Monday, September 29, 2014


Despite having arranged (at taxpayers’ expense) a two-year-long referendum campaign about Scottish separatism (q.v.), producing the clear race-based result that the Anglo-Saxons of north, east and south Scotland (and even north-west Glasgow) wanted to keep the UK together, Britain’s wretched political vermin – who could never mention such realities as those of the Irish, Blacks and Pakistanis, let alone of their own 60-year suppression of free speech – promptly spurned the happy opportunity for consensus with which they had been provided by the Scottish vote.

In Westminster, PM Daft Dave decided – within just a day of the historic referendum – that he would retrospectively qualify his promise of more powers to Scotland with a requirement of more powers for England (thereby ratting on his ‘Better Together’ allies Grumpy Gordon and Mealy-mouthed Millilitre and their ‘Labour’ party, which would lose 40 Westminster seats); and, not to be outdone, SNP leader Alex Fishpaste, though having appeared honourably to resign, stepped forward to spearhead a Scottish Unilateral Declaration of Independence.

With politicos thus dumping at their convenience the super-lengthy referendum process in which they had appeared to believe (so long as taxpayer-funded), the people of Britain were thus thrown back on to the bedrock of race, promise-keeping and parliamentarianism – though their actual Parliaments had been taken over by slippery charlatans (in Westminster) and obese lesbians (in Holyrood) who would rat on anything to secure their next week in office (or, rather, on holiday, for the Parliaments seldom met and were largely empty when they did so).

Yes, the people had spoken, but they could not be trusted by the shivering suits! Denial of the simple truths of race and IQ had led from one problem to another.


 Truth-telling racism was given a lift, and socialism given another downhill push, as a Labour candidate MP for Preston took it on himself to denounce heroic Nobelist Sir Winston Churchill as a “racist and White supremacist” (D.Mail, 23 ix). The nutty denigrator Benjamin [sic] Whittingham made his comment as Churchill’s face began to be used by the Bank of England on the £5 note.

Like probably many of his ilk, Whittingham probably did not know that all intellectuals of the past were ‘racist’, that most people still were, and that science supported them. In a 2002 BBC poll Sir Winston had been voted the Greatest Briton in history – chiefly for for his role standing up to Nazi Germany. Whether Comrade Benjamin was prepared to denounce Mohammed as a pederast, Henry VIII as a psychopath, Shakespeare as a sodomite or Hitler as a vegetarian was unknown.


 The West having failed to with the ‘diverse’/pacific/demakrazic regimes which it had tried to foster in Afghooniland, Eyeraq and Gadawfuland ooops Libya, manufactured a ‘coalition’ (including Shitite and Solunni countries) to justify having a pop at the 25K Solunni jihadists of ISIL who had taken over a slice of the Arabian peninsula about the size of France.

Not that the Muesloonytunes were likely to be of material assistance to Nobelist Bomber Barry, despite their vast stocks of US-supplied weaponry – with Saudi keeping 690 of its 700 America-supplied jets hors de combat; and the country with the largest army in the area, Solunni Turkey, was conspicuous by its absence from despatches – apparently waiting to set up its own caliphate in the area once the West had got rid of the worst Solunni fanatics (who had an enthusiasm for rape and beheading which quite put Europe of 1914-1945 in the shade in the quality if not quantity of their savagery).

Bombing made great progress, continuing the vast destruction which Mueslis had already wrought on themselves in Libya, Gaza, Syria, Iraq etc; but just what the West’s jets would do once the beardy-weirdy towel-heads disappeared into the vast sands of Arabia was entirely unclear.

Having in 1956 jettisoned the control that Britain and France (and increasingly Israel) had over middle-East Mueslis, America found its supplies of guns, humanitarians and burgers to Arab dictatorships ooops theocracies were insufficient: the US had bombed seven times in the course of Black Barack Hussein’s six-year presidency -- Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and now Syria (Independent, 25 ix).

Britain’s LibCon Coalition (with Labour in tow) was equally wedded to a little multiculti bombing, happy to send six Tornadoes which might sometime bomb from Cyprus so long as it could be made to appear that passable numbers of Shitite and Solunni politicos all ‘agreed.’ {The idea of just letting the Mueslis get on with their own civil war – the West having already spent trillions on ‘helping’ them – scarcely occurred, at least on Western TV screens.

Though the West had completely failed in its project of a multiculti Iraq, its response was an international multiculti coalition in which the Sunnis of Sunni- and Binliner-funding Saudi and Qatar would oblige America by pretending to attack the Sunnis of ISIL... Yes, the latest multiculti wheeze was not to achieve such manageable targets as expelling Madman Insane from Kuwait or stringing him up but to do battle from the air with ideologues spread across a vast desert, accompanied by their selected Yazidi wives. No wonder Pres.Barry had said the ‘war’ would take not months but decades!}


 The fondest idea of socialists and ‘social scientists,’ that poverty was intergenerationally transmitted as cause and effect, was dealt a severe blow as Office of National Statistics figures on 13,500 British kids found that their ending up poor at 30 (without a washing machine, TV, phone etc) was quite unrelated to whether their parents had been poor but was instead massively predicted by whether their parents had ranked as educationally low-level at school (D.Mail, 24 ix).

The report said: “There is no evidence of a relationship between severe material deprivation now and the financial situation of the household as a child once education is controlled for.” {Needless to say, the role of IQ in influencing life chances was not given a mention.}


 As America’s latest ‘coalition of the half-hearted ooops willing’ got going zooming ‘bunker-busting’ (‘Paveway IV,’ ‘Brimstone’ and ‘Storm Shadow’) GPS-guided bombs into occasional undefended or ‘human-shielded’ buildings in the sands of Iraq/Syria, the question arose of what the West had done wrong in the ghastly A(rabia)/A(frica) area – apart from not squashing Catholicism and providing the stimulus to (mainly eugenic) birth control that had helped lift Mao’s China to rival the US economy in just a generation.

As Westernized Muesli feminoid intellectuals falteringly – and unavailingly -- toyed with the equality that ‘modernizers’ had encouraged, an old question arose. Plainly the modern A/A world involved men with AK47s and colourfully-dressed women weeping over their babies; so outright polygamy might have been better – allowing successful men to do most of the breeding. But the West’s policy of backing female emancipation and education had, in particular, proved to be a spectacular failure.

It was, first of all, the gun-toting men of A/A  who needed education – within a structure like the historic Christian church which (especially under Orthodoxy and Protestantism) would promote them (if they succeeded) and make them magnets for women (whose own education would come later as women accepted education as the ideal for themselves and their progeny).

Instead of pouring weaponry into A/A, the West should have provided the much cheaper alternative of subsidized places for bright A/A boys in its ‘universities’ – thus incidentally giving those shelfstacker-producing institutions with a serious function. The ancient demand of the Catholic church that its privileged monks and priests speak Latin should have been matched by a modern Western demand for A/A young men to master grammatical English and household economics – and then to enjoy the life of Riley.

