Monday, January 26, 2015


France’s Marine Le Pen was given some media coverage of her views as she prepared to debate (and doubtless get howled down) at the Oxford Union on February 6th (Mail on Sunday, 18 i). Happily, her ideas on the Muesli question were not entirely dissimilar from those advanced in ‘IQ & PC.’

She wanted to abandon the Schengen Agreement, which mandated free movement of self-proclaimed ‘workers’ across Europe’s internal borders – though she seemed to have no proposal for towing ships of A/A would-be migrants back across the Mediterranean.

She wanted mosques constantly supervised – though how this would improve on MI5’s efforts or a policy of closing one mosque per each Muesli murder was unclear. And, most imaginatively of all, imitating Russian policy, she wanted to reintroduce conscription – though how she would get such a policy to bite especially on non-taxpaying Blecks, Peks and Mueslis was not specified.

Still, altogether a not unpromising start, at least as compared with the non-proposals of Europe’s political class.

    Meantime, as Russia had to deal with new ferocious fighting in Solunni Chechnya (killing a score), it reminded the West of another alternative as it razed the homes of some fifteen families believed to have links to the Muesli troublemakers.


 Israeli PM Benjamin Notanyahoo became the first Western leader to admit that Europe was being hit by “a wave of Islamisation.” In response, he said Israel would aim to reduce its dependence on trade with Europe and instead seek to expand contacts with Asia – in token of which he welcomed a 100-strong trade delegation from Japan (D. Telegraph, 18 i).

    In Britain, former Chief Rabbi Lord Sachs was prepared to tell the BBC (R4, 19 i, 08:10) that the mounting anti-Semitism that was putting fear into British Jews was due to “radicalised Islamists” – a rare public admission that Islam had anything to do with anything, though he quickly went on to add the usual piety that such “radicalized Islamists” were only a “tiny minority.”


After thirteen years of the West seeking multiculti harmony in Iraq, and eight recent months of dropping 17K of ordinance to stop Solunnis advancing into Baghdad, Iraq’s vice-president Iyad Allawi (a Shitite who subscribed to Western lunacy) said (Guardian, 19 i) “There is widespread ethnic cleansing there, militias are roaming the areas. Scores and scores of people ... have been expelled from their areas and they can’t go back because of the dominance of the militias.”

A senior Iraqi official, Dr Hisham al-Hashimi, who advised the government on Isis, agreed. “The areas around Baghdad are suffering from a lot of sectarian violence and the tribes there have started to reflect on the idea of joining Isis. The tribes believe that there are moves to deport them from their lands.”

Samarra to the north of the Iraqi capital and Solunni areas just to the south remained tense and dangerous, despite more than seven months of air strikes that had supported the embattled Iraqi military and the large number of Shitite militias that fought alongside it.

A Guardian correspondent added: “In the long term the Sunni areas of Iraq will become independent, alongside Kurdistan and the Shia. Building an artificial nation state made up of these ingredients is a recipe that has failed many times before. Chef Iyad Allawi may cook up a storm in his restaurant with the nation building menu, but he'll end up with egg on his face, unsatisfied customers and a messy clean-up.”


As a thousand mosques and related groups received a completely courteous letter from Westminster’s outsize ‘Community Secretary’ Eric Pickles and a Muesli pal, Lord Ahmad, asking them to help counter radicalization (a plea doubtless made hundreds of times over the previous generation and usually followed swiftly by government handouts), their leadership decided to go into caterwauling mode: ‘Why are we being treated as having some special problem? What comparable requests were being made of churches, temples, synagogues etc?’

Muslim Brotherhood secretaryperson Ibrahim Bogbrush needed only to reply politely assuring HMG of co-operation and asking what precise action was expected to have the gigantic Pickles’ knickers in a twist – for Westminster had no idea what to do about the Muesli problem except to ignore it as much as possible while issuing occasional anodyne reports and letters to provide a semblance of activity to handle the invasion which it had traitorously allowed. Instead, Bogbrush catapulted imams (many of them doddery) into a confrontation which HMG had certainly not sought.


As the mayoress of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, announced she would sue America’s Fox News for saying her city had ‘no-go’ areas dominated by Mueslis (six banlieus were named by Fox), a Guardian correspondent observed (21 i):

"I've heard of 'Gallic hubris' but this woman flies in the face of obvious truth.

Across France large swathes of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered “no-go” zones by French police. In English we refer to these areas simply as “no-go zones” but with more finesse the French refer to them as Zones Urbaines Sensibles. Same thing, two different languages.

At the last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones (Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on French government websites, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control.

I don't see how this woman's exagerated outrage is likely to solve what is fast becoming a religio/cultural civil war in her country."


Legislators in China’s far-western Xinjiang province passed a law to prohibit residents from wearing burqas in public, state media reported, in a continued campaign against what authorities view as religious extremism (CNN, 14 i).The new ban in local capital Urumqi was approved by local legislators in December, and given the green light by the regional legislature at the weekend.

