BLACK GENES GOOD FOR SOMETHING Some Black Americans have a gene – ooops, social construct! -- that protects them from heart disease. About a quarter of African-Americans carry the protective gene, and if they are lucky enough to have two copies, one from each parent, their risk of heart disease is 10 times lower that of other Blacks. People with just one copy have five times lower the population risk of heart attacks, blocked arteries and other symptoms of heart disease, a research team reported in the Journal of Human Genetics (Reuters, 27 i).
PAKISTANI ‘PAEDOPHILIA’ BLAMED ON FIRST-COUSIN MARRIAGE Labour’s Lord Ahmed of Rotherham, Britain’s first Muslim peer, joined Labour ex-Home Secretary Jack Straw and the BNP in blaming the tendency for Pakistani men to groom, rape and prostitute under-age White girls partly on the ethnic practice of forced cousin marriage which trapped the men in loveless relationships to illiterate women from Pakistan having sexually restrictive attitudes (Sunday Mail, 30 i). In both recent cases of Pakistanis in Derby being jailed for beguiling White minors (see previous: PAKI PIMPS ARE RACIST), the men had made such cousin marriages at the behest of their families.
Studies had shown that 55 per cent of British Pakistanis married their first cousins, usually from abroad; and in some areas (e.g. Bradford) the figure was as high as 75 per cent. Apparently, Pakistani men picked on young girls because older White females were too savvy and demanded greater expenditure, health checks, condom use or signs of commitment.
All first-cousin marriages and the resulting progeny, housing costs, education costs, unemployment costs and any health costs of the underage White trash were borne by UK taxpayers – despite government advice that first-cousin marriage was unwise. In America, the practice was illegal in thirty states.
A peecee Home Office spokesperson said in response that more research was necessary....
B*GGERED BRITAIN1. 400 foreigners were discovered who could not be deported (whether as criminals or illegal immigrants) for fear of infringing their EU-mandated ‘human rights’ to family life. Britain’s traitorous lawyers routinely advised all foreigners facing possible deportation to find themselves a wife and baby asap (Sunday Telegraph, 30 i, Alasdair Palmer).
2. Many prominent MPs supported a move to compel the Church of England to appoint women bishops – contrary to all the two-thousand year traditions of the Orthodox, Catholic and Anglican churches.
3. An all-party parliamentary group set up to investigate Islamophobia had its chairman and vice-chairman resign after it engaged the services of Islamic sympathizers (called ‘iEngage’ and backed by LibDim sodomite [or at least bisexual] Simon Hughes) to provide the group’s secretariat – and issued a Westminster pass to the Islamists’ ‘head of research,’ Shenaz Bunglawala, allowing her to invite guests of her choosing to wander round the House of Commons and its bars ooops tearooms (Sunday Telegraph, 30 i, Andrew Gilligan).
4. Men and women who merely shouted at their partners risked being thrown out of their homes under a sweeping ruling by UK judges (Daily Mail, 27 i). Raising your voice at a husband or wife, or a boyfriend or girlfriend, now counted as ‘domestic violence’ under the landmark ‘Supreme Court’ judgment. The decision also meant that denying money to a partner or criticising them could count as violence and bring down draconian domestic violence penalties from the Yukay’s peecee courts – unabashed despite nine months of CamCo ‘government.’
The ‘Supreme Court’ made its decision in the case of a woman who left her husband’s council flat and then demanded a new council home. She said she left because she had suffered domestic violence – even though her husband had never harmed her physically.
Lady Hale, leading a bench of five’ justices,’ said the definition of violence must change so that a wider range of abusive behaviour would count in law. The decision affected domestic violence and family law which had already given the courts powers to throw someone out of their home if their partner accused them of violent behaviour. But, till 2011, violence always had to mean physical assault. The judges were hearing the case of (Mueslie) Mihret Yemshaw, 35, who said she had been subjected to domestic violence and was entitled to be rehoused under the 1996 Housing Act.
5. ANARCHISTS, prostitutes and assorted socialistified and unionized nutters proposed to wreck the Royal Wedding on April 29th – following up the Regent Street assault on Prince Charles and his mother-figure Camilla.
NOT SO UNITED Cohesion amongst Britain’s students, busily demanding “F*ck the Fees!” seemed happily in doubt as hooded demonstrators in London screamed “F****** the Tory Jew” at the President of the (invariably leftish) National Union of Students, Aaron Porter, who required police protection to extricate himself from protesters (many of them sporting Socialist Worker placards).
GREEN EAST ASIA Mongolia’s Genghis Khan was branded by scholars as the greenest invader in history -- his murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest! The Mongol leader, who established a vast empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, claimed a new study. The killing of 40M people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (thus telling scholars the story).
And, although GK’s genocidal methods (only exceeded later by those of China’s Mao) were difficult for environmentalists to accept, ecologists were coming to believe it may have been the first-ever case of successful man-made global cooling (Daily Mail, 25 i).
