors play a role in linking a person’s genetic profile and several important life outcomes, including professional achievement, financial security, geographic mobility, and upward social mobility.

    The study, led by psychological scientist Daniel W. Belsky of Duke University School of Medicine, builds on previous research indicating a genetic continuum that predicts individuals’ educational achievement. In the earlier study, the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium examined millions of genetic variants in more than 100,000 people and found that these variants could be aggregated and turned into a “polygenic score” that was linked with educational attainment"

Political correctness forbade mention of whether the linking “psychological characteristics” chiefly involved the g factor....


Desperate at the inexorable takeover of the low-class White votes which the left had assumed to be its own, even the holy Huffington Post allowed advocacy of violence against the ‘fascism’ of The Donald (and equally of British Brexiteers and Continental ‘far right’ patriots). See below:

Jesse Benn, Huffington Post, June 6, 2016:

"The rise of Donald Trump has exposed the frightening underbelly of America’s foulest tendencies.  ....Trump has not just flagrantly violated the typical boundaries of political discourse, his candidacy is linked to multiple instances of violence. It shouldn’t be a surprise that opposition to him has responded in kind. Yet, a lot of people seem shocked and appalled at this perfectly logical reaction.

In the face of media, politicians, and GOP primary voters normalizing Trump as a presidential candidate—whatever your personal beliefs regarding violent resistance—there’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this. In spite of this, such resistance is apparently more offensive and unacceptable to societal norms and liberal sensibilities than the nastiness being resisted in the first place. ....Violence that takes place at Trump rallies –- in support or opposition –- is a reaction to the tone he’s set, and the blame for it should land primarily on his shoulders"


As 49 dancing homosexuals were despatched and another few score injured in the early morning at an Orlando, Florida, nightclub, commentators advanced their own favourite causal factors. Donald Trump blamed radical Islam; the Guardian’s Owen Jones – a young yag himself – blamed homophobia; President Obarmy blamed lax US gun laws; some blamed mental illness (for the shooter was a manic-depressive) and drug use (the attacker used steroids; and some blamed PeeCee (the attacker’s craziness and homophobia had come to the attention  of  his employer (a security company – the UK-based ‘G4S’) and the FBI but no action was taken because the attacker was a Muslim.

In truth, all these factors were probably involved in multiplicative interaction with each other and easily so since they covary in the general population. But the central factor was surely Islam: attacker Omar Mateen was a Muslim who sometimes expressed extreme views and claimed membership of Hezbollah and even phoned police to tell of his allegiance to ISICK; his father was a Muslim who, despite living in New York, was a contender for the presidency of his native Afghanistan; Mateen’s wife – whom he beat daily – was a Muslim who made no effort to report his peculiarities to police.

Moreover, whatever the other causal complexities, Islam was plainly partly causal directly to homophobia, intolerance, psychopathic violence and wife abuse. No wonder The Donald was quick to observe that the Orlando horror was a fresh sign of Muesli ‘invasion without uniforms; and that Hillary Clinton’s declining to denounce radical Islam showed she must herself be “crazy.”

Yet ‘liberal’ apologists for Islam threw themselves tirelessly into insisting MSM  attribute the outrage – the worst against yags since the Holocaust -- to nothing but homophobia.

Contradicting any conventional of that sort, it transpired that Mateen was well known to be himself a homosexual; and he had trawled for partners at the club where he would go on the rampage and also online.

    The murderous antipathy of Western Mueslis to yags was confirmed as five Allahmaniacs went on trial in Luton, UK, for urging coreligionists to join and fight for ISICK. A speech was recorded by an undercover officer referred to as Kamal, who spent 20 months infiltrating the Muesli group and recording their meetings (Times, 16 vi).

One Mohammed told the group: “When the parliament are making laws and having Gay Pride today in the UK, Gay Pride, where’s the pride in being gay? There’s no pride in being gay.” He added: “Alhamdulillah [praise to be God] the people haven’t caught you, or it’s high building for you.”


As Brexit maintained for a week a 6% lead in UK opinion polls, the ‘liberal’-left’s darling columnist, Italian-homed Polly Toynbee cracked: the patriotic White working class on whom Polly et al. had relied for tradition-respecting votes (even as the likes of Polly and Owen Jones enthused about such unlikely bedfellows as Islam, feminism, disablism and yaggery were to be denounced as foolish neo-Nazis who would wreck the comfy world of peecee piety that ‘anti-Nazis’ had inflicted on British public life while keeping business sweet by letting foreign slave labour stream in.

More intellectually, Polly began to admit the major re-alignment of Western politics into ‘national welfarism’ vs ‘peecee globalism’ long foreseen in this blog. Guardian, 14 vi.  See below:

"This is the sound of Britain breaking. Here ends our “moderate, tolerant” self-image. Imagine Brexit wins and two years later prime minister Boris Johnson is still embroiled in quarrelsome EU exit talks. ....Barking and Nottingham people will see no change, same migrants, same sense of powerlessness. Recession-hit, facing worse cuts, voters won’t blame themselves for their own folly. Old problems are unresolved – an economy reliant on City and property bubbles, low skills, low productivity, atrophied public services, hopes raised and dashed. [Michael] Gove and Johnson risk losing control of the furies they have unleashed.

    As high-status Ford jobs are swapped for low-paid warehouse work, indignation is diverted daily against migrants.

    That moment is fertile for some yet-worse demagogue who calls for throwing out migrants already here. Expect the volume to be raised against “elites” – anti-parliament, anti-politics, bored of democracy itself. Ignite hatred against Europe, blame Brussels for deliberately impoverishing us in revenge, stirring centuries-old enmities.

    Blend all that with a little nationalistic leftish populism, not all of it bad: nationalise our utilities and rail, eject foreign owners from key industries and property, pump up armed forces and national pride. These are potent ingredients for militant majoritarianism, blaming minorities and minority opinions. The Human Rights Act is abolished and the BBC absorbed into government. National socialism {= Nazism/NSDAP) will no doubt carry a new name – but it’s there in the making"

Polly’s belated recognition of this blog’s ‘realignment’ thesis was supported by top columnist Rachel Sylvester in the Times (14 vi). See below:

"One West Midlands MP estimates that 60 per cent of Labour voters in his constituency are supporting Brexit. “The Remain Labour MPs who go out canvassing are tearing their hair out because it’s so overwhelmingly for Leave. But to be honest I’m shocked that they’re shocked. Traditional Labour voters are not enthusiastic about the EU and they’re furious about immigration.” ....

The truth is that the referendum is exposing Labour’s breach with its traditional voters in a way that has profound implications for the country as well as the party. In Birmingham, campaigners were told to take all mentions of immigration out of their literature. Although the local MPs begged to be allowed to tackle local concerns head on, they were banned from doing so by party staff following instructions from the leader’s office. ....

Labour and the Remain campaign are now, as one former shadow cabinet minister puts it, “reaping the whirlwind” of years of ignoring voters. For those who feel dissatisfied with the status quo — the “left behind” voters who have suffered from globalisation — Brexit feels like the only way of changing their situation in the absence of a credible alternative government. ....

In an era of identity politics, when tribal loyalties are breaking down and culture wars are breaking out, the Labour coalition is fracturing. ....

Labour [has been] turning into one big Islington dinner party offering vegan lasagne to people who prefer beef. One Labour MP says that the [referendum] campaign is exposing growing tensions within his party just as much as among the Conservatives. There’s a rupture between the metropolitan, liberal wing and the traditional, working-class base. The Tory splits are Westminster high politics but the Labour ones are a shifting of the tectonic plates.”

Melanie Phillips (Times, 14 vi) chipped in with “We are witnessing, in effect, a mass uprising across the West against globalisation” – and, she might have added, against globalisation’s bolt-on philosophies of multiculturalism and political correctness which had been forced on cowardly businessmen, state-employed top fat cats and financiers by ‘liberal’-left bullying. – Funny to think that as metropolitan lefties were rejected by a revived Old Labour party, they would have to seek their fortune among cuckservatives just as Christians had historically been sure to maintain bridges with the rich and powerful who in return for a reasonable press kept churches afloat!


As the killing of a well-liked youngish female Labour MP, a keen REMAINer along with her husband, by a 52-yr Yorkshire depressive, weirdo and loner who had once made occasional ‘hard right’ contacts, allowed REMAINer Daft Dave to close the EUSSR referendum campaign with five days of national mourning for the saintly Jo Cox, US columnist David Frum (Times, 18 vi) observed that the West’s recent move towards anti-‘expert’, anti-establishment, anti-PeeCee and pro-nationalist sentiment could be traced to the bizarre infliction of yet more mass immigration by the likes of multiculti-maddened Merkel and Obarmy (and, he could have added, Britain’s slave-seeking Labourites who needed at once to placate money men and to replace the White working-class voters whom Labour had deserted). See below:

"....after only the briefest pause during the deep recession of 2008-2009, legal and illegal migration to the US has accelerated again: about 1.1 million legal migrants in both 2014 and last year, plus more than 500,000 illegal migrants. This pace represents a near doubling of the pace of migration during the deepest years of the recession.