     A spate of recent violent incidents had rocked Xinjiang, a resource-rich region long inhabited by the Turkic-speaking, largely Muslim Uyghurs. The arrival of waves of Han Chinese, the country’s predominant ethnic group, over the past decades had fuelled ethnic tensions. Chinese officials blamed the recent attacks on Uyghur separatists -- whom they also labelled “religious extremists” -- seeking to establish an independent state.


 As Boris Johnson’s paean to ‘the Greatest Briton,’ Sir Winston Churchill, makes clear, WSC was a magnificently rounded and inspiring personality. As The Churchill Factor goes through WSC’s achievements in the military, politics, journalism, world leadership, love and painting, no modern psychometrician would doubt he was intelligent (g+), independent-minded / determined /wilful (w+), lively / good-humoured (e+), conscientious /careful (c+), and affectionate / sympathetic (a+), all topped off by emotionality / neuroticism (n+) (which likely accounted for his jumbo-sized memory and constant drinking) and with the greatest capacity for repartee.

(When one woman tried jesting with him – with regard to his ‘militaristic’ views that, were he her husband, she would put poison in his coffee, WSC promptly replied “Madam, if I were your husband I would drink it.”)

Understandably, BoJo specially emphasizes WSC’s bravery (w+) which was prominent from an early age as WSC – a small, skinny, lisping, ginger-haired boy – laboured to impress schoolmates who dismissed him as feeble (he took up dumb bells and became his primary school’s champion fencer) and to win the slightest approving attention from his disdainful father.

Fortunately, things came together quite quickly for Churchill. Diverted to Sandhurst instead of university (he had probably been somewhat dyslexic), he flourished as a cavalryman and embedded journalist, became famous for his dashing exploits and, when he married Clementine Hozier in 1908, when he was 34, was treated to adoring London crowds usually reserved for royalty. By that time, the a+ side of WSC was also being given a run for its money for WSC (who called himself a Tory Democrat, like his father) had joined the Liberals to fight for free trade, pensions, strikes and tea breaks. An intimate of Liberal grandee Lloyd George, WSC had the world at his feet.

    Churchill’s courage was to be sorely tried. Major military expeditions failed (Dardanelles, 1915; Narvik, 1940; Battle of France, 1940 – from which 600K British troops were only saved by what BoJo agrees with others was Hitler’s “mistake” in thinking his own armies overstretched. By 1942, Britain had plainly failed to rescue Poland (the original point of the UK’s declaration of war), had lost Singapore (and the great ships ‘Prince of Wales’ and ‘Repulse’) and was having a hard time even against Mussolini; Churchill had to endure Stalin waving his pipe and asking when WSC would start fighting.

Even Churchill’s diplomatic initiatives had not paid off: Russia and America had been brought into WWII not due to WSC’s assiduous efforts but thanks to the folly of Hitler and Hirohito in attacking them. And by 1945 Britain was well en route to losing India which Churchill had wanted saved from the detested Gandhi (whom WSC said he wished to see trampled by bull elephants); and had acquired vast debts to America (for what BoJo calls “bathtub” ships) that they were not paid off till the last £50M instalment in 2005.

    It is true that Churchill had a passable line in tough-minded ‘racist’ bluster, being unafraid to call himself a patriotic White and Aryan who stood for “race and nation” and did not want to see “Hottentot” immigration; but his main vision for post-1945 was of an internationalist world – albeit one in which Britain would play a leading role, especially in Europe (which Labour coalminers and steelworkers prevented him joining since they did not want to be run from Brussels); and he gave no thought to how to limit immigration from Pakistani Muslims or Caribbean Blacks (who all had ‘rights’ to come to the motherland) any more than he had to making peace with Hitler (arranging a proper German imperium in eastern Europe in return for British domination of the high seas) after his let-off at Dunkirk and salvation by Polish pilots in the Battle of Britain.

All this was perfectly understandable; but tough-minded realists do not normally expect understanding. Certainly Brits of 1945 gave him little, chiefly because of his mad fantasy of getting US dollars to fund the ex-Wehrmacht in a new attack on Russia (when The Americans were happy enough to get Paris, Rome, Berlin and Tokyo and had no desire to risk the fate of Napoleon and Hitler by quibbling with Uncle Joe): even while cheering for Winnie, they threw him out of office unceremoniously.

    Mercifully, WSC’s legend of defending freedom (that famous V-sign came from the Dutch Vreiheit) was passably intact, not least because it suited the left to applaud the UK co-operating with ‘anti-Nazi’ Communist Russia. But even as he died in January, 1965, with eastern Europe well and truly under the Communist jackboot, the rats were gnawing at the bottom drawer, planning restrictions on free speech which would first be implemented under the Race Relations Act of 1966, a foretaste of the full-blown tyranny of PeeCee which would engulf the West by 2015, making all realistic discussion of differences in IQ, race, sex, sexual orientation and handicap an impossibility.

