Monday, December 15, 2014


Faced with thousands of A/As in Calais, waiting to hide in lorries bound for paradise Britain, France ‘demanded’ the EUSSR (extensively funded by UK taxpayers) pay £3M to convert a kiddies’ playground next to the port into a resource that would serve 700 meals daily, facetube connections and soft-loo-papered toilet facilities to help A/As as they waited for their chances to reach the land of hope and welfare which other EU countries provided only for subjects who had already made some contribution to their systems (Mail on Sunday, 7 xii, ‘Holiday camp for migrants’).

{As I recently explained to Mrs Margaret Gilmore, our ‘local’ East Edinburgh Labour MP – no-one in south Edinburgh (home to ex-Sir Fred the Shred) thinks they live in grotty east Edinburgh – ‘the Churchill/Beveridge/Attlee welfare state has reached the end of its natural life.’}

{I am known personally to three members of the House of Lords, and currently to four MPs (though anti-euro Labour deviant Austin Mitchell and ex-PM ‘saviour of the world’ Gordon Brown are about to retire) and constitutionalist guru Vernon Bogdanor (Oxford tutor of PM DD). – A fat lot of good it has done me!... Welfarism in Britain long ago replaced the Church of England and the male-headed family which the pathetic cheap-labour-seeking lesbianizing Church had failed to back.}


 After Claridge’s Hotel, in Mayfair, politely suggested a breastfeeding mudder should be discreet, and supplied a large napkin to that end, forty ugly fat-slag lesbos turned up (surely without husbandly advice) to parade their engorged mammaries, useless hairdos, pudgy fingers, splayed legs [contrary to Doctor Johnson’s advice] and greedy welfare-dependent sprogs (Mail on Sunday, 7 xii).

Yes, Britoid wymmin, having quite failed to resist the oppression – and, indeed, stoning – of their sisters under Islam were happy enough to make a nuisance of themselves to the kindly money-spinners of the West. (Claridge’s advised them they could always go to the Ritz.) A 2010 ‘Equality Act’ had made it unlawful for a business to discriminate against a breastfeeding woman. {So a man could half-undress and point to his own genitalia with similar impunity?...}

    The Speccie’s Melissa Kite put it well (6 xii):

"David Cameron and Justine Roberts of Mumsnet chorused tritely that Mr Farage was wrong to say anything at all about breastfeeding ever, because it was all perfectly ‘natural’. And so it is. But a whole range of bodily functions are natural. It doesn’t mean we should get to do them in the middle of Claridges.

The mother in question was ‘completely shocked and appalled.’ She knew the terms of the Equality Act. Oh yes. She said she didn’t understand why as a society we were offended by breastfeeding. Here’s the thing. We are not offended. What is being questioned, I think, is the putting on display of an act of intimacy."


A ‘humanitarian’ ‘photojournalist’ of British origin, but who had sacrificed his nationality to get an American passport, was beheaded – along with a similarly daft White South African – as he set about his self-chosen mission of detailing the poverty and squalour resulting for Arabs from fifty years of internecine Muesli fighting in Yemen – hardship already well known to any newspaper reader in the West, though not apparently to the yag-looking said photojournalist.


That Europe’s ancient left-right division – under which all parties became leftist and Mueslimified for lack of support from the lesbianized church and peecee-undermined cops – was being superseded by the division between tough-minded realists and tender-minded idealists was indicated as Europe’s ‘far right’ parties began to link up with Vladimir Putin’s effort to defend the White race.

In Paris, the Front Nationale confirmed that it had taken a whopping €9.4m (£7.4m) loan from the First Czech Russian bank in Moscow (Guardian, 9 xii). This loan was logical enough. The FN’s leader, Marine Le Pen, made no secret of her admiration for Putin; her party had links to senior Kremlin figures including Dmitry Rogozin, now Russia’s deputy prime minister, who in 2005 ran an anti-immigrant campaign under the slogan “Clean Up Moscow’s Trash”.

Le Pen defended her decision to take the Kremlin money, complaining that she had been refused access to capital in France: “What is scandalous here is that the French banks are not lending.” She also denied reports by the news website Mediapart, which broke the story, that the €9.4m was merely the first instalment of a bigger €40m loan.

The Russian money would fuel Marine Le Pen’s run for the French presidency in two years’ time. Nobody expected her to win, but the FN topped the polls in May’s European elections, winning an unprecedented 25% of the vote; Le Pen’s 25 new MEPs already formed a pro-Russian bloc inside the European parliament.


The moronic dream of Britain’s LibLabCons that every child could become, well, a sociologist, met its come-uppance as Britain had to hire bricklayers from Spain and Portugal and sandwichmakers from Hungary, on ten times the wages they could get in their homelands, to make up for Britain’s idealistic failure to train its schoolkids in skills which they could master (D.Mail, 9 xii).

An agency based in Warsaw claimed one of its firms, run by Conservative peer Lord Wolfson, had already taken on 7,000 Poles. UK Work and Pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith (who had an incomprehensible scheme for solving the problem) said the UK benefits system encouraged skills shortages by allowing British people to live comfortably without work.


 The peecee West, which had ostracized star geneticist James Watson for ‘racism’, received a resounding kick in the teeth as Watson’s despairing sale of his Nobel medal to fund more research was met by Russia’s richest man, mining tycoon and Apple investor Alisher Usmanov (also owner of London’s top football team, Arsenal), forking out $4M to Watson and then promptly giving him his medal back (Washington Post, 10 xii).

Russian businessman Alisher Usmanov says he was "distressed" that U.S. scientist James Watson had felt forced to sell his Nobel Prize gold medal

 "In my opinion, a situation in which an outstanding scientist has to sell a medal recognizing his achievements is unacceptable,” Usmanov said in a statement. “James Watson is one of the greatest biologists in the history of mankind and his award for the discovery of DNA structure must belong to him."

Mr Usmanov was worth $16B and believed that treatment of his father’s cancer had been assisted by Watson & Crick’s DNA discovery.

The Russian billionaire was well-known as a patron of the arts. One of his recent purchases at Sotheby’s was an art collection of the renowned Russian musicians Mstislav Rostropovich and Galina Vishnevskaya. In 2007, he bought it for $112M and gratuitously passed it to the Russian government. The unique collection is currently exhibited in the Konstantinov Palace in Saint Petersburg (Tass, 9 xii).

James Watson, 86, had previously endorsed the abortion of homosexual foetuses and concurred with conventional wisdom that darker-skinned people tended to have stronger sex drive; he also said he would have aborted his own son if he had been able to foretell the boy’s becoming – as he did -- schizophrenic.

In 2014 he {like this blog, q.v.} spoke favourably of Nicholas Wade’s A Troublesome Inheritance which frankly and engagingly acknowledged quite a number of evolutionarily based race differences.

    The left’s main line remained to denigrate Watson for his views on topics on which he was not ‘expert.’ But one Guardian correspondent pointed out (10 xii):

"Incidentally, is it morally flawed if an expert in the field of intelligence holds "racist" views on intelligence's distribution? I'm thinking particularly of Arthur Jensen, see some of his research here


 Inspired by the outdated welfarist and Nobel-pacifist mulatto Obarmy, America – helped by its politicos taking a prolonged Halloween-Thanksgiving-Christmas-Hogmanay break – embarked on a fulsome denigration of its own intelligence operatives who had tried – using non-scarring quasi-torture – to solve the riddles of 9/11.

Sparing no expense, a 500-page gummint-funded document from Senatorial busybodies provided lurid detail of CIA waterboarding, rectal feeding, prolonged nudity, shackling and sleep deprivation (which sadly got little nearer solving such questions as why three unannounced planes could fly undetected and unhindered to New York and Washington).  MSM agreed with Obarmy to denounce the country’s servants for a modest suspension of Muesli ‘uman rights.

Just why Mueslis were entitled to any rights at all when they were invaders whose shock troops – seldom criticized and never ostracized by imams -- granted no rights to Westerners (apart from mercifully quick beheadings) as a mystery (except for White politicos having got stuck with the peecee gimmicks on which they had relied for Muesli votes).

The Mail responded to America’s self-torture with photos of a yag being thrown off a building by Isis in northern Iraq – if not killed thereby, he would have been stoned to death in accordance with Koranic injunctions.}


 That the pimping of girls was no unique speciality of capitalist Whites was revealed by Africanseer’s late-arriving 5 vi 2012 report that scores of passably nubile Chinese girls had been imported to Nigeria for the delectation (costing $2.5K per night) of Black bigwigs.

Girls were bribed in the usual way with promises of jobs as secretaries etc. They were specially popular with Black males because of their tight vaginas – those of Black women having been unduly expanded and left unable to grip despite the use of alum stones to dry them out.


Having failed to persuade people that there were no race or sex differences, PeeCee turned its tyranny to new targets, condemning a Lady Jenkin, a health expert famed for her liberalism and moderation, who had dared to suggest that Britain’s ‘poor’ (well known for their addiction to 40p ciggies, stinky popcorn and Sky Sports licenses for their widescreen TVs) sadly lacked cooking skills and could do well to make porridge (normally costed at 4p per bowl) rather than tire themselves out visiting ‘food banks’ for past-sell-by-date tins of asparagus (D.Mail, 10 xii).

Detected in her ‘error’, Lady J dutifully grovelled to the loony tyrants who sought new worlds to conquer – thus having her cowardice hand Ukip another few hundred thousand votes. {The inability of what was left of Britain’s elite to speak freely – or even to speak the truth – would surely prove the end of these gutless peecee-indoctrinated swine who were almost as comical as PeeCee itself.}

    The Mail’s Quentin Letts, after reviewing some of the most egregious cases of PeeCee’s recent bullying, concluded:

"I could mention others: Tory MP Patrick Mercer for daring to say he had known some soldiers from ethnic minorities who were thick; Lord Young for saying we were comparatively well-off, despite austerity cuts; Andy Street, head of the department store John Lewis, for some jovial remarks about France being ‘sclerotic, hopeless and downbeat’, and many more. All were making perfectly justifiable remarks. Yet all swung on the gallows of the rolling-news cycle.

