Sunday, July 27, 2014


The BBC’s plan to promote ethnic minority staff is racist, a Tory MP has claimed as he challenged executives to give their own jobs to black candidates if they are so passionate about diversity.

Philip Davies MP said the BBC’s “politically correct targets” discriminated against the white working class, who are also under-represented at the corporation but are not themselves the subject of diversity quotas.

He confronted Lord Hall, the director-general, and a panel of other BBC executives -- all of whom are white -- appearing before the House of Commons ‘Culture’ select committee.

After Lord Hall said the BBC must employ “as many people as possible from as many different backgrounds as possible”, Mr Davies rounded on the panel.

“I’m looking at you four. Which of you four are prepared to fall on your swords and let a black person have that job?” he asked.

“Show a bit of leadership and vacate your own jobs if you’re so passionate about it. Or does it just apply to everyone else’s jobs apart from yours?”

Lord Hall and his colleagues -- director of strategy James Purnell, BBC television controller Danny Cohen and non-executive director Dame Fiona Reynolds -- declined to take up the offer.

Mr Davies, MP for Shipley in West Yorkshire, joked that today was “a good day to talk about diversity” -- a reference to the Cabinet reshuffle in which a succession of middle-aged white men were shown the door.

Under new quotas announced last month, one in seven BBC presenters and actors will be black or minority ethnic by 2017, along with one in 10 managers.

Mr Davies said: “You are going down what I personally consider to be a racist approach.

“To me, the true racists are people who see everything in terms of race when what we should surely be is colour blind. Just as it is racist to prevent someone from having a job when they are black, it is equally racist to give someone a job just because they are black.

“It is a racist policy to get a certain amount of people from an ethnic minority into jobs.

“If I have a white, working class constituent who wants that opportunity . . . why should they be deprived because you’ve set these politically correct targets?”


 Seeing the green light that Britain’s pathetic multiculti rulers had given to Muesli suppression of women, Black gangs of London brought into action their ancient racial strategy of raping the sisters and girlfriends of gang rivals so as to show who was boss. Rape was reckoned safer than carrying knives or drugs – which could attract lengthy prison terms (Observer, 20 vii – showing the hoods but [in cowardly deference to PeeCee] not the skin colours of the merry mayhem artistes who would surely give London the fate of Detroit).


 After a century of psychologists et al. failing to find anything very much that predicted lasting romantic attraction (apart from similarity in IQ), a dating firm, ‘’ started following the advice given to E.LU’s Student newspaper {by me} in 2002 (13 ii): to look for complementarity. Using saliva samples from romantic hopefuls, Singld especially looked for prospective couples who differed in DNA markers (Sunday Mail, 20 vii). The first marker tested for was the serotonin uptake controller, which is involved in how people handle positive and negative emotions. The second marker tested for related to the genes influencing the person's immune system. The tests referenced on the website included an experiment at a Swiss university where males were asked to wear the same t-shirt for two consecutive nights. Women who had never met any of the men then smelled each t-shirt, rating the odours from most pleasant to least pleasant. The study revealed that the women reckoned the most pleasant odours (pheromones) to come from the shirts worn by the men with the Human Leukocyte Antigen gene sequence the most opposite to their own.


 Just why gypsies were headed en masse for welfare-state, self-destructive socialist Britain was exemplified as Bulgaria’s own cops moved in to bulldoze ‘Roma’ makeshift homes – even when the ‘travellers’ had brought in such symbols of domestication as having Sky-TV reception dishes (D.Mail, 22 vii). There were scenes of chaos and devastation as clashes erupted while dozens of illegally-built shacks were demolished in a Roma suburb in Bulgaria. Two people were reportedly arrested as the authorities moved in to begin to destroy 55 homes in the Lozenets district of the Bulgarian city of Stara Zagora. According to reports, three officers were injured as occupants of the site threw stones and tiles during the confrontation. In the previous week, Parisians had killed a Roma thief and left his body in a shopping trolley.


  Seeking to re-import hostility to Jews into Europe, 2,500 protesters, including Muslims and neo-Nazis — allied once again — showed up in downtown Frankfurt (which, during the Nazizeit, had taken a lead in getting rid of all its Jews) to scream about Israel’s defensive action against Arab frontliners Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Police reportedly helped out the protesters, allowing them to utilize a loudspeaker and a vehicle to shout anti-Israel diatribes. “You Jews Are Beasts,” read one sign; “Jews to the gas chambers,” read another. In Essen there were fourteen arrests of pro-Gaza enthusiasts.

In Austria, Arab-backers stopped a professional soccer match by storming the pitch and attacking Israeli players with flying kicks. In Britain’s Telegraph, Jewish columnist Emma Barnett said Jews had grown seriously afraid of expressing any pro-Israel opinion (23 vii). Meanwhile, in Paris, Muslims attacked two Jewish synagogues, including one in which 150 Jews had gathered to mourn the deaths of three Jewish boys, who were murdered by Hamas operatives. The Muslims, brandishing bats and chairs, attempted to break into the synagogue and ended up injuring several Jews. In recent years, thousands of Jews from France had emigrated to Israel, amid shocking reports of beatings, stabbings and an axe attack.

      {BTW, I find as I near the end of A Troublesome Inheritance (q.v.) that racially-quite-realistic author Nicholas Wade (Eton and Cambridge) is prepared, when discussing Jews’ intellectual spurt and enormous achievement in the past 3K years, to allow the heritability [presumably h²B] of IQ as being fully 80% -- an estimate as near to my own as I have ever seen.

No wonder Wade’s Eysenckian-without-the-Eysenck effort was criticized severely in the New York Times book review of Sunday July 13, where his fellow science journalist {and replacement at NYT?}, leftist father-hater and Proust-lover, David Dobbs [who believed high-n people were like ‘hypersensitive’ orchids which would flourish if given (by ‘society’) specially crafted comfy environments] called it "a deeply flawed, deceptive, and dangerous book", and one with "pernicious conceits" about the success of Whites (and East Asians).}


 After a half-century of nonsense (from the likes of ‘new left’ ‘anti-psychiatrists’ Glaswegian R.D.Laing [a big breeder, incidentally, though dying at 61] and South African David Cooper [surviving 'til 62]) about madness being due to ‘social factors,’ researchers seeking to unpick the complex genetic basis of mental disorders such as schizophrenia took a huge step towards their goal. A paper published in Nature tied 108 genetic locations to schizophrenia — most for the first time.

The encouraging results come on the same day as a US$650-million donation was announced to expand research into psychiatric conditions. Philanthropist Ted Stanley gave the money to the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The new study had involved 40K schizophrenics and 110K normals. Some of the correlated genes were linked to the formation of dopamine, nervous connections and the immune system. “It’s a stunning confirmation that there are many, many genetic factors” involved in schizophrenia, said Pamela Sklar, a psychiatric geneticist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York.


  Round One in the effort of England’s Department of Education to expose an extremist Muslim take-over of several Birmingham schools went decisively to HMG as teachers were nailed as Jew-bashing, Christian-bashing, yag-bashing, gender-bashing etc. A victory for intellectual Education Minister Michael Gove, then? Hardly, however, for, by the time the report came out, Govey had been sacked as a troublemaking critic of Shamoron and sidekick critic of the Tories, St Theresa May; it wasn’t obvious what to do with the offending teachers who if sacked would get Saudi cash to set up private schools with the same rights to by-pass English education as had long been enjoyed by Jews and Catholics; the reaction of Birmingham parents was awaited, and it would surely be violent; and the report just imposed a condemnation of extremism rather than specifying what ‘extremism’ actually was.