Churchill would rightly have smiled and rightly had another drink, for he knew he had “achieved so much to achieve so little.” As Enoch Powell – kicked out by the Tories for insufficient multiculturalism – was to put it: “All political careers end in failure.” And this was doubtless specially true when key knowledge sources were avoided (perhaps out of the earliest political correctness, insisted on by Lenin c.1920 to help manage Russia’s sprawling empire): WSC was an enthusiast for science (half-inventing the tank and the seaplane) and Enoch surely knew of Muslim proclivities for cousin marriage, but neither man ever clapped eyes on an IQ test, so their ability to be tough-mindedly realistic about the future was limited.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Tuesday, January 20, 2015


As Paris paraded the mantras of Western leaders that the killings at Charlie Hebdo ‘had nothing to do with Islam’ and were just the work of ‘isolated terrorists’ for whom the traitorous politicos who had brought millions of Mueslis to the West could hardly be blamed, surveys found 30% of Mueslis to think insults to Islam should be avenged and 65% of Mueslis to want prosecution of anyone who criticized Mahomet; and the televised crowds supporting Charlie did not involve many A/As. A Spectator correspondent observed:

Wasn’t it amazing to see the leaders of Egypt, Bahrain, Kuwait, Aghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Indonesia, Hamas, Hizbollah, Iran linking hands with Western World leaders saying "Je Suis Charlie!" Oh hang on...

{In fairness, it could have been pointed out that ‘the leader of the West,’ President Obarmy, was also missing – but of course he too was a Muesli, however covertly, elected by multiculticrazed Americans who thought he would solve their country’s grievous race problem.}


A splendidly graphic account of the wretched non-homelives of the Hebdo killers was provided in the Guardian (13 i), which detailed the paternal polygamy, family collapse, children’s homes and near-unemployability from which the Algerians had tried to escape France’s “social dustbin” into a more purposeful life of Mueslidom (which they could barely distinguish from Catholicism). The murderers-to-be, dismissed as petty criminals by police despite several imprisonments and diagnoses of psychopathy, had met in jail:

After his arrest while trying to fly to Damascus in 2005, Kouachi was on remand in the notorious Fleury-Mérogis prison south of Paris, a super-size decaying concrete mega-jail, which is Europe’s largest prison.

The men’s section alone holds 3,800 people – bigger than any jail in Britain. Built in the 1960s, it was supposed to be a model for incarceration but became a byword for tension, inmate violence, drugs, suicide and even the hostage-taking of prison officers.

It is now being refurbished. But at the time Kouachi was placed there pending the legal investigation, it was suffering over 150% over-crowding and Victorian conditions. In 2007, just after Kouachi left and was bailed after 18 months on remand, the International Observatory of Prisons, citing an expert report, complained the conditions were so insalubrious they were dangerous to the health and security of inmates and staff.


 As the West’s peecee politicos and media folk revelled in supporting ‘freedom of speech’ in Paris (where 17 had been murdered by Mueslis), it was little observed that French authorities had several times actually tried to prosecute and close down Charlie Hebdo, that Charlie itself had campaigned to make the Front National illegal, that free speech about Mueslis had long been closed down in Western countries by ‘anti-hate speech’ legislation, and that the topics of race, IQ and biological sex differences had been driven out of public debate as professionals who might talk relevantly about them feared for losing their jobs. {Yes, welcome to the new world of ‘freedom’ – not even critiqued by ‘right wingers’ like Ukip’s Mr Garage, who preferred to mouth anti-racistically that murderous Mueslis (and crackpot socialists) were just a ‘tiny minority’ who just needed a bit more ‘integration’! You couldn’t make it up.}
And the West’s ‘united’ show of pseudo-liberalism did not make much impression in the banlieus of Paris. As memorial services took place for some of those who had died in the terror attacks, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, the Education Minister, held a meeting with teaching officials in response to the many schoolchildren in Muslim areas who had refused to stand to observe a minute’s silence. At a secondary school in Seine-Saint-Denis, more than 80 per cent of the pupils refused to comply, saying the Charlie Hebdo staff had “deserved what they got”. In Lille, a boy threatened to shoot “with a Kalashnikov” a teacher who had asked a class to be quiet during the remembrance of the murdered (Independent, 14 i).
 British Muesli columniste Yasmin Alibhai-Brown also tried to tell it like it was (Daily Mail, 14 i) (she had written a book deploring the rise of veiling):

"Recently, some fourteen Muslim female acquaintances invited me to a small gathering to discuss my book. These were reasonable, educated women, but their reaction to what I had written was staggering.

‘Why did you have to write this, who gave you permission?’ one asked me.

‘Even to think these thoughts is wrong, yet you go and publish them,’ said another. ‘If you were in a Muslim country you would be in jail.’