    It has been the policy of the Obama administration to welcome even faster migration in the future. The package negotiated with Congress in 2013 would have doubled legal migration. A Republican mutiny forced its abandonment. Obama responded with orders suspending enforcement against approximately half the illegal aliens in the US: those who’d entered the US as children, then of those who had entered in early adolescence, then later of their parents as well.

    Within weeks of the later orders being issued, tens of thousands of unaccompanied Central American minors surged across the US border. Thousands more have followed in the two years since.

    Even more predictable than this surge are the dangerous cultural and political consequences. Opposition to Obama’s migration policy fuels Trump’s, just as reaction against Angela Merkel’s has animated nationalist movements across Europe.

    Liberals have tended to assume that mass migration is essential to society. But we should have learnt by now that mass migration is one of the greatest threats to a liberal system. In Trump’s America, as in France and Germany, excess migration triggers a backlash among the host population. Borders are as necessary to a free society as laws: they are the first law that makes a country a country.

    Obama has spoken powerfully against Trump’s demagoguery. His criticism might more usefully be directed inwards: for it was his own decisions that enabled the rise of such a simultaneously ludicrous and sinister challenger"

Whether the orgy of mourning for REMAINer Jo would make voting LEAVE on Thursday 23rd – PeeCee’s date with destiny, at least till The Donald got his chance to knock it out in November – remained to be seen. MSM preferred to play up shooter Thomas Mair’s ancient internet links rather than his seeking psychiatric help for a depressive episode just the day before the killing.*

The BBC even claimed that, after a little epilepsy in childhood, Mair had no mental illness*; and it disregarded the amazement of Mair’s brother and mixed-race half-brother at the very suggestion that Mair was ‘far right’ or ‘racist,’ ‘vile’ etc. – he was best known for free tending of old ladies’ gardens and attendance at his public library.

There was nothing to disturb the referendum’s avoidance of serious discussion of mass low-IQ immigration, for all that this was what concerned many voters, especially LEAVErs. Only UKIP guru and LEAVEr Nigel Farage dared an advert giving a flash of ‘Syrian’ pumigrants trekking in their hundreds across Slovenia towards Germany – an advert which had him instantly condemned on the Beeb as a ‘racist’ etc., yet which might just get through to the part of Britain’s proletariat that had not yielded to welfarism and remained proud, pugilistic, pie-scoffing, pint-quaffing, pub-crawling and parliamentary in its love of quick-fire and good-humoured debate in the language which England had given the world but which the forever-warmongering French forbade to the dismal yet dictatorial EUSSR.

*Most likely the enlightened Beeb no longer regarded ‘bipolar disorder’ as an illness – along with such mere ‘issues’ as schizophrenia, hysteria, homosexuality and psychopathy – probably racism, xenophobia, militarism and uninvited caning were the only ‘real’ mental pathologies left....


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, June 14, 2016


As the UK’s referendum on membership of the EUSSR approached with scarcely a mention of the public’s favourite topic of immigration – let alone of race, IQ, Blacks, Arabs, gypsies or Muslims – the Turkish plan for converting Europe to Islam was revealed in the Times by Melanie Phillips (7 vi). Even the most cowardly dullards with their heads in the sand could no longer stay in denial. Turkey’s dictator Recep Erdogan had exploited the ‘Syrian’ pumigrant crisis to demand visa-free travel for Turks into the EU and was a dangerous Islamist who quite openly advocated invasion and takeover.

"....Brexiteers are correct. Turkey is set to funnel untold numbers of new migrants into the EU and then to Britain. Cameron’s statement that the visa waiver won’t apply to Britain because it is outside the Schengen passport-free area is typically mealy-mouthed. Once inside the EU, the fact that Turks will have to show their passports at the UK border won’t stop them somehow coming here.

    A leaked European Commission report also warned that other migrants, including criminals or terrorists, might start trying to obtain fraudulent Turkish passports in order to gain access to Europe. The former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, described the visa waiver as “perverse, like storing gasoline next to the fire we’re trying to extinguish”.

    Cameron and Major are not just slippery but are betraying Britain.

    This crisis also plays into Erdogan’s strategy for Islamising Europe. He has told us this himself. At last year’s celebration in Istanbul of the 562nd anniversary of the fall of Constantinople, Erdogan told a cheering crowd of an estimated two million Turks: “What is the conquest? The conquest is Hijrah [expansion of Islam through emigration] . . .

    “The conquest is Mecca . . . The conquest is Jerusalem . . . The conquest is al-Andalus [Muslim Spain] . . . The conquest is to open the doors of Anatolia up to Vienna for this blessed nation . . . It is to make the sycamore [the Ottoman empire] meet with the ground that would cover three continents and seven climates . . .”

    Judging by his rhetoric, Erdogan wishes to recreate the Ottoman empire and take over much of Europe. It’s an aim shared by the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Islamic State and the rest. The difference is that, courtesy of the EU, he believes he can achieve this without a shot being fired. Brussels will simply open the gates of Europe for its Islamic conquerors to enter.
The revelation that Erdogan had actually gone public with his ambitions would surely boost the UK’s LEAVE vote beyond the level pegging shown in early-June polls"

In view of Melanie’s revelation, it was no surprise that the authoritarian, censorious and punitive Erdogan should turn out to be invited to be the chief orator at the funeral in Kentucky of ‘Muhammad Ali’ (q.v.), who himself had long been a supporter of the Muesli despot’s party and invasion plan.

{Eventually, funeral organizers withdrew the invitation. The violent propensities and dotty beliefs of the seriously non-integratist Nation of Islam, which star member Ali never rejected outright, were brought to the attention of Ali-worshippers by columnist Daniel Finkelstein in the Times (8 vi).}


Progress towards a re-alignment in Western politics – creating national welfarist parties and consigning greedy globalizers, cowardly ‘conservatives’ (cuckservatives), defecting deists, pious pacifists and loopy liberals to holding the peecee baby which they had adopted from cultural Marxists who aimed to end Western civilization – was reported from the famous (though now run-down) coalmining powerhouse of south Wales (Guardian, 8 vi, Aditya Chakrabortty).

“South Wales will be among the most pro-LEAVE places in all of the UK,” said Roger Scully, professor of politics at Cardiff University. “Across Wales as a whole it will be very split between those who want to stay in the EU and those who want to go. But Newport and the southern Welsh valleys are pretty damned likely to come out as an outright majority to go.”

    If this is a protest vote, then there’s plenty here to protest about. Look up from Newport’s Commercial Street, and the honeyed architecture reminds you just how wealthy this city was a century ago, when it exported coal to the rest of the world. The swankiest hotel in town, complete with ballroom, has turned into a pound shop. Where there was once a jewellers now stands a vaping den. The M&S has left, to be replaced with a Sports Direct.

    In the temp agency’s window the magic number is 7.20: the national minimum wage on most of the cards for would-be warehouse operatives, security guards, forklift drivers. Peer down the street and you’ll see the transporter bridge dating back to 1906, its gondola still lifting cars from one bank to the other.

    When that bridge was built more than a century ago, south Wales was one of the big-earning regions of the UK. Now the coal and steel industries have either died or moved, and it’s among the poorest parts of Europe. For every £100 made by a Londoner, a resident of Wales makes £42, going by the calculations of gross value added. Whether under Thatcher or Blair or Cameron, Wales keeps falling further and further behind.

    “The folk memory of Thatcher destroying our communities is fading,” said Iestyn Davies, formerly of the Federation of Small Businesses in Wales. “Now it’s Labour that’s blamed for economic failure.”

    In Newport’s Victorian covered market, far more people were behind the counters than buying anything. The majority of the stall-holders said they were going to vote LEAVE. Did they consider themselves to be winning or losing under “the current system”, I asked, without providing any definition – and yet with no hesitation the leavers replied, “Losers”.

    On the comics stand, Terry reeled off what made him angry: benefit claimants in designer clothes, immigrants taking all the housing, and “Romanian gypsies”. He concluded: “I’m definitely a loser, because I’m financing other people’s lives.”

    The medicine usually prescribed for such post-industrial malaise is devolution, whether that be a “northern powerhouse” or an English parliament. But in Wales they’ve had devolution since 1999. A government with as much autonomy as a teenager in a loftroom, its presence has turned Cardiff Bay into a government enclave, complete with jobs and infrastructure and expense-account restaurants. Wales has its own equivalent to the Westminster bubble, observes Roger Scully: a Cardiff Bay bubble.

    Wales is where trickle-down economics and trickle-down politics meet ­– and driving out from Newport you see the lack of results. Instead, the hills that were black with coal waste in the 80s have now reverted to green. Where once there was mass employment there are now abandoned buildings and warehouse units for one- and two-man bands.

    At the village green of Cwmcarn, Kate and Casey were chatting while their boys played football. Again came the worries about immigrants. “They’re not even here two minutes before getting benefits and operations on the NHS,” said Casey. No, she’d never come across this personally. But it was a worry.

    By local standards, a lot more immigrants have been coming to the Welsh countryside from Poland and the rest of eastern Europe. But there were so few here to begin with that the numbers are still tiny. In Merthyr Tydfil ­– which in all of Wales has seen the highest percentage increase in immigration over the past decade – you are still five times more likely to meet a working-age adult on benefits than someone without a UK passport.

