AMERICA SLOSHES OUT
Determined to throw as much money to retardate Blacks as possible, mulatto Pres. Obarmy announced, at a Washington multifart drink-in for 45 Efrican autocrats and their 445 wives ooops secretaries, that he would shower $30B “investment” upon the Dark Continent – without the slightest requirement of return (though Barry did some finger-wagging about African bribery and corruption – about which he would have known from his Chicago experience). Mercifully, the hopeless waste of America’s White-guilt largesse would not require White boots on the ground or any other serious supervision – for it was not about empire or civilization or liberation but just about Barack Hussein’s ‘legacy’ as a Nobelist White-fleecer.
‘EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE’ FAILS BLACKS
Emotional intelligence, defined by Coleman (2008) as the ability to monitor one's own and other people's emotions, to discriminate between different emotions and label them appropriately, and to use emotional information to guide thinking and behaviour, was first hypothesized by Harvard’s g-doubting Howard Gardner as a form of intelligence that would give low-IQ people another chance to score. But this ability is weak in psychopaths, so according to Richard Lynn’s race realism (PAID, 2002; AmRen, vii 2002), Blacks would be expected to have lower emotional intelligence than Whites. This is what Whtman et al. found in a study of 209 Black and 125 White applicants for the job of firefighter, who were tested with the 16-item Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale. Whites scored significantly higher than Blacks at 6.41, with Blacks at 6.14, and the difference equal to approximately a third of a standard deviation (Internat.J.Selection & Assessment, vi 2014; AmRen, 25 viii).
‘CONSERVATIVES’ TO COMPLETE COMMUNISM
As if their cowardly adoption of peecee thought control had not sufficently wrecked their modest reputation for liberalism (which Mrs Thatcher had done her best to bolster), British ‘Conservatives’ (with incompetent face-lifted ‘nice, not nasty’ Topwitch Mudda Theresa May leading the charge), announced they planned legislation to jail husbands who were unduly “controlling” (e.g. requiring wives to show receipts for expenditure) (Telegraph, 20 viii, David Barrett).
Thus was further approached the communist ideal of destroying the family and making the state the only legitimate authority – though, sparing feminoids themselves from charges of bullying, there was to be no requirement that wives desist from over-talkativeness and nagging.
Already, Coalition legislation had intruded into personal, subjective and barely ascertainable matters by requiring that children should not be shown ‘cruel’ emotional indifference – in the belief that children would benefit from having parental judgment undermined and from their being cast upon the ‘love’ and intelligence of the state (which had already got levels of child literacy down to those of the 1890s). No squeak was expected from either official liberals or the Church at the proposed criminalization of husbandly discretion.
GENETICISTS BATTLE A Troublesome Inheritance IN Nature
Whingeing by scores of geneticists about Nicholas Wade’s Genes, Race and Human History (q.v.) reached Nature (26 viii), with supposedly leading luminaries complaining that their work had been misinterpreted. Details of what Wade had got wrong were in distinctly short supply*; but apparently one aggrieved academic thought there were fourteen races (rather than the five favoured by Wade and the mighty anthropologist Carlton Coon**), and all were adamant (without offering the slightest evidence) that there were (amazingly) no cognitive or civilizational differences at all between races ooops clusters.
{Poor Wade! – He wasn’t even given any credit for politely focussing on differences between Caucasians and East Asians and largely avoiding the far more dramatic and well-attested phenomenon of low African IQ and its sequelae.}
* A review in New York Times by David Dobbs (10 vii) had offered more hope for hysterical anti-racists by suggesting that defective genes were somehow matched by the “reparative epigenetics” of one Sharon Moalem. But Dobbs could not bring himself even to mention intelligence, IQ or any London Schooler other than Galton; and he had to admit that Moalem “tries too hard to entertain” and “is loaded with weird findings and great stories” {another Oliver Sacks, apparently....}.