{One of the most striking things about Asian history was the sheer violence of it, far beyond anything the West could show – its deathly technologies of the 20th century achieving little compared to Mao.}
AMERICAN COLLAPSE YIELDS QUICK RESULTS As batty-Black-boy Barry Obarmy abandoned the United States’ 32-year ally in the Middle East, Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak, the beneficiary of $1.5B of American aid annually, Pakistan’s Taliban-backing military were quick to seize their opportunity and announce escalation of their nuclear arms race with India and Britain (Daily Telegraph, 3 ii, Dean Nelson; Guardian, 3 ii).
Meantime. Egypt’s largely illiterate citizenry provided an ongoing demonstration of Stone Age warfare, hurling rocks and paving slabs at each other in Cairo’s Tahrir Square with no sign of that organization of aggressive effort that had been achieved half a millennium previously by the English and Scots at the battles of Bannockburn and Flodden.
America’s staunch anti-Islamist, David Horowitz, correctly commented: “In suggesting that the Muslim Brotherhood can be a democratic partner in Egypt, the Obama White House has outdone even the Carter administration's destabilization of the Shah of Iran in 1979 and its welcoming of the theocratic fascist Khoumeni as a "saint."”
PSYCHOLOGY’S ULYSSES WINS THROUGH’ My review of Playing with Fire, the new biography of Hans Eysenck by Melbourne left-postmodernist ‘historian of science’ Roderick Buchanan, was published in the journal Intelligence (where my star student Ian Deary, FRSA, was the Book Review editor). A choice quote? OK:
....By 1950, at the feet of Burt, Hans, 34, had established himself as identifying objectively six main independent dimensions of human psychological variation: general intelligence (g), neuroticism (N), extraversion (E), conservatism (C), tender-mindedness (T) and psychoticism (P). With whatever minor complications over the years – leading Eysenck himself to associate P (in his last great 1995 book) with independent-mindedness and genius – Hans pursued his six orthogonal Platonic dimensions (his hundreds of high-grade students at the Maudsley jokingly giving each other the sign of the Cross) through the vagaries of behaviourism (‘reciprocal inhibition,’ ‘protective inhibition,’ ‘incubation effects’ etc.) to the solid ground of hereditarianism, underlying cognitive differences (notably in mental speed) and the acknowledgment of racial differences. .... the mealy-mouthed Buchanan is unable, despite his many feints, to lay a finger on Hans, who emerges through Buchanan’s verbal barrage as the Greek god that he was.
STARK CHOICES The fork in the road ahead for Muesli-loving lefties was dramatically illustrated by a case in Muslim Bangladesh where a 40-year man was found to have had a lively sexual affair with a cheerfully consenting 14-year girl. In the modern West, the man would be imprisoned for at least five years; and the girl would be given round-the-clock social work and a place at the Open University. In Bangladesh, the girl was whipped to death (dying after 70 of the 100 lashes to which she had been sentenced by local Islamic clerics); and the man still remained to be found (Guardian, 3 ii).
Not to be outdone, CamCo’s PM Cameron ‘declared war on multiculturalism’ (at least according to the Independent, 5 ii). Apparently, Mueslis should shun ‘extremists’ (whom his own party chairwoman claimed not to exist) and be sure to embrace core British values. But what were these values?
‘EQUALITY’ which had been ruining Britain since 1945 (NHS non-discrimination yielding Britain the highest rate of obesity among women in Europe even as Cameron spoke).
‘DEMOCRACY’ which was not on offer (under first-past-the-post) in the great majority of UK constituencies and nowhere with regard to voting Britain out of Europe and the extension of expensive ‘human rights’ to the rest of the world.
‘RULE OF LAW’, of which Britain had far too much already, generating a paradise for lawyers. And
‘FREEDOM OF SPEECH’ which had actually been progressively cancelled by race relations acts (and lately similar acts forbidding all public criticism of non-Christian religions, wymmin, the handicapped, yags etc.) since 1966. Well might Mueslis reply by inviting White Brits to adopt their own values of FAMILY LIFE, LOW TAXATION and PUBLIC SOBRIETY!
Addressing in Munich an audience of great’n’good’n’well-fed Eurobabblers, Daft Dave took trouble to denounce extremists of all kinds – perhaps preparing for a new UK crackdown on the BNP, EDL or kindred remaining freedom fighters.
On the very same day, the EDL (the revamped BNP, sporting Jewish money, a Sikh leader, Afro-Caribbean members and a yag contingent) mounted Britain’s biggest-ever anti-Islamofascisticist protest, with their 3K demonstrators actually outnumbering those of the UAF (aka Anti-Nazi League) (policing cost £800K) (SkyNews, 5 ii).