    However invisible the immigrants, they were mentioned by every leaver, in language that I once thought had been dropped in the 80s. “I don’t want to offend you.” Or: “I’m not racist.” Or: “I’ve got mates from Ghana.” Always followed by “but”. But we let too many in. But we need to look after our own. But I hear eastern Europeans turning up at the jobcentre are handed a grand.

    “I can’t help thinking that 23rd June is really a vote on whether it’s OK to be racist or not,” said Iestyn Davies.

    As in Donald Trump’s America, the collapse of the economy and the distrust of politicians has re-licensed opinions that would have been considered unacceptable until recently. And it has led to a new round of the age-old game of ferociously defending meagre prospects and entitlements.

    The very landscape of south Wales is littered with broken promises. The mining communities were offered hi-tech “industrial villages” by Labour. They never came. On the outskirts of Newport stands a giant white plant that was meant to be an LG factory. Millions in subsidies were poured in, the politicians prostrated themselves ­– and the Korean firm still bolted, leaving the site empty for a decade.

    Up the road, in the old steeltown Ebbw Vale, residents were promised a Donington-style racetrack, along with an unlikely sounding 6,000 jobs. The Welsh government pulled the project in April. But still, more wheezes are dreamed up. Better road links. A new shopping mall for Newport, despite a population without enough cash to spend in it.

    Do all this often enough and badly enough, as has happened in south Wales, and the age-old contract between the governing parties and the governed breaks.

    I can’t help thinking that 23rd June is really a vote on whether it’s OK to be racist or not"


As the daft idealism and astonishing incompetence of Empress Multiculti Merkel and her Brussels minions became clear, disaffection with the EUSSR became widespread, a poll of 10.5K Europeans reported in May (Telegraph, 9 vi).

It's not just the Brits: Euroscepticism on the rise all across Europe, major survey shows:

"Anti-Brussels sentiment has risen sharply all across Europe over the past year thanks to a toxic combination of economic stagnation and the mismanagement of the migrant crisis, a new Europe-wide opinion poll has shown.

The Pew Research Centre survey found that rising disenchantment with the EU is not confined to the UK, with Greece, France and Spain also having a majority with an unfavourable view of Europe.

“Euroscepticism is on the rise across Europe with about two-thirds of both the British and the Greeks, along with significant minorities in other key nations, wanting some powers returned from Brussels to national governments,” said the report.

The findings, based on surveys covering countries that account for 80 per cent of the EU population, will strengthen the arguments of Brexit campaigners that Brussels have been too slow reverse the federalist agenda of the 1990s.

In a sign that Europe’s publics increasingly want an end to the principle of ‘ever closer union’, more than twice as many people surveyed – some 42 per cent - said they wanted powers returned to their national parliaments as said they wanted powers transferred to Brussels.

“As the British head to the polls, just 6% of the public in the UK wants such an outcome. And only 8% of Greeks favour more power for the EU. The strongest backing for an ever closer Europe is only 34% -- in France,” they added.

'Much of the disaffection with the EU among Europeans can be attributed to Brussels' handling of the refugee issue, said Pew. 'In every country surveyed, overwhelming majorities disapprove of how Brussels has dealt with the problem.' This was especially true in Greece, which had been overwhelmed by migrants crossing the Aegean Sea from Turkey. Some 94 percent of Greeks believed the EU has mishandled the refugee crisis. In Sweden it was 88 percent, in Italy 77 percent and in Spain 75 percent.

Worse still for peecee globalizers, the Tories’ favorite pollster predicted (7 vi) that Britain would vote to leave the European Union. Lord Hayward, one of the few election experts who had predicted a Conservative majority at the UK general election in 2015,  said that, unless something "substantial" changed, the "balance of probability" was that the nation would vote to LEAVE on June 23rd. The news from the respected analyst came as a blow to Downing Street in the final two weeks of referendum campaigning"


 Amid the week-long multiculti mourning – especially on the BBC -- for boxing legend Cassius Clay, ex-Mirror editor Piers Morgan, alone among commentators, supplied frank detail of Ali’s racism of the 1960s. Not only were White males (“rattlesnakes”) to be killed, but also any Black females who “messed” (had sex) with them. Perhaps unsurprisingly, loose-talking Ali and Donald Trump were friends for decades, with Trump calling Ali “the greatest supericon of my life” and Ali attending one of Trump’s weddings.


 Just three days after being denounced by the Archbishop of Canterbury for mentioning that Syrian ‘refugees’, invited by Daft Dave, might prove as sexually predatory in Britain as they had in Cologne at New Year, UKIP hero Nigel Farage had the satisfaction of Newcastle police charging four Syrian young men (one arrived in Britain only a month previously) with sexually assaulting two 14-yr-old girls at the central St James’ Park – just a stone’s throw from Newcastle United’s soccer stadium (Daily Mail, 11 vi).


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 06, 2016


After Britain’s only well-known and -loved politician, Boris ‘BoJo’ Johnson (Eton scholar and Balliol First), pointed to the thread of German domination in the history of Europe – domination involving Charlemagne [of Aachen, subsequently the coronation place of German kings, and still today in Germany], the Hapsburg family and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation [as German schoolchildren were still taught to call it] -- he was condemned as ‘ahistorical’ by the likes of Labour leader-in-waiting Hilary Benn and Thatcher-traitor Lord Michael Heseltine.

But was it wrong to say Hitler had pursued – if over-adventurously and belatedly in Russia (and without first subduing Britain ) – ancient traditions of German imperialism? What did Hitler himself say? Wikipedia:

"Despite his personal animosity toward [Kaiser] Wilhelm II, Hitler wanted to bring his body back to Berlin [in 1941, from Kaiser Bill’s Dutch refuge] for a state funeral, as Wilhelm was a symbol of Germany and Germans during the previous World War. Hitler felt that such a funeral would demonstrate to the Germans the direct descent of the Third Reich from the old German Empire"

Astonishingly, Mad Mutti Merkel troubled herself to reply to BoJo’s observations: the UK  ‘BREXIT?’ referendum was “completely unnecessary,” said the fat and frumpy Fuehrerin – her authoritarian interventionism being specially remarked in the Telegraph (4 vi) by Simon Heffer, one of Britain’s top twenty intellectuals who were Brexiters/LEAVErs.


  Europe faced a "populist uprising" if it were unable to show people it could control the migrant crisis, said former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove. He was speaking on the BBC's ‘World on the Move’ day on migration issues. Sir Richard also warned against offering visa-free travel to Turkish nationals, describing the move as “like storing gasoline near a fire”(BBC, 16 v). He wanted a Marshall Plan for north-east Africa, but insisted that the West would need to control the north African coastline “more aggressively” than hitherto.


 Commenting on the death of  ‘Mehemet Ali’ (Cassius Clay) at 74, US Republicans’ presidential candidate, ‘racist misogynist homophobe and Islamophobe’ Donald Trump, declared the sensational Olympian heavyweight pugilist to have been “a truly great champion” (BBC R4, 5 vi, 08:00).

In such magnanimity to the mainly-Black high school dropout and draft dodger who had joined Nation of Islam before succumbing to the Parkinsonism which marred his last thirty-two years, Trump showed himself perfectly capable of sweet reason about Muslims – in contrast with the purblind prejudice that he was widely assumed to be afflicted by the Ali-infatuated hysterics of MSM who themselves readily accepted the deceased as having been the wonder of the 20th century and a virtual saint despite his having supported complete racial segregation of Blacks and Whites and condemned as an ‘Uncle Tom’ a fellow Black boxing star who favoured race mixing.

Pressured by his managers, Ali had by the 1980s agreed to suppress his ultra-apartheid preference for Blacks and Whites to live in separate countries, and publicly adopted the incoming dogmas of multiculturalism and integration; but he always maintained that Whites would not really want integration since they would not want Blacks ‘integrating’ with their women; and he further exemplified negritude by his loudmouthed conceitedness, his rampant philandering and by endless battles with his four wives and children who, at his death, had lawyers ready to contest his will – very necessary for multimilliionaire Ali’s eldest son who lived on the breadline with his grandmother in downtown Chicago.

    Meanwhile, the cautious, bookish and kindly Lord Chancellor Michael ‘The Gofer’ Gove (the Edinburgh-born adopted son of an Aberdeen fish processor) came to the fore arguing with Jeeves-like comprehension, patience and tact as the increasingly nationalist LEAVE campaign moved into a poll lead (in the UK’s referendum about membership of EUSSR) despite MG being called on Sky TV (3 vi) – by Bengal-originated political editor Faisal Islam – “an Oxbridge Trump.”

As MG won over his studio audience – after an alarming start dismissing ‘economists’ altogether – it was evident that the Trumpian qualities of good-humoured frankness and intelligence were rather appreciated by the public when they managed to peek through the peecee shroud unfailingly provided (at taxpayer expense) by MSM.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, May 17, 2016


 Britain risked “flames” of racial and religious conflict because of a “liberal self-delusion” over the impact of mass immigration, the Black former head of HMG’s ‘equality’ watchdog Trevor Phillips (q.v.) admitted—if late in the day (Daily Telegraph, 10 v, John Bingham).

In a startling assault on decades of official multiculturalism and diversity policy, the founding chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission argued the UK was being allowed to “sleepwalk to catastrophe” by leaders too “touchy”, “smug”, “complacent” and “squeamish” to talk about race.

