The socialists of The Workers’ Paradise [Australia] abandoned the country’s ‘White Australia’ policy in the 1970s and, in line with a certain antipathy to Britain on the part of its convicts ooops Irish immigrants, began to let in hordes of migrants from wherever (who by 2011 had begun to fight each other – see previous).
Naturally, White parents took defensive action against the psychological and racial idiocy of their politicians; so the august Australian Review of Public Affairs recorded (v):
....there is a growing unofficial creed among many Australian parents that a ‘good school’ for their children is one where minorities are in the minority. And public schools are increasingly viewed as ghettoes.... Ethnic concentration and ‘white flight’ from public schools surface sporadically in Australian public debate, often focused particularly on public schools in rural areas and those in disadvantaged suburbs, which, it is argued, are being abandoned by Whites (for example, Bonnor & Caro 2007; Patty 2008; McDougall 2009).
The recent release of the official My School 2.0 website (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority 2011a) provides the most comprehensive data ever on the cultural diversity levels of all schools in Australia. These statistics show a clear pattern of cultural polarisation in schools across the board, including in wealthy elite suburbs, and suggest that Anglo-Australians may indeed have abandoned public schools in many areas.
‘PSYCHOLOGY’s ULYSSES WINS THROUGH’
My review in Intelligence (2011) of the latest biography of Hans Eysenck, Playing with Fire, by Melbourne leftist Roderick Buchanan (2010, Oxford University Press), became available on the net (albeit with gratuitous mistakes – e.g. claiming the book to be multiply edited -- introduced by the journal itself). A wee sample (without mistakes):
Sadly for his till-[1970] fantastic public reputation, g was to lead Hans into trouble. But Eysenck could not have known that the Burt Affair and race would prove such landmines in his path: far from Buchanan's idea of Eysenck seeking to provoke, trouble came naturally to theoretician Hans in spades. He did not ‘play with fire.’ He played the scientific game by every rule in the book; he simply saw ‘the big picture’ (as Buchanan sometimes admits); and was, as in his own words, a Rebel with a Cause — especially against the moaning minnows of his day.
IQ HERITABILITY BACKED
Despite months of efforts to oust him from Germany’s Socialist[-Democratic] Party for racism, top German banker Thilo Sarrazin happily refused to mince his words, saying that anyone denying the hereditary basis of intelligence was “vacuous or criminally lazy-minded.” (The Local [Berlin], 4 v)
BLECKS LECK PEECEE SPIRIT
South Africa’s Blacks, long supposed the partners of the West’s diversity pietists (Pres.: St Nelson Mandela), turned out to have a way with lesbians: they would rape them, even at age 13, in the hope of ‘fixing’ them back into the heterosexual fold (Sydney Morning Herald, 9 v).
FREEDOM FOR SLUTS – THOUGH NOT FOR DONS
While Australia’s academics cowered in their vestries ooops common rooms, unable to say a single open honest word about race, sex, IQ or paedohysteria, Oz feminoid uglies took to the streets in thousands, insisting on their right to show their knickers, flab, glasses and nosestuds in public, to have loud sex at every opportunity (mercifully occasional to judge by the looks of them) and above all to be able to prosecute for ‘rape’ any man to whom they took the faintest dislike (Sydney Morning Herald, 10 v, ‘’Sluts’ take to the streets,’ with visual aids).
The would-be sluts had been ‘outraged’ by a Toronto policeman who, asked to give practical advice to female luniversity students, had advised that, to avoid being raped, they should not simultaneously protrude their nipples, sit with legs apart, consume four cans of Carlsberg and be conspicuously without a boyfriend.... (Even one of the girls present at the talk had said the policeman was not trying to be funny or provocative but was just trying to help.)
ISLAMOPHILIA TRUMPS EVEN PAEDOHYSTERIA
Paedohysteria ran smack up against the well-known preferences of the Muslim world – whether for the ‘dancing boys’ of Afghanistan or the 9-yr-old child bride of ‘Prophet’ Mahomet himself. Thus mention of the prevalence of paedophilia under Islam had expressly to be banned; and Lars Hedegaard, distinguished President of the Danish Free Press Society and The International Free Press Society, was thus found guilty of racist hate speech under the Danish penal code. His crime? To draw attention to child abuse (and also violence against women) in Muslim culture (Spectator, 4 v, Melanie Phillips, ‘Free speech dies in Denmark’).