    The story by Hans Christian Andersen of the little boy who said the king was starkers is, at its root, a story about power and self-blinding loyalty. No ruler and no ruling caste is served well by people who chillingly try to suppress the truth. It is a fable that the false-moralising, shroud-waving, intolerant elite of modern Britain -- so quick to take politically-motivated offence on behalf of an entirely unfazed and unimpressed populus -- would do well to heed."


In an astonishing exercise of his smooth Etonian and Oxford gifts, PM DD popped down to Turkey to ask Dictator Doggin to prevent ‘British’ Mueslis (who should never have been hosted, let alone let loose by Britain) returning from their treacherous service to ‘Isis’ to kill as many British cops and off-duty soldiers as they could.

In exchange, DD would back Turkey for membership of the EUSSR, making it the biggest EU country and allowing it to export its millions of Mueslis, making a final mockery of DD’s stated objective of controlling third-world immigration to the UK. Was DD certifiable – as suggested by some Speccie correspondents (10 xii)?


 As Germany pursued its long-held ambition of consolidating its ‘zone of influence’ to its east, having the people of south-east Ukraine shivering in their cellars as they were bombarded at once by Berlin-backed and Moscow-backed forces, the Mail’s Peter Hitchens, a reluctant but realistic Germanophile, explained (10 xii) that the Ukraine was a corrupt, lawless and bankrupt – as well as vast – pseudo-state and thus ripe for the embrace of the EUSSR.

{Sadly, even the ‘right-wing’ PH could not appreciate that considerations of language and nationality were bound to tear the Ukraine apart in response to the EUSSR’s wanting to resume the Cold War with Russia – and indeed turn it hot.}


Britain’s time-wasting educational inspectors (of ‘Ofsted’ – short for ‘Office armchair instead of Education’....) admitted that two thirds of “bright” kids did not fulfil their potential because of boring lessons for dumbos and bad behaviour at Britain’s hopeless ‘comprehensive schools’ (D.Mail, 11 xii). Just how ‘brightness’ was measured could not be mentioned by Ofsted....


 An attempt to blast a top Ukip official as a ‘sex pest’ backfired as the accuser, a Mrs Bolter (a scarcely inexperienced mother of five, once Natasha Ahmed, currently divorced), turned out to have lied about her age (she was 39, not 35), her ‘top Oxford degree in PPE’ (she had never attended OU, said the university), her Oxford college (which she called Wadam instead of the more usual Sodom ooops Wadham), her ‘teacher training,’ her being thrown out of Labour for not paying her subs, and her flirtation with Mr Bird (which continued for months after the date which she later chose as revealing he was a political rapist – for Ukip certainly wanted a few good-looking female candidates who were the children of immigrants) (D.Mail, 11 xii).


 British politics (in which the elected parliamentarians had been sent on prolonged holiday as their hand-to-mouth leaders prepared themselves for re-election – which they would not get, following their years of multiculti madness and failure to impose English, debating, financial probity and voting on ‘Europe’) were briefly enlivened as the country’s officially top weekly telly discussion programme, ‘Question Time,’ chairpersoned by the ever-more-useless and peecee David Dimblebore, 94, managed to stage – in the safety of civilized grammar-schooled Canterbury -- something of a confrontation between the equally ignorant ‘right-wing’ ‘Poundshop Powell,’* beer-swilling Ukip leader Nigel Garage and the ‘left-wing’ multi-millionaire druggie, sex maniac and ‘comedian,’ ‘Chest-haired No-brain,’ Russell Brand [no relation] (Guardian, 13 xii).

These equally ‘anti-racist’ pop-populist performers managed to get members of the audience screaming at each other, thus disguising the fact that neither ‘politician’ could either see or seize the reasonable common ground of recruiting unemployed Blecks and Peks into a passably-funded Humanitarian Task Force for the A/A World that would do tremendous good and have fun suicide-bombing AlQueerdo, Eyesore and Yoko Haram before dying off.


 Britain’s passably popular ‘racist’ party had itself a Merry Little Christmas celebrating the decision by ‘Dirty’ Richard Desmond to give it £300K and to bring out his newspapers (Daily Express, Daily Porn, Weekly Porn etc) in favour of the OAP ooops Senior Citizen Party at the UK’s imminent 2015 (chaotic) General Election.

Further adding to Ukip’s credibility, the Daily Telegraph ‘revealed’ that cheery-chappy Ukip leader Nige Garage had twice corresponded with the only near-realist of British politics, the scholarly Enoch Powell – though Enoch had disdained the advance as he had by the 1980s committed himself to the Ulster Unonists, not realizing that they too (like the ‘Tories’) would betray him in return for dosh and gummint jobs from Revs Clinton and Blair.

* For genius (if IQ-ignorant) Enoch, see


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, December 08, 2014


 As Germany slapped down any attempt by Britain to control the inflow of gypsies to London (Germany already had its own ‘tented cities’ of Romanian slave labourers and did not want want more) and the UK’s feckless debt-increasing Chancellor showered the National Elf ‘Service’ with a further £25B for its overheated, chattering, tea-drinking lesbian nurses, at least the Mail (though bizarrely wanting to give Daft Dave “one more chance” – unlike most of its increasingly Ukip-backing readers) seemed to turn a crucial corner by acknowledging {together at last with this blog} that Britain’s non-contributory, irresponsible and fraudulent ‘welfare state’ (which had managed to destroy marriage, the only known producer of happiness and child health) would have to go (30 xi):

"For years our leaders have tried to avoid any fundamental consideration of our relationship with the European Union, or of our colossal, unaffordable and badly targeted welfare system.Now both require solutions, soon. Our benefits system, more or less unique in the EU, does not require contributions before it pays. Such a system is unsustainable in an age of open borders. Meanwhile, the migration issue has alerted millions, previously indifferent, to just how much this country is subject to EU laws over which we have little control."


In a large-scale study of nature vs nurture, Florida State University’s Kevin Beaver {an honourable successor to hereditarian luminary professor Glayde Whitney} found IQ impervious to parental efforts (Student Science, 24 xi, ‘IQ is in the genes’):

"....the team pored over information from a study of more than 15,000 U.S. middle- and high-school students. It’s called the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

    Starting in the 1994-to-1995 school year, researchers had asked students a series of questions. For instance: How warm and loving are your parents? How much do you talk with them? How close do you feel to your parents? How much do you think they care about you? Students also were given a list of 10 activities. Then the questionnaire asked how many of those activities students had done with their parents in the previous week.

Did they play sports together? Go shopping? Talk with each other over dinner? Watch a movie together? Students also answered questions about how permissive their parents were. For example, did their parents let them choose their own friends, choose what to watch on TV or choose for themselves when to go to bed?

    The researchers then gave the students a test to gauge their IQ. Called a Picture Vocabulary Test, it asked the students to link words and images. Scores on this test have been linked repeatedly to IQ. Later in life, between the ages of 18 and 26, these people were tested again.

    Beaver’s group was especially interested in results from a group of about 220 students who had been adopted. The parents who raised them had not passed on any genes to them. So if there was a link between the students’ IQs and the way their parents raised them, the researchers should see it most clearly in the adopted students’ scores. But no such link emerged. Whether students reported their parents cared about them and did things with them — or reported that they did not — it had no impact on the their IQ. This means a person’s IQ is largely the result of the genes we inherit from our biological parents.


 Defying the century-long labours of Western Jews to promote multiculturalism and most other superficially idealistic causes, the Israeli Cabinet voted to legislate their country as essentially Jewish (D.Telegraph, 25 xi).  A bill approved in a bitterly divisive cabinet meeting would define Israel as "the nation-state of the Jewish people", enshrine Jewish law as the basis of the legal system and relegate Arabic from its current status as an official language. (Arabs were 20% of Israel’s population.) Arguments promptly broke out among top Jews; and Obarmy’s America said it would not like such realism.

{But if the USA withdrew military support from the world’s most successful mainly-Western state, Jews could always relocate to the empty desert of the Highlands of Scotland, from which they would provide a healthy counterbalance to the socialist welfare-seekers of Glasgow and Dundee.}


 Having converted themselves from agents of free speech, free inquiry and truth telling into money-grubbing bureaucracies obsessed with milking ‘research’ monies (for recycled ‘results’) out of the state quangos, Britain’s ‘universities’ found themselves spotted in their kindred strategy of dishing out marks for money to their undergrads. Universities found themselves accused of lowering standards after it was claimed students were gaining degrees despite skipping lectures and failing to do any private study.

A report from Which?, the prestigious consumer group, raised serious concerns over the value of higher education courses following the imposition of £9,000 annual tuition fees. The study, which was based on a series of large-scale surveys of students and recent graduates, found average workloads of under 30 hours a week – 25% less than the recommended level set in national guidelines (D.Telegraph, 23 xi). Fees for 3-yr degrees at most English universities had risen to £27K in 2014 – lunis seldom charging less than HMG’s prescribed maximum, allegedly ‘for fear of being thought to supply inferior education.’


Although the Wallabys could not manage to beat England at rugby (their impressively fast backs could not match the discipline and power of the English scrum), the Australian government -- effectively restoring the White Australia policy that had once nurtured the continent’s success despite abject conditions across all but its southern coastal regions -- had apparently been doing a good job of keeping out chancers from Afghooniland, Buggurma and kindred hellholes (Guardian, 1 xii):

"The government says its self-proclaimed “hardline” policies against boat arrivals are based on a humanitarian rationale, designed to stop drownings at sea, to “break the people smugglers’ business model”, and to protect Australia from “threats to its national security”. But more than 90% of those arriving by boat are found to be genuine refugees, requiring Australia’s protection. And their numbers – save for a significant spike in 2012 and 2013 – have generally been fewer than 1% of Australia’s total migrant intake.

    However, the policy on its most fundamental level is successful. Boats are no longer coming.

