Monday, May 18, 2015


Scotnat hysteria – which (in response to years of Westminster uselessness and peecee suppression of frank discussion) had swept Labour away, even making Scotland a no-go area for Britain’s Jewish Labour leader Mililitre, having the country’s own Labour leader Murphy run for his life from a Glasgow mob and triggering a matching a nationalistic turn to the Tories in England – brought a response from Scotland’s richest and most popular woman, authoress J.K.Rowling (who had written her ‘Harry Potter’ children’s books in Edinburgh cafés and given £1M to the NO campaign re Scottish independence) (Sunday Mail, 10 v).

One Twitter user condemned her as a ‘traitor to Scotland’ and ‘Blairite scum’, while another wrote: ‘Go f*** yourself, you disgusting slimy Labour c***. All you lefties are finished in this country, especially you JK b****face.’ But the famed author, who lived in Scotland, responded: ‘The internet doesn’t just offer opportunities for misogynistic abuse, you know. Penis enlargers can also be bought discreetly.’


Mueslis who had (together with an Icelandic-Swiss ‘artist’) converted a former church on the bank of a Venetian canal into a seeming mosque – the first in Venice – were told by the city council to cease their occupation of and worship at the historic privately owned building by mid-May (Daily Telegraph, 12 v).
Not so lucky were the .4M displaced Christian Blacks of mountainous north-east Nigeria who, as they straggled home under army instruction, found virtually every one of their hundreds of church buildings damaged beyond repair by Boko Haram [‘No Western education’]. Only six mosques had been damaged in the course of six months of inter-ethnic hositilities.

Still, such destruction was tempered by the daily phenomenon of Mueslitunes blowing themselves to smithereens – e.g. Solunni gunmen killing 43 Shitites and injuring another score on a bus in the Pakistani 18M megacity of Karachi – and scouring the internet in Bangladesh to find and murder bloggers whose discussions of Darwin had shown insufficient respect for Allah. – Thus did the ‘religion of peace’ compensate a little for its century of overbreeding (funded by Western oil and blessed by Western Catholicism).

   In Britain, a new ‘conservative’ government announced it would close mosques that taught “poisonous” versions of Islam – though no examples were provided, let alone blown up. And intention was announced to fight off the E.U.’s demand that Britain accept a quota (perhaps 20K annually) of the A/A’s trying to cross the Mediterranean to escape the hellholes which Muslim fanaticism had made of their own countries. Still more daring was the right-wing Mayor of Venelle, France, who said Islam should simply be made illegal in the country (D.Telegraph, 16 v).


 It was not a ‘hate crime’ to say that a child had ‘special needs,’ decided Hove town council. The SN term had come to be used by British bureaucrats c.1990 as a polite/peecee way of referring to low intelligence – many other once-accepted descriptors like imbecile, idiot, moron, subnormal and retard[ate] having become shunned and banned by the hypersensitive.

But an experienced and popular headmistress at a Hove school found herself accused of ‘hate crime’ after she used the term at a meeting of the school’s governors – one of whom was the father of a high-IQ but autistic girl about whom the headmistress was trying to be polite.

Eventually the SN nomenclature was decreed as permissibly pious – though only after six months of inquiries and solemn meetings of Hove council and police and, in London, by the Department of Education (Daily Mail, 13 v).

    A Mail correspondent summed up: “Additional needs; special needs... why do people feel the need to keep inventing and reinventing these terms to hide the reality that some people are different? Not bad -- just not average. These terms won't change a thing. But, as shown here, when a certain term goes out of favour, almost overnight it becomes non-PC and deemed insulting. And always, behind it all, there are small minded people causing problems.”


  Oxford University Student Union announced that all college rugby teams would be required to complete mandatory ‘Good Lad’ workshops before they were allowed to enter this year’s ‘Cupper’ tournament at the university. The workshop programme, developed by 27-year-old Oxford graduate Dave Llewellyn and now popular with SUs across Britain, amounted to Mao-lite re-education in which self-flagellating men in plaid shirts promoted ‘positive masculinity’ to the misogynistic brutes of the rugger world.

Student politicos were so chuffed with the scheme that they planned to push it out nationwide. Requiring student societies to venerate equality, diversity, inclusivity and ‘safe space’ for the usual minorities had become a major preoccupation of British SUs.


The West, with its two generations of failing to test, charge or keep out migrants of dubious value, found itself set an example of national determination as Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines made it clear that they would turn back boats bringing the unwanted Rohingya people of Burma [‘Myanmar’].

These Solunni Muslims had a reputation for ugliness and violent extremism; and they had long been at odds with the Buddhists of Burma who, liking to believe that the Rohingya had come voluntarily from neighbouring Bangladesh in response to that country’s history of overcrowding and flooding, had never allowed them statehood and frequently indicated that they were ‘free to leave.’

But hostility to the Rohingya turned out to be widely shared; so there were soon thousands of them afloat in decrepit boats on the Andaman Sea – waiting of course for rescue, feeding, housing, employment, education and health care from the West’s taxpayers ooops humanitarians. The United Nations Human Rights Commission had designated Rohingyas as “the most oppressed people in the world”, but – along with Bangladeshis [East Bengalese] -- they had a long history of forcefully carving out their Muslim area from Hindus and Buddhists. The latest ‘persecution’ of them was probably in response to their having become supported by jihadists from Pakistan.

    What happens when nutty ethnics are not separated was exemplified as Burundi – which had, like genocide-prone Rwanda,  kept a bizarre mix of 85% Hutu and 15% taller, brighter, cattle-herding and English-speaking Tutsi – braced itself for civil war in which its multiculti army could well divide as to whether to support the country’s president for a third term in office.


 As UK Conservatives gloated over the daily news of leading Labourites calling their election loss a “disaster” and “catastrophe,” resigning in droves and admitting (especially larger-than-life Black socialist Diane Abbott) to having been in tears on election night, few politicos and panjandrums paid attention to the nationalism that had snatched Scotland from Labour and provoked an answer from English voters who did not care to see Labour ‘governing’ the UK from the pocket of the Scots.

Ukip, which had become the UK’s third-largest party and delivered 25 seats to the Conservatives by taking votes from Labour, even embarked on an orgy of in-fighting over a range of strategic, tactical and personal differences: its kow-towing to MSM’s demand for a peecee image had evidently made its top brass forget that its own voters were overwhelmingly race-realist and especially xenophobic about foreigners of high criminality and low literacy living off welfare handouts towards which they not contributed in taxation.

But amidst all evasive chatter about the stunning Conservative victory, at least the Observer’s Andrew Rawnsley detected the simple truth that English nationalism had been more roused than most commentators cared to admit (17 v): “Campaigners of all parties agree that the spectre of a Labour minority government being the puppet of the Scottish Nationalists helped the Tories tug English voters over to them. .... When Mr Miliband declared that he wouldn’t be bullied by the SNP he just wasn’t convincing to those voters already worried that he was weak and not to be trusted with the economy.”


 Whatever the shifting of ordinary mortals away from peecee nostrums, ignoracism carried on in glowing reviews of Gavin Evans’ Black Brain, White Brain – which apparently venerated the technological achievements by Zimbabweans of 100K years ago (Business Day Live, 8 v)....


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, May 12, 2015


As the Yukay concluded its astonishingly dull and endless election campaign (even political geeks like columnist Janet Daley were bored), the disattended real world of ethnic argy-bargy did not go away even if the peecee goons of Westminster and MSM could treat themselves to denial: such hordes of A/A invaders streamed across the Med that 3,690 were picked out of the drink by Italian coast ‘guards’ in a single day (Guardian, 4 v) – a number quite apart from the thousands estimated to have made it to dry land in Italy under their own steam; on the same day, ISIS/ISIL/Daesh slaughtered 300 Yazidi men; it was learned that A/A intending migrants, fed up with the frustrations of Calais, were moving their tents to central Paris; the Hutus of Rwanda continued their thirty-years of genocide (which had already killed 300K Tutsi) by putting to flight a further 30K; Syria continued as a four-year hellhole (thanks to a failure to separate rivalrous ethnic groups; and, in a new upping of ‘uman rights demands in Leicestershire, gypsies spurned a council offer to give them land for their vehicles because the proposed camp site was partly overseen by CCTV cameras.

{Perhaps the multiculti-propagandized English would wake up -- as occasional pundits pointed out the hostility to them of the Glasgow Celts revealed in the Yukay election?}

Gypsies/travellers make themselves at home (in Bristol) (Daily Mail, 4 v); but politicians kept such photo opportunities well hidden.


  Sex segregation at meetings targeting Muesli votes was defended by Labour Deputy Leader and human rights championess Harriet Harman (‘Hattie Harperson’) as she took part in a Birmingham rally at which all men and women (except those at the back) sat on opposite sides of the room (Daily Mail, 7 v).

 Hattie’s hubby – also a Labourite – had addressed another Labour-run meeting of sex-segregated Mueslis a few days earlier. The mullahcracy had decreed that the only alternative was male-only meetings. Tory candidate Julian Smith said: 'Labour are completely desperate. They are selling their values in exchange for a few votes.' {HH – Labour’s most senior and serious spouter of peecee baloney -- resigned as Deputy Leaderene in response to the débacle of May 7th. The Labour MP who had organized the Birmingham rally had prevailed on several mosques to order Muslims to vote Labour – though other mosques ordered their congregations not to vote at all.}


  The religion of political correctness having stifled most public debate and produced politicians who had to toe the line if they wanted to appear on MSM, the UK’s voters took the only passably acceptable way out and turned to nationalism {as foreseen in this blog} and swept Labour off the map in Scotland and the Liberals off the map in England, thus easily producing a Conservative overall majority at Westminster (despite the UK’s 9-party competition held within first-past-the-post rules).

Imitating the Scots, who had in eight months (since the referendum in which they had voted NO to independence) sensationally turned to nationalism in protest against lack of vision and ever-wanted money from London, the usually non-nationalistic English saw the point, helped by the prospect of ScotNat takeover (in alliance with spendthrift Labour).

Ukip, though increasing its vote share threefold compared to 2010, was not itself a beneficiary in terms of parliamentary seats of the new resolution to ‘do things our way’ – rather than as instructed by the fat lesbians and prancing pooftahs of the BBC; but the one-in-five Kippers who ‘came home’ on election day to Daft Dave’s pseudo-Tories could claim credit for a useful contribution to letting people do their own thing, run their own government, have their own say and keep out undesirables.

Sadly, Ukip’s brave leader, Nigel Farage, failed to win the seat he had selected; but equally he had failed to inject what most still thought his basic race realism into his campaigning, so his own political correctness had got its own answer. Whether ‘austerity’-antagonistic Scots would ever accept such fiscal autonomy as the English might be minded – with delight – to give them was a moot point; but the new nationalism would yield interesting and even realistic discussion of the different nature of the UK’s largest component countries.


 New boy on the psychogenetic block, Davide[sic] Piffer, Director of the Ulster Research lnstitute and a collaborator of Richard Lynn, reported that nine genes on which allelic variations correlated with IQ also showed B-W-A race differences and yielded a joint correlation of .90 with national IQ (once Lynn & Vanhanen’s data were updated to 2014) (AmRen, 3 v).


