Sunday, July 17, 2016


Whether UK politicians could get round the ‘xenophobic’ LEAVE referendum demand of voters was answered as  Andrea Leadsom (q.v.) gave up her ambition to lead the ‘Conservative’ party. Her offence had been to allude to her mother-of-three status as being a helpful qualification in one seeking to run the country – and to fail to mention the compensating advantages of childlessness which had made Queen Elizabeth I, Benjamin Disraeli and Ted Heath such effective leaders in their day.

At a stroke, her withdrawal over a little realism, spared cuckservatives the image of ‘the nasty party’ which the Camoronian Theresa May had led them to fear; and restored them in a flash to being ‘the dreary party’ – an image with which the dolts were happier (preferring a ‘safety first’ subscription to PeeCee – as many a mother-of-three might....).

Fortunately, Leadsom’s retreat – reaffirming her party as one of polite peecee globalisers who would do anything for a quiet profit-making life – meant that the hopeless factions of the British ‘left’ had the opportunity to speak truth to power about the realities of biological human differences in race, sex, age, polygamy, criminality, stupidity and sexual orientation and to demand not fine peecee sentiments but tangible improvements.

At least one of Labour’s warring ‘progressives’ would surely seize the chance of adding separatism to its socialism and thus offering – as was happening all over Europe and America – a national welfarism that would would ensure the targeting of state largesse towards those who mde serious contributions to national objectives (not least by paying substantial sums in taxation).


After decades of being over-represented among shooters of White cops, Black cops, Whites in general and each other, US Blacks decided to be largely reasonable about a Black who had been radicalized  following dishonourable army discharge for sexual molestation, so, after the Dallas horror, protests, riots and looting of White shops was sporadic and accompanied by only a few killings of Whites. But verbal bellicosity was deemed necessary to distract attention from the Black slayer of six who had himself planned to become a cop until his racism (ooops, anti-racism) took over – as star Jewish columnist Melanie Phillips recorded (Times, 12 vii):

"....Last week the African American Defense League posted a message encouraging violence against police. Marchers in New York city chanted “What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!” Last August, Texas ‘Black Lives Matter’ protesters called for the “lynching” and “killing” of white people and white police officers. Until now, ‘Black Lives Matter’ has been treated with respect and hailed as a nascent civil rights movement.

    In fact, it suppresses rights and it is certainly anything but civil. On campus it silences free speech through pathologically sensitive “trigger alerts” that shut down debate and intimidate anyone deemed to be racially offensive.

    White liberals, who either agree that white society is profoundly racist or are terrified that they might be labelled racist if they object to this calumny, have never called out black power extremists for promoting prejudice. They call it instead anti-racism."


While the peoples of the UK found their EUSSR-rejecting (and thus nationalism-accepting) referendum result swiftly stolen from them by their ruling ‘Conservatives’ wangling one Moronic* (Theresa) May into the premiership so she could continue the peecee globalism that had suited PMs Blair, Brown and Cameron and all employers of slave labour, the USA was proving it was made of sterner stuff.

The flamboyant realist Donald Trump (q.v.) overtook ‘Crooked’ Hillary Clinton in the critical election battlegrounds of Florida and Pennsylvania after the former secretary of state came under withering criticism from the FBI (Times, 14 vii). In Florida, where the 2000 election was decided, in June Mrs Clinton had led her Republican rival for the White House by eight points; but by July she trailed him by 42 per cent to 39 per cent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll.

‘The Donald’ also led by 43 per cent to 41 per cent in Pennsylvania, where the Democratic nominee had won every election since 1988. The two candidates were tied in Ohio, another crucial swing state. (Since 1960 no presidential candidate had won the White House without winning at least two of Pennsylvania, Florida and Ohio.)

    French people, too, were reported as becoming enraged by Muesli atrocities, failure to integrate, continued invasion and tireless overbreeding at public expense. They rated their socialist President Hollande as the worst leader in the entire history of the Fifth Republic.

*And most likely Mendacious. A day after appointing her anti-Brexit Cabinet, MM flew to Edinburgh to assure First Clottish Minister Codface that MM would not ask Brussels for UK freedom until Scotland agreed – i.e. never, La Sturgeon could say.

The meeting of the two largely socialist wymmin went well, since Codface was relieved to gather she could avoid another referendum on Scottish independence which the SNP would have once more lost (thanks to ‘Scotland’s oil’ having become near-worthless and thus unable to make up for the London largesse which Scotland had enjoyed for a century).


In a world first, Poland’s Interior Minister [cf. Home Secretary] became the first elected Western leader to condemn Multiculti-PeeCee publicly (Daily Mail, 16 vii). Commenting on the carnage in Nice, where a Muesli petty criminal of Tunisian origin had hired a lorry to mow down Frenchies (the immediate death toll was 84) celebrating the storming of the Bastille which had led on the murderous ending of France’s monarchy, aristocrats, bishops and millions of devout priests and peasants but also to the ‘glorious’ Napoleonic France of survivors’ and descendants’ fond imaginations, Minister Mariusz Blaszczak blamed France and Brussels for “decades of multiculturalism and political correctness” and called for tough action on jihad – especially singling out France’s tolerance of no-go areas for police in the country’s many human dustbins ooops ghettoes.

{Actually, ghettoes had worked passably well in Britain, touch wood. Pakis are left to fuel the drug needs of UK weenies in return for sexual favours – though not perhaps to murder them. But Britain’s Mueslis were Oriental and recalled Britain saving them from Hindus, whereas those in France were Black and recalled France’s endless, brutal and thankless war to retain control of North Africa.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 11, 2016


 In the latest move to deny citizenship to those who balk at Swiss culture, authorities rejected the naturalization application of two Muslim girls who refused to take school swimming lessons because boys were present (USA Today, 28 vi).

The girls, ages 12 and 14, who live in the northern city of Basel, had applied for Swiss citizenship several months ago, but their request was denied, Swiss media reported. The case showed how those who don’t follow Swiss rules and customs won’t become citizens, even if they have lived in the country for a long time, are fluent in one of the national languages – German, French or Italian – and are gainfully employed.

    Germany showed every sign of following suit, with well-advanced plans for obliging benefit claimants to pass a test of everyday fluency in German; and immigrants were told they must stay at government-agreed addresses  for their first three years – so as to hinder formation of ghettoes.


As Glasgow-Oxford-Harvard historian Niall Ferguson continued with his support for UK’s REMAIN and related great-and-good causes of indiscriminate multiculti race-mixing (Sunday Times, 3 vii), he drew a critical reply from correspondent William Clark:

"The ironic comment at the end of your book "War of the World" was that peace in Europe was achieved through the ethnic cleansing during the War of the World, and then remarked how immigration in recent years effectively saw the immigration of culturally different peoples by their millions. The implication is that war becomes more likely once again.

    As an immigrant, I did not agree with the focus on the immigration issues by the LEAVE campaign but it is a relative issue. I ask all immigrants I meet what they like about Britain, given it cannot be the food or our weather. The answer is that it is a nice country. Even young people from France, Italy and Germany say they like the sense of freedom here. At what point, under pre-Brexit arrangements, does everyone say: Enough! We could, just, fit the entire population of the world on this Island, but I think most people would say: Too many! What about the entire population of the European Union. After all, they do not have Habeas Corpus. What about 200 million residents here? One hundred million? So it is a relative issue but an entirely valid one, and the concerns of the public have been largely ignored by the intellectuals who supposedly speak for us. There are many areas of the country where the people feel there are already too many immigrants. Such people voted as is their right"

Clark was surely right: mass ethnic separations that made for peace after 1945 included the expulsion of Germans from Eastern Europe by the Red Army, Japanese withdrawal from China, the separation of Muslim Pakistan from mainly-Hindu India, the creation of a homeland in Israel where Jews could take refuge and the partition of Cyprus between Greek and Turkish communities; by contrast, the continued mixing of religions in Northern Ireland, Burma, Iraq, and India itself were ongoing disasters – as were the overoptimistic fantasies of Black-White co-operation in America and South Africa. Only the firmest dictatorial rule enabled communities who hated each other to live together – as in Madman Insane’s Iraq and Basher Assad’s Syria – though less pronounced conflicts could be handled by firm religion or ideology as under Catholicism in South Ameria and under communism in Russia, Yugoslavia and China.


 Amidst the encircling gloom at the Grauniad about the massive display in England of affection for the Queen on her 90th birthday, about English rugby victory in Australia, about the ‘liberal’-left failing to command votes whether wearing Liberal or Labour hats, and about the £10M taxpayers’ gift to ignoramic Iraq gurubureaucrat and multicultidupe Chilcot leaving Rev Blair a free man to enjoy his multi-million-pound diplomatic spoils, the intellectually and actually bankrupt newspaper let its star ‘maverick’ columnist deliver a little better cheer (7 vii, Simon Jenkins):

"Brexit is starting to deliver. British politics was constipated and has now overdosed on laxative. It is experiencing a great evacuation. It has got rid of a prime minister and is about to get rid of a leader of the opposition. It will soon be rid of a chancellor of the exchequer and a lord chancellor. It is also rid of two, if not four, Tory heirs apparent. Across the spectrum the left is on the brink of upheaval and perhaps historic realignment, if only the Liberal Democrats have the guts to engineer it. The Greens and Ukip have both lost their leaders. An entire political class is on the way out. As Oscar Wilde said of the death of Little Nell, it would take a heart of stone not to laugh"

Yes, despite the West’s globalizing capitalists and slave traders having embraced PeeCee and censorship to help their cause, the people of Scotland and non-metropolitan England had shown it was nationalists and kindred LEAVErs who had the votes –to the horror of chatterati.

