Thursday, December 31, 2009


Making the Festive Season complete, the New York Times’ top (but race-avoidant) science columnist Nicholas Wade published a new book saying that belief in religion probably had a genetic basis (24 xii) – though apparently not mentioning that this had been reported as an empirical finding by Eysenck & Eaves in Nature in 1977, nor pointing out that different religions had different advantages and encouragements for suitable groups (e.g. Confucianism for hyperconformist rice growers, Mahommedanism for promiscuous wife-beaters, Judaism for elitists, Catholicism for the paedophilically inclined etc.).


Despite MSM’s efforts to tell America that the Detroit pants bomber (see previous) was “British,” the good folk of Kansas, at least, began to be apprised that the USA’s 50-year policy of funding Mueslis (in Egypt, Saudi, Iraq, Gaza Strip, Afghaniland, Pakiland etc.) had been a colossal multi-trillion-dollar waste (Wichita Eagle, 27 xii). Having failed to back Britain (and France and Israel) at Suez (1956), the USA had taken on imperial responsibility for the Middle East but had shot itself in the foot quite as badly as had the Russians in their own doomed failure to appreciate the racial realities and fraternal and Oedipal* hatreds of Muslim lands.

The difficulty that the slave-labour, slave-voter West had in bringing even the maddest Mueslis under control was illustrated as a 12-year-old girl was killed by hit-and-run driver Mohammed Ibrahim, after a judge had ruled that sending this Iraqi home to his West-protected country would ‘breach his human rights’ – given the murderous proclivities of his fellow-countrymen.

In London, the wretched ‘authorities’ did not even arrest the Principal [aka President, Provost] of University College,**** Kiwi ‘environmental lawyer’ Malcolm Grant, for questioning as to how his college staff could have failed over three years to detect pants-bomber** Mutallab’s lunacy. Meanwhile, the British Prime Minister and pals whinged on behalf of “British” drug dealer Akmal Shaikh, a Pakistani minicab driver whose “bipolar disorder” was meant to excuse his smuggling 4kg of heroin into China, which country was in the process of executing the Muesli (Sun, 28 xii).

* As in many cases of youths turning to terrorism in the West of the 1980’s (Germany, Italy, Ireland), Mutallab had fallen out with his (70-year-old) father and thought to impress his (step-?) mother (a young Arab from the Yemen***) that he was more true to family ideals (in this case Islam) than was the greying and compromising papa.

** Mass-murderous Black rich boy Mutallab (a graduate in engineering and business studies from Britain’s top fee-snatching college, UCL) had in fact strapped his bomb near his groin, beneath his underpants, reckoning that peecee ‘security’ personnel would be unlikely to search him in that area for fear of being called insensitive, homo, racist, Islamophobic etc.

*** By late-2009, the Yemen (together with its terrible twin, across-the-Gulf-of-Aden neighbour Somalia) was BinLiner’s base of choice – opening a new front that would probably require Peace Prize Nobelist Obarmy to reintroduce conscription. "Only Pakistan's tribal regions rival Yemen as a terrorist Shangri-La", the Wall Street Journal said in 2009, citing American estimates that up to 1,500 Al-Qaida-linked fighters were already based there – America having failed to terrify Mueslis to stop their murderous nonsense. In August, a suicide bomber had crossed from Yemen into officially pro-western Saudi Arabia, passed two security checks, and blown himself up only yards from Prince Mohammad bin Nayef, the Saudi ‘counter-terrorism chief.’

**** American Thinker provided a full account of how PeeCee had (as with the Fort Hood psychiatrist) allowed Mutallab to slip through the security net, especially mentioning that UCL was “a known center for Islamist recruitment” (29 xii). One correspondent summed up the views of others: "We had better wake up and profile or be dead.”


Relief was brought to the Christian world as Muslims turned on each other in the streets of both Iran and Pakistan (e.g. Khaleej Times, 29 xii), giving America and/or Israel a final rationale for destroying these mad-Muesli countries’ nuclear bomb-making facilities. In further Muslim mayhem, 30+ were killed by suicide bombers in the streets of Ramadi, in the west of US-‘pacified’ Iraq; and a judge and his wife were blown sky-high in Kirkuk, in the north (Voice of America, 30 xii).


As US President Obarmy realized he was being accused of the lax, peecee-dominated security that had almost allowed disaster at Detroit, he moved swiftly to pin the blame for not following leads about Bongo-Bongo Mutallab, UCL’s president of its Islamic Society (which had openly run anti-Western propaganda on its website), on police, CIA, airport staff etc. – who thus learned their lesson for years of time-serving jobsworthy co-operation with the diktats of PeeCee.

In Britain, too, the small fry who had gone along with PeeCee for money, seemed likely to get it in the neck. Anthony Glees, professor of security and intelligence studies at the University of Buckingham, said UCL had no excuse for failing to root out extremism on campus (Daily Telegraph, 30 xii). Douglas Murray, of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “UCL has not just failed to prevent students being radicalised, they have been complicit. If any other society at UCL invited someone to speak who encouraged killing homosexuals, that society would be banned immediately, but academics are afraid of taking action when it involves Islamic societies in case they are accused of Islamophobia.”

Among the other terrorists who had graduated from Britaon’s money-grubbing ‘liberal’-left ‘universities’ were former London School of Economics student Omar Sheikh, who beheaded the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002, and former Kings College London students Asif Hanif and Omar Khan Sharif, who carried out a suicide bomb attack on a bar in Tel Aviv in 2003. Abdullah Ahmed Ali, the leader of the 2006 liquid bomb plot to blow up transatlantic airliners, was a graduate of City University in London.

The Telegraph’s Middle East expert, Con Coughlin, wrote (30 xii): “It is easy to imagine that the authorities at UCL took quiet pride in the fact that they had a radical Nigerian Muslim running their Islamic Society. You can’t get more politically correct than that? They would therefore have had little interest in monitoring whether he was using a British university campus as a recruiting ground for al-Qaeda terrorists such as himself. The authorities at UCL should hang their heads in shame – or better than that, perhaps they should resign?”

The idea of blaming the state’s minions for the follies of PeeCee also appealed to Labour’s ‘Justice Minister,’ Jack Straw. Asked why there were so few police on England’s streets, he denied this resulted from the endless form-filling which Labour had imposed on them (so as to ensure Black youths were not inordinately arrested etc.). No, replied Jack, quite a few police just liked sitting in offices for hour filling forms since it kept them out of the cold (BBC, 31 xii).


Times, 31 xii: “[Following the Detroit crotch bomb scare,] 15 scanners at Schiphol airport, where Mr Abdulmutallab boarded his flight, were on trial. The Dutch Government agreed to extend their use, but some aviation experts questioned whether the response was little more than window dressing. “I fear that what we are doing today is to placate the general public rather than have effective security,” Philip Baum, the editor of Aviation Security International, said. “I would say, if we are going to use the technology let’s use the technology that could detect not only what happened on Christmas Day, but what might happen in 2010 or after that.” He said that profiling should be used to determine which passengers should be subjected to specific screening methods.” Israel had used strict profiling of potential terrorists for years, ensuring the safety of its aircraft. By contrast, the US ‘watch list’ contained half a million names, meaning that little effective watching would be done on any of them and that ‘watching’ of White grandmothers etc. would waste time and resources that could have been spent watching young male Arabs, Blacks and Mueslis.

Meanwhile, as Obarmy’s peecee foreign policy collapsed (since his year in office had nothing to reduce Muesli hostility and terror) and the internet was awash with claims that British Intelligence had told the CIA to watch out for a Nigerian flying in with a bomb at Christmas on an American plane, primed from the Yemen by two Mueslis whom Obarmy had released from Guantanamo Bay, the President continued to luxuriate on holiday in Hawaii (patting himself on the back for passing free-ish health care through the Senate, thus completing the process of bankrupting the country which had been begun by President Clinton’s multiculti boom and bust).


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Sunday, December 27, 2009


Not content with having given the vote to propertyless, unemployable welfare-dependents, criminals and lunatics, Britain’s ‘liberal’-lefties continued their scrabble for votes, signing on one immigrant every minute into Britain’s free-gratis-and-for-nothing National Health Service {itself notorious for its filthy mixed-sex-ward hospitals and its routine employment of incomprehensible third-world ‘doctors,’ incompetent yags and power-mad, sociologified lesbian nurses} (Sun, 22 xii).

Adding to the general merriment for the poor and wretched of the earth, Anglican ‘Father’ ‘Tim’ Jones of St Lawrence Church, York, advised any hard-up parishioners to steal from supermarkets – since ‘God’s love for the poor outweighed the property rights of the rich’ (Sun, 22 xii; leader – Nickers, Vicar!).


As the “castrated serfs” of the multiculti West took their Christmas dinners (in much candlelight at Sth Clerk St. Mansions, thanks to the incompetence of British electricians), they were startled to learn that a “Swiss-Italian” woman had felled the Pope in St Peter’s Basilica and that a “British” man had tried to blow up a plane flying from Amsterdam to Detroit.

However, the peecee evasions of the West’s mainstream media (MSM) were soon exposed as it turned out that the Pope’s assailant was surnamed Maiolo (not the most Swiss of names but the journos could not bring themselves to say whether she was Black or White*) and that the Detroit self-exploder was helpfully called Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab and was of Nigerian origin.

(Mutallab, a son of a top Nigerian banker,** had been admitted in 2005 to study engineering at University College London – host to the bizarre professor Eric Barendt, the ‘expert on academic freedom’ who accepted uncomplainingly that there could be no free speech for academics who had lost the endorsement of ‘liberal’-left colleagues [i.e. cultural-Marxist postmodernist fellow-travellers].)

* In fact she was White, but with a history of mental derangement and attacking the Pope that should have been perfectly well known to the authorities and journos.

** The father had actually reported his son to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria because of the child’s extreme anti-Americanism. But the West’s authorities and MSM managed to keep Mutallab’s propensities a secret while he relocated to Egypt, trained with Islamists in the Yemen, and boarded the Detroit-bound plane on which his faulty ‘leg bomb’ was mercifully extinguished by an alert fellow passenger, a Dutch film producer.


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Monday, December 21, 2009


(May be slow to come up. Try hitting Refresh on your browser if it does not)

Sunday, December 20, 2009


Italian soccer crowds continued to embarrass the great-and-good by throwing bananas at Black-as-the-ace-of-spades footballer Mario Balotelli – even though his birth (to Ghanaian parents) in Sicily had qualified him for Italian citizenship (Guardian, 13 xii).