The truth was that, having allowed Muslim ghettoes, Birmingham’s socialist City Council was bound to find schools in them were dominated by Muslim parents, governors, teachers, sentiments and ideology. The report’s biggest achievement had been to collect clear acknowledgment from less extreme teachers that they had not come out with criticisms for fear of being called ‘racist.’ – White racist, that is; for brown-skinned Mueslis were entirely able to get away with hate-speech about White girls being prostitutes, Jews being dogs and yags needing to be stoned to death.

    Another indicator of how extricating multiculti Britain from its folly would prove well-nigh-impossible was provided as PR-man Daft Dave Shamoron appeared before a glossy London conference called ‘Girl’ to denounce Muslim efforts to deprive girls of education and their clitorises (a task at which British feminists had failed dismally for 35 years) (Guardian, 24 vii). But why – Mueslis would argue – had they not the same rights as Jews to teach the Torah full-time in Hebrew and to circumcise boys?

Soon the ‘British model’ of mild tolerance for other religions (so long as they remained discreet and showed respect for the West and the Queen) would be blown apart – as opponents of mass third-world immigration had long predicted. Tolerance, compromise and having your future king wanting to be ‘defender of all faiths’ could not long survive the invasion (invited by businessmen, politicos and pseudo-intellectuals of the media and luniversities) by low-IQ slave labour unable even to speak English and breeding like rabbits.


 After a summer of sporting disaster for England -- with its ‘Better together’ temperamental tennis champ Andy Murray bawling at his all-female team, its Black-admixed soccer hooligans doing little better than Scotland and its cricket captain repeatedly getting nul points -- the country got a little relief as it scored the first Gold medals in the Commonwealth Games with its muscly triathlete lesbians – though the Scots soon got revenge by taking Silver in the Cry-Baby-Shout-Out-Loud event (the winner was in Gaza Strip).

 Following a sixteen-hour display of world athletes taking ‘selfies’ and jumping about like 4-yr-olds who had just got out of bed, the ‘Games’ had opened its display of low-g specialized brawn (with not a game in sight – since squash could not be filmed and bowls was disallowed) with Q.Brenda’s Acting Deputy Vice Head of the 71-strong Commoncrash (which remained non-understood and non-controlled by ‘economists,’ as QB had pointed out to the LSE), a fat chap from multi-crashing Malaysia, failing to get the lid off the jamjar which had gone all round the world with QB’s ‘message’ which She proceeded to read once überathlete Sir Chris Hoy, another ‘Better together’ supporter, from Scotland’s capital, had mastered the art of the screwtop.

Other high points were ‘singing’ and jumping by greybeard rocker Rod Stewart, a Londoner who had well-and-truly freed himself from his ancient Glasgow roots, and pseudo-operatic warbling by an obese Scotswomyn who knew just the one song.

A high point was Scotland’s First Minister Mr Fish saying he would ludicrously re-name Glasgow as ‘Freedom City’ if it voted with him for separation from England (which had paid to settle Scotland’s vast debts in 1707). But England took a fresh blow as its Black superstar runner (away wid udder people’s cattle?...) withdrew from the ‘Games’ because of tummy trouble; so it would have to rely on its yag divers and ballet dancers and disabled athletes ooops ‘parathletes’....


  As a girl [a “posh brat” calling herself “a scientist, hula dancer and singer”) with a 2:1 degree (i.e. in the top 60%) from Oxford (Magdalen College) failed to get an offer after 200 job applications (ClassicFM, 25 vii, 10:00), it turned out that many White kids had (like employers) at long last begun to see through the uselessness of Britain’s peecee-leftist luniversities which, c.2000, had accelerated their dishing out of first degrees like confetti to ‘students’ prepared to engage in the national educational sport of rote learning and kowtowing to cultural Marxism.

 Research from the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service examined applications from 18-year-olds at England’s state-funded schools to start university in 2014. It showed that 31 per cent of White teenagers applied – compared with 61 per cent of Chinese, 45 per cent of Asians [i.e. Srindopakeshis] and 39 per cent of Blacks. The report compared the figures with those from 2006 and found that demand among Back teenagers had overtaken the proportion of White pupils applying. While the application rate of White teenagers rose from 25 to 31 per cent, Black pupils increased their applications more rapidly, from 24 per cent to 39 per cent (Daily Mail, 25 vii).


 Unusually in days of multicultidom, residents of the Central African Republic (abutting Sudan, pop. 5M, verging for years on genocide, with .2M displaced persons), including a Dutch doctor and a French soldier, were heard on BBC Radio4 (25 iv, 08:42) advocating the break-up of the country so as to separate Christians from bloodthirsty Muslims.

{Whether such realism was accompanied by acceptance of further ethnic cleansing was unclear, as was the trustworthiness of Mueslis to sustain a deal if one were made. The Christians were supported by 2K French troops – perhaps practising for what the mounting Muesli invasion of France would look like.}


 In days of violent paedohysteria, celebrities were understandably reluctant to tell the public that they themselves had been the perfectly successful survivors of child sex with kindly adults. But ex-President multi-millionaire and heart-throb Bill Clinton had the job done for him by his wife. As Hillary Clinton readied herself to run for the White House in 2016, a Pullitzer prize-winning journaliste decided to back Hillary’s social-environmentalist sob story of how her hubby had been led astray by ably head-giving Monica Lewinsky.

Apparently Bill had been regularly ‘abused’ by his mother and thus felt a need to seek for his abuser even in the arms of the most unsuitable women.... (DailyTelegraph, 25 vii).

{It was, of course, not unheard of or abnormal for mothers of the past to soothe their children with judicious masturbation; but what the Clintons would make of this story getting out remained to be seen. Bill himself had always been most fond of his mother, writing to her daily to keep her in touch with his considerable achievements.}

    Similarly contravening paedohysteria, a Manchester crown court judge distinguished himself by falling asleep during the first day of evidence in a witch-hunt of ‘child abuse.’ The trial had thus to be abandoned and a new performance re-scheduled at the cost of £10K to taxpayers.

So shocking to paedo-hounders was the judge’s boredom that the story even got reported on BBC World Service news (26 vii, 09:00). {I would need to learn from this, since I myself was summoned for high court jury service in E’b*gger – my excuse that I had limited understanding of Glaswegian not having worked. I would have to stay awake, perhaps resting my head on my NHS-supplied walking stick.}


As new economic figures showed Britain staggering out of the six-year Sub-Prime state-obliged Lending Crash and heading for 4% annual growth in GDP (which would be the world’s fastest growth rate), politicians welcomed higher tax revenues enabling them spend on their cronies.

Not so ordinary mortals, who knew they were actually worse off than in 2008; and indeed the new figures showed no growth in GDP per head since ‘growth’ was due to immigration from depressed Euroland, immigrant overbreeding, government-spawned inflation and continued reckless borrowing and spending.

Nicely, economic columnist Jeremy Warner, writing from New York, identified real optimism in the low-tax US states of Kansas, Texas, Nevada and Florida – though these states had not yet got around to the cuts in government spending which they promised (D.Telegraph, 25 vii, ‘Why Britain should follow the yellow brick to Kansas’).

But Britain, having embarked on unsecured loans of £27K to each ‘university student’ (50% of the age group, thanks to egalitarian piety) and on ‘private-public partnership’ commitments (to build left-staffed skules and lesbian-staffed ‘ospitaws) which would have to be repaid c.2025, was unlikely to take Warner’s advice, preferring more unskilled slave immigration at whatever cost to the future quality of life for longstanding residents and their genuine spouses.