More seriously, the Guardian also let Welsh Labour MP and Privy Councillor Ann Clwyd remind anti-war hysterics of what Madman Insane’s Iraq had been like until the US and UK mounted their second improving military intervention:

"I first became aware of human rights atrocities in Iraq in the 70s, before I became a politician. I met Iraqi students in Cardiff, some of whom had been imprisoned in Basra, and what they told me was so terrible I could hardly believe them. I came to learn, however, that it was only the tip of the iceberg.

    In 1991 I stood up in parliament and described what I had seen on the mountains of Iran and Iraq, when the Kurds fled from Saddam’s helicopter gunships. The scenes were appalling and typical of the attacks made by the Iraqi regime on Iraqis.

    Saddam killed hundreds of thousands of his own people. He was “the biggest weapon of mass destruction”, an Iraqi man once told me. “Why did it take so long for him to be removed?”

    Many Kurds were killed during the genocidal Anfal campaign, including as a result of the barbarous use of chemical weapons in Halabja. I met a number of the horribly burnt victims in a London hospital afterwards. Many, many others were killed brutally in cold blood in a maze of prisons and torture chambers all over the country. Repression, abuse, ethnic cleansing and extrajudicial killings continued right up to 2003.

    Saddam was without doubt a serious threat to domestic, regional and global stability. I had hoped the international community could remove or neutralise him without war. But sanctions, international indictments, UN security council resolutions: all had been tried; all had failed"


Israel announced it would help Kenya to build a 440-mile wall along its border with Somalia as part of a range of sweeteners from Binyamin Netanyahu to win African support against mad Mueslis at the United Nations. Kenya hoped that the wall, which drew comparisons with the controversial West Bank “separation barrier”, would stem the flow of terrorists from Somalia after attacks including the 2013 Westgate shopping centre siege in Nairobi in which at least 67 people died. The centre and some of its restaurants were Israeli-owned.

{No criticism of this Trumpian ‘xenophobic’ scheme was expected from the peecee goons of the West since it was wanted by Blacks.}


As Eurofanatics tried to recover from their defeat at the hands of the British electorate – suddenly revealed at the ballot box as being opposed to low-IQ-immigration after years of PeeCee in which such views were deemed unworthy of expression – the vengeful Times struck an especially low note by asking three-sprogged LEAVE candidate for the ‘Conservative’ leadership Andrea Leadsom what she thought of becoming a top political “mum.”

Obligingly, Andrea replied that motherhood might possibly give a candidate a certain edge over a childless rival {like Theresa May – and found herself promptly dumped on by the Times and the BBC. Of course, LEAVEr Leadsom had in no way complained of the ‘edge’ – in time and money -- that might accrue to childfree achievers such as:

Louisa May Alcott, Author of Little Women
Jane Austen, Author of Sense and Sensibility
Francis Bacon, Politician, Philosopher, Scientist
Tallulah Bankhead, Actress
Samuel Beckett, Author, Playwright, Poet
Ludwig Van Beethoven, Composer
William Blake, Artist, Poet
James Buchanan, 15th U.S. President
Pat Buchanan, Columnist, Politician/ U.S. Presidential Candidate
Sandra Bullock, Actress
Raymond Burr, Actor
Maria Callas, Opera Singer
Barbara Castle, British Politician
Kim Catrall, Actress
Helen Clark, New Zealand Prime Minister
George Clooney, Actor, Star of ‘Ocean's Eleven’

Etc. – see

allowing them to think, read, write and entertain in career-advancing ways. No wonder AL was outraged at her treatment by what she called the centre-left “gutter press.”


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 04, 2016


The case for acknowledging race differences – rather than denying them as simplistic, slight or arbitrary – was neatly summarized by three academics (led by Bo Winegard from Florida State University – home to the leading race realist, the late Glayde Whitney) in Quillette, 23 vi.

Authors’ Conclusion:

Most people believe that there are human races. They believe this not because they have a sophisticated understanding of genetic variation or human evolution, but because they see and categorize perspicuous phenotypic (and possibly behavioral) differences. Although many intellectuals have contended that these differences are largely superficial and distort underlying genetic realities, most research suggests that there are meaningful genetic differences among racial groups and that these differences are largely consistent with common racial classifications. Race is as real and useful as other constructs in the social sciences such as neuroticism, self-esteem, and intelligence. Therefore, with appropriate care and caution, scientists can and should study racial variation. This argument may appear alarming to people concerned about racial justice. But it doesn’t need to be. Tolerance and cosmopolitanism don’t require the leveling of diversity; they require the celebration of it. Race exists, but racism does not have to.

To which a correspondent usefully added:

A nice demolishing of the "race is a social construct" idea, but the notion that "racism" is abhorrent is a bit problematic. What is typically condemned these days as racism, is merely the preference by Whites (only) for their own race. This preference is entirely natural and no one bats an eyelash if other races loudly announce this preference for those closest to themselves. Racism doesn't necessarily mean that one is a supremacist.


Independent, 29 vi:

Japan’s Supreme Court has upheld the government’s blanket surveillance of the country’s Muslim community. The court struck down the second appeal by Japanese Muslim plaintiffs against what they perceive as an unconstitutional invasion of their privacy and freedom of religion.

A 2010 leak of 114 police files revealed nationwide surveillance of Japanese Muslims. The files revealed that Muslim places of worship, halal restaurants and Islam-related organisations across the capital, Tokyo, were being monitored.

To which an American correspondent added:

"A group of 17 Japanese Muslims, mostly from Middle Eastern and North African countries, decided to sue the Japanese government for infringing on their constitutional rights."

Here they go again with the notion that any random person can become a national of any country merely by living there. Not one Japanese citizen would consider an immigrant from the Middle East or North Africa a "Japanese Muslim."

Good for the Japanese government for looking out for its own people! Putting the West to shame again! If you want to make yourself extra Red-Pilled, travel from JFK to Tokyo Narita and back. In Narita airport there are no bums lying around, no unhelpful foreign security personnel (all native Japanese guys in uniforms with white gloves), and the bathrooms and other facilities are spotless.

Go back to JFK and it looks like it hasn't been serviced since 1970. There are derelict buildings outside of the main terminals and you might encounter a bum here and there. While at JFK, I asked a question of a black security guard, but he could not understand me as he was from somewhere in Africa!


BBC, 1 vii:

Austria’s highest court has annulled the result of the presidential election narrowly lost by the candidate of the far-right Freedom Party. The party had challenged the result, saying that postal votes had been illegally and improperly handled.
The Freedom Party candidate, Norbert Hofer, lost the election to the former leader of the Greens, Alexander Van der Bellen, by just 30,863 votes or less than one percentage point. The election will now be re-run.

Announcing the decision, Gerhard Holzinger, head of the Constitutional Court, said: “The challenge brought by Freedom Party leader Heinz-Christian Strache against the 22 May election . . . has been upheld.”

He added: “The decision I am announcing today has no winner and no loser, it has only one aim: to strengthen trust in the rule of law and democracy.”

Mr Hofer said on Friday he was pleased that the court had taken “a difficult decision”, adding: “I have great trust in the rule of law.”

Mr Van der Bellen said he was “very confident” he would emerge the winner. “Austria needs to be well represented in Europe and the world. If we can do it once, we can do it again,” he told reporters....

{The new election would be held in the autumn.}


 In a week of upheaval in Britain’s strange political system, the constitutional novelty of a referendum on ‘Europe’ (which had astonished pundits and pollsters by demanding LEAVE) saw the end of PM Daft Dave who had embraced mass immigration of illiterate Pakistanis, Somalians A/As and gypsies. True, it also ended the careers of the Tories’ top two intellectuals, blond ‘BoJo’ and bespectacled ‘Govey’, LEAVErs whose in-fighting left the party and PM-ship within the grasp of the Camoronian cleavage-flasher Nanny May; but LEAVErs Jacob Rees-Mogg (Eton and Trinity [Oxford]) and well-preserved mother-of-three bankerette Andrea Leadsom (U.Warwick) still had a chance, and nationalists were encouraged by several EUSSR member countries beginning to demand their own LEAVE referenda.

Amidst all the sudden British confusion (including Labour MPs voting 172-40 against their own REMAINER-feigning leader), dignities were preserved as France and the UK delivered a fine and moving commemoration of the 1M+ killed by their previous politicians in the 1916 Battle of the Somme – a co-operative exercise at the grand Thiepval Memorial made easier by France, too, wanting Yukay to leave Germany’s Fourth Reich as soon as possible (so as to resume its favoured Napoleonic posture, funded by German lolly).

{That the UK’s ‘Brexit’ LEAVE vote reflected, as much as it spearheaded wider European disaffection with the EUSSR “pseudo-state” and its failure to defend European culture (especially against mass immigration) was excellently articulated in a ten-minute radio talk by political philosopher John Gray (a Thatcher and Nato loyalist, author of False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism (1998 / 2009), lead book reviewer for New Statesman) (BBC R4, 3 vii, 08:50, ‘A Point of View’).

Like this blog, and probably like America’s Donald Trump, the fast-moving Gray now thought the traditional left-right contrast to lack much relevance to 21st-century issues, which would pit something like ‘national welfarism’ against ‘multicultural globalism’ -- cowardly ‘conservatives’ being doomed to defend the peecee infant which lib-leftists had foisted upon them while nationalists took over the serious business of competition.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 27, 2016


As the shooting of Labour MP Holy Jo Crawford by a loony loner and the subsequent instant orchestration of mass Westminster mourning took what little wind there had been out of LEAVE’s faintly nationalistic sails, polite conservatives, afraid of being called extremists, could not bring themselves to remark the humanitarian cause that had not figured on Jo’s agenda.