‘If your mother was alive, she would have slapped you for writing this,’ said a third.

When I replied that my mother, a devout Shia Muslim follower of a liberal sect, refused the veil when she was 22, the woman retorted: ‘Then I feel sorry for you. She was the sinner and she made you one, too.

‘If you are a Muslim, you follow Islamic rules without question. Are you even a Muslim?’"


 Hope for Western respect for love, liberty, loyalty and science got a boost as it turned out that Russia, at least, was making a serious effort to confront the barbaric Muesli ‘state’ of ISIS (aka to Arabic speakers as Daesh – meaning ‘suppression’) and had two of its spies killed (with bullets to the back of the head, apparently fired by child jihadists) – an act which Mr Putin was likely to avenge pretty swiftly (D.Mail, 14 i).


 Superficially, the millions who marched and supported Charlie Hebdo made a gratifying spectacle for the West’s peecee leaders who wanted to make out that everyone was with them in the virtuous defence of free speech. But the leaders had themselves cancelled the most serious forms of free speech (notably about race, IQ and sex differences) over the previous generation, so the support for CH was something of a fantasy. Rather more encouraging was a 50% increase in support for Pegida (‘People of Europe against Islamification’) in Germany, the Front Nationale becoming as front runner in French polld and Ukip’s leader getting air time for the view that it was multiculturalism {with its attendant third-world immigration} that was the biggest threat to liberty.

{Not that Pegida etc had a big chance of success: even as the CH events unfolded, Mueslis of Boko Haram killed thousands and took an area of north-east Nigera the size of Belgium; and a London woman who had been called a hero by PM Cameron for rushing to help a soldier being killed by Mueslis found herself carted off to mental hospital after a verbal altercation with a Black shop assistant in which she suggested he might be happier in Africa.}


 As the BBC’s flagship ‘Question Time’ discussed the spate of Muesli atrocities in France, an overwhelmingy ‘moderate’ audience and panel were provided in Lincoln, with only yag historian David Starkey troubling to defend maximum free speech (for Charlie Hebdo) while assembled worthies wittered on about ‘needing to balance freedom and responsibility.’ Overwhelmed by audience hostility and barely able to be heard, Starkey was unable to mention that, whenever Mueslis had a majority, they didn’t give Christians any freedom and indeed kicked them out, reducing the A/A world’s Christians to 1.5%.

    In fairness to the BBC, the balance of argument was later redressed a little by star broadcaster Andrew Neil who allowed yag politico Michael Portillo and others to get stuck into a French-Egyptian Mueslie who was more interested in her ‘right to be offended’ than in her duty to help punish the CH killers. But ‘QT’ had left the ineradicable impression that British cognoscenti wanted a quiet life of pacificity and politeness and to leave handling mad Mueslis to the French.

This impression was much reinforced by the distinctly thin pro-CH turn-out in Trafalgar Square. (Needless to say, holy peecee Scotland produced no demonstration at all.) It was all rather as when – after a few years of ‘Bloody Mary’ [cf 7/7], the English accepted the relatively peaceful and prosperous life offered under Queen Elizabeth’s Church of England.

Admittedly Elizabeth and advisers had to be personally brave as they faced down European Catholicism – a trait unlikely to be found in Britain’s LibLabCon leaders; but, like her subjects, Elizabeth was far from totally anti-Catholic – actually seeking marriage with a French prince to keep the Spanish at bay – until the Parisians started slaughtering Protestants and the Armada arrived.

So what would be the invasion that would wake up England – the country’s Camp of the Saints moment, as it were? One did not need to look beyond West Africa, where ebola had already killed 8K+ and Nigeria was proving incompetent at dealing with its Muesli invasion. The advance guard of assorted A/As was already at Calais.

    A fine summary of the problems posed for Western leaders by the Mueslis they had treacherously invited was given by the excellent Leo McKinstry (Daily Express, 12 i, ‘Leaders in denial’).


Readers' comments from the Wall Street Journal following the terrorist attacks in France

Just an observation.......
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims'

Think of it:

Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem

Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem

**********SO THIS LED TO *****************

They’re not happy in Gaza
They're not happy in Egypt
They're not happy in Libya
They're not happy in Morocco
They're not happy in Iran
They're not happy in Iraq
They're not happy in Yemen
They're not happy in Afghanistan
They're not happy in Pakistan
They're not happy in Syria
They're not happy in Lebanon
They're not happy in Nigeria
They're not happy in Kenya
They're not happy in Sudan

******** So, where are they happy? **********

They're happy in Australia
They're happy in England
They're happy in Belgium
They're happy in France
They're happy in Italy
They're happy in Germany
They're happy in Sweden
They're happy in the USA & Canada
They're happy in Norway & India
They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!

  And who do they blame....

Not Islam...
Not their leadership...
Not themselves...

And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy!