Drawing a direct parallel with Enoch Powell’s notorious “rivers of blood” speech, Phillips likened Britain’s politicians, media and educated elite in general to the Emperor Nero fiddling while Rome burned, unable even to recognise the “dark side of the diverse society”. “[Powell] too summoned up echoes of Rome with his reference to Virgil’s dire premonition of the River Tiber ‘foaming with much blood’,” said Mr Phillips.


 Britain’s ‘BREXIT?’ referendum got into full swing, with PM Daft Dave threatening that a LEAVE vote could end peace in Europe – i.e. precipitate World War III. In reply, LEAVE hero and Cabinet colleague Boris Johnson (‘BoJo’), as well as calling DD “dishonest” and “demented”, opined that the European Union represented a continuation of Germany’s age-old wish for empire – last manifest in the doomed efforts of Kaiser Bill and Hitler.

{Such dramatic speculations served to spare either side admitting complicity in years of low-IQ immigration and breeding, culminating in Mutti Merkel’s new millions of ‘Syrian’ rapefugees and in her already beginning WWIII with her provocations to Vlad the Impaler in the Ukraine and her siding with Turkey in the Solunni vs Shitite fight for control of Arabia.

But the dread topic of Black & Muesli immigration would surely surface as Europe’s social services were overwhelmed, as Whites had so conspicuously to behave like church mice under PeeCeee, and as competition-tolerant East Asia forged ahead economically and educationally.}

The lofty excitements of UK politicos were mirrored popularly in old-fashioned nationalism (vs the USSR’s early attempt at globalisation): the Ukraine won Eurovision with a song deploring Stalin’s evacuation of Tatars to Siberia – even though this evacuation of pro-German Mueslis had been a sensible move towards winning Russia’s Great Patriotic War (WWII).


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Wednesday, May 11, 2016


Having failed for a decade to stand up for race realism, free speech, Christianity or crime control – abandoning all these in a vain effort to compromise with PeeCee – America’s Republicans were g*bsmacked as The Donald [q.v.] advanced to make his unique blend of Muesli-contestant nationalism and socialistic job  [“jab”] creation their party’s political philosophy for the foreseeable future.

When asked by the Guardian (5 v) to describe the impact on the Republican party of Trump’s dramatic rise towards nomination, Rick Wilson, a prominent conservative strategist who worked on the presidential campaigns of both George Bushes, replied: “What Republican party? The party I grew up in is done, it’s over. As long as Donald Trump is the definition of our brand, it’s dead.”

At his victory speech in Indiana, Trump bragged that the Republican establishment spent $8m in its desperate attempt to stop him, including 60,000 negative TV ads which he called “absolutely false and disgusting”. But he added: “The people are so smart they don’t buy it. They get it.”

For their part, the Democrats—along with much of the West’s ‘political class’ – were left holding the baby of globalizing multiculturalism which had enriched the new slavers in the international statosphere but increasingly alarmed ordinary folk as its ‘principle’ of free movement of people was rapidly undermining the welfare states for which people thought they had paid with their own families primarily in mind.

All that remained was for The Donald to pull in female votes by supplying domestic assistance (e.g. from social science students, as part of compulsory practical work on their luniversity courses) and to be seen co-operating with Vlad the Impaler to bring WWIII to a swift conclusion (notably with the eradication of ISICK and hangers-on).


Can Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton? Yes he can!

Surely Donald Trump is going to lose to Hillary Clinton in a landslide? America's first female presidential nominee against a sexist pig should be no contest. Especially when she's a former Secretary of Sate and he can't pronounce Tanzania.

“Mr Trump was born for the campaign trail. It suits his egomania. He relishes feuds and thrives on controversy. He is a narcissist who loves being on stage”

At the end of all this hullabaloo America will have another Clinton in the White House and "The Donald" will crawl back to his penthouse in Trump Tower to lick his wounds. ‘Make America Great Again’ hats will soon be retro souvenirs on eBay and the Republican Party will look back on 2016 as the year it went collectively, but only temporarily, bonkers.

The bookmakers certainly think that's how it will play out. They have Mrs Clinton as odds-on favorite. So do the pollsters - they put Mrs Clinton seven percentage points ahead, which would mean a runaway victory. But not so fast. This race hasn't actually started yet, and when it does things are likely to change dramatically.

Over the course of about five months Mrs Clinton is going to be subjected to the kind of sustained attack no presidential candidate has ever had to endure.

The Democratic primary race has been, on the whole, civilised. Bernie Sanders declined to criticise Mrs Clinton over the scandal of her using a private server for emails when she was Secretary of State. In 2008, Barack Obama was less charitable when he ran against her, but there was still respect.

Mr Trump, however, is going to throw the kitchen sink at her. No blow will be too low. His campaign will be governed by the principle that mud sticks, and there is a lot of it to throw. He will dredge up every seedy detail stretching back the Bill Clinton years. Everyone remembers Monica Lewinsky. But what about Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, They are all about to become household names again.

Paula Jones, who sued Mr Clinton for sexual harassment, has already been spotted at a Trump rally. Most people have also forgotten what the Whitewater scandal was all about. Mr Trump is about to start reminding them in great detail. Dubiously sourced stories will soon start mysteriously appearing in supermarket tabloids insinuating affairs, corruption and chaos in the Clinton camp.

On the internet it will be much, much worse. Already several unrepeatable rumours are doing the rounds there. At the forefront of the effort to undermine Mrs Clinton will be Roger Stone, Mr Trump's political henchman famous for being a member of Richard Nixon's notorious Committee for the Re-election of the President (CREEP).

Mr Trump, who likes to give his opponents a moniker, has already settled on "Crooked Hillary" for Mrs Clinton. The longer the investigation into her emails goes on the more that will stick.

Then there's Benghazi. Mr Trump will hammer the message that it happened on Mrs Clinton's watch and she was "asleep when the 3am phone call came". Expect the majority of Americans with military connections, and that's a lot, to back Mr Trump.

And remember that, according to some estimates, 43 per cent of American households own a gun {so as to warn off Blacks in America’s many thinly-policed areas}. Mrs Clinton hates guns. Mr Trump loves them so much he sometimes carries one around with him. But Mrs Clinton's biggest problem may end up being herself. Senior Democrats admit she is an imperfect candidate. She readily admits to not being a natural campaigner like her husband.

Mr Trump, by contrast, was born for the campaign trail. It suits his egomania. He relishes feuds and thrives on controversy. He is a narcissist who loves being on stage. When he sees television cameras his eyes light up and his mouth delivers perfectly formed sound bites.

In a country that lives through its television sets, Mr Trump will dominate the headlines and each day there will be a new outlandish diatribe against Mrs Clinton, played over and over again. Day after day he will also appeal to working class Democrats who have lost their jobs, vowing to bring those jobs back from China and Mexico if they switch sides.

Over time that seven-point lead will start to narrow.

Much will then depend on the three televised debates where Mrs Clinton risks appearing condescending toward her far less informed opponent, something that did for Al Gore when he lost to George W Bush.

Mr Trump will also have a special card to play. At some point during the debates he will turn to Mrs Clinton and say: "You're so crooked I was able to pay you to come to my wedding."

Can Mr Trump win? Yes he can.


After years of globalizing multiculturalism had served only to enrich international slavers, voters of the West began to assert their own basic interests. In America, ordinary Whites amazed MSM by elevating The Donald to have a chance on the White House; and Democrats split along identity lines, with women backing ‘Crooked Hillary’ and the young pleading for more of the pseudo-socialism that had turned their universities into ‘safe zones’ of political correctness run by maniacs for the new religion.

In Britain, Scots voted for Scottish nationalism (or UK nationalism – making the Conservatives the main opposition in the Holyrood mini-Parliament); the Welsh voted for Welsh nationalism (even winning the iconic Rhondda Valley from Labour) or UKIP; the Northern Irish became more tribalist than ever; and London’s Muslims (12% of the city’s residents) voted in a London mayor who had condemned moderate Mueslis as ‘Uncle Toms’.

In Germany, whose crackpot leaderene Mutti Merkel had offered the country as host to European civil war, the percentage accepting Islam as part of German life fell from its 37% in 2015 to a new low of 22% (Telegraph, 5 v). Yes, the disgruntled electorates of the West – knowing since the crash of 2008 that economics was a complete mess – were falling back on their more comprehensible and certain interests.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, May 02, 2016


 The most fearsome self-contradiction of multiculchalunacy exploded in the faces of its acolytes, yielding both a Mueslie MP and star Labour ex-mayor of London suspended from the party, Labour’s 2016 candidate for the London mayoralty accused of racism, and the party itself (especially in its university branches) widely suspected of antiSemitism under the cover of antiZionism (e.g. Daily Mail, 28 iv).

Labour had long been willing to wear the mantle of holiness that involved easy condemnation of the Holocaust and of any of Labour’s  serious political opponents as ‘Nazis’; but this caper finally became a victim of its own success as the resultant mass immigration temptingly swelled the numbers of Muesli votes far beyond those of Jews, as Mueslis generally maintained their historic antipathies to female wiles, to female education, to adultery, to homosexuality, to alcohol and to Jews, and as Jews themselves soon ceased to be the underdogs that they had so affectingly appeared in 1945.