Occidental Observer, 18 vi:

"Jo Cox  wanted to make the world a better place and it was a cause for which she was willing to travel halfway across the globe. Whether consoling rape victims in Darfur or bombed out villagers in Afghanistan, it seemed the jet-setting international aid worker was rarely far from the action.

    Lately it had been the struggle of Syrian war refugees to get to the West that touched her heart, and their plight was a subject she returned to again and again after becoming a Member of Parliament. It seemed there was no victims anywhere she could not empathise with.

    Except, perhaps, with one striking omission.

And that would be the White child rape victims of Muslim grooming gangs in her own back yard. For her West Yorkshire constituency is near the epicentre of the Muslim child rape epidemic that has been sweeping the Labour heartlands of northern England, largely ignored or covered up by social services workers, police and politicians.

    For it is a striking omission that of all the subjects she enjoyed sounding off on, this world-famous crisis affecting the poorest Whites on her doorstep was not one of them. One cannot help wonder if this shrewd silence was connected to the fact that her lavishly paid MP’s job in her constituency of Batley and Spen largely depended on the support of the local Muslim community.

    Co-incidentally, just as Jo Cox was shot and stabbed to death outside her constituency office in Birstall last Thursday,  sentencing was about to take place at Leeds Crown Court  after a long trial involving a horrific case of Muslim child exploitation.

    The court heard that in Halifax, eleven miles from Cox’s constituency, a vulnerable underage girl had been left to fend for herself at the age of 13 after her mother died.  This child ended up being preyed on by 100 Muslim males who plied her with alcohol and drugs. The girl — nominally in council care — was then passed  from house to house and from town to town as far away as Manchester and London.

The girl described being filmed by Muslims on a mobile phone while being orally raped. She contracted an STD.  Some of the rapists were identified from CCTV which had been seized from the hotels she could remember, while others were caught because of DNA from stains on her clothing. The police said afterwords that the girl, one of two victims, had shown “immense courage and bravery in reporting these matters to the police and providing evidence.”

    At the Leeds trial, only fifteen of the men were convicted.  Originally over a hundred were arrested and doubtless dozens of culprits walked free.  It was a lurid and horrific story but such hearings are so common these days, they  have become wearily familiar.

    Nevertheless you would think this would be a issue that would enrage a feminist-minded, morally crusading MP.  But no, instead of fighting to defend the White girl victims of Muslim rape gangs, female Labour MPs have preferred to defend the Muslim community and deflect any criticism"

Or, like Jo Cox, they have chosen to ignore it completely. In her maiden speech, Jo Cox said that her community had been “deeply enhanced by immigration” but presumably child rape was not what she had in mind

Indeed, the good-networking MP could have been called Bomber Cox for her keen determination to bomb Basher Assad and his Alawites and Shitites so as to bring about an all-Solunni Syria which could form a massive caliphate with Turkey, al-Qaeda ISICK and Saudi. {Mercifully, Parliament had turned the option down.}


As Yukay voters, divided 50/50 between globalizers and nationalists,* faced years of uncertainty as to whether and on what terms they would get an ultra-messy divorce from Brussels, they could not complain of not having been shown the problem of scarcely controlled 3rd-world invasion they confronted: on the very eve of the ‘Brexit?’ referendum, 400 pumigrants in the shanties of Calais demonstrated their skills of brick-tossing, fence-scaling and lorry-commandeering as they headed for the utopia of London (lately equipped with a Muesli ‘Palestinian’-backing mayor, SadFreakHeCan, to greet them) (Sun, 22 vi).

Traffic at the busy port was stopped for hours, enabling hundreds of cars to be damaged. Fortunately for the illiterate A/A illegals, Britain’s great-and-good virtue-signallers thought they would be getting more Indian takeaways and Polish plumbers; and low-paid Brits on zero-hours contracts minded their cannabis lofts and pit bull terriers in far-away shitholes well north of Watford where Pakistani paedophiles provided care for teenagerettes that peecee-scared social workers and police could not manage. So Pax PeeCee would continue in Yukay – at least till central Europe’s civil war about mindless immigration got into full swing.

*This distinction – arguably the new faultline of modern politics – was articulated (22 vi) in the Times by Daniel Finkelstein (who, in the British context, called it one between REMAINians and LEAVEians, under either of which mass immigration would be doomed to continue). {How Labourites would yowl!}


Just how out of touch could politicians be? A memorably resounding answer of ‘Plenty!’ was provided at the end of Yukay’s lacklustre ‘Brexit?’ referendum where, just before the opening salvo of Sunderland’s pro-LEAVE 62% was declared on telly,  even UKIP’s Mr Garage declared his cause lost , along with most pollsters; and leading LEAVErs cancelled a London celebration party for LEAVE which they had organized.

In fact, however, the non-metropolitan heartlands of England and Wales voted nationalist/LEAVE and Scotland voted nationalist/REMAIN, causing PM Daft Dave and half Labour’s Shadow Cabinet to resign and three million shocked young Twitterers to seek a new referendum.

     Amid the wonders and turmoil, no possible leader could be detected by chatterati who would implement LEAVERs wishes – especially on low-IQ immigration which had evidently begun to make an unwelcome mark outside London. The problem was that, after a decade of demonizing Nigel Farage, there was no easy way of electing him into Parliament and into the elite of the new ‘national welfare’ party that Britain needed.

    Britain’s referendum decision to quit Germany’s EUSSR was a seismic moment for Europe because it pointed to the inescapable reality that a new national politics – whose angry force was for too long simply denied by the technocrats and governing classes – really was Trumping* Brussels’ supranational ambitions.

To most LEAVE voters, “ever closer union” might as well be a little-known Luther Vandross track. The animating, motivating, galvanising factor in the LEAVE vote was cutting immigration. “We want our country back” was shorthand for “We want our borders, schools, hospitals, police and houses back.” The people have spoken, and they wanted major cuts to immigration.

Whoever emerged to lead the Conservative Party next had to concede this – but there was a growing sense that senior LEAVErs didn’t yet recognise the extent of their promises. In a post-referendum statement, Boris Johnson mentioned immigration only once, expressing a desire to “take the wind out of the sails of ... those who would play politics on immigration”.

Perhaps he was in denial about the fact that it was the un-peecee politics of immigration that had delivered LEAVE’s victory and – if the betting odds were right – his likely entrance to Downing Street. Certainly, expecting the many globalizers in modern Conservative ranks to back nationalism was a tall order.

The task of breaking peecee multiculturalism would more naturally fall to parachutist Labour MP Major Dan Jarvis MBE (graduate of Aberystwyth University and King’s College London) who could be expected to get on with Powellite commodity trader Nigel Farage MEP whose UKIP had repeatedly shown it spoke for the national-welfarist concerns of many traditional Labour voters.

*On a flying visit to Scotland to open his refurbished Ayrshire golf course, The Donald hailed the LEAVE result as “fantastic.”


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 20, 2016


Re-invention of the wheel continued by university staff needing a grant – with predictable though otherwise perfectly satisfactory results. See below:

Association for Psychological Science, June 6, 2016:

Psychological characteristics link genes with upward social mobility, according to data collected from almost 1000 individuals over four decades. The data suggest that various psychological factors play a role in linking a person’s genetic profile and several important life outcomes, including professional achievement, financial security, geographic mobility, and upward social mobility.

    The study, led by psychological scientist Daniel W. Belsky of Duke University School of Medicine, builds on previous research indicating a genetic continuum that predicts individuals’ educational achievement. In the earlier study, the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium examined millions of genetic variants in more than 100,000 people and found that these variants could be aggregated and turned into a “polygenic score” that was linked with educational attainment"

Political correctness forbade mention of whether the linking “psychological characteristics” chiefly involved the g factor....


Desperate at the inexorable takeover of the low-class White votes which the left had assumed to be its own, even the holy Huffington Post allowed advocacy of violence against the ‘fascism’ of The Donald (and equally of British Brexiteers and Continental ‘far right’ patriots). See below:

Jesse Benn, Huffington Post, June 6, 2016:

"The rise of Donald Trump has exposed the frightening underbelly of America’s foulest tendencies.  ....Trump has not just flagrantly violated the typical boundaries of political discourse, his candidacy is linked to multiple instances of violence. It shouldn’t be a surprise that opposition to him has responded in kind. Yet, a lot of people seem shocked and appalled at this perfectly logical reaction.

In the face of media, politicians, and GOP primary voters normalizing Trump as a presidential candidate—whatever your personal beliefs regarding violent resistance—there’s an inherent value in forestalling Trump’s normalization. Violent resistance accomplishes this. In spite of this, such resistance is apparently more offensive and unacceptable to societal norms and liberal sensibilities than the nastiness being resisted in the first place. ....Violence that takes place at Trump rallies –- in support or opposition –- is a reaction to the tone he’s set, and the blame for it should land primarily on his shoulders"


As 49 dancing homosexuals were despatched and another few score injured in the early morning at an Orlando, Florida, nightclub, commentators advanced their own favourite causal factors. Donald Trump blamed radical Islam; the Guardian’s Owen Jones – a young yag himself – blamed homophobia; President Obarmy blamed lax US gun laws; some blamed mental illness (for the shooter was a manic-depressive) and drug use (the attacker used steroids; and some blamed PeeCee (the attacker’s craziness and homophobia had come to the attention  of  his employer (a security company – the UK-based ‘G4S’) and the FBI but no action was taken because the attacker was a Muslim.