The Danish court convicted Hedegaard of racism for drawing attention to violence in Muslim families. The message Denmark thus sent out was that it was racist and a crime to seek to defend Muslim women and children from the phenomenon of ‘honour violence’.
Where were the Western feminists and defenders of free speech? – Vanished, as since 1980, when feminishts decided they must throw in their lot with the left which was deciding to pick up the Muesli vote (notably via postal votes which allowed a Muesli head-of-household to bully his entire family to vote socialist so as to secure more state-welfare benefits and tolerance of forced marriages).
REALITY DAWNS re AFRICA
As the bankrupts of Italy and Spain wrang their hands about the surge of young Black male ‘refugees’ from North Africa (as the Franco-Britoid-spurred ‘Arab Spring’ yielded no tangible change except unemployment and the burning of Egypt’s Coptic churches), it began to dawn that Euroland’s Common Agricultural Policy was playing a key role: unable to export food to the high-tariff European Union, Africans were bringing themselves over instead (Guardian, 11 v) (as in Jean Raspail, 1973, Le Camp des Saints).
Perhaps the CAP would have to go – and with it the whole EU racket. Perhaps even White imperialism would return, for African agriculture would need organizing (as the Chinese and Boers were already finding – the Chinese having at least a million operatives in Africa, and South Africa’s Boer farmers finding their services much in demand across the Dark Continent)
Further thinking along imperialist lines was stimulated by a harrowing BBC Radio 4 (11 v, 20:45) description of the wars for minerals [esp. heat-transmitting Coltan, used in many electronic devices] in the Democratic Republic of the Congo where 400,000 women (of 19 – 45) were raped annually (in addition to a further 400K claiming their husbands had enforced sex on them at least once) and children were routinely killed as witches if their bare-handed mining was unsuccessful.
(Quite a few hospitals had a whole ward dedicated to women who had been gang-raped by their fellow Blacks and then had their vaginas shot out with pistol fire.) Even the Beeb’s Guardianista correspondent, Johann Hari, thought some kind of framework of law, taxation and compensation provided by the West would be a good idea.
PSYCHOPATHS NON-EMPATHIC
Cambridge U.’s neurobabbling ‘autism’ expert, Simon Boring-Cohen (brother of comic genius Sasha Baron-Cohen, aka Borat) was taken to task in the Torygraph (by Alasdair Palmer, 17 iv (Seven)) for attributing* human cruelty to a lack of empathy, thus apparently denying “individual responsibility.” Yet psychiatrist B-Cohen was probably vaguely right, and might have even been reading The g Factor (Chap. 1), which detailed “the longest-running distinction between mental abilities” (tracing ‘tender-mindedness’ back to Shakespeare’s King Lear and William James):
....Classically, the Verbal-Performance discrepancy [in types of intelligence] was often held to be related to personality and to type of psychopathology – with delinquents, criminals and personality-disordered patients scoring relatively ‘low-verbal’ (accounting for the CIA’s long-standing interest in V-P differences when testing potential spies and informers). Typically, women are more ‘verbal/intuitive’ than men; likewise, women score higher on the moderately correlated personality measures of tender-mindedness, openness/imagination, affection, empathy, trust, idealism and aesthetic and religious values (Minton & Schneider, 1980; Sidanius & Ekehammer, 1982; Gibson, 1979; Vernon, 1982).
*In his 2011 Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty, Allen Lane.
ANTI-ELITIST AND ANTI-RICH (EXCEPT FOR FOREIGNERS)
Britain’s Camco Government, having agreed to continue with unaffordable vast numbers of agrammatical ‘students’ at UK luniversities, though charging the more eventually successful of them £9K for each year of their miseducation [for the luniversities were overwhelmingly ‘liberal’-leftist and peecee], while insisting lunis could only charge the £9Kp.a. if they admitted government-stipulated percentages of morons, created yet more muddle by banning lunis from selling any extra places at £20Kp.a. -- except to foreigners.... This was called ‘higher education policy.’ Why Oxbridge colleges did not break away from this muddle was a mystery – except in so far as they were as full of sh*t as HMG and the Yukay’s ‘education’ establishment.