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, May 04, 2015


Reflecting on the dishonest and tyrannical Bangladeshi regime that had been exposed and ended in east London (q.v.), the Observer’s Nick Cohen remarked the ignominy of the British left (26 iv):

"Come on, admit it – it’s not just in the East End you see these tricks played. The postmodern universities and identity-obsessed scour speech for the smallest hint of bigotry, real or imagined. They seize on it – and with a whoop of triumph – cry that the mask has slipped to expose the true face of prejudice. Surely you have noticed, too, that in the paranoia that follows, careerists and charlatans flourish.

    Do not forget either that [Bangladeshi millionaire] Rahman at all times enjoyed the mulish support of Ken Livingstone and elements of what now passes for the British left.

The BBC, the Daily Telegraph, Private Eye and Ted Jeory, a fantastic Tower Hamlets reporter, who exposed on his blog the corruption stories that local papers wouldn’t print, fought back.

But with honourable exceptions, London’s leftwing press ignored the stink in its own backyard and dismissed the accusations against Rahman as evidence of a “deep substrate of” – you guessed it – “racism”.

    You might think that at least the Labour party stood firm. But it left it to four Tower Hamlet residents to take on the huge financial risk of fighting Rahman. The judge wondered whether “like so many others who have come up against Mr Rahman, the party was not prepared to risk the accusations of racism and Islamophobia that would have been bound to follow any petition”.

    One day, leftists and the Labour party will pay a price for their neglect and double standards. As it is, the price is being paid by others. Despite bordering on the opulent City, the East End of London is one of the poorest places in Britain. Many of its residents have no education; large numbers of Bangladeshis cannot speak English. They are wide open for hucksters to target. Too many stood back while they were shaken down, while money intended for them was diverted and their right to vote subverted.

    In the onlookers’ indifference we can find, at last, an authentic white racism amid all the phoniness: the racism that believes the immigrant poor deserve no better."

Nick Cohen won the 2015 European Press Prize commentator award

The Metropolitan Police took the point and said they would at last initiate the inquiries into criminal wrongdoing by Rahman and his Mueslis which they had declined to undertake across the previous three years.


 So! Yukay’s daftest General Election of a century would deliver a result of a kind by May 8th: a new crop of MPs, changed by fully a third thanks to the vagaries of the first-past-the-post voting system, would begin to make occasional appearances in the ‘tea rooms’ [bars] of the rat-infested Palace of Westminster and resume the self-appointed effort of the House of Commons to bankrupt the country and rid it of Christianity, to annoy as many foreign powers as possible (especially Russia, Spain, Israel and the Argentine), to wreck education by insisting a semblance of it be endlessly inflicted on the low-IQ and to get rid of the House of Lords (Britain’s only elite body of the slightest constitutional significance).

Yes! Exemplifying the worst horrors of which any had deemed democracy capable, Parliament had for 150 years been filling itself with the property-less, the spouse-less and the profession-less. Voted for by only some two thirds of the electorate according to incomprehensible constituencies of ‘safe’ seats where most votes were pointless, modern MPs provided a model of uselessness, their own votes ‘whipped’, their powers less than those of a town councillor and their motivations being to get a job on the government payroll and/or to prepare lucrative ‘directorships’ for their retirement.

To this bizarre exercise, voters (median age 55) decided how to spend the next generation’s money by opting for what they might think was a prime minister, a cabinet, a party or an unheard-of MP (in fact the last) in a system where the winning option was chosen by only 25% of the electorate. So weird had Britain’s ‘system’ of parliamentary democracy become that, of the party leaders appearing in nationally televised ‘debates,’ a half were not even MPs (Greens, Ukip, Scotnats, Welshnats).

    And yet! . . . This ludicrous system had actually been robust enough to deliver in the past half-century reasonable trials of the main political nostrums on offer. Socialism had brought hope after devastating wars even if it racked up more debt; capitalism had yielded growth even if the boom-bust casino cycle was not abolished; and political correctness had provided an internationalist piety and job creation programme to replace that of traditional religion even if bringing equally traditional tyranny and corruption.

So what would be next? Well, with three points of the attitudinal compass having been tried since 1950, it was arguably the turn of nationalism. That, at least, was what polls found Scotland to have decided in its sensational shift of voting preference from Labour to SNP (or CNP – Celtic NP); and the essentially English nationalism (and healthy racism) of Ukip seemed to be pulling in 18% support south of the border despite the determined effort of Westminster LibLabCon to demonize it (indeed, to sack or silence any who so much as whispered its name).

Yes! It could well be that the General Election would prove the beginning of the end of Britain’s three-party farce of quasi-idealism and the installation of Merrie England Mark II – and under who else but Balliol’s ‘Bonking’ Boris Johnson (hopefully guided by the practicality of Australia’s Queensman Abbott)? . . .

The coincidence of a nationalistic Election result with a Royal birth on May 2nd (of a fourth-in-line to the throne) would surely make the occasion especially auspicious.

{However, despite being given the gifts of A/As pouring into Europe across the Med, of jihadists advancing in Syria and of Black rioting wounding 15 police in curfewed central Baltimore, Ukip’s leader Nigel Garage – revealed as suffering health agonies -- declined to cash his chips, thus leaving English race realists somewhat in the lurch pro tem., amused only by Garage troubling to call SNP guru Fish a “racist” as if that were a criticism, and by the scores of long-legged, long-haired, wasp-waisted White Russian [Siberian] weenies who paraded in teeny bikinis for BBC3 TV as they rehearsed to model for the international fashion industry and remind the West of how the fillies of the Russian nation were uninterested in Muesli practices of covering up. . . .

As if leaping to Garage’s aid, a leading Eurowhalla Rumpy-Pumpy Junckedher decreed that the UK would have to increase tenfold its admissions of “the poor” of Africa – for “if they can’t use the front door they’ll break the windows” (D.Telegraph, 30 iv); but this prompted only a squeak from Garage about the risks of terrorism rather than any spelling-out of the risks of vagabondage, pilfering, disease, illiteracy, sorcery and stupidity posed by all but the cream of the cream of Black ‘asylum seekers’, spouses and sprogs.}

{The more exciting electoral scene in Scotland was correctly analysed by the Telegraph’s Alan Cochrane (30 iv): the stupendous rise of the SNP reflected a range of ‘anti- sentiments – anti-Tory, anti-Labour, anti-London, anti-English, anti-American etc.

Yes: after decades of seeing socialism and capitalism discredited, and the UK pseudo-managed by fat cats from organizations in business and government which changed their names annually and had no contactable addresses or phones, both Scots and English sought change (the Scots having the additional motivation of Labour over two generations failing to solve Glasgow’s problems); but the Scots had a plausible party to which to turn (SNP) whereas the English had only the covert racists ooops “fruitcakes, nutters and loonies” of Ukip who had been successfully demonized by the metropolitan peecee elite.}


 The publication of financial journalist James Bartholomew’s The Welfare of Nations was greeted with enthusiasm in the Telegraph, which gave it a one-page spread (27 iv); and at Amazon Books Professor of Education James Tooley (U.Newcastle) wrote (21 iv):

"This is a superb book from the acclaimed author of The Welfare State We're In. Whatever aspect of welfare troubles - or appeals to - you, you'll find it forensically but engagingly examined. I learnt so much about the history and geography of welfare, much to disturb, but also some intriguingly positive examples. Bartholomew is entertaining as always, but is prognosis for the welfare state is serious and needs to be addressed by all concerned with the role of government in our lives. I cannot recommend this book too highly."

Essentially, Bartholomew dismissed efforts to link unhappiness to inequality as biased, feeble or both; and instead pointed to researches finding unhappiness linked to state welfarism destroying jobs and families – though the direction of causation probably needed more proof and, in particular, examination of whether poor personality and intelligence might be doing the bulk of the causal work.


People trying to come to terms with the awesome earthquake in Nepal rapidly found that the country’s status as ‘one of the poorest on earth’ – and thus ill-equipped to cope with horror – was due substantially to long-term ethnic tensions between the country’s Mongoloid and Aryan peoples which culminated early-C21 in fighting between the more Buddhist Tibet-originated folk of the Himalayas who had gone communist and the more Hindu Indian-originated folk of the southern plains who retained affection for monarchy.

The southerners were people who had been able to afford to get away from the Muslim advance into northern India and regarded themselves as of higher caste, though the two groups mixed in Katmandu with repeatedly bloody results inimical to economic development.


IQ played a useful role for British researchers examining the somewhat unhealthy effects of drinking ‘organic milk’ – as opposed to today’s normal iodine-supplemented milk which usually supplies 40% of the body’s iodine, thus preventing the low-intelligence thyroxene deficiency that yields goitre (D.Telegraph, 28 iv, p.1; D.Mail,  28 iv).


As the latest development of its merry modern pseudo-religious censoriousness, Britain added to its paedohysteria, internet monitoring, hacking hysteria, persecution for date rape, failing to clean a dog’s teeth and Islamophobia, and banning of “transphobic” language by 3-yr-olds a new job for police (already too busy to find thieves and burglars): to investigate with all solemnity accusations of wolf-whistling (D.Telegraph, 30 iv).


 While the modest IQs of British soccer players were well known – and mentioned (Guardian, 26 iv) by Black footie star Sol Cambell -- players of American football had long been selected by IQ tests since they were believed to require intelligence. The Wonderlic testing organization specially mentioned endorsement by the US National Football League on its website.

"NFL Testing Provides Valuable Lesson for All Employers

NFL draft picks have taken the Wonderlic test for years because team owners need to know if their million dollar player has the cognitive skills to be a star on the field.

    What does the NFL know about hiring that most companies don’t? They know that regardless of the position, proof of intelligence plays a profound role in the success of every individual on the team. It’s not enough to have physical ability. The coaches understand that players have to be smart and think quickly to succeed on the field, and the closer they are to the ball the smarter they need to be. That’s why, every potential draft pick takes the Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT) at the combine to prove he does--or doesn’t—have the brains to win the game.

    The WPT is a short form intelligence test that measures players’ ability to think on their feet, follow directions, and make effective decisions under the pressure of a time clock. It was originally developed in 1937 as a tool to quantify the mental abilities of potential job candidates and today more than 2.5 million job applicants in companies across the nation are given the Wonderlic test as part of the hiring process.

The test is especially popular with larger organizations because it’s quick and easy to administer and delivers accurate information about candidates’ intelligence. “In just twelve minutes, they have quantifiable data about whether candidates can learn new skills, think effectively, and make important decisions under pressure,” says Michael Callans, president of Wonderlic Consulting, the Libertyville, IL based publisher of the test.

    The first use of the WPT in the NFL was by Tom Landry of the Dallas Cowboys in the early 70s, who took a scientific approach to finding players. He believed players who could use their minds where it counted had a strategic advantage over the other teams. He was right, and the test has been used at the combine ever since.

    Each year sports writers joke about jocks taking intelligence tests, but it’s a lesson to any business owner who is about to invest a sizable chunk of money into a new hire. The NFL spends millions of dollars on first round draft picks. Given the investment, they need all the information they can get about players’ physical and mental skills. The Wonderlic delivers that value. It’s the only cognitive measure used by the NFL, and players’ Wonderlic scores can determine where they end up in the draft and which players get the million dollar salaries.

    “Selecting a new quarterback is like hiring a president for a company,” Callans says. “They need the intelligence to think on their feet, evaluate all of their options and understand the impact their actions will have on the outcome of the game.”