Ukip vs PeeCee

As it campaigned to win a parliamentary by-election in ‘Heywood & Middleton’ (near Manchester), Nigel Farage’s United Kingdom Independence Party gave its anti-EUSSR policies a back seat and concentrated on what was, to most basic White Labour voters, the more immediate problem of weenie-pimping misogynist Pak psychopaths. Statements issued by Farage and leaflets distributed by his party blamed Labour’s “love affair” with “immigration, political correctness and multiculturalism” for the betrayal of “white working-class girls” (Guardian, 26 ix).

Farage told his party’s annual conference (in Doncaster  -- Red Ed Milliband’s constituency): “What we have seen in Rotherham in particular – but there have been other examples of it too – what we have seen within the one-party state [of Rotherham] as a direct result of [Labour’s] national policies and as a direct result of their own political correctness at a local level is child abuse that has taken place on a scale that I think is actually difficult for decent people to even comprehend.’

    The coming by-election, due to be held on 9 October, was triggered when the veteran Labour MP Jim Dobbin died in September. Labour figures were concerned that Ukip could overturn the party’s 5,500 majority. Farage visited the constituency and told the media: “Just look at the local grooming scandal. This is a prime example of the local authority failing to protect vulnerable residents because the people in power were more afraid of being seen as racist.” Two leaflets distributed by the party in the campaign highlighted the grooming scandal as evidence of Labour’s “betrayal of the working classes because of political correctness”.

    Ukip’s candidate, John Bickley, a businessman with historic connections to the area, said the issue of grooming was an issue that regularly came up on the doorstep as he canvassed support for the party. “It is an issue, but immigration and the fact that we are not part of the Westminster establishment are also big here,” he said, while pushing leaflets through the doors of houses.

A Survation poll commissioned by Ukip across the Heywood & Middleton constituency had shown that immigration was the top political concern. Labour insiders had grown increasingly concerned by the response they received on the doorstep. Their candidate, Liz McInnes, a ‘Unite’ [trade terrorist ooops unionist] member and NHS biochemist, was fighting her first by-election. If Ukip’s tactics were successful, there were other seats -- linked to grooming in Rochdale, Derby, Manchester and Oxford -- which would be vulnerable.

    The wretched Guardian carried a 95% admission that talk of the left’s [deliberate and long-standing] ‘mistakes’ and ‘poor practice’ had been allowed by the Guardian so as to avoid talk of ‘racist cowardice’ rather than out of ‘political correctness’ – a distinction without a difference, surely. Apparently, the cops “could not be bothered” to risk charges of racism, so they were just lazy rather than cowardly and subservient to their peecee masters....:

"[Culture/ethnicity is] relevant, but not in the way that the BNP and Ukip would claim. It is relevant because police, already not caring enough about teenage girls being abused, could not be bothered with dealing with the flak of being accused of racism; it is not because they were being ultra-careful not to target an already maligned ethnic group. The reason there was inaction and poor practice in tackling this crime early on is not political correctness but rather racist cowardice combined with a distaste for the victims. It is precisely because the liberal left has refused to tackle the thorny issues surrounding race and ethnicity that the likes of Ukip are able to colonise it so successfully."

    Ukip’s Doncaster conference ended as spectacularly as the modernized multiculti Conservative Party’s Birmingham began, with the defection of CP MP Mark Reckless, who denounced CP leader Daft Dave as quite unlikely to deliver anything conservative, let alone nationalist. The defection was given added spice by the exposure of another CP MP (and Coalition Cabinet minister) who had been exposing himself (on Facetube, Youwatch, Ipod – whatever) to what he thought was a teenagerette but was in fact a Sunday Mirror journalist.


A succinct but action-packed summary of America’s 150-year effort to turn loose Black slaves and integrate them into White society was provided in American Renaissance (Anthony Bryan, 23 ix). The result of the experiment? Complete and demonstrable failure, of course, with US jails half-full of Blacks, and with Whites terrorized into peecee mutism about the project.


 While Britain’s Rev. Tony Blair became the “gay icon” of a Noo Yawk yag magazine, Chad looked set to become the 37th country in Africa to outlaw homosexuality after government ministers voted to make same-sex relations a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison (Guardian, 22 ix). ‘Human rights’ groups were outraged at such Black misbehaviour. Florent Geel, Africa director of the International Federation of Human Rights, was quoted as saying by the Gay Star News website: “Criminalising homosexuality seems discriminatory, demagogic and counter-productive, as it may turn groups against each other.”

In August, the Gambia passed a bill imposing life imprisonment for “aggravated homosexuality” relating to repeat offenders and people living with HIV/Aids. The Gambia’s president, Yahya Jammeh, had previously told gay men and lesbians to leave the country or risk beheading.


Enthusiasts for Australia’s multicultural madness of recent years were shown the faxalife as prison officers in riot gear had to use tear gas to control maximum security inmates who tore apart Goulburn Jail, New South Wales, in a racially fuelled riot ­described as the country’s biggest in 10 years (D.Telegraph, 22 ix). With shouts of “Allah Akbar”, prisoners armed with home-made weapons {and led by Mustafa Fart and Abdullah Abdullah O’Blimey O’Riley} threatened guards and smashed through an internal fence at the state’s toughest jail, which was put into lockdown.

The rioting had not resulted from actual Muslim terrorists – who were themselves kept in even more expensive conditions of supermax security – but from their supporters repeatedly taunting guards, who had responded by withdrawing privileges {internet and Loaded use etc).

    On a brighter note, Oz was learning the lesson and expanding its latter-day policy of shifting unwanted Muesli ‘refugees’ to its surrounding dirt-poor neighbours. In a low-key five-minute ceremony, marked only by a waiter tripping over with a tray of champagne flutes,* Cambodia agreed to take £5M annually to help relieve Oz of the problems which its homegrown Irish idealists had brought about.

(Cambodia had actually signed up to ‘human rights’ declarations, so the Australian Government hoped it would be able to see off its fleets of taxpayer-funded lawyers who usually protested the country’s diversion of A/A intending immigrants to such hell-holes as Papua New Guinea, where their children might be paedophiled as the cost of their education.)

Scott Morrison (left), Australian Immigration Minister, and Sar Kheng (right), Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior, and other farts ooops diners, sign an agreement in Phnom Penh to relocate Oz’s aspirant ‘refugees’ (EPA) (Independent, 27 ix).

* The waiter has my sympathy. In my E.LU.-enforced days of waitering at Scottish castles and palaces, I sometimes had to rescue colleagues kept holding trays of twenty champagne flutes while dignitaries failed to show up on time. I only lost one flute (from a tray with which I had helped an exhausted Australian lass) – though, rather memorably, the flute crashed to the floor at the very moment when the dignitaries made their belated entrance. – Thankfully, both the somewhat obese wench and my ageing self were re-employed, our firm showing more compassion and common sense than Edinburgh University, which had taken £100K of taxpayer dosh to get rid of me for nothing more than the best free-speech and realistic messages which it had had broadcast for years.