** Darwin’s disciple, Thomas Henry Huxley, had also backed a fivefold classification (1870): Australoids, Mongoloids/Amerindians, Negroids, Nordics [‘Xanthochroi’], and fringe Europeans [the darker ‘Malancroi’].
(Historian-broadcaster Ben Shephard notes (2014, Headhunters): “All the great men of late-Victorian science firmly believed in a hierarchy of races; none more strongly than Darwin, whatever his modern whitewashers would have us believe.”)
PEECEE IN YOUR FACE
Thirteen years after 9/11, which was committed by Arab Muslims from Saudi, the American and British publics, which had spent hundreds of lives and thousands of billions of dollars pointlessly bringing demakrazy to ethnically divided Eyeraq, ordinary airline travellers were still deemed to need daily lessons in how Mueslis (even swarthy black-clad young male Mueslis) were just like themselves. As five thuggish-looking Mueslis were photoed boarding a plane from London to Turkey (en route for Syria) without any conspicuous interevention from ‘airport security,’ the Daily Mail’s Richard Littlejohn wrote (26 viii):
"....CCTV footage would almost certainly show middle-aged, middle-class men and women, on their way to spend a week in Marbella with their grandchildren, being subjected to intimate body-searches.
How many times have we seen young Asian men with backpacks pass seamlessly through security while Howard and Hilda from Hemel Hempstead are forced to stand and watch as the contents of their hand-luggage are examined with forensic precision?
Over the years since 9/11, I’ve brought you all kinds of daft stories about airport security. A few months ago, a screener at Heathrow even confiscated a tiny model gun from a model of Woody, the cowboy in Toy Story. Children aren’t immune from the ridiculous rules imposed from on-high by risk-averse imbeciles."
Mail reader John Thompson has copied me in on correspondence he has been having with the head of security at Edinburgh Airport after his heavily pregnant wife and two-year-old daughter were subjected to body-scanning equipment and intimate physical searches. He asked, not unreasonably, what security threat was posed by a child and her seven-months pregnant mother? Mr Thompson received a reply written in classic jobsworth-speak, which didn’t answer his main point. He wrote back, exasperated: ‘It’s time common sense was applied.’
Don’t hold your breath, John! Common sense plays no part in ‘security’. We keep being told that the war on terrorism must be ‘intelligence-led’. But all we get is stupidity, especially at airports. I don’t blame the staff, who are only doing what they are told on pain of the sack. It’s the fault of pusillanimous politicians and the ‘human rights’ lobby. It is also frighteningly easy for would-be jihadists to come and go as they please because of our dysfunctional border controls.
Thanks to the efforts of the Funny People, at least one of the ‘Britani Brigade’ caught on camera at Gatwick, Mashadur Choudhury from Portsmouth, was arrested when he returned home and is now languishing in prison. Apparently, Choudhury came back to Britain with his tail between his legs after ‘failing the Isis selection process’. Run that by me again. Isis has a selection process?....
CHINESE RACE FOR IQ LEAD Vice.com, 26 viii:
It’s not exactly news that China is setting itself up as a new global superpower, is it? While Western civilization chokes on its own gluttony like a latter-day Marlon Brando, China continues to buy up American debt and lock away the world’s natural resources. But now, not content to simply laugh and make jerk-off signs as they pass us on the geopolitical highway, they’ve also developed a state-endorsed genetic-engineering project.
At BGI Shenzhen [pictured below], scientists have collected DNA samples from 2,000 of the world’s smartest people and are sequencing their entire genomes in an attempt to identify the alleles which determine human intelligence. Apparently they’re not far from finding them, and when they do, embryo screening will allow parents to pick their brightest zygote [out of about a hundred] and potentially bump up every generation's intelligence by five to 15 IQ points. Within a couple of generations, competing with the Chinese on an intellectual level will be like challenging Lena Dunham to a getting-naked-on-TV contest.