A fine and full academic summary of Muesli horrors as Christians were expelled from the A/A world (under entirely realistic fears of school closures, rape, pillage, injury, torture, amputations, lashings, stonings, shootings, crucifixions and beheadings) was provided by hardworking American scholar and journalist Raymon Ibrahim [of Egyptian origin] (Crucified Again, Regnery). Ibrahim was not much concerned with the psychology of Islam (with its depriving its adolescent boys of sexual experience except with Christian ‘slags’ or with its deep hatreds coming from polygamy); but he was spot on in pointing to the end of 200 years of Muesli infatuation with West around 1970 as the West turned out to be introducing ‘the permissive society,’ thus losing its good name for family discipline (vital to Mueslis who had no social insurance).

Weirdly enough the Mueslis answer was increasingly to link with the left – but they wanted the money and benefits and they enjoyed the status of being ‘the new underdog’ which the left gladly granted them in return for votes and opposition to ‘imperialist wars.’ Ibrahim was also very good at excoriating Western politicos, media and churches for holding their noses at the fiendish invasion they had unleashed and insisting repeatedly that atrocities like Charlie Hebdo had just “nothing to do with Islam.”
Happily, one ‘mainstream’ newspaper, the Sydney Morning Herald, broke with conventional cowardice and denial for the New Year (12 i, ‘These crimes have everything to do with Islam’):

"When French president Francois Hollande addressed the nation on Friday in the wake of terrorist attacks that left 20 dead, he uttered the predictable mantra: “These fanatics have nothing to do with the Muslim religion”.

His comment is understandable given that France has more than five million Muslims, a stagnant economy, 24 per cent youth unemployment and endemic social alienation among young Muslims.

His comment is also nonsense. A de facto world war is under way and it has everything to do with Islam. It is not thousands of lone wolves. It is not un-Islamic conduct. It involves thousands of Muslims acting on what they believe is their religious duty to subjugate non-believers, as outlined in the Koran.

And the problem is growing, not contracting. There was once a tradition among young Australians to travel overland from Singapore to London. That route has become a hell-hole:

Pakistan is dangerous. Afghanistan is a no-go area. Iran is an oppressive theocracy. Iraq is disintegrating. Syria is a disaster area. Lebanon is dangerous. In Turkey, for the first time, Australians travelling to Gallipoli will be going under a security alert.

All these Muslim countries used to be safe for transit. The intimidation being practised in the name of Islam by a small minority is a by-product of something much larger–the state-mandated conservatism that is systemic in the majority of Muslim societies. Most of them are dictatorships, monarchies, theocracies or failed states.

An investigation by Kings College London and the BBC World Service found that in a single month, November 2014, 5042 people were killed by jihadists in 664 separate attacks across 14 countries. That is one death every eight minutes."

Further mockery of MSM’s mantras that murderers aren’t Muslim, that most Mueslis are moderate and that jihadists can be cured by social workers went on full display among Spectator correspondents (17 i), one of whom actually addressed – unlike all other pundits, talking heads and politicos – the question of what to do about the invaders:

Islam as a brand is dead in the west, and beyond.

Buddhists, Sikhs, Jews, Christians and Hindus, all have a general dislike and mistrust towards Islam, and its' violent psychotic followers.

Our dhimmified politicians and our repugnant media still try to shove it down our throats, but it's done. People do not want it.
Europe's future is bleak: what to do with all these millions and millions of potentially violent and dangerous people? Europeans will revolt I believe. Pegida is only the beginning, yet nobody is listening, not our dear leaders, who filled up our houses with vipers, and not our cowardly media, that had been regurgitating the same exact taqiyya since 9/11.

    The only way I can see SAVING EUROPE is by starting to close down mosques. Only leave liberal mosques open, monitor what's going on inside. This way they will all leave and maybe go back to Cesspitistan.


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, January 12, 2015


 With hilarious predictability, it turned out that England’s ‘teachers’ had taken it upon themselves to report to Local Education Authorities thousands of cases annually of ‘bigoted’ children calling others ‘Chinese,’ ‘Jewish,’ ‘Somalian,’ ‘fat,’ ‘beanpole’ or ‘gay’ (Mail on Sunday, 4 i).

The wheeze had been thought up by Labour when it was in power; and, despite the Coalition saying there was no need for it, a Freedom of Information inquiry found that England’s largely leftist schools had continued gung-ho for the project of effectively marking kids’ cards as ‘racist’ when they were as young as five.

{Yes, after twenty years of tyrannizing academics, broadcasters and politicians, PeeCee was perhaps approaching the ridiculous end of its natural life as even children were to be taught not to speak the truth.}


 As lawyers clamped down on all sides in the case of Prince Andrew’s alleged paying paedophilia, there was little for journalists to go on; but at least the father of ‘molested’ Virginia Roberts (pictured below with his daughter in younger days) was prepared to demand the Prince be prosecuted and a nice current photo of late-in-the-day accuser Virginia began to circulate (below, bottom right).