Your family beats up a burglar who has terrorized them. Two family members go down for 30 months each. The burglar (with 54 previous convictions) walks free. Yes, this is what happened as British ‘justice’ considered a Muesli-on-Muesli case (Sun, 15 xii; Guardian, 15 xii). No wonder Mueslis wanted Sharia law!


‘Black roll ooops role model’ and ‘embodiment of the American Dream’ Tiger Woods (see previous) found yet more gorgeous White gals (esp. delectable beauty Cori Rist -- above) coming (sometimes tearfully) out of the cupboard to explain how they had cheated on Tiger’s wife and each other – while the wife, nifty Swedish Elin, prophesied by lawyers to get $100M out of billionaire ‘family man’ Tiger for his naughtiness, appeared in public without her engagement or wedding rings (Sun, 15 xii) and accompanied by removal vans.


As half-bearded Albanian Krenar Lusha, 30, was jailed for seven years at Preston Crown Court for bomb-making, it transpired that his bomb factory had been funded by a 100% mortgage from ‘bank’ NatWest – though the ‘bank’ claimed to make “robust checks” on applicants for its cash (Sun, 16 xii).


Two Black (or at least half-Black) girls bullied another Black girl, a vicar’s daughter, to hurl herself to her death from a third-floor window (over an argument about a boy) (Sun, 15 xii).


Young Muslims of Paris were told to talk properly and wear their baseball caps the right way round by Government minister Nadine Morano – sparking predictable ‘outrage’ (Reuters, 15 xii).

{Whether Nadine new that France’s north-African youf routinely sang songs rejoicing in the raping and killing of White women was unknown. An amused Huguenot pointed out that the French had once (1592) expelled their high-quality Huguenots but could not bring themselves to expel even the most welfare-dependent Mueslis.}


Jews cannot decide who is a Jew – so said Britain’s loopy anti-ethnic new Labour-created ‘Supreme Court,’ ruling that oversubscribed Jewish schools could not discriminate in favour of kids whose mothers were Jewish by birth (rather than by conversion) (Guardian, 16 xii). (British ‘law’ had also made it impossible for Israel’s former foreign minister, blonde Tzipi Livni, to visit London – lest she be detained for ‘war crimes.’ – Even Labour goonboy ‘Foreign Secretary’ David Milliliter admitted the laws of his 12-year-too-long peecee Government might need to be ‘reviewed’(Guardian, 15 xii).)


A ringing denunciation of the multicultural, “totalitarian,” “Marxist” West and its “hate crimes” (used to charge Whites, but never ethnic minorities) was provided in Pravda (10 xii) by plainly assiduous West-watcher Stanislav Mishin (apparently a loyal Orthodox Christian, elitist, Russian patriot, columnist and blogger) – eliciting whoops of approval from AmRen readers (17 xii).


Even the blizzards caused by ‘global warming’…. could not prevent the happy arrival in Edinburgh (from his Lincolnshire home) of the genial Johnsonian figure of the BNP’s ‘The Doc’ – from time to time in demand as the party’s highly successful Press Officer. So how was the day passed? Well, not much on the AfPak War (which the BNP rather opposes but which the West may just actually, at last, be winning – National Post, 19 xii)!

No, as befitted revellers in a city of culture (supplied for Christmas by its Council with a Big Wheel and Helter-Skelter, though not, of course, with Mother Mary, Santa, Snowman or Crib) we sank some Guinness at the favourite pub of journalists, intellectuals and lesbians, The Doric, then gravitated to the National Gallery of Scotland to admire Titian, Ruisdael, Cuyp, Vermeer and Belotto and of course the newly recaptured (from thieves) ‘Madonna of the Yarnwinder’ in which the Christ-child foresees His own future in the cross made by his mama’s yarnwinder (triggering in us reflections on martyrdom that were much alleviated by substantial consumption of delicious Merlot together with Scotch beef, sea bass and venison in the Gallery’s congenial restaurant (allowing a view of Avercampian ice-skating and of nubile nymphettes zooming up and down from trampolines).



Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Monday, December 14, 2009


As 500 English Defence League supporters demonstrated noisily in central Nottingham against Pakistan-flag-waving Unite Against Fascism crazies, they were not joined by the BNP, UKIP or the Conservatives; nor would they confess racism or even race realism, saying they were only opposing Islamic extremism (Guardian, 5 xii).)


After half a century of behaviourists and communist sidekicks desperately arguing for the centrality of ‘training’ to performance (e.g. the late M.J.A. Who of Exeter University), the English football team was on the verge of deciding that it was *Viagra* that was crucial – expanding lung capacity and inducing the desired match-winning tendencies (News of the World, 6 xii, ‘The World Cup’s got harder’).


As Black (well, “Cablinasian” [Caucasian/Black/{Red}Indian/Asian] one-quarter-White) golfer Tiger Woods (up with the Pope and BinLiner as one of the world’s best known people and specially chosen by Blacks as a ‘role model’) struggled to maintain the ‘privacy’ which he had always sought as a wondrous, clean-living, family man (see previous), a fifth busty waitress came forward to say he was a sex-mad wildman who loved nothing better than spanking her and pulling her hair (News of the World, 6 xii). ‘Mindy’ said: “"He had such a big sex drive and wanted it fulfilled. I guess I was giving him what his wife wasn't. Tiger is so used to getting his way. What Tiger wants, Tiger gets. I want his wife to know what a cheat he has been. He does not care for her otherwise he would not be having sex with me and these other women. I am so glad that I am no longer involved with him. He is just another cheating husband who has been caught out." The Times reckoned no less than six birdies had been in play (6 xii) – mainly dating from Woods’ wife’s pregnancy in 2006.

By 8 xii, at least eight (White, Barbie-lookalike) playmates were claimed (Daily Mail – with visual aids, including of a busty porn star), together with a possible ninth, a British TV presentress. Tiger was said to have been rushed to hospital after his ‘car accident,’ having taken the (prescription) drugs Vicodin and Ambien (the last, a sedative, having been used to fuel his sex life according to some girls). Tiger’s wife, Elin Nordegren, had apparently left home and bought a property together with her sister on a small island near Stockholm.

By 11 xii (Sun), Tiger, embarrassed as a tenth White birdie came forward and a love-child was rumoured, seemed to be deciding on a holiday from golf and on a lengthy world cruise on his private yacht (called ‘Privacy’) together with his shapely wife Elin. TV advertising featuring Tiger had ceased since 29 xi (Guardian, 10 xii).

By 12 xii (Sun) a high-class brothel madam ooops directress of an escort agency stepped forward to claim she had supplied Tiger with up to fifteen girls at a time (over one weekend -- he loved to see and join in girl-on-girl action) including stunning Playboy model Loredana Jolie.


After five years of persecution, with his University of Aarhus colleagues slurring him as a possible KKK member and, of course, paedophile, robust Professor Helmuth Nyborg, 70, sporting a 30-yr-younger wife, fought back in Jyllandposten (7 xii), against charges of right-wing naughtiness – arising merely because he had repeated the 40-year-known fact that males have a wider standard deviation in IQ (and thus produce more geniuses – and more mental defectives). Helmuth rightly concluded of his boss: “The Rector has endangered the right of a scientist to freely and, without risk of punishment, select a method and a research topic. The Rector told a newspaper: “My primary duty is to care for the good reputation of the university, but I will also go far to defend freedom of research as expression”. Precisely this order of priorities kills free research and freedom of expression, and should never stand unchallenged.” {I had written to Aarhus to support Helmuth 7 xii 2005 – see previous; but evidently to no avail.}


Loopy Poole Council, Dorset, were forced to provide a proper Christmas Tree in their town centre after protests against a peecee conical ‘tree’ which they had supplied with no red and green colours, crib or fairy – it had soon been vandalized by irate townsfolk (Sun, 9 xii).


Shunning the paedohysteria of the tabloid Anglo-Saxons (who wildly thought to spare their young from paedophilia while exposing them recklessly to socialism, egalitarianism, miseducation, incomprehensible bureaucracy, third-world immigration, Muesli terror, girl drunkenness, filthy hospitals and increasingly agrammatical BBC broadcasters), Athens mounted a display of the charms of the ancient world (including discussion, bravery, philosophy, beauty, athleticism and passable democracy). The Guardian reported (9 xii):

….in three rooms reserved for artistic renditions of sexual congress, pederasty (socially accepted in ancient times), homoerotic love, and the quaintly named "bucolic love affair", viewers are bombarded with what the ancients were clearly good at: being bawdy. From scenes of anal copulation to mutual oral sex, to lucky charms of giant phalluses and engravings of frenzied sex with the half-man, half beast satyrs and silens, Eros is depicted in all its glory.

"I delight in the prime of a boy at 12," one scribe declares in a text highlighted on a wall. "One of 13 is much more desirable. He who is 14 is a still sweeter flower of the lovers. And one who is just beginning his 15th year is yet more delightful. The 16th year is that of the gods. And as for the 17th, it is not for me but for Zeus to seek it."

Aristophanes, the 5th century BC comic, who embraced the obscene, devising 106 ways of describing the male genitals and 91 those of the female, would not have been disappointed.


As the good-looking (and braided through her trial, to resemble a 17th-century Puritan or modern Mormon woman) Italy-convicted murderess Amanda Knox, 21, was loyally defended by much of the American press, the Daily News Tribune [Massachusetts] provided (9 xii) the most comprehensible and sympathetic account of her conviction – understandable personologically in view of Amanda being a promiscuous, Black-mixing druggie who had plainly contradicted herself (i.e. lied) as well as performing cartwheels at the police station and smooching publicly with her boyfriend (a nice boy who soon dumped her) in the aftermath of her flatmate’s (Meredith’s) half-clothed body being discovered (after prolonged attempts to scrub away evidence of what had happened at the crime scene). A psychological analysis of America’s reluctance to accept the guilt of the (pretty but narcissistic/histrionic/hysterical – the victim of one of the West’s countless broken families) girl next door was offered in The First Post (11 xii). Italian newspapers and British liberals pointed out that Amanda was much luckier as a convicted murderess to be facing life in Italy rather than death row in America (Guardian, 11 xii).


Less than half of South Africans believed that race relations in the country had improved since the end of apartheid, a nationwide survey found (Guardian, 10 xii). On a typical day, the survey discovered, one in four people never spoke to others of different races, and two in five generally found other races "untrustworthy". The report suggested there was waning confidence in the ideal of the "rainbow nation". The belief that relations between racial groups had been improving had declined in recent years, the study showed, saying that social and geographic divisions persisted, fifteen years after the end of white minority rule. In 2006, 61% of South Africans had agreed that "the relationship between the various races" was improving; but this had fallen to 49% by 2009. Confidence in a "happy future for all races", which peaked at 86% in 2005, had fallen to 62%. The findings of 2009's South African Reconciliation Barometer Survey were a blow to a country seeking to present an image of harmonious multiculturalism as it prepared to host the 2010 World [footie] Cup.