In truth, all these factors were probably involved in multiplicative interaction with each other and easily so since they covary in the general population. But the central factor was surely Islam: attacker Omar Mateen was a Muslim who sometimes expressed extreme views and claimed membership of Hezbollah and even phoned police to tell of his allegiance to ISICK; his father was a Muslim who, despite living in New York, was a contender for the presidency of his native Afghanistan; Mateen’s wife – whom he beat daily – was a Muslim who made no effort to report his peculiarities to police.

Moreover, whatever the other causal complexities, Islam was plainly partly causal directly to homophobia, intolerance, psychopathic violence and wife abuse. No wonder The Donald was quick to observe that the Orlando horror was a fresh sign of Muesli ‘invasion without uniforms; and that Hillary Clinton’s declining to denounce radical Islam showed she must herself be “crazy.”

Yet ‘liberal’ apologists for Islam threw themselves tirelessly into insisting MSM  attribute the outrage – the worst against yags since the Holocaust -- to nothing but homophobia.

Contradicting any conventional of that sort, it transpired that Mateen was well known to be himself a homosexual; and he had trawled for partners at the club where he would go on the rampage and also online.

    The murderous antipathy of Western Mueslis to yags was confirmed as five Allahmaniacs went on trial in Luton, UK, for urging coreligionists to join and fight for ISICK. A speech was recorded by an undercover officer referred to as Kamal, who spent 20 months infiltrating the Muesli group and recording their meetings (Times, 16 vi).

One Mohammed told the group: “When the parliament are making laws and having Gay Pride today in the UK, Gay Pride, where’s the pride in being gay? There’s no pride in being gay.” He added: “Alhamdulillah [praise to be God] the people haven’t caught you, or it’s high building for you.”


As Brexit maintained for a week a 6% lead in UK opinion polls, the ‘liberal’-left’s darling columnist, Italian-homed Polly Toynbee cracked: the patriotic White working class on whom Polly et al. had relied for tradition-respecting votes (even as the likes of Polly and Owen Jones enthused about such unlikely bedfellows as Islam, feminism, disablism and yaggery were to be denounced as foolish neo-Nazis who would wreck the comfy world of peecee piety that ‘anti-Nazis’ had inflicted on British public life while keeping business sweet by letting foreign slave labour stream in.

More intellectually, Polly began to admit the major re-alignment of Western politics into ‘national welfarism’ vs ‘peecee globalism’ long foreseen in this blog. Guardian, 14 vi.  See below:

"This is the sound of Britain breaking. Here ends our “moderate, tolerant” self-image. Imagine Brexit wins and two years later prime minister Boris Johnson is still embroiled in quarrelsome EU exit talks. ....Barking and Nottingham people will see no change, same migrants, same sense of powerlessness. Recession-hit, facing worse cuts, voters won’t blame themselves for their own folly. Old problems are unresolved – an economy reliant on City and property bubbles, low skills, low productivity, atrophied public services, hopes raised and dashed. [Michael] Gove and Johnson risk losing control of the furies they have unleashed.

    As high-status Ford jobs are swapped for low-paid warehouse work, indignation is diverted daily against migrants.

    That moment is fertile for some yet-worse demagogue who calls for throwing out migrants already here. Expect the volume to be raised against “elites” – anti-parliament, anti-politics, bored of democracy itself. Ignite hatred against Europe, blame Brussels for deliberately impoverishing us in revenge, stirring centuries-old enmities.

    Blend all that with a little nationalistic leftish populism, not all of it bad: nationalise our utilities and rail, eject foreign owners from key industries and property, pump up armed forces and national pride. These are potent ingredients for militant majoritarianism, blaming minorities and minority opinions. The Human Rights Act is abolished and the BBC absorbed into government. National socialism {= Nazism/NSDAP) will no doubt carry a new name – but it’s there in the making"

Polly’s belated recognition of this blog’s ‘realignment’ thesis was supported by top columnist Rachel Sylvester in the Times (14 vi). See below:

"One West Midlands MP estimates that 60 per cent of Labour voters in his constituency are supporting Brexit. “The Remain Labour MPs who go out canvassing are tearing their hair out because it’s so overwhelmingly for Leave. But to be honest I’m shocked that they’re shocked. Traditional Labour voters are not enthusiastic about the EU and they’re furious about immigration.” ....

The truth is that the referendum is exposing Labour’s breach with its traditional voters in a way that has profound implications for the country as well as the party. In Birmingham, campaigners were told to take all mentions of immigration out of their literature. Although the local MPs begged to be allowed to tackle local concerns head on, they were banned from doing so by party staff following instructions from the leader’s office. ....

Labour and the Remain campaign are now, as one former shadow cabinet minister puts it, “reaping the whirlwind” of years of ignoring voters. For those who feel dissatisfied with the status quo — the “left behind” voters who have suffered from globalisation — Brexit feels like the only way of changing their situation in the absence of a credible alternative government. ....

In an era of identity politics, when tribal loyalties are breaking down and culture wars are breaking out, the Labour coalition is fracturing. ....

Labour [has been] turning into one big Islington dinner party offering vegan lasagne to people who prefer beef. One Labour MP says that the [referendum] campaign is exposing growing tensions within his party just as much as among the Conservatives. There’s a rupture between the metropolitan, liberal wing and the traditional, working-class base. The Tory splits are Westminster high politics but the Labour ones are a shifting of the tectonic plates.”

Melanie Phillips (Times, 14 vi) chipped in with “We are witnessing, in effect, a mass uprising across the West against globalisation” – and, she might have added, against globalisation’s bolt-on philosophies of multiculturalism and political correctness which had been forced on cowardly businessmen, state-employed top fat cats and financiers by ‘liberal’-left bullying. – Funny to think that as metropolitan lefties were rejected by a revived Old Labour party, they would have to seek their fortune among cuckservatives just as Christians had historically been sure to maintain bridges with the rich and powerful who in return for a reasonable press kept churches afloat!


As the killing of a well-liked youngish female Labour MP, a keen REMAINer along with her husband, by a 52-yr Yorkshire depressive, weirdo and loner who had once made occasional ‘hard right’ contacts, allowed REMAINer Daft Dave to close the EUSSR referendum campaign with five days of national mourning for the saintly Jo Cox, US columnist David Frum (Times, 18 vi) observed that the West’s recent move towards anti-‘expert’, anti-establishment, anti-PeeCee and pro-nationalist sentiment could be traced to the bizarre infliction of yet more mass immigration by the likes of multiculti-maddened Merkel and Obarmy (and, he could have added, Britain’s slave-seeking Labourites who needed at once to placate money men and to replace the White working-class voters whom Labour had deserted). See below:

"....after only the briefest pause during the deep recession of 2008-2009, legal and illegal migration to the US has accelerated again: about 1.1 million legal migrants in both 2014 and last year, plus more than 500,000 illegal migrants. This pace represents a near doubling of the pace of migration during the deepest years of the recession.

    It has been the policy of the Obama administration to welcome even faster migration in the future. The package negotiated with Congress in 2013 would have doubled legal migration. A Republican mutiny forced its abandonment. Obama responded with orders suspending enforcement against approximately half the illegal aliens in the US: those who’d entered the US as children, then of those who had entered in early adolescence, then later of their parents as well.

    Within weeks of the later orders being issued, tens of thousands of unaccompanied Central American minors surged across the US border. Thousands more have followed in the two years since.

    Even more predictable than this surge are the dangerous cultural and political consequences. Opposition to Obama’s migration policy fuels Trump’s, just as reaction against Angela Merkel’s has animated nationalist movements across Europe.

    Liberals have tended to assume that mass migration is essential to society. But we should have learnt by now that mass migration is one of the greatest threats to a liberal system. In Trump’s America, as in France and Germany, excess migration triggers a backlash among the host population. Borders are as necessary to a free society as laws: they are the first law that makes a country a country.

    Obama has spoken powerfully against Trump’s demagoguery. His criticism might more usefully be directed inwards: for it was his own decisions that enabled the rise of such a simultaneously ludicrous and sinister challenger"

Whether the orgy of mourning for REMAINer Jo would make voting LEAVE on Thursday 23rd – PeeCee’s date with destiny, at least till The Donald got his chance to knock it out in November – remained to be seen. MSM preferred to play up shooter Thomas Mair’s ancient internet links rather than his seeking psychiatric help for a depressive episode just the day before the killing.*

The BBC even claimed that, after a little epilepsy in childhood, Mair had no mental illness*; and it disregarded the amazement of Mair’s brother and mixed-race half-brother at the very suggestion that Mair was ‘far right’ or ‘racist,’ ‘vile’ etc. – he was best known for free tending of old ladies’ gardens and attendance at his public library.

There was nothing to disturb the referendum’s avoidance of serious discussion of mass low-IQ immigration, for all that this was what concerned many voters, especially LEAVErs. Only UKIP guru and LEAVEr Nigel Farage dared an advert giving a flash of ‘Syrian’ pumigrants trekking in their hundreds across Slovenia towards Germany – an advert which had him instantly condemned on the Beeb as a ‘racist’ etc., yet which might just get through to the part of Britain’s proletariat that had not yielded to welfarism and remained proud, pugilistic, pie-scoffing, pint-quaffing, pub-crawling and parliamentary in its love of quick-fire and good-humoured debate in the language which England had given the world but which the forever-warmongering French forbade to the dismal yet dictatorial EUSSR.