Whether Buckingham Palace, with its fleet of vulpine lawyers, could shake off the ludicrous charges against the Prince – always a ladies’ man – would be crucial: if even Andy (pictured bottom left with persecuted and once-imprisoned ‘prostitution solicitor’ Jeffrey Epstein) could not be vindicated – for sex with a 17-yr-old, for heaven’s sake – most British (indeed, Western) men would have to shiver in their shoes before troublemaker ooops child protector ‘Dame’ Esther Rantzen.


 Desite assurances by Britain’s wretched politicos that they were ‘addressing’ ‘issues’ of immigration, and that fears of continuing influxes were ‘fanciful’ and, of course, ‘racist,’ the number of gypsies rough-sleeping in central London’s lovely Park Lane and Marble Arch tripled to 500 from 2013 to 2014. A visual aid from a Park Lane underpass:

Local residents complained of aggressive begging, noise, fighting, rubbish dumping and public defecation; but none of this troubled Westminster politicos a bit; and the ‘Romanians’ themselves were embarked (doubtless with ‘legal aid’) on claiming council houses because they were EUSSR citizens. {Once, a generous Britain had looked after India, supplying it with its railways, roads and major buildings and in return getting trade and Indian soldiers to dig trenches in WWI. But what did it expect to get from gyps?}


 French intellectuals squared up for peecee battles as top writer-philosopher Michel Houllebecq was found to be publishing a book (titled Submission) that envisioned a Muesli takeover of France by 2022 (Independent, 6 i). MH foresaw a world in which the leader of France’s Muslim party had beaten the far-right ‘Front National’ in the Presidential election, women abandoned Western dress and left work, non-Muslim teachers were forced out of their jobs and polygamy was re-instated. MH (who had long stayed mainly in Ireland) had previously been prosecuted (unsuccessfully) in France for ‘racism’ etc in 2002.

    Another shock for lofty Parisian republicans, who, from their leafy suburbs, liked to assume France was ‘integrating’ Islam, came as 17 people were killed and 11 injured in a grisly shooting by three AK47-wielding masked gunmen at the central-Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, the satirical newspaper [cf Britain’s Private Eye] which was to have featurd MH’s book on its front cover and which had been firebombed in the past after publishing cartoons in 2011 joking about Muslim leaders. Gunmen were heard shouting the traditional triumphalist Muesli salutation ‘Allo Chocbar!’ as they left the scene of their carnage. France’s soppy-socialist President Hollande called for a display of ‘unity’ – though no immediate closure or blowing up of mosques was envisaged.


 After several years of failing to define himself (except as the friend of bankers and vast infrastructure projects), Britain’s star politician, towsel-haired blond London Mayor Boris Johnson, came out {like this blog} saying immigrants should speak English (Guardian, 6 i). The London mayor, who was speaking on his LBC phone-in, expressed sympathy for the announcement by Ukip’s Nigel Farage that staff in public services should show they can speak English. He expressed ‘amazement’ that even staff employed in the public services were functionally illiterate in English. {He must have led a sheltered life.} Johnson said: “We went through a long period in Britain of having kind of multi-culti Balkanisation of our society. We thought it was a very good idea to teach kids in their own language in primary school classes in London. That is a disastrous approach. They should be learning in English.”


 As the Parisian horror unfolded (including some shootings and a few arrests that would give a lifetime of imprisoned luxury to a few Mueslis), politicos claimed to grieve and they arranged vast spectacles of mourning; but there was no hint of action. So what was to be done? The atrocities of New York, Madrid and London had been met by flurries of Western ‘improving’ activity – involving the overthrow of the dictatorships of Iraq, Libya and Egypt, the descent of Syria into chaos, the rise of ultra-fanatical Solunni ‘Isis’ and the generation of millions of homeless pouring into Lebanon, Jordan and the West. In the course of this, nothing had been done about the true heartland of Muesli terror, Saudi Arabia. This was surely enough evidence that the West’s multiculti approach had been an abject failure. It was time to back the whiter, less mad Shitites; and above all to talk to the Russians.

    That the Paris atrocity was traceable to multiculturalism was also clear to Ukip’s Nigel Farage (D.Mail, 8 i):

He told Channel 4 News: 'There is a very strong argument that says that what happened in Paris today is a result - and we've seen it in London too - is a result I'm afraid of now having a fifth column living within these countries.

'We've got people living in these countries, holding our passports, who hate us.

'Luckily their numbers are very, very small but it does make one question the whole really gross attempt at encouraged division within society that we have had in the past few decades in the name of multiculturalism.'

Appearing on LBC radio, he also criticised the 'really rather gross policy of multiculturalism', referring to the cases of gangs in northern towns grooming children for sex.

But even this modest statement of the obvious was instantly denounced by senior representatives of all three of Britain’s main political parties (‘LibLabCon’) as “sickening” etc.