As the Spectator’s Rod Liddle attributed “the overwhelming majority” of violent crime in London to “young men from the Afro-Caribbean community”, he promptly met criticism from Black lefties Diane Abbott (‘overwhelming’ was an exaggeration), Bonnie Greer (most paedophilia is White) and scores of others (New Statesman, 8 xii); but Speccie editor Fraser Nelson robustly said his writers were free to give offence and, in the Times (10 xii), Antonia Senior rehearsed the London crime figures (e.g. 58% of robberies were by Blacks) and deplored the shooting of messengers – on both counts carrying almost all her correspondents with her. Thus the affair blew over – and Antonia even mentioned the possible involvement of genetic factors and the fact that men range more widely than women in intelligence (“the more dumb-bells, more Nobels effect”). {A welcome breakthrough for sanity, though neither Rod, Fraser or Antonia saw fit to mention the London School’s forty years of work on such topics.}


As a BBC 1 ‘Question Time’ panel (10 xii, including a bloated, crop-haired Labour Government goon minister, ‘Opposition’ spokesman William Hague and LibDim St Paddy Ashdown) could not between them explain why Britain and America were fighting ooops social-working in Afghanistan, being incapable of mentioning such concepts as Muesli terror and Shariah law, let alone Muslims or Mahomet, it was revealed that America’s great ally, Pakistan, the beneficiary of many billions of dollars of US largesse, was pursuing a “twin-track policy” of supporting the Taliban beardies in Afghanistan (in the hope they would repel Indian influence) while letting the Americans fly the occasional drone in the direction of Taliban positions in Pakistan itself (RediffNews, 11 xii).

Just as the West had got no grip on its home-grown Muesli traitors, it evidently had no coherent policy for exterminating loonies from the badlands of the Stans. No wonder the Wootton Bassett QT audience (familiar with coffins coming back from Helmand Province) gave by far the most applause to a pretty Muslimme (in George Galloway’s ‘Respect’ party) who urged that no more British lives be wasted in Afghanistan (which had already claimed 238 dead British soldiers and thousands of grievously physically and mentally injured).

Journaliste Robin Wright noted for the Washington Post (11 xii): “Failure by the world's mightiest military power, backed by the largest military alliance, to uproot the Taliban -- a force without an air force, armored corps, long-range artillery, satellite intelligence or powerful foreign backer -- would vividly illustrate the limits of U.S. power. The consequences could dwarf those of the defeat in Vietnam, even if the loss of life was smaller.” And that failure would have resulted not from lack of co-operation from Russia, China and India but simply from an unwillingness to address and reverse Muslim colonisation of the cowardly West.


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Sunday, December 06, 2009


Four years after the peak of car-burning (voitures flambées) by North African youth on the outskirts of French cities (‘sensitive urban zones’ – ZUS), and after the subsequent promises (esp. by President Sarkozy) of “Marshall Aid” for these areas, a government report found the socio-economic gap between the ZUS the rest of France had actually widened – and unemployment among young males had actually increased (to 42%) (American Renaissance, 1 xii). One AmRen correspondent who had been in Paris for Christmas, 2008, wrote: “The situation is approaching a dénouement. France is walking on thin ice, all the while in official denial; but eventually one of these riots that don’t officially exist is going to get out of control. Then all of Europe could be aflame.”


Libya (with which Britain had become pally despite its murderous ways [Lockerbie]) became the first Muslim country to take revenge on Switzerland for voting to outlaw minarets (see previous): it promptly sentenced two Swiss businessmen to sixteen months in jail for minor violations of visa regulations and labour laws – the two had originally been arrested in June in revenge for ‘Colonel’ Gaddafi’s son (lately seen dining and shooting in the English countryside along with yag ‘Deputy’ Prime Minister Lord Mandy Mandelbrot) and wife being arrested in a Geneva hotel for beating up their servants (ABC News, 1 xii).

The Jerusalem Post (1 xii) presented a robust defence of the decision of Swiss voters, particularly observing that thousands of mosques in the Middle East did without minarets which, never mandated in the Koran, only became specially treasured by Mueslis in Christian areas wanting to symbolize the superiority of Islam. The Spectator’s Rod Liddle was also strikingly robust, reckoning that some 60-65% of people in Europe resented the immigration foisted on them by their politicians (3 xii).

In France, a survey showed that the National Front’s ideas about Muslims and immigration were accepted by up to 73 per cent of voters, provided they didn’t know the ideas come from the FN: the same idea in the mouth of FN parliamentarian Marie Le Pen was approved by only 20 per cent of voters, but when attributed to other politicians it reached up to 73 per cent support (Turkish Weekly, 4 xii).

Adding fuel to the flames, Switzerland’s Christian Democratic People’s Party said there should not be separate cemeteries for Muslims, Jews and Christians (European Jewish Press, 4 xii) – thus stipulating integration in death even if Ms and Js made it impossible in life.


Italy’s small town of Coccaglio, east of Milan and led by the Northern League, announced it would spend the next two months checking identity papers and handing over all illegal immigrants to the authorities (American Renaissance, 2 xii).


As Conservative leader Daft Dave Cameron languished in the polls and Labour’s Pa Broon prepared to use the SAS to bring in the head of O.K. BinLiner as an election-winning breakthrough, even the usually above-it-all Spectator (1 xii) suggested desperately that the Tories would have to back FAMILY -- though the magazine did not couple this with backing FREEDOM, without which (e.g. the freedom to choose schools, speak frank opinions or [non-injuriously] slap children) most families were just castrate organs of the state. FAMILY, FREEDOM, FELLOWSHIP (everyone a member of a voluntary group) and FUN (hi tech for all) needed to be the policies for 21st-century Tories; but Tories had not listened to The g Factor Newsletter or the McDougall Newsletter, so were likely to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the 2010 General Election (due by June).


Having elected a nig-nog President with a Muslim father, a Marxoid mother and a long track record of largessing underdogs, Americans awoke to find – surprise! – that Washington (after three months of committee meetings decreed by Saint Barry Hussein Obarmy) had no plan at all to defend against Muesli terror and would abandon Afghanistan in 2011 – behind a smokescreen of pretended semi-surges, training of the Afghan army, rebuilding multiply bombed-out schools for Muslim girls etc. (Guardian, Simon Jenkins, 2 xii). Europe’s future was once more largely in the hands of Russia – as it had been in 1941.


As America began its retreat from AfPak (see previous) the normally non-racist New York Times allowed its columnists to consider whether the world of the future belonged to the Chinese (2 xii, ‘Western men are doomed’) – though not to consider whether genetic factors might be involved in Chinese high IQ and hyperconformity.


Supposedly squeaky-clean ‘gentleman’ Black footballer Thierry Henry, who had handballed France to a victory over Éire in the ‘World Cup’ (see 19 xi), was joined in the doghouse by Black (well, half-Black) superstar golfer Tiger Woods (the goody-goody face of the superfirms Nike and Gillette) who apologized for his “transgressions” after crashing his car, apparently because of an argument with his wife over his serial adultery with at least one cocktail waitress – though admittedly the tabloid-alleged girlfriends (all of them White) looked delectaby endowed (esp. in the legs department – D.Torygraph, 5 xii). {To add to ‘clean-cut’ Tiger’s embarrassment, one girlfriend rated his bedtime performance as “horrible” (Sun, 4 xii). The golfer who had introduced Tiger to his busty-blonde wife-to-be Elin said: "I have lost all respect for Tiger, especially as a father. It doesn't matter what he has done out there on the golf course."}

By 5 xii, a fourth White girl, a cute blonde model, was coming forward to claim a medal for her own slice of the action with Tiger (Hollywood Gossip). And a busty brunette White bank marketing manageress came to Tiger’s defence, saying he was “amazing” in the sack and had told her he would pack in his loveless and sexless marriage and go off with her if it were not for his children (World News, 5 xii).

African-American cheating also hit the front page of the usually peecee Wall Street Journal (4 xii) as a fraud trial of soldiers concluded with lengthy jail terms. “Reams of court documents from overlapping cases revealed a pattern of corruption [in connection with the Iraq war/occupation]. Army contracting officers, almost all of them African Americans, reached out to African-American businessmen, seeking bribes in exchange for contracting deals.” {Loved the ‘reaching out’!...}


Testifying to new enthusiasm for raciology in Moscow, the important work The Origin of the Aryans by philologist Canon Isaac Taylor (1829-1901) appeared in a Russian translation published by Beye Press. (The original 1890 book could be previewed and Taylor had an entry in the Columbia Encyclopaedia.) Taylor had argued (against Max Müller) that the Indo-European peoples originated in European Russia rather than central Asia – a view cited sympathetically in 1988 by Joseph Deniker in his The Races of Man. Taylor also provoked controversy by agreeing with the explorer Richard Burton that the disciplines of Islam made that religion more helpful than Christianity for Africa – see discussion. – William McDougall agreed with Taylor about Islam by 1904. Taylor especially maintained there was a clear connection between race and religion, with no European nation being “Mahommedan” except for Persia where the Shiah sect had “transformed the innermost tenets of Islam” in the direction of mysticism. {For better or worse, however one notable achievement of Islam in Africa, along with the suppression of superstition, was the suppression of infanticide. However, in allowing regulated polygamy, Islam was surely eugenic for the continent -- the Hausa people of Nigeria being a notably admirable product, respected by the British military.}


The nonsense of NuLabour’s immigration ‘policy’ was hilariously exposed as the be-turbaned, middle-aged son of a top Afghan politician, the son a regular beneficiary in his home country of personal round-the-clock protection by the British Army, sought asylum in Liverpool – where he could apparently claim accommodation, family health and education, ‘human rights,’ child benefit and a personal £35 per week (Sun, 4 xii).


Apparently a reader of this diary/blog…., Prime Minister Bean ooops Broon became the first Western politician to criticize Pakistan’s eight-year lack of effort in hunting down O.K. BinLiner and his merry men – by 2009 dispersed from the Afpak border across the entire Punjab and probably into other Stans. Pa Broon’s diplomatic Chinese whisper was: “I hope Pakistan will join us against al-Qaeda” – with the clear implication that (suicidally divided) Pakiland had not previously done any ‘joining.’