{This enormous programme was a natural refinement of the eugenic policies being pursued for miles around Peking in the 1980s – by unofficially letting better-educated Chinese and Party officials off the one-child policy. As a committee member of the Galton Institute in the 1990’s, I had suggested China would welcome having its eugenic experiment monitored, guided and researched by the Institute [the former Eugenics Society] but the Galton was not interested.}
LOOKS AREN’T ANYTHING
The time-honoured methodological anxiety that twins might have their well-known similarities in personality merely because they look alike was examined by top psychologist Nancy Segal (California State University) (New York Times, 26 viii). She was able to compare the personal similarities of twins with the similarities of unrelated chance ‘lookalikes’; and found simply no significant similarities in personality between the latter – thus disproving the favourite environmentalist conjecture. Nor did the lookalikes form the special bonds readily found between re-united identical twins.
PERMITTED PAEDOPHILIA
Amazingly, it turned out that Rotherham (South Yorkshire) cops and child care functionaries had turned a blind eye to at least 1,400 cases of gross child sex abuse across 16 years – even though many cases had involved physical force, dousing with petrol, threatening with guns, grooming, trafficking, abduction, gang rape and forced voyeurism of other pre-teen girls being raped.
The vast majority of these horrid cases had involved White girls (usually consigned to children’s homes) being pursued by men occasionally admitted by MSM to have been ‘Asian’ (in fact Pakistani Muslim – as all but one were); and cops and social workers had been afraid of accusations of ‘racism’ if they took action (BBC News, 26 viii, 10:00).
Former Labour MP for Rotherham, Denis MacShame (lately imprisoned for fraud), admitted: “There was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat, if I may put it like that. Perhaps, yes, as a true Guardian reader and liberal Leftie, I suppose I didn’t want to raise that too hard.” He told the Independent (31 viii) that he had been threatened with the sack by Blair-creature Foreign Secretary Jack Straw in 2003 for saying that Muslims would have to chose between the British way or the way of terrorists” – a remark made after a south-Yorkshire Muesli had tried to blow up Jews in a Tel Aviv bar (though finally killing only himself).
Senior Rotherham officials had actually told juniors to set aside their anxieties about the barbarism in the interests of “community cohesion” (Daily Telegraph, 28 viii, Allison Pearson,* ‘In the face of such terrifying evil, who is the racist now?’)
Despite Labour pleading, no resignation was forthcoming from the Labour councillor in charge during five years of Rotherham’s children’s services – apparently, in his own mind, the requirement to be anti-racist trumped even the requirement to be paedohysterical, and anyway he had moved on to a £85Kpa job as Police and Crime Commissioner (which presumably gave him even bigger opportunities to shelter ‘ethnic communities’ accused of crimes). Nor did his replacement, one Joyce Thacker, who by 2014 was paid £130K for her troubles, head for the door.
The Guardian, while insisting that ‘some’ non-Asian perpetrators had been involved, called the 16-year tolerance “shameful” and “almost beyond belief” (27 viii). The journalists who tried to expose the (still ongoing) scandal had been denounced by authorities as liars and racists. Similar cases of Pakistanis treating White ‘in care’ weenies as contemptible prostitutes to be bought with sweets, ciggies, peach brandy and taxi rides (paid for in blowjobs while being taken to the homes of other abusers in the girls’ school lunch hours) – without fear of recrimination from their socialism-destroyed fatherless-family relatives -- had been uncovered in Rochdale, Derby and Oxford (Cowley).
By August, 2014, five Pakistanis had been jailed in Rotherham and a further 30 were under investigation (by a grand total of three police officers).
South Yorkshire cops had not been so slow to act in the case of Sir Cliff Richard (q.v.), sending twenty officers (and the BBC threw in a helicopter) for a five-hour raid of the pop superstar’s home when just a single accusation came their way of groping of a boy in the 1960s. By contrast, instead of going after the villainous Pakistanis, police threatened some of the Rotherham girls with charges of drunkenness and curfew violations at their care homes.