Wonderlic helps team owners make the best selections by identifying which players have the mental strength to lead their team to victory.

    “History shows that the brighter a person is, the more likely he is to be successful,” Callans says. “Whether they are on a football field or in a boardroom, smarter people are resourceful and they don’t make a lot of mistakes.”

    For the NFL, years of testing shows that the higher a player scores on the Wonderlic, the more likely he is to be in the starting lineup—for any position. “There is no other reasonable explanation for the difference in test scores between starting players and those that sit on the bench,” Callans says. “Intelligence plays a role in how well they play the game.”

    That lesson translates well for corporate use. “Whether you are hiring a mailroom clerk or a CEO, a defensive lineman or a quarterback, intelligence is an accurate determiner of success,“ Callans says. “Smart people achieve more, they are better leaders, and they add greater value to the company.”

Unlike soccer, American football – like rugby football -- used hands as much as feet and thus did not require the mixed-footedness that is so helpful in soccer but tends to be associated with low IQ.


Though Whites continued to invite trouble by failing to shoot Black rioters in burning Baltimore and to close the Muslim boat-building enterprises around the Mediterranean, the results of the 2015 World Happiness Report came in – and 98%-White Switzerland came top (Yahoo! Health, 24 iv). The report was based on data from 158 countries with regard to six factors: GDP per capita, absence of corruption, generosity, social support, freedom, and healthy life expectancy. The report was released by the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

The inhabitants of the 10 happiest countries were (or had been) overwhelmingly European:

1.       Switzerland

2.       Iceland

3.       Denmark

4.       Norway

5.       Canada

6.       Finland

7.       The Netherlands

8.      Sweden

9.       New Zealand

10.     Australia

 The bottom 10 countries in the ranking were in Africa or the Muslim-dominated Middle East

Amusingly, the happiness of White countries could not be attributed simply to years of successful imperialism and plundering of A/A areas: the most happy (White) countries had not engaged in much plunder in recent centuries, and the least happy (A/A) countries were not those which had been notably invaded or pillaged by Whites.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 27, 2015


Echoing the latest news of African upheavals (q.v. – Mediterranean, Durban), ‘right-wing’ Mail columnist Peter Hitchens drew attention to how Colonel Gaddafi had once warned Europe of what the future held. But even PH admitted he dared not {for fear of upsetting his journalistic colleagues or editor?} repeat the full extent of Gadawfu’s anxieties Thankfully, these had been indicated in the Sunday Express (4 ix 2010):

"In his farewell speech in Rome, the 67-year-old dictator said: “Italy needs to convince her European allies to accept this Libyan proposal: five billion euros to Libya to stop illegal immigration. Europe runs the risk of turning black from illegal immigration; it could turn into Africa.

“We need support from the European Union to stop this army trying to get across from Libya, which is their entry point. At the moment there is a dangerous level of immigration from Africa into Europe and we don’t know what will happen.

“What w)ill be the reaction of the white Christian Europeans to this mass of hungry uneducated Africans?

“We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and cohesive continent or if it will be destroyed by this barbarian invasion. We have to imagine that this could happen, but before it does we need to work together.”


An invigoration of the UK’s madcap General Election beckoned as long-delayed non-peecee thinking was plainly required by the dramatic escalation of the A/A invasion of Europe (itself triggered by the West’s disastrous idealism in its ill-considered fomentation of the ‘Arab Spring’). Predictably, White politicos, bishops and humanitarian relief artists were at first tongue-tied by their delusional egalitarianism and mesmerized by the USA’s failure over forty years to shield itself from the South American tide that would make North America majority-Spanish by 2050.

But Ukip’s leader Nigel Farage (after partly blaming PM Daft Dave and President Shorty Sarkozy for the mess) did manage to squeak out that the saints* of the Med should be towed back whence they came; so ideas of creating a few well-run colonies could not be far behind -- funded by Nigerian petrodollars (in return for weaponry with which to fight Boko Haram), staffed by Chinese (in return for minerals) and providing a refuge for discontented A/As.

    A/As themselves could be pretty straightforward about what was needed. Bayin Keflemekal, a 30-year-old Eritrean nurse, told the Guardian (20 iv) that the brutality of the dictatorship at home, and the failure of neighbouring countries and international organisations to provide Eritreans with a safe haven, would continue to drive his countrymen to make the same trip. “If the government won’t help us, if UNHCR won’t help us, if no one can help us, then the only option is to go to the smugglers,” said Keflemekal.

And, in the absence of the West re-supplying colonization,** traffickers were happy to continue their service: said one Ahmed as he smilingly drank coffee in Mediterranean sunshine on the day after 800 drowned, “We go to extreme lengths to make the trip worthwhile and with as little tragedy as possible.”

* Camp of the Saints was available on Amazon. – Quite brave of them! A 2011 comment at Amazon: “If any intelligent person were to ask me to recommend two novels written in my lifetime (1943 on to now), I would without hesitation suggest Orwell's 1984 and this book by Raspail. Orwell was right. Raspail was right. If you don't believe Raspail, come to Miami, where I live. The number of Latin American and West Indian immigrants living in Miami in 1943 was less than 1 per cent. Today the number is 90 per cent.

I was lucky to have chosen Spanish to study when I was 12, because that is now the dominant language here. The whole city has been turned into one vast slum in which not one word of English is spoken. This is not a rant, it is a simple statement of facts.

Yes, I know, only a "racist" would mention such facts even if they are true. And that is ultimately Raspail's point, that everyone who objects to a relatively sudden tidal wave of immigrants is silenced by the accusation of "racism." I have lived this novel, I have seen it with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears.”

** Egypt could provide an obvious location – under its new dictator Abdel Fattah el-Sisi a natural centre for refugees from Muslim/alQueerdo persecution and needing the investment that a grateful pro-Western Nigeria would supply and the copious slave labour available from Eritrea, Syria and probably soon Libya....

Such a policy would be similar to Australian PM Tony Abbott’s naval ring of steel which redirected would-be migrants (e.g. from Indonesia’s 13K islands) away from Oz (to other islands having rudimentary facilities but at least preventing any boat people drowning in 18 months of the policy).

The policy may seem short on idealism, but it is a model of moderation compared to the allusion of the Sun’s Katie Hopkins (q.v.) to the possibility of sending helicopter gunships to deal with the “cockroaches” of the Med – a reference yielding a predictable crop of complaints from the United Nations, Black lawyers etc.


Britain’s star chess champion, Nigel Short, 49, explained the 49-1 under-representation of women among world grandmasters as being due to their relatively poor “logical thinking.” Responding to the challenge, chessmistresses said Short’s “sexism” showed at least that men were no more intelligent than women; but Short rejoined that the response lacked logic since he had only referred to special “hard-wired” abilities – just as women had more “emotional intelligence” and men were better at parking cars (Daily Mail, 20 iv; Daily Telegraph, 20 iv).

{Whether NS was aware of the greater range of male IQs helping explain the achievement difference, or of legendarily greater male ‘field independence’ [linked to powers of analysis, rationality and deduction -- TgF, Chap 1], was unknown.}


The recent MIT/Harvard research linking parental affluence and child grey brain matter (reported by Kim Noble – q.v.)  did not show or even look for a causal effect of income on brain anatomy, recorded Bioscience Technology (17 iv): contrary to the excited reports in most papers, “This study did not explore possible reasons for these differences in brain anatomy.”


 Though Jews had been the inventors and first supporters of multiculturalism, by 2014 Jews themselves, though comprising only 2% of America’s population, were the victims, according to FBI statistics, of over 60% of all hate crimes committed in the U.S. (Freedom Center, 21 iv). Yes, even in America, which had relatively few Muslims and many Jews, the left had ditched its first favoured minority in favour of a much less literate and civilized minority whose pals beheaded Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Kurds and each other in the Middle East but who commanded a fast-growing share of votes.


Thanks to the authorities of Tennessee, American Renaissance held a nice two-day conference of its polite be-suited middle-aged men of race-realistic persuasion.

 For better or worse, the 200 attending did not trouble themselves with the Hispanic takeover of the USA, the Muslim takeover of Europe or the low-IQ/low-literacy takeover of the West’s public institutions; nor did they conspicuously count America’s blessings in being a vast country in which apartheid could largely reign, assisted by the ready availability of guns.

Perhaps this was as good as it got, and only Europe would have to seek Russian help in keeping the third world at bay? But the lack of consideration of how PeeCee might be replaced by a more jovial religion did not disturb the conferencers as they properly celebrated the pathetically non-curvaceous appearance and conspicuous lack of diversity of their rivals of the Southern Poverty Law Center (below).


 As the cavalier mass killings of a thousand A/As by Mediterranean people traffickers forced immigration into the consciousness of Euroland’s purblind leaders – so much so that they planned to fly to somewhere nice in Switzerland for a dinner about it – Ukip’s Nigel Farage said Britain should only admit Christian boat people (and let the Royal Navy tow the Med’s A/As to the kindly mercies of their fellow Solunnis and Shitites in seaworthy vessels supplied by UK taxpayers) (Politics, 22 iv).

 He was quickly joined by others in his party, one of whom, Peter Endean, who was standing for Ukip in Plymouth, re-tweeted an image of rescued migrants with the caption: "Labour's new floating voters. Coming to a country near you soon." ‘Asylum seekers’ were arriving across the Med at a rate of five hundred per day plus corpses; and ‘humanitarian’ caterwauling crescendoed in multiculti-propagandized Europe to bring in every wretched victim of A/A barbarism that pie-eyed charities could discover* and bring to the attention of traitorous politicos.

A handy summary of the situation and of the need to stop the miserable trade by knocking out the ‘boat’-building that had become the key economic activity of north-east Africa was provided at ‘See migration for what it is – invasion.’ Boat-busting by the 28 nations of Euroland should take just a couple of days of bi-plane activity – though EUSSR leaders would first need the usual diet of dinners and high-jinks for themselves and their retinues.

* The United Nations’ “special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants,” François Crépau, not content with saying the West should take in millions from zones of war, civil war, jihadist beheadings, Muesli mayhem etc, also defended “economic migrants”, many of whom sought to come to Europe from sub-Saharan Africa.

They were “people who may not be in need of protection but are desperate for a future because there’s no job for them anywhere near their country,” said Crépau (Guardian, 23 iv), articulating the pious aspirations of Western elites (themselves protected in their leafy suburbs and palatial ghettoes from the less salubrious features of mass immigration). {Just why the poor and wretched of the A/A world did not seek refuge in Saudi, Egypt, Nigeria or Brazil was too impolitic to ask}


The extent and funding of Muesli power-grabbing in Britain was exposed as the election to mayoralty in Tower Hamlets [aka Bow], east London, of Bangladeshi Luftur Rahman  was declared invalid by the Electoral Commission due to LR’s use of bribery, personation and intimidation – all covered by his alleging ‘racism’ against any who challenged him.

The £1M cost of the trial fell largely on taxpayers, but LR himself would have to fork out at least £250K and he was banned from subsequent candidacy; though he had enjoyed the support of leading leftist Ken Livingstone and the President of the Trade Union Congress, he was under consideration for criminal charges from the Metropolitan Police (which had itself been bizarrely slow to act) (Daily Mail, 23 iv). LR had sent threats to voters’ mobile phones (and even of death to children of competitors), had faked postal ballots, had an army of deceased persons registered as ‘ghost’ voters, and had unlawfully persuaded mosques to make proclamations backing his campaign.