Fat-salaried bald besuited bespectacled Black beneficiary of multiculturalism, Trevor Phillips (q.v.), appeared cheerily on TV (BBC1, 6 ii, 09:20) to explain he was not worried to have to cut back the staff at his London-based compulsorily taxpayer-funded ‘Equality Commission’ by 40% since (a) he would still have his own job and (b) PeeCee was so entrenched in Britain that mediafolk invariably said the right multiculti thing out of fear, without equality commissioners needing actually to be “in the room.”
However, the pinko Observer yowled like mad, and even believed Daft Dave’s overture to Frau Merkele had ‘split the Coalition’ (6 ii).
NO THEORY, NO ACTION While the ‘anti-authoritarian’ socialists and ‘Muslim Brothers’ of low-IQ Egypt failed to get their act together (the Mueslis hoping the socialists would do their dirty work to international acclaim before they finally took over), the British right was equally divided, with fear and loathing between Thatcherites, UKIP, BNP and new-boy-on-the-block EDL (due to bring 3K anti-Muesli protesters to Luton, rather encouraged by the BBC which hoped for an all-purpose police crackdown on the right).
In all these sorry cases, there was no racial or eugenic analysis – let alone any mention of the key variable of IQ or even its corollary of academic achievement. Indeed, what all these rabbles had in common was ‘anti-racism’ – with even the Muesli Brothers unwilling to admit publicly that they hated Jews.
{Sadly, the [affirmatively?] Harvard-educated Obarmy hated both Churchill and Thatcher, not to mention selective education of the kind from which he had benefited, so was unlikely to steer the crazed rabbles of ‘the modern world’ to a safe haven – which would probably have to be provided eventually by Mr Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church.}
BRITISH ACADEMIA GETTING “SHY” – PROF. At a belated ‘launch’ for his long-awaited book, Academic Freedom (published 10 x 2010 by Hart, Oxford – see previous), donnish author Eric Barendt relieved himself of a small fart ooops conclusion (Times Higher, 3 ii, ‘Managerial era ‘threatens’ academic freedom,’ + subsequent correspondence): apparently, Professor Barendt believed that academic freedom in the UK was threatened by the "managerial culture of universities, the quality assurance and research assessment culture, and the pressures on academics to produce safe scholarly articles that shy away from the big questions and only move the argument forward by an inch".
{No examples of actual intimidation were mentioned in Times Higher; though, since I had been sacked from Edinburgh LUniversity in 1997 for racism, IQism, sexism and anti-paedohysteria, several British academics had gone strangely quiet about such topics: Geoffrey Sampson (U. Sussex), Frank Ellis (U.Leeds), David Coleman (U. Oxford), David Canter (U.Liverpool), Satoshi Kanazawa (London School of Economics) and Armand Leroi (Imperial College London); and even Emeritus Professor Peter Saunders (ex-U.Sussex), though denounced publicly as a ‘racist’ (by the egalitarian authors of The Spirit Level, see previous), was strangely reluctant to mention race and IQ in the same sentence.}
HAITI “A PROBLEM”! The Dominican Republic deported thousands of illegal Haitian immigrants in January, sowing fear among Haitians living in the country and prompting accusations its government was using a cholera outbreak as a pretext for a crackdown (AmRen, 1 ii). In the largest campaign in years to target Haitians living illegally in the DR, soldiers and immigration agents set up checkpoints and conducted neighborhood sweeps, detaining anyone without papers and booting them out of the country.
Hundreds of thousands of Haitians lived at least part-time in the DR, enduring frequent discrimination and the constant fear of being deported. A cholera epidemic in Haiti that had killed at least 4,000 people and sickened 200,000 had made matters worse. Said the DR’s immigration chief (with a daring that no US official would be likely to emulate), “No (other) country in the world has a border with Haiti. No country in the world has a Haitian problem like the Dominican Republic has.” {Americans and Brits would also have remarked that the DR actually found it possible to deport illegal immigrants and to defend its border.}
RACE REALISM re SPICS, WOPS ‘N’ DAGOES Though the peecee BBC cringingly apologized to Mexico for its Top Gear presenters having quipped that Mexicans were feckless and lazy and had a national dish that resembled ‘vomit with cheese on top,’ the Telegraph’s Simon Heffer was made of sterner stuff, volunteering (5 ii): “Mexico is a bandit state rapidly turning into a failed one. It is under the control of drugs cartels. It has a stratospheric murder rate and most of its police are corrupt. If it were a car, it would be a 1970s British Leyland rustbucket that spent most of its time on the hard shoulder before visiting the crusher.” To which a Torygraph correspondent helpfully added material from Woodbridge’s 1831 Rudiments of Geography: Turks are “bigoted, ignorant and vicious” and the Portuguese are “superstitious, haughty and revengeful.”
------------------------------------
Comments?
Email Chris Brand. --
CV for Chris Brand. --
Some history.
-----------------------------------