Faced with a couple of Muesli gunmen who had created mayhem at the HQ of Charlie Hebdo, the ‘satirical magazine’ which had poked fun at Islam, Parisian authorities mobilized no fewer than 88,000 armed and armoured cops to deal with the problem – which they failed to do within 48 hours, which saw the Mueslis shooting a policewoman and a roadsweeper and taking hostages in armed stand-offs in a firm near Charles de Gaulle airport and in a Jewish bakery – most hostages eventually died in shoot-outs.

One or two French politicos were prepared to say France was “at war” with its “fifth column” – but even these daring commentators estimated jihadists as enjoying the support of only “1 – 2%” of Mueslis. {At this rate, France could presumably be bankrupted within a month by the modern method of Muesli warfare – France, like the rest of the peecee West, not recognizing that Muesli terror needed to be dealt with by a proportionate [well, preferably grossly disproportionate] response, especially including the blowing up of some of France’s 90 mosques – matching the virtual expulsion of Christianity from Arabia.}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.


Monday, January 05, 2015

GLOSSARY: A/A means Arab/African


 The New Year began with the hilarity of Mediterranean people smugglers sending 970 illegal immigrants (mainly Syrian) in a rust-bucket ship on autopilot for the heel of Italy – the smugglers having abandoned the vessel lest they be arrested (D.Mail, 1 i). ‘Naturally,’ Italian coastguards boarded the unmanned vessel out of humanitaromaniac duty – though having the excuse that there were no instructions from EUSSR Empress Merkel and that Italy would just pass the Syrians on to France, which would try to pass them on to England or other Nordic countries possessed of idealism and requirement of cheap labour (their own White once-working classes having been largely consigned by socialists to enjoying welfare dependency, prostitution, dog breeding and drug-running).

Any idea of towing A/As back to their homelands, let alone of declaring their invasion unacceptable and closing (or blowing up) a mosque in response to each new Muesli outrage was far from the thoughts of Europe’s peecee politicians.

    The success of the smuggling operation was rapidly followed by another unmanned ship bearing another 450 Syrians being headed for the Italian coast  -- where it was rescued by ‘European Border Control Guards’ (including some from Iceland).

At the same time, Germany’s Milkmaid Merkel issued a strong denunciation of ‘racist’crowds (e.g. in Dresden) objecting to A/A immigration; and a former Swedish prime minister said Sweden belonged not to White Swedes but to whoever showed up. A Swedish school banned the displaying of the Swedish flag (Speisa, 24 xii 2014) lest it upset invading Mueslis – and doubtless ‘liberal’-lefties.


 Showing that fantastic wealth-making was still possible in Britain, the Jewish yag ex-Commie crony of Rev Blair’s, ‘Lord’ Mandy Rice-Davies ooops Mandelson, who had twice had to resign from ‘New’ Labour’s government antics over his financial scandals, brought in a cool £1M from the firm he co-owned with his Brazilian boyfriend – adding to the £8M fortune visible in their London home and to the untold assets from his lucrative dealings with Kazakhstan (D.Mail, 1 i).

"Lord Mandelson has amassed almost £1 million in assets held in Willbury Ltd, whose co-director is his boyfriend, Reinaldo."


(News, 31 xii):  No contraception, no dole -- that’s the view of an Australian ex-Labor Minister who believes welfare should be linked to compulsory contraception.

Gary Johns, writing in The Australian, suggests there should be “no taxpayer inducement to have children”.

The former MP who served in the Keating government admits such a measure will “undoubtedly affect strugglers, [and] . . . Aboriginal and Islander people in great proportions”.

“But the idea that someone can have the taxpayer, as of right, fund the choice to have a child is repugnant.”


 As feminists’ cravings for prosecutions of ‘paedophiles’ and ‘rapists’ of the 1970s reached new heights – with even female High Court judges deemed unable to investigate because of their ‘unacceptable’ contacts with the Establishment and its supposed sex maniacs – a Labour MP counselled (D.Mail, 2 i):

John Mann, MP for Bassetlaw, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme:

‘As an example, one of the things that survivors' groups are calling for in the discussions I've had with them is for government to set up a national institute to take forward this work on what you do with all these people coming forward.

‘Probably, it's going to be many tens of thousands of people across the country. The state can't deal with the numbers of people coming forward.

{And why should the feminoids’ programme of taxpayer-funded job creation for lawyers stop at the 1970s? Why not prosecute Shakespeare [Earl of Oxford] or Henry VIII for their naughtinesses?}


 The feminoid and tabloid fashion of criminalizing men for affairs with teenage girls reached a new high point as the UK’s Prince Andrew (pictured with blonde floozy) and Harvard’s Professor Alan Dershowitiz [a top lawyer] were named by an anonymous 30-yr woman in Florida [where the legal ‘age of consent’ was an astonishing 18] as having had sex with her at age 17 – apparently paid by billionaire American investment banker Jeffrey Epstein and ‘madame’ Ghislaine Maxwell [glamorous daughter of suicided tycoon publisher and pension-pincher Robert Maxwell] bottom right), probably as part of a blackmail operation into which Epstein had recruited 40 prostitutes ooops girls to get info on the mighty.