Of course, the official leftist position was that it was Zionism that was opposed, not Judaism, let alone Jewry. But two generations of convenient multiculturalism had led socialists to support the Muesli takeover of Europe that was likely to be opposed only by Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump; and their multiculturalism had got them stuck with Islamist attitudes to and proposals for Jews that were indeed those of Hitler – who had in the 1930s encouraged and facilitate the relocation of willing Jews to Palestine, as Britain had agreed with American Jewry in 1917 to boost support for American entry into the First World War. Many in MSM, in pre-Corbyn Labour and on the cowardly multiculturalized ‘right’ were likely to seize the chance of fun.

By 29th April, a fifth of Labour’s Shadow Cabinet and a sixth of Labour MPs demanded publicly that the party’s only star, ‘Red Ken’ Livingstone, be expelled – even though RKL had done nothing but allude to the Haavara Agreement between Nazis and Zionists through the 1930s which had, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, assisted the relocation of 60K Jews from Germany to Palestine.

More explosions were inevitable as holy multiculti Labourites learned that the attitudes of their belovéd Islamists towards Jews (and Christians and each other) were very far less civilized than those of Hitler. Said RKL: "How can the truth be an offence - if I had lied that would be offensive."“Everything I said was true and I will be presenting an academic book about that to the Labour Party inquiry,” he said.

The former London Mayor was referring to a book written in the 1980s by the American Marxist historian Lenni Brenner, who had noted there was collusion in the 1930s between campaigners for a Jewish homeland and the Nazis. Fanning the flames of Labour infighting, RKL said this 'history' was unknown to MPs of 2016 merely because "they don't teach it in Israeli schools".

In a further twist, he blamed his suspension on “embittered Blairites” who wanted to undermine his lifelong leftist pal Jeremy Corbyn (fourth-born champion of all underdogs – not least of Arab-Muslim Palestinians – and elected Labour leader by his desperate party in 2015).

He was strongly supported by the British left’s other star, ‘Gorgeous’ George Galloway (the only UK MP to have his argumentative skills commended by the US Senate).

Jeremy Corbyn’s director of strategy and communications, one Seamus Milne, weighed in with insistence that the foundation of the state of Israel had been a “crime”. The leftist Observer columnist Nick Cohen reckoned the “rot” of antiSemitism in Labour went deep (1 v):

"Go to any British synagogue or Jewish school and you will see police officers and volunteers guarding [Jews]. I do not want to tempt fate, but if British Jews were murdered, the leader of the Labour party would not be welcome at their memorial. The mourners would point to the exit and ask him to leave. If it is incredible that we have reached this pass, it is also intolerable. However hard the effort to overthrow it, the status quo cannot stand".

Hard indeed – to part with the millions of Muesli votes accumulated under the nice-looking banner of multiculturalism!


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 18, 2016


In increasing fulfilment of realists’ predictions, A/A pumigrant males from the 11K encamped on the border of Greece with Macedonia made a sustained effort to breach the razor-wired border fences, hurling rocks at police and returning tear gas canisters as they did so (Sunday Mail, 10 iv). The authorities escalated from stun grenades to the use of plastic bullets and water cannon, and 250 A/As were finally reported by French medics as being injured—making this the most damaging battle to date with Europe’s saintly invaders.


 Two generations of ‘rainbow nation’ stuff – about all ‘minorities’ needing to work together – met a dramatic end as the ‘revived’ Labour Party of the Yukay turned out to have got itself stuffed full of youthful anti-Semites who preferred to pull in the ever-larger numbers of ‘British’ Muslim votes – at whatever cost of losing LGBT enthusiasts and left’s own largely faithful feminists.

Meantime, in Israel, members of ‘far right’ European groups were received with open arms – attesting to recognition that  multiculturalism had become a mess – and that Jews would need every Christian help they could get against muderous Mueslis.

Personification of the European civil war which Madcap Merkel had unleashed so as to establish the age-old ambition of an oil-rich Holy Germano-Turkic Empire was achieved in London, where electoral competition for the Mayoralty of London would bring head to head Jewish scion Zac Goldsmith (Con.) and Muesli-backing ‘human rights lawyer’ Sadiq Khan (Lab.).

(Sadiq Khan had shared a platform with a man convicted of terrorism and a militant who helped to train the ringleader of the July 7 London bomb attacks, raising serious questions about his approach to Islamist extremism. Labour’s candidate for London mayor spoke at a conference in the capital in 2003 alongside Yasser al-Siri, who had been sentenced to death in Egypt over a political assassination attempt that left a young girl dead. Another speaker was Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, better known as Sajeel Shahid, a member of al-Muhajiroun, a terrorist group later banned in the UK. He ran a camp in Pakistan which trained militants to fight for the Taliban.)


Visiting the Greek isle of Lesbos to express sympathy with the hundred thousand A/A victims of mid-East civil war, general incompetence and failure to settle down under opthalmologist Basher Assad or other strongmen, the Pope was moved to invite a grand total of twelve A/As to enjoy the splendours of the Vatican. Apparently in line with new Catholic proclamations, the lucky twelve were selected not by need or merit but by the egalitarian principle of lottery.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 11, 2016


 A year after twelve of its staff were gunned down by Islamic fanatics, the brave Paris satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo came out with an editorial saying all Muslims were to some extent to blame for the horrors committed in the name of their religion (Daily Mail, 6 iv).

Equally, the magazine condemned the cowardly Western response to jihadic bloodlust, saying “....all of it is informed by some version of the same dread or fear...The dread of being treated as an Islamophobe or being called racist. Really, a kind of terror.”

Though Charlie did not identify anti-racism as merely the key component of the pseudo-egalitarian political correctness which so assisted slave-making globalization, its editorial made it the first well-known publication to break from the party line of the elite high priests of PeeCee that there was no general problem with Mohammedanism, ‘the religion of peace.’


As Führerin Merkel’s ‘solution’ to immigrant invasion problem she had created in Europe produced only a pathetic few score Mueslis agreeing to be ferried back from Greece to Turkey, the European Union’s plan to halt the migrant tide from Libya was also falling apart, with the naval operation in the Mediterranean failing to thwart traffickers and the desperate masses continuing to slip into Italy, officials told The Times (8 iv).

More than 19,000 migrants, mostly sub-Saharan Africans, had arrived in Italy from north Africa in the first three months of 2016, a huge increase on the same period in 2015. The surge raised fears in Rome that Italy would have to accommodate up to 270,000 new arrivals in 2016, particularly if Syrian refugees trapped in Turkey switched to the north African route.

    The EU’s naval operation, known as Sophia, was launched in 2015 with the aim of catching traffickers at sea with the help of a Royal Navy ship. Instead, it was spending most of its time rescuing migrants from the water, in effect making life easier for the traffickers, according to an Italian magistrate.

“The ships are patrolling very close to Libyan waters, allowing traffickers to send out unstable dinghies helmed merely by migrants because they know they will be picked up quickly,” said Carmelo Zucchero, who had prosecuted traffickers in Sicily. “We used to stop traffickers on the high seas escorting migrant boats, but we don’t see these organizers any more,” he added. “The EU is doing an important job saving lives; but if its primary mission is catching smugglers, it is not doing it — thanks to its own methods.”

    One Greek official, as angry as most of his countrymen with the A/A invasion, produced figures for the Mail (9 iv) of new arrivals to the camp on tiny Skiros island since the deportations began, and said that, for every migrant deported, at least three new arrivals were admitted after landing on beaches. ‘We sent 64 out by boat back to Turkey this week. Since then, we have had 152 new people coming in. The week before, we had 300 new arrivals. The numbers don’t add up. This whole exercise is a lot of garbage.’

    Further embarrassment for the traitorous, incompetent and authoritarian Mad Mutti was that Greek authorities had failed to persuade thousands of ‘refugees’ to leave their squalid conditions around the port of Piraeus for the relative comfort of frank detention camps where they could be prepared for shipping to Turkey (Daily Telegraph, 8 iv). Wishing to maintain appearances, the Greeks said they would wait at least a leisurely couple of weeks before using force.


Unremarked by cheerleaders for multiculti mixing, research by two Asian economists exploded the postmodern Western myth that nations should unfailingly be encouraged towards ethnic mixing.  While diversity of values was found positively associated with national levels of innovation in science and business, diversity of ethnicity had only a negative association (AmRen, 7 iv):

Bala Ramasamy and Matthew Yeung, Applied Economic Letters, February 12, 2016


Although the effect of culture on national innovation levels is well-established, previous literature assumes cultural homogeneity within a nation. In this article we analyse two aspects of diversity–ethnic and values–and their impact on national innovation output. We show that ethnic diversity or fractionalization and values diversity are distinct and while the former has a negative effect on innovation, the latter contributes positively. However, countries are bound to have both types of diversity. We find that countries that are ethnically homogenous but diverse in values orientation are the best innovators.

