RACIST GETS BOOST
As the anti-EU United Kingdom Independence Party closed with Labour in the polls (27%, 30% -- leaving Conservatives and Liberals trailing on 20% and 8%), Ukip’s founder, Dr Alan Sked, insisted that the UK’s nationalist leader Mr Garage was a “dim, alcoholic racist” who called a n*gger a nigger (Sunday Mail, 20 iv).
Dr Sked also claimed that Mr Farage admired Russian president Vladimir Putin because ‘Putin is clearly a nasty piece of work and Nigel probably identifies with that’. Thus was explained the 27% of Brits voting for Farage rather than for the debt-running peecee pooftahs of the British political mainstream – let alone for the wild exaggerations and bitterness of Dr Shed.
So why were so many shifting to Ukip? A sample list from one of several ‘Kippers’ to {yes!} the ‘lib’/lab Guardian (21 iv):
UKIP sovereignty and democracy v Liblabcon oligarchy
Smaller v big state
Sovereign v Britain in a superstate
Lower tax and spend v higher tax and spend
No political correctness or multiculturalism v political correctness and multicultural extremism
Defend Britain v illegal and unnecessary wars
Functioning democracy v broken democracy
Keep nation state v EU superstate
Controlled v uncontrolled immigration
Deal with illegal immigrants v let 1 million illegal immigrants stay
Welfare as a short term basic emergency v welfare as a lifestyle
Lower tax and spend and balanced books v higher tax and spend and soaring state debt
Common sense Britain v cronyism, quangocracy, charitocracy, bureaucracy.
Britain first v Britain last.
No instant immigrant benefits v immediate immigrant benefits
EU exit v EU
Emergency humanitarian aid v £60 billion every 5 years.
NHS with fewer managers and higher standards v NHS cronyism
Tough on Law & Order v Soft on Law & Order
No unnecessary foreign wars v EU/US expansionism
HEALTH CORRECTNESS TAKES A KNOCK
World Health Organisation alcohol expert Dr Kari Poikolainen, who had analysed scores of studies across decades of research into the effects of alcohol, broke with latter-day puritanism to urge people to take at least a bottle of wine per day – more in the case of men and experienced drinkers (Indie, 19 iv).
Apparently the endless anxieties and fat salaries of health lobbyists were quite unnecessary – and this was without Dr Poikolainen correcting for people under-reporting their actual levels of drinking when quizzed by white-coated researchers and doctors (thus artificially lowering health-fadists’ estimates of ‘healthy’ levels of consumption).
Express columnist Leo McKinstry added to the gaiety of nations by recalling Churchill’s observation that he had taken more out of alcohol than alcohol had taken out of him (21 iv).
{That drinking had been licensed by Jesus and St Paul was increasingly forgotten as state-funded environmentobabbling became one of the improving/idealistic replacements for religion.}
FROGS HOIST BY OWN PETARD
As multiculti France became famous for the mugging of tourists at cashpoints (e.g. near Notre Dame cathedral – Daily Mail, 22 iv) by gangs of gypsy children who would ‘swarm’ on victims, authorities began to despair, annoying anti-racist idealists. Charity and human rights groups were enraged when a leaked police memo called for the 'systematic eviction' of Roma from the centre of Paris. The leak followed the country's Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, saying that the ‘travelling communities’ of (mainly) Romanians and Bulgarians 'cannot integrate' and should be deported. A spokesman for the charity group Catholic Help described the note as a 'scandal', saying that it 'stigmatised a poor community' and amounted to 'racial profiling'-- something which was illegal in France.
WHO’S A NAUGHTY RACIST?
As Ukip’s Nigel Farage put out anti-immigration advertisements demanding ‘British jobs for British workers’ and was thus called racist by a Labour peer (the unheard-of Lord Dimwit), commentators soon recalled who had first made that demand in exactly those words. Yes, it was Labour PM Gordon Brown at the Labour Conference of ix 2007.
{Brown subsequently mended his non-peecee ways a bit too well and had infamously gone on in 2010 to be caught calling a middle-aged Labour woman voter a “bigot” as she worried by Eastern European migration to Britain.}
PEOPLE CAN BEAT ‘AFFIRMATIVE ACTION’
America’s Supreme Court upheld a state electorate’s right to ban the use of race in public university admissions, a decision that could rekindle the debate over flagrantly anti-White ‘affirmative’ racism and could clear the way for similar ballot initiatives across the US. The justices, in a 6-2 ruling, said they possessed no authority to strike down a Michigan law that had allowed voters to decide in 2006 that race-based preferences must play no role in public education, hiring and contracting (Washington Times, 22 iv).
WORLD COULD BEAT MUSLIM EXTREMISM
Rev A.R.P. Blair said the West should give up antagonizing Russia and China and concentrate on defeating Islamic terrorism (Guardian, 23 iv). {Rev Tone, President of Drawing All Faiths Together (D.A.F.T.), had organized failed ‘war on terror’ in Afghooniland and Eyeraq and sweet-talked his way to a £70M fortune from Arab businessmen hoping to keep the worst Muesli religious insanity under control while they made money; but he had yet to propose – let alone implement – any plan for blowing up mosques when Mueslis killed Christians or even for kicking out or just withholding welfare benefits from murderous mad mullahs found in the West.}
RACE EXISTS
As Cornwall won ‘national minority’ status from HMG (according to its interpretation of EU Balkanizing codswallop, and thus promising protection and funding of the Cornish language, religion and folkways), there was happy chatter about the “Cornish race,” people, heritage, and personality (BBCR4; Western Morning Herald, 24 iv). Evidently this race existed (or had come to exist) in the minds of some of the mere 84K people who called themselves Cornish and perhaps in the thinking of HMG – despite a previous Labour government having refused recognition as a ‘national minority’ since the Corns were not a “distinct race.”