{The longstanding convention of the West’s basket-case politicos and MSM had been to leave any criticism of Pakiland to this diary/blog for fear of upsetting the West’s immigrant Pakis and their illiterate Pak wives and even more ignorant children. But apparently Pa Broon’s patience ran out after three months of Pres. Obarmy – faced with his top general’s demand for 40,000 more troops to build schools’n’ospitals and stamp out yet more poppy growing in Afghaniland…. -- failing to decide what on earth he should decide on as American policy.}


Defying most of their pathetic peecee politicians, 58% of Swiss people – surely speaking for Europe – said in a referendum they objected to minarets (triumphalist Muesli phallic symbols, housing muezzins calling Mueslis to prayer*) (EuroNews, 29 xi; RiaNovosti, 29 xi; Guardian, 29 xi; VDare, 29 xi), thereby mandating that no more than the existing four would be built in Switzerland. Right-wing Swiss People’s Party leader, Walter Wobmann, told Reuters: "People may practise their religion, that is no problem," while adding that his group just wanted to stop "political Islam" from gaining ground in Switzerland.

Just two weeks prior to the referendum, only 34% had been prepared to tell doorstep pollsters that they wanted minarets banned. The number of Muslims in Switzerland had reached 400,000 – 6% of the population (up from 1% in 1980); and though very few of them wore traditional Muesli dress or made a nuisance of themselves, the Swiss had plainly seized the opportunity to tell their politicians that enough was enough. In 2005, the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyib Erdogan, a crypto-Islamist, had been unwise enough to issue a blanket defiance to Western countries: “Mosques are our barracks, domes our helmets, minarets our bayonets.” Swiss feminists had been prominent in opposing minarets – the first official feminists in Europe to appreciate what most people had seen for a generation, that Islamism posed something of a threat to Western women’s rights and privileges.

During the campaign, vandals had damaged Geneva’s main mosque by throwing stones and a pot of paint; on another occasion, a van pulled up outside the mosque early in the morning, loudly blaring a recording of the call to prayers through loudspeakers. Both the Protestant and Catholic churches had rallied to the defence of minaret building, along with most political parties, human rights experts and a number of cabinet ministers (notably France’s Bernard Kouchner – Spero, 30 xi). For the Guardian, Tariq Ramadan (Professor of Contemporary Islamic Studies at Oxford University….), blamed the referendum result on insufficient militancy on the part of Swiss Muslims….

{The result boded well for Lord Pearson of Rannoch’s idea [following my own advocacy from 1994] that referenda should become a standard instrument of legislation in Britain. Telegraph blogger Gerald Warner and correspondents hailed the result as the beginning of a Europe-wide ‘peasant’s revolt’ that would sweep away PeeCee by 2015 (29 xi).}

Restrictions on church building in Muslim countries were summarized by the Christian Science Monitor (30 xi): in Saudi there were no churches at all, no religion other than Islam could be practised outside the home and Jews in injury cases received only 50% of the compensation levels applying to Muslims.

By contrast with the willingness of ordinary Europeans to be rid of minarets, the attitude of the West’s wretched multicultified ‘authorities’ was shown in hypersensitive reluctance to offend Mueslis:

Incredibly, it was official police policy in Britain to alert “Muslim community leaders” before raids on premises in the search for explosives and terrorists. Police even put little bootees on explosive-sniffing dogs so as “not to offend” suspected terrorists.

* Though not in well-regulated Switzerland, where such noisy and garish practices were forbidden.


A new Tory think-tank, ‘ResPublica,’ announced itself in London, headed by the intellectual Philip Blond and advocating that social problems be solved by civil society rather than by the state – recalling my own proposal in a Prison Psychological Service paper of 1966 that minor criminals (alcoholics were the special focus) should be spared prison if they registered and stayed in touch with a church, club or college that would be given 25% of their putative jail costs for keeping an eye on them and a further 25% if the criminals stayed out of trouble for a stipulated period.


Dismayed over the 58% of Swiss voters who had opposed Islamic phallic symbols (see previous), the Guardian’s Joan Smith quickly reached the conclusion that the result showed “the idiocy of referendums” (30 xi). But, not content with such apostatic abandonment of the left’s supposed commitment to democratic ideas, Joan went on to explain that many feminists and secularists would have felt obliged to vote against minarets – little appreciating that this admission undermined at a stroke the Left-Muslim coalition that loopies had been trying to orchestrate ever since the 1989 collapse of communism deprived the left of any useful role in public affairs.


As Baroness Warsi, Britain’s most powerful Muslim woman and the Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion, visited multiculti Luton, she was pelted with eggs (one breaking in her hair) by youthful Mueslis of the banned extremist group Al-Muhajiroun and told she was not a proper Muslim because she did not favour Sharia law (Daily Mail, 30 xi). No arrests were made, apparently because it was deemed as impolitic to arrest Mueslis for assault as to deport them for benefit dependency or try them for treason. In return, Baroness Fartsy linked her attackers to another loopy group that Britain had failed to get rid of, Islam4UK, and said such people were not proper Muslims (Sun, 2 xii).


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Sunday, November 29, 2009


Evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller (U. New Mexico) predicted that coming changes in geneticists’ methods, due in 2010, would reveal race, class and sex differences as never before – to the horror of PeeCee. He wrote in the Economist (13 xi): “Human geneticists have reached a private crisis of conscience, and it will become public knowledge in 2010. The crisis has depressing health implications and alarming political ones. In a nutshell: the new genetics will reveal much less than hoped about how to cure disease, and much more than feared about human evolution and inequality, including genetic differences between classes, ethnicities and races.”


As US policy in the War on Terror was stymied by the great US ‘ally’ of fifty years, Pakistan, with the sixth largest army in the world, failing to agree how to proceed, the Washington Times reported that one-eyed Mullah Omar, the leader of the Afghan Taliban, has been shifted with the help of Pakistan’s key military body, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), from Quetta to Karachi for fear of American drone attacks targeting him in Balochistan’s capital.

American intelligence sources also began to leak that the ISI was implicated in the Bombay terror attacks of 26/11/2008 which had killed 173 (Hindustan Times, 22 xi). Pakistani nationalists accused America of ‘betraying’ Pak by cosying up to India (Kashmir Watch, 22 xi). The Indian press reported (, 23 xi): “Pakistan continues to remain obsessed with a threat from India rather than concentrating on getting rid of Islamic terrorism within its territory, US officials say.” And who paid for the Taliban’s weaponry? Answer: the Americans themselves, as the cost of getting food and medical supplies through the Khyber Pass!


New German scholarship provided a mountain of evidence that the plays of ‘Shakespeare’ were written not by an uneducated country bumpkin, as lovingly assumed by the English of their national hero, but (as long envisaged in TgF NewsLetters) by the 17th Earl of Oxford -- who had been nicknamed at Queen Eliizabeth I’s court as ‘Spear-shaker’ (Daily Telegraph, 23 xi).


A new summary, update and discussion of problems for the London School was provided by Jelte M. Wicherts*, Denny Borsboom, Conor V. Dolan [U. Amsterdam]:

'Review: Why national IQs do not support evolutionary theories of intelligence’ Personality and Individual Differences 48 (2010) 91-106.

[with three replies by J. Philippe Rushton, Richard Lynn and Donald I. Templer, followed by a rebuttal by the authors].

Though familiar problems persisted (skull size being a weak correlate of g, Egypt and Mesopatamia having once had high cultural attainment, Japan stagnant since 1995 and Iceland going broke in 2008), doubters were left with Richard Lynn’s key challenge (from his The Global Bell Curve, Washington Summit, 2008) to find a single multiracial society in which IQ and correlated lifestyle variables did not run along the lines of East Asian > White >>> Black.


As the Conservatives fell to 37% support in the polls (Labour 31%), their leader, Daft Dave Cameron, trotted out the (quite correct but previously unmentioned-by-him) fact that there were Muesli schools in Britain which received state funding while having heads who had been (or were married to) members of the extreme Muesli outfit ‘Hizb ut-Tahrir’ [aka HeadButYo’Rear] (which said it was lawful take the blood of Westerners, especially Jews) – eliciting squeals from Labour that the funding involved came not them them but from Local Authorities (as in fact mandated by Labour for any schools providing free nursery places….) (Times, 26 xi; Daily Telegraph, 26 xi).

Then it turned out that, all unknown to Britain’s head-in-the-sand peecee political class, the Muesli schools in question had been ‘inspected’ and cleared of extremism by a government apparat (‘OFSTED’) headed by a Muslim woman who had officiated at events run by a Muesli outfit headed by a man wanted for terrorism by Interpol (Daily Telegraph, 27 xi). Further, BBC Newsnight discovered that the official written curriculum at one of the partly-state-funded schools insisted that children be taught to reject ‘the corruption of Western democracy’ and plays like ‘Romeo and Juliet’ which sanctioned disobedience to parents (27 xi).


In a bizarre Spectator article (25 xi), contributing editor Dennis Sewell argued that Britain’s welfare state originated not least from the thinking of eugenicists, who often doubled as socialists, liberals, progressives etc. in their concern to eradicate squalour, crime and misery. Sewell’s unusual generosity to eugenicists was accompanied by high-falutin’ Spectatorly regret that the utopian welfare state had done too little to encourage ‘responsibility’; but it was unfair to blame eugenics for this, since eugenicists, as Sewell himself admitted, had wanted family allowances graduated to provided more help to middle class parents and had wanted the unemployable to be denied rights to voting and fatherhood.

Socialist irresponsibility certainly characterized the post-1945 period of Labour governments (culminating eventually in the withdrawal of double-voting by Oxbridge dons and of extra family allowances for all academics); it had not been a characteristic of the pre-1939 discussions of Francis Galton, William McDougall, H.G. Wells, Bernard Shaw, the Fabian Sydney and Beatrice Webb, Leonard Darwin, birth-controller Marie Stopes and ‘Father-of-the-welfare-state’ William Beveridge.


Lord Pearson of Rannoch, 67, the keen Thatcherite and friend of Solzhenitsyn (and one-time colleague of mine on the Council for National Academic Awards) who had managed to bring banned Islamosceptic Geert Wilders to London in the teeth of opposition from the peecee Home Office, was elected leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party – freeing the previous leader, Nigel Farage, to devote himself to seeking election as MP for Buckingham (BBC, 27 xi; D.Tel.’s Ed West, 27 xi).

A (largely self-made) millionaire Etonian who had done much to help groups in Eastern Europe fighting to escape communism, Lord Pearson was likely to shift UKIP against low-quality immigration in general and Muesli extremism in particular – topics which Mr Farage had always feared might ‘backfire.’

