As a Birmingham Tory MP candidate came under fire for Powellite sympathies, I wrote in to defend him (as did 500 others in the first six hours of the Sunday Telegraph carrying the story on the net) (published 4 xi):
Dear Nigel Hastilow, Well done to have the courage to speak out! Feel free to call on me to do what I can to help. You may like to prepare for your interrogation from Comrade Spelperson by looking at my article on Enoch at http://www.charlesmartelsociety.org/toq/vol1no1/cb-powell.html. Yours sincerely, -- Chris Brand (psychologist, author of 'The g Factor,' sacked by Edinburgh University 1997 for undue realism).
However, after criticism from party toffs George Osborne and (once-supposed-right-winger) David Davies, Hastilow resigned within hours of his Powellite concerns becoming widely known - despite his continuing to enjoy the support of his Halesowen constituency party chairwoman (BBC, 4 xi). The alternative presented by party chairlady Comrade Caroline Spelman had been for Hastilow to denounce his own remarks as "incredibly stupid" and to accept future gagging from Not-the-Conservative Party Central Office.
Infuriated at the Cameroonian backtracking on the gains of the few previous weeks (as the Conservatives had embraced a little tax-cutting and found themselves surge ahead in the polls), the Daily Telegraph's top columnist Simon Heffer said it was hard to spurn a candidate who merely said Enoch Powell had spoken the truth about mass immigration (as he had about the need for monetarism, the danger to the UK of devolutionary experiments and the unacceptability to the UK of the EU) and denounced David Cameron as "playing his part in the great betrayal" of Britain (7 xi), promptly sparking an enormous postbag (1000 responses, mainly agreeable, in the first 16 hours) and probably civil war in the Conservative Party. I joined in as follows:
Re Paula Smith, 17, 08:41
The 'immigrants' to Britain of c. 1000+ years ago were drawn from the dynamic aristocratic military elites of their European tribes/races. The Anglo-Saxons brought the 'witan' (council of wise men) and a rich art and literature and soon converted to Christianity. The Normans (Vikings), with an empire spreading into the eastern Mediterranean, brought the castle and stable government, working closely with the Church.
By contrast, all too many immigrants of the past 50 years were people who could not find work or wealth in their homelands such as Jamaica (mean IQ 71), Pakistan (84), Somalia (68) and Iraq (87). (Figures from R. Lynn, 2006, 'IQ and Global Inequality.') Understandably, many of these immigrants pose problems that will surely not be experienced from students from Poland (IQ 99).
Sincerely, -- Chris Brand (author of 'The g Factor').
At the same time, Labour `antiracist' busybody Keith Vaz accused Prime Minister Brown of `risking fuelling racism' by promising `British jobs for British workers' (Scotsman, 7 xi).
BREAST-FEEDING IQ BOOST TRACED TO GENE
The gain of perhaps as much as 10 IQ points that children enjoy if breast-fed (summarized in The g Factor, 1996, pp. 143-4) turned out to depend on have a gene, FADS2, that helps break down fatty acids - one child in ten lacks the gene so gets no IQ gain from breastmilk, found London researchers (BBC, 6 xii). {The researchers supplied no information as to the racial distribution of FADS2.}
SPECCIE CHASTIZED
Responding to the Spectator's feeble efforts `defending' James Watson and Nigel Hastilow, I wrote:
There's too much beating about the bush here. Rod Liddle's article doesn't even mention Blacks, Pakistanis, criminality, female slavery or IQ. Yesterday, I found I was barred from contributing to the Torygraph's 1,500 responses to Simon Heffer's defence of Hastilow, apparently because I mentioned that the average IQ in Jamaica was 71.
The right is failing to realize that, since Labour has seized the territory of religion (today providing the piety of political correctness, handily combinable with the world-slavery operation of economic 'globalization'), it needs to seize as it never did in the past the authority-giving territory of science -- which is unfailingly right-wing about race, crime, illiteracy, single-parent families etc. Science says let's go with what we know; let's select, encourage, breed for and genetically engineer high IQ -- whereas peecee piety says let's pray for utopia and burn the heretics. Time to take all Grumpy Gordon's cash for quangos, managers and welfare-dependents and give it to the scientists like the 'controversialist' Dr Watson (whom the Speccie hardly dared to mention)!
Recall: it was Britain that furnished Hume, Darwin, Galton and Churchill (all [scientific] racists to the hilt, of course). Now that the world and even the Labour Party has nominally accepted British idealism (plagues of lawyers, non-property-owning democracy, 'human rights', belief in similar `comprehensive' (mis) education for all) it is time for the Tories to offer complementary British realism (families, freedom, fighting and fun -- run only by a Parliament in which the Prime Minister would put in a 40-hour week).