 In a dramatic reversal of its century-long illiberal socialism, the New York Times admitted that self-righteous efforts to control marijuana (i.e. to ban it for all but the rich) had been as unsuccessful as the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s – merely limiting well-earned fun and increasing criminality (since only criminals could supply dope).

And, in the same week, the newspaper for loopily idealistic urban Democrats admitted the world’s enthusiasm for Western civilization (contradicting the ‘White guilt’ attitudes which the paper had so long promulgated) (24 vii):

"Worried about a surge in immigration {i.e. invasion}, the European Union authorities this year granted Spain 10 million euros, about $13.5 million, to reinforce the fences at {the Spanish imperial African outposts of} Melilla and Ceuta. Spanish officials have now covered them with wire mesh to make them harder to scale, creating an ever more elaborate obstacle course.

    The new measures, combined with more aggressive policing on the Moroccan side, have reduced the number of migrants who succeeded in crossing since May, but seem to have done little to deter them from trying. They attach hooks to their wrists and screws to their shoes for a better grip. Others climb barefoot. And so the game continues.

    Once at the fence–actually three fences, two 20 feet high and a middle one that is slightly lower–it is speed that counts, those who have conquered it say. Some jump from one fence to the next, but often make crashing falls. Most of those interviewed said they climbed up and down each to make it over. “You have to get over in one minute 30,” said Nili Onana, a basketball player from Cameroon, who made it over in a wave on May 28 and was interviewed in a short-stay center for immigrants in Melilla. He was one of about 2,500 migrants who made it over the fence in the first five months of the year, more than the total for all of last year, according to Capt. Juan Gallego Esteban, who has headed the Spanish Civil Guard border force in Melilla for the last five years.

    In interviews, both the {would-be immigrants} and the Spanish Civil Guard acknowledge that the mass actions are now carefully coordinated. The {invaders} said that before the jumps, they camp on the Moroccan side of the border for months, sometimes years, studying the movements of the Spanish border guards for patterns that might reveal any opening in the defenses. Among those watching the border were former soldiers, Captain Esteban said. The authorities have also tried to seed the camps with informants who can alert them before the assaults begin. “We can stop them when they come two at a time, but if there are 2,000 at each point we cannot,” Captain Esteban said. Increasingly, the mass jumps are aided by a talent for organization as well as social media and cellphones, the Spanish police and {Blecks} say. Those who fail bide their time, and try again."

Just why the West did not declare war on invaders and shoot them (and hang traitors who supported them) was unclear – as was the Spanish elementary failure to top its fences with lashings of barbed wire.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 21, 2014


  As sure as night follows day, the costs of Britain’s idiotic peecee-multiculturalism began to appear on the balance sheet. And there was only one word for them: tyranny of which the most far-out right-winger could be well and truly proud. The press was to be government-censored for the first time since 1688 – so as to protect the ‘privacy’ of sex perverts Hugh Grant and Max Mosley and expense-fiddling MPs.

Any Brit could be imprisoned untried for years in any Euroland country where an unevidenced accusation of ‘race hate speech’ or homophobia had been handed to gendarmes – such flagrant violation of Magna Carta being deemed necessary to protect the ‘rights’ of precious minorities. A bakery in Ulster could (according to legal eagles) be obliged to provide wedding cakes bearing the message ‘Support gay marriage’ – so presumably any Brit could be made to publish opinions that were contrary to his own.

100% state surveillance of personal emails was rushed through Parliament (probably in response to American demands for tighter security). And air travellers who already suffered 1-hour indignities of non-profiled strip searching by unsmiling officials (who would stop them travelling at all if they made jokes) had their agonies increased by demands that all their electronic gear be demonstrated as bomb-free and by the admission that airport staff thoroughly enjoyed themselves gawping at the nipple- and penis-sizes revealed in the searches that had to occur because Britain had admitted so many Blecks and Peks and allowed them to import illiterate wives and breed on the NHS.

{Naturally, Britain’s political class covered its peecee progress to tyranny by a gradual increase in placatory statements that immigration should be monitored and discussed and accusations of ‘racism’ limited – statements that were pure fart gas and yielded no action whatsoever to restore freedoms for which centuries of Brits had fought.}


 As Germany proved its mastery of British ways by a 1-0 win over the Argies to take the World Cup [for soccer], completing a Nordic triumph over footie-mad mulattoes on South American soil, it found its team’s ‘intelligence’ applauded several times in even the Guardian (14 vii, 14 vii) – which praised “intelligent forward thinking” and (twice) “intelligent design” though a majority of that paper’s readers surely professed to abhor the g factor. The Argies too were commended for great “tactical intelligence.” The Guardian even wrote of Germany’s “superbly engineered über-Europeanism” and “intelligently geared sporting system”; and of the team manager’s “highfalutin chat, the attitude, if not before now the medals of a genius.” Especially amusingly, exemplifying the unimportance of practice and experience, the winning German goal was scored brilliantly from a lightning extra-time volley by the youngest player on the field, Mario Götze, 22 (whose father was a professor – of technology, in Dortmund). Within twelve hours, the manager of mulatto Brazil – relegated into 4th place despite its 221M population – resigned.


 Following general comments (in ‘IQ & PC,’ some complaining) about top scientific journalist Nick Wade’s new effort to chart a genetically informed path between environmentocrazed anthropologists and eugenicist hereditarians, an extended listing of Wade’s beliefs looked as if it could be helpful – beginning with those more acceptable to the London School, as follows.

Biological factors are important. {Though, strangely, the main final overthrower of behaviourism, Noam Chomsky (who in 1967 demonstrated the innateness of grammatical language), does not get a mention in Wade’s book.}

Human races {of historically non-interbreeding families} do exist –- contrary to the ‘wisdom’ of 20th-century social science. The efforts of the Jews Franz Boas and Ashley Montagu are understandable {as a reaction to European persecution –- notably in Russia} but scientifically wrong. Even ‘geneticists’ like genome-wallah Craig Venter {and Robert Plomin, not to mention Wade himself till his retirement from NYT} “obfuscate” racial differences out of concern for their livelihoods.

Races overlap and shade into each other and sometimes interbreed. Some human races may soon become separate species despite modern travel and miscegenation of celebrities {for few want Blacks as partners}. The principal genetic differences between races are in allele frequencies. Race is strongly correlated with language.

There are three main races: Indo-European, East Asian and African {as the unmentionable Phil Rushton expounded}. Native Americans {like Australian aborigines} did not evolve much because their territories were empty and easy; Papuans because there weren’t enough of them {and, like South African Bushmen, they had chanced on special formulae for success –- Greek-style educative paedophilia for the former and water divining for the latter}.

Human personality has a definite biological basis, though co-evolving with human choices and creation of social environment. Personality differences can be traced occasionally to underlying differences in levels of such chemical agents as oxytocin and monamine oxidase, conveying respectively {such Big Six traits as} trust/friendliness {little a} and pacificity/depression {little –e}.

Racial differences are “copious and recent” but of limited significance. For example, E.Asians have an IQ of 105. The last sizeable difference to evolve was 15K years ago, when Tibetans became capable of living at high altitude. But markers of race are definite –- allowing 80%-correct assignment of race on just the basis of a few skull fragments (as Boas himself admitted).

Human differences in intelligence are substantially, though by no means wholly genetic in origin. {Attempts to quantify heritability [h²] are best ignored as incomprehensible to students, journalists and probably genomic experts....}

IQ differences are polygenic {as maintained by the unmentionable Hans Eysenck from c.1965}, so the failure of geneticists c.2000 to find any main gene for intelligence is no surprise.