Thus the basis for an electoral pact with the equally anti-EU BNP seemed clear. The parties could usefully coalesce around Lord Pearson’s enthusiasm for referenda – a proposal which could easily lead to the ending of third-world immigration, restoration of selection of pupils by schools, restoration of hanging, recruitment of the state-dependent unemployable into task forces [e.g. for Africa] and the ending of political control of the economy, and which would itself be electorally preferred in view of the 2009 shambles of the House of Commons [which could not even solve its own scandals over expenses].

Perhaps even 50% of LibDims could be tempted by offers of total free speech, proportional representation and a job for their guru Vince Cable as President of an all-powerful Bank of England?.... Electoral pacts beckoned. (Profile of ‘P of R’ (who, like BNP leader Nick Griffin, continued to deny ‘racism’ and didn’t often mention ‘race realism’): Times, 28 xi.

Sadly, given an opportunity to score on BBC R5 (28 xi), Pearson failed even to run with the ball, contenting himself with exposing Daft Dave’s treachery over his “cast iron” guarantee to hold a referendum on the EU’s Lisbon Treaty. Even his possibly hugely popular proposal of referenda hardly got a mention. A mentally fortifying encounter with race realists and freedom fighters looked urgently necessary.)


The European Union Parliament which had two BNP members (while the Westminster Parliament had none) further demonstrated the fairness of its arrangements by hilariously sending Nick Griffin (who opposed both Green fascism and the EU itself) to Copenhagen as one of its fifteen representatives to discuss ‘climate change’ (if any) with the likes of St Barry Obarmy and Grumpy Gordon [himself much preoccupied with sparing homosexuals from the lash in Uganda] (Observer, 29 xi).

{The Spectator was reminded of Auberon Waugh’s reflection that he would rather the world be ‘better run by Belgian ticket-collectors’ (of which the newly selected EuroPres Rumpy-Pumpy [pron. Rum-pow] seemed a first-class example) than by power-mad politicians (who had by 2009 brought Britain’s economy, armed forces, schools, hospitals, prisons and constitution to downfall). As Daft Dave sank in the polls, a cheering thought was that traditional right-wing ideas of freedom and law would at least get a growing hearing in Brussels, even though they had none at first-past-the-post Westminster and its allied peecee media class.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Sunday, November 22, 2009


In a major breakthrough for a British National Party policy, the recession-hit Holy Republic of Ireland announced a scheme of voluntary repatriation under which non-EU residents would be given (between them) £.5M in 2009-10 to encourage them to relocate to their tribal homelands (often in Brazil, China and west Africa) (Observer, 15 xi). Éire’s proportion of residents being non-national had shot up to 20% since 1990, when the figure had been a mere 5%).


Harvard’s Stephen Pinker, the self-made star popularizer of London School ideas (though race-avoidant), provided a fine defenestration of anti-IQ (quarter-)Black journalist Malcolm Gladwell, pointing out that his quirky examples of ‘achievement by practice’ had little basis in social science and that Gladwell’s reading of factor-analytic literature was so non-existent that he wrote of ‘igon values’ instead of ‘eigenvalues’ (New York Times, 15 xi). (Pinker subsequently wrote in to NYT defend his qualified hereditarianism about IQ as “mainstream” (19 xi).)


As Australia’s pathetic PM Kevin Rudd repeatedly said SORRY (see previous) in a long speech in capital city Canberra to hundreds of Australians who had been child labourers ‘in care’ along with the 150K disadvantaged British kids sent down to Oz as children to meet the targets of the country’s White Australia Policy, it turned out that the child-immigrants (who had mainly been enthusiastic to get away from their poor/drunken/violent parents in Britain) had been the victims of an Oz-based misunderstanding.

Not believing in genetic factors, so as to assist psychological denial of their own convict origins, middle-class Australians had become largely environmentalist in philosophy by the mid-twentieth century – e.g. becoming keen on American behaviourism and even inventing their own radical anti-psychological doctrine of ‘Australian materialism.’ Thus they believed that any children could be turned into good Australians – a proposition made easier to accept politically since in those days Britain had no Blacks to export. Thus the Australians chose to ignore that quite a few of the abandoned eight-year-olds made available for export by Britain were poor physical specimens of low IQ and discipline who were already bedwetters long before they ever clapped eyes on the Oz-bound boats (Guardian, 16 xi).

Unsurprisingly, ordinary Australian farmers were pretty shocked by the child labourers inflicted on them by their philosopher-politicians, so many of the kids ended being looked after by the only remaining people interested in them: the paedophiles and (doubtless) occasional paedosadists of Roman Catholic orders such as the notorious Christian Brothers (who specialized in taking on some of the very hardest cases for the Church and felt entitled – in Ireland quite as much as in Australia -- to use naked beatings [supposedly to punish boys for erections seen in the showers but doubtless sometimes providing sexual gratification for some staff]).

Unsurprisingly, in view of modern researches, little conspicuous long-term harm seems to have come to the deportees – indeed, one scoutmaster-paedophiled boy had even gone on to become an Australian Senator, if with a disagreeable tendency to whingeing (Sydney Morning Herald, 16 xi). At least one of the ‘Lost Innocents’ (as the amazingly uninquisitive press dubbed them) told journalists that growing up without her biological relatives had proved strengthening for her; and added there was not much that could have been done to improve on the policies which Australia and Britain had pursued (Yass Tribune, 18 xi).

About a quarter of the children transported from England had actually been born to Irish single-parent mothers who had deemed it politic to flee to Britain from censorious Southern Ireland, hoping that their pregnancies would thus remain unknown to their parents (Irish Times, 18 xi). Guardian correspondents (who might have been expected to welcome disadvantaged children being freed from brutal/bourgeois/imperialist Britain) proved unquestioningly ‘sympathetic’ to the ‘Innocents’ of whose histories they knew nothing – their ‘sympathy’ culminating predictably in “I look forward to the most important government apology: to the people of Palestine who lost their homeland as a result of the Balfour Declaration of 1917” (18 xi). The Roman Catholic Church also went into conventional hysterics about the ‘Innocents’ – while hoping that the “good work” of many staff in its institutions would not be forgotten (Catholic Leader, 22 xi)….

Supreme Leader Brown’s ‘apology’ for the fifty-year policy was especially preposterous in that he had never apologized for selling Britain’s gold when he should have been buying more, for borrowing to fund his pet statist schemes when he should have been saving, and for failing to anticipate the wreck of the British economy or to attribute overlending to the demands of the multicultural vote-buying policies of Presidents Clinton and G.W. Bush. (For more on meaningless apologies – like Rev. Bliar’s for slavery and the Irish potato famine – see Rod Liddle, Spectator, 18 xi.)


After a job creation scheme involving millions of police hours over twenty years trying to find a London rapist and burglar who had attacked some 200 old people, including one woman of 100, an arrest was made of a ‘quiet and decent’ Jamaican-born father of five called Delroy Grant, 55 and married to a Jehovah’s Witness (Sun, 16 xi). Neighbours in south London were amazed to learn what this oh-so-‘nice’ Black man was accused of – these Whites having been just as gullible as most of those in Fort Hood, Tx. (see previous), who had gone along for years with the pleasant-enough ways of (murderous) traitor Maj. Nadal Malik Hasan. A previous wife described ‘Night Stalker’ Grant as a cleanliness-obsessed, violent bully (Sun, 17 xi).

Meantime, aggro flared at England’s tough maximum-security prison, Belmarsh, as Mueslis used boiling water and a jar in a sock to attack a White (who needed hospitalization) (Daily Mirror, 12 xi); and Muesli pundits told BBC 2 Newsnight (host: J. Paxman; 16 xi) what all but the British Government had long ago worked out, that the major centre of worldwide Muesli terror was Pakistan – where, for example, the residents of much-bombed Peshawar were equally divided as between supporting the mad-Muesli Gummint and the mad-Muesli Taliban. (The army of this failed state supported the not-so-mad-Muesli Taliban, hoping these less-bearded wonders might hold the border with increasingly Indian-backed Afghanistan while the army concentrated on its 60-year mission to regain Kashmir….)


After years of pinning ‘racism’ on Sir Francis Galton (explorer of Africa), Adolf Hitler (who notoriously attacked fellow-Whites in Poland, France, Britain and Russia) and the London School, and forgetting that the West’s greatest philosophers, Kant and Hume, and its greatest biologist, Darwin, had been racists, the hysterics of the Left, forever determined to prove they had won WWII against Hitler (whose Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939-41 they had actually fulsomely encouraged), felt desperate enough to attack even The Greatest Briton (BBC, 2002), Sir Winston Churchill (who had backed the Scots, Jews and French and lost Britain’s fortune and Empire in pursuit of upholding British honour against Nazism) (Scottish Left Review, xi): "I thought I had taken too many drugs when I saw Nick Griffin on Question Time and found myself agreeing with him. Not, I hasten to add, on any of his policies or views on immigration. But in his claim that if he were alive today, Churchill would be in the BNP. Hard to argue against that, really. OK, Churchill may have won World War II but he was a nasty racist bigot".


The restiveness of Muesli-dominated northern Africa surfaced as skimpily clad model-turned-singer, Middle East sex symbol Haifa Wehbe (from Lebanon -- see above) came up with a song referring to a “Nubian monkey” – infuriating the darker-skinned southern Egyptians, who protested that their children would not be able to attend school without being called ‘monkeys’ (Guardian, 17 xi).


Revealing the total inadequacy of America and its allies in responding to Al-Qaeda, Bin Liner, 9/11, 7/7 etc., the beardy-weirdies of Wazyurdrinkistan took blindfolded journalists up into the mountains of W.Pak. to show them their control of the area and their determination, with the help of captured American weaponry, to wage tireless guerrilla war against the ‘moderate’ Mueslis of the Pak Army (the self-proclaimed ‘victories’ of which had been based largely on beardies relocating simply to more defensible terrain) (AFP, 18 xi; Newser, 18 xi; GroundReport, 18 xi). Meanwhile, idiot-led Britain solemnly debated whether it might or might not build more girls-schools’n’roads’n’ospitals in IED-littered Afghanistan, which most serious Muesli fighters had long vacated; on no account would Britain imperil its liberal-bigot multiculturalism by executing Muesli traitors or demolishing mosques. (Even within Pakistan itself, Taliban militants had long been destroying girls’ schools at a rate of one per week (Yahoo News, 17 xi).)