ENGLAND FOR THE ENGLISH?
As local election and referendum results showed Scotland voting S‘N’P and England voting ‘Conservative’, a chance arose to separate the two discontented but at least not-entirely-socialist pseudo-nations, whose intellectuals did not believe in national character and whose politicians agreed on nothing more than the EU/German Empire project. Would the English -- who no longer needed their Holy Loch nukes [just outside Glasgow] or the near-exhausted oilfields of the North Sea [which anyhow could be claimed by the Shetland Isles] – take the opportunity to create a truly Tory Little England, free of Scottish (if not of Brussels) socialists?
(And why not get rid of Welsh socialists and the civil-war-addicted Northern Irish too? And what about Liverpool and Newcastle? And Sheffield and Birmingham? And East London?)
Sadly, healthy separation from unwanted elements seemed all too unlikely since, under PeeCee, no-one was permitted to spell out the chief attraction of the Celtic areas of the Union: that, in their high-drinking poverty and cold/wet climates, they had managed to stay largely White.
So, though every Scottish drinker knew England had been taken over by Blacks and Pakistanis (and the BBC and CofE by homosexuals), Scottish votes would favour continuing dependency (£20Bp.a.) on English money (to be extracted by bouncy First Minister Alex ‘Fishpaste’ Salmond, aka ‘Wee Eck,’ who had been among the first in 1996 to condemn The g Factor).
What a mess! Simple English and Scottish nationalism looked preferable – accompanied hopefully by liberalism towards long-standing residents having property and/or educational qualifications.
LA-LA PROFS RE-INVENT WHEEL
Apparently determined to show the need for massive Government cutbacks, several Oxford professors (incl. one Roger Trigg, ‘Centre for Anthropology and Mind’) burned their way through £2M of ‘research’ monies ‘establishing’ that virtually all human societies had a religion (depending how religion was defined), that co-religionism possibly made for trust and co-operation, that young children and the senile were the most ready to accept religion, and that country dwellers were more religious than townies (Telegraph, 13 v).
LABOUR TRIPLE-WHAMMIED
On the BBC’s top radio talkshow, ‘Any Questions’ (13 v), chaired by top broadcaster Jonathan Dimblebore, ex-P.M. Rev. Tony Blair was denounced as a “LIAR” by top author A.N.Wilson, following a denunciation (to the leisurely Chilcot Inquiry) of the famous 2002 ‘dodgy dossier’ (‘proving’ MadMan Insane’s ‘weapons of mass destruction) by a top UK intelligence official. This public assertion of the bl**din’ obvious completed a triple whammy against Britain’s socialists/welfarists who were already in deep doodoo for having followed America and let both public and private [‘subprime’] borrowing get hopelessly out of control (leaving trillion-pound debts to be paid off in the 2020s by the UK’s miseducated young) and for having run three conspicuously failed wars (in Afghastliland, Eyerak and the Balkans).
FRENCH SOCIALISTS WHAMMIED
In France, fresh hope of victory in the 2012 Presidential race was given to game Marine Le Pen, 42 – who had been edging into socialist territory by urging full state control of health, education, transport, energy and banking (not to mention the restoration of French secularism as against the ongoing takeover by the country’s seven million Mueslis) – as handsome playboy official socialist Dominique Strauss-Kahn, 62, IMF director, was yanked off a Paris-bound Air France plane five minutes before take-off from New York and thrown into a police cell and charged with attempted rape and ‘false imprisonment’ of a 32-yr Manhattan chambermaid (BBC Radio 4, 15 v, 09:00).
If the National Front could use this grave embarrassment for France to pick up even a third of socialist votes, e.g. from feminishts, Marine – already ahead of slimy globalist Sarkozy in polls – would have an easy victory.
------------------------------------
Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.
-----------------------------------