To which one AmRen correspondent helpfully added:

"It's FAR worse than that. Racial diversity reduces trust among the population, increases chaos and turmoil, creates disunity and inter-tribal hostility, but even more perilous than all those combined is the fact that no multicultural society in the history of mankind has existed for very long -- with most of them breaking up in bloody warfare"


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 04, 2016


 It turned out that the Anglosphere’s groupings of non-psychotic race-realistic thinkers and writers (such as American Renaissance, VDare and TakiMag) had happily been joined by ‘Alternative Right’ (alt-right), headed by Richard Spencer (AmRen, 30 iii) and making up for the demise of the once-vibrant ‘Human Biodiversity’ (hbd). Apparently the new group stressed the value of culture, tradition, hierarchy and intelligence; and it had invented the useful concept of ‘cuckservatism’ which had so enraged America’s ignoracist Republicans.


  Germany’s pumigrants had moved from being a challenge to being a problem. This was allowed to be admitted in the Guardian (1 iv, by the personally once-‘welcoming’ Konstantin Richter). “The EU has struck a complicated deal with Turkey that is meant to reduce the influx. It may or may not work. But whatever happens in the coming months, Germany’s Willkommenskultur – the belief that we should welcome refugees with open arms – has arguably come to an end

What’s more, the nation that took in more than a million people seems irredeemably changed by the experience – and not for the better. Germany is bitterly divided on the refugee question. Neighbours and families are divided. The poisonous atmosphere has been fuelled by rightwing hatemongers. But the adherents of the Willkommenskultur, in my view, are also to blame.”

Among the lesser problems posed by rapefugees were apparently educational levels of age ten, denigration of Jews, expressions of sympathy for parents only having daughters, and inability to say ‘thank you.’


 While Yankee and Britoid luvvies were beating their breasts at the ‘under-representation’ of Blacks among Oscar, Bafta and Wooftah prizewinners, it turned out that South and Central America had been swept for fourteen years by a ‘telenovela,’ Rebelde, centred on an elite private school in Mexico City and featuring an almost-all-White cast.

The soap pop sensation had been released on television in some two dozen countries (including seven in Eastern Europe) – but not in Yukay and not till 2015 in USA.


 Enthusiasts for intersexuality were cautioned by acclaimed British author Ian McEwan (Daily Mail, 2 iv). In a lecture for the Royal Institute about the history of ‘selfhood,’ McEwan rejected the notion that identity could be chosen as if from a supermarket shelf, complained of the culture of victimhood that was so often cultivated by the self-styled transgendered, and deplored free speech about such matters becoming restricted by students on American and British university campuses.

Tackling the idea that people are free to choose their identities as they wish, he claimed that humans were constrained by other things, such as biology, experiences and social norms. “I think,” he said, “there is sweeping through American campuses a kind of strange sense of victimhood and a sense of purposeful identities that we can’t actually all of us agree with.

Of course sex and race are different, but they also have a biological basis. It makes a difference whether you have an X or Y chromosome.”

His comments were dismissed by tranny spokespersons as “hurtful,” “offensive” and “dangerous” (Times, 2 iv). But his feeling that philosophies of ‘sexual fluidity’ needed  full and fair discussion was supported by the Moderator of the Church of Scotland, who came out against the proposed imposition of biological unrealism by Scotland’s First Minister who wanted ‘gender’ on birth certificates to become a matter of personal choice, allowing unrecorded and unauthenticated change of classification at any time and including an option of ‘non-binary gender’ (Daily Telegraph, 2 iv).


The Muslim-Christian clash of civilizations which PeeCee dared not admit achieved official form as mortar and artillery fire erupted in the disputed Caucasus area of Nagorno-Karabakh, killing dozens in two days of fighting (BBC, 3 iv). Wanton neglect of the need for clear separation between rivalrous ethnic groups had left the southern strip of Christian Armenia between the pincers of Sunni Turkey and Shi-ite Iran, and N-K as a Christian outpost within Shi-ite Azerbaijan.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, March 28, 2016


Though, over a generation, the race traitors of the peecee political elite and MSM had made it publicly unquestionable in America that any excess of Black criminality was the result of Whie racism, an updated survey by veteran economic analyst Edward Rubenststein (The Color of Crime, 2016 Revised Edition) made clear that stark differences continued as long maintained by Art Jensen, Phil Rushton and Jared Taylor as Black > Hispanic > White > East Asian – with cops notably failing to vent their supposed animosities against the USA’s Orientals. Steve Sailer summarized Rubinstein’s findings in Taki Magazine (23 iii) but a particular refutation of police bias was made neatly by Rubinstein himself:

"Almost without exception, the black/white and Hispanic/white arrest multiples are lower for the less serious crimes. Whatever else this difference may mean, it is strong evidence that the police are not making biased arrests. Police have broad discretion as to whether they will arrest someone for forcible touching, shoplifting, or setting off a false fire alarm. If racist police wanted to vent prejudices on non-whites, these are the crimes for which they could most easily do so. They can walk away if someone complains he was spat on, and if they are racist they can walk away if the spitter is white but make an arrest if the spitter is black. Police cannot walk away if someone is lying on the sidewalk bleeding from a knife wound"


In the aftermath of the Brussels horrors (34 killed and hundreds injured by ISICK), America’s Donald Trump was the first and only Western politician to respond practically to the Mueslie atrocity, proposing surveillance of Muslie areas and especially of mosques (Daily Mail, 22 iii). Monitoring might not be as reassuring as enabling mosques to to demonstrate their contributions to aiding victims of jihad, or as banning unkempt beards and slitty veils; or as salutary as closing one mosque for each person killed by jihadists, banning concentrations of Mueslis, banning Arabic, forbidding the import of Mueslie wives and sterilizing welfare-dependent mothers illiterate in English.

But, assuming surveillance would include communications and finances, it would be a big improvement on the fatuous waffle of peecee politicians and MSM.* DT also supported the use of waterboarding with “radical Islamic terrorists” and condemned US President Obarmy for declining to cut short his high-jinks holiday in Cuba so as to organize teams of New York cops to explain to Europeans how the policing of crime- and drugs-filled ghettoes should be done.

* An honourable exception was the usually much-admired former editor of the Daily Mirror, Piers Morgan – 23 iii. Ditto the Mail’s ‘controversial’ Katie Hopkins – 23 iii. And DT especially won the support of the London Times for surveillance of imams (24 iii). Emboldened, perhaps, DT went on to say he would not rule out dropping battlefield nukes on ISICK – thus making up for eight years of casualess on the part of Peace Nobelist Obarmy (D. Telegraph, 25 iii).

Further, DT threatened he would cut supplies of military toys to Saudi unless that kingdom got its act together to fight ISICK. He achieved the accolade of being burned in effigy by Mexicans on Easter Sunday.


As the Christian holy days of Easter (celebrated in Britain chiefly by public ‘servants’) licensed columnists to reflect on the state of the West’s run-down religion, the Telegraph’s Jemima Lewis (25 iii) was drawn to remark  the greater appeal of Christianity to women than to men – a sex difference not found in Jewry or Islam (and traditionally less in Catholicism than in Protestantism).

Plausibly, JL noted that early Christianity had opposed the ‘chauvinistic’ ways of the Roman Empire, allowing/encouraging girls to marry late or not at all and freeing them from demands by Roman fathers to abort or kill unwanted children [even up to age 35] and to have easy and cheap divorces if not outright polygamy. In short, females were to be ‘looked after’ while offering only loosely supervised faithfulness in return.

The West’s 20th century ‘welfare’ states actually beefed up this ‘protection’ of females, throwing in expensive health care throughout the grand old ages which women reached and high-sounding education for their children; and men accepted taxation costs since they were given vast sexual freedoms previously unknown in even the most pagan worlds.

Any problem? Yes: the expense was terrific and no-one – male or female – wanted the additional expense of fighting for a system the rightness or efficacy of which they could scarcely articulate. Probably it was only the collapse of socialist welfarism beneath its own burdensome excesses that would lead men to resume their provider roles – and to pester dominies for theologies and histories of Christianity to match.

At some point voting would have to correspond to contributions (‘No representation without taxation!’) – thus allowing a greater influence of intelligence in politics, as Jesus surely had in mind in his largely good-humoured challenges to Jewish legalism.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, March 20, 2016


The physicality of clashes between Syrian (etc.) pumigrants and their European hosts ratcheted up another notch as Macedonian guards took batons  to A/As who had found a way out of Greece by crossing (though others drowned in) a fast-flowing river.

Confrontations had previously involved pushing, shoving, groping, raping, robbing and arson of refugee shelters but now moved on to beatings to force pumigrants aboard buses to take them back to Greece (which had admitted them in expectation of unloading them northwards into the welcoming arms of Mad Mutti Merkel and her German idealists).

“The [Macedonian troops] hit everyone – women, children, men – and said ‘you are going back’,” said Halad al-Hassan, 32, from Raqqa, the Syrian city overrun by Islamic State militants last summer (Guardian, 16 iii). “People are very shocked, too shocked to even want to speak,” he sighed, shaking his head in disbelief. “I’ve been here in Idomeni for 27 days. It’s very bad, very cold, very unbelievable. Why does Macedonia do this? Why has Europe closed the borders?”

Dazed youngsters, blankets strewn across their shoulders against the biting cold, walked around aimlessly as charity workers – many having worked through the night – strove to cater for the estimated 2,500 people pushed back into Greece.