Even if powerful genes for intelligence were discovered, there would be no need for racist thought since genetic influences could easily be “overwhelmed” by social factors {the demonstrated failure of all C.20 improving schemes like Head Start notwithstanding}. German IQ scoring increased from the 1960s to the 1990s {a ‘finding’ attributed to unpublished work by one Ron Unz}.

The world’s sudden progress to modernity – led by England, beginning c. 1780 – has some biological explanation. {Wade discusses this at length but is neither decisive or convincing  about what the explanation is. He thinks a ‘sudden population growth spurt’ led to brighter people having more children but cannot furnish detail, any more than an account of why a similar process never occurred in China. He might have been better acknowledging Weber (barely mentioned) and the Protestant work ethic; and recognizing that, post-1688, the Church of England allowed its priests (the only high-IQ and educated people in most areas) to be both prosperous and highly fertile.}

Cultural differences are chiefly in ‘institutions’, albeit deriving from the ‘slight’ basic biological/psychological differences between races. {The rice-growing-driven conformity of the Chinese can be ignored, apparently; as can the wide IQ spread in only semi-subjugated India which made the caste system the subcontinent’s natural main form of government. Again, Wade is neglectful of Islamic egalitarianism – which he rightly identifies as the cause of Muslims having to make slaves of everyone else – being due to polygamy (under which each woman fights for the rights of her own child); and of Western individualism and accepted hierarchy owing to monogamy and the recognition [in primogeniture] that a woman will normally invest [for reasons that Freud spotted, calling the phenomenon penis envy] more in her eldest boy.}

People are becoming less aggressive, more gracialized [with smaller jaws, lower murder rates etc]. {Here, Wade follows his rival in 50% progress to realism, the Jewish psycholinguist, Steven Pinker. But, in this matter, both ignore ‘institutions’ – for the peace of Europe since 1945 has been kept chiefly by states’ possession of nukes, imposing a merciful ‘cold war’ that will only be ended by Muslim intransigence and willingness to actually deploy such Pakistan-based weaponry against the Jews. Anyhow, physical ‘gracialization’ has apparently been most marked in Africa....}

East Asian prosperity is a myth {notwithstanding its enormous increase since the brutal wars and civil wars of the first half of C20 and E.Asians now taking up 10% of university places in the West}.

Racism is repellent and anyhow not available to scientists who deal only in facts {notwithstanding that psychology shows humans unequal in the most important and valued quality of intelligence....}.

The Wade-admitted sorry state of Africans and Arabs {not to mention Australian aborigines and Kalahari bushmen} can be ignored by biologists as having as yet ‘no proven scientific basis’ {even as the more entrepreneurial third-worlders stream into Europe at the rate of thousands per day so as to get away from the duller, poorer and more hideously and insistently cruel, superstitious, misogynistic and lower-IQ of their countrymen}.

Scientists deal only in proven facts {notwithstanding that 99% of science –- and 100% of environmentalistic theorizing} is probabilistic in nature....} so racism is wrong, wrong and wrong again. {Further protestation by Wade of his anti-racism (despite believing in races) appeared in Huffington Post, 30 v.}

Altogether, Wade’s was an impressive and scholarly effort – only lacking an application form for membership (and a quick ascent to leadership) of the London School and an appreciation of the big psychological variations in g (which provides the backbone of social hierarchy) and n (which assigns the more anxious group members to border surveillance and control). The trick of dismissing unwanted facts as ‘not proven’ was, of course, cleverly imitative of Boas himself; but Wade’s failure even to attempt to quantify his own favoured findings would fool only some of the people for some of the time. Few would long forget that the greatest (and richest) hereditarian psychometrician-psychologist, Raymond Cattell (1905-98), the master of factor analysis and personality measurement, earned no mention in Wade’s book despite Cattell having been committed to sociobiological, racial and eugenic thought and quantification as early as the 1930s.

For a round-up of reviews of A Troublesome Inheritance, see {I am indebted to a Luxemburger correspondent for this info.}


It transpired, as the Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence (Oliver Wilhelm & Randall W. Engle) got online publication, that publisher Sage had allowed a chapter (by Werner W. Wittmann) discussing the dreaded ‘group differences’ in psychology. An extract:

"Group differences in intelligence and related measures. Group differences in abilities, aptitudes, knowledge, and intelligence; their amount, origins in nature/nurture, impacts, and consequences in real life and what to do with them for job selection; and admissions to higher education are a “political minefield” (Halpern, cited in Kersting, 2003). Group differences is a most controversial topic in psychology and social sciences, in which a researcher can easily fall into booby traps, ruin or endanger his or her academic career, or at least get a finger burnt. A literature or an internet search related to names such as Sir Cyril Burt, Arthur Jensen, Philip Rushton, Chris Brand, William Shockley, Raymond Cattell, Richard Herrnstein, Charles Murray, and Hans Eysenck will hint at a comprehensive selection of controversies related to the topic of individual and group differences in intelligence."

Likewise, it was nice that The g Factor got star billing at ‘Psychometrics Links’:


 Feminoids, who had done precisely nothing over thirty years to resist the Islamic invasion of Britain (with its practices of FGM, enforced cousin marriage and female enslavement) found their pathetic ‘movement’ given some beef by ‘Britain First,’ a group of patriots who had, at least in their own minds, replaced the ‘collapsing’ British National Party and English Defence League. Identifying female equality as a core British value (OK: Boadicea, Katherine of Aragon [scourge of the Scots], Q.Liz I, Jane Austen, Q.Victoria, ‘George’ Eliot, Elizabeth Taylor, Mrs  Thatcher, Q.Liz II – though married women could not own property till 1870), uniformed heavies of BF gave the worthies of Crayford mosque, in Kent, a hard time – demanding in particular that the mosque strip out its sexually segregrating entrances within a week (Huffington Post, 15 vii). {A clever move, to muscle in on a moribund movement which had no cause since Brit women got the vote in 1926 and The Pill in 1960 and which was devoting itself C21 to voting socialist and putting more fat, ugly and disabled old bags on TV! Whether top feminoids would come round to agreeing with BF or have their hubbies’ cash to support it remained to be seen.}


 Having achieved nothing in his four Downing Street years apart from placating yag blackmailers and keeping bankrupt Britain borrowing, ‘Tory’ leader PM Daft Dave Shamoron sacked the remaining interesting members of his Cabinet (teacher-bashing Michael Gove and cigar-puffing Europhile Kenneth Clarke). Reckoning the Clottish referendum was in the bag thanks to women preferring UK security, DD aimed to win the 2015 General Election with a parade of agreeable smiling just-about-under-50 females who would present the desired PR image that everything was OK. The beaming Blairism of DD’s hero was thus to have its last outing before realism took over – turning the ‘welfare state’ into a proper insurance scheme, backing a Nordic League, and accepting that only Russia was likely to defend Europe from the Muesli take-over to which its unrealistic traitors to civilization had exposed it.


  Unchecked by Britain’s useless politicians, tabloid paedohysteria inspired Britain’s equally spineless police to arrest 660 ‘paedophiles’ (including teachers, choirmen, sports coaches, scoutmasters, lawyers, doctors, policemen, careworkers etc) following six months of inquiries (Classic FM, 16 vii, 12:00) – accusing them mainly of harmless downloading of ‘disgusting’ images (one young doctor had a million), and no doubt costing taxpayers at least £10K per arrest (not to mention the £100K per trial and £.5M per imprisonment) by cops who would rather operate from computer screens in cosy offices than pound the streets seeing the mess that hopelessly unrealistic egalitarian politicos had created (the latest arrivals being the fifty gypsies begging, thieving, fighting, boozing and defecating in London’s once-bijou Park Lane). A total of 9,172 computers and mobile phones were seized by the previously-unheard-of ‘National Crime Agency’ during the investigation, with 833 premises searched across the UK.