    Australia is one of only five jurisdictions in the world known to forcibly push asylum-seekers’ boats back to sea. Those that reach Australia are taken out of the country, held in prison-like camps in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, where instances of self-harm, disease and violent physical and sexual assault are common. The average length of detention is 426 days. Australia also incarcerates asylum-seeker children without charge. Currently, more than 600 are in detention."


As London’s shops mimicked the American tradition of stimulating trade three weeks before Christmas by offering a small number of grossly underpriced goods, scenes of wrestling, fighting, scratching and biting among jam-packed ‘shoppers’ were broadcast on TV. Although MSM generally and the BBC in particular declined to refer to the racial origins of the horrible scenes of greed (occurring even on Oxford Street), the Mail did a little better (1 xii, Peter McKay):

"....A bewildered old lady, asked what she thought, told the TV reporter she’d seen nothing like it, adding: ‘But I’m from Aberdeen.’

    I’m sure it’s not polite to say so, but it seemed to me only about one in ten in the seething tide were recognisably of Anglo-Saxon stock."


Despite years of yowling by feminoids (to the effect that all sex involving a male was rape), it turned out that Britain had kept its prosecution rate low (even then often failing to convince juries that sex was rape), and had managed twenty convictions annually of lying bitch ‘victims’ who were charged not as minor offenders but as criminals who ‘perverted the course of justice’ and deserved prison stretches.

One giggly blonde rape accuser, surnamed ‘de Freitas’ and doubtless egged on by bearded lesbians, had committed suicide rather than face trial for her perjury. Mesmerized American female lawyers and professors declared themselves shocked at British insistence on truth-telling before the law – apparently an exception in even the Western world (Guardian, 1 xii).


 The extent to which England’s skules and TV-bound bobbies had replaced the church and the family as agents of morality was declared as ‘a Bristol headteacher’ (name, age, sex and race concealed) was prepared to tell the Guardian that ‘services’ were “heaving” with petty and ancient accusations of ‘child abuse’ – not least from teenies who had facetubed nude photos of themselves to boyfriends who, on becoming ex-, duly distributed the pictures more widely.

Accusations of ‘looking’ – at girls or TV images of them – poured in and had to be seen to alarm and alert teachers. Of course, hanky-panky was not the least of the system’s self-chosen ‘problems’ (2 xii):

"One of the greatest strains on us now in school is a breakdown in race relations. Some parts of Bristol are very multicultural, but other areas – like mine – are steadfastly white and working class. There are EDL flags in windows. Racist language is common, along with sexism and homophobia. We are on a constant crusade to develop inclusivity and tolerance and to combat ingrained rage.

    Nearly 40% of our families have neither parent working; 15% have never worked; we have twice as many children on free school meals as those who pay. Most of our children have never been into the centre of Bristol, let alone been on a holiday. For many of these children, all of whose consciousness is post-2001, anyone different from them is a terrorist, an illegal immigrant, a job-stealer or a sex attacker."


 In a major shift of Western ‘thinking,’ America allowed, watched and welcomed Shitite Iran turning its F4 jets against the Solunnis of Isil in northern Arabia (Indie, 3 xii). For America to wake up to the fact there was a Muesli civil war going on, and that the USA had long backed the wrong side (the treacherous mediaeval princelings of Saudi, Qatar etc) was a serious breakthrough towards the Russian vision of supporting the Shitites of Syria and Iran as the best way to defend Europe from Muesli madness, and above all of breaking the Turko-Saudi Sunni spine.

Help also came from the Egyptian army which had managed to get the Muslim Brotherhood under control and set free anti-fanatic former dictator Hosni Mubarak. (Exemplifying its message to looneys, Egypt awarded death sentences to 118 fanatics who had managed to kill 11 policemen.

Needless to say, Western TV screens were full of caterwauling by fat Egyptian wives – the media folk still far gone in ‘Arab Spring’ nonsense and unable to realize that Western policy was, late in the day, shifting to target mad Solunnis and their cowardly billionaire backers.)


 The feeble nature of the EU’s ‘border controls’ was exposed as waves of thousands of A/As stormed the three 20’-foot high wire fences around the Spanish colonies in Africa of Melilla and Cueta, with scores of the ‘refugees’ managing to break through in a single day (Daily Mail, 4 xii). Evidently no-one dared say that these invaders of Europe were enemies and would be shot. (Or perhaps Germany regarded the exercise as some kind of IQ test which would select the very best rubbish for deployment in Europe’s – i.e. Germany’s -- factories?)


America’s Blacks, whippers-up and hangers-on were given fresh momentum in outrage as a Grand Jury in New York’s Staten Island [perhaps the USA’s nicest area] declined to prosecute the case of a 22-stone Black father-of-six who had struggled to resist being handcuffed by a White cop who finally got him in a headlock, killing him (Indie, 4 xii).

 The Black was apprehended for selling loose, untaxed cigarettes. Unbeknown to the cop, he had a medical record of asthma and heart disease. Riots ooops protests were promptly planned in Washington by Black agitator Al Sharpton even though the US justice department said it was mounting a full investigation of the case, which followed a heavyweight Black robber being shot by a policeman in Missouri as he threatened the cop, calling the officer too “pussy” to use his gun.

{Just why most Blacks accepted largely-White medicine, education, policing and welfare was something of a mystery. It could be that, like South Africa’s Blacks, they preferred facilities run by higher-IQ Whites to any run by Blacks. Or it could be there was nowhere else to go because of Blacks’ reputation for destroying any area on which they got their hands – Africans specially noting that Afro-Americans, despite their relatively charmed lives, had never managed to take over a single US state.}


  That puritanical lesbian left-feminists’ persistent efforts  to link with Black-worshipping cultural Marxists had been a flop was manifested as the leading American lingerie firm ‘Victoria’s Secrets’ produced a Christmas display of bras, boobs, knickers, garters and stockings that would have been perfectly acceptable at the height of sexual liberation c.1970 (D.Mail, 4 xii, ‘How did 50 years of feminism end in this?’).


  The cultural Marxists, anti-racists and transgendered lesbians of Australia’s university sinecures got the shock of their lives as they were told by Queensman PM Tony Abbott – perhaps wanting to encourage a rebirth of Christian civilization -- that lunis would have their funding slashed by 20% and that students at theological colleges would in future be eligible for government funding to the tune of 5K Oz dollars p.a. per student.

Even colleges teaching the more weird and wonderful Catholic versions of birth control would be government-funded – though any reduction in birthrate was to be welcomed for export to the south Pacific whose natives would otherwise overwhelm the Workers’ Paradise as soon as they could get cash together for boats and bribes.


After a week in which a ‘major speech’ on immigration by PM DD had done nothing but try to sweep under the carpet the Coalition government’s abject failure to realize its promises to get a grip on modern immigration (chiefly by gypsies and benefit-seeking Bulgars), brave and largely isolated Labour MP Frank Field reiterated his concern that there were no plans for how to cope with dirt-poor immigrants ‘needs’ (for skules, ‘ospitaws etc), let alone for how to integrate them rather than have them turn Britain into a corrupt, murderous and ignorant country like one from which they came (BBCR4, 5 xii, 07:40).

Field’s effort was in response to the left-dominated ‘education’ racket deciding to offer kids ‘O’-level exams in Britain’s history of immigration (D.Telegraph, 1 xii) – a ‘history’ which would doubtless value the ‘contributions’ of Romans, Germans, Vikings, Danes, Normans, Huguenots, Dutch, Jews and Irish while drawing a veil over the negative contribution of Blecks and Peks who had dumped more immigrants in Britain of the previous fifty years than had arrived from Europe in the previous five thousand.

Meanwhile America furnished nightly demonstrations of the impossibility of coping with A/A’s as Blecks took time off from the benefit queues and food banks to march around several cities with coffins intended to remind White-guilty ‘liberals’ of their naughtiness in occasionally killing Bleck criminals who vigorously resisted being brought in for a lethally expensive White-funded process of court trial and multiple appeals.


Swedish politicos who had flooded the country with disaffected Syrians and kindred A/A’s took a hit as the ‘far right’ Sweden Democrats (on 13% in polls) used their influence to bring down the country’s new (‘moderate’, i.e. third-world-worshipping) government and precipitate fresh elections (Indie, 5 xii, p.1, ‘Forget everything you know about nice liberal Sweden – that country no longer exists,’ Emanuel Sidea):

"The Swedish way of politics has often been put forward as a role model for other countries. Almost everyone has heard about the Swedish model of fair wealth redistribution, proper budget policies, a welfare state with good benefits, and a large public sector. They've also probably heard of how all of this has been achieved through mature bipartisanship, and a visionary embrace of reform.

    But yesterday's collapse of the newly elected government is just the latest sign that Sweden has started to transform into a less functional {??}, more European-style country. After only three months of his party being in power, the Social Democrat Prime Minister Stefan Löfven has called a snap election to take place in March."

Yes, after a generation of Stockholm being overrun by Mueslis and turned into the rape capital of Europe by wishful thinkers and vote-getters, the worm was turning.


Dresden, the reconstructed powerhouse of Saxony, produced 7K demonstrators to protest Islamification. A mere 1K leftists turned out, though backed by 500 police to protect them from White patriots (The Local, 2 xii, photo of demo from River Elbe).

Dresden had seen successive demonstrations over what participants regarded as excessive influence of Islam in Germany and Europe. Marches were called by the so-called Pegida Alliance, an abbreviation of the German for “Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West”.

    The issues of asylum seekers and Islam had fuelled tensions in a number of Germany’s cities during the 2014 autumn. Numerous demonstrations took place against what participants regarded as excessive influence on society by Islamic communities. Some protests specifically targeted the Salafist branch of Islam and bids by some members to introduce aspects of Sharia law in German cities.

Forty-five people, including 44 police officers, were injured in November in Cologne during clashes with right-wing groups marching under the banner “Hooligans against Salafists”. Growing activism against Islam had also translated into hostility towards asylum seekers in Germany, many of whom came from Islamic countries.

    In a November survey, researchers at the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Berlin found that 42 percent of respondents believed that most asylum seekers arriving in Germany were not persecuted in their homeland."