{As people smugglers worked tirelessly to help pumigrants with their ambitions, it could not be long before the authorities would use their guns – as should have been threatened from the beginning of the invasion. German anarchists were also reported to be stirring things up in the appalling 14K-strong ‘city’ that had grown up on the Greece-Macedonia border.}


As Russia surprised the world by a sudden withdrawal of its jet bombers from Syria, experienced Times correspondent Roger Boyes reckoned that John Kerry and Sergei Lavrov, the US and Russian foreign ministers, had sketched out a “federal” future for Syria (16 iii). It seemed that Vladimir Putin might accept the idea that the Alawite-dominated Latakia region in the west and the capital Damascus stay in Moscow-friendly hands while the Syrian Kurds in the north would be given a form of self-government.

Much to the annoyance of Turkey, the Syrian Kurds had already been promised diplomatic recognition by the Kremlin.

In the Sunni parts of Syria, meanwhile, Russia said it was ready to join the US in attacking Islamic State headquarters in Raqqa. Despite the withdrawal, Russia could strike Raqqa with long-range bombers based in its client state of Dagestan. The only problem was that Basher Assad wanted to continue with a multicultural Syria under his own control – hence him finding himself dumped by the realistic Russkies.


Just as Yukay ‘Conservatives’ made a Budget centrepiece of announcing they would produce an educational utopia by a multi-milllion-pound re-naming of schools as ‘academies’ [cf. America’s ‘charter schools’ – and with equally little ability to select pupils, to select their syllabuses or to select their own methods of discipline and expulsion], Australian researchers came forward with massive modern evidence of genetic effects on children’s performance (SBS News, 15 iii).

School results of thousands  of twins in NAPLAN tests revealed that skills in maths, reading and spelling were up to 75 per cent genetic; and genetics even had a 50 per cent impact on writing skills. In stark contrast, when looking at why children performed better or worse than their peers, the influence of teachers and schools on students was found to be only around 5 per cent.

The research has been conducted by Emeritus Professor Brian Byrne and colleagues at the Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders, and the University of New England [in New South Wales]. Byrne is a guest on this week’s episode of Insight, sharing his views on how research into twins can deepen our understanding of the general population. The research will shortly be published in full, with much of the peer review process complete. Some parts of the study have already been published.

Byrne and his colleagues were allowed access to around 3000 sets of twins and were able to look at their academic performance in literacy and numeracy NAPLAN tests in years 3, 5, 7 and 9.

The results were surprising {to brain-addled social-environmentalists – latterly including wet cuckservatives}.

Families, teachers and schools had a much more modest contribution when explaining the difference in academic performance of children in the same grade or class.

The majority of difference between students’ abilities in literacy and numeracy were instead attributable to their genetic make-up. Writing skills were the least influenced by genetics -- only about 50 per cent. Genetic influences on reading, spelling and mathematics abilities were found to be between 50 and 75 per cent.

The findings back up earlier research done in the UK.

“Genes are the things that are, for the most part, driving differences among children, and not different teachers or even different schools,” Byrne told Insight’s Jenny Brockie, during filming of the show’s feature on twins. Byrne says his findings “undermine the idea that a really, really big player in how well children are doing is teacher qualifications and a teacher’s education.”

Unsurprisingly, the UK Budget’s announcement of mass academization of schools elicited much caterwauling from correspondents to the Guardian (19 iii) and BBCR4’s ‘Any Answers’ – though mainly out of conventionally pious anxieties that the dreaded ‘privatization’ was in the offing rather than out of concern that inherited g levels required teaching to be arranged according to children’s abilities and achievements-to-date (as per TgF Chapter 4).


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, March 14, 2016


 Summoned to Oxford by ‘Rhodes Must Fall’ for a demo against vestiges of British imperialism, the half-a-million students of Britain managed to field only a pitiful 150 scruffs for the protest. Yet, despite this feebleness of support for latter-day leftism, Yukay’s prostrate-to-PeeCee academia produced not a single voice to speak in favour of Rhodes or any of the brave Brits who had brought peace and prosperity to a fifth of the world’s peoples for 200 years. The cowardice of Cambridge staff was especially noted by a Guardian correspondent (10 iii):

"I never thought I’d be ashamed of my old college at Cambridge. But the decision of Jesus College to remove the ancient bronze cockerel from the hall (Report, 9 March), following the calls from undergraduates to send it back to Africa, is both shortsighted and cowardly. The college claims to act “in loco parentis” with regard to its undergraduates, but only the most inadequate parents bow before the childish demands of their offspring. What will be next? Will the college tear down the statue of its episcopal founder from over the main gateway? After all, Bishop Alcock (1430-1500) did not ordain women, and that must annoy the youngsters, too. Why have the backbones of Oxbridge dons been removed?"


 Advancing from his proposal for a temporary ban on Muslims from coming to the USA, Republican front-runner for the White House, ‘Big Don’ Trump explained that ‘most Muslims hate us – there’s tremendous hatred.’ Though perhaps none too cognizant that Muslims hated and killed each other (along Solunni vs Shitite lines) with greater practicality than their largely fanciful dreams of exterminating Jews, Christians, Hindus and Buddhists.

Trump came closer than any other public figure to recognizing that the West was being invaded – its liberalism, geniality, prosperity and need for slave labour and socialist votes having sucked in the fighting-age men of A/A nations where romance was unavailable, culture a no-no and women confined largely to having babies till they dropped.

Wisely, ‘The Donald’ declined to commit himself to any more particular course of action than ‘finding out what was going on.’ But he was clear that the West’s 21st–century response to revived and oil-enriched mediaeval Islam needed beefing up. "I'll work on it with the generals," he said (CNN, 11 iii), "We have to play the game at a much tougher level than we're playing it now."


As millions of Germans prepared to vote in local elections, it turned out that the leader of the AfD (‘Alternative for Germany’) party – for which some 20% were expected to vote – had, after a first degree in chemistry from the University of Reading, got a doctorate from the highly prestigious University of Göttingen (founded by Britain’s Hanoverian monarch, King George II, in 1734), making her the West’s most intellectual nationalist leader.

The boyish Frauke Petry, 41 and a mother of four, had also been the first politician to advocate the obvious policy of using speeches and guns to deter unwanted A/A pumigrants/rapefugees. FP had also proved a most successful businesswoman, winning her country's Order of Merit for her innovative work.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, March 07, 2016


As the ‘Battle for Britain’ [re the UK’s future degree of association with the EUSSR] began, with its emotional focus being on the tidal wave of low-IQ immigration, slavery, squalor, illiteracy and welfare dependency that had been unleashed on the war-‘winning’ but bankrupt country by its short-term-thinking politicians, it turned out that the key question of how to justify free international trade without justifying free international movement of people had been answered in AmRen, 7 vi 2013.

Reviewing Ed West’s The Diversity Illusion, Tony Bain had pointed out that lax importation of Chinese computers could be easily undone by obsolescence, sale or destruction, no such remedies could be countenanced in the case of Chinamen  -- nor, Bain might have added, of their inevitable families.


  As peecee students of Jesus College, Cambridge, resolved to dissociate from ‘British imperialism’ by returning to Nigeria a 13th-century bronze cockerel taken from that country’s Benin empire in 1897, a Guardian correspondent gave some faxalife [22 ii].

"I think its perfectly acceptable to repatriate the students to Nigeria, if they dislike living in a hateful, colonial Empire that looks down at them and thinks they are less worthy than others; but many believe that the old rulers of the city of Benin were a rapacious and greedy bunch, that frequently murdered visiting traders and most likely stole the cockerel from some poor victim, who was tortured, imprisoned and eventually murdered by the rulers of Benin, a nasty, evil, and rapacious group, not known for honesty, integrity or even-handed dealing"

Yes, the bronzes had been seized in response to Benin’s killing of twelve British traders. Scores were sold to museums around the world, which kept them more safe and more visible than would ever have happened in mega-corrupt Nigeria. Benin had been a keen participant in the African slave trade, selling some 3K Blacks annually.


  The BBC’s star programme for the thinking man, Start the Week, gave top billing to pop psychocackler Oliver James to plug his book Not in Your Genes which rejoiced in the failure of 21st-century researchers to find any single genes having much effect on intelligence or personality [R4, 29 ii, chairperson Mary Ann Bighead]. In keeping with the loony Labour agenda of the 1980s, James took his jubilant 100% environmentalism to mandate the closure of all public [in UK, =private] schools so as to give expression to his egalitarianism.

[More likely, these schools would simply relocate to Belgium – where Brussels would happily provide a new Oxbridge to take the new Eton’s products.]

 Thankfully new-boy-on-the-psychogenetic-block Professor Marcus Munafo [U. Bristol] was on hand to explain to James that human psychological differences involved many genes, each of small effect – as had been recognized by Cyril Burt, Hans Eysenck and Arthur Jensen in the 1960s.


 As further scores of thousands of A/A pumigrants headed through the Balkans towards Mad Mutti Merkel’s promised welcome in idealistic Germany, even the Guardian found most of its correspondents rejecting its benevolence about the invasion and warning of troubles to come [1 iii, 2 iii].

"In my opinion, The Guardian is dialing this whole thing down... shutting down comments prematurely, or not opening them up at all - genuine news items not covered or mentioned. I think the policy seems to be don't report it, don't discuss it and it will all go away. Or to put it another way, Tony Blair's approach to creating a multicultural society - once they're in it'll be a fait accompli.