After years of importing 7M Mueslis, France had to endure the embarrassment of open fighting between Jewish and pro-Palestinian youth on Paris streets (D.Mail, 16 vii). After six Mueslis were arrested for trying to break into two synagogues, 150 supporters of the Jewish Defence League rampaged around the Place de la Bastille armed with broken furniture and pepper sprays, wearing crash helmets and chanting “F*** Palestine” as they pursued their quarry. Evidently the multiculti message of besotted French socialists, fondly believing in the secularism of the 144th Republic, had not been absorbed in all quarters.

    Meanwhile, in the mad Middle East, where Mueslis supplied guns, rockets and drones to Palestinians (on condition that their origins remain unprovable to Westerners, which could have led to suspension of American aid), the latest outbreak of Gaza vs Israel bombing bubbled along nicely, though likely to be superseded by Solunni vs Shitite hostilities dating back 1.5K years in the history of ‘the religion of peace.’


As the Western-contrived multiculti Iraq fell apart, even the Guardian – which had gone along with overthrowing relatively peace-keeping dictator Madman Insane and installing demakrazy – could be found admiring the ethnic autonomy which Kurds of the north-east had been able to seize from the horror story (17 vii):

One part of Iraq, however, has largely escaped the mayhem engulfing the rest of the country. It is Kurdistan, the autonomous Kurdish region of northern Iraq. Its capital, Irbil, is a haven of religious tolerance and relative safety. The suburb of Ainkawa, for example, is home to a large Christian community: nuns and a Chaldean church. There's also a pleasant beer garden where crowds gathered over the weekend to drink Efes and to watch the World Cup final on a giant screen.

    "Beneath Irbil's ancient citadel are cafes where those who are not fasting during Ramadan can eat lunch – shielded by a tactful white cloth. The city is predominantly Kurdish, but also home to Arabs who escaped from Baghdad as security deteriorated, and a recent wave of refugees who fled Mosul as Isis arrived. If there is a success story in Iraq, it's here."


 Despite the West having failed to pacify the Middle East, Mueslie-threatened north Africa and the China Sea, having suffered what some thought the worst financial crash since 1930, and having ditched most of its civil liberties in its guilty rush to suppress racism, sexism, homophobism, disablism and paedophilia, immigrants of dubious IQ and literacy continued to stream in – illustrated crossing the Med (above, 9 iv) and Mexico (immediately below, showing the decrepit freight train called ‘The Beast’ which brought 1.5K escapees from barbarism daily to the ‘border’ with the socialistified Useless States of America, at the cost of brutally enforced payments to Mexico’s criminal gangs – D.Mail, 18 vii).

{The traitorous ‘politicians’ of the West welcomed the third-world invasion since it maintained the fluidity which allowed their own criminal gangs [called ‘banks’ and ‘businesses’ – taxed [or rather, untaxed] offshore, changing their names annually and making multi-multi-millionaires of their supposed controllers] to flourish. No speeches involving political philosophy were any longer needed since PeeCee was enforced [with the gusto of the Spanish Inquisition] as an incontrovertible framework of unrealistic and illiberal ideas [for no criticism or even mention of Blecks and gyps could be tolerated]. Anyhow, politicos in mansions only had to meet immigrants when they became gardeners, waiters, drug pushers and nannies to the West’s new religious elite of mediocre farts in suits.

Central American immigrants get on the so-called La Bestia (The Beast – the ‘death train’ [as Mexicans called it] owned by Kansas City Southern Rail) cargo train, in an attempt to reach the Mexico-US border, in Arriaga, Chiapas state, Mexico on July 16, 2014.

Could these be the “unaccompanied migrant children” for whom President Hussein Obarmybinladen was forking out $50M of taxpayer dosh to provide a welcome holiday camp – equipped with 66 staff, tennis courts, jaccuzis and an Olympic-sized swimming pool? Indeed it could. Well, these and the other thousands of central and south Americans entering the States daily by other means! Pro tem., the illegals were sent without warning in unmarked [unbiographized] batches of 200 to astonished governors to assist the illegals’ delight in the USA and increase the joy of diversity in mainly-White states like Nebraska (Wall Street Journal, 12 vii).


 As Obarmamaniac America withdrew its worldwide policing services so as to concentrate on dishing dosh to Blecks and Specs, the national airline of Malaysia [IQ 92], not content with losing 300 of its passengers in the Indian Ocean, felt bold enough, in the absence of firm US guidance, to fly another 300 through the war zone of eastern Ukraine which had resulted from German ambitions to expand the territory of the EUSSR. Still, the resulting fearsome accidental carnage (as Flight MH17 was brought down) was amply matched in a couple of days of deliberate Muesli murdering in the Middle East (Front Page, 19 vii):

Jihadists have killed 270 Syrian regime fighters, civilian security guards and employees since seizing a gas field in Homs province. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights described Thursday's takeover of the Shaar field as "the biggest" anti-regime operation by the Islamic State (IS) since it emerged in the Syrian conflict last year. The watchdog, updating an earlier toll of 115, said it had documented "the death of 270 people killed in the fighting or executed" since Thursday. "A large majority of the men killed were executed at gunpoint after being taken prisoner following the takeover of the camp," said a reporter. "Eleven of the dead were civilian employees, while the rest were security guards and National Defence Forces members," he added. Abdel Rahman said a counter-attack by regime forces on Friday left 40 IS militants dead.

So who was going to get a grip? – Probably Russia which – if at great cost to itself, and with a certain official subscription to Lenin’s doctrine of political correctness – had managed to keep National Socialism and Islamism under control.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 14, 2014


 As paedohysteria raged in Britain, with virtually no-one prepared to acknowledge that trim young teenagerettes had always been attractive for (and attracted to) men, a rare case came to light of academics doing their duty of discussing the facts of life. The  Sunday Telegraph’s hawk-eyed reporter Andrew Gilligan got wind of a Cambridge University conference held in 2013 (6 vii):

"Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”    

Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds....

Cognoscenti would note the new name for traditional paedophilia (which term had been grossly overextended to include paedosadism with babes in their cradles). Even so, Gilligan’s piece would probably have sent quite a few Cambriensians scuttling back under their stones for cover.


The democratic and lawful government of Australia found its tentative move to re-introduce a White Australia policy would require a fight with holy money-grubbing taxpayer-funded High Court überbabblers who professed themselves uncomfortable with Oz returning Tamils to Ceylon (where the astonishingly co-operative Buddhist government was willing to prosecute its feckless emigrants who got their country a bad name) (Sydney Morning Herald, 7 vii).

{The Oz High Court decision to appoint itself in charge of immigration policy had the merit of showing it was not just the European Court of Human Rights that was the source of all silliness; and another merit in bringing out Queensman PM Tony Abbott to defend the Commonwealth principle of the supremacy of Parliament (under the Queen).}

{In fairness to the ECHR, that ‘court’ had graciously decided in the same week to allow elected governments to ban the berker in public places if they were so moved. But this concession to parliamentary authority would be much aided in the West if a robust Australia insisted that its state-paid legal-eagles pipe down (or, preferably, expire entirely).}


As British witch-hunting of  kiddyfiddlers reached a new high, with 115 top politicians, TV personages, military supremos, royals, sportsmen and civil servants being thrown on to the tracks for alleged hanky-panky in the 1970s, the exercise was at least doubted by one elite figure, the conservative-liberal ex-Cabinet minister David Mellor, writing in the Guardian (7 vii). Mellor, an ex-MP who had had his own experience of press persecution (over the details of his affair with an actress), properly pointed out that the 115 possible paedophiles had already been investigated and cleared in a 3-year effort by the Home Office which had met with satisfaction from the chief lynch-mobber of the time (one Geoffrey Dickens MP who could hardly pronounce ‘paedophilia’).

