GENES FOR POLITICS
Thirty years after Hans Eysenck (London), Lindon Eaves (Birmingham), Nick Martin (Brisbane) and I (E’bro) had shown evidence of substantial heritability of political views, Nature deigned to admit the possibility that “biology may help to shape political behaviour” (Lizzie Buchen, 24 x – essentially providing a reading list for recent relevant studies of twins, hormone levels, autonomic reactions etc) (the main tendency was for conservatives to be more shockable).
PAEDOHYSTERIA CONDEMNED
Top telly non-peecee comedian, Tory supporter and millionaire Jim Davidson, 58 and having a fifth lovely young wife (art historian Michelle, 41, pictured below, with him), blasted the witchhunting of ‘paedophiles’ of 1980 at the BBC, saying he and everyone else had always known there were plenty of ‘pervs’ like Jimmy Savile (q.v.) in showbiz, that the BBC had ‘gone mental,’ and that there was a serious risk of innocent men being accused (Sunday Mail, 28 x).
He said: “This hot bed of ‘leftyness’ has asked itself the question: "Should we have known?" The answer is "yes". We all knew didn't we?” His comments come after PR guru Max Clifford claimed a dozen big-name stars from the 1960s and 70s had called him, 'frightened to death' they would become implicated in the widening Savile scandal.
{It was much to be hoped that many BBC lefties – all sympathetic with paedophilia and indeed incest around 1980 -- would be consumed in the flames which the latter-day ‘feminist’ left and tabloids had ignited (in righteous concern to defend yags, who were madly believed to have not the slightest fancy for under-16 ‘chicken’). And there was a possibility. For all knew, from The Crucible, that the easiest way to handle witchcraft allegations was to accuse one’s accusers.}
REHAB – TRIED AND FAILED
As Coalition leader Daft Dave announced he would get ‘tough but intelligent’’ about crime, bringing in virtual life sentences for second-time violence (but somehow without clogging the gaols....) and rewarding probation officers who rehabilitated criminals (but somehow without a larger budget....), an unusually frank (for a modern ‘conservative’) assessment of rehabilitation was made by the Speccie’s Alasdair Palmer (27 x):
What reason is there for thinking that any procedure followed by a government official or agent can turn a recidivist criminal into an honest citizen? The more we learn about the basis of human behaviour, the more it seems that an individual’s dispositions — to commit acts of violence, to get addicted to drugs, and to use force and fraud in their relations with others — are determined very early in life, and certainly prior to a first conviction. By the time the probation officers get to work, it is usually too late for their efforts to have much effect.
Yes, the only improving scheme not tried by HMG in the previous half-century was the one proposed by me (as a Prison Psychologist) in 1968: handing released prisoners over to churches of their choice which would supervise them in return for their work and of course take charge of the dispensation (if any) of their state benefits. Failing that, it would be time for eugenics – funded out of legalization and swingeing taxation of drugs (the occasionally unhappy sequelae of which would no longer be paid for by the NHS).
DIVERSITY CAMOUFLAGE NOT WORKING
The ‘liberal’-left’s official veneration of ‘diversity’ was exposed as it turned out that – after 13 years of Labour rule – no less than 77% of ‘public servants’ were left-leaning (compared with 12% being conservative) (Daily Mail, 30 x).
(In the luniversities – long dominated by the quest of seeking taxpayer dosh – the corresponding percentages were probably 97 and 2.) Tim Montgomerie, editor of the ConservativeHome website, said: ‘Resistance to Tory ideas from within the civil service, the quangocracy and the heavily politicised charitable sector could easily be fatal for a large number of policy ideas.’
The incipient civil war between state dependents and business sharks (revealing themselves to each household daily by their telephonic cold calling, junk email and incomprehensible bills and share details) had not yet reached the level of Burma (where ‘liberalization’ let loose Buddhists to take revenge on mad Mueslis [from the tribes of neighbouring Bangladesh]) or Mali (where the West’s lack of support for Christianity allowed a Muesli to drive a jeep into an RC church, blowing it up and killing or maiming some 200).
But the left’s politicization of public life (even rigging up mass pre-Election postal voting in America – guided and checked by the head of household, probably the only literate around in Black families) meant that entrenched and well-funded divisiveness was on its way, diversity-loving rhetoric notwithstanding). {Amusingly, the left neglected that its beloved Mueslis would eventually join the moral/political right.}
DEATH OF A GREAT SCHOLAR: ARTHUR JENSEN, 1923-2012
The London School’s towering genius of the twentieth century died on October 22nd. Art Jensen’s death in California was shrouded in mystery for a while, presumably because his second wife and/or sister did not want ‘anti-racists’ of the Southern Poverty Law Centre and similar to create over his grave the foul publicity for him which they had forever (but especially in the 1970s) attempted while he lived. A fine brief account of his life and achievements for differential psychology was provided by Jared Taylor in VDare, x and a fuller account of his origins and views had resulted from a 2002 interview with Frank Miele (see Brand, Heredity, 2003); but some of the main personal threads deserve picking out.