    The Commission declared: “By setting out to break the rules and going to extraordinary lengths to win last May's mayoral election, Lutfur Rahman and his allies robbed the people of Tower Hamlets of the free and fair election they deserved and betrayed everyone in our community who trusted and voted for him.” The judge added that the case “starkly demonstrated what happens when those in authority are afraid to confront wrongdoing for fear of allegations of racism and Islamophobia”; and he warned of “postal voting factories” and thousands of ballots being sold across Britain.

He noticed that when there was not even the slightest justification for an accusation of racism, Rahman and his cronies would accuse their opponents of “dog-whistle politics” instead. By these means, anything and everything an opponent said could be turned into coded racism, even when the racism was only in the mind of the accuser (Observer, 26 iv).

    LR had been Britain’s first Muslim mayor – in office in Tower Hamlets from 2010. One of Mr Rahman's aides, Alibor Choudhury, was also found guilty of corrupt and illegal practices.

    The Telegraph, which (24 iv, backing its star newshound Andrew Gilligan) had taken the lead in exposing Left/Muesli corruption, reckoned LR’s fraudulence the tip of an iceberg and opined “Rotten boroughs still exist in modern Britain – and they are often dominated by the Left.  . . . .Political correctness. . . .has facilitated injustice.  . . . .[There has been] devastating institutional failure.”

    {This blog’s London correspondent wrote: “Tower Hamlets is the perfect example of  the way immigrants acting en masse try to place themselves above the law and the craven refusal of the authorities to act against clear abuses by ethnic/racial minorities in Britain. The result of the reluctance of those in authority to prevent ethnic/racial minorities from engaging in criminal behaviour is an ever-growing arrogance and ambition of  such groups to create enclaves within England (and to a lesser extent the rest of Britain) which are effectively foreign settlements.

This behaviour is particularly pronounced in areas dominated by Muslims. It is not that difficult to foresee a time in the not too distant future when areas such as Tower Hamlets are so much under the control of  Muslims that Sharia law, de facto or official, will be applied within the dominated area.}


Enlivening the UK’s uninspired* (yet still baffling) General Election campaigning, PM Daft Dave relieved himself on air of verbal support for footie club West Ham – an amazing mistake [he called it a “brain fade”] given that only weeks earlier he had announced himself to be an Aston Villa fan.**

Similarly economical with the truth was Labour’s Red Ed Mililitre who blamed Cameron “in part” for the drowned boat people in the Med – without mentioning the boat builders, the people smugglers, the illegal migrants themselves, the failure of the EU to patrol its borders and his and his own party’s support for the overthrow of Libya’s Col. Gadawfu which had led to that country’s being bombed by France and Britain (with American hardware) and disintegrating into warring tribal factions.

For her part, SNP leader Scotweiler Sturgeon said the timing of any further referendum on breaking up Yukay would be a matter of her “gut feeling”, then ‘clarified’ this as meaning “of what the Scottish people want” (D. Telegraph, 25 iv, p.1).

*Except in Bonnie Jockland, where the Glasgow Irish – no longer loyal to their paedophile priests -- had come into keen agreement that the Clottish Nastyalist Party could extract more money from Westminster than Scottish Labour had ever managed. Because of PeeCee, racial and ethnic differences were generally unmentionable – especially being White, Black, Jewish, Pakistani or English; but it was OK to be Scottish, proud, anti-English chauvinist and skint.

**Cameron subsequently told reporters (Observer, 26 iv): “I had what [Green leader] Natalie Bennett described as a brain fade [when she could not calculate the cost of her housing programme]. I’m a Villa fan… I must have been overcome by something… this morning. But there we are, these things sometimes happen when you are on the stump.” But former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan, an Arsenal fan, prophesied: “This has to cost Cameron the election, surely? How can anyone ‘forget’ which football team they support?”


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 20, 2015


For the centenary of the beginning (24 iv 1915) of the Ottoman Turks ravishing the world’s first officially Christian state, Armenia, killing 1.5M and driving further millions to flight (especially to Russia and the USA), the Pope celebrated mass in the Armenian rite and told assembled Armenian bishops in the Sistine Chapel that what had happened to their countrymen across  the closing years of WWI had indeed been what many Christian leaders and writers* and some twenty countries had long claimed: the modern world’s first genocide** (assisted by gas chambers imported from Germany).

Armenia, in 2015 a landlocked country of just 3M, also received a visit from the famous Armenian-grandfathered Californian ‘reality TV’ starlet and lingerie model, the dazzlingly derrièred Kim Kardashian (Guardian, 13 iv).

Armenians had long been better known for their intellectual (e.g. chess-playing), businesslike and conservative tendencies. The Thames Advertiser of 6 vi 1877 said they were not much good as mere “workmen”; but it recalled the Turkish adage that ‘It takes two Turks to swindle a Greek, two Greeks to swindle a Jew, and two Jews to swindle an Armenian.’

Still, whatever the Armenian virtuosities, they were likely to become better known thanks to KK. The only country actively supporting Armenia was Russia, which maintained a military base in the north of the mountainous country to protect it from its Muslim neighbours (Turkey, Iran and Azerbaijan).

* Simon Heffer, International Business Times, 13 iv 2015:
It is well documented that the Ottoman government released brutal criminals from prison in late 1914 especially to form squads to go into Armenian territory and slaughter those who lived there. The trained killers were told the Armenians had collaborated with the Russians to defeat Turkey.

Armenian intellectuals were rounded up and tortured before being executed – the extraction of toenails and fingernails followed by blinding was commonplace. There were mass deportations, killings and forced starvation. Thousands of bodies were dumped in ravines and live infants were thrown on to rocks. It was as if Hitler found this template.

** ‘Genocide’ is the killing of accessible members of a human group having characteristics believed not readily alterable. Raphael Lemkin, in his work Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (1944), coined the term "genocide" by combining Greek genos (γένος), "race, people" and Latin cīdere "to kill".

{Thus the term should strictly not be used by postmodern leftists – since they do not believe in the existence of races....}

Large-scale genocides of the twentieth century were conducted by the Nazis, Pol Pot’s communists and the Rwandans. Substantial proportions of Sunnis and perhaps Shi-ites in the Arabian/African world favour genocide of Jews and perhaps of Christians, Kurds, Yazidis and each other. Turks maintain their 1915-22 killing, hounding and torturing of Armenians were reciprocal acts of war.


The Italian navy announced that, as its latest contribution to the Muslim invasion of Europe ooops to humanitarian compassion and unburdening of Eurotaxpayers’ pots of gold, it had rescued some 10K African/Arabians ‘in trouble’ on the Mediterranean in the course of just 5 days (BBC Radio4, 13 iv, 14:00; Guardian, 14 iv). Despite rescue efforts, one boat alone, as it sank, consigned 400 A/As to a watery grave when they spotted a commercial ship and all surged to one side in hope of being the first to be rescued.

Traffickers sometime fired on rescue vessels so as to reclaim the boats from which they had dumped their human cargo. More commonly, they telephoned the Italians to provide precise details of where they would sink their charges. In cases where their boats were clapped out, they would send them heading for Italy without sufficient fuel for a return journey.

Sometimes they left their boats, sending them on autopilot towards the Italian coast. Asylum seekers also poured into the E.U. via Bulgaria at the rate of 500 per day.

{Even such tactics as unloading Mueslis into the drink had become increasingly favoured by people-smugglers of the Mediterranean as a way of getting their charges past Euroland’s border ‘controls.’ A/As typically waited in heinous conditions for a month in Libya for their chance to board a leaky rustbucket and get picked up by Whitey. Naturally, there had not been much of a word out of Euroland’s peecee ‘politicians’ and MSM – with commentators in Britain sticking close to their country’s madcap yet still boring General Election. It was as if Camp of the Saints (q.v.; 1973) had never been written. Certainly it had not been read by those who were going to have to cope with the invasion.}

    Eventually UNHCR, Amnesty, Médecins sans Frontières, Save the Children etc. intervened to demand the EU revise the policy of rescue for which 22 of its 28 members had voted – though of course the super-humanitarians actually wanted to increase the numbers of A/As getting to the West. MSF actually announced it was hiring its own speedboat to assist would-be immigrants.

Germany had stopped returning migrants to their landing points in Greece and Italy – apparently it wanted more slave labour. {Amusingly, A/As and Western lefties had long sought an end to colonial rule. Now, in 2015, they A/As their lives and limbs and their families’ fortunes to live within Whitey’s warm embrace.}


 Though scorned by card-carrying leftists as depressive and drunken racists, White mercenaries from South Africa turned out to be the most effective defence against Nigeria’s ‘Boko Haram’ ([Western] Education is Forbidden) Mueslis who had – according to UNICEF -- got some 800K Black children (some as young as 4) on the run from village to village to avoid death, amputations, repeated rape and slavery (Guardian, 14 iv).

Though the mercenaries tended to be elderly remnants of SA’s apartheid regime, they maintained good relations with the Black soldiers under them and were much admired for their professionalism in flushing out and despatching Black terrorists – the job for which apartheid had selected and trained them. They needed payment from oil-rich Nigeria since they and their families faced unemployment and prosecution back in what they called ‘racist’ Black SA.


 Nine school officials in Atlanta, Georgia, were sentenced to prison following convictions for participating in an exam score-boosting scandal (BBC News [US & Canada], 15 iv). All were Black, like their pupils – as far as published pictures showed (for MSM was under a self-denying ordinance not to mention Blackness in association with naughtiness).

Judge Jerry Baxter called the case "the sickest thing that's ever happened in this town". Three of the educationists convicted received 20-year sentences, far harsher than the penalties asked for by the state – reflecting the court’s disgust at rank dishonesty on the part of publicly paid teachers.

Evidence of cheating to help retain school grants by suggesting teaching had improved backward children (as required by peecee politicos) was uncovered at 44 schools, with nearly 180 officials involved. The state-led investigation shocked Atlanta when it discovered that officials at the city-run schools had encouraged teachers to change students' answers in order to feign educational progress.

Those given 20-year sentences would serve 7 years behind bars and 13 years on probation. Protesters against the sentences gathered at a Baptist church to seek revenge.


Despite the contributions of evolutionary scientists Richard Dawkins, Bruce Lahn, Satoshi Kanazawa and Nicholas Wade (q.v.) to backing London School postulation of deep-seated race differences in intelligence, fond argument persisted in the form of a London [Hornsey] Marxist’s Black Brain, White Brain (Gavin Evans, 2015, Thistle Press).

Unfortunately, the particular points made by this anti-apartheid activist, lately ‘teaching at Birkbeck College,’ were trivial (a few cave paintings in Durban, a claim of IQ involving a “network” of genetic factors [cf. TgF Chap 3], some IQ differences in widely separated twins [known to Burt by 1950], and IQ rises [hotly disputed – TgF Chap 4]); but the effort provided an up-to-date reminder of hereditarian thinking while offering amusement by its singular failure to take on the central claims and evidence of race realists from Jensen and Eysenck onwards.