Which would explode first? Multiculturalism or paedohysteria? Though the former was fully inflated and ready to burst in the Levant, the latter kept in the race as a multi-million-pound London persecution ooops prosecution of once-top-DJ David Lee Travis on 15 charges of hanky-panky produced only the mouse of a single conviction and 100%-suspended sentence for titty-groping (in the 1970s, of a once-female who had ‘endured’ DLT’s glaze-eyed fondling of her assets for a full 20 minutes).

Needless to say, DLT had suffered calamitous loss of reputation and a personal £2M in lawyers’ bills. But his sufferings might one day seem even more ridiculous to tabloid readers and attendant hacks and politicos than the millions of dead and displaced people in the Levant whose fate had been decided by the West failing to decide whether to back Solunnis or Shitites in Islam’s ethnic civil war


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Sunday, September 21, 2014


A veteran Conservative MP admitted that Enoch Powell had been right to warn against immigration in his controversial 1966 “rivers of blood” speech (D.Telegraph, 27 viii). Sir Gerald Howarth (67 and a pilot, financier and Thatcherite and former defence minister) said that the brilliant Tory MP – subsequently dumped by his party – had been correct in saying that the influx of immigrants of a “non-Christian” faith presented a “challenge” to British society.

In a letter to a constituent, Sir Gerald wrote that the 2014-exposed Trojan Horse plot in which Muslim extremists had attempted to take over schools in Birmingham highlighted the problems. He said: “Clearly, the arrival of so many people of a non-Christian faith has presented a challenge as so many of us, including the late Enoch Powell, warned decades ago.

Recent events have illustrated that some of these new arrivals have a very different ethos from traditional Christian schools and we were right to intervene to prevent them from teaching divisive ideology to children born here.”

Sir Gerald said that he stood by the letter and said his views had been reinforced by the child sex abuse scandal in Rotherham, where gangs of Pakistani men groomed and abused children (q.v.). He said that it was time for England to “fight back” against political correctness, adding: “If you don’t like it, go live somewhere else.

For 40 years we have been subjected to a left-wing political correctness which has stopped the British people from expressing perfectly legitimate and reasonable views. More than 1,400 children in Rochdale have paid the price for decades of political correctness and now people are speaking up.”

Howarth had questioned the conclusion of the Macpherson Report (into Black Stephen Lawrence's 1997 late-night death – probably in an argument over drugs) that the Metropolitan police were "institutionally racist" as "a grotesque over-reaction.”


The happy-clappy multiculturalism of loony British MSM and politicos went on display as ‘aid worker’ David Haines had his head cut off by Muslims of the IS Caliphate – after just three days of him arriving in Syria to ‘help’ the Arab Spring [the collapse of which [e.g. in strife-torn Libya] he knew nothing, his head already in the clouds....] against ‘monster’ London opthalmologist Basher Assad and his Vogue-covered wife and children.

Haines might have dimly expected retribution from a Britain which had superficially backed his ‘aid’ efforts for the fourth world [not just low-IQ, poor and lawless, but also fanatically violent in its superstitions and frank paranoia], but all he got was a ‘Cobra’ committee of suits meeting in Downing Street which decided not to unleash even one of Britain’s few remaining bombing aircraft.

{No wonder the Glasgow Irish had voted YES to independence of Westminster idiots – whose Eton-‘educated’ leader could not even explain to Americans what Magna Carta had been about! Yes, the ‘liberal,’ well-meaning, carin’ and sharin’ pacifist ‘anti-racist’ politicos of Westminster had managed to end up with England being hated and -- worse --  despised by not only America, Ireland, Spain and the Argentine but by the European Union, Russia, Iran and ISIL.

Their only consolation was that England’s worst traditional enemy, France, was in a comparable degree of chaos – with its brightest emigrating to London [making London the third city of France, as it was of Scotland] and its Présidente enjoying nothing but polygamy and its endless recriminations, with which only a true imperial Brit or an African tribal chieftain could cope.)
Further send-up of idealism was imminent as it turned out that the Eyesores had captured and were about to behead another White Brit, Alan Henning, who had made his way with supplies in an old ambulance through Turkey to Syria to help his Muslim pals – though himself a taxi-driver!


The race unrealism of England – which had spent its treasure, empire and a million lives in the twentieth century fighting its German cousins and giving away most of Ireland to the Celts – brought new hilarity as Irish-Catholic Glasgow was given, by London’s peecee-globalized politicos and media, the deciding vote in whether to break up the 307-year-old UK (from which Scotland’s Stewart kings had been ejected by Edinburgers for pretentious Frenchism, not to mention papism).

Not content with upsetting the world’s top anti-Islamicist, Vladimir Putin [compared to Hitler by Prince Charles – known merely as ‘Duke of Rothesay’ by the SNP] and with fawning on Black Muesli Peace Prize Nobelist Obarmy [who had made America the world’s far-and-away leading debtor], England’s political class of peecee maniacs handed a third of UK territory to the illiterate choice of non-central-Glaswegians who had for seven years shown their disaffection for Labour on top of their hatred for Tory Thatcherite England.

Like many English themselves, the wessies of Shcotland were fed up with the boring farts of London who were full of windy verbiage but did precisely nothing to imprison casino bankers, stop third-world immigration or raze mosques, so they understandably prepared to seize their moment.


 As campaigning in Scotland’s interminable, unnecessary and incompetent ‘referendum’ (about which Britain’s politicos had been too lazy to provide any details) was happily interrupted by the country anyhow voting 55% to stay in motherland UK, countless visual aids to the psychotic tendencies of ‘nationalists’ were provided even way outside the nutties’ non-English-speaking but English-subsidized homelands of non-central-Glasgow (D.Mail, 17 ix):

‘NO THANKS’ [to separation] adverts were overwritten with ‘SCUM’ defacements as quickly as they went up, ‘NO’ supporters had ‘COWARD’ scratched on their doors, bekilted upper class Highland Games funders and the upper-middle-classes of bijou Linlithgow reported intimidation, Borders farmers said they had been told their cattle would be let loose, and Hampstead-Jewish Labour leader Milliletre had found himself jostled into silence even in Edinburgh by burly foul-mouthed Scotnats.

A Better Together campaign team in East Ayrshire was confronted by YES supporters who told them if it was a NO vote they would be taken away and have their ‘faces smashed in’. They were told to hand over the details of those voting NO so their houses could be ‘burned down’.

Jayne Baxter, Labour MSP for Mid-Scotland and Fife, said she was called an ‘inbred Tory ****’, while a student who had been leafleting a tenement block in Edinburgh posted a photo on Twitter of him covered in egg. Graffiti that read ‘Vote Yes or Else’ were daubed on walls in Aberdeen.


 While the UK let its future be decided by a half-million Glasgow Irish, and US Pres.Obarmy insisted he was hors de combat with regard to Sharia fanatics, Australia’s Queensman PM Tony Abbottygoodgood got going socking it to the ill-chosen beneficiaries of his country’s Anti-White Oz Policy by arresting Muesloonytunes who had, as ISIL aficionadoes, ordered the beheading (and subsequent photographing) of passers-by on Sydney streets.