    {That Britain should embark on multiple multi-month ‘enquiries’ into ancient possible  naughtiness was beyond belief – except in so far as paedohysteria had become the major form of self-righteousness across two generations of socialism undermining the family and 50% of Brits obliging by divorcing, sodomizing, m*sturbating or just never marrying in the first place. Why could not just 5 of the 115 cases be re-investigated in a week’s work by a couple of cops, and – if they found nothing -- any dissatisfied puritans told to pay the bill for any fuller ‘enquiry’ themselves?

Where would it all end? Already the Queen was embroiled by her friendship with gifted and much-loved Oz knicker-fondler and neck-nibbler Rolf Harris; but, if the hysterics could not find more paedotolerance in the Royals (already Prince Andrew had drawn fire for his cavorting with distinctly youthful gals in America), perhaps the hysterics would demand ‘enquiries’ into and re-prosecution of Jesus – who was, after all, suggestively recorded in the Gospels as having spent the night alone with a naked boy whom He had resurrected and who subsequently was perhaps the boy with Him (in just a loincloth) in the Garden of Gethsemane [where Jesus was arguably nicked for paedophilia/pederasty with the boy and Judas] and (in white) at the Tomb of the Resurrection (Secret Gospel of Mark; Mark x 34; Mark xiv 50-52; Mark xvi 5; John xi)....}


 Northern Europe had cause for celebration as both the Dutch and German soccer teams got through to the world footie semi-finals, and with teamwork Germany sensationally beating mulatto Brazil 7-1 (albeit the Brazilnuts were hampered by injury to their star striker, by teeming rain and by their own wild fouls). Whether this fantastic victory would impress previously knocked-out EU countries (England, Italy, Scotland, Spain etc) remained to be seen; but for footie-mad Brazil (IQ 87 – Lynn & Vanhanen, 2006, IQ and Global Inequality, p.56; and £11B in debt for their enthusiasm to host the World Cup) and for fans of White-Bleck-Redskin interbreeding it was an utter humiliation unknown since tiny faraway Thatcherite Britain had trounced Argentinia in that country’s chosen Falklands War of 1983.

Riot police were called out all over tearful Brazil as a mob burned out a bus in the international crime capital of Sao Paulo; and German fans understandably sang "Deutschland, Deutschland, über alles / Über alles in der Welt". Nordic supremacy was further re-asserted as Holland beat Brazil 3-0 to win third place in the competition. And bookies offered 6-4 odds that Germany would beat the Argies and take the number-one slot.

More generally, 6K unaccompanied minors were fleeing to the USA each month to escape the mulatto criminality of Central and South America (Observer, 13 vii).


 At the risk of ‘re-inventing’ the wheel,’ researchers in Robert Plomin’s groups (at University College London and King’s College London) reported that attainments in reading and arithmetic among 12-yr children were strongly correlated and both 50% determined by the same genetic factors (Science Daily, 8 vii). However, new authority was given to such time-honoured claims by Plomin et al. drawing on no less that 2,800 British families – containing plenty of twins and children who had supplied DNA data. And the exercise provided a demonstration of just how much nature-nurture research could attract government funding so long as researchers agreed to talk up the importance of nurture and ‘education’ – and, of course, never to talk about eugenics or race (or indeed the g factor...).


A new popular book on the enduring plight of Black people in America was called simply Stop Helping Us! Its Black author, Jason Riley, detailed the striking argument that the efforts of Whites to solve the USA’s embarrassing racial gap, even if well-meaning and not just self-serving (to make comfy jobs for leftists), were actually counter-productive. That the ‘minimum wage’ kept young Blacks out of work and turned them to drug-dealing and crime and sexual fecklessness, and that ‘affirmative action’ pushed Blacks into university courses and jobs where they had high failure rates and dropped out were just two of the observations picked out from the book by (Black) Thomas Sowell in his welcoming summary (for star libertarian and race realist Lew Rockwell’s homepage, 9 vii).


A day after Britain won a £250M deal to supply rockets to India, the quid pro quo was announced by Chancellor George Osborne: India’s national hero Gandhi, a pacifist, was to be honoured with a statue in London’s Parliament Square – alongside the war-winning Lloyd George, Lincoln, Smuts and Churchill. Still, the oddity of this had been matched in Gandhi’s own life by his wanting to hand India to the Japanese and his getting a million killed in the frantic partition that followed his insistence on democracy (which left Muslims in a permanent minority – so millions of them fled to what became Pakistan).

Gandhi was also was an avid supporter of discrimination in South Africa. He only protested at it in so far as he thought Indians should be treated on the same level as the Whites, not the African natives. He also stated that the White race of South Africa should be the predominating race and many times stated that Blacks were no better than the Untouchables in India, where he intended to preserve the caste system (Daily Mail, 10 vii).

(Whether Gandhi shared paedophilia with another left-loved figure having his statue outside Parliament, Saint Martin Luther King, was a moot point – Gandhi usually had a lissome and nubile naked girl share his bed but always insisted nothing ‘happened.’)


 As pressures for more high-level action against long-dead ‘establishment’ paedophiles and Parliament produced two ‘inquiries,’ an inquiry into inquiries, and a threat by PM Daft Dave that he would criminalize any who failed to report suspicions of kiddyfumbling, columnist Sue Cameron bravely brought the terms ‘witch-hunt,’ ‘McCarthyism,’ ‘febrile atmosphere’ and ‘hysteria’ into play and especially mentioned an Australian warning [from Labour PR man John McTernan] that criminalizing non-reporters there had led to officials being “overwhelmed” by gossip as teachers, priests, TV celebs etc realized they had to cover their own backsides by generating a mountain of paperwork for legal contemplation (D.Telegraph, 10 vii, ‘Witch-hunts thrive in a climate of fear’).

(Meantime, Britoid paedohysterics went on their frothing way, complaining that the 80-yr senior judge [Lady Butler-Sloshed] appointed to run one of the inquiries was too much of an establishment figure herself and that her own 30-yr-dead brother [Sir Michael Havers, Attorney-General in the early Eighties] had once declined to prosecute a diplomat suspected of paedophilia who had a ‘connection’ with the Paedophile Information Exchange [a body which may have received as much as £.5M from the Home Office in those far-off days of sexual liberalism and research].)

{The idea of dealing with the multi-million pound mess by quickly passing a ‘statute of limitations – like most European countries (and which I had re the Gajdusek case) – apparently had no appeal to Westminster’s big spenders and their learned friends.}

    Happily, Sue Cameron was joined two days later by the mighty Charles Moore. He not only attributed Mrs May’s planned footling ‘inquiries’ to fear of the paedohysteria which parliamentarians had unleashed and of the public cynicism about politicians (on perpetual half-time, have handed Britain over to the EUSSR); but added that much of the interest in trying to track down unspecified historic paedophilia in high places by un-named figures with unknown results arose from a crude desire to link gropings of the Eighties to Mrs Thatcher.