  Though the principal beneficiaries of two generations of Western fawning on  ‘cultural’ minorities, Muslim Arabs spectacularly upped their blood-lusty ways of C21 by tossing at least twelve African Christians to their deaths in the Mediterranean as fights over religion broke out on boats taking invaders to Shangri-la multiculti Europe which would not even beat the twenty perpetrators which the Italian borderwallahs managed to arrest; and, in Durban and Johannesburg [in the ‘Rainbow Nation’], busloads of Zulus obeyed their King Goodwill Zwelithini, who had called foreigners “lice” and said they should “pack their bags and go,” in killing six Blacks from other African countries, injuring 300 other foreigners, fighting with police,* smashing up shops (some of them Chinese) and putting 5K targets of their xenophobia to flight (BBC World Service, 17 iv, 14:10).

Asking foreigners to leave (Daily Mail, 17 iv, ‘South Africa descends to a new apartheid’)

 {As with ‘genocide’ (q.v.), talk of ‘xenophobia’ carried the implication of there being distinct groups whose differences involved identity and were tribal or racial in nature....}

* Riot police charged gangs of looters — and the Congolese, Mozambican and Zimbabwean nationals standing up to them — with guns, tear gas, water cannons that fired blue ink and stun grenades. Taking aim from around street corners, spraying rubber bullets and arresting 74 members of a machete-waving crowd, they managed to push back the battle lines a street at a time.


Though the g factor and intelligence itself had become scarcely mentionable in the peecee West (and certainly not by cognibabblers), Chinese academics remained more traditional and, when Wuhan Institute of Bioengineering came to light as having built a mile-long imitation of the Great Wall of China as a tourist attraction, one Weibo user complained, “I can’t believe a university has such a low IQ” (Daily Telegraph, 17 iv).


 France would blow a new Є100M over three years to impress and occupy anti-racists, said French (but Spanish-born) PM Manuel Valls (Guardian, 18 iv). The lolly would be spent on fast-tracking homophobes etc through the criminal justice system for retribution, on internet high jinks (‘social media’) and on getting schoolchildren to snitch to teachers on overheard racist jokes and generalizations.


 The tyrants of Britain’s Home Office, Crown Persecution Service and the Conservative Party (and hangers-on) were slapped down by London juries which declined to convict so many scribblers of corrupting police that the CPS dropped all its remaining 20 prosecutions. Sun hacks had rewarded cops who had come forward with suppressed stories, e.g. of a schoolchild being attacked in a London classroom by a fox – an attack deemed unreportable lest Greens be upset.

Wanting revenge on journalists for their exposure of parliamentary expense fiddles and Sir Oswald Mosley’s sexual predilections for Nazi-themed bondage, the powers-that-be mounted an attack which involved dawn raids, years on bail, the closure of the News of the World and a £50M bill for taxpayers and the frivolously accused.

But juries at the Central Criminal Court, the ‘Old Bailey,’ – to which the CPS had thought fit to proceed with such trivia – thought the press rewards to (admittedly insubordinate) bobbies did not reach any standard of criminality given that they were plainly in the public interest and what the public would have wanted.

So there was still the occasional chink of light despite HMG and its minions moving heaven and earth to suppress free speech and criticism of the po-faced and peecee mighty. Thanks to juries, the four years of the CPS hounding 29 journalists with its ‘Operation Elveden’ had yielded only 2 convictions (Guardian, 18 iv).

    A further exposure of prosecution mania – this time driven by shrieking feminoidism – was provided as another London jury, at Blackfriars Crown Court, cleared a 34-yr-old graduate, technical co-ordinator Adam Leheup, of ‘raping’ a 25-yr-old woman. The pair had met through a dating app on the internet, got through two bottles of wine at a bijou bar on the Embankment, proceeded to the woman’s flat in Camden in the small hours of the morning, canoodled and undressed for massage, when penetration occurred, then fallen asleep after the woman asked to stop.

The jury was unimpressed by the woman apparently having said ‘No!’ at various points through the hours of intimacy, preferring to accept Leheup’s account that she had been pleasantly responsive and confirmed his experience that “Girls say no but they don’t mean it.” Leheup certainly had a claim to experience since, when meeting the 25-yr-old, he was wooing no less than 35 women online and having regular sex with six of them.

    The tyrannical (female-led) CPS had also found itself berated by a (female) Warwickshire Crown Court judge when she had to handle a charge of ‘rape’ against an 18-yr-old male who, when 17, had had sex with a drunken girl in a car park. The girl was 15 at the time, but within weeks of her 16th birthday; and CCTV footage showed she enjoyed the experience and went off together with the boy for a coffee afterwards. Awarding a conditional discharge, the judge said a case like this, of sex between teenagers, should never have been brought before a crown court.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 13, 2015


As White British distaste for third-world – and especially for gypsy and Muesli – immigration remained undiminished (with 60% of Whites thinking there was a ‘culture clash’, 15% voting UKIP, and even a few score risking turning out for a noisy Pegida [Patriotic Europeans against the Islamification of the West] confrontation with A-NL/UAF ‘anti-racists’ and anarchists in Whitehall, the Observer’s Kenan Malik provided the latest leftist account of what had gone wrong despite PeeCee’s take-over of the British establishment and suppression of virtually all dissent (5 iv).

Yes, the problems of multicultidom were to be blamed not on stupidity, criminality, hysteria or psychoticism but on Western authorities themselves:

".... [following] the influential 2000 Parekh report on multiculturalism, the authorities attempted to manage diversity by putting people into particular ethnic and cultural boxes, defining individual needs by virtue of the boxes into which people were put, and using those boxes to shape public policy. They treated minority communities as if each were a distinct, homogenous whole, each composed of people all speaking with a single voice, each defined by a singular view of culture and faith. The most conservative figures often came to be accepted as the authentic voices of minority groups.

    The consequence has been to create a more parochial sense of identity. And for a small group of Muslims, tribalism has led them to find their identity and an authentic Islam in Islamism. The attraction of jihadism to some Muslims is an issue that needs confronting. But it does not reveal a problem with Muslim integration as such, or with too much immigration.

    The problem of is not one of too much immigration or diversity. It lies, rather, in the impact of the policies enacted to manage diversity."

That some 60% of third-world immigrants maintained their own religion, language, music, dress code, cuisine, drug regime, misogyny, authoritarianism and sex habits (including female circumcision and cousin marriage) without the slightest insistence or labelling by White “authorities” had evidently escaped KM’s attention.

Even more astonishingly, KM forgot that, since 9/11, Mueslis worldwide had provided televised evidence of the bloodthirstiness (not least towards each other) which had distinguished their religion since its inception. As Ayaan Hirsi Ali said, “"Violence in the name of religion is endemic in the Muslim world today, from Afghanistan to Tunisia, from Yemen to Syria and Iraq."


 Blowing Western multiculti illusions apart, the conquering Iran-backed Shitites of Iraq declined to make much distinction between the Sunnis of ISIS/Daesh and the Sunnis who just wanted a quiet life (Guardian, 5 iv). Sunnis who wanted to return to their homes in battle-scarred areas of Iraq were subjected to intrusive vetting at the hands of militias and security forces, and suffered regular discrimination from officials in Baghdad.

Said one Sunni: “The sheikhs who come to see me from Anbar tell me regularly of the abuse at checkpoints. It is insufferable.” In Baghdad’s Sunni enclave of Adhamiyeh, Sheikh Mustafa, an imam in the Abu Hanefah mosque (a central institution of Sunni learning in Iraq) said discrimination against Sunni residents and refugees was now a “very big problem”. “No [Sunni new arrival] can now live in Baghdad without a guarantor,” he said. “And that guarantor must say that this person is not a member of Daesh [Isis]. We cannot let this get out of control here. If another sectarian war is going to happen, Baghdad will be a pool of blood.”

American academic Juan Cole told the Guardian: “Arabs today are like brothers and enemies at the same time. Each subgroup brandishes its religious or ethnic identity to confront the other subgroup in a futile war, in which all will lose … In short, the fall of Arabism as a unifying identity will mark the start of a series of civil wars among brothers. And once those wars start, nobody knows when or how they will end.”

Meantime, the West continued with its knickers in a twist, bombing to help Shitites in Iraq and arming Saudi Solunnis to fight Shitites in Yemen.


 While Mueslis mounted orgies of killing and destruction in their own lands (Iraq, Syria and Yemen being the latest) and orgies of pimping White teenies in the British Midlands, all funded by Western aid and welfare (since the poor Arabs had money only for guns and tanks....), UK politicos continued to take their ease – not closing a single mosque, cancelling a single traitor’s citizenship or demanding the speaking of English, and actually hob-nobbing with the Islamofascists of ‘MEND’ [‘Muslims for Engagement and Development’] who offered for a fee or somesuch to swing parliamentary elections in Muesli areas of London and Bradford (Sunday Telegraph, 5 iv, Andrew Gilligan).

MEND reckoned it could deliver some twenty seats to selected candidates as a result of Muesli ghettoes concentrating votes. Building a block of Muesli MPs would be further assisted by the standard practice of the BBC using its vast compulsory licence fee income to denounce critics of the Muesli take-over of Britain as ‘racist.’


Blogstar Sun-signed and Oz-bound Katie Hopkins (q.v.), who had criticized the sexual shenanigans of Britain’s Pakistanis, urged keeping dry eyes about Alzheimers, to which she said she would find suicide preferable (Daily Telegraph, 8 iv). After all, she queried, what was the point of continuing one’s life if one did not know one was living it?


 As the followers of The Prophet continued to disgrace themselves by their disgusting murderous brutality in Arabia, the big players Saudi, Turkey and Egypt had top-level discussions. Yet despite these Solunnis agreeing with the Shitites of Iran and Iraq that the over-enthusiastic psychopaths of ISIS had to be squashed, uncertainty and carnage lay ahead for years. The Week, 4 iv:

"A lot of the Gulf countries feel they are being thrown under the bus," said Mishaal Al Gergawi, a commentator in the United Arab Emirates. Saudi King Salman recently met with the presidents of Egypt and Turkey, the two Sunni states with the most military muscle, to discuss uniting against the Iranian threat. The new Great Game, it appears, has just begun — and years of chaos and violent conflict appear inevitable."

In the 20th century, each state had its ‘one-man show,'" said Uzi Rabi, an expert on the region at Tel Aviv University. "We are on a journey to an unknown chapter in the Middle East.''


 Sex offending is written in the genes, an unprecedented study showed, with the brothers and fathers of men convicted of sex crimes being almost five times more likely to commit a rape or sexual assault than ordinary men of similar age and family relationships (Daily Telegraph, 9 iv, Sarah Knapton [Science Editor]; Internat.J.Epidemiology, 9 iv). Researchers at Oxford University and the Karolinska Institute in Sweden said around 40 per cent of the risk of committing a sex crime was straightforwardly genetic, with the remaining 60 per cent down to personal factors [‘unshared’—e.g. birth order, individual appearance, choice of friends] and environmental factors [such as being abused as a child, upbringing, wealth and education].

Said Professor Seena Fazel, of Oxford University’s Department of Psychiatry, “What we have found is high-quality evidence from a large population study that genetic factors have a substantial influence on an increased risk of being convicted of sexual offences.”