3K Muesmorons were promptly produced to demonstrate against Abbott’s fifteen arrests (made from an aboriginal tent in Northern Oz) – providing a visual aid to what the country’s peecee-crazed politicos had contrived. But at least Oz had a CofE bishop was prepared to speak out (Sydney Morning Herald, 18 ix):

The Anglican Dean of Sydney, Phillip Jensen, has written a provocative blog post titled 'The truth behind ISIL'.

He says it is "time to face the truth that Islam itself is in part to blame, and to help our fellow Australians, especially those from Islamic background, to understand that Islam is false".

"We must not try to [compare] Islam to Christian ideals of religion. Jesus and Mohammed were very different in their life as well as in their teaching. Jesus arrived in Jerusalem on a donkey to be executed, a week later, for our sins."

"Mohammed arrived at Mecca in front of an army of 10,000 soldiers to take the city by force. In countries where Christianity has dominated, mosques can be built, the Koran can be read and studied and preached in the streets, and citizens can change religion without fear of persecution, let alone execution. No corresponding freedom is granted to Christians in countries where Islam holds sway."

{This touching story of Christian pacificity rather drew a veil over the persecuted Christians having been taken over c.314AD by Emperor Constantine, who swiftly embarked on raiding the temples of rich Roman pagans to furnish the cash for building Constantinople. But it was true that the 1,200-year-later Protestant Reformation had indeed stripped away much superstition and allowed people to read the Bible for themselves and draw their own conclusions – a freedom leading to Darwinism, science, medicine and atheism, and certainly not available within their own religion to latter-day Mueslis.}


 After two years of crackpot peecee English politicos handing the future of the UK over to resident ‘Scots’ to decide, it mercifully turned out that Scotland did not have enough Irish Catholics to do the damage that UK PM Daft Dave and his ilk had madly invited and richly deserved: though the socialistified and welfare-dependent latter-day Celts around Glasgow (notably in the post-industrial dump of 45K-strong Coatbridge, where 30% actually had Irish surnames – their ancestors hailing from dirt-poor and doubtless low-IQ Donegal) and Dundee (which did not even have a Proddy fitba’ team) enthused themselves and bullied Unionists in their incomprehensible English, Scotland split decisively along its main ethnic faultline and voted 55% to keep the Union (61% in Edinburgh).

Enraged weegies awoke 19 ix to find they inhabited tiny (if over-populated) islets of stupidity quite surrounded by the cheerful Unionists of the Highlands, Islands, Stirling, Aberdeen, Saint Andrews, Edinb*gger and the Borders. Turnout had been 85% (90% in Unionist areas).

Whether Westminsterians could at last rally themselves to rid England of the influence of Greater Glasgow’s 40 gruesome Labour MPs (many of them flabby pasty-faced lesbians, if photos of ‘MSPs’ were anything to go by) on English affairs was the next question. (Needless to say, Scotland’s Irish had never got an MSM mention in the course of the referendum – any more than had England’s Pakistanis.)

    In the most dramatic day of Scotland’s history since the Battle of Flodden [see TgF, p.13], unionists got their first whiff of hope from a midnight YouGov internet poll (of 2,500) which estimated NO support at 54%. The first electoral result of the night was broadcast at 1.30am. In Alloa [near Stirling], the result came in for Clackmannanshire, otherwise known as “YES Country”, the area predicted to have the highest YES vote. Nationalists there had been so confident of victory that they had dubbed the polling booths “Aye pods”. Yet the NO vote had won convincingly, by 19,036 votes to 16,350, or 54 per cent to 46 per cent, exactly in line with YouGov’s prediction.

SNP MSP John Mason refused to accept the evidence, saying Clackmannanshire was “one of the smallest councils in Scotland so I think it’s quite hard to read very much into that”, as if the borough’s voters might have somehow voted NO by accident. The world’s stock markets did not agree: within moments of the Clackmannanshire result, the value of the pound rose sharply on currency exchanges whose traders were already convinced that unionism had won through. And First Minister Fish had re-directed his helicopter and jet from his ‘safe’ Aberdeen seat to Edinburgh, where he soon announced his (most honourable) resignation as top SNP apparatchik of illiterate bully-boys. As the full extent of the 55% NO victory sank in, unionists in Celtic-dominated Glasgow felt brave enough even to take on sobbing separatists in splendid George Square – where police used horses (well used to dealing with Clottish Caff vs Prod derbies) to achieve several arrests.


 The terminology of ‘race realism’ [coined in Edinburgh of 1996] got an outing in Sydney as the leader of a new nationalist party was allowed on TV for a supervised ding-dong with a Sudanese Black who had managed to get himself, his mother and eight siblings into the Workers’ Paradise (AmRen, 17 ix).

‘I am not a racist or bigot, just a race realist,’ insisted Nick Folkes, who himself had an Asian wife. A sociology professor, Andrew Jakubowicz, at a‘university of technology,’ was promptly produced to assert the usual peecee claptrap that there was only one ‘human race’ – if with “biological variants.”

But Folkes maintained – if without academic referencing – that Africans and Arabs had proved unable to contribute positively to ‘Anglo-Catholic Australian culture.’ Mr Folkes appeared alongside Sudanese-born Melbourne-resident Abraham Nouk in an episode of SBS’s latest show, Living With The Enemy:

One Neville Roach, patron of the Australian India Institute and former chairman of the Oz national Multicultural Advisory Council, told the programme that a race realist was ‘a thinly veiled twist on racism’ – neglecting that top race realists Art Jensen and Hans Eysenck had been of substantially Jewish descent [so presumably incapable of the dread ‘racist’ disease which Jews like Franz Boas (1858-1942) had themselves invented].


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, September 15, 2014


Not content with sabotaging Britain with comprehensive schools, third-world immigration, PeeCee, EUSSR, ECHR, unexplainable neo-bankruptcy (in fact due to ‘subprime lending’ and government-backed casino banking), non-policing, telephone abuse (unwanted calls, non-answering numbers), yag marriage, hour-long airport strip searches of pregnant women and children, and useless wars in which few Mueslis got killed by what was left of the country’s soldiery, Britain’s holidaying politicos proposed to bring the lethal Ebola virus in from Africa as soon as possible to finish the job.

A leading academic warned that university students could be at risk from the deadly Ebola virus – because 21,000 students from countries in the affected jungloid region from Sierra Leone to Nigeria were about to arrive in the UK (Sunday Mail, 7 ix).

Anthony Glees, the Professor of Politics at Buckingham University, called for West African students to be held in their home countries until they had been declared clear of Ebola and the 21-day incubation period had passed; but Westminster was pre-occupied with following the break-up of the UK which it had encouraged, and university VCs and their bloated management staff were determined to secure their obscenely fat salaries which depended on a steady supply of (over-optimistically) ‘aspirational’ low-IQ ‘students.’

A Mail correspondent wrote: “Con/Lab/Lib will let them in -- must keep the universities in clover. Fees will be paid by us in the form of a loan which will never be re-imbursed. Now they bring the threat of Ebola -- only a small risk, say the Unis; and our 3 Stooges [Lib, Lab, Con] do nowt as usual, words fail me!”