*Most likely the enlightened Beeb no longer regarded ‘bipolar disorder’ as an illness – along with such mere ‘issues’ as schizophrenia, hysteria, homosexuality and psychopathy – probably racism, xenophobia, militarism and uninvited caning were the only ‘real’ mental pathologies left....


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, June 14, 2016


As the UK’s referendum on membership of the EUSSR approached with scarcely a mention of the public’s favourite topic of immigration – let alone of race, IQ, Blacks, Arabs, gypsies or Muslims – the Turkish plan for converting Europe to Islam was revealed in the Times by Melanie Phillips (7 vi). Even the most cowardly dullards with their heads in the sand could no longer stay in denial. Turkey’s dictator Recep Erdogan had exploited the ‘Syrian’ pumigrant crisis to demand visa-free travel for Turks into the EU and was a dangerous Islamist who quite openly advocated invasion and takeover.

"....Brexiteers are correct. Turkey is set to funnel untold numbers of new migrants into the EU and then to Britain. Cameron’s statement that the visa waiver won’t apply to Britain because it is outside the Schengen passport-free area is typically mealy-mouthed. Once inside the EU, the fact that Turks will have to show their passports at the UK border won’t stop them somehow coming here.

    A leaked European Commission report also warned that other migrants, including criminals or terrorists, might start trying to obtain fraudulent Turkish passports in order to gain access to Europe. The former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, described the visa waiver as “perverse, like storing gasoline next to the fire we’re trying to extinguish”.

    Cameron and Major are not just slippery but are betraying Britain.

    This crisis also plays into Erdogan’s strategy for Islamising Europe. He has told us this himself. At last year’s celebration in Istanbul of the 562nd anniversary of the fall of Constantinople, Erdogan told a cheering crowd of an estimated two million Turks: “What is the conquest? The conquest is Hijrah [expansion of Islam through emigration] . . .

    “The conquest is Mecca . . . The conquest is Jerusalem . . . The conquest is al-Andalus [Muslim Spain] . . . The conquest is to open the doors of Anatolia up to Vienna for this blessed nation . . . It is to make the sycamore [the Ottoman empire] meet with the ground that would cover three continents and seven climates . . .”

    Judging by his rhetoric, Erdogan wishes to recreate the Ottoman empire and take over much of Europe. It’s an aim shared by the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda, Islamic State and the rest. The difference is that, courtesy of the EU, he believes he can achieve this without a shot being fired. Brussels will simply open the gates of Europe for its Islamic conquerors to enter.
The revelation that Erdogan had actually gone public with his ambitions would surely boost the UK’s LEAVE vote beyond the level pegging shown in early-June polls"

In view of Melanie’s revelation, it was no surprise that the authoritarian, censorious and punitive Erdogan should turn out to be invited to be the chief orator at the funeral in Kentucky of ‘Muhammad Ali’ (q.v.), who himself had long been a supporter of the Muesli despot’s party and invasion plan.

{Eventually, funeral organizers withdrew the invitation. The violent propensities and dotty beliefs of the seriously non-integratist Nation of Islam, which star member Ali never rejected outright, were brought to the attention of Ali-worshippers by columnist Daniel Finkelstein in the Times (8 vi).}


Progress towards a re-alignment in Western politics – creating national welfarist parties and consigning greedy globalizers, cowardly ‘conservatives’ (cuckservatives), defecting deists, pious pacifists and loopy liberals to holding the peecee baby which they had adopted from cultural Marxists who aimed to end Western civilization – was reported from the famous (though now run-down) coalmining powerhouse of south Wales (Guardian, 8 vi, Aditya Chakrabortty).

“South Wales will be among the most pro-LEAVE places in all of the UK,” said Roger Scully, professor of politics at Cardiff University. “Across Wales as a whole it will be very split between those who want to stay in the EU and those who want to go. But Newport and the southern Welsh valleys are pretty damned likely to come out as an outright majority to go.”

    If this is a protest vote, then there’s plenty here to protest about. Look up from Newport’s Commercial Street, and the honeyed architecture reminds you just how wealthy this city was a century ago, when it exported coal to the rest of the world. The swankiest hotel in town, complete with ballroom, has turned into a pound shop. Where there was once a jewellers now stands a vaping den. The M&S has left, to be replaced with a Sports Direct.

    In the temp agency’s window the magic number is 7.20: the national minimum wage on most of the cards for would-be warehouse operatives, security guards, forklift drivers. Peer down the street and you’ll see the transporter bridge dating back to 1906, its gondola still lifting cars from one bank to the other.

    When that bridge was built more than a century ago, south Wales was one of the big-earning regions of the UK. Now the coal and steel industries have either died or moved, and it’s among the poorest parts of Europe. For every £100 made by a Londoner, a resident of Wales makes £42, going by the calculations of gross value added. Whether under Thatcher or Blair or Cameron, Wales keeps falling further and further behind.

    “The folk memory of Thatcher destroying our communities is fading,” said Iestyn Davies, formerly of the Federation of Small Businesses in Wales. “Now it’s Labour that’s blamed for economic failure.”

    In Newport’s Victorian covered market, far more people were behind the counters than buying anything. The majority of the stall-holders said they were going to vote LEAVE. Did they consider themselves to be winning or losing under “the current system”, I asked, without providing any definition – and yet with no hesitation the leavers replied, “Losers”.

    On the comics stand, Terry reeled off what made him angry: benefit claimants in designer clothes, immigrants taking all the housing, and “Romanian gypsies”. He concluded: “I’m definitely a loser, because I’m financing other people’s lives.”

    The medicine usually prescribed for such post-industrial malaise is devolution, whether that be a “northern powerhouse” or an English parliament. But in Wales they’ve had devolution since 1999. A government with as much autonomy as a teenager in a loftroom, its presence has turned Cardiff Bay into a government enclave, complete with jobs and infrastructure and expense-account restaurants. Wales has its own equivalent to the Westminster bubble, observes Roger Scully: a Cardiff Bay bubble.

    Wales is where trickle-down economics and trickle-down politics meet ­– and driving out from Newport you see the lack of results. Instead, the hills that were black with coal waste in the 80s have now reverted to green. Where once there was mass employment there are now abandoned buildings and warehouse units for one- and two-man bands.

    At the village green of Cwmcarn, Kate and Casey were chatting while their boys played football. Again came the worries about immigrants. “They’re not even here two minutes before getting benefits and operations on the NHS,” said Casey. No, she’d never come across this personally. But it was a worry.

    By local standards, a lot more immigrants have been coming to the Welsh countryside from Poland and the rest of eastern Europe. But there were so few here to begin with that the numbers are still tiny. In Merthyr Tydfil ­– which in all of Wales has seen the highest percentage increase in immigration over the past decade – you are still five times more likely to meet a working-age adult on benefits than someone without a UK passport.

    However invisible the immigrants, they were mentioned by every leaver, in language that I once thought had been dropped in the 80s. “I don’t want to offend you.” Or: “I’m not racist.” Or: “I’ve got mates from Ghana.” Always followed by “but”. But we let too many in. But we need to look after our own. But I hear eastern Europeans turning up at the jobcentre are handed a grand.

    “I can’t help thinking that 23rd June is really a vote on whether it’s OK to be racist or not,” said Iestyn Davies.

    As in Donald Trump’s America, the collapse of the economy and the distrust of politicians has re-licensed opinions that would have been considered unacceptable until recently. And it has led to a new round of the age-old game of ferociously defending meagre prospects and entitlements.

    The very landscape of south Wales is littered with broken promises. The mining communities were offered hi-tech “industrial villages” by Labour. They never came. On the outskirts of Newport stands a giant white plant that was meant to be an LG factory. Millions in subsidies were poured in, the politicians prostrated themselves ­– and the Korean firm still bolted, leaving the site empty for a decade.

    Up the road, in the old steeltown Ebbw Vale, residents were promised a Donington-style racetrack, along with an unlikely sounding 6,000 jobs. The Welsh government pulled the project in April. But still, more wheezes are dreamed up. Better road links. A new shopping mall for Newport, despite a population without enough cash to spend in it.

    Do all this often enough and badly enough, as has happened in south Wales, and the age-old contract between the governing parties and the governed breaks.

    I can’t help thinking that 23rd June is really a vote on whether it’s OK to be racist or not"


As the daft idealism and astonishing incompetence of Empress Multiculti Merkel and her Brussels minions became clear, disaffection with the EUSSR became widespread, a poll of 10.5K Europeans reported in May (Telegraph, 9 vi).

It's not just the Brits: Euroscepticism on the rise all across Europe, major survey shows:

"Anti-Brussels sentiment has risen sharply all across Europe over the past year thanks to a toxic combination of economic stagnation and the mismanagement of the migrant crisis, a new Europe-wide opinion poll has shown.

The Pew Research Centre survey found that rising disenchantment with the EU is not confined to the UK, with Greece, France and Spain also having a majority with an unfavourable view of Europe.

“Euroscepticism is on the rise across Europe with about two-thirds of both the British and the Greeks, along with significant minorities in other key nations, wanting some powers returned from Brussels to national governments,” said the report.

The findings, based on surveys covering countries that account for 80 per cent of the EU population, will strengthen the arguments of Brexit campaigners that Brussels have been too slow reverse the federalist agenda of the 1990s.

In a sign that Europe’s publics increasingly want an end to the principle of ‘ever closer union’, more than twice as many people surveyed – some 42 per cent - said they wanted powers returned to their national parliaments as said they wanted powers transferred to Brussels.