The study analysed data from all 21,566 men convicted for sex crimes in Sweden between 1973 and 2009. Being only a paternal half-brother of a sex criminal – so the two did not usually live together -- did little to decrease either risk (from the rate of 0.5% among men in the general population) or similarity with half-siblings. The researchers suggested that genes linked to increased impulsivity, egotism and decreased intellectual ability could be responsible.

    The idea that sexual offending tends to be clustered in families was not new, but typically had been put down to a “cycle of abuse” -- an idea that had probably been given too much weight, the authors argued. Instead, they said, the similarity between relatives was mostly explained by genetics (Guardian, 9 iv).

    In February it had emerged that Jimmy Savile’s brother Jonny had also molested women at a mental health home.

    {For distinction between genetic effects that are straightforwardly additive, multiplicative [epistatic], environmentally interactive and environmentally covariational, see TgF Chapter 3.}


A new but little remarked inspection time estimate, using the exposure time needed for a subject to identify a colour, turned out to have yielded a substantial correlation with IQ – even in a study of Belfast university students having an average IQ of 114 and a restricted IQ range [standard deviation] of 8: C. McCrory, C. Cooper, Overlap between visual inspection time tasks and general intelligence, Learning and Individual Differences 17 (2007) 187–192; Elsevier. The authors’ summary follows.

"The stimulus display duration required for subjects to accurately compare the length of two line lengths (known as Inspection Time: IT), reliably correlates around 0.5 with general intelligence. It is not clear, however, if this correlation reflects general “speed  of processing”, or some other element of the task. There is a consequent need for new experimental paradigms. We describe a novel IT task where participants viewed a sequence of eight briefly-presented coincident coloured circles, the first of which was presented for a variable duration. Participants reported the colour of the first circle. The threshold for perceiving this colour correlated 0.37 and 0.38 (pb0.05) with two conventional IT tasks within a sample of 75 students. It also correlated significantly with scores on a timed measure of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (r= −0.39, p<0 .01="" p="">
{Traditionally, correlations between IT and IQ are higher in subjects of mediocre and lower intelligence -- TgF Chapter 2. And the present authors’ low range of their bright subjects would have further limited the extent of their correlation. So this study provides good confirmation of the generallity of the IT-IQ relation – and thus of the key involvement of ‘speed of intake’ in intelligence.}


‘Revolutionary’ France which had given house-room to 7M Mueslis from whom it had endured welfare demands, nightly car burnings, the murder of journalists and Jews and constant threats to its soldiery, found that even its supply to ISIS of 50% of the West-dwelling Mahometans who had gone to Syria to back jihad was not enough to dissuade fun-loving fanatics from closing down its Paris-based World Service [TV5M] broadcasting for a day and e.g. replacing scheduled programmes with caliphate propaganda (Daily Mail, 10 iv).

{Still, British politicos continued to rest in their beds ooops busy theselves with a general election campaign involving no parliamentary-style debating, no established facts, no jokes and certainly no mention of any foreign country or of the hundreds of A/As crossing the Mediterraean daily to get into Western Europe. What studied insouciance ooops PeeCee!}


 Two of Denmark’s major political parties, the Social Democrats and the Danish People’s Party, started a pre-election race by competing to have the toughest stance on immigration and asylum issues (AmRen, 7 iv). Large posters of a smiling PM Thorning-Schmidt (SD) addressing all newcomers with the words “If you come to Denmark, you should work” appeared, pasted along bike lanes and on buses all over the Copenhagen area.

Analysts said this message was in line with the SD’s traditional ethos of all contributing to society to the best of their abilities before claiming any entitlements. But the hard-line Danish DPP hit back with a demand that asylum seekers in Denmark should only be granted ‘family re-union’ (to bring in illiterate A/A first-cousin arranged wives) once after being granted permanent residency in Denmark (i.e. after 5 years).


Interviewed about his new book Magna Carta, Britain’s top BBC-presentable ‘right-wing’ constitutional historian, the council-house-born, homosexual and doubly club-footed David Starkey, 70, was happy to ponder on questions of ability (Daily Telegraph, 11 iv) – though without mentioning the 110-year old g factor which Spearman and Burt had discovered.

On ‘geek’ Hampstead-dwelling Labour leader Red Ed Mililitre:
“Miliband is a man of high ambition and low talent – the worst possible combination. His whole language at the moment is ‘soak the rich, hate the rich.’ It’s snide, it’s mean-spirited and, of course, it defies the truth that economies depend on the intelligent, the entrepreneurial, those who were created with money. One may not like it, one may disapprove of it, but all the nice things that we want come essentially from their abilities.”

On race and racism: “The term ‘racist’ has become totally without meaning. I think there are cultural differences, there are all sorts of differences. It’s very odd, isn’t it? We’re on the one hand told there are no genetic differences between races and yet on the other hand it is very striking how different -- more or less -- racial groups seem to perform athletically, intellectually, commercially, whatever. Who knows? I don’t know. I’m not a geneticist.”

On wymmin: “I just recognise gender differences. We are biologically different, and in many ways we’re emotionally different. Of course we are. And it’s rather a good thing. There’s overwhelming psychological evidence. It’s not for nothing that on the whole women have not been soldiers. The genders are different. And the whole thing is not just the result of wicked gender grooming. It’s not simply societal. It is the result of biology.

Obviously. I think that the evidence suggests that there are different distributions of intelligence between men and women -- that women tend to cluster more around the mean, men are either very, very bright or very thick.”

Top statesman, Singapore leader Lee Kuan Yew (q.v.) had also picked up some London School ideas:

“The bell curve is a fact of life. The blacks on average score 85 per cent on IQ and it is accurate, nothing to do with culture. The whites score on average 100. Asians score more … the Bell Curve authors put it at least 10 points higher. These are realities that, if you do not accept them, will lead to frustration because you will be spending money on wrong assumptions and results cannot follow.”
– Lee Kuan Yew: The Man & His Ideas, 1997

{LKY resembled Enoch Powell (q.v.) in having won a double-starred First at Cambridge. Like David Starkey, LKY had graduated from Fitzwilliam College – set up in 1869 to help boys from poorer backgrounds. Starkey went on to become a Fellow of the college – his rise to distinction providing some justification for his view that people having mental and physical handicaps should not bellyache about being ‘victims.’}


 In a week when star BBC presenter Jeremy Paxman had queried why males should be over-represented 4-to-1 in teams of students coming forward to compete in the TV quiz ‘University Challenge’, the Boat Race(s) crews of (victorious) Oxford and (defeated) Cambridge showed the women rowers needing 2½ more minutes than the men to complete the Putney-to-Mortlake course. (For the first time, the male and female teams had raced on the Thames on the same day, with the same weather conditions and before the same crowd of cheering onlookers.)


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 06, 2015


After local Labour MP Simon Danczuk raised a Pakistani flag over Rochdale town hall as an act of ‘community cohesion’ in an area where eight Paks had been jailed for grooming, drugging, exploiting and prostituting White girls, the Sun’s columnist Katie Hopkins {see below} complained it was “outrageous” and promptly found herself reported to police by SD for “inciting racial hatred” (Guardian, 30 iii).

    The MP had proudly posted a photo of himself on Twitter with two men of Pakistani origin at the flag-raising ceremony. This infuriated Hopkins, who replied with a photograph of eight of the men convicted for offences connected to child exploitation. Above the image, she wrote: “Are these your friends too ‪@SimonDanczuk? Is this why you are raising the Pakistani flag in Rochdale? 77 years inside.”

Another post Danczuk reported to the police said: “Your Pakistani friends saw young white girls as fair game when they abused them. Do NOT lecture me on community cohesion, fool.”

A further tweet from KH said: “Raising a Pakistani flag in Rochdale is not helping community cohesion. It is inflammatory. ‪@SimonDanczuk you & your party disgust me.” But SD was prepared to use the multiculti left’s suppressive and punitive armoury even in a case where paedohysteria would usually have been required.

    A Guardian correspondent noted: The same people who call for someone who makes an insensitive remark to be arrested are the same people who support those who say burning poppies is a "right to free expression." I do not wish to silence any voice, whether of those who revel in being offended, who burn flags, or who draw cartoons. The moment someone is dragged away for something that they have said then the age of words has died and a new, more dangerous, era has started.


Not to be spared paedohysteria was the UK’s most spectacular twentieth-century politician, Enoch Powell (1912-1998),  whose wife, daughters, friends and race-realist supporters learned that Britain’s modern Cassandra had been denounced to police on a double-hearsay claim dating back to 1980 that he had once enjoyed a little ‘satanic child abuse.’ His biographer, Simon Heffer, recorded his own outrage both at the allegation and at its having been relayed by bishops of Enoch’s beloved Church of England (Daily Mail, 30 iii):

These post-Savile accusations bring to mind the hysteria surrounding allegations of satanic abuse in the late 1980s and early 1990s, including notorious cases in Rochdale and the Orkneys that involved social workers and police forcibly removing children from their homes in dawn raids {to ‘spare’ them from their sex- and witch-obsessed parents}.

This was not the first time that Powell had been treated by ‘liberal’-leftists to smears that were just too good to be false: in 1998, the BBC had claimed that the scourge of mass immigration had hypocritically visited the West Indies in 1953 to begin recruiting cheap Black labour for the NHS – a falsehood for which the Beeb eventually issued an apology.


 New claims for a causal effect of parental income on child intelligence issued from the leftist hotbed of  Columbia University (Guardian, 31 iii; Nature Neuroscience). The researchers, led by Professorette Kim Noble, scanned the brains of more than 1,000 children aged three to 20 years old and, “after taking genetic factors into account,” found that the surface area of the children’s cerebral cortex tended to larger as family income rose.

The surface area of the cerebral cortex was typically 6% larger in children from familes with an income greater than $150,000 (£101,000), when compared to families earning $25,000 (£17,000) or less.

{However, even if genetic factors had indeed been controlled for, a 6% extra brainpower seemed small beer for a 600% greater supply of parental cash. Prof. Kim planned to look next at causation by experimentally dishing taxpayer dollars randomly to lucky mothers.}  See also here


 High hopes entertained by environmentalistic idealists were dashed as ten employees of a recruitment company that aimed to get people back into work were proved to have fraudulently claimed nearly £300,000 from taxpayers (Guardian, 31 iii). The staff members – most having foreign names -- worked for Action 4 Employment (A4e), which was contracted by HMG to help people “from difficult backgrounds” gain the necessary training and skills.

The staff made up scores of files, forged signatures and falsely claimed they had helped 167 people find jobs, enabling the fraudsters to hit targets and get bonuses. Some staff even falsified documents, using the names of their own family members; while others offered bribes in the form of vouchers to get people to fill out bogus forms.

Sentencing began in criminal courts in Reading and Oxford. Altogether, A4E, which was headed until the fraud came to light by PM Daft Dave’s ‘back-to-work tsar,’ Emma Harrison, had lifted millions of pounds from the public purse. The crimes came to light as an A4E employee blew the whistle on the scam.

    At the same time, nursery places for infants were found to have no improving effect on educational level by age 5 or subsequently (Daily Telegraph, 31 iii – research by Institute for Fiscal Studies). £1B had been spent annually by Labour on ‘free’ nursery places – taking the percentage of infants registered from 37% to 88% across 1997-2007; but, despite fond hopes of achieving a ‘double dividend’ of improving school readiness and getting womyn out to work, only the latter objective was achieved

I remember my mother, the day that we met,
A thing I shall never entirely forget;
And I toy with the fancy that, young as I am,
I should know her again if we met in a tram.
But mother is happy in turning a crank
That increases the balance in somebody's bank;
And I feel satisfaction that mother is free
From the sinister task of attending to me.