  As America erupted in yet another spasm of cop-hating from riotous, criminal, unemployed, welfare-dependent Blacks, the ‘liberal’ Jewish New York Times declared itself unequivocally pro-rioter; but was promptly answered in the National Review 1 xii, Heather MacDonald):

"The Times serves up a good example of anti-cop propaganda when it confidently states that “many police officers see black men as expendable figures on the urban landscape, not quite human beings.” That will be news to the thousands of police officers who are the only people willing to put their lives on the line to protect innocent blacks from predation [mainly by other blacks]. Until the Times’ editors and reporters start patrolling dark stairwells in housing projects and running toward gang gunfire, their superior concern for black men will lack credibility."


 A self-proclaimedly “Eurocentric” firm, Ostara [apparently US-based], appeared on the publishing scene, especially promoting its Victory of the Mind [by philosopher-historian Thomas Martin] which apparently detailed how the West had succumbed to Africanism – presumably acknowledging how the bloodthirsty anti-German ‘revolutionaries’ of France [well, Paris] had repeatedly wrecked European culture

(with the help of demakratic politicos in Britain taxing their own country’s aristocracy to downfall by death duties, stripping the House of Lords of its powers in 1910, and finally killing their elite by putting them in the front line in two World Wars).


 Manchester’s top cop, Sir Peter Somebody, took to the airwaves to complain he was fed up with police having to adjudicate on the street as to which groups were more ‘extremist’ – Mueslis or Christians, racists or anti-racists, homophiles or homophobes, Jews or Palestinians etc (Guardian, 5 xii).

So should this job (which began to be imposed by LibLab ‘race hate’ laws from 1966) simply be abolished along with all efforts to control thought and speech? Not at all, opined Sir Peter! Rather, schools, colleges, firms, sports clubs and churches should establish their own thought-policing and thus spare cops to pursue their heavy desk-bound duties of prowling the internet for paedophilic images and prosecuting 80-yr-olds for ‘raping’ (aka having sex with) besotted female fans in the 1970s...


 As moto-neurone-diabled computerized genius cosmologist Stephen Hawking, 72, felt obliged to deliver himself of the time-honoured fear that robots might take over the world (Indie, 7 xii), it turned out he had neglected:

"that computers had no capacity to take in raw information – as in an inspection time test – and could only process data pre-digested and spoonfed them by humans in 10111001111100 formulae;

that computers necessarily had no consciousness because they had no idea of what was important (and thus needed memorizing – always the hallmark of consciousness), having no underpinning drives for love, death, sex and turkey dinners;

that ‘artificial intelligence’ was far less dangerous than natural stupidity – as seen in Africa, Arabia and the inner sancta of the dysgenic Catholic Church."


 Just as America was nudging itself belatedly towards a Shitite-sympatico policy in Crazyrabia, Britain, under the wisdom of nincompoop Defence Secretary Philip Hammond, decided to re-invent itself an east-of-Suez role (abandoned in 1971 in retreat from Aden) by showering brutal Bahrain with cash for a ‘naval base.’

The handout could not be used for British ships, since Britain had none (at least, not equipped with vital aircraft till 2020) but would help Bahrain’s ruling Solunni minority to continue oppressing the tinpot state’s Shitite majority – keeping even ‘dangerous’ medical doctors awake standing up for days on end and urinating into the mouths of any who could no longer stand (Indie, 7 xii, Patrick Cockburn).

{Just why Britain could not give a lecture denouncing murderous Islamism, pull out, and let the s*ds dismember each other was unclear. – After all, both Muesli factions would want to save and sell the oil that would hopefully be their last blessing from the West.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, December 02, 2014


As the Thornberry affair (q.v.) sank in and Ukip looked able to take a good slice of Labour as well as Conservative votes, a new future seemed to beckon. Of course, both Britain’s big backers of third-world immigration and the ‘religion of peace’ that was busy taking scores of heads, genitals or other parts off weekly in the Middle East and north Africa rushed to stem the final haemorrhage of support from their already enfeebled parties.

But Labour’s demotion of Overweight Emily served only to give more publicity to her contemptuous photo of “remarkable” ‘white van man’ and his St George flags, and a further reminder that Hampstead-Jewish PPE graduate Millilitre had failed his ‘bacon butty’ test; and the Conservatives found the chairman of their influential and once-right-wing ’22 Committee’, one Charles Wheeler (evidently ‘modernized’ in line with Cameroonianship), met with a barrage of hostility as he was wheeled out to lambast Ukip in even the Mail on Sunday, once thought suitable for reading only by hardened populist Conservative C2s (23 xi).

No: times they were a-changin’. Red Ed Millilitre’s closest buddy (OE) had revealed – with her visual aid of the century – what had become steadily more obvious to political observers since 1970: that Labour was now the party of the Establishment, commanding the state machine (with its millions of jobs and inflated salaries) of ‘welfare’ Britain and subsuming what was left of the Church of England and the House of Lords to its piety, assisted when necessary by ‘uman rights mandates from Brussels, and always by ‘Conservative’ non-intellectualism and cowardice.

So what would be the role of Ukip? Why, if leader Farage could keep up his beer consumption, Ukip seemed all set to be the cavalier plebs of the century, with the energy of cage-fighting van man, a healthy determination not to be run by people who cannot even speak English (let alone make or enjoy a joke in the language), a preference for personally chosen rather than state charity, and hopefully with determination on freedom and even free speech near their core (once they could overcome their own trepidation about being called ‘racist’). )

     That Ukip was indeed most ‘in touch with the white working class’ was indicated by a YouGov/Times poll reporting 27% agreed, whereas only 21% said the same of Labour (D.Mail, 26 xi). Among white working class voters the gap was even wider: 29% thought Ukip best represented them, while just 20% thought Labour was most in tune with their lives.

     That contempt for the working class was well distributed among the Westminster elite was strikingly demonstrated as former Conservative minister and culture vulture David Mellor (sacked in 1992 for hanky-panky and anti-semitism), fatigued from Buck House drinkies for privy counsellors, inadvertently provided a five-minute foul-mouthed tirade addressed to his cabbie (who had somehow upset the great man – probably by failing to recognize him, and by not knowing the quickest route from the palace to a Belgravia restaurant) – the rant being secretly recorded by the cunning driver (D.Mail, 26 xi).


 Any wishing to understand British Ukip voting and the fury at third-world immigration that lay behind it could hardly do better than look at the 1990-2013 figures from the Office of National Statistics (reproduced by the Speccie’s editor, Fraser Nelson, in an incomprehensible attempt to defend Home Secretary Topwitch Theresa as having fractionally reduced non-European immigration – 24 xi). Beginning with a modest but already unwanted total of 75Kp.a. immigrants to the UK in the 1990s, Labour (as it took power from the uneducated, egalitarian, useless and adulterous ‘family man’ John Major) let immigration surge to around 250Kp.a., from which it showed no decline in Coalition years despite LibCon promises to get it back to 1990’s levels.

Thus, even with most politicos pledged against it, from immigration alone (forget about the increasing burden from Pek wives and sick sprogs [from cousin marriage] and illegal immigrants [which many preferred to be – to avoid taxation]), the UK was adding a city the size of Edinburgh every two years without the slightest effort from multiculti-worshipping politicos to provide the roads, drains, ‘ospitals and skules that would be necessary if London and the Midlands were not to become another Bangladesh.


As Britain’s LibLabCon politicos laboured to lie that they would ‘listen’ and plan to plan to plan to limit even low-IQ immigration, it turned out that they were dispensing not only £37 per week to every asylum seeker, £70 per week to any unemployed, free elf, edukashun and ‘ousing (not to mention legal aid for any complaints, and luxurious prisons) to any putting a foot on British soil, but a further £330 per week in ‘tax credits’ to any on lowish wages who claimed to have a couple of children (even if kept abroad) (D.Mail, 25 xi).

The thinktank Open Europe’s figures showed that in Spain, the average weekly take-home pay after tax for a single parent with two children was £362; in Poland it was £269 and in Bulgaria £149. In Britain, a worker on the minimum wage would earn £196, but that was increased by tax credits and other benefits to £527. It meant workers moving to the UK from Spain saw their earnings go up 45 per cent, from Poland by 95 per cent and from Bulgaria by a staggering 253 per cent. {Such was surely the end of Labour’s hopelessly unrealistic non-contributory ‘welfare state’.}

    Following a much touted ‘major speech’ to the House of Commons on immigration by Daft Dave, the Mail crisply observed that even the fabled short-term left-envisioned benefits of much immigration were non-existent once Labour’s tax credits etc for low-paid workers were recalled (29 xi):

DAVE’S big immigration speech was full of tributes to hard-working, highly qualified immigrants who ‘pay their taxes’ and ‘put into the system’. But the sad fact is that many Eastern Europeans take minimum wage jobs. A family of four with one parent in work will earn £196 a week, which is topped up to £527 by tax credits, child and housing benefits and more. Since no tax is paid on that take-home income of over £25,000, what are they ‘putting in’?


 Fresh from lampooning the hate-filled* lesbian-leftie single parent, calling herself ‘Jack,’ who wrote for the Guardian from her tiled kitchen cruelly to denounce PM Daft Dave for ever mentioning that his palsied and epileptic (dead-at-six) son had received good treatment from the NHS (such mentions, thought ‘Jack,’ being a prelude to making the NHS a proper insurance scheme – which DD had never shown the slightest sign of doing), the Mail’s Richard Littlejohn was ready for Christmas fun:

"Last week, I brought you news of how council killjoys had banned the annual Christmas parade in Poole, Dorset, and prevented a taxi driver in Barnsley wearing a white Santa beard for charity. Now officials in {anti-English, pro-Muslim} Dundee have gone a step further. Panicked by child protection considerations, kids are no longer allowed any contact with Father Christmas. Visits to Santa’s grotto have been replaced by, wait for it, a live link via Skype. Children are gathered in groups of up to ten, presumably because there’s safety in numbers, and can talk to Santa on the computer. A spokesman for the local shopping centre said the decision had been taken because some kids are frightened of Father Christmas. Well, that’s their story and they’re sticking to it. Meanwhile, Jimmy Savile remains dead."