“As the British head to the polls, just 6% of the public in the UK wants such an outcome. And only 8% of Greeks favour more power for the EU. The strongest backing for an ever closer Europe is only 34% -- in France,” they added.

'Much of the disaffection with the EU among Europeans can be attributed to Brussels' handling of the refugee issue, said Pew. 'In every country surveyed, overwhelming majorities disapprove of how Brussels has dealt with the problem.' This was especially true in Greece, which had been overwhelmed by migrants crossing the Aegean Sea from Turkey. Some 94 percent of Greeks believed the EU has mishandled the refugee crisis. In Sweden it was 88 percent, in Italy 77 percent and in Spain 75 percent.

Worse still for peecee globalizers, the Tories’ favorite pollster predicted (7 vi) that Britain would vote to leave the European Union. Lord Hayward, one of the few election experts who had predicted a Conservative majority at the UK general election in 2015,  said that, unless something "substantial" changed, the "balance of probability" was that the nation would vote to LEAVE on June 23rd. The news from the respected analyst came as a blow to Downing Street in the final two weeks of referendum campaigning"


 Amid the week-long multiculti mourning – especially on the BBC -- for boxing legend Cassius Clay, ex-Mirror editor Piers Morgan, alone among commentators, supplied frank detail of Ali’s racism of the 1960s. Not only were White males (“rattlesnakes”) to be killed, but also any Black females who “messed” (had sex) with them. Perhaps unsurprisingly, loose-talking Ali and Donald Trump were friends for decades, with Trump calling Ali “the greatest supericon of my life” and Ali attending one of Trump’s weddings.


 Just three days after being denounced by the Archbishop of Canterbury for mentioning that Syrian ‘refugees’, invited by Daft Dave, might prove as sexually predatory in Britain as they had in Cologne at New Year, UKIP hero Nigel Farage had the satisfaction of Newcastle police charging four Syrian young men (one arrived in Britain only a month previously) with sexually assaulting two 14-yr-old girls at the central St James’ Park – just a stone’s throw from Newcastle United’s soccer stadium (Daily Mail, 11 vi).


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, June 06, 2016


After Britain’s only well-known and -loved politician, Boris ‘BoJo’ Johnson (Eton scholar and Balliol First), pointed to the thread of German domination in the history of Europe – domination involving Charlemagne [of Aachen, subsequently the coronation place of German kings, and still today in Germany], the Hapsburg family and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation [as German schoolchildren were still taught to call it] -- he was condemned as ‘ahistorical’ by the likes of Labour leader-in-waiting Hilary Benn and Thatcher-traitor Lord Michael Heseltine.

But was it wrong to say Hitler had pursued – if over-adventurously and belatedly in Russia (and without first subduing Britain ) – ancient traditions of German imperialism? What did Hitler himself say? Wikipedia:

"Despite his personal animosity toward [Kaiser] Wilhelm II, Hitler wanted to bring his body back to Berlin [in 1941, from Kaiser Bill’s Dutch refuge] for a state funeral, as Wilhelm was a symbol of Germany and Germans during the previous World War. Hitler felt that such a funeral would demonstrate to the Germans the direct descent of the Third Reich from the old German Empire"

Astonishingly, Mad Mutti Merkel troubled herself to reply to BoJo’s observations: the UK  ‘BREXIT?’ referendum was “completely unnecessary,” said the fat and frumpy Fuehrerin – her authoritarian interventionism being specially remarked in the Telegraph (4 vi) by Simon Heffer, one of Britain’s top twenty intellectuals who were Brexiters/LEAVErs.


  Europe faced a "populist uprising" if it were unable to show people it could control the migrant crisis, said former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove. He was speaking on the BBC's ‘World on the Move’ day on migration issues. Sir Richard also warned against offering visa-free travel to Turkish nationals, describing the move as “like storing gasoline near a fire”(BBC, 16 v). He wanted a Marshall Plan for north-east Africa, but insisted that the West would need to control the north African coastline “more aggressively” than hitherto.


 Commenting on the death of  ‘Mehemet Ali’ (Cassius Clay) at 74, US Republicans’ presidential candidate, ‘racist misogynist homophobe and Islamophobe’ Donald Trump, declared the sensational Olympian heavyweight pugilist to have been “a truly great champion” (BBC R4, 5 vi, 08:00).

In such magnanimity to the mainly-Black high school dropout and draft dodger who had joined Nation of Islam before succumbing to the Parkinsonism which marred his last thirty-two years, Trump showed himself perfectly capable of sweet reason about Muslims – in contrast with the purblind prejudice that he was widely assumed to be afflicted by the Ali-infatuated hysterics of MSM who themselves readily accepted the deceased as having been the wonder of the 20th century and a virtual saint despite his having supported complete racial segregation of Blacks and Whites and condemned as an ‘Uncle Tom’ a fellow Black boxing star who favoured race mixing.

Pressured by his managers, Ali had by the 1980s agreed to suppress his ultra-apartheid preference for Blacks and Whites to live in separate countries, and publicly adopted the incoming dogmas of multiculturalism and integration; but he always maintained that Whites would not really want integration since they would not want Blacks ‘integrating’ with their women; and he further exemplified negritude by his loudmouthed conceitedness, his rampant philandering and by endless battles with his four wives and children who, at his death, had lawyers ready to contest his will – very necessary for multimilliionaire Ali’s eldest son who lived on the breadline with his grandmother in downtown Chicago.

    Meanwhile, the cautious, bookish and kindly Lord Chancellor Michael ‘The Gofer’ Gove (the Edinburgh-born adopted son of an Aberdeen fish processor) came to the fore arguing with Jeeves-like comprehension, patience and tact as the increasingly nationalist LEAVE campaign moved into a poll lead (in the UK’s referendum about membership of EUSSR) despite MG being called on Sky TV (3 vi) – by Bengal-originated political editor Faisal Islam – “an Oxbridge Trump.”

As MG won over his studio audience – after an alarming start dismissing ‘economists’ altogether – it was evident that the Trumpian qualities of good-humoured frankness and intelligence were rather appreciated by the public when they managed to peek through the peecee shroud unfailingly provided (at taxpayer expense) by MSM.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, May 17, 2016


 Britain risked “flames” of racial and religious conflict because of a “liberal self-delusion” over the impact of mass immigration, the Black former head of HMG’s ‘equality’ watchdog Trevor Phillips (q.v.) admitted—if late in the day (Daily Telegraph, 10 v, John Bingham).

In a startling assault on decades of official multiculturalism and diversity policy, the founding chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission argued the UK was being allowed to “sleepwalk to catastrophe” by leaders too “touchy”, “smug”, “complacent” and “squeamish” to talk about race.

Drawing a direct parallel with Enoch Powell’s notorious “rivers of blood” speech, Phillips likened Britain’s politicians, media and educated elite in general to the Emperor Nero fiddling while Rome burned, unable even to recognise the “dark side of the diverse society”. “[Powell] too summoned up echoes of Rome with his reference to Virgil’s dire premonition of the River Tiber ‘foaming with much blood’,” said Mr Phillips.


 Britain’s ‘BREXIT?’ referendum got into full swing, with PM Daft Dave threatening that a LEAVE vote could end peace in Europe – i.e. precipitate World War III. In reply, LEAVE hero and Cabinet colleague Boris Johnson (‘BoJo’), as well as calling DD “dishonest” and “demented”, opined that the European Union represented a continuation of Germany’s age-old wish for empire – last manifest in the doomed efforts of Kaiser Bill and Hitler.

{Such dramatic speculations served to spare either side admitting complicity in years of low-IQ immigration and breeding, culminating in Mutti Merkel’s new millions of ‘Syrian’ rapefugees and in her already beginning WWIII with her provocations to Vlad the Impaler in the Ukraine and her siding with Turkey in the Solunni vs Shitite fight for control of Arabia.

But the dread topic of Black & Muesli immigration would surely surface as Europe’s social services were overwhelmed, as Whites had so conspicuously to behave like church mice under PeeCeee, and as competition-tolerant East Asia forged ahead economically and educationally.}

The lofty excitements of UK politicos were mirrored popularly in old-fashioned nationalism (vs the USSR’s early attempt at globalisation): the Ukraine won Eurovision with a song deploring Stalin’s evacuation of Tatars to Siberia – even though this evacuation of pro-German Mueslis had been a sensible move towards winning Russia’s Great Patriotic War (WWII).


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Wednesday, May 11, 2016


Having failed for a decade to stand up for race realism, free speech, Christianity or crime control – abandoning all these in a vain effort to compromise with PeeCee – America’s Republicans were g*bsmacked as The Donald [q.v.] advanced to make his unique blend of Muesli-contestant nationalism and socialistic job  [“jab”] creation their party’s political philosophy for the foreseeable future.

When asked by the Guardian (5 v) to describe the impact on the Republican party of Trump’s dramatic rise towards nomination, Rick Wilson, a prominent conservative strategist who worked on the presidential campaigns of both George Bushes, replied: “What Republican party? The party I grew up in is done, it’s over. As long as Donald Trump is the definition of our brand, it’s dead.”

At his victory speech in Indiana, Trump bragged that the Republican establishment spent $8m in its desperate attempt to stop him, including 60,000 negative TV ads which he called “absolutely false and disgusting”. But he added: “The people are so smart they don’t buy it. They get it.”

For their part, the Democrats—along with much of the West’s ‘political class’ – were left holding the baby of globalizing multiculturalism which had enriched the new slavers in the international statosphere but increasingly alarmed ordinary folk as its ‘principle’ of free movement of people was rapidly undermining the welfare states for which people thought they had paid with their own families primarily in mind.