                                      The Song of Education


 That mentions of the likely homosexuality (whether or not ‘repressed’) of GermanWings Airbus mass murderer Andreas Lubitz had to be handled with the utmost ‘sensitively’ (for fear of yag wrath) was indicated by their remaining minimal in MSM – and non-existent in the Guardian.

Instead of pursuing AL’s trawling of the dark side of the internet for gay porn, MSM preferred speculation that Lubitz suffered prolonged ‘depression,’ ‘burn-out,’ ‘retinal detachment,’ ‘suicidal tendencies,’ ‘obsessions,’ ‘psychopathy,’ ‘mania,’ ‘narcissism’ and ‘psychosomatic issues’ as well as bad reports of his temper from two on-off girlfriends (one of whom had somehow got pregnant).

By contrast, internetters freely explained that AL had been nicknamed ‘Tomato Andi’ by his fellow pilot-trainee colleagues from his preparatory months as a flight attendant; and that yags used ‘tomato’ for a presumed queer who was ‘fruit’ mistaken as a vegetable.


A joyous time of feel-good peace and harmony was arranged for Britain by HMG and MSM throughout Christianity’s great Festival by the simple expedients of ignoring all world problems (the agonies of Arabia, Africa, Ukraine etc. supposedly being the distant work of not-true-Muslims and Russian fascists, and emphatically not attributable to race-unrealistic Western interventions), emptying Parliament for five months, holding televised non-debates which ignored such topics as the transformation of the country into one of agrammatical, Cockney-accented, mumbling, iPad-addicted, tieless pseudo-graduates who lived on bankers’ casino gambling, low-wage immigration, ‘free’ elf care and borrowing – they hoped -- from the next generation that Paks, gyps and welfare-dependents would breed.

To fill the time, a General Election was scheduled for May 7 in which punters would vote in complete chaos as to whether they were selecting (or deselecting) a party, a PM, an MP, a UK or a EUSSR from multi-candidate lists in a first-past-the-post system.

Happily, the confusion was fuelled by Belgian chocolate, French nougat and by British-Empire hot cross buns being on sale for six weeks prior to Good Friday; and the pasta-scoffing Pope of homosexualised (though officially paedohysterical) Welfarianity was to provide inspiration for Britain’s fatties by slimming down his increasingly upholstered figure in line with his quacks’ requirements that he diet and exercise.

    With such tomfoolery to hand, the stultifying effect of PeeCee on British comedy and academia could be set aside, along with HMG having spent £50M prosecuting – unsuccessfully, thank heaven (juries refused to convict) – ten London journalists who had done nothing more than provide drinks and pocket money for officials who were all too willing to blab about their contacts with high heidjuns on the country’s merry-go-round.

Along with abolishing council housing, re-introducing payment for medical prescriptions and having all official business and schoolteaching conducted in English – moves which would, after lively discussion, solve Britain’s main voter-perceived problems of national bankruptcy, failing elf services and third-world immigration – killing off PeeCee would, by re-liberating Britain in the year of Magna Carta’s 800th anniversary, immediately improve the nation; but, a low-neuroticism folk, Brits would probably prefer the chaos that their electoral system was likely to multiply – a preference likely to persist so long as HMG and MSM provided a shield against reality-checking and the French managed to stop all but a handful of ISIL aficionados from crossing the Channel.

    Still, killing off the pseudo-religion of PeeCee probably could be done. Christianity might be a bit of a mixed bag despite having love trumping law at its centre: it was an accretion over hundreds of years of stories convenient to the Church and Constantine and even to the Jews themselves (eager to prove to the Romans that they had not demanded the crucifixion of an entirely innocent man – e.g. Ray/Brand 06).

But Christianity had something for everyone: equal rights for socialist improvers (‘consider the lily....’); stability and hierarchy for conservatives (‘render to Caesar....’); respect and nurturance for old and young; sex for heteros and homos (despite Church suppression of Jesus’ involvements with memory-storehouse girlfriend Mary and with next-to-naked boys, and its thousand-year discouragement of marriage itself; worship of the male firstborn allowed for women; and men allowed their most popular karaoke sentiment, ‘I did it my way,’ contemplating the tortures that Jesus (or his Judas-arranged stand-in) had suffered. Compared to such attractions and psychological insights, the illiberalism of boring PeeCee would surely not outrun the tyrannies of Hitler, Stalin and Mao.


  Showing more concern for the future of Christian civilization than did Election-besotted Brits, hundreds of Australians turned out in seven cities (especially Melbourne) to back the anti-Islamic ‘Reclaim Australia’ movement – an exercise involving shouting and spitting between them and supporters of ‘No Room for Racism,’ the two sides separated by mounted police (The Age [Victoria], 4 iv).


 Australia seemed likely to get its favourite glam model idol, Sun ‘trollumniste’ Katie Hopkins {q.v.},

 for several months as she took part in the country’s Celebrity Big Brother. KH had worked up a lucrative line for herself as a ‘controversial’ figure by poking fun at fatties and depressives; and her pointing {as above} to the links between Rochdale, child abuse and Pakistanis achieved more vindication as a ‘Briton’ caught on his way to Syria along with young children turned out to be the son of a Muslim Labour councillor for Rochdale (Guardian, 4 iv)


  The head-shaven Coalition minister and Conservative leader-in-waiting, Sajid Javid, a 46-yr-old banker who had risen via U.Exeter, condemned the unacceptable ‘culture’ of ‘a minority of Asians’ who treated women as third-class citizens – controlling them and knocking them about (Daily Telegraph, 4 iv); and added that “a misplaced sense of political correctness” had prevented police and social workers from “properly investigating” the drugging, raping and pimping of White teenies in his home town of Rochdale.

He said: “Some of the values that certain people in some communities have, in their attitudes to women or on the question of freedom of expression, are just totally unacceptable in British society, and we do no one any favours when we don’t investigate or talk about them.”

SJ had previously told the Spectator that “we should recognize that Christianity is the religion of our country.” {Of course, such unusual courage was a bit easier for SJ than for most of Britain’s sorry politicos, he himself being of Muslim parentage – his father a Pakistani bus driver.)


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, March 30, 2015


 Having destroyed the UK’s constitution by irresponsible and unwanted patchwork semi-devolution (to ‘regions’ recognized only by a few Celts), its economy by over-borrowing, its school system by comprehensivisation, its universities by PeeCee, its health service by non-medical management, its welfare system by excess, its royals by illusory multiculti ambitions, its legislative capacity by E.U.-deputation, its criminal justice system by drugs unrealism, its postal service by egalitarian pricing, its telephone system by ‘cold calling’ and non-answering, and its streets by dog-ends, overflowing bins and non-numbering of residences, Britain embarked on subjecting its armed forces (already denied relevant weapons and policies for coping with elementary terrorism and treachery) to paedohunting – beginning with the super-eminent Army supremo Lord Bramall, 91, who had his country seat infested for hours with self-righteous cops sporting full gear of helicopters, AK47s, nightsticks and mobile televisions ooops telephones even though, at his age, he presumably bore no responsibility for the disastrous Blair Wars which had failed to set back mad Mueslis one iota and left the future of Europe in the hands of Greek socialists, Italian frauds and French countrydwellers (if also, thankfully, of Russia’s Mr Putin) (cf. Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 22 iii).


The amazing Singapore leader Lee Kuan Yew died at 91, having – despite his ‘authoritarianism,’ eugenicism* and Confucianism (he had successfully promulgated caning for criminals, children and soldiers and tax breaks for graduate mothers) – turned his country into a well-organized economic powerhouse and magnet for world business talent, if giving a back seat to culture and ‘human rights.’**

Richard Nixon remarked that if Lee had lived in another time and place, he would have attained the world stature of a Churchill, a Disraeli or a Gladstone. Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush respectively called Lee a "remarkable leader and statesman" and "one of the brightest and most effective world leaders that I have ever known" during the launch of Lee’s book, Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going. Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher praised “his way of penetrating the fog of propaganda and expressing with unique clarity the issues of our time and the way to tackle them." Her successor, Labour moderate and multiculti multimillionaire Tony Blair, said of Lee: he is "the smartest leader I ever met."

Lee, a Cambridge double-starred First (at Fitzwilliam College, along with his equally brilliant wife of the same Hakka racial origin), had often dismissed ideas of equality as delusions of religious and political fanatics.

LKY was a most flexible politician, getting on with even the post-War Japanese (who had sent him for execution in 1943), the unbusinesslike Malays and the communist Peking-led Chinese and extending his handouts for graduate mothers to all when it seemed expedient. LKY’s conventional multiculti sentiments notwithstanding, the fantastic success of Singapore (which became richer per caput than oil-endowed Scotland) had probably owed as much to its racial unity and attractiveness to southern Chinese as to LKY’s remarkable initiative – in particular to its being 75% Chinese and thus relatively immune from corruption that plagued multiracial societies.

* Guardian, 24 iii: In social as in economic affairs, Lee tried to shape society to an extent attempted perhaps only by Mao Zedong in recent times. What began in the early years as a voluntary family-planning campaign ended up with the state trying to influence marriage choices and “enhance” Singapore’s genetic quality by encouraging graduates to reproduce among themselves. .... Ethnic prejudice lurked just under Lee’s image of technocratic rationalism. He combined assumptions about Chinese cultural supremacy with belief in genetic theories which influenced social policy in Singapore.

** Daily Mail, 24 iii: They might engrave on his memorial one of his many sayings: ‘I tried to be correct, not politically correct.’ Lee was a great man, albeit flawed as all such are, who achieved something wholly remarkable. Our own leaders would be far better employed taking guided tours of Singapore for the next six weeks than mouthing nothings on the hustings.


Britain’s Conservative Party, which had tried to go green, love hoodies, splurge on foreign aid, allow gypsy immigration, support the disastrous Arab Spring, bring in gay marriage, and of course to abjure racism, found its starlet Pakistanie, promoted-to-Baroness Warsi, sharing platforms with Muesli extremists (Sunday Telegraph, 22 iii, Andrew Gilligan); and a Pakistani-grandparented ‘Tory-dream’ candidate, British Army captain Afzal Amin, selected by it for a Birmingham (Dudley North) seat, in secret talks to persuade the ‘far right’ English Defence League into ‘spectacular rallying’ (against the building of a £18M mosque) that the Pak ‘race hero’ would then have magically resolved to general acclaim.

Amin also appeared to tell the former EDL leader, Tommy Robinson, over a Pizza Express meal, that he would be prepared to pay EDL for canvassers because he needed “two white working-class lads” to tell voters that, if they supported the Army, they should vote for him. The crime-plotting retired army captain also pledged to act as the EDL’s “unshakeable ally” in parliament if Robinson were able to help him (Guardian, 23 iii) – but agreed to stand down as Conservative candidate when his wheeze came to light.