The first 45 years of Art’s life had been entirely mainstream for an American psychologist of his time. His first great wish had been to be a clarinettist (and he long retained a liking for conducting – in private – in the style of Furtwängler); but he found his way into psychology at U.Cal., Berkeley, and happily took to work in personality and, in particular, projective testing (inkblots etc).
(Sadly, he never linked up with the great Anglo-American psychometrican psychologist and eugenicist, Raymond Cattell.)
Despite a year spent in London with Hans Eysenck in the late 1950s, including development of a short form of the Maudsley Personality Inventory (measuring extraversion and neuroticism) and hearing Sir Cyril Burt, Art did not take particularly hereditarian or ‘scientistic’ positions; and in the mid-1960s he was disunitarian about even the g factor, believing it had two Levels which had only a moderate (‘twisted-pear-shaped’) relation to each other (a phenomenon probably reflecting the brevity and thus unreliability of the main selected Level 1 test, Wechsler Digit Span).
So how did the gentle Art become the controversialist hereditarian, ‘scientific racist,’ ‘fascist’ and supposed firebrand of the 1970s? The immediate answer lay of course in much conscientious study; but Art’s interest in Johnson-era educational improving schemes was itself a response to the environmentalist bullying which he and his first wife had experienced in the 1960s as their daughter’s autism had been blamed (as was then the psychiatric fashion) on ‘refrigerator mother syndrome.’
(Mothers of autists tend to be ‘intellectual’ since it takes intelligence to notice such subtle defiency in social skill in a small child.) It was as Art struggled (together with one or two similarly afflicted friends) to understand his daughter’s condition (the mother being far from the stereotypic frosty type) that he became interested in genetics. And, naturally, his concern with slow learners brought him in touch with Audrey Shuey’s magisterial summary of the voluminous evidence on low Black IQ.
As Art’s classic 1969 Harvard Education Review – documenting for the first time the failure of compensatory education -- became known, it was met with a tsunami of leftist fury (death threats etc requiring years of police guarding for Art and family) and by scholarly onslaught from the top behaviorist Leon Kamin (including a posthumous critique of Burt’s celebrated study of widely separated identic twins).
Eysenck joined in with popular expositions of the hereditarian case, including a Penguin book co-authored with Kamin. Art and Hans undertook a speaking tour of Australian universities – and were silenced by student mobs in most of them. Academically, Art moved his effort into producing his mighty 1980 tome, Bias in Mental Testing, outraging his critics by refuting the then-fashionable guess that IQ tests might be somehow invalid for Blacks and other ‘disadvantaged’ groups, and leading to his books being spurned by mainstream publishers for the rest of his life.
At last serious funding (long a problem for hereditarians) became available: the Pioneer Fund (set up in 1937 to further research into intelligence differences, and which had funded Shuey and was funding Tom Bouchard’s magnificent replication of Burt’s twin work) came to Art’s aid.
He particularly used the opportunity to study the correlations between reaction speed and IQ (first envisaged by Eysenck in 1967, though some relevant work went back to 1900). This was not a specially successful choice and Art might have done better to undertake psychogenetic research, of which he had the best grasp of all differential psychologists. But his work under the ‘racist’ Pioneer umbrella (surprising in that he was, like Eysenck, partly Jewish) provided a vital complement to other work on mental speed and IQ.
Soon Phil Rushton (Race, Evolution and Behavior), Richard Lynn (IQ and the Wealth of Nations) and I (The g Factor) would be providing (equally unpublishably) the necessary follow-up to the ‘heresies’ promulgated with such gentlemanship, assiduity and courage by Art.
He died among most of the academic honours and accolades he could have wished – notably from contributors to the journal Intelligence which his own work had done so much to inspire, if insufficiently acknowledged by the (also part-Jewish) leading popular exponent of hereditarian and nativist views, Steven Pinker (The Blank Slate).
Thus came to a halt pro tempore the main work of the London School, though continued publication and norming of IQ tests was continued by such as John Raven (Edinburgh) and research into the relatively acceptable topic of intelligence declines in old age proved eminently manageable by such younger researchers as Linda Gottfredson (U.Delaware) and Ian Deary (U.Edinburgh). RIP.
Further reading:
http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-arthur-jensen-20121102,0,5349939.story
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/science/arthur-r-jensen-who-set-off-debate-on-iq-dies.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
http://www.nature.com/news/biology-and-ideology-the-anatomy-of-politics-1.11645?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20121030
http://www.vdare.com/articles/arthur-r-jensen-s-courageous-career-choice
http://www.nature.com/hdy/journal/v90/n5/pdf/6800226a.pdf
http://feedomofspeechplus.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/chris-brands-cattell-controversy.html
http://bussorah.tripod.com/ulysses.html
http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/tim-haydon/1581-the-four-jewish-races-of-israel-and-the-high-achievements-of-jews
MULTICULTURALIST CLOBBERED
The wretched Denis Matyjaszek (alias Denis MacShane MP {he had adopted his Irish mother’s maiden name when he went into journalism -- his father was surely a Polish Jew}), a former Labour minister, resigned from the Labour Party after being found fiddling some £13K expenses in nineteen false submissions over four years (Guardian, 2 xi).