 Scots awoke shocked to find that their new poll support for separatism had knocked only 1% off London markets and the pound sterling. England was evidently quite resigned to, and even cheerful about its internationalist slave labour policy which recruited from Pakistan to Poland and did not require the socialism-addled products of Clotland’s non-grammar skules.

Yes, the 50-year-fashioned peecee-globalizing money-making Anglo-Saxon religion carried the serious risk that England would find itself in a state of permanent civil war between its Jews, Muslims, Hindoos etc, and without a friend around the Atlantic.

But demakrazy – having wiped out the powers of the monarch and replaced the lords with party hacks -- required only brief thinking ahead till the next election. Scotland could go its own welfarish way even if it did without PeeCee – at least as far as the English were concerned.

    Anyhow, whether bonnie Scotland would long preserve much unity beyond separation was doubtful. A Marxite Guardian columnist summed up the enthusiasm of the present: “On the ballot paper on 18 September, YES seems to read ‘Never live under a Tory government ever again!’” But an ‘independent’ Scotland – hypothetically retaining the Queen, the pound, Nato membership and EU membership – would still find itself divided along west-east (Catholic-Protestant, Glasgow-Edinburgh) and north-central-south (Gaelic-urban-charmingly rural) not to mention its own sponger vs elitist and flat-dwelling vs landowning lines that would prove quite as hard to master as the ethnic divides of England.


Fat bearded Muslim ‘British’ hate cleric Anjem Choudary, drawing benefit for his four children and an unknown number of wives, described the Islamic State as the sort of society he would 'love to live in' with his family, while insisting that he did not himself know the terrorist beheader of White American journalists, 'Jihadi John'. The murderous ‘radical activist’ said he admired the genocidsal makeshift ‘IS’ state set up by militants in Syria and Iraq, believed to be dragooning several million people.

However, the 47-year-old said that, while he viewed his British passport as nothing more than a travel pass, he would not move to Syria as he was born in Britain, and that if he were to try he would be arrested by British police. {For what? 100% of White taxpayers would be delighted to be shot of the traitor – if he could not be hung, drawn and agonisingly quartered.} 'From what I understand from people living there, they have security, schools are now being set up where their children are taught about Islam, and they have the basic needs of food, clothing and shelter,' ChowFarty told the multicult-loving Observer newspaper.


 Faced with noisy Irish-Glaswegian enthusiasm for ‘Scottish independence’ (i.e. for giving Etonian Tories and Jewish-led Labourites a good kicking) and with having to explain to themselves and the Queen how they had been unable to preserve the UK – even when Labour got 40 Westminster seats from it – Britain’s politicos came up with their daftest-ever plan: to give the Scottish ‘parliament’ (of fat lesbian frumps – these kind of wymmin having time for politics) full tax-raising powers to fleece its fellow Jocks and thus provide all the socialism/compassion that Glaswegians could want.

Hang about! Scotland to pay for Scottish welfare? That was England’s job! London’s all-party-backed wheeze of buying off ‘independence’ sentiment by issuing the Scots with self-taxing responsibilities would prove an entirely damp squib – except in so far as Scotland would know it was kicking at an open door, an exercise at which First Minister Fish had already proved himself adept, having for seven years declined to use Scotland’s already-existent income-tax-raising powers and instead taken the money (for free university places, subsidized old folks, prescription charge exemptions, useless Edinburgh trams etc) directly from London.

{The failure of the multicult-addled English to tell Glaswegians where to get off was, of course, par for the course: England had spent the previous century losing India, Africa, Ireland, its church, its law-making, its grammar schools, its counties and its high streets. Now, to save face, its hopeless parties -- which no-one any longer joined (unless bullied by trade unions) -- thought they could bribe Scots with their own money.

The Scots were unlikely to be impressed. As HM Queen sent her dreary peecee Westminster party leaders [Daft Dave, Milliletre and Cleggover] up to Edinburgh to make propaganda, the SNP’s Mr Fish quipped that he would gladly pay their bus fare.}


 The complete inability of Black Africans to run a modern country was exposed as the Ebola virus tore through Liberia – a state created with American largesse to repatriate slaves, though most Blacks had been wise enough not to return to their ghastly motherland. Ebola was spreading fast in Liberia, where many thousands of new cases were expected over the coming three weeks, the World Health Organisation said (Guardian, 9 ix). "Transmission of the Ebola virus in Liberia is already intense and the number of new cases is increasing exponentially," the WHO said.

The organisation noted that motorbikes and regular taxis were "a hot source of potential virus transmission" because they were not disinfected in Liberia, where conventional Ebola control measures were “not having an adequate impact". The UN agency said aid partners {i.e. Western dummies ooops donors} ‘needed’ to scale up efforts against Ebola by three to four times in Liberia and elsewhere in west African countries battling the epidemic.

In Liberia, the disease had killed 1,089 people out of 1,871 cases – the highest national toll, the WHO said. Across Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, a total of 2,097 had died out of 3,944 cases. Inevitably, Black extremists could be found blaming the creation and spread of Ebola on the US Department of Defense....


 Nature (8 ix) provided a full account of C21 work on the genetics of IQ, race, violence and sexuality – by such scholars as Christopher Chabris, Stephen Hsu, Bruce Lahn and Robert Plomin.

 There was much cautious pussy-footing around the ‘sensitivities’ of fanatically dysgenic colleagues who wanted to get on identifying and ‘helping’ foetuses having monstrous genetic problems that could, if preserved, fuel ‘health service’ job creation for generations ahead; but there was no immediate cause for anxiety about eugenics since even IQ had turned out to be rather more polygenic than even the London School had estimated – with no single gene contributing more than a third of an IQ point and with research being likely to require a million subjects before a passably full list of genes for the variation could be provided with scientific authority.

Apparently the strict ‘narrow’ heritability of IQ was reckoned to be about 0.50 – as long estimated by Cyril Burt and in The g Factor – although the ‘broad’ heritability (including G x E interactions and G,E covariance) would be higher. {At least the leisurely pace of advance ensured the researchers would keep their jobs....}


  The state to which English politicos and their lawyer co-traitors had reduced England was dramatically demonstrated as railway staff refused to help an old lady who had fallen down an escalator because they had not been ‘trained’ in elfin safety.

When an elderly woman fell down an escalator at bustling Leeds train station, one might have expected rail staff to rush to her aid. But astonishingly, they refused to help her. And their reason? They had not been trained in ‘people-handling’. The extraordinary excuse was given by Northern Rail workers, who stood just yards away and shamefully let passengers instead tend to the shocked woman (D.Mail, 10 ix).


 The subject of IQ got an unaccustomed mention in MSM as correspondent Kenneth Hynes (of London, N7) was allowed to say (Daily Telegraph, 10 ix):

....A repeated IQ test for all pupils throughout their school careers would allow us to compare actual [exam] results with reasonably expected results and provide a good objective measure of the value added by individual teachers as well as schools.