* For a full presentation of leftist hatred, see Kerry Bolton’s (2013) The Psychotic Left – with CRB Foreword (q.v.). Modern British children’s ‘fear of Santa’ was probably due to fifty per cent of them growing up without a man in the house – thanks to determined socialist destruction of the nuclear family.


 After some two decades of suppressing free speech (about race, IQ, sex or handicap – not to mention paedophilia), British universities found they were  told by HMG to draw up codes of conduct which might help identify, suppress or even rusticate their more murderous Muslims (D.Mail, 25 xi). In a keynote speech worthy of any tinpot tyrant, Home Secretary Topwitch May said the threat to Britain from fanatics was ‘greater than it had ever been’ and warned an attack by extremists returning from Syria and Iraq was ‘highly likely’.

Such an injunction against ‘extremism’ in luniversities and most other institutions would prove perfectly welcome to academic zombies in so far as it would let them get rid of Muslims who called Jews ‘pigs’, women sexy and yags ‘diseased’ – so the notoriously Muesli-infested University of East London cancelled a rant by leading jihadist Abdoolally Fatah (officially citing the organizers’ proposed sex-segregation of the audience); but it would worry admin wallahs concerned with income streams from Qatar, Dubai, Saudi etc.

    At the same time, antisocial media such as FaceTube and YourSpace were told they must show ‘social responsibility’ by snooping and sneaking on anyone deemed later to have been a nuisance by HMG – a fate which these ‘media’ had long invited by allowing users to use their networks to communicate anonymously. {What a pity these institutional giants had not simply stood by free speech – by known individuals – in the first place!}


Did anyone ever wonder how Britain’s educational bureaucracy would cope with its late-in-the-day realization that skules in Muesli areas (Birmingham’s ‘Trojan Horses’ had reached press attention) were teaching the Koran, female subjugation, musicophobia and yagophobia at taxpayers’s expense? Would it say that parents could choose to spend their educational vouchers (of value according to taxes paid, divided by family size) as they wished? You must be joking!

PeeCee had an answer to every problem, and it never involved choice: so some six Mueslis skules were told to cut down on prayers and veiling; and, to parade even-handedness, a dozen Christian and Jewish schools in 99%-White rural areas were rapped on the knuckles and told to bring in imams to increase their ‘diversity.’

Claims of "political correctness" were rejected by Sir Michael Wilshaw, the fat, balded and overpaid chief inspector of skules, who insisted all schools had to be "realistic about the diverse society we now live in" (D.Telegraph, 25 xi).  Yes, a ‘British’ solution to a problem created by British politicians!


 Speculating that Labour’s money-grabber and brother-kicker Ed Milliltre’s unpopularity might not for nothing be focused on his difficulty in handling smoked pork (Indie, 27 xi),

‘Bacon Butty Ed’: months after the event, the incident that typified, for the right-wing media, Ed Miliband’s lack of ordinary blokeishness, is still highlighted

the interesting fact emerged that Jews in 7th-century Spain had deemed it circumspect to be seen eating pork and, so their kitchens would provide immediate signs of their integration, would strew dishes with little pieces of chopped ham – hence today’s serrano ham pasta bake. Shrewd Red Ed’s lofty Marxist-intellectual parents had evidently avoided this precaution; so not-so-truly-multiculti Ed’s ethnicity could occasionally be glimpsed and he was known to London cognoscenti as ‘The Beaker.’


 Having lost the official ‘war on terror’ (in Eyerak and Afghooniland), failed to bring Pakiland, Yemen and Saudi to heel, turned Libya and Syria into piles of rubble, allowed the rise of Isis, antagonized Russia, and failed to raze even a single mosque in response to Muesli atrocities, Peace Prize Nobelist Pres. Obarmy decided he must look to his ‘legacy’ and deploy the largest force available to him (the US military – 50% of the world’s armed force) – but secretly.

Obama made his “This year we will bring America’s longest war to a responsible end” statement in the White House Rose Garden, on television in June. The new extension of the Afghan war (just as British troops pulled out) was reportedly executed by a classified order (Guardian, 27 xi). Meanwhile, Obama was up there smiling next to his ‘retiring’ Defense Secretary, Chuck Hagel, talking about how “reluctant” he was to see him go.

The American president, like the one before him, was apparently reluctant to be upfront with the public about war. {Sensible Americans doubtless agreed. Familiar only with success – except against Canada – they had lost (with the help of fracking) that interest in the Middle East which had once inspired them to insist on taking the hell-hole over from Britain and France in 1956.

Even feminists – the main group protected from Islam by the West – did not want war, preferring to stick like leeches to the vote-wanting left as it ditched the Jews. So only secret war was tolerable against real rapists, beheaders, child abusers and their retinue of psychopathic chancers and religious maniacs. Mercifully, a few thousand Yanks and Brits could easily beat these scum, so long as the ignorant and half-hearted Obarmy stayed out of the way.}


Somali ‘culture’ decreed that men should pass their gals around to each other. Such, at least, was the hedonistic story that fourteen Somali pimps told to teenies as young as 13 (some ‘groomed’ from age 11) – as revealed in Bristol Crown Court where the men were sentenced to prison stretches ranging up to thirteen years (Independent, 28 xi).

Whether the girls had any other contact with Somalia was undeclared – as was their race [mainly White], which was kept hidden by Britain’s increasingly secret ‘justice’ system; but quite a few of them were willing believers – with the help of the “weed” [marijuana] given them as they were instructed to lie back and think of Somalia. The sluts were typically paid £30 per session; but some admitted quite enjoying their anthropology practicals as preferable to the “lonely” life of a UK ‘care home.’


As America faced substantial rioting in Ferguson (nr St Louis), involving scores of torched cars, wrecked buildings and arrests (and Blacks hurling bottles of urine at cops), President Obarmy (though given the thumbs-down in mid-term elections) pulled out all the stops on his organ: he blamed a (one-third-Black) Grand Jury’s decision not to prosecute a cop for shooting a heavyweight Black robber (who was charging him head-down and calling him a p*ssy) on the judicial system; to prevent Black madness yielding murder, he sent in 40K National Guardsmen (half the size of the British Army); and, providing reinforcement for any future Democrat president in a spot of bother, he granted ‘executive amnesty’ to 5M illegal Hispanic immigrants. The USA’s top ‘far right’ columnist, Pat Buchanan, did well to call Barry Hussein “a rogue” (VDare, 20 xi):

"Today, in 2014, after an influx of perhaps 50 million in 50 years, legal and illegal, no longer from Northwest Europe, or Europe at all, but Latin America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East, of every race, color, creed, culture and language we seem less a nation than some mammoth Mall of America. An economy, but not a country.

    Running in 2008, Obama said he intended to become a “transformational president.” With this decision, he succeeds. He has accelerated and ensured the remaking of America. Now when the wives and children of the illegals arrive, and their extended families apply for and receive visas, and bring their wives and children, we will become the Third World country of Obama’s dream, no more a Western nation. But then the community organizer [from Chicago] did not much like that old America."


 As Whites lost control of their (rebellious) country, a spectacular visual aid came from the once-lovely east-coast American city of Baltimore (MSN, 20 xi). Gang leaders ruled the Baltimore City Detention Center, using smuggled cellphones to direct crimes on the streets outside, dealing drugs and getting four guards pregnant, a prosecutor said at the opening of a major corruption trial involving dozens of officers and inmates.

Prosecutor Robert Harding said corrupt guards {presumably Black} allowed the state-run jail to become the undisputed turf of the Black Guerrilla Family, a gang led locally by a Black called Tayvon “Bulldog” White. White was indicted in 2013 along with 16 other inmates and 27 correctional officers, but agreed to cooperate and was expected to testify against the others. The indictment detailed how compliant guards helped BGF members smuggle drugs and cellphones -- crucial for conducting outside business -- into correctional facilities.

Just who was boss in the Baltimore jail became evident in a call “Bulldog” made to a friend in January 2013 while he was behind bars awaiting trial on an attempted murder charge, court papers showed. “This is my jail. You understand that,” White was recorded as saying. “I make every final call in this jail . . . everything come[sic] to me.”


  The plight of the race realist in the hysterical world of modern ‘science’ was dramatized as top geneticist James Watson announced he would sell his Nobel Prize medal (won in 1962 for his role in discovering the structure of DNA) and spend the proceeds on his own scientific operations (BBCR4, 29 xi, 07:25; Financial Times, 28 xi). Watson, 86, said his casual remark, to an apparently friendly Sunday Times journalist, linking race and intelligence, had led to him being largely stripped of honours and position and made a “pariah” among the younger generation of ‘scientists’ who held the purse strings and maintained media acceptability by wilful ignorance, lies and evasions {as instructed by their luniversities}.

In 2007, Watson had said African descent was “inherently” associated with low IQ. He subsequently became “an unperson,” he said: “Nobody wants to admit I exist.”

    It was thought the gold medal – the first to be sold by a living recipient Nobelist – would raise around $3M, some of which would go to fund work at the University of Chicago and Clare College, Cambridge, which had “looked after me,” and some to the purchase of a small painting by David Hockney. Like other race realists, Watson said he was “not racist in a conventional way.”

Preparing for the sale in New York, Christie’s called him “the greatest living scientist,” while feeling obliged to add that great scientists’ discoveries “transcended their human foibles.” Watson still possessed the original handwritten manuscript of The Double Helix, which he reckoned could raise a further $10M. He had been born in Chicago and made his DNA discoveries in Cambridge.