 After a half century of primatologists preferring to avoid talking about the dreaded ‘general intelligence,’ let alone showing the intercorrelations between cognitive tests run on their animals, researchers in Atlanta, Georgia (led by William Hopkins of the Yerkes National Primate Research Center) bit the bullet and reported a clear, strong and human-like g factor among 13 mental tests given to 99 chimpanzees ranging in age from 9 to 54 (New Scientist 11 vii). Hopkins et al. measured ability in four broad categories: spatial memory and ability; tool use; communication skills; and establishing causality. Tests to remember which of three beakers hid food, for example, helped measure spatial memory, while challenging chimps to obtain visible but otherwise inaccessible food by attracting attention from humans helped measure communication skills.

By combining results from all the categories, the researchers calculated values for g. And, lo, chimp g turned out to be 53% heritable – just like the g factor in man, the authors observed. (The research group had genetic and other data on the animals’ likely relatedness.) "The historical view is that non-genetic factors dominate animal intelligence, and our findings challenge that view," said Hopkins. Chimp IQ differences could not, of course, be attributed to the socio-economic differences envisaged as so crucial by Western social scientists; and being reared by humans yielded chimps no advantage in g.


 The former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord George Carey, announced that he had come to support ‘assisted dying’ – in cases of ‘terminally ill’ patients being within six months of death for which they positively pleaded (Guardian, 12 vii). He thus broke with the preachments of most Christian churches (eager to dissociate from Hitler as once from imperial Rome) on the eve of a debate in the House of Lords on assisted dying. Empirical support for him came from Oregon, where assisted dying for mentally competent near-death patients had been legalized in 1997 – with one person thus suiciding per week, entirely unproblematically.

Religious support came from the South African CofE Archbishop, Desmond Tutu. {But the real problems were that low-g people – including many previously normal-g people who had contracted senile dementia [aka ‘Alzheimers’] – were not considered legally competent to choose death or anything else; and that low-g’s often had even no clear wish to die, living as they did (with the help of modern medication) from one ice cream or Teletubby episode to the next [as in the case of philosopher-novelist Iris Murdoch in her dotage].

In truth, the only way out of these problems was to give absolute guardianship of anyone with a Mental Age of less than 5 to a panel [composed of, perhaps, the chief inheritor, the ward’s GP [or deputy], and a close friend (agreed by the heir and GP)] which would be fully competent (by majority decision) to make life-or-death decisions, perhaps once per year. Only by taking g/IQ/MA seriously could the real dilemmas of euthanasia/mercy killing/assisted dying be confronted and handled. Obviously, the panel’s expenses would be met from the ward’s estate.}


 Leading psychologist Dr Noreen Tehrani, who advised specialist child abuse detectives in the Metropolitan, Surrey, Thames Valley and Hampshire forces, said police were under colossal strain from the escalating demands to investigate ancient paedophilia, requiring her to spend her entire time soothing cops’ frayed nerves.

She added that pressure from Westminster politicians forced police to divert attention from children at risk to historical cases. "They are just completely inundated with work, they are beginning to collapse. What I am getting are more and more exhausted officers. There aren't enough officers in these specialist teams and they are overwhelmed," Tehrani said.

The psychobabbler – whose own views on the merits of investigating past paedofiddling remained unknown -- said officers were on the point of collapse, with many going off sick as a growing number of historical claims of abuse increased pressure on already busy teams. She told the Guardian (12 vii) that she would be writing to PM David Cameron and Theresa May, the home secretary, to express her deep concern at the pressures the teams were under.


 Attempts to encourage more girls to study the sciences ‘completely deny human biology and nature’, a male academic claimed. Schools should stop trying to close education gender gaps because innate differences between the sexes mean they will always be drawn to different subjects and careers, according to a Glasgow University psychologist (addressing a beano of British educashunists, and reported in Times Educational Supplement).

Defying conventional peecee wisdom that had infected most psychologists, politicians and physicists themselves, Dr Gijsbert Stoet argued that Britain ‘probably needed to give up on the idea that we will get many female engineers or male nurses’ (Daily Mail, 12 vii). “Do we really care that only 5 per cent of the programmers are women?” asked the brave heretic psychologist. “I don’t care who programs my computers. A wealthy, democratic society can afford to let people do what they want.”


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, July 07, 2014


Fresh from paying dotty, daft and murderous Arabs to return to their Middle East, which they were busy destroying (q.v.), Australia took on the Britoid establishment as Rolf Harris, CBE, OBE, MBE, Officer of the Order of Australia, 84, and Queen Brenda’s favourite painter, was jailed for his ‘manipulative’ ‘paedophilic’ gropings of forty years previously (he even kept one pleasantly speckled young girl – a “spiritual healer” -- in the boathouse at the bottom of his multi-million Thameside garden, where she gratefully lived rent-free) (D.Mail, 1 vii).

The Irish ex-convict Republican media of Oz could (surely) be relied on to condemn the hounding of a great Ozzie who had never harmed a fly – and whom the hysterics of Murdochized Britoidia planned to prosecute further for yet more happy and harmless malfeasances.

    Ooops! The Oz press too had succumbed to paedohunting and ‘defended’ the Workers’ Republic’s best-known and most honoured export only by making little mention of RH’s case. So RH’s only published defence would be in the UK Daily Mail, insisting he was a thoroughly good egg who could go for years without conspicuous hanky-panky.


 Bleck oil-rich Nigeria, having descended into poverty and corruption in its fifty years of self-chosen independence from Britain (which had nevertheless spent a fortune trying to keep the oil-rich multiculti state together), gawped on aghast as its two-month loss of 250+ virgins was followed by Muesli Procul Harem seizing another 60 gals and bombing to bits the centre of one of the country’s unheard-of overbred cities, killing even more hundreds than Yoko Fartman had managed to slaughter in the previous couple of weeks (Guardian, 1 vii). Such was Black multicult incompetence – even without the assistance of Britain and Nobelist Obarmy.


 World footie host ‘rainbow nation’ Brazil, which had hoped to play up its ‘brown’ mutiracial credentials as part of the ‘World Cup’ fraud, found itself hauled up by the Grauniad (2 vii) for having hardly any Bleck faces among its soccer crowds. Though 60% of Brazilians were Black and they had been freed from slavery since 1888, they were not able to afford tickets at the slow-moving international spectacle which their (overwhelmingly White) masters had arranged. {So how had this economically divided country hung together? Why, they all spoke Portuguese – language being the one ‘bond’ that matters (q.v.).)


 The modern Britoid fashion for hounding and jailing elderly ‘paedophiles’, beginning with popstar Gary Glitter (and failing – except in E’bro’ -- to defend adoptive father-of-46, Nobelist Carlton Gajdusek), in order to demonstrate the saintliness of knicker-flashing newspapers, reached a high point as precisely no-one came forward to defend Welsh-parented Australian bottom-pincher celeb Rob Harris, 84. Even HMQ Brenda went into hiding with the (wide-mouthed) portrait that the much-loved moustachioed Ozzie had made of Her in 2005 (D.Mail, 2 vii).

And fresh rumours circulated of knicker-naughtiness in the House of Commons of the 1980s – possibly involving the later-promoted Lord Brittan, who may have consigned files on 114 high-flying paedofumblers to the shredder.

{Heaven forfend! Soon Queen-Empress Victoria would be hauled up for her Scottish assignations of the 1880s – accusations driven by self-righteousness, lack of printable news (about Britain’s abject failures in Afghooniland, Eyeraq and Euroland) and total cowardice about discussing Britain’s failure to deal with its own Bleck and Muesli problems.}

{Would Oz step up and defend its illustrious Groper Harris? No chance! – Australian independence, humour, tough-mindedness and scorn for Britain’s elite had their limits!}

* One ‘victim’ complained she had been “abused” and “attacked” by the genial Harris for sixteen years, during which the two of them had sometimes engaged in oral sex – all this ‘molestation’ having never led her once to complain to her doctor, her father or a policeman. – She was of course, in the paedohysterical jargon of the day, ‘traumatized.’