{Naturally, the need to provide and respond to such value-added educational results had been repeatedly stressed in The g Factor (1996) – pp. 94, 159, 181.}


 Even as Barry Hussein Obarmy told Americans (10 ix) that he would start bombing ISIL fanatics in Iraq and Syria (whom he was already droning), he took the multiculti trouble to insist he would not be bombing Muslims. “Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not Islamic,” Obama said, speaking from the state floor of the White House residence. “No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.”

{How convenient – sparing the President from having to say he planned to go through the motions of defending Christians, Jews, Shitites and Yazids from mass-murdering Sunnis! But fancy Obarmy not knowing that ‘IS’ stood for ‘Islamic State’ and that 100% of its aficionados were Muslim.}


After two decades of unfailing support for PeeCee, the BBC found itself confronted by a Manchester police officer who (under conditions of strict anonymity, his ten-minute statement being read by another – R4, 12 ix, 13:30) was prepared (once) to mention the dread word ‘Pakistani’ when referring referring to the abducters, molesters, pimps, traffickers and rapists of White weenies in Rotherham.

The officer was quite clear that the young ‘scrubbers’ [as cops called them] were given low priority by police, whose politically supplied ‘target’ of ‘community cohesion’ was of far greater importance than arresting Pak taxidrivers, kebab-restauranteurs and grocers who were, after all, giving weenies a better time (with even pretences of love) than the gals {victims of socialist championing of fatherlessness} got in children’s homes {run by brain-addled ‘social workers’}.

Asked about the lately accepted press estimate that 1,400 young slags had been involved around the Manchester-Bradford-Sheffield triangle, the cop reckoned this a massive underestimate – he thought Rotherham and Rochdale alone had one new reported case to consider (and dismiss) every day, with abuse continuing at full steam right up to the present despite occasional convictions.

{Such was Britoid multiculturalism. Watch out, America and Australia – it’s coming your way!}

{These revelations of irrepressible Pak libido came as Pak-trained ‘respected neurosurgeon’ Nafees Hamid, 50, went on trial for fourteen incidents of impromptu unzipping, lewd remarks, lascivious groping, simulated sex and asking for completely irrelevant demonstration of masturbatory techniques while assessing female patients for brain damage at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital c.2012 – D.Mail, 12 ix. By 2014, most British cases of sex abuse by doctors, as adjudicated by the General Medical Council, involved Pakistanis or Arabs.}


 As Scotland approached the Sep.18 referendum on separating from England that had been weirdly arranged for it by Britain’s main political parties, it could be said that no racial issue was involved: for the racial/ethnic divide of the British Isles (Celtic/Catholic vs Anglo-Saxon Protestant) ran principally from west to east, not from north to south. But this would be superficial in two ways.

First, the momentum of the Scotnat campaign came from the SNP having managed by socialist promises to seize 30% of Labour’s traditional Irish-Catholic vote in Glasgow, thus pitting Scotland’s west (and north) in a pretty fair fight with the country’s east (and south).

Second, momentum was maintained, when not by frank racial hostility to ’the English’, then by hostility to ‘Team Westminster’ which had already done so much damage to Britain (not least by mass third-world immigration) as to render the 307-year-old nation a far less attractive entity to which to belong than it had been in the days of Empire (which had supplied so many Scots with jobs).

The SNP had even compared the Scots’ ‘predicament’ to that of South Africa’s Blacks under apartheid. This obviously showed woeful ignorance of the rigours of apartheid; but there was something refreshing about no-holds-barred, PeeCee-disrespecting, nationalist opposition to the ludicrous conventional multicult politics which had brought Britain economic downfall (for the third time since 1945 under Labour) and only a dysgenic prospect of UK-backed casino banking for the long-term future. Every cloud has a silver lining....

    Amusingly, Scotnats in south Edinburgh came up with a slogan that voters should “Follow the Pied Piper of Niddrie on the short march to freedom” – evidently unaware that the Pied Piper of Hamelin had let his hundreds of child followers to perdition.


Unable to admit it was at war with (and indeed had already been invaded by) Islam and kindred low-IQ and superstitious desperadoes, Europe – no longer united against Communism or enjoying the backing of a White America (which had itself twice elected a leftist Black Muslim Kenyan pacifist booby ‘President’ in the hope of thus solving its own homegrown racial problems) – was on the brink of break-up.

A week before Scotland voted on whether to break away from the United Kingdom, Catalan separatists in north-eastern Spain hoped at least 1 million people would take to the streets in Barcelona and across Catalonia to demand a secession vote. The central government in Madrid insisted that would be illegal.

Several hours before protests began, Catalonia regional leader Artur Mas said his government was not wavering from plans to hold a secession referendum on Nov.9, even though experts said an attempt was sure to be blocked Spain's Constitutional Court.

Polls suggesting Scotland's "Yes" independence camp could win their Sep.18 vote had energized Catalan separatists, Corsicans who wanted to break away from France and Flemish speakers in Belgium demanding more autonomy, independence or union with the Netherlands.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, September 08, 2014


Following national outrage about the unprosecuted sexual abuse of ‘White-trash’ weenies in Rochdale and Rotherham (q.v.), UK cops announced they would soon be charging hundreds of men, mainly of Pakistani origin, with a bumper crop of violations of youngsters, not uncommonly including grooming, drugging, pimping, petrol-dousing, rape and gang rape (Sunday Mail, 31 viii). Alleged perpetrators lived in “many areas” (insisted Britain’s mealy-mouthed peecee politicos), but especially in and around Manchester.

    The Rotherham scandal had led three Labour MPs and the Chief Crown Prosecutor for Northwest England (himself with a mid-Eastern name, though born in Birmingham) to express discontent that multiculturalism had gone too far and that even they themselves – pillars of the multicult community – had been made to fear accusations of racism when they exposed Pak proclivities (Sunday Telegraph, 31 viii). Sex rackets involving weenies had apparently increased greatly in the previous fifteen years {perhaps as young sex-starved Paks came to realize the chance that Whitey’s peecee tyranny was giving them}.

    Britain’s first Muslim peer, Lord Ahmed, was moved to admit he himself had been shocked when he arrived in Rotherham from Kashmir in the 1980s and quickly discovered extensive sexual abuse perpetrated by his kinsmen. He wrote for the Mail (1 ix):

"...Many mosques have no idea how to lead or guide young men struggling to come to terms with being a Muslim in a modern country. These men {well, teenagers} need help with issues such as sex education, teenage pregnancy, drink and drugs – all the things other young people have to cope with. But they are taboo in most mosques. If a British-Pakistani boy tried to talk to an imam about it, he would look at him blankly.

    Many mosques are dangerously cut off from the rest of society, rooted in the ancient world, not the modern one. This approach is reflected by the way imams behave. Many rarely mix with other faiths, which is wrong. They should be encouraged to visit other places of worship to break down barriers between faiths and learn how others tackle these problems.This inward-looking view is mirrored by the proliferation of satellite TV stations, on which rival British-based Sunni and Shia imams attack each other."