All that remained was for The Donald to pull in female votes by supplying domestic assistance (e.g. from social science students, as part of compulsory practical work on their luniversity courses) and to be seen co-operating with Vlad the Impaler to bring WWIII to a swift conclusion (notably with the eradication of ISICK and hangers-on).


Can Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton? Yes he can!

Surely Donald Trump is going to lose to Hillary Clinton in a landslide? America's first female presidential nominee against a sexist pig should be no contest. Especially when she's a former Secretary of Sate and he can't pronounce Tanzania.

“Mr Trump was born for the campaign trail. It suits his egomania. He relishes feuds and thrives on controversy. He is a narcissist who loves being on stage”

At the end of all this hullabaloo America will have another Clinton in the White House and "The Donald" will crawl back to his penthouse in Trump Tower to lick his wounds. ‘Make America Great Again’ hats will soon be retro souvenirs on eBay and the Republican Party will look back on 2016 as the year it went collectively, but only temporarily, bonkers.

The bookmakers certainly think that's how it will play out. They have Mrs Clinton as odds-on favorite. So do the pollsters - they put Mrs Clinton seven percentage points ahead, which would mean a runaway victory. But not so fast. This race hasn't actually started yet, and when it does things are likely to change dramatically.

Over the course of about five months Mrs Clinton is going to be subjected to the kind of sustained attack no presidential candidate has ever had to endure.

The Democratic primary race has been, on the whole, civilised. Bernie Sanders declined to criticise Mrs Clinton over the scandal of her using a private server for emails when she was Secretary of State. In 2008, Barack Obama was less charitable when he ran against her, but there was still respect.

Mr Trump, however, is going to throw the kitchen sink at her. No blow will be too low. His campaign will be governed by the principle that mud sticks, and there is a lot of it to throw. He will dredge up every seedy detail stretching back the Bill Clinton years. Everyone remembers Monica Lewinsky. But what about Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, They are all about to become household names again.

Paula Jones, who sued Mr Clinton for sexual harassment, has already been spotted at a Trump rally. Most people have also forgotten what the Whitewater scandal was all about. Mr Trump is about to start reminding them in great detail. Dubiously sourced stories will soon start mysteriously appearing in supermarket tabloids insinuating affairs, corruption and chaos in the Clinton camp.

On the internet it will be much, much worse. Already several unrepeatable rumours are doing the rounds there. At the forefront of the effort to undermine Mrs Clinton will be Roger Stone, Mr Trump's political henchman famous for being a member of Richard Nixon's notorious Committee for the Re-election of the President (CREEP).

Mr Trump, who likes to give his opponents a moniker, has already settled on "Crooked Hillary" for Mrs Clinton. The longer the investigation into her emails goes on the more that will stick.

Then there's Benghazi. Mr Trump will hammer the message that it happened on Mrs Clinton's watch and she was "asleep when the 3am phone call came". Expect the majority of Americans with military connections, and that's a lot, to back Mr Trump.

And remember that, according to some estimates, 43 per cent of American households own a gun {so as to warn off Blacks in America’s many thinly-policed areas}. Mrs Clinton hates guns. Mr Trump loves them so much he sometimes carries one around with him. But Mrs Clinton's biggest problem may end up being herself. Senior Democrats admit she is an imperfect candidate. She readily admits to not being a natural campaigner like her husband.

Mr Trump, by contrast, was born for the campaign trail. It suits his egomania. He relishes feuds and thrives on controversy. He is a narcissist who loves being on stage. When he sees television cameras his eyes light up and his mouth delivers perfectly formed sound bites.

In a country that lives through its television sets, Mr Trump will dominate the headlines and each day there will be a new outlandish diatribe against Mrs Clinton, played over and over again. Day after day he will also appeal to working class Democrats who have lost their jobs, vowing to bring those jobs back from China and Mexico if they switch sides.

Over time that seven-point lead will start to narrow.

Much will then depend on the three televised debates where Mrs Clinton risks appearing condescending toward her far less informed opponent, something that did for Al Gore when he lost to George W Bush.

Mr Trump will also have a special card to play. At some point during the debates he will turn to Mrs Clinton and say: "You're so crooked I was able to pay you to come to my wedding."

Can Mr Trump win? Yes he can.


After years of globalizing multiculturalism had served only to enrich international slavers, voters of the West began to assert their own basic interests. In America, ordinary Whites amazed MSM by elevating The Donald to have a chance on the White House; and Democrats split along identity lines, with women backing ‘Crooked Hillary’ and the young pleading for more of the pseudo-socialism that had turned their universities into ‘safe zones’ of political correctness run by maniacs for the new religion.

In Britain, Scots voted for Scottish nationalism (or UK nationalism – making the Conservatives the main opposition in the Holyrood mini-Parliament); the Welsh voted for Welsh nationalism (even winning the iconic Rhondda Valley from Labour) or UKIP; the Northern Irish became more tribalist than ever; and London’s Muslims (12% of the city’s residents) voted in a London mayor who had condemned moderate Mueslis as ‘Uncle Toms’.

In Germany, whose crackpot leaderene Mutti Merkel had offered the country as host to European civil war, the percentage accepting Islam as part of German life fell from its 37% in 2015 to a new low of 22% (Telegraph, 5 v). Yes, the disgruntled electorates of the West – knowing since the crash of 2008 that economics was a complete mess – were falling back on their more comprehensible and certain interests.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, May 02, 2016


 The most fearsome self-contradiction of multiculchalunacy exploded in the faces of its acolytes, yielding both a Mueslie MP and star Labour ex-mayor of London suspended from the party, Labour’s 2016 candidate for the London mayoralty accused of racism, and the party itself (especially in its university branches) widely suspected of antiSemitism under the cover of antiZionism (e.g. Daily Mail, 28 iv).

Labour had long been willing to wear the mantle of holiness that involved easy condemnation of the Holocaust and of any of Labour’s  serious political opponents as ‘Nazis’; but this caper finally became a victim of its own success as the resultant mass immigration temptingly swelled the numbers of Muesli votes far beyond those of Jews, as Mueslis generally maintained their historic antipathies to female wiles, to female education, to adultery, to homosexuality, to alcohol and to Jews, and as Jews themselves soon ceased to be the underdogs that they had so affectingly appeared in 1945.

Of course, the official leftist position was that it was Zionism that was opposed, not Judaism, let alone Jewry. But two generations of convenient multiculturalism had led socialists to support the Muesli takeover of Europe that was likely to be opposed only by Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump; and their multiculturalism had got them stuck with Islamist attitudes to and proposals for Jews that were indeed those of Hitler – who had in the 1930s encouraged and facilitate the relocation of willing Jews to Palestine, as Britain had agreed with American Jewry in 1917 to boost support for American entry into the First World War. Many in MSM, in pre-Corbyn Labour and on the cowardly multiculturalized ‘right’ were likely to seize the chance of fun.

By 29th April, a fifth of Labour’s Shadow Cabinet and a sixth of Labour MPs demanded publicly that the party’s only star, ‘Red Ken’ Livingstone, be expelled – even though RKL had done nothing but allude to the Haavara Agreement between Nazis and Zionists through the 1930s which had, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia, assisted the relocation of 60K Jews from Germany to Palestine.

More explosions were inevitable as holy multiculti Labourites learned that the attitudes of their belovéd Islamists towards Jews (and Christians and each other) were very far less civilized than those of Hitler. Said RKL: "How can the truth be an offence - if I had lied that would be offensive."“Everything I said was true and I will be presenting an academic book about that to the Labour Party inquiry,” he said.

The former London Mayor was referring to a book written in the 1980s by the American Marxist historian Lenni Brenner, who had noted there was collusion in the 1930s between campaigners for a Jewish homeland and the Nazis. Fanning the flames of Labour infighting, RKL said this 'history' was unknown to MPs of 2016 merely because "they don't teach it in Israeli schools".

In a further twist, he blamed his suspension on “embittered Blairites” who wanted to undermine his lifelong leftist pal Jeremy Corbyn (fourth-born champion of all underdogs – not least of Arab-Muslim Palestinians – and elected Labour leader by his desperate party in 2015).

He was strongly supported by the British left’s other star, ‘Gorgeous’ George Galloway (the only UK MP to have his argumentative skills commended by the US Senate).

Jeremy Corbyn’s director of strategy and communications, one Seamus Milne, weighed in with insistence that the foundation of the state of Israel had been a “crime”. The leftist Observer columnist Nick Cohen reckoned the “rot” of antiSemitism in Labour went deep (1 v):

"Go to any British synagogue or Jewish school and you will see police officers and volunteers guarding [Jews]. I do not want to tempt fate, but if British Jews were murdered, the leader of the Labour party would not be welcome at their memorial. The mourners would point to the exit and ask him to leave. If it is incredible that we have reached this pass, it is also intolerable. However hard the effort to overthrow it, the status quo cannot stand".

Hard indeed – to part with the millions of Muesli votes accumulated under the nice-looking banner of multiculturalism!


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 18, 2016


In increasing fulfilment of realists’ predictions, A/A pumigrant males from the 11K encamped on the border of Greece with Macedonia made a sustained effort to breach the razor-wired border fences, hurling rocks at police and returning tear gas canisters as they did so (Sunday Mail, 10 iv). The authorities escalated from stun grenades to the use of plastic bullets and water cannon, and 250 A/As were finally reported by French medics as being injured—making this the most damaging battle to date with Europe’s saintly invaders.