 Thirty years after everyone knew Black Mueslis were cutting off their girls’ clitorises in their effort to prevent adultery (a brutal practice which became politely and non-racistically known as ‘FGM’ – female genital mutilation), and Western feminists decided to take no interest in deference to the left’s demand for uncritical acceptance of all ‘minority’ ways, Britoid politicos got themselves front-page headlines for faint criticism of FGM and saying they would do something about it. {Like yanking 10-yr Black girls off planes bound for Nigeria where enthusiastic relatives would ‘cut’ them? You must be joking!}

    More civilized ways of controlling female sexuality were the Buddhist way of keeping all men in a monastery, the Hindu way of confining fertile women with their husband’s mother, the Jewish way of insisting full sex be with the rabbi (or psychoanalyst), the Muslim way of veiling, and the Western way of checking DNA. But the West’s wymmin had no more realism about the essentials of the human condition than had Freud a hundred years previously.


West Africans – paranoid about 60-yr-ended ‘colonization’ – declined medical advice and allowed the fearsome ebola virus – producing diarrhoea,vomiting and death -- to rip through them, killing 1.5K in a month as the minimal-IQ tribalists insisted on their traditional rituals of touching and kissing infected bodies (Guardian, 3 vii). Many thousands more deaths were scheduled.


 Emboldened by the European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg) deciding it was OK to ban the burqa – or at least the kneecap – leftie and feminist-fawning journalists came out to witter that (after forty years of their multiculti toleration of female enslavement, female segregation and female genital mutilation) they really quite favoured a little bit of facial unveiling so as to allow proper social interaction and inspection of how much bruising hubbies had inflicted (e.g. Independent, 3 vii).

{Such was progress for the feminoids and hangers-on as they got a legal green light to support integration over the primitive tribal practices of Mueslis who had never read the Koran – even if they had learned it off by heart. Whether lefties would ever get round to demanding the execution of Muesli traitors who travelled to the Middle East to train in suicide bombing so as to kill as many Jews as possible remained to be seen.}


  French police in Calais were arresting as many as 600 gyps/Blecks [cowardly newsies dared not mention the racial composition, but were still allowed by peecee thought police to display photos] in a single day after baton-beating them and bulldozing their camps – from which the ‘EU’-welcomed ‘immigrants’ tried nightly to smuggle themselves underneath lorries bound for welfare-state Britain (D.Mail, 4 vii).

It was a thankless task, said the gendarmes, since EUSSR slave-labour-loving ‘law’ allowed the third-worlders only to be sent back to their ‘point of entry’ into the EU – from which they promptly returned to Calais in their efforts to reach heaven-on-earth (for indigent paupers) UK.

Calais Mayoress, Natacha Bouchart, had long argued that Britain’s “generous welfare system” was the real cause of the migrant crisis in her town. {Master-race Germany stood idly by, presumably waiting quietly for other EU countries to destroy themselves by their pathetic peecee liberalism. How Hitler would have laughed!}


 A year of dire British failure (at rugger, cricket, soccer and tennis; and with the EUSSR united against it after 500 years of every schoolboy – perhaps not those at Eton – knowing Britain had to divide the Continent), the country – long thought a bastion of common sense, freedom and good humour – disgraced itself by jailing for SIX YEARS a much-loved and honoured Australian celebrity, 84, while not producing a shred of evidence of real harm from the venerated Ozzie’s attentions (one girl had let the ‘attacks’ continue for 16 years).

Meanwhile, short of news because no-one could explain the 2008-10 financial crash (in fact due to America compelling over-lending to Blacks), MSM busied itself with the possibiility of a ‘paedophile ring’ in Westminster of the 1980s – though all details had been properly shredded as unevidenced idle rumours by officials.

{Having netted such celebs as Gary Glitter, Max Clifford, Cyril Smith, Stuart Hall, Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris, how much further could tabloid paedohysteria go? Could deceased U-turning EUrophile PM Ted Heath (bachelor choirmaster and sailor) be the next victim? In fact, there was probably not a man in the country who could not be slung into clink for ancient ‘abuse’ if desperate pressmen – fearing the ever-growing internet challenge to their peecee ‘news’papers – were so minded.}

    And, no, the SIX YEAR sentence proved entirely insufficient to the paedohysterics of the Guardian, D.Mirror and BBC. Criticizing RH for putting his victims on the witness stand (where the worst the women could recall was RH having made them feel ‘dirty’ and ‘anxious’ as they returned for his next advances forty years ago), the hyperpunitive frothers appealed against the ‘leniency’ shown to RH (who had not left any tangible injury from his fumblings) and wanted him re-sentenced under any ‘guidelines,’ ancient or modern, which could at least double the length of his imprisonment and ensure he died in jail.

    The art world, too, moved to dissociate itself from RH – even losing his portrait of the Queen. For the Telegraph (2 vii), Andrew Brown observed:

"But is it right that a lifetime's art should be obliterated from the public consciousness because the artist who made the work happens to be a bad man? I can see the emotional motives behind that policy, but it does not make any sense. Once a work of art is made it takes on a life of its own. It is separate from its creator, and appreciated as an object in its own right. You wouldn't destroy a car if a worker in the factory where it was made turned out to be a murderer, would you?

Caravaggio killed a man in a fight. Wagner had some horrid views. Eric Gill admitted, in his diaries, that he had sex with his two young daughters. He also conducted "experimental sex sessions" (in the words of his biographer Fiona McCarthy) with his dog. Yet his monumental sculpture of Ariel and Prospero is a London landmark above the entrance to [the Beeb’s] Broadcasting House in Portland Place. And Westminster Cathedral authorities have no intention of removing his limestone, low-relief Stations of the Cross despite periodic protests.

    To which it could easily be added that the lives of many great artists left much to be desired: homosexuality (Michelangelo), paedophilic inclination (Shakespeare), underage girls (Vivaldi), brawling (J.S. Bach), polygamy (Schiller), V.D. (Schubert), unfaithfulness (Dickens), opium addiction (Baudelaire), self-harm (Van Gogh), pederasty (Wilde), drinking (Hemingway – and virtually all C20 American winners of the Nobel Prize for Literature), choirboys (Britten), smoking (Hockney), promiscuity (Lucian Freud) etc, etc.

    Thankfully the celebrated RH – though a great child entertainer rather than an artist of any stature -- remained dignified and stoical throughout his ordeal, evidently accepting there was nothing he could do about the feminoid Inquisition. At least he had the satisfaction of witnessing such 100% hysteria that it could not possibly be right."


  As explained endlessly by hereditarians to behaviourists (like M.J.A. Howe, e.g. in The g Factor, 2000, and in Brand et al., ‘Why ignore the g factor?’, 2003), even oodles of practice are correlated with only slight advantages in performance – perhaps 20% for sportsmen and musicians (some of whom practice all day long) but for only 2% in many other areas like arithmetic and reading (D.Mail, 4 vii).

The latest re-invention of the wheel ooops research to this effect came from Princeton and did not even control for the likelihood that superior performers were more motivated to spend more time practising. {Yes, Oxford of the 1960s educated me as a behaviourist so well that – helped by generous grants, pocket money for running rats for girls, and by a plum prison service job – it took me a decade to work out that behaviourism was largely rubbish.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.