American military and intelligence officials believed that the Taliban ruling council, or shura, which commanded and controlled jihad efforts in Afghanistan, had abandoned their historic base in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar and crossed the border into Quetta (in south-west Pak, halfway between the capital Islamabad and the great southern port of Karachi). In token of mad-Muesli determination, scores more were killed and injured by bombs in Peshawar, Lahore and Islamabad – bringing the monthly total of terrorist-inflicted deathjs in those cities to 400.

In Islamabad, confusion reigned: politicians were divided as to whether to do deals with the Taliban, to insist Americans seal the Afpak border to prevent more Taliban fighters getting into Pak, or whether to worry chiefly that India was using the Taliban as a convenient ally (Globe & Mail, 19 xi); others said Islamabad was already actually run by the Taliban and that Afghan elites were preparing to leave with their money (extracted from poppy-growing farmers) as soon as President Barry Obarmy’s ten-week-long indecision proved terminal.


The Éirish, who had flooded their half of Ireland with Blacks/Mueslis in pursuit of their own slave labour society ooops economic growth (see previous), found themselves knocked out of the footie World Cup thanks to cheating (‘handball’ – Times, 19 xi; Daily Mail, 19 xi, ‘Hand of God II’) by France’s star ‘gentleman’ Black striker Thierry-Henry (of Guadeloupe/Martinique parentage, reared in Paris and at Arsenal). (Previously, the most famous soccer cheat had been octaroon Argentinian Diego Maradonna whose “hand of God” had handballed England out of the World Cup in 1986.)


As the leaders of the EU’s 27 countries convened in Brussels for din-dins to elect a President [Rip Van Rumpy de Pumpy] and Foreign Minister (aka ‘High Representative’) [Dame Paddy Ashdown], it turned out that the long-held ambition of the UK’s ex-PM, Rev. A.R.P. Bliar, to get a top job on the gravy train was to be frustrated principally by dumpling German Chancellorette Angela Merkel who, familiar with the problems of Berlin, had no intention of going along with Anglo-American counter-ethnic, White-guilt ideas of admitting Turkey (pop. 75K and growing by 1.3% annually) to EU’s Christian (or at least post-Christian) club.


As the case of mad-Muesli Major Hasan rolled on towards the beginning of what would doubtless be a five-year, multibillion-dollar process of trial and appeals to ensure the murderer of his ‘human rights,’ brave top-drawer Irish journalist Ruth Dudley Edwards detailed how Americans had come to dread being accused of Islamophobia – not least because out-of-court settlements with ‘offended’ Mueslis had become extremely costly in a country where ‘justice’ had fallen largely into the hands of left-multiculti lawyers (Independent [Dublin], 17 xi).


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Monday, November 16, 2009


After seven years of multi-million-dollar trials, appeals etc., America – a country having 5% of the world’s people and 66% of its lawyers (these minority-venerating ‘human rights’ spivs and cultural communists being especially over-represented in the Democrat Party [e.g. the Clintons and Obama – cf. Britain’s Blairs]) – got around to executing terry-towel-haired race supremacist John Allen Muhammad, 48, the sniper who had terrorised Washington by random shootings [murdering ten] in 2002 (Guardian, 11 xi), said by co-accused to have wanted to extort money to set up a terrorist training camp in Canada.

At the same time, ‘human rights’-mad America announced it might think of getting round to putting on public trial a repulsive-looking, fat and hairy mad Muesli and several pals for the 3000 deaths of ‘9/11/2001’ which the accused Mohammed had plotted in Afpak from 1996 (Sun, 13 xi)


As a 16-yr-old was ‘detained’ for (a mere) three years after abducting and raping a 5-yr-old (having previously been given a ‘community service order’ for raping a Manchester 7-yr-old) it turned out that MSM could not “for legal reasons” give his name, race, social class or educational level (Sun, 11 xi).


Hilariously, the British Government decided to “apologize” for its predecessors having taken-into-care children of 1930-1970 to Oz (widely known at the time as ‘The Workers’ Paradise’) (BBC, 15 xi). Still more hilariously, the Australian Government apologized for its own predecessors’ part in accepting some half a million kids from their wet, smoggy and bankrupt homeland; and journalists did not even ask for proof that any general harm had resulted from the initiative (which had allowed Britain’s unwanted children to grow up on sun-kissed Australian farms with only the occasional episode of paedofumbling (nothing more than the average orphan would have experienced in scouting-mad Britain of those days).

Nor did the idiotic peecee Governments apparently appreciate that it was common practice in Britain of the 1930s to send uncared-for kids to the countryside as farm labour – e.g. orphans of Glasgow were often sent to new homes in the Western Isles. I myself, an adoptee from Preston, spent many happy childish hours tending – for the happy reward of a 4oz. bar of chocolate per week – the North London garden and allotment of the loving Anglican parents who had taken me in.

It remained to be seen whether the Adoptees of Oz would rise up against those who whinged on their behalf and say a decent thank you to those who had rescued them from having to grow up with single mothers in the likes of Barnsley and ‘Uddersfield.


The first Miss England to be a Black (well, half-Black), leggy heptathlete Rachel Christie (niece of Black male athlete Linford Christie), put her other gifts on show as she brawled at a porn-themed Manchester nightclub party over her (hunky, Black) boyfriend with his previous (White) girlfriend, another beauty queen, Sara Jones, Miss Manchester, on whose face Rachel landed several punches (Daily Telegraph, 7 xi) after Sara (dressed as a cavegirl) relayed to Rachel by mobile phone an apparently admiring text message which Sara had received from her previous man.

{At least Rachel had the good grace to resign as Miss England once taken to police cells and given bail to begin the fight to clear her name – a model, as it were, to Britain’s disgraced politicians who had led the country to mass third-world immigration, national bankruptcy, two failed wars, loss of sovereignty [to Brussels] and educational idiocy and couldn’t fix within even a year the massive scandal of their own expenses [on ‘flipped’ second homes, duck houses, moats, meat pies, ginger crinkle biscuits etc.].}

Blacks at a wedding reception in Tampa, Florida, provided another talent parade as fighting broke out among some forty wedding guests (AmRen, 11 xi).


After a year of pussyfooting, peecee organs like the Sun (9 xi) and the BBC got round to admitting that Pakistan (not Afghanistan) was the main home of Al-Qaeda/Bin-Liner and in particular that there had been a new planned assault on New York that was detected by British intelligence services. Britain itself had taken in 1½M Pakistanis and their illiterate ‘arranged’ wives so it had long been deemed politic not to mention the mad Mueslis of Wazyurdrinkistan – though while the silence went on, the Muesli goons had probably spread themselves throughout the Punjab.


Showing how far the anti-racist peecee infection had spread in America, the Army and FBI announced they found Palestinian-parented, mosque-maniacal (though also pornshow-visiting), soldier-shooting psychiatrist Maj. Hasan (see previous), hailed as a “hero” by the Virginia imam who had preached to several of the 9/11 suicide bombers, to have no links to Muesli terror – but the tabloid New York Post begged to differ (10 xi), the New York Daily Post spoke of America’s “naivety” (10 xi) and the influential National Post suggested Hasan’s massacre might in reality be attributed to “hysterical institutional anti-racism” (10 xi). It transpired that Hasan’s colleagues and (especially) students had been discussing for at least 18 months whether he was psychotic (NPR, 11 xi).


The Government’s ‘drugs czar’ who had been forced into resignation, Professor David Nutt (see previous), continued to draw support as UCL’s Professor Gurling explained that the slight link between schizophrenia and cannabis use could easily be due to schizoid tendencies making pot attractive to sufferers, as Even Harris MP (LibDem) urged Home Secretary ‘Postman Pat’ Johnson to improve his drugs committee’s contract with its scientists, and as three more members of the committee resigned (one a psychologist) – meaning that the committee had lost 40% of its scientific members (Guardian, 10 xi; Times, 10 xi). Mr Johnson said that a statement of principles on the independence of government science advice, proposed by more than 50 senior scientists, was being considered by the Prime Minister and the Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor John Beddington. Professor Nutt said of the resignations: “I’m not surprised. The way I have been treated was reprehensible, and I’m pleased to have the support of these other council members.”

The Indie’s Johann Hari set out the libertarian case in Huffington Post (10 xi) (adding to 1960s arguments the successful decriminalization of drug use in Portugal since 2001). Simon Barrow, co-director of the think-tank Ekklesia commented: “The outcome of a meeting described by the Government as ‘very constructive’ has been the resignation of another three scientific experts on the misuse of drugs. This aptly illustrates the air of unreality around current policy and its unease about evidence-based advice or comment.” However, the Daily Mail found a judge who believed in cannabis-induced psychosis (11 xi).

A charitable donor had offered to set up a drugs advisory committee independent of government, said Nutty (Public Service, 12 xi) – apparently content with this sideshow in the absence of wider protestations against Postman Pat and governmental suppression of expert free speech (inspired by the 12-year-old example set by Edinburgh LUniversity). – For a more robust approach to NuLabour censorship (sadly backed by tabloid-terrified ‘Tories’), Nutty needed to link up with the Guardian’s Deborah Orr (12 xi). (So spaced out was Nutty that (he admitted) in his eight years of service as chairman of ACDM, he had only met a Home Secretary once – and that was Postman Pat who summoned him to be reproved for his naughtiness. Far from being libertarian, Nutty was generally in favour of criminalization or at least restriction – especially of alcohol (Spiked, 12 xi).)

Not content with ‘exposing’ the spelling mistakes of PM Brown (yielding the most sympathetic press that half-blind Brown had had in years), the Sun decided to draw attention to the whacky websites of Nutty’s children – including a picture of a 26-year son ‘prancing NAKED in the snow in Sweden’, thought by the Sun likely to shock its readers to their cotton socks.


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Monday, November 09, 2009


After four decades of the ‘anti-racist’ left (and cowardly ‘conservative’ dimwits) eroding freedom of speech in Britain (and more widely in the West), the case of top neuropharmacologist Professor David Nutt, MRCP MRCPsych FRCPsych FMedSci. being arm-twisted into retirement for insufficient hysteria about cannabis (see previous) brought belated squeaks from newly nostalgic liberals. The left-flagship Observer (1 xi) admitted the sacking was "another milestone in Britain's progression from a great Enlightenment country to a place where prejudice reigns."

After two days to consider the matter, six of the Government’s 31-strong (unpaid -- surprisingly) Advisory Committee on the Misuse of Drugs were said to be ready to back their Chairman by themselves resigning (Independent, 1 xi). Richard Garside, the director of the Centre for Crime and Justice at King's College London, accused Home Secretary Johnson of undermining scientific research, saying "I'm shocked and dismayed that [Johnson] appears to believe that political calculation trumps honest and informed scientific opinion."