However, I don't think this issue is going to play out like that at all... I fear it will turn violent and I think it's an obligation on the part of the 'progressives' to acknowledge their hand in this. This is what they advocated. The warnings were and are clearly visible. And still they proceed. And the Guardian editorial line is fully behind it. If this turns ugly, in my opinion, they will simply slink off into the shadows and go quiet, like they had nothing to do it. But they are very very much front and centre

We see heroic young champions of freedom, fighting to bring down the oppressive rule of law.

For far too long, the countries of Europe have defended their borders and the security of their sovereign nations, even in times of war.

Now, in the new spirit of Schengen, and the heady cloud of “EU Shared Values”, these young warriors from the East are helping us to overcome this grim state of boring stability.

Saint Angela’s spiritual light has entered our souls, and we are embracing openness and welcoming all.

The future is a sunny plane of sweet harmony into which some of these nice young men will bring us the benefits of the culture of the worlds they have left behind.

The change will sometimes be explosive.

Embrace the spirit. Stay IN.

I see a violent mob, unable and unwilling to control themselves, taking up any object that can be used to force their way in a country that has neither invited nor needed them, with the complete disregard of any law of that country. And it is deeply disappointing is that this alliance of the illegal migrants and their human traffickers has found a willing accomplice in the western liberal press, as seen in the lionizing style of this and many other articles.

It simply leaves me speechless that knowing what culture, religious background and social customs they come from the liberals would even consider supporting them, thus promoting the spreading of religious hatred and intolerance, tribalism and woman explitation and subjugation.


 The cowardly cancellation by the London School of Economic of a talk that drew attention to the excessive numbers of delinquent children born to ‘welfare’ recipients was deplored, and the talk summarized by columnist Jenni Russell in the Times [3 iii]. Correspondents – e.g. below -- largely agreed with the shut-down speaker, neurobiologist Adam Perkins [King’s College London].

"The biggest challenge facing our country is the entrenched belief that it is every person's right to have as many children as they wish and the state must fund them. The extent of this entrenchment is demonstrated by the reaction to this research.

The liberal educated elite has created and cultivated an often poorly educated, anti-social and wilfully unemployed under-class with a keen sense of entitlement. The problem is that the elite's argument in support of the status quo is an apparently sound, and they believe, totemic one: the children are innocent and should not be punished for the poor choices of the parents.

Sadly, the savvy parents understand this moral obelisk and have worked out that for Western liberalism to eviscerate it would be to plunge a dagger into the heart of its own core philosophy. This argument cannot be won on moral grounds.

The irony is that it will be a fiscal economic argument that trumps this seemingly unassailable moral position. The deficit will save our society because soon we will be forced to accept that we simply can't afford it any more.

The liberals will be content because the economists will tell them they were morally right before throwing the system out of the sinking balloon. It turns out we cannot afford our high ideals. ‘Twas ever thus.....


Despite some polite lamentation over the failure of Zimbabwean student to get the statue of Cecil Rhodes removed from Oxford High Street, and some expressions of resolve to ‘think seriously’ about Britain’s imperial history, even some Guardian correspondents could be found expatiating on the Empire’s success – at least in comparison with the expansionist efforts of other countries [4 iii].

"I am not ashamed of our past, it is the present that shames me, and this supposed liberal need for atone for the supposed sins of our predecessors.

Let’s be clear, those people lived hard lives, much harder than many of the people they supposedly oppressed. They got off their backsides and explored the World. For the liberals of this World pontificating from the comforts of their arm chair, I would love to see them manage a day on a ship (200 years ago), never mind the years at a time that great men like Cook did.

They were industrious, hard working, and great innovators. They seized the opportunities that were available to them, and didn't lie idle, spreading their industry across the World. While not everything they did was PC and would meet the sensibilities of today, they did largely improve those countries which they went into.

So no we shouldn't be apologising, none more so than modern day residents of Italy should apologise for the Romans being the most advanced people of their age. Nor should we be giving more money/ scholarships to moaning students from Zimbabwe, a nation that was a bread basket prior to their independence from the UK, and would now face starvation without international aid.

No, we should be more confident and tell them to go back and study in their home country if they do not like our history."


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, February 23, 2016


The officerette for LGBTs at NUS [National Union of Stupids....] demanded veteran yag campaigner Peter Tatchell should not be allowed to address students at the University of Canterbury – saying she would withdraw her own services if he did so [Observer, 14 ii]. Tatchell had offended lezzies by backing a Northern Ireland bakery which had declined to produce a wedding cake bearing a message favouring gay marriage. Tatchell thus joined star feminoid Germaine Greer as a star ‘progressive’ ostracized by students for favouring free speech.

    A London correspondent writes, “Poor old Tatchell. Having been religiously peecee all his life, he finds himself suffering the fate of of all people who become completely captured by an ideology -- they are eventually left behind by the following generations of disciples who become ever more extreme to show they are the truest of believers.”


  Cambridge University provided a riposte to femilezzie puritanism as some twenty of its gals paraded their wares before an enthusiastic audience of 1K in the city’s Corn Exchange. Notable among the young beauties was Pippa Bull, 20 [centre], an art history undergrad who hailed from Stephen Hawking’s college, Gonville and Caius, which had hosted the CRB vs Darkest Howe debate in 1997. After acclaimed topless performances, Pippa moved on to modelling bondage gear [Sunday Mail, 14 ii].


 The lines of pan-German civil war began to be publicly drawn as Austria declared itself fed up with the A/A invasion which Führerin Merkel’s idealism had unleashed. Austria demanded Macedonia ‘completely stop’ the flow of migrants across its border from Greece after saying it had nearly reached its ‘maximum’ intake [Daily Mail, 12 ii]. Macedonia had erected metal fencing topped with razor wire along the border at the main crossing point from Greece for migrants coming through the Balkan peninsula en route to western Europe. Austria, which received 90,000 asylum requests in 2015, had set a limit of less than half that number for 2016.

Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz had urged Macedonia to halt the influx and warned that Vienna would soon have to follow suit and block refugees on its own frontiers. Speaking on a visit to the Macedonian capital, Skopje, Mr Kurz said: ‘Most probably in the coming months our maximum number will be reached, so Austria will have to stop the migrants at its own border. Macedonia must be ready to completely stop the entry of migrants on its borders.’

By contrast, Berlin continued to demand that A/A invaders be given free passage through Macedonia – and for that matter Bulgaria and Austria so the rapefugees and jiheadists could reach Germany’s Promised Land. In response, Austria said it would henceforth entertain only 80 asylum applications daily [though there was already a queue of ‘Syrians’ waiting in Slovenia] and allow only 3,120 daily to transit through Austria to Germany – both in defiance of ‘human rights’ emanating from Brussels and Strasbourg [Guardian, 19 ii]. [Just why UK PM Daft Dave did not similarly just defy the Eurocracy in his alleged ‘battle for Britain’ was unclear.]


 The ideals of passable respect for all races and religions – drummed into the West by a generation of vicious peecee ‘liberal-leftists – seemed to have had limited influence on the Oxford University Labour Club, where the chairman resigned in protest against many members “having problems with Jews” [sometimes calling them “filthy Zionists”] and where the Oxford Jewish Society had gleaned evidence for eight charges of anti-Semitism with which it persuaded HMG to institute an immediate inquiry into the naughtiness [which was specially prevalent among Corbynistas] [D.Telegraph, 18 ii].


Called “unChristian” by the Pope for wanting a fence to keep Mexican pumigrants out of America and a ban on new Muesli arrivals, Presidential hopeful Donald Trump shot back that the pontiff was a “disgrace” who should be on his knees praying for a Trump victory to protect the West and his faith [D.Mail, 19 ii].

At a stroke The Donald thus swept past the lily-livered supplicants ooops diners of Brussels, the pathetic ‘academics’ of the LSE who acquiesced in student demands for cancellation of a lecture spelling out the heritable aggression and criminality of some British welfare dependents, and perhaps even Vladimir Putin himself – who had failed to spell out his game plan of backing relatively White Shitites against the darker, more authoritarian and hysterical Arab Solunnis. Trump went on to win the Republican nomination in South Carolina, forcing Latino-loving Jeb Bush to withdraw from the US Presidential race.


 A handy introduction to the last fifty years of the psychometric study of group differences in race and sex was provided in an account of his own involvement in it by star researcher and eugenicist Emeritus  Professor Richard Lynn [AmRen, 19 ii].

Admittedly, Lynn’s concern with the psychology, heritability and educational implications of g  differences was slight; and his attention to the pretty small superiorities of East Asians [over Whites] and of men [over women – a difference which may be just in spatial ability] rather squeezed out the dismally low IQs of sub-Saharan Blacks and thus stopped Lynn seeing that the left’s hostility to g and ‘racism’ occurs largely because of the frustrating failure of its fifty years of multi-trillion-dollar taxpayer-funded efforts to show the slightest achievement for its beloved social environmentalism.

But his reluctance to think that the West might actually overthrow environmentalism as it faced down mounting invasion by low-IQ hordes was at least paired with optimism that the Chinese – despite their current shameful addiction to Western universities [aka nurseries, with their ‘safe places’ and political correctness] – might maintain a semblance of civilization; and his visual aids of selected colleagues were excellent.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.