    {Following the deaths of Lee Willerman, Hans Eysenck, Glayde Whitney, Art Jensen and Phil Rushton across the previous two decades, Watson, Richard Lynn and I were the only known ‘scientific racists’ – though top psycholinguist and writer Steven Pinker had become a firm hereditarian and bitten the bullet on Jewish IQ superiority, and top scientific columnist Nicholas Wade had made a brave and scholarly fist of arguing for deep-seated race differences in Personality and Intelligence (A Troublesome Inheritance – q.v.). Watson had sometimes denied that the race-IQ link “had any basis in science”; but there was no sign of him having read The g Factor or IQ and the Wealth of Nations, and, anyhow, no-one took his protestations seriously.}


The West’s revolting plague of obesity, which had ‘required’ taxpayer-provided elf services (notably for ‘type II diabetes) to expand bed sizes and send cranes to lift fatties through their roofs (since they couldn’t get out of their own front doors), was firmly denounced by Daily Mail columnist Amanda Platell (29 xi):

"Instead of encouraging a sense of victimhood, the NHS should confront the obese with the plain facts, born out by endless studies, that if you eat less and exercise more, you lose weight. And if they still won’t take responsibility for their own health, then how about asking them to pay towards the treatment of their symptoms, instead of asking us to fork out millions for gastric bands? I am aware that smokers and drinkers, whose ailments are similarly self-inflicted, cost the NHS billions, but at least they pay a disproportionate amount into the national coffers from the taxation on their vices. Not so the obese."

And what about druggies and dealers? Yes! Why not legalize them, tax them up to the hilt, and make them (or genuine insurance) pay for their ‘needs for rehab’ {as I have urged since 1968}?


 As Australia emerged from a week of disasters (hailstorm and flooding in Brisbane, a gifted young batsman killed by fast bowling in Sydney) our London cricket correspondent offered analysis and advice before the elf’n’safety killjoys could move in (, 28 xi):

"There is a very real danger of a knee-jerk health and safety reaction to the tragic death of the Australian batsman Phil Hughes emasculating cricket.  Hughes was hit on the back of the neck  trying to hook when playing for South Australia against New South Wales. He collapsed unconscious on the field and died two days later after suffering a bleed into the brain caused by the blow compressing an artery feeding the brain.

    Hughes was incredibly unlucky because death resulting from being hit by a cricket ball is very rare indeed. The last cricketer to die after being hit whilst playing first class cricket in England was George Summers in 1870, and he probably died unnecessarily because he refused to follow medical advice to rest after the blow. (Summers died four days after being hit on the head).

    In the 151 years since overarm bowling was legitimised in 1863 only one death in first class cricket in England occurred. For around 120 years of that time  helmets were not in use  – Helmets came into general use around 1980.  That  tells its own story: the risk of death from being hit by a cricket ball when batting is vanishingly small.

    Before  helmets arrived  good batsmen were adept at getting out of the way or proficient at hooking and pulling the fast short ball. In addition quick bowlers generally did not bounce tailenders. The consequence was very few batsmen  were hit on the head.

    .... Tragic as Phil Hughes’ death was the facts say there is no need to panic.  The risk of death or permanent serious disablement is minute in the case of cricket. Imposing rules such as no bouncers or developing helmets and other equipment so stiflingly protective that the physical fear factor is removed from the equation would emasculate it.  Sport needs an element of danger in it to have meaning. Let us keep it in the game of cricket."

Cricket was evidently a serious solution to multiculti problems, having helped keep the Blacks and Whites of South Africa from each other’s throats, allowed Pakistanis, Ceylonese and Hindus to vent their animosities with only the occasional bloodbath, and giving England a chance with Australia and New Zealand when rugby failed (as so often....). By contrast, the failure of Ireland, Wales and Scotland to adopt cricket had brought the UK to its knees, and Canada had long been far gone in PeeCee....


 PeeCee achieved the final objective of any tyranny – to achieve such concord with political rivals (and mastery of gobbledegook and meaningless promises) that there was no longer any point in MPs turning up in the House of Commons Chamber, except on spectacular occasions when their own remuneration was debated.

Doubtless such a visual aid had its unfair features (as maintained by the Spectator´s Isabel Hardman (29 xi) – e.g. MPs busying themselves elsewhere during non-decisive debates). But the truths were:

"that the Coalition HMG had no policies worthy of the name – having entirely failed to reduce state spending and the national debt, not to mention incoherent and murderous meddling with the Middle East and antagonizing Russia (not least with Prince Charles and Daft Dave likening Vladimir Putin to Hitler);

 that HMG had put MPs on holiday (from the Chamber) for half the year (because the Coalition parties could not agree on what legislation to seek);

 that 120 MPs were paid extra by HMG as office holders – i.e. they were 18th-century placemen who would never speak out;

 that HMG preferred to conduct its semblance of democratic debate by means of numberless quangos and ‘inquiries’ where HMG pulled the strings – rather than depute business to ‘the awkward squad’ of backbench MPs;

 that the PM was rarely seen in the Commons – unlike, say, Churchill, who regarded it as his business to be in the Chamber daily;

 that Parliament (including the upper House of Sycophants) had become broken as regarding its original function of subjecting government policy and issues of the day to scrutiny, debate and democratic control.


While British politicos, peecee journalists, priests and royals continued in their chosen habit of blindly ‘celebrating’ diversity, the employment market was more discriminating. A Dr Kebab of Bristol University used Office of National Statistics figures to trace ethnic differences in employability (Independent, 30 xi):

Of those in work, the researchers found only 23 per cent and 27 per cent of Muslim Bangladeshis and Muslim Pakistanis, respectively, had a salaried job. White British Jews had the highest rates, with 64 per cent in salaried jobs, followed by Hindu Indians and white Christian Irish on 53 and 51 per cent respectively. White British Christians, white British of no religion and black Christian Africans were all above 40 per cent.

Of course, Mueslis often had jobs in the ‘black economy’ of tax-evading Pek shops provided by their families. But an Indie correspondent added:

"I live in Istanbul, a Muslim city in a Muslim country. Let me tell you something, many businesses will not employ covered women or men with beards, they tend to work for companies who have religious backgrounds....often through choice. It is often the case that if a secular Turk, or foreigner, is available for a job, they'll get it before anyone with an obvious religious image. This is not a Western issue, it happens in Muslim countries as well."

Evidently the employment market realized that low-IQ x high-Psychoticism was an avoidable ‘challenge’ (aka bl**dy nuisance) even though the country’s eminences had knotted themselves into the religion of PeeCee.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, November 23, 2014


As the Observer and correspondents provided a pretty full breakdown of the horrors of London’s casino banking (where getting a pal to show info just two minutes before it went public could yield a fortune) (16 xi) and £2.6B in fines were levied on top UK and US banks, it became clear that the market in speculation was just as out of control as it had been in 2007/8.

Socialists had been unable to get on top of things – not least because they had done much to encourage and indeed compel lending [to ‘sub-primes’]; and liberal ideas [in Britain, of Uncle Vince Cable] of breaking up the banks so they were not ‘too big to fail’ or at least separated their ‘investment’ and deposit wings had apparently proved impractical.

So what was to be done about corrupted institutions that were running economies the size of Texas and had plainly got themselves into the position of power occupied by British trade unions of the 1970s? Well, just as the trade unions had had eventually to be pulled back to their original purpose of representing majorities of their own members, so perhaps it was time to drag capitalism back to its key point of ‘justifiable profit from investment’: as well as locking up a fair number of company directors, shareholders and spivvish traders, the simple measure of requiring that all shares be held for six months before they could be legally re-sold would arguably do the trick.

Yes, why not require ‘investors’ to prove themselves as ‘workers’ friends’ had had to do? {And, to demonstrate their long-term devotion to capitalism, bankstas might also be required to make donations to schools of their choice – schools which would surely be ‘selective.’ The saddest feature of unfettered capitalism – apart from its tendency to psychopathy, assisted by politicians – had long been that capitalists themselves did little to support capitalism.}


The ‘progressive’ Pope Francis, the head of a church which had long opposed contraception, divorce, eugenics and capitalism, took it upon himself to moderate his lately announced support for yag marriage by firmly denouncing abortion, euthanasia and IVF. The fact that his ‘congregations’ were mainly too sensible to obey his injunctions was apparently beyond him.


Three mainly Black/Red Indians in Brazil (two of them women) were given 63 years in prison for murdering a few low-lifes, eating some of them, putting others into the blender to provide ingredients for pasties, then going on to sell such pasties to schools and hospitals as containing (variously) chicken or tuna (Sunday Mail, 16 xi).


A new book, Crucified Again, by a Muslim/American scholar, Raymond Ibrahim, stressed that Islam’s thousand-year rampage through the countries of the Mediterranean and Adriatic had only been temporarily halted by Napoleon’s invasion of Egypt and the British effort to secure the area so as to keep open the route to India.

It received high praise in a review at historian Victor David Hanson’s website (10 xi). It also stressed the contribution made to Islamic revival not only by the oil which the West had discovered and developed but by the West’s descent, following its ghastly Wars, into irreligiosity, guilt about empire, self-hatred, deadbeat socialism, kindred egalitarianism, multiculturalism and thought-inhibiting peecee qualified by the need to venerate positively all sexual degeneracy (apart of course from paedophilia, for which quite a few Muslims had a soft spot).

{Yes, quite a primer for the new Crusades – if the Western democracies could be bothered to have them! Unfortunately, Americans’ understanding of what they were up against was as limited as their understanding of Hitler’s war aims till he declared war on the USA in 1942. – White Americans had been voting for Obarmy for eight years, intending to purge themselves of charges of racism.}


 No doubt excited by his 12% poll lead in the imminent Rochester by-election which he had triggered by defecting from the Conservatives to UKIP, Mark Reckless MP was moved to say he favoured deporting Polish plumbers who had been in Britain for more than two years. But what if they had wives, children, council houses and GPs, screamed the media. What if they had work? Had he asked Milkmaid Merkel? Or the ECHR?

Swiftly the appropriately named Reckless found his musings disowned by his new party (Guardian, 19 xi), at the heart of which was traditional if ill-informed racism covered by the party’s diplomatic decision that the answer to every problem of fifty years of the stupidity, criminality and welfare dependence of third-world immigrants was just to leave the European Union (whose only supply of difficult immigrants was of gypsies, who were not to be mentioned in line with MSM policy and with UKIP’s own copycat anti-racism).

The screeching of leader Garage as he braked to maintain the illusion of UKIP as being passably mainstream was pitiful to behold, though it might rouse some from their slumbers in which they denied the vast dominance of peecee-multiculturalism in British public life.