Kevin Barron, the Labour chairman of the cross-party disciplinary committee, described the findings against MacShane (q.v.) as the "gravest case which has come to the committee for adjudication". The committee recommended that MacShane should be suspended from the Commons for 12 months, with loss of pay and pension rights for the period, after ruling that he had submitted "false invoices" to pay for official trips to other EU countries. MacShane also allowed interns to keep laptops, paid for by Parliament, when their internships came to an end.
A Labour spokesman signalled that MacShame would be expected to resign his seat altogether, triggering a byelection. Matyasshole blamed his family problems for him immersing himself in anti-anti-semitic work. The Sun called for ‘Dirty Den’ to face criminal prosecution (3 xi).
Matyjaszek was also a fan of the EU and had, hilariously, been described by the Guardian’s Polly Toynbee, on the day before the finding of guilt being announced, as “in communion with the European idea.” His fiddling had been drawn to the attention of Parliament by the British National Party. This was not the first time he had been caught cheating – though, in fairness, he was a relatively independent-minded leftist and gave the more backward Muesli practices a hard time.
BLACK RULE DOES NOTHING FOR BLACKS
Eighteen years after Blacks took over South Africa (where they became 79% of the population after treatments for AIDS came in), Black households earned only one sixth of what was earned by White households (BBC, 30 x) – the same ratio as obtained in Texas. The average annual income of a White SA household was about 365,000 rand ($42,000; £26,000), followed by Indians at 251,000 rand, people of mixed race at 251,500 rand and Blacks at 60,600 rand, the Government’s own census showed.
{How could this be? Don’t ask the BBC! Apparently, under anti-White discrimination, Blacks were given vainglorious job titles; but firms and unions did not feel moved to waste corresponding levels of moolah on the beneficiaries of affirmativism.}
MULTICULT IDEALISM NOT WORKING
The West’s support for the Arab Spring (intended to create multicultural peace and demakrazy) continued to yield mayhem as (Russian-armed) Shitites and (Western-armed) Solunnis killed each other at the rate of 200 per day (BBC1, 3 xi, 22:30GMT). Nigeria’s Western-backed exercise in multiculturalism also looked shaky as Mueslis (with the help of bombing) imposed Sharia law on the north, with the two sides killing 100 per day in the process as the multicult-wishing central government declined to impose boundaries and build fences (which had hugely cut Israel’s problems with Muesli-infested Sinai).
HYSTERIA RAMPANT
Having failed to put in perspective the modest gropings of superstar Jimmy Savile (q.v.), the BBC predictably found itself inundated with rumours of historic hanky-panky, yielding two arrests (and bailings) (of superstars Gary Glitter and Freddie Starr) and a rush by BBC producers to deny (contrary to their memoirs and websites) that they had ever had much to do with Savile (Private Eye, 2 xi).
Universities also reached high-doh with students at St Margaret’s University College, Twickenham, rioting against the college’s paedo contacts and Leeds University rescinding an honorary ‘law’ degree from its top benefactor (Savile had given in £800K – money that would, if there were any ‘honor,’ have to be repaid to Savile’s £4M estate) (Times Higher, 2 xi).
The BBC’s flagship Newsnight programme was advised of a ‘senior Conservative’ who had been part of a paedophile ring which rented out boys from a Welsh children’s home – perhaps the same ring claimed by Labour deputy chairman Tom Watson to have had links to Downing Street under a former prime minister {possibly bachelor organist, choirmaster and yachtsman ‘Sailor’ Ted Heath....} (Daily Telegraph, 3 xi, ‘BBC to accuse politician of being a paedophile’). {Yes, paedohysteria looked set fair to devour its own!}
RACE TO THE BOTTOM
In a compelling demonstration of the incompetence of Western democracy, and of why so few bother to vote, America’s presidential election passed off flatulently with the two candidates making only the vaguest promises and both avoiding the issue of race. Slightly rightist ‘Republican’ Romney could not bring himself to mention that Whites were fed up with Black crime, with Blacks taking university and professional places out of mere ‘affirmativism’ and with the ceaseless Hispanic immigration that was ripping up their country.
And even slightly leftist ‘Democrat’ Obama would not mention the usual ‘lib’-left yowls that America’s 1M Black prisoners and forever underperforming Black youngsters were the victims of White racism. Meanwhile China exhibited the change we really can believe in by electing as leader a man whose own father had actually been imprisoned by Mao for several years and by cracking ahead with learning English and building a new coal-fired power station every day.
-----------------------------------
Comments? Email Chris Brand. -- CV for Chris Brand. -- Some history.
-----------------------------------