 The sorry state of the PeeCee-penetrated universities of the USA – a country supposedly fighting Tallyhoes, alQueerdo and ISIS – was nicely exposed by student pranksters (New York Post, 24 iii). A video sting operation showed Cornell’s assistant dean for students, Joseph Scaffido, agreeing to everything suggested by an undercover muckraker posing as a Moroccan student. Scaffido casually endorsed inviting an ISIS “freedom fighter’’ to conduct a “training camp” for students at Cornell’s upstate Ithaca campus -- bizarrely likening the activity to a sports camp.

    Is it OK to bring a humanitarian pro-“Islamic State Iraq and Syria” group on campus, the undercover for conservative activist James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas asked. Sure, Scaffido said in the recorded March 16 meeting.  Scaffido didn’t even blink an eye when the undercover asked about providing material support for terrorists – “care packages, whether it be food, water, electronics.” How about supporting Hamas? No problem at all, Scaffido replied.


 Diplomatically and majestically surmounting Russian vs American tensions, White leader Jared Taylor addressed a meeting of 300 nationalists in St Petersburg (AmRen, 24 iii). There was good broad agreement on backing Christianity and kindred traditions against Islam and third-world immigration; and on the likelihood of Russia providing once more the only serious defence of European civilization – though the meeting had eventually to be closed down due to a hoax bomb call (probably from one of 40 protesters outside the St Petersburg Holiday Inn).

European Pressphoto Agency; published in New York Times, 22 iii.
 Davidson Yukka of the National Independence Party of Finland pointed out that in some respects Russia was freer than any other country in Europe. Some forms of speech had come under attack in countries such as Finland, where it was possible to lose one’s job for criticizing homosexuals or opposing gay marriage. “The European Union is an idea that has failed,” he said, “but the politicians are still riding this dead horse.” He concluded that if our enemies abuse and denounce us it is because we are right.

    Britain was represented, e.g. by Nick Griffin, the former head of the British National Party who had become active in the new Alliance for Peace and Freedom. He argued that Western leaders have the Midas touch in reverse: Everything they touch turns to blood. He predicted that Europe will either end up as a caliphate or there will be a civil war, and that it is now Russia’s turn to lead the world and prevent catastrophe. To this end, Russia should go on a media offensive to counteract the irrational hostility found in the West. RT television broadcasts were a good first step, but they must be supplemented with a strong social media campaign. Mr. Griffin also argued that Russia should help replace the dollar as the sole means of international exchange.

    JT especially observed that the religion of America is no longer Christianity. Rather, it is “diversity”:

"We are not to believe in Jesus Christ. We are to believe that a crazy mix of races, of languages, of habits, of religions, of manners is a great and wonderful thing. The slogan of America is “diversity is our greatest strength.”

    In 2007, General George Casey, who commanded the American troops in Iraq, announced, “I firmly believe the strength of our Army comes from our diversity.” What is this? Does the strength of an army not from good training? From good weapons? From love of country? No. The US Army is strong because it has soldiers from Guatemala and the Philippines and Haiti and Mexico. This is insanity. But this insanity of diversity is the new religion of America.

    But my country is not content just to commit suicide. It wants every Western country to commit suicide. When the United States was dropping bombs on Serbia in 1999–America loves to drop bombs–General Wesley Clark explained why the bombing was necessary: There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. We are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states. And for Americans, multi-ethnic does not only mean Serbs and Croats and Bosnians. It means Arabs, Africans, Asians, Muslims, Hindus–anything and everything. That is what my country wants for you! Diversity!

    England’s ever-more peecee ‘Ukip’ and France’s yag-‘marriage’-accepting ‘National Front’ were conspicuous by their absence from the St Petersburg conference; but the get-together was subsidized by President Putin’s ‘Rodina’ party.’"


  A questionnaire issued to 400K Brits from the Psychology Department Cambridge University yielded only three recognizably valid results (from those taking the trouble to reply to the online survey, published in PLOSOne): that the university towns of London, Oxford, Cambridge and Brighton were the most ‘open-to-experience’/tender-minded/intellectual/argumentative; that East Anglians were more conscientious/conservative; and that the Welsh and Glaswegians were more neurotic (Daily Mail, 25 iii; DTelegraph, 25 iii).

{The limitations of the g-neglecting ‘Big Five’ personality dimensions which yielded the Cambridge non-result are indicated and corrected in TgF, Chap. 2, which backs extracting g and thus dealing in terms of a ‘Big Six’ (Brand, 1994, ‘How many dimensions of personality?’ Psychologica Belgica 34); R.B.Cattell, passim.}


As worldwide interest focussed on the possible motivation of Germanwings under-pilot Andreas Lubitz, who had crashed his Barcelona-bound Airbus plane in the French Alps, killing 150, authorities and MSM were distinctly slow to remark that Lubitz was single, never sported a steady girlfriend, still lived with his parents at age 28, had argued about something with his Airbus captain, had previously been known as a gay flight attendant, had been photoed in homosexual capitals San Francisco (by Golden Gate Bridge) and Miami, and (as some internetters said) “looked faggoty.”

However, after a day of denying Lubitz (a Jewish name) had any psychological problems (or “issues”), authorities did admit he had been treated for depression – perhaps not unconnected with his six-month suspension from a pilot training programe. Later, he was said to have been repeatedly issued sick notes for a “physical” problem {AIDS?}; and an attempted girlfriend said he was a “tormented soul” who craved fame and would wake with nightmares; but the homosexual possibility remained unmentioned/unmentionable for three days (Independent, 28 iii – which added that Lubitz had received psychiatric treatment from Airbus owner Lufthansa across an 18-month period).

{If mass murderer AL did turn out to be a yag, the case would long provide the star example of the horrors to which PeeCee could lead and of the dominance of peecee censorship in Western public life.}


English universities should be robbed of 25% of their student fee income, opined the ‘tsar’ of the LibCon Coalition’s Commission for Social Mobility, Equality, Harmony and Holiness, one Alan Milburn, formerly a Labour MP (Guardian, 27 iii). The resulting cash would be redirected to increasing salaries for would-be schoolteachers prepared to work in rough areas.

No evidence was offered that the largesse would improve exam results for “disadvantaged” children even on the exercises in rote learning that had become the gateway to luni entrance since 1980; but teachers of the rough should, thought Milburn, enjoy accelerated promotion to headships (and early retirement?...). Mr Milburn owed his own education to a comprehensive school and Lancaster University (formerly Preston Poly). {Yes, Britain’s LibLabCon rulers were united in their g-denying egalitarianism and environmentalism.}


As in the UK, so in the USA: multicultifiends were taking, in 2015, to pretending that they saw the need to discuss – as they always discussed... – the topic of race which they had turned over a generation into one on which the expression of ‘incorrect’ views would lead to criminalization, ostracization, banning and sacking (see Trevor Phillips, above). But, at least across the Pond, reply to conversational pseudo-enthusiasm was on offer (World Net Daily, 26 iii):

"You know just how scholarly a policy paper is when it is studded with a clichéd expression like “We need to have a conversation about . . .” The pop-phrase is familiar from these farcical usages: “We need to have a conversation about race”–when, in reality, we do nothing but subject ourselves to a one-way browbeating about imagined slights committed against the pigmentally burdened. “We need to have a conversation about immigration”–when such a “conversation” is strictly confined to a lecture on how to adapt to the program of Third World mass immigration. This particular “conversation” involves learning to live with a lower quality of life, poorer education, environmental degradation, less safety and security, more taxation and alienation.

    In this mold is a policy paper by Jennifer Bradley, formerly of the liberal Brookings Institute. Bradley had a stroke of luck. Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report found fit to link her essay on his eponymous news site. Titled “The Changing Face of the Heartland: Preparing America’s Diverse Workforce for Tomorrow,” Bradley’s Brookings essay would have been more honestly titled “Get With the Program, Middle American! Demography Is Destiny.”

    Disguised as scholarship, the Bradley essay schools Middle America at length on how to prepare its diversifying workforce for tomorrow. Thus, for example, she states that “America is on the cusp of becoming a country with no racial majority, where new minorities are poised to exert a profound impact on U.S. society, economics and politics.”

    The implication here is that this seismic shift is due to a mystic force beyond the control of the host population, rather than to willful policies in which the native population has never had a say and will likely never have one. Bradley’s particular concern is with “two demographic shifts.” The one is the aging of the predominantly white (and presumably productive) generation of Americans born after World War II. Another is the concomitant influx of “Mexicans, Hmong, Indians, Vietnamese, Somalis, Liberians and Ethiopians.”

    ....As Bradley sees it, a feature of the diversity explosion in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Midwest microcosm is a widening “race-based education and achievement gap” that will “become a drag on workforce growths unless something was done to reverse these trends.”

    Translated, this means the immigrant population isn’t measuring up. I can think of a few unexplored options to narrow the gap described. One is to welcome immigrants who’ll add value to the economy, rather than drain taxpayer resources. Bradley, however, is here not to strike up a true conversation–which would include exploring all options–but to dictate the terms of the “conversation.”

    ...Because the imported population is failing to achieve parity with the host population, Bradley has inferred that the newcomers are “underserved”; that they require more resources, when the fault could just as well lie in the kind of incompatible immigrant being privileged by policy makers. The essay’s premise is that America is “underserving” her immigrant population, when it is the other way round: Averaged out, the immigrant population is underserving the American economy.

    Demographics need not be destiny. The West became the best not by out-breeding the undeveloped world–not due to huge numbers–but because of human capital: people of superior ideas and abilities, capable of innovation, exploration, science, philosophy.


 As the dirt-poor but strategically placed Muesli state of Yemen erupted in the Solunni vs Shitite ethno-sectarian civil warfare that had long been Western people’s only hope (since their politicians were too peecee and slow-witted to abandon their fatuous hopes of bombing the Middle East into demakrazy), at least the American ‘far right’ began to wake up. Pat Buchanan (27 iii):

    "....This week, the Saudis sent their air force against the Houthi rebels who had seized the capital of Sanaa, driven out the president, and have now driven south to Aden to take over half of the country.

Why is the Saudi air force attacking the Houthis?

The Houthis belong to a sect close to the Shiite and are supported by Iran. Yet the Houthis, who bear no love for us, began this war to expel al-Qaida from Yemen. And their hatred for ISIS is surely greater than it is for us or Israel, as, last week, 137 of their co-religionists were massacred in two mosque bombings in Sanaa. ISIS claimed credit.

In summary, though the Houthi rebels in Yemen, Shiite militia in Iraq, Iran, Hezbollah, and the Alawite regime of Assad may not love us, they look on al-Qaida and ISIS as mortal enemies. And, thus far, they alone have seemed willing to send troops to defeat them.

Where are the Turkish, Saudi, Kuwaiti or Qatari troops?

During World War II, the U.S. Navy and Merchant Marine shipped tanks, guns and munitions to a Soviet Union that was doing most of the fighting and suffering most of the casualties in the war against Hitler.

No matter all the "Uncle Joe" drivel at Tehran and Yalta, we were never true friends or allies, and shared nothing in common with the monster Stalin, save Hitler's defeat.

If President Nixon could toast Mao Zedong, can we not deal with Ayatollah Khamenei?"

And why wouldn’t America admit its mistake of backing hypocritical Saudi and its alQueerdo products and instead talk with President Putin about a White/European/Nordic league that would control the Middle East via its relatively Caucasian Shitite allies of Iran and Syria? (And settle the Ukraine in the course of the rapprochement....)


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.