The former home secretary, Charles Clarke, called for a major review of drugs policy and urged ministers not to "isolate themselves" from science, saying the work of the advisory council had always been "extremely valuable" when he was at the Home Office. The Galton Institute’s Lord Winston added his backing to Professor Nutt, noting that he was “very surprised and disappointed” that the Government had acted in a “knee jerk” fashion.

For the Spectator (1 xi), Alex Massie blamed “the increasinginly buffoonish Chris Grayling [Conservative Shadow Home Secretary for seeming] to have decided that his mission in politics is to prove that he can be every bit as moronically doctrinaire and authoritarian as his Labour counterparts.” Ian Stolerman, Emeritus Professor of Behavioural Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, called on Alan Johnson to reinstate Professor Nutt. The Independent’s top columnist, Bruce Anderson, backed Nutt and made the wider point that “The right to free speech and free expression can never be taken for granted, especially under this government” (2 xi).

Dr Les King, a chemist of unsurpassed technical knowledge and Head of the Drugs Intelligence Unit in the Forensic Science Service, quit the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs and said the Home Secretary had denied the chairman’s right to free speech when sacking him (Times, 1 xi). Dr King disputed that Professor Nutt had somehow crossed what King called “the imaginary line between science and politics.” A member of ACMD since 2001, King said: “Amongst the [fifteen] scientists, I think a number will resign. It doesn't need the whole council to resign for the thing to stop working.”

King’s resignation was swiftly followed by that of Marion Walker, a pharmacologist who was also clinical director of Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust's substance misuse service (Telegraph, 1 xi). Professor Nutt, who had four children of 18-26, said he believed the position of the council was thus “untenable”, adding “I can’t believe any self-respecting scientist would serve on it.” He accused politicians of wanting to engage in ‘posturing one-upmanship’ by parading as tough on hash.

However, HMG’s long-standing Chief Medical Officer for England, Sir Liam Donaldson, told BBC 1's Andrew Marr Show that rows between advisers and politicians were best kept behind closed doors: "I think to find yourself in a situation like this is very controversial. "These things are best sorted out behind the scenes so that the government and their advisers can go to the public with a united front." The Maudsley’s Professor Robin Murray said Nutty had underestimated the paranoid-inducing power of skunk (though Professor Hugh Girling, Molecular Psychiatry, UCL told the Indie, 2 xi, that in 35 years practice he had scarcely come across a case of ‘cannabis psychosis’ without their being a family history of schizophrenia); the Coventry Telegraph called Nutty “Professor Pillock” (2 xi). The Telegraph’s Daniel Hanan deplored kowtowing to ‘the experts of Britain’s left-dominated functionariat’ (2 xi). And Supreme Leader Brown threw his weight behind his Home Secretary Angry Alan. Correspondents of the Times were divided (3 xi).

{The first problem had really been that Nutt and his committee should never have attempted a unilinear ranking of the overall ‘harm’ caused by different drugs (which have such diverse properties as ‘killing a few people quickly’, ‘killing many people slowly’, ‘creating dependency’, ‘creating social disruption [incl. family breakup],’ ‘not killing users at all but just turning a very few of them paranoid’). The committee should surely have stuck to indicating the rather distinct dangers caused by different drugs and letting Johnson weight them as he would. (It was specially strange that Nutt did not adopt this multiple-factor approach since his own talk on TV was conducted in terms of the plural neologism “harms.”) The second problem was that uneducated Johnson himself, without his experts at a weekend, was quite incapable of making that argument; yet, instead of just shelving the matter with a word of genial thanks to Nutt, he wanted revenge for Nutt’s public insistence that cannabis be reclassified as a mere Class C drug (as it had been under Rev. Bliar, contrary to Supreme Leader Brown’s own tabloid-acceptant illiberalism.}


Furious Science Minister Lord Grayson denounced Postman Pat Johnson to the Prime Minister, said the Sun (3 xi), complaining he had not been consulted before the know-nothing Home Secretary had sacked one of Britain’s top scientists (Prof. Nutty – see previous). Liberal-leftist pressure on HMG continued as respected ex-Oxford parapsychologist Sue Blackmore denounced the sacking as “despicable” (Guardian, 3 xi). {In all this mayhem among Labourites, no-one outside this diary/blog recognized it was time for Nutty to be re-instated so long as he really did some ‘free speaking’ about exactly how his ‘evidence’ had been massaged to show alcohol was, on balance and in general, more “harmful” than pot. Following any such breakthrough, Richard Lynn, Phil Rushton and I could do some franker free speaking about the wastefulness of handouts to the low-IQ – especially if they had no religion to keep them in order.


While Britain’s ageing fatties reached ever more obscene proportions (including a ‘food-addicted’ man of 70 stone who had to be taken to hospital by lorry) thanks to the ‘free at the point of use’ National ‘Health’ Service, Britain’s delicious young girls continued showing the respect for the Waist-Hip Ratio that had put them ahead of even science itself in the 1990s (Sun, 3 xi).


The intrepid and persistent Steve Sailer continued his battle (under FOIA procedures) to get figures from America’s Federal Reserve Banks of just what sums had vanished in minority foreclosures on mortgages -- eliciting in the process that, in California of 2004-6, 51% of mortgage lending had been to minorities, who (after adjustment for income) were almost three times as likely to default as Whites and so probably accounted for some 70% of all dollars lost in California (VDare, 1 xi).


As West- and Middle-European countries finally abandoned their sovereignty to Brussels (and its Lisbon Treaty), their wretched politicians were rapidly rewarded with what they craved in their egalitarian religious mania, a ban on all “offensive” speech critical of minorities and on all discriminatory practices (Brussels Journal, 26 x). Even Christian gatherings would be obliged to ensure double beds in all b&b’s for yags and adulterers, reminding everyone vividly of the freedom of choice that had been ended in Europe’s Muesli-importing slave labour state.


Embattled outspeaker David Nutt (see previous) found his latter-day hippiedom supported as the Government’s own Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor John Beddington CMG [‘Call Me God’] FRS (Imperial College), got round to backing him about the low “harms” of cannabis (if not about his right to have a public spat with Home Secretaru Johnson); and a new study by Matthew Hickman, Reader in Public Health and Epidemiology at the University of Bristol, found that literally thousands of heavy-pot-using young people would have to stop smoking the drug to prevent even a single case of schizophrenia or psychosis — the Government’s main justification for reclassifying it as a ‘dangerous’ Class B drug (Times, 4 xi). Even the usually Labour-loyal Daily Mirror had its star columnist Kevin Maguire call the Home Secretary “Dopey Alan” and “Calamity Johnson” (4 xi). Best-known Scot-Nat Margo MacDonald also backed Nutty in the lib-left Edinburgh Evening News (4 xi). Nutty himself was allowed to explain in the soft-left Indie that his ACMD team had been “fatally flawed” and needed to be re-established with the same independence as the Bank of England. (4 xi).

(A Newcastle U. lecturer wrote to the Telegraph that the drug ecstasy could have bad effects if mixed with alcohol; but such division among experts served further to highlight Labour’s hopefully terminal idiocy in trying to punish even mere free speech by the highest-ranking scientists.)

That the fault line in the debate would split the right seemed clear as A. N. Wilson in the Daily Mail caricatured scientists as “arrogant gods of certainty”. Nutty gave as good as he got, accusing the Prime Minister of ‘putting public health at risk’ and of ‘making ridiculous statements’ (ABC News [Australia], 4 xi); and top Times columnist Simon Jenkins accused Brown of “political cowardice” (3 xi). The Independent’s Matthew Norman thought Johnson’s new authoritarianism (together with his apology for Labour’s mass immigration policy) a shameless power play, aimed at winning him the Labour leadership as Supreme Stalinist Brown crashed (5 xi).


The Maudsley’s Emeritus Professor Sir Michael Rutter, 70, went on Radio 4 (4 xi, 16:30) to explain the results of his long-term study of children who had suffered gross early deprivation in the ‘nurseries’ of Communist Romania (into which they had been abandoned because parents could not afford to look after them). Apparently, the first six months of deprivation had no serious effect once the children were rescued; children whose deprivation lasted longer had no mentionable general problems with intelligence or emotionality, but they were more likely to have special persistent problems such as autism and hyperactivity – especially if their wretched early diets had interfered with brain growth (as measured by head size). (More here; and NB that Prof Rutter was too polite to rub the noses of wild-eyed Rousseau-followers in his work.)


Far from contenting himself with defending free speech for top scientists, Prof. David Nutt came out in his true colours, demanding a tripling of alcohol prices (much as I had myself recommended in 1979 – Times, 19 xii 1979, ‘Alcoholism’; Sunday Independent [Dublin], c. 1 i 1980, ‘Sobering thought!’). Alcohol is the “gateway drug” that remains the greatest threat to society, and the Government’s failure to address the problem epitomises its disregard for scientific evidence, said Nutty to an audience at the Science Media Centre in London (Times, 5 xi). Professor Nutt said he felt that alcohol prices could be raised to triple the price at which some drinks were sold, with taxation the most obvious way of achieving this.

{Nutty did not apparently realize that low drink prices and high third-world immigration had become the politicians’ major techniques for making palatable the sheer boredom, irresponsibility, idiocy and criminality of Britain’s ‘welfare state’ over the previous fifty years. – It was in 1983 that Maggie had given up and said “the National Health Service is safe in our hands.” By November 2009, things had got so bad that Britain found itself sucked into a Brussels-dominated Europe and losing five soldiers in a day as they ‘trained’ Afghani policemen without the slightest conspicuous protest – not even a demand for the razing of mosques.}

The cross-party Parliamentary Committee for Science and Technology wrote to Johnson and other top brass to inquire what on earth was going on (Metro, 5 xi). However, in the House of Lords, skunk was blamed for some of the problems of their lordships’ younger family members.


The New Scientist carried an article burbling the usual half-arsed guff that ‘there must be something more than the g factor’ and purporting to find promise in the notion of ‘rational thinking’ – long known to fail in even quite bright people faced with counter-intuitive, logical or just plain tricky and unaccustomed tasks. Apparently:

As an illustration of how rational-thinking ability differs from intelligence, consider this puzzle: if it takes five machines 5 minutes to make five widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets? Most people instinctively jump to the wrong answer that "feels" right - 100 - even if they later amend it. When Shane Frederick at the Yale School of Management in New Haven, Connecticut, put this and two similarly counter-intuitive questions to about 3400 students at various colleges and universities in the US - Harvard and Princeton among them - only 17 per cent got all three right (see "Test your thinking"). A third of the students failed to give any correct answers (Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol 19, p 25).