{Funnily enough, the policy of ‘pretend anti-racism’ had been thoroughly tried before – by the BNP, without final success. The problem with pretending is of course that it prevents proper discussion and planning about what to do about even the most glaring challenges arising from low IQ, which would be bound to continue as long as the welfare state.

The old joke about basic socialist thinking came to mind: ‘If poverty did not exist, we would have to invent it.’ Yes, that was exactly what politicos had done by egging 50% of families into divorce and single-parenthood.}

     Taiwan (IQ 107) had a well-established policy of requiring immigrants to return to their motherland at least once every three years – and thus not to put deep roots down in the island.

Presumably Mark Reckless had some such scheme in mind but was not given time on the hustings to explain such thinking. As it was, his recklessness required diplomatic UKIP to issue a blanket guarantee to Britain’s 3M European immigrants (as equally to 7M others) that they would in no way be targeted by UKIP policies. Leftist voteseekers had never had it so good – even though they would come an ignominious third in Rochester!

     That PC/MC had penetrated down even to the lower circles of government was illustrated as a nice rural Lincolnshire primary school was downgraded from ‘excellent’ to ‘good’ by ‘Ofsted’ bureaucrats just because it did not supply enough experience of ‘diversity’ – this in an area where 97% were British and 100% of the school’s pupils had English as their first language (Daily Mail, 19 xi). A visual aid:

The delightful pupils concerned

A Mail correspondent put the matter well: “Political correctness must be the biggest threat to this country, even more than terrorism.”


  As PeeCee tightened its grip, the 1970’s children’s beloved storybook character ‘Paddington Bear’ found himself subject to elf warnings by government busybodies and recommended as unsuitable for viewing or reading by children under  twelve; tough-talking American clown Julian Blanc who promised to help young men to get dates and bedtime with gals by appearing more manly found himself banned from entering Britain by Home Secretary Topwitch Theresa May after she had been sent a cascade of tweets from feminoids; and another ‘Conservative’ ministress announce she would pressurize gyms to ban mirrors since she thought fatties were upset by images of themselves (especially in lycra) and thus abandoned their good resolutions to take exercise (D. Telegraph, 19 xi).

    A fine review of the censoriousness of Britain’s luni students as they hysterically closed down (‘no-platformed’) all expression of views that made them ‘uncomfortable’ was provided in the Spectator by Brendan O’Neill (22 xi). Examples came from closures of debates at Oxford, Cambridge, UCL, Dundee and Edinburgh.

Calling them ‘Stepford Students’ (after the zombies in the film ‘Stepford Wives’), O’Neill foresaw yet more tyranny for Britain ahead as these hypersensitive left-lesbians took up official positions (as affirmative action demanded).

{Yes, almost twenty years after the already frightened administrators of E.LU. had spent £100K to get rid of me, it was turning out that their payment of Danegeld had done less than nothing to stem the egalitarian tide of the countless irreligious, ignorant and agrammatical ‘students’ whose fees they had sought.}


 A sign of surviving life at the LUniversity of Edinburgh emerged as leaks came out of a student ‘fraternity’ joshing about how to ‘rape’ [the feminoid term for ‘having sex with’] fat and ugly leaders of the LUni’s rabid Feminist Society (Independent, 20 xi, with visual aid of the ‘green’ destruction at Old College of the Principal’s car parking space). So shocking was such talk that a ‘senior academic’ and retinue of secretaries, dishwashers and lawyers was sent in to investigate and silence the jesters – who used LUni premises for their gatherings under the title of ‘The Mandarin Society.’


 An iconic Black comedian, known to millions as America’s Daddy, Bong Cosby, 77, was hoisted by feminoids for hanky-panky with girl fans of the 1980s – one of whom he had repeatedly ‘raped’ over a two-year period {so enthusiastic was she}, with the help of dishing her encouraging drugs. Hearing of fifteen complainants pursuing money ooops ancient grievances, MSM decided Bong’s precise naughtinesses were too horrendous (or was it too trivial?) to be mentioned but found Bong guilty and declared an end to his career as a fitting sentence (Guardian, 20 xi).

Yes, in the brave new world of PeeCee, abusohysteria trumped mass veneration, long-distance careers, justice and even holy Blackness – though Bong’s mega-popular ‘Cosby Show’ had not been afraid to mention Black failings, no doubt infuriating the US ‘liberal’ elite.

Cosby’s speech in 2004 had actually expressed, at some length, his exasperation with Black Americans blaming White people for their problems. {The contempt of ordinary folk for the trial-by-MSM was shown as Bong drew a packed house in Florida for his usual 1½-hr comic routine, without a voice raised in complaint.}


 The top casualty in the Rochester by-election (20 xi) was leader Millilitre’s close ally, his elfin safety secretary, Emily Thornberry. Though Labour had long distanced itself from its traditional White working class supporters (whose unions of non-workers had had to be reigned in by Mrs Thatcher) and concerned itself instead with currying favour from Britain’s ‘minorities’ (Blecks, Peks, wymmin, yags, transgendered, disabled etc), and of course from bankstas, while its leadership became all-graduate, this shift was never acknowledged, especially not in public.

And then, just as Labour was struggling in third place against PM Daft Dave and UKIP, along comes Emily, the sobworthy product of divorced parents (though daddy was a lawyer) who had failed her 11+ but ploughed on to the University of Kent (wot dat?...) and to be a ‘uman rights guru living on the same gentrified £3M-per-house Islington street as the Blairs (Guardian, 21 xi).

Despatched to campaign in distinctly provincial Rochester & Strood, the elevated Emily found herself much amused by the patriotic lowlifes who apparently planned to vote UKIP; and twitted as much to her friends to show her remarkable discovery of ‘white van man’ living in the all-too-typical council-supplied rabbit hutch without a garden yet still having enthusiasm for St George (if not having much skill in putting up flags).

Mrs Thornintheflesh’s snobby sneering had to be met by Millilitre firing her within hours from Labour’s Shadow Cabinet even as Overweight Emily repented her ‘lack of respect’ for the party’s traditional voters. Yes, with one click of a twit, and with a visual aid, Labour’s position as the party of the metropolitan elite had been seered into the public mind.

    It transpired that the ‘white van man’ was a hulking but genial giant, Dan Ware, 37, who was a father of four, a tattooed and shaven-headed cage fighter, and a property maintainer and car dealer who had always voted Conservative. He had put up his Union Jack flags in connection with the World Cup, and not because he was backing Ukip (the membership of which was notably more saloon-bar-friendly).


A prospect of reducing rabid African overbreeding (the average Nigerian man had seven children) emerged as research at giant pharmaceutical company Pfizer, funded by Bill and Melinda Gates, came up with an injectable contraceptive that lasted for three months and cost only one dollar a pop (Independent, 21 xi). The Gates were to begin trialling it in 69 of the world’s poorest countries.

{Savings could be wasted on ooops invested in schemes of elf care, education, Band Aid and arms supply more commonly favoured by Western idealists…. The cost of treating each ebola patient waved into the USA was $.5M – estimate by U.Nebraska Medical Centre (NBC News, 18 xi).}


The full fun of the failed Fourth Reich (aka EUSSR, best known for the 30% unemployment of its non-Nordic young) was exemplified as British lorry drivers were told by their haulier bosses not to stop within 200km (130m) of Calais lest their vehicles be boarded by teeming young Arab/Africans desperate to reach welfare-, housing- and elf-dispensing Britain.

At the same time, yeurolaw specified that lorry drivers must take a break every four hours, meaning the hapless drivers’ next break would be taken as they queued in Calais – an ideal arrangement for the thousands of A/As which Italy and France hoped to pass from the Mediterranean on to shangrilah UK.

    The A/A invaders themselves were quite discriminating. If discovered as stowaways, they always asked for return to France. They would rather risk another stowaway feat than get involved in being registered as asylum seekers in Britain – which would officially deny them employment opportunities. (Little did they know the incompetence of Britain’s ‘state-comprehensively’ miseducated C21 ‘officials’ who had got their jobs under affirmative action!)

    {You thought Mr Garage was calling a halt to such comedy? Not a bit! Farage was concerned to present Ukip as anti-racist etc and merely aiming to deliver Brexit (British exit from the EU). He preferred – at least for the moment – to forget that Britain’s politicos, press and public officials were as sworn to PeeCee as any pacificity-propagandized Teuton, and probably more so.}


An unusually realistic summary of Britain’s avoidance of discussion of what to do about Blecks and Peks was provided for the Speccie by Douglas Murray (22 xi) – a sample from its encouraging ending:

"We keep saying we want to ‘have a debate’ and ‘discuss’ immigration.  But we don’t.  Not really.  What we want to do is to please ourselves by saying – for instance – how wonderful the NHS is thanks to immigration and then ignore the real, long-term downsides and challenges that come along with mass immigration of the scale we have seen in recent years. We seem intent on ignoring the facts even as they keep cropping up all around us.

    Will the latest Ofsted inspection lead to a serious discussion of whether it is wise to keep letting large numbers of Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh into the UK?  Or how on earth we plan to integrate and adapt to British values the millions who are already here?  Of course it won’t.  To have that debate would be ‘racist’.

    So we shouldn’t kid ourselves that we’re having a debate, nor have any real intention to do so. Pretty bleak really.  Though if you need cheering up might I suggest one failsafe option?  Dwell on the number ‘349’.  That is the number of votes that the Liberal Democrats got in Rochester and Strood.  349.  It’s beautiful.  I can’t stop laughing.  There – it’s happened again.  349.  It’s wonderful.  The new magic number.  A number that has the potential to bring a limitless amount of happiness when you think on it."


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, November 17, 2014


Already admitted in Rotherham and Rochdale as the cause of police and social workers being unwilling to pursue Pakistani pimps and rapists, the fear of being accused of racism surfaced as a chief factor in ballot rigging and intimidation in the Bangladeshi-dominated London borough of Tower Hamlets [i.e. London’s East End].