Supposedly some poor girl, who now wanted more money, had been a ‘sex slave’; but no more evidence was produced of this claim than of her name, photo or address. {Secret ‘justice’ had become a habit in the peecee ‘victim’-protecting leftist West. Yes, mediaevalism was well and truly re-installed. The courts of overfed lawyers would decide everything in their own ways, with the public knowing little of what was going on – partly due to British politicos’ censorious restrictions on journalistic ‘phone hacking’ in revenge for the Telegraph’s exposure of their fiddling expenses.}

Buckingham Palace issued strenuous denials that the Prince – apparently the Queen’s favourite son – had ever had sex with an underage girl; but Professor Dershowitz insisted that the case would need to be seriously and evidentially contested.

SPIRIT OF 2015  

Though Britain had wrecked its economy (by overborrowing that its young would take a generation to repay), wrecked its education system (by useless egalitatarianism) and wrecked its relationship with America (by proving an incompetent ally in Basra and Helmand), nothing could dim its spirit as it entered 2015 which would commemorate Magna Carta and Waterloo and see its revered Queen Elizabeth becoming its longest-serving monarch.

In particular, it went ahead with a fine bust of Mrs Thatcher to be erected in the Falkland Islands – thus annoying the h*ll out of the Argies and reminding Brits of their last notable success (1982....) (D.Mail, 28 xii). The bust was to go up at the end of Thatcher Drive, next to the Liberation Monument which honoured 255 UK servicemen and three Falklands civilians who died in the conflict.

{Naturally, questions of race and IQ stayed strictly on hold – with even Ukip vociferously denying ‘racism’.... But Richard Lynn and I stayed unbowed – with the help of pals in Queensland, Tunisia, Zimbabwe, Denmark, Luxembourg, Leicestershire, Nottinghamshire, London, Saxony and Kansas.}


The London-Edinburgh railway line (once the LNER), at which I had worshipped with scores of other boys in East Barnet of the 1950s, seeing the express trains hurtle from tunnels at 130mph, the height of technology, was brought to a virtual standstill by one of Labour’s vastly overpaid goons, given their ‘jobs’ not with respect for IQ or education but simply as sinecures from which they would pronounce all was jolly-well right with the world thanks to the Gummint.

Here is the overfed goon – though he is only one of many that Labour arranged (and the Coalition continued) to pacify a nation that would actually rather have seen a full House of Commons daily debating (with the PM in attendance, as Sir Winston Churchill usually managed).

Shame of rail chaos fat cat: Signalmen using FLAGS to control 125mph trains, passengers forced, after six-hour delays, to stand from London to Edinburgh, and guess where £675k-a-year boss is... at his holiday cottage in Cornwall

Mark Carne can expect a bonus boost on top of his £675,000 Network Rail salary despite missing a series of performance targets and inflicting misery on thousands of Christmas travellers.


Wise words about ebola from our London correspondent (written as a nurse brought the infection from Sierra Leone to Glasgow, requiring scores of her travelling companions to need to be checked out):

“The whole business of sending NHS staff to West Africa was mistaken because of the danger of the infection being brought back to this country and the removal of NHS staff from the NHS at a time when the service is under great pressure.  Allowing such staff back into the country without having been in quarantine in West Africa or, failing that, undergoing quarantine here before being allowed into the general population is reckless to say the least.

Quarantine is the only effective guard against a disease which is deadly and from which there is no preventive drug treatment.  Consequently, any British national returning from the disease area should also be quarantined.  Foreigners who have recently been in the affected areas should simply be refused entry until the disease is under control.”


 A fine and factual survey of the left’s latest attempts to restrict or even banish thoughts they didn’t like from campuses and the media had been provided in the Speccie by Mark Steyn (19 iv 2014). A sample:

"This is the aging of the dawn of Aquarius: new blasphemy laws for progressive pieties. In the New Statesman, Sarah Ditum seemed befuddled that the ‘No Platform’ movement — a vigorous effort to deny public platforms to the British National party and the English Defence League — has mysteriously advanced from silencing ‘violent fascists’ to silencing all kinds of other people, like a Guardian feminist who ventured some insufficiently ‘affirming’ observations about trans-women and is now unfit for polite society. But, once you get a taste for shutting people up, it’s hard to stop. Why bother winning the debate when it’s easier to close it down?"

{However, MS – though courageously involved in a libel action because he had poked fun at a leading ‘green’ ooops climate scientist -- apparently did not feel brave enough to mention the 20-year ‘liberal’-left suppression of all hereditarian talk about race and IQ....}


Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.