Very interesting! So where was the test of ‘rational thinking’? Answer: there wasn’t one despite thirty years of effort by IQ-bashing cogniwallahs! (For five ability dimensions actually having passable measurability and independence of g, see Chapter 1 of The g Factor.)


As US President Barry Hussein Obarmy went on air (5 xi, 10p.m., GMT) to deal with the killing of 13 soldiers and the injuring of 31 others at the world’s biggest military base, Fort Hood, Texas (home to 65K military personnel plus 80K dependents), he could not even bring his benighted self to consider that the killer (who had shouted “Allah Akbar” as he opened fire) might have been a Muesli – as indeed he was.

Never had the lies of the West’s politicians have been so dramatically exposed. The heavily-eyebrowed Malik Nadal Hasan was a single Army psychiatrist, a 39-year-old major, who had received ‘poor’ ratings before being sent to Texas. See here. He had apparently converted ‘late in life’ to Islam; but his parentage and racial origins could not be mentioned by the American media, nor by his ‘change you can believe in’ Black President who had bamboozled America and had never been recorded as using the word ‘terror.’ What Americans would make of this outrage was an interesting question – hopefully they would prove more robust than the moronic and cowardly politicians of Euroland.

Subsequently, Obarmy called the Muesli outrage merely “a horrific outburst of violence” – as if it were a tropical storm or epileptic fit rather than mass murder stemming from Islamic ideology and intended to assert dominance and lead via terror to tyranny.

Hasan had attended high school in Roanoke, Virginia, studied biochemistry at Virginia Tech, played sports, hadn’t got into any trouble, and appeared to be a normal, well-adjusted individual, said a cousin, Nader Hasan. Major Hasan had been a psychiatry resident at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington and was apparently working at Fort Hood during the pre-deployment process for soldiers headed to Iraq and Afghanistan. The guns he used in his massacre were not of standard Army issue – so he had smuggled them into Fort Hood.

Hasan had been a studious child of comfortably-off Arab parents who ran down-market restaurants and groceries. His father had arrived in the USA at age 16 from Palestine; he died in 1998 and his wife, Hasan’s mother, died three years later (Raonoke Times, 6 xi;, 6 xi). After these deaths, most of the rest of the Hasan family relocated to Palestine.

{How a quiet and probably mixed-up homosexual/misogynist Muslim who was not a fighter even as a child, opposed the War on Terror, devoutedly attended mosques in his Army uniform, did not get on well with his patients and praised suicide bombing openly on the internet could have been promoted to being an Army major psychiatrist beggared belief – though such official hysterical ‘denial’ was in line with the general reluctance of Western peecee politicians and MSM to admit that human individual and group differences were of the slightest importance.

Just as PeeCee-propagandized Brits had thought they could ‘train’ rag-taggle Afghanis taken without selection off the street to be ‘policemen’ – yielding five dead British soldiers in one day in early November – so the Americans thought a weirdo like Hasan would be just fine as an Army psychiatrist so long has he was given a medical degree (from an Army ‘university’) and put in uniform. Talk about ‘the lunatics running the asylum’!

This analysis was similarly volunteered by Jeff Crouere ( [Louisiana], 6 xi) who added that Hasan was seen in full Muslim regalia in a supermarket just hours before the massacre and that his anti-War-on-Terror views had been well known for at least six months to Army colleagues. Meanwhile, 24 hours after the shooting President Barry and his Barmy Army were still professing themselves puzzled at Hasan’s motivation and insisting that “speculation” should wait upon the initiation, process and conclusion of “investigations.”}


Asked to comment on the death of two-year-old New Zealand boy Karl Perigo-Check, the son of a convicted murderer and notorious gang member, Michael Laws, the Mayor of the boy’s home town, Wangunni, enraged the local great and good by suggesting that paid sterilization of the “underclass” would help reduce such problems of child killing and abuse (Dominion Post [Wellington], 30 x).


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.


Sunday, November 01, 2009


Sometimes thought of as the last hope of the White race, Russia managed, with the help of much pro-birth advertising and encouragement, to get its birth rate in 2008 up to the highest level for twenty years (AmRen, 24 x) – though whether the enthusiasm of most AmRen correspondents was justified while Russia remained a 20% Muslim country remained to be seen


Adding to his sympathy vote after his Daniel-in-the-lions’-den performance on Question Time, the old-left Sunday Mirror (25 x) ‘revealed’ that Griffin’s mother-in-law considered him a “workshy, deluded and fame-hungry pretender” – though the treacherous woman, 72, admitted he was kind and had made her daughter happy through 25 years of successful marriage (yielding four children).


As TV Channel 4 allowed Richard Lynn and Phil Rushton 1-minute slots to mention idiot-level home truths about IQ and race, youthful mixed-race presenter Rageh Omaar proceeded to muddy the waters by producing ‘genius’ ‘Black’ students at U. Chicago – who on inspection were plainly 85% White – and getting a delapidated Prof. Steve Jones and communist Prof. Steve Rose to assert that IQ tests were ‘racist’ (“militating against the developing world” [e.g. Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China etc??...]) and failed to measure creativity etc.; but in the course of all the simple-minded lunacy (incl. from a Black ‘anthropologist’ [called ‘Lez’] who thought London School ideas had never been challenged), Omaar admitted that “many” researchers/scientists had refused to contribute to the programme – evidently locked in deep bunkers and fearing for their jobs. Needless to say, the names of the braver Galton, Spearman, Burt, Eysenck and Jensen were never mentioned.


A gene allowing motorists to learn some 20% more from 15 laps on a simulator was reported by Californian scientists (Science Daily, 28 x) – though whether it was related to IQ was not stated.


Although paedohysteria reached unprecedented levels in Britain, with parents barred from supervising their own children in Watford playgrounds unless they had a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) check, the Labour Government allowed Afghanistan’s classical paedophilic practices to continue, with Afghani officials and troops raping and otherwise molesting young boys in areas liberated by the British Army (Spectator, 28 x, 29 x).


Despite half a generation of multiculti propaganda and the appointment of snoopers in schools, British teachers were reporting ‘racist’ playground incidents at the rate of 40K p.a. (AmRen, 29 x).


As the High Court in Edinburgh dispatched Scotland’s largest-ever ‘paedophile ring’ to many years in jail, it turned out that at least one of them, David Rennie, was homosexual – indeed a ‘LGBT’ executive (The Herald, 29 x), giving a bad blow to the usual yag protestations that homosexuality had no serious overlap with paedophilia, protestations that had led the public to prosecute paeds maximally while leaving yags off the hook.


As Ethiopia moved into its second major famine in 26 years, it turned out that the intervening 25 years since the previous massive Western famine relief effort had been used to more than double the country’s population from 34M to at least 72M, prompting brave Irish Independent columnist Kevin Myers to remark (30 x), “This is stupidity on an epic scale, for which only Ethiopia is answerable” – though IQ and the work of Richard Lynn were not expressly mentioned since Myers had already had the Eirish Gardai (police) at his door for his previous realism about Africa.


The excellent (if not markedly freedom-asserting) National Policy Institute (founded in 2005 to challenge the Southern Poverty Law Centre and headed by the likes of Louis Andrews, Kevin Lamb and Kevin Macdonald) came up with a study estimating the cost of ‘diversity’ to America in trillions of dollars (30 x).


As Detroit’s population fell by 50% to yield hundreds of thousands of deserted buildings among its 1M remaining Black residents and crime and filth everywhere, two economists reckoned the once-thriving car city’s problems were self-inflicted (City Journal, Autumn 2009): “Though some blame Detroit’s population losses on larger economic forces, economists Edward Glaeser and Andrei Shleifer argue in a groundbreaking paper that the city’s problems are mostly self-inflicted. (The paper, called “The Curley Effect,” gets its name from legendary Boston mayor James Curley, who favored Irish residents and pushed other groups out.) After winning election in 1973, Detroit’s first black mayor, Coleman Young, consolidated his power, driving white residents, who had voted against him, out of the city by withdrawing services from their neighborhoods. Eventually, Glaeser and Shleifer write, Detroit became “an overwhelmingly black city mired in poverty and social problems”—and shrinking fast.”


Upset by scientific advice that cannabis (3M regular UK users) was on average less harmful than alcohol (30M regular users), dimwit British politico ‘Postman Pat’ Johnson – instead of just shelving the advice with thanks -- demanded the resignation of his leading drugs adviser at the Home Office, Professor David Nutt (Imperial College) (RecentNews, 30 x) – possibly triggering further resignations and even a wider debate about why the government did not respect scientists’ conclusions about the g factor, streaming, race and the inadvisability of pouring good money after bad into Africa. Unlike Richard Lynn and myself, Professor Nutt promptly received the support of the Guardian, the Liberal Party, Facebookers and fellow professors Maurice Elphick (Queen Mary College, London) (Reuters, 31 x), Sir Leszek Borysiewicz (chief executive of the Medical Research Council), and Colin Blakemore (former MRC head, Oxford University) – but not of Peter Hitchens (Daily Mail, 31 x) or the Conservative Party which evidently wished to continue the lucrative taxation of best-selling drugs and the savage crackdowns on ‘illegal substances’ beloved of tabloid newspapers and felt Nutt had ‘strayed too far into politics.’ Nutt soon added fuel to the flames by calling the Cabinet “a bunch of irrational Luddites” (Times, 31 x). It was not the first time Nutt's comments on drugs and the censorious Grumpy Gordon Brown had hit the headlines -- earlier in 2009, Nutt had said taking ecstasy (12 deaths p.a.) was no more dangerous than riding a horse (30 deaths p.a.).


Using a new index of national “well-being” (including income, self-reported happiness, domestic security, stability of marriage freedom and educational level), the Legatum Institute made Finland the world’s top country (among the 104 having adequate data), with the USA coming in at ninth position and the UK at merely twelfth (thanks to the dismal educational arrangements of the ‘comprehensive schools’ and to over-regulation). All the top twelve countries were largely White and towards the top of Lynn & Vanhanen’s IQ estimates: 1 Finland; 2 Switzerland; 3 Sweden; 4 Denmark; 5 Norway; 6 Australia; 7 Canada; 8 Netherlands; 9 United States; 10 New Zealand; 11 Éire; 12 United Kingdom.


Comments? Email Chris Brand.
Some history.