Rotherham, an old steel town near leftist Sheffield, with a Mayor called Shaukat Ali {!} and lots of ‘regeneration’ grants, had been Labour-run since 1933 (and had a longer history of ‘progressively’ supporting American separatism and turning the chapel of its rather splendid minster into, first, a town jail, and then a tobacconist’s shop). Though protest had given it eleven UKIP councillors, its vastly overpaid dim officials had felt enough confidence in PeeCee actually to remove an adopted child from parents discovered in the heresy of being UKIP supporters.
As MSM found itself forced into mentioning race, the BBC produced a lady social worker from ghastly 20%-Pak Rochdale (the early-industrialized wool town between Oldham and Ramsbottom, lately best known for the paedofumbling of its grossly obese comic MP, Liberal Cyril Smith, in the 1970s) to say that Muesli abuse of (overwhelmingly White) girls persisted “on an industrial scale” (R4, 30 viii, 08:45).
For their part, Muslims supplied the BBC with a video in which an (unseen) audience (perhaps at a mosque) called out their agreement with a nice young male speaker who suggested that paedophiles and police be brought to book for crimes of which the Muslim community had apparently been told nothing.
*AP was optimistic enough to volunteer that “Rotherham may be the final nail in the coffin of multiculturalism.”
‘LIBERALS’ LOSE THE PLOT
After fifty years of agreeing first to prosecute ‘race hate speech’ and then to let employers sack employees (even academics) whose free speech had got them into trouble with the tirelessly shit-stirring tabloids (which increasingly had little to do, since all racist, sexist, ageist, homophobic, transphobic, obesoid and other-disablist fair comments were effectively banned by them and by bullied politicos), Britain’s official liberals found their supine indifference to liberty was allowing the hounding even of people who had merely made private ‘remarks.’ Yes, a top footie manager (see below) was being hauled over the coals and dumped for verdict before the Soccer-moron Association (of goofs converted to ‘kick it [racism] out of fitba’’ so as to preserve their postmodern religious credentials) for verdict on and salutary reproof of his naughtiness in personal email.
(Needless to say, millionaire ‘Malky’ Mackay’s actual ‘remarks’ about ‘Chinks’ and ‘gay snakes’ could not be reproduced in any family newspaper lest their transparent blokeish jocularity cause laughter at MSM’s po-faced troublemaking. Even the Daily Mail, which had once contented itself with paedohysteria to win cheap approval, felt obliged to say ‘Malky’ was ‘in the mire.’)
‘SCOTTISH’ INDEPENDENCE
To the private delight of many Englishmen, the day of Scottish separation from the UK drew nearer as a nervous Labour ex-Chancellor (wheeled out to do battle for the UK since Labour had the most interest – in keeping its forty Westminster seats in the once-industrial areas of Scotland’s ‘Central Belt’) got shafted* in TV debate with a bumptious First Minister Fish (who had already for years beaten Labour for seats in the dreary fat lesbian Scottish Parliament – the only lively feature of which was its way-over-budget Spanish-designed Holyrood building with a leaky roof).
How was this possible? It was not that there was a racial difference, for the real race differences in the UK ran from west to east (Glasgow vs Edinburgh; Lancashire vs Yorkshire; Wales vs south-East) rather than from north to south. No, the real reason was that England (83% of the UK) had lost the Empire through years of fighting Germany (with massive Scots help) then gone on to bankrupt itself further, first with years of socialism and then free-market cowboying (as the only thinkable method of labour discipline) followed by the 2008 crash, all the while managing to lose its friends at once in Europe, the Commonwealth and America.
Though all-White south-Yorkshire was more ethnically homogeneous than all-White Scotland (with its religious, linguistic and lifestyle differences), it was understandable that Scotland, having kept together its vast rural estates with its teeming Glasgow-Irish tenements through the religious language of socialism, would think of taking its own chances rather than become increasingly like banker-led Black and Mohammedan England.
It would be a gamble, whether to rely on Scotland’s natified slave labour from Ireland (with a sorry propensity to die at 54) or on the evidently unassimilable third-world hordes of England; but the globalization-backing City of London was prepared to take it – when even the Labour Party had lost its grip on Clotland. Whether nationalism or multiculturalism would be more successful long-term was uncertain (clearly HMG-backed casino-banking was more successful short-term); but (unmentionable and hoped-to-be-defunct) White racism and IQ-ism were not to be tried.