 Two generations of ‘rainbow nation’ stuff – about all ‘minorities’ needing to work together – met a dramatic end as the ‘revived’ Labour Party of the Yukay turned out to have got itself stuffed full of youthful anti-Semites who preferred to pull in the ever-larger numbers of ‘British’ Muslim votes – at whatever cost of losing LGBT enthusiasts and left’s own largely faithful feminists.

Meantime, in Israel, members of ‘far right’ European groups were received with open arms – attesting to recognition that  multiculturalism had become a mess – and that Jews would need every Christian help they could get against muderous Mueslis.

Personification of the European civil war which Madcap Merkel had unleashed so as to establish the age-old ambition of an oil-rich Holy Germano-Turkic Empire was achieved in London, where electoral competition for the Mayoralty of London would bring head to head Jewish scion Zac Goldsmith (Con.) and Muesli-backing ‘human rights lawyer’ Sadiq Khan (Lab.).

(Sadiq Khan had shared a platform with a man convicted of terrorism and a militant who helped to train the ringleader of the July 7 London bomb attacks, raising serious questions about his approach to Islamist extremism. Labour’s candidate for London mayor spoke at a conference in the capital in 2003 alongside Yasser al-Siri, who had been sentenced to death in Egypt over a political assassination attempt that left a young girl dead. Another speaker was Sajeel Abu Ibrahim, better known as Sajeel Shahid, a member of al-Muhajiroun, a terrorist group later banned in the UK. He ran a camp in Pakistan which trained militants to fight for the Taliban.)


Visiting the Greek isle of Lesbos to express sympathy with the hundred thousand A/A victims of mid-East civil war, general incompetence and failure to settle down under opthalmologist Basher Assad or other strongmen, the Pope was moved to invite a grand total of twelve A/As to enjoy the splendours of the Vatican. Apparently in line with new Catholic proclamations, the lucky twelve were selected not by need or merit but by the egalitarian principle of lottery.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 11, 2016


 A year after twelve of its staff were gunned down by Islamic fanatics, the brave Paris satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo came out with an editorial saying all Muslims were to some extent to blame for the horrors committed in the name of their religion (Daily Mail, 6 iv).

Equally, the magazine condemned the cowardly Western response to jihadic bloodlust, saying “....all of it is informed by some version of the same dread or fear...The dread of being treated as an Islamophobe or being called racist. Really, a kind of terror.”

Though Charlie did not identify anti-racism as merely the key component of the pseudo-egalitarian political correctness which so assisted slave-making globalization, its editorial made it the first well-known publication to break from the party line of the elite high priests of PeeCee that there was no general problem with Mohammedanism, ‘the religion of peace.’


As Führerin Merkel’s ‘solution’ to immigrant invasion problem she had created in Europe produced only a pathetic few score Mueslis agreeing to be ferried back from Greece to Turkey, the European Union’s plan to halt the migrant tide from Libya was also falling apart, with the naval operation in the Mediterranean failing to thwart traffickers and the desperate masses continuing to slip into Italy, officials told The Times (8 iv).

More than 19,000 migrants, mostly sub-Saharan Africans, had arrived in Italy from north Africa in the first three months of 2016, a huge increase on the same period in 2015. The surge raised fears in Rome that Italy would have to accommodate up to 270,000 new arrivals in 2016, particularly if Syrian refugees trapped in Turkey switched to the north African route.

    The EU’s naval operation, known as Sophia, was launched in 2015 with the aim of catching traffickers at sea with the help of a Royal Navy ship. Instead, it was spending most of its time rescuing migrants from the water, in effect making life easier for the traffickers, according to an Italian magistrate.

“The ships are patrolling very close to Libyan waters, allowing traffickers to send out unstable dinghies helmed merely by migrants because they know they will be picked up quickly,” said Carmelo Zucchero, who had prosecuted traffickers in Sicily. “We used to stop traffickers on the high seas escorting migrant boats, but we don’t see these organizers any more,” he added. “The EU is doing an important job saving lives; but if its primary mission is catching smugglers, it is not doing it — thanks to its own methods.”

    One Greek official, as angry as most of his countrymen with the A/A invasion, produced figures for the Mail (9 iv) of new arrivals to the camp on tiny Skiros island since the deportations began, and said that, for every migrant deported, at least three new arrivals were admitted after landing on beaches. ‘We sent 64 out by boat back to Turkey this week. Since then, we have had 152 new people coming in. The week before, we had 300 new arrivals. The numbers don’t add up. This whole exercise is a lot of garbage.’

    Further embarrassment for the traitorous, incompetent and authoritarian Mad Mutti was that Greek authorities had failed to persuade thousands of ‘refugees’ to leave their squalid conditions around the port of Piraeus for the relative comfort of frank detention camps where they could be prepared for shipping to Turkey (Daily Telegraph, 8 iv). Wishing to maintain appearances, the Greeks said they would wait at least a leisurely couple of weeks before using force.


Unremarked by cheerleaders for multiculti mixing, research by two Asian economists exploded the postmodern Western myth that nations should unfailingly be encouraged towards ethnic mixing.  While diversity of values was found positively associated with national levels of innovation in science and business, diversity of ethnicity had only a negative association (AmRen, 7 iv):

Bala Ramasamy and Matthew Yeung, Applied Economic Letters, February 12, 2016


Although the effect of culture on national innovation levels is well-established, previous literature assumes cultural homogeneity within a nation. In this article we analyse two aspects of diversity–ethnic and values–and their impact on national innovation output. We show that ethnic diversity or fractionalization and values diversity are distinct and while the former has a negative effect on innovation, the latter contributes positively. However, countries are bound to have both types of diversity. We find that countries that are ethnically homogenous but diverse in values orientation are the best innovators.

To which one AmRen correspondent helpfully added:

"It's FAR worse than that. Racial diversity reduces trust among the population, increases chaos and turmoil, creates disunity and inter-tribal hostility, but even more perilous than all those combined is the fact that no multicultural society in the history of mankind has existed for very long -- with most of them breaking up in bloody warfare"


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, April 04, 2016


 It turned out that the Anglosphere’s groupings of non-psychotic race-realistic thinkers and writers (such as American Renaissance, VDare and TakiMag) had happily been joined by ‘Alternative Right’ (alt-right), headed by Richard Spencer (AmRen, 30 iii) and making up for the demise of the once-vibrant ‘Human Biodiversity’ (hbd). Apparently the new group stressed the value of culture, tradition, hierarchy and intelligence; and it had invented the useful concept of ‘cuckservatism’ which had so enraged America’s ignoracist Republicans.


  Germany’s pumigrants had moved from being a challenge to being a problem. This was allowed to be admitted in the Guardian (1 iv, by the personally once-‘welcoming’ Konstantin Richter). “The EU has struck a complicated deal with Turkey that is meant to reduce the influx. It may or may not work. But whatever happens in the coming months, Germany’s Willkommenskultur – the belief that we should welcome refugees with open arms – has arguably come to an end

What’s more, the nation that took in more than a million people seems irredeemably changed by the experience – and not for the better. Germany is bitterly divided on the refugee question. Neighbours and families are divided. The poisonous atmosphere has been fuelled by rightwing hatemongers. But the adherents of the Willkommenskultur, in my view, are also to blame.”

Among the lesser problems posed by rapefugees were apparently educational levels of age ten, denigration of Jews, expressions of sympathy for parents only having daughters, and inability to say ‘thank you.’


 While Yankee and Britoid luvvies were beating their breasts at the ‘under-representation’ of Blacks among Oscar, Bafta and Wooftah prizewinners, it turned out that South and Central America had been swept for fourteen years by a ‘telenovela,’ Rebelde, centred on an elite private school in Mexico City and featuring an almost-all-White cast.

The soap pop sensation had been released on television in some two dozen countries (including seven in Eastern Europe) – but not in Yukay and not till 2015 in USA.


 Enthusiasts for intersexuality were cautioned by acclaimed British author Ian McEwan (Daily Mail, 2 iv). In a lecture for the Royal Institute about the history of ‘selfhood,’ McEwan rejected the notion that identity could be chosen as if from a supermarket shelf, complained of the culture of victimhood that was so often cultivated by the self-styled transgendered, and deplored free speech about such matters becoming restricted by students on American and British university campuses.

Tackling the idea that people are free to choose their identities as they wish, he claimed that humans were constrained by other things, such as biology, experiences and social norms. “I think,” he said, “there is sweeping through American campuses a kind of strange sense of victimhood and a sense of purposeful identities that we can’t actually all of us agree with.

Of course sex and race are different, but they also have a biological basis. It makes a difference whether you have an X or Y chromosome.”

His comments were dismissed by tranny spokespersons as “hurtful,” “offensive” and “dangerous” (Times, 2 iv). But his feeling that philosophies of ‘sexual fluidity’ needed  full and fair discussion was supported by the Moderator of the Church of Scotland, who came out against the proposed imposition of biological unrealism by Scotland’s First Minister who wanted ‘gender’ on birth certificates to become a matter of personal choice, allowing unrecorded and unauthenticated change of classification at any time and including an option of ‘non-binary gender’ (Daily Telegraph, 2 iv).


The Muslim-Christian clash of civilizations which PeeCee dared not admit achieved official form as mortar and artillery fire erupted in the disputed Caucasus area of Nagorno-Karabakh, killing dozens in two days of fighting (BBC, 3 iv). Wanton neglect of the need for clear separation between rivalrous ethnic groups had left the southern strip of Christian Armenia between the pincers of Sunni Turkey and Shi-ite Iran, and N-K as a Christian outpost within Shi-ite Azerbaijan.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.