ILLITERATE KIDS TO BE NAMED AND SHAMED BY NEO-SOCIALISTS
In a new manifestation of its environmentalunacy and addiction to `training,' Grumpy Supreme Leader Brown announced he would identify illiterate schoolchildren (80% of whom have low IQs) and oblige them to stay behind at school for an extra hour each day to receive special `help' (Daily Telegraph, 8 xi). So, having been refused during the day the slower-paced teaching that they need, these victims of non-streamed education were publicly humiliated and treated as only seriously naughty children were treated in the past. {The latest miseducational wheeze was accompanied by the further announcement that children would be bullied by the criminal law to stay in Britain's wretched socialist `schools' till age 18; and government adviser Sir Cyril Taylor further reminded Britain's few remaining thinkers of the environmentalunacy of the Brown regime by demanding that 17,000 teachers should lose their jobs for failing to meet the government's preposterous targets of every child being `first class' and getting to university.}
ANTI-PAEDOHYSTERIA RECALLED
I got a mention in despatches from `Hiro Protagonist,' 11 xi, who recalled my ordeal over child sex hysteria, about which it was even more dangerous to be realistic than about race.
NYTWITS WORRIED BY RACE-BIOLOGY LINKS
As discoveries of DNA differences between races increasingly leaked from laboratories into the public domain, New York Times columnist Amy Harmon told scientists (11 xi) they must prepare to put such race-realist discoveries "in perspective," i.e. downplay their significance as compared to social factors -- especially if, as rumoured by a Manhattan blogger, called Half Sigma [see 10 xi], there were DNA variations which linked race and IQ (see this diary/blog, GENE LINKED TO IQ - RESEARCHERS, iii 2007). "Research is exploring how DNA explains racial differences, but it could give discredited prejudices a new potency," said Harmon.
FULLER FIGURES VINDICATED
Fuller women may have smarter children because hip fat contains fatty acids critical for the development of the foetus's brain (New Scientist, 9 xi).
FLYNN EFFECT PARTLY DUE TO SMALLER FAMILIES
An article by top German psychogeneticist Volkmar Weiss included an explanation of the Flynn effect, namely that smaller families have provided relatlively better (more attentive) upbringing for their children:
".. in a representative study of the National Institute of Demography of France (Gille et al., 1954) it was shown that in any social stratum the average IQ of later-born sibs is lower than the IQ of first- and second-born. In any social stratum the seventh child of a sibship has an IQ that is about 10 points lower than the IQ of the firstborns. It is not that in any stratum the least intelligent parents have the most children; but if parents have to distribute their care and money among a larger number of children each later-born child gets less. From this we can conclude that on its own the decreasing and smaller size of sibships in the general population may have contributed heavily to the past phenotypic IQ increase appearing as the Flynn Effect."
{A negative association between family size and child IQ had been asserted/confirmed by Eysenck & Cookson (1971, Br.J.educ.Psych.), Ross & Simpson (1971, Br.J.educ.Psych), Marjoribanks (1975, Br.J.soc.clin.Psych.) and Zajonc (1983, Psych. Bull.) (who claimed the effect obtained regardless of parental SES).}
Weiss's suggestion formed part of an impressive and wide-ranging article documenting the eugenic upswings and dysgenic downswings of human societies. Just how such swings begin could be that the higher-IQ have evolutionary advantages and greater fecundity during harder times but that, as the economy then succeeds, the society tends to pull in slave labour which eventually wrecks the human environment until the higher-IQ once more have an advantage. But, be that as it may, Weiss was making the same prosaic empirical point as Lynn, Flynn and myself: that there was no genotypic 20th-century secular rise in Western intelligence. If so, action to maintain IQ (or to improve it, as in China) is urgently necessary - Weiss himself was minded to forecast doom for the West by 2030. And what about race? Yes, Weiss was not shy to back Dr Watson:
"He who believes . . . . that it would be possible to establish civil society in the Congo by general suffrage, shows only that he is a prisoner of the current spirit of the age. The same incapability misguides world hunger assistance and prevents proper action against mass immigration into the First World. In the last decades we have seen economic boom, just as with Europe before 1890, in states with authoritarian governments and a high average IQ, for example in South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore, or at least high variance of IQ as Malaysia."
MUESLIS and TROTS FALL OUT
From New Party Newsletter, 9 xi:
"It's always nice to talk about good news for a change, and so the end of the marriage-made-in-Hell between George Galloway MP and his Muslim fan-club on the one hand and the witless Trots of the Socialist Workers Party on the other is especially welcome.
A number of SWP members have apparently been expelled from Respect, although others are now claiming that Galloway himself has left the party. In fact, Galloway has seized control of the party office, changing the locks, while the SWP faction appear to retain control of the party website. So much for the Unity Coalition. Both sides are planning to hold their own party conference. Meanwhile the Respect group on Tower Hamlets Council has split, with the SWP group looking to join forces with - wait for it - the Liberal Democrats.