According to star Telegraph columnist Andrew Gilligan, a high court inquiry had expressed grave reservations about the extent of electoral fraud, and a trial was to begin in January 2015. Voting papers had been filled in by fake voters, ‘mislaid’, put in the wrong bundles or altered so as to maintain the grip on the area of the local Muslim “mediaeval monarch” Luftfur Rahman; and council staff – mainly by 2014 selected by him – were loath to complain (9 xi).


 Christianity got its best ever chance of realism and reasonableness as scholars backed the story that Jesus had married (the possible prostitute, rescued by Jesus) Mary Magdalene and sired two children by her, acquiescing in a manuscript almost 1,500 years old unearthed at the British Library (Sunday Independent, 9 xi; Daily Mail, 10 xi).

The latest so-called “Lost Gospel”, which they translated from Aramaic/Syriac and studied for six years, suggested startling new allegations, according to the Sunday Times. Professor of Religious Studies Barrie Wilson [U. Toronto] and [Israeli-Canadian] historical writer and film-maker Simcha Jacobovici spent months translating the text, which they claimed to indicate that Jesus had two boys, Manasseh and Ephraim, and that the original Virgin Mary was Jesus’ wife and not his mother.

    The new manuscript added to evidence from the ‘gospels’ of Mary and John and to the considered judgments of southern-French mediaeval Christians [many burned as heretics in Béziers for believing Jesus’ descendants had intermarried with nobility to yield the Merovingian dynasty], Leonardo da Vinci and modern popular writers and film-makers.

The manuscript had passages torn out, probably as censorship. Written on vellum — treated animal skin — it had been in the archives of the British Library for about 20 years, where it was put after the British Museum had originally bought it in 1847 from a dealer who said he had obtained it from the ancient St Macarius Monastery in Egypt. It was supposedly in code, referring to Jesus as ‘Joseph’ [himself referred to by early Christian writers as ‘the son of God’].

The original document, dating to 1ad, had been destroyed c.325 ad as Emperor Constantine tried to get rid of as many gospels as possible [at least 20] which conflicted with the story of Jesus which, together with persecution-broken rag-tag church leaders, he wished to establish [as religious leaders who would justify him raiding mega-rich pagan temples].

But even the four canonical gospels referred to Jesus as ‘rabbi’ – which he could not have been in those days if he had not been married. {Later Christian antipathy to sex, physical love and heterosexual marriage came – with a little help from St Paul – from the Roman Church, probably because it wanted to inherit men’s money.

To re-write Christianity as centrally backing the relationship that people hold most dear would provide a great C21 breakthrough—one that the Church had spurned C20, leaving veneration of romance and physical love to the pop music industry.}

{How Jesus survived the crucifixion was explained 1972/2005 in ‘How Jesus survived the crucifixion.’}


Statistics can mean different things to different people....

Pretty similar until you compare the following:

Democrat Conclusion: Cold weather from global warming causes murder.


Two British yags (one – in a cowboy hat – apparently White, one (half-)Asian) stepped out to tell a worshipping MSM that they had somehow sired triplets by three gormless-looking fatties (D.Mail, 11 xi [Rememberance Day]) – a fitting commemoration of Britain’s useless sacrifices of its own and its Empire’s men across a century which had led to millions dead, millions imprisoned by communism, millions divorced, millions unmarried, millions on welfare (doubtless to include the yags’ sprogs), to obscene Western bankruptcy and to imminent Muesli and Mexican if not Chinese takeover.

Thankfully peace had been purchased – but at a colossal price. {Science, of course, had been a great ‘success story’ – enabling third-worlders to breed like rabbits and keeping Western oldies going to enjoy the pensions and 'elf care in ‘ospital for which the miseducated and idealistic young had been propagandized to pay from the shelf-stacking jobs which they got after ‘university.’}


 As pop ‘singer’ Bob Geldorf (apparently recovered from his daughter’s drug-fuelled suicide) proclaimed a new African crusade, this time against ebola, it turned out that the billion pounds of aid which he had dredged from Britain’s idealistic punters and tax-dispensing politicos for famine-plagued Ethiopia had actually “done more harm than good,” with the largesse vanishing into the pockets of criminals and despots when not being used used on soldiery to displace 1.5M ethnically unwanted people from their lands (D.Mail, 12 xi, Ian Birrell).


 The senior judge in England & Wales, Lord Chief Justice Thomas, declared he wanted an end to anonymity for defendants in serious criminal cases. His remarks came after a trial in which one ‘AB’, actually Erol Incedal [presumably Turkish or somesuch], had had his identity protected while being tried for (and found guilty of) plotting to blow up ex-PM Rev Blair (D.Mail, 13 xi).

{Under tyrannous PeeCee, the courts and MSM had long conspired to prevent the public from knowing any serious details of the identities, IQs, personalities or backgrounds of defendants – especially their race. The idea had been to present defendants as just digits in a system in which the public had no legitimate interest – all to prevent ‘stereotyping’, of course. – No concern for the London dinner-party needs of legal eagles and journos could be mentioned.}

{Whether Thomas would go on to denounce anonymity for wymmin accusers who made ‘rape’ allegations was unknown.}


 The UK’s PM, ‘Conservative’ Daft Dave, who had for ten years denounced the modest patriotic outspeakers of UKIP as “nutters, loonies and fruitcakes,” committed (most unusually) the authority of his high office to winning the Rochester & Strood by-election (in Kent, where Mr Garage’s saloon-bar anti-Marxists had a 12% lead over him) and pathetically appealed to all other parties to back him – thereby confirming the existence (at least in DD’s own mind) of the ‘LibLabCon’ peecee conspiracy to sabotage even the feeblest efforts to defend Britain as a home for Whites and high-IQ friends (D. Mail, 14 xi, Peter Hitchens).

At the same time, DD was not so bothered by the frothing hostility to Christians, Jews, Westerners and Whites shown by ‘British’ jihadists whom LibLabCon had let loose to behead as many ‘infidels’ as they could in Syria: these scum would only be prevented from returning to Blighty for a measly two years (if the UK-s useless Pek-run Home Office and ‘Border Agency’ could work out how to achieve such an unprecedented – in their annals -- bureaucratic feat) and subsequently be obliged to accept ‘supervision’ costing UK taxpayers £5K-per-Muesli-thug-per-week (D.Mail, 14 xi).

{What about executing these fanatical traitors? You must be joking – that would be really racist!}


 As a White British footballer (apparently a ‘role model’) found himself hounded by twittering feminoids for being allowed (by his club, Sheffield United) to resume his career after completing a prison sentence for ‘raping’ a girl (of which she, well liquored) had emailed friends enthusiastically as she submitted herself to two footballers in a hotel room at 4a.m.), it turned out that the un-peecee police of New Orleans had a more relaxed attitude to ‘rape’ charges, declining to follow up 60% of them.

Sunny veteran Black copperine Damita Williams even divulged to newshounds that she did not regard cases of “simple rape” as being ‘rape’ at all (CNN, 14 xi). {The efforts of feminoids to classify virtually all sex as rape had evidently made little progress in the Deep South.}


 Twenty-five years of leftist hysteria reached a new milestone as students at America’s Smith College, Massachusetts, denounced even ACLU officials as ‘racist’ for ‘insensitively’ and ‘hurtfully’ presenting in debate a case for free speech [long previously abolished on US campuses, as at the UK’s luniversities] (Wall Street Journal, 9 xi). {Smiff College was a super-elite, highly selective girl’s finishing school….}


 The incorrigible stupidity of Blecks was nicely exemplified as ebola was deemed a ‘plague’ sent to punish ungodly Africans and sinners who had angered God and their ancestors, according to a government witch-doctor, fuelling the spread of the disease (D. Mail, 13 xi). In an astonishing video rant, the ‘holy man’ appointed as head of culture in Liberia’s Bong [sic] County claimed only prayer, herbs and tobacco* could save the millions of people in danger from the deadly disease ravaging Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.

Waving a cow’s tail, Joko Moses Kuyon, a high priest of the African Traditional Religion, shrieked that the virus is a ‘curse’ that only traditional healers could lift. He shouted: ‘We have sinned against God and he has brought his wrath on us by bringing a plague. This is a plague and it has a spiritual connection. We have sinned against God and he has brought his wrath on us so we have asked the ancestors to appeal to God. We have the cellphone number for the ancestors and we dial the number and they relay the message to the almighty.’

This highly-respected government figure -- who preached to tens of thousands and was the ‘head witch doctor’ in his region -- was simply one among dozens of loons driving the epidemic underground.

* Admittedly this might be worth researching. Smoking certainly suppressed my own psoriasis for thirty years – as nurses concur when I quiz them while preparing to step into their sunray machines. (My patent number – for inquirers – is with my son in London....)


The Oz city of Brisbane, long renowned for its heavy drinking and right-wing attitudes to abos, became the latest world venue taken over for two-day dining from their £1K-per-night hotel suites of specially-flown-in world leaders (of the G7, G8, G20, NATO, SEATO, UN, UNICEF, IMF, EU, ECHR, FIFA, UEFA etc). Much smiling, back-capturing, embracing, petting [esp. of Burmese husband-deserter Ain Sang WhoShe) and kissy-kissing were in evidence as the ‘leaders’ agreed to maintain PeeCee and never mention that ISIL and kindred Muesli (Sunni) jihadists intended to behead them all -- along with any Jews and Christians who did not pay their Islamic taxes, and all educated women.

    Yes, there were some strains as UK PM Daft Dave decided to berate Russia’s ultra-popular president, Shia-backing Vladimir Putin, for having ingeniously hung on to Russia’s slice of the Ukraine; but Puto had brought four warships to Brisbane just in case, and planned to leave early from the love-in of fakes who salved their anti-imperialistic consciences by showering idiotic Africa with their taxpayers’ money.

{Even as the frauds met, north-eastern Nigeria was falling to Black Sunni goons who had already sold off hundreds of their virgin captives as ‘wives’ for their fighters – admittedly something of an achievement in that the kidnapped overfed Black schoolgirls seemed never to have heard of the waist-hip ratio....}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.