*A sample from Robert Henderson, our London correspondent:
"The second Darling vs Salmond debate on 25 August was even more depressing than the first. It might have been thought that having gone through one debate the palpable nervousness both showed the first time round would have been largely gone. In the event Salmond was less nervous, but Darling was embarrassingly anxious.
Whoever thought Darling was a safe pair of hands for this type of work was profoundly wrong. The man is woefully ill equipped for a one-to one-debate. Throughout he frequently fell into stuttering and even when he did not – which was primarily when he was reading from prepared notes – his delivery was leaden. When Salmond attacked him Darling seemed peevish; when the audience derided him or asked insulting questions he was utterly at sea. (example audience comment: “I think the fundamental difference here is that the YES campaign are fighting passionately for the future of Scotland; Alastair Darling and others are fighting passionately for their jobs”) Darling spent much of the debate staring blankly ahead like a rabbit caught in a car’s headlights while Salmond stood looking at him grinning insultingly. Darling also waved his hands for emphasis far too much, while his habit of pointing at Salmond was a sorry mistake.
Darling also got his strategy wrong by concentrating heavily, almost obsessively, on the point which he had laboured in the first debate, namely, what Salmond would do if there was a vote for independence and Scotland was denied a currency union with the rest of the UK . This is a seriously difficult question for Salmond, but there are only so many times a debating opponent can be prodded with the same weapon before the audience becomes restive, and restive is what they became here. The nadir of this Darling obsession came when the debate reached the section where the two politicians questioned each other. What was Darling’s first question? You’ve guessed it: “What is your plan B for the currency?” It was an open goal for Salmond who immediately taunted Darling with being a one-trick pony.
The way Darling asked questions was also feeble. Not only did he keep repeating the same things, but time and again, he allowed Salmond to ask him questions when he, Darling, was supposed to be grilling Salmond."
‘CONSERVATIVES’ COLLAPSING
As PM Daft Dave continued with the cowardly multiculturalism to which he had reduced his party and government -- seeing gypsy immigration doubling in a year, primary schools inundated by the high-quantity but low-quality sprogs of mad Mueslis and husbandless Blecks, Rotherham etc exposed as pandering to Pak rapism, and Britain’s threat level for terror attacks raised to ‘severe’ in preparation for the country welcoming home its jihadists from Syria – he suffered (while on his third beach holiday of the year) the sudden defection to UKIP (widely considered a racist/fascist/chauvinist/yagphobic/etc party) of respected MP Douglas Carswell – who honourably proposed to fight a by-election in his Clacton (Essex) seat to bring his constituents with him in his conversion.
Born in 1971, Carswell had grown up in Uganda, where his parents worked as doctors among some of the world's poorest people. His father, Wilson Carswell, a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, diagnosed the first cases of HIV/Aids in Africa in the early 1980s. Carswell went to St Andrew's School, Turi, in Kenya and then Charterhouse in the UK. He studied history at the University of East Anglia and at King's College, London. Before entering politics, Carwell worked in television and then investment management. He also worked in the Conservative party's policy unit while it was run by David Cameron.
RACIST AND PROUD....
Israel’s leftist newspaper, Haaretz, was shocked to find how little the multiculti-promoting agenda of American Jewry had proved influential in Israel itself (23 viii):
“For me, personally, Arabs are something I can’t look at and can’t stand,” a 10th-grade girl from a high school in the central part of the country says in abominable Hebrew. “I am tremendously racist. I come from a racist home. If I get the chance in the army to shoot one of them, I won’t think twice. I’m ready to kill someone with my hands, and it’s an Arab. In my education I learned that . . . their education is to be terrorists, and there is no belief in them. I live in an area of Arabs, and every day I see these Ishmaelites, who pass by the [bus] station and whistle. I wish them death.”