    In the Guardian (1 ix), the chairwoman of a national child protection charity claimed there were “huge numbers” of sex gang victims by the 1990s and that a 2002 research by the UK Home Office had been "effectively suppressed" according to Professorette Alexis Jay who wrote the new report into events in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013.

    By 2 ix (Guardian), South Yorkshire police (headed by an evasive wimp called Crompton, himself reduced to pulp by a televised Parliamentary Committee, 2 ix) graciously agreed to discussions about whether to appoint ooops find lackeys from another force who could discuss whether to discuss and appoint ‘entirely independent’ peeceeified goons who might gently investigate Rotherham’s criminal anti-racism ooops community cohesion programme....;

and Esau Milliletre’s London Labour Party suspended, pending dinners ooops inquiries, four members (three of them longstanding Rotherham councillors, two of them with Pak-style names). These moves followed a BBC Panorama documentary screened on Monday night in which the Home Office official who had investigated the sexual exploitation of children in Rotherham accused the council of being involved in the unauthorised removal of information from her office.

Her report in 2002 had suggested there were even then more than 270 victims of the scandal, which was finally exposed with revelations that at least 1,400 children were abused (q.v.). She told Panorama she had sent her report to both the Rotherham council and the Home Office on a Friday, but when she returned on Monday she found her office had been raided. "They'd gained access to the office and taken my data, so out of a number of filing cabinets there was just one drawer emptied and it was emptied of my data. It had to be an employee of the council," she said.

The Home Office researcher, who was not named by Panorama, also said she had been accused of being insensitive when she told one official that most of the perpetrators were from Rotherham's Pakistani community. A female colleague talked to her about the incident. "She said you must never refer to that again – you must never refer to Asian men," the HORU researcher said.

    {Just why no mosque was closed (or razed) per each Muesli atrocity was a mystery – except in so far as PM Daft Dave was busy – as he burbled to Parliament -- arranging (yet further) discussions of discussions about how to protect the ‘uman rights of beastly fanatics who used Britain as their base for beheading Yazidis, Christians and Shitites of Mesopotamia, not to mention for enjoying Rotherham’s weenie sluts. In such circumstances of Muesli invasion and ‘liberal’ collapse, Brits of parliamentary persuasion – suppressed over 50 years by Labour’s steady erosion of free speech -- could only punish their politicos by blogging away and voting UKIP.}


 A new step in the stupidifying ooops multiracializing of Europe took place as a multi-millionaire husband-and-wife team in Malta had a 140-foot ship (‘Phoenix 1’) converted (with two inflatable fast boats and two helicopter drones armed with the latest imaging technology) for lifting hundreds of would-be-migrants Africans per trip out of the Mediterranean (apparently at the behest of the Pope) and handing them to the Italian navy (D.Mail, 1 ix) – which would wave them on to France where they would join the 2K ‘refugees’ (etc), some of them knife-wielding, waiting in Calais to intimidate a lorry driver to take them to the British welfare utopia of which they dreamed, unless they could perchance rise higher as fruit pickers, servants to Guardian readers, taxi drivers coping with Britain’s late-night drinkers with only blowjobs as an occasional reward, or border control agents appointed under equal opportunity legislation.

{Not that the British welfare state would last long: if Scottish residents voted YES for separation, England would end up at last in anti-welfare hands and Scotland would never afford the welfare that it promised itself; and if Scots punters voted NO, much of the UK welfare budget would have to be transferred into policing to damp down Scotnat outrage. But employers – whether English or Scottish -- would lap up the slave labour in a country which had destroyed the education of 90% of its own young by socialism and been so arranged by its politicos as not to have anyone – apart from perhaps the Royals – who thought more than two years ahead.}


Australia’s Queensman PM, Tony Abbott, announced that “extreme force” was legitimate against the ISIS/ISIL/IS loons of Syria/Iraq and sent an aircraft to parachute machine guns, grenades and rocket launchers to the Turds of northern Iraq (Guardian, 2 ix) – rather than wait for Nato-member Turkey (which had the largest army in Europe) and fantastically USA-armed Saudi, Qatar and Kuwait to take up their own responsibilities to control the madder Sunnis.

{It was good to see youthful Oz impetuosity activated, even if Oz had no idea as to how to control its own Mueslis, imported under its latter-day Non-White immigration policy.}


With the West’s knicker-twisted multicult politicos having failed to squash even simple-minded misogynistic Islam (which chiefly offered its boys obedient wives and 72 virgins for the after-life), and in particular having wasted blood and treasure in a decade of non-warfare in Afghooniland (where, by 2014, no American dared venture outside the country’s few ‘cities’) and Eyeraq (scheduled for a decade of terrifying Solunni vs Shitite civil war), having its economy teeter on the brink of another non-understood crash, and having poked the Russian bear, Western electorates turned increasingly to NONE OF THE ABOVE, prepared to give UKIP a chance in England, the FN a chance in France, ‘Alternative Deutschland’ a chance in Germany and the SNP a chance on even more independence for welfare-dependent but all-White-and-higher-IQ-Asian Scotland (independence opposed by all of England’s four top political parties and by 90% of Scottish big businesses).

Was there something to be said for democracy after all? Not perhaps in heartland USA, where Pres. Barry played golf while Detroit cut off its own water supplies, where Whites were in trouble whenever they shot a Black, and Hispanics upped their 30-year invasion of the south-west (now landing on the beaches of San Diego); for White Americans would long hope for a ‘federal’ solution of apartheid if only they could think how to do it (even Harvard had a hundred-strong ‘Federal Society’).

But crowded Europe did not have that option, so could only turn in fury on the peecee artistes who had flooded it (not Scotland, thank heavens, for the Glasgow Irish had done sterling work repelling gypsies and other third-worlders sent up from London) with riff-raff and continued to increase the supply across the Mediterranean – having mindlessly overthrown Libya’s Col. Gadawfu who had helped brake the flow.

Slowly (far too slowly), but fairly surely, Westerners were learning to say NO to the globalizing loons who had assumed control of the EUSSR, USA, UN, IMF, ECHR, NATO and UK – but not of Western people.


 French cops’ machine guns were on prominent display as the gendarmerie nobly defended welfare-state Britain from invasion by hundreds of Araboid ‘refugees’ – just a fraction of the thousands encamped around Calais (in squalid squats spreading to the Belgian border) who regarded Britain as El Dorado. Not that the Araboids payed any attention to PeeCee-addled cops, for they knew Europe’s politicos would not allow them to be shot – so they had to be fire-hosed instead as they broke through gates and rushed a ramp to commandeer a ferry that would take them to heaven in Dover (D.Mail, 4 ix).

Who would pay for the fun-and-games? Well, the Mayor of Calais was understandably insistent that British taxpayers fork out for the inconvenience to her townsfolk of Brits making their country a magnet for the wretched of the earth. But British politicos (though briefly returned to Westminster from their six-month-per-year holiday) agreed to feign complete indifference to the mess which their socialist stupidity and conservative compassion were making.