Anyhow, contrary to leftist insistence, it was not just hereditarians of the London School who talked of ‘race’ despite conditions of overlap. Liberal Democrats were especially keen on funding Corns’ ethnic needs since – having agreed to their beloved EU’s destruction of the Cornish fishing industry -- they sought to reclaim votes from Ukip.
(The Cornish language had become extinct in C19; any distinct Cornish religion was unknown; and the only well recognized Cornish folkways were clotted cream teas – disputed by Devon -- and Cornish pasties. No Anglo-on-Corn pogroms had been recorded; and Cornwall’s economy depended 24% on tourism, mainly by Anglo-Saxons.)
{I owe a personal debt to Cornwall in that I was tutored at Oxford and later employed in Edinburgh by brain expert and evolutionist David Milton Vowles (known for his researches with ants and pigeons). But, no, over the twenty years through which I was in personal and near-daily contact with him, the great scholar neither talked about Cornwall and his Cornish childhood nor ‘identified’ as Cornish.}
WINDOW ON BLACKNESS
What Africans could be like (at least when Islamic) went on display as 234 nubile girls (16-18) went into their third week of abduction – probably by ‘Boko Haram’ [‘No to Western education]. Despite a further 44 girls having escaped in the course of being taken to a camp inside the Sambisa forest, Nigerian authorities and distraught parents on motor cycles failed to find where the 234 were being raped (or whatever) by the Muesli rebels; and the girls’ school attempted to placate relatives by claiming the girls had been found – a claim quite without foundation.
Still, despite these horrors of lasciviousness, cruelty, incompetence and dishonesty, the anti-racist Guardian paid a Nigerian to write that the abduction had brought out the best in the community.... (25 iv); and the story was kept off MSM’s front pages – presumably in deference to PeeCee. (The abduction followed quickly on the heels of Boko Haram admitting a rush-hour bombing in the capital, Abuja, killing 75.)
JARED TAYLOR
As the founder of American Renaissance prepared to try to hold the movement’s annual conference under tight security (against ‘anti-racists’) in Nashville, Tennessee, a nice review of his history and present views was provided by Jeff Lipkes in American Thinker (24 iv).
Any amusements? Yes: Yale-educated and liberal JT first saw the light about race realism when, as he quizzed a Black student in Liberia about why his country was so much poorer and disorganized than neighbouring Ivory Coast, he was told simply that it was because Ivory Coast had had the benefit of French rule.
The present? JT says Russian émigrés are astonished to find Americans more terrified of the USA’s diversity tyranny than ever they themselves were of Soviet Communism. And the future (in which he guesses America will become like Brazil)? --
“We will have a painfully stratified society, run by a mixed elite that keeps the masses of poor browns and blacks at a safe distance. Our rulers will continue to mouth slogans about equality and redemption-through-diversity but their lives will be even more hypocritical than they are today. They will live in fortified enclaves, and will increasingly see America not as a beloved nation whose destiny they hold in trust but as a herd to be milked. In 20 years, their cynicism will have begun to dull the patriotism even of Southern whites.”
In reply to Lipkes came an interesting claim from a correspondent: Jews were heavily involved in the medieval slave trade. Christians were abducted and trafficked into Islamic Spain by Jewish slave traders. But JT thought it unlikely that America would ever follow any European ‘white nationalism’ that was anti-semitic – cf Mr Farage’s distancing himself from France’s Front Nationale.
PEECEE EMBRACES CHRISTIANITY
In response to PM Daft Dave declaring himself some kind of Christian (for Easter) and saying Britain was a Christian country, R.Dworkin et al protested and LibDim leader Cleggover called for the Queen’s religious trappings to be ditched. However, tranquillity in the realm was restored as the great’n’good agreed that the key and welcome feature of Christianity was in fact ‘tolerance’ – despite Christians having sought revenge on Jews for two millennia, having run the Crusades to snuff out Islam from Jerusalem, having squashed key Hindoo practices of thuggee and suttee, and having proselytized China (yielding 1.3M regular open worshippers in the ‘Communist’ land); and despite Jesus having said that ‘he who is not for me is against me.’ {A high point of peecee farce!}
CRIME BIOLOGICAL
As experts in America and Britain pondered declining crime rates in recent years (e.g. from 1990) (e.g. BBC News, 22 iv), various explanations came to mind:
more criminals – especially Blacks – had been ‘stopped and searched’ and locked up;
more Black girls had started using the Pill;
CCTV use had provided the ‘supervision’ suggested as effective around 1970 (e.g. Brand, 1971, New Society);
binge drinking had been cut by price hikes on cheap supermarket cider;
‘concealed carry’ legislation meant any White might have a gun – giving Blacks cause to ponder;
people did not bother to report crime – which would remain uninvestigated by cops, especially if perps were Black;
cuts in leaded petrol had reduced brain damage for urban dwellers near roads – notably Blacks.
At least, decreased socio-economic equality was not the answer, since America had become more unequal than ever before as plutocrats gambled (with any losses made good by taxpayers thanks to the connivance of equally over-remunerated – i.e. bribed -- state functionaries).
-----------------------------------
Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.
-----------------------------------