The student’s comments appear in a chapter devoted to ethnicity and racism among youth from a forthcoming book, Scenes from School Life (in Hebrew) by Idan Yaron and Yoram Harpaz. The book is based on anthropological observations made by Dr. Yaron, a sociologist, over the course of three years in a six-year, secular high school in the Israeli heartland -- “the most average school we could find,” says Harpaz, a professor of education.
However, Israelis were apparently happy to have their gene pool complemented by suitable semi-Gentiles (who had supposedly, in ancient history, especially in Russia, ‘stolen’ blonde Jewish genes, along with Jewish money....):
Her name is Alona Tal. She is a popular Israeli singer-actress and was born in Herzliya, Israel. After serving with the Israel Defense Force, she moved to New York and married a Hispanic film director.
Evidently, the Israeli-Jewish concept of race could be pretty all-embracing – though never including cousin Arabs.... How extraordinary that such flexibility of thinking coincided with the imposition of rigid anti-racism (i.e. anti-anti-Semitism) and multiculti guilt on the Whites of the West!
SELECTION REALISM
In response to a splendid Indie article detailing the exhausting lesson-planning and paperwork-filled 72-hour working week of the modern British skuleteacher (30 viii), an equally fine but more succinct reply appeared in correspondence:
"....the cause of this problem? Socialism -- and its malign obsession for "equality". Only a mad man would insist on mixed ability classes. Identify the bright, eager-to-learn children early on and focus on them. It's not our responsibility to teach non-English-speaking children. Their parents should pay for schooling until the child is confident in English in both its spoken and written modes. Put violent, disruptive and "special needs" children in separate institutions and keep them away from those who can, and want, to learn. 90% of this man's problems would then disappear."
{I cannot for the life of me recall any sign of ‘planning’ in the lessons – well, sessions – by the grammar school masters who won me three Oxbridge places and final college and state scholarships; and the only regular paperwork was for a weekly two minutes in the collection of dinner money. The masters simply conversed about what they knew – and had published in book form for any boys wanting to get into the grisly detail. Like a university, till exam fever took the lunis over!
Sadly, modern state schoolteachers only know socialism (topped off by finally repressive PeeCee) yet cannot blatantly teach this for fear of ultimate parental wrath – so they end up having nothing to say from the heart, and certainly no pictures of Nelson’s Emma Hamilton or Vermeer’s pearl ear-rings on their walls. – OK, I had to discover Goya’s and Velazquez’s nudes for myself. It’s called initiative + bookshops + the confidence of knowing what Magna Carta is, why Charles I’s head had to be taken off [think: high taxation to help the French fight the Dutch] and that all’s right with the world [apart from the Frogs’ usually daft murderous experiments in killing Christians].}
BUY A ‘BRITISH’ BRIDE -- £3,500
A weenie bride could be bought in Britain thanks to the spread of ‘Roma’ gypsies. Just £3.5K as a deposit would secure a nubile number, estimated film-maker Ben Steele (Independent, 31 viii). According to strict ‘Pachiv’ gypsy traditions, marriages could be arranged by parents considerably before the UK age of consent (16). Apparently: “On a windswept evening in late March, Sanko [48 and father of nine], his son Adrian [14] and other members of their family [which had moved to Oldham in 2012] travel to Esme's home, with a plan to formally propose the marriage to her family. Esme [15] has no idea what is about to happen. She still goes to school and, as far as contact with Adrian goes, she has had only one dance with him at a Gypsy Ball. Whilst some might see the beginnings of a teenage romance, for Adrian's parents a marriage proposal is the logical next step. Adrian's mum tells me about Esme: "She is a young girl. We'll train her. We won't beat her. In a few years' time she'll be a patient wife."”
{Lib-leftie multicults and ‘modernizing’ ‘Conservatives’ could be thanked for this liberation of Britain from its strange old ways – though how feminoids would respond to Steele’s film (due for showing on Channel 4, 3 ix) remained to be seen.}
-----------------------------------
Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.
-----------------------------------