 As the UK Parliament and Nato met briefly for dining and drinking and saying how they would like to ‘do something’ about Eyesore beheadings in the Levant and Puto’s rapid advance through the settlements of south-east Ukraine which that country’s Kiev government had smashed up through random shelling, a fine summary of the useless West’s self-inflicted predicament was provided at ‘living in a madhouse’ – though sparing discussion of the stream of Araboid ‘refugees’ flooding in across the Mediterranean (with papal, Italian and French tolerance seeing them through to Calais, where they took knives to the throats of drivers headed for Dover), of the West having rendered 20% of its White young unemployable (despite their ‘degrees’), and of the continued hyperbreeding of illiterate and superstitious Ebola-spreading Africans.

Apparently, no less than 26% of 3M Britain-resident Mueslis freely declared they had no loyalty to Britain – making them a more unconscionable problem than ever was the 1M ‘Irish community’, with whose tiny 1K-strong IRA wing the wretched White traitors of the UK had had to declare a score draw after eighty years of bombing, maiming and killing (little of it by UK authorities).

    Mercifully, Puto solved the West’s problem of commitment to a diverse Ukraine by persuading Kiev dictator Porridgenko to sign a 7-point peace plan which Puto had itemised on a fag packet – though the deal, in which Puto denied designs on Odessa, scuppered the Nato shindig in Cardiff which was still blustering about more sanctions on Russia and a “multinational rapid reaction spearhead force” (4K squaddies to face Russia’s 400K, to be ready for ‘rapid’ action by the end of 2015!...) even as Porridgenko announced his capitulation.


 The lordliness of Britain’s multi-millionaire multi-culti class of politicos went on display as PM Daft Dave Cameron said that he would “emphatically” not resign if Scotland voted to leave the United Kingdom. The UK Prime Minister mouthed it would “break my heart” if Scotland were to vote “Yes” in the Sep.18  poll, but insisted his job would not be under threat. His astonishing play-acting came as polls showed that Alex Salmond’s SNP’s separatist “Yes” campaign had closed the gap with just twelve days to go before the Clottish referendum.

{Perhaps there was something to be said for an Eton education after all: one might not know what Magna Carta is, but ‘broken-heartedly’ clinging on to power was second nature – albeit prosaically assisted by Labour incompetence in losing forty of its 300 Westminster MPs by no longer (since 2007, when Rev Bliar gave way to Grumpy Prod Gordon and Jewish Milliletre) having the Catholic leadership that was required by the Glasgow Irish.}


Britain’s best-known charity for boosting Black hyper-breeding, Oxfam, was told to keep its nose out of politics and ‘concentrate on its knitting’ – by a surprisingly robust new government appointee, Brooks Walmart (D.Mail, 5 ix). In his first major speech since his appointment, as ‘minister for civil society’ (as a token male to balance PM DD’s fat lesbian frumps and witches), Mr Newmart managed to say (before being hauled off by DD’s Obersturmfuehrerines): “We really want to try and keep charities and voluntary groups out of the realms of politics.”

Nearly half of previous Labour PM Gordon Brown’s Downing Street aides had been discovered to have gone on to ‘work’ for charities and think-tanks – positions from which they continued guerrilla war on the Tories and all British realists and patriots. Eleven out of the 25 ‘special advisers’ who had worked for Mr Brown when he was prime minister in 2009 had taken roles at various ‘charitable’ organisations which critics claimed were being used as vehicles for a shameless pro-Labour multicult agenda, designed to help destroy what remained of Western civilization.

 Charities had been previously banned by law in England from giving support or funding to political parties; but in 2008 Mr Brown (who felt guilty about going to E.LU. precociously at age 16 – a product of sensible streaming) tweaked the rules so they could join political campaigns and spread the socialist-egalitarian message. At another ginormous ‘charity,’ Save the Children's CEO earned $387,000 in 2012 that didn't include pension payments and perks. Every single penny of that package would have come out of donations which naἵve punters thought would be directly helping to pay for food, clean water or schooling for an ‘underprivileged’ child which had been born thanks to papal (and Muslim) interdiction of contraception and kept alive by Western medicine.


Headhunters (2014; q.v.) provided an admirable and amusing account of the early (1898) anthropological/psychological Cambridge effort in New Guinea and surrounds; and it reasonably stressed at once the ‘arrogance’, intelligence and romanticism of the star expeditionary, the Anglo-Scottish William McDougall (‘Mighty Mac’), who would go on to become Britain’s top psychologist of the 20th century (with the Chair of Psychology at Harvard to his name for five years, till he fell out with the rising behaviourists who scorned his interests in instincts, inheritance, the subconscious and parapsychology).

McD himself, though forever falling out with the dry-and-dusty nitpickers of Cambridge, the near-relativist idealist philosophers of Oxford, and the Harvard girls who wanted to believe that behaviourism could yield them a perfect child, went on to sustain a dynamic psychology which, though he himself became academically neglected, would re-surface in the Nobel-winning instinct doctrines of Lorenz, Tinbergen and von Frisch, in the nativism of Chomsky, and in the evolutionary psychology of the likes of Richard Dawkins.


 As Bonnie Clotland floundered in its anti-Thatcherism (though Thatch had rescued Scotland’s ratepayers from Labour depredations and kept the Clyde as Europe’s main nuclear bulwark against 1980 Communism), fine pieces by TgF-backing Sean Thomas and Nato- (if also RC- and mysticism-) backing Roger Scruton rightly deplored the revealed uselessness of the British left to marshall its own Glaswegian Irish Catholic supporters of a century -- said supporters (of whom a third planned to vote YES to separation) detecting that the left and its peecee goons had already kicked the heart out of British freedom and that the Scots might as well go it alone (before the tidal wave of ‘British’ Blacks and Muslims arrived).

Whether Scotland itself (with its vast east-west and north-south divisions) was a nation was unclear; but its punters saw that Britain itself had failed in repeatedly surrendering to EUSSR, ECHR, Green non-energy, a modern much-dining Nato which proposed to take on Russia with 3K troops and the Mesopotamian Caliphate with an occasional drone, and above all to PeeCee infection which allowed no Anglo-Saxon pride or freedom.


The goons of invasion-inviting peecee England got their result as a popular 82-yr great-grandmother (of 1945 Italian origin) was beheaded while reading quietly in her London garden by a 25-yr jobless druggie Black Muslim convert called ‘Fat Nick’ (who had just previously been videoed failing to pay for a quarter-pound-burger and then beheading a few flowers and two cats) (D.Mail, 6 ix).

Splendid job creation was provided for plastic-coated English ‘police’ as they smashed doors and windows around Edmonton to facilitate ‘escape’ from the crazed killer; and no less than ten fuzz were eventually deemed necessary in a magistrate’s court to control the animal – at a time when English police forces were declining to investigate burglaries, instead insisting the burgled householders do their own Columbo-style sleuthing.

{Anything rather than turn the BM nutcase over to a Select Parliamentary Committee of Labour multicults and watch the resultant publicity for Islam! Yes, England had ruined itself by hyper-‘polite’ PeeCee – a disease from which the Glasgow Irish did not suffer.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.