You couldn't make it up."
PEECEE GOON RETRACTS
Cash-spinning self-promoting peecee-pansy geneticist Craig Venter, fresh from studying his own genome, announced that he had underestimated human genetic variation by a factor of seven: humans differed on average not by 0.1% but by 0.7%, he admitted - while still denying that there were any important genetic differences between races (World Science, 3 ix). {It had long been known that humans share 50% of their genes with the average pickled onion, so an average difference between humans of 0.7% was massive - easily allowing the striking observed human differences in IQ, pulchritude and dong size.}
PEECEE CANADA EXPANDS
Ontario's `College of Teachers' stripped lecturer Paul Fromm of membership, and thus of licence to teach in Ontario (Toronto Star, 10 xi). Fromm had come to Jewish attention for his anti-Semitic views.
PEECEE LOON `EXPLAINS' BLACK-WHITE IQ DIFFERENCE
Worried that poverty might not be the explanation of Black underperformance at school (where Blacks do far worse than White even when SES is equal), top California education bureaucrat Jack O'Connell explained to 4,000 assembled `experts' that Blacks suffered "cultural ignorance" because they learned to clap and chant in church and thus did not attend properly in school.. (VDare, 13 xi). O'Connell's bottom line? - Blacks should be taught at a slower pace than Whites.... (San Francisco Chronicle, 12 xi)!
MATTHEW PRINCIPLE CONFIRMED
"To him that hath shall be given.." says St Matthew's Gospel, a principle sometimes noted by Arthur Jensen. Anyway, so it turned out as British education researchers found that `improved standards' in schools since Labour took office, when not due (as for two-thirds of the changes) to grade inflation and to pupils working harder, were attributable to investments in schools having pupils from better-quality families (Guardian, 13 xi). By contrast, children from poor families proved largely unresponsive to the squandering on them of Government largesse, according to research at Lancaster University which shocked Ministers to demand an urgent review of Labour's policy of renaming useless schools `academies' and showering them with new buildings, visual aids, computers etc.
PAEDOHYSTERIA CASTIGATED
As 80-year-old William Manahan, former Abbot of Buckfast Abbey (R.C.) in Devon, was jailed for 15 months after pleading guilty to eight charges of sexually assaulting boys at the Abbey prep school in the 1970s, a fine condemnation of such inhumanity and waste of police time was provided by top columnist Mick Hume in the Times (13 xi). A correspondent helpfully added:
"The late Dr Anthony Storr, psychiatrist and writer, stated that he never found that molestation was the primary cause of trauma; the damage came from the shame and rejection engendered by concerned adults. Action taken on behalf of a traumatised child within reasonable time scale is very different from such global trawling. Organisations for children are falling apart for lack of supervisors, choir training requires "chaperones", many choirs etc. are folding or have folded, with no taint of molestation, merely the loss of men willing to be accused. Though many children die in house fires, no smoke detectors are needed by UK law. This shows what we really think of child welfare. Yes, sex is profitable for media folk and frightens politicians into over-reaction. That, alongside fat compensation payouts, is what drives this obsessional, prurient farago."
MUSLIM `VALUES' APPEAL TO WESTERN TRAITORS
As the British Government failed to win its 5-year-long wars ooops conflict situations in Iraq and Afghaniland (supplying 93% of the world's heroin despite endless footling efforts by HMG's `drug czars'), it transpired that the National Health Service had supplied 24 free hymen reconstructions in 2006 to bashful Muslie damsels in Britain wishing to `maintain their families' honour' and deceive their marital partners (Daily Mail, 15 xi); and that King Abdullah bin Fahta of Saudi Arabia, welcomed at Buck House by Queen Brenda and Grumpy Gordon for his `vaaalues,' had been busy consigning to imprisonment and 200 lashes a 19-year-old Saudi girl who had been gang-raped - the rationale being that she had been seen, prior to the rape, sitting in a car with a single man.
WONDERS NEVER CEASE
American intellectuals were amazed to find that Slate columnist William Saletan was allowed to write an article doubting racial equality in intelligence (18 xi), e.g. including:
"..The New York Times told readers that when Watson implied "that black Africans are less intelligent than whites, he hadn't a scientific leg to stand on[6]." I wish these assurances were true. They aren't[7]. Tests do show an IQ deficit, not just for Africans relative to Europeans, but for Europeans relative to Asians. Economic and cultural theories have failed to explain most of the pattern, and there's strong preliminary evidence that part of it is genetic. It's time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true."
NYTwits were also allowed to be advised of the importance of genetic factors by a correspondent, Marty